Incidence of and risk factors for venous thromboembolism during surgical treatment for esophageal cancer: a single-institution study

Joint 2022 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a potentially fatal but preventable postoperative complication. Thoracic oncology patients undergoing surgical resection, often after multimodality induction therapy, represent among the highest risk groups for postoperative VTE. Currently there are no VTE prophylaxis guidelines specific to these thoracic surgery patients. Evidenced-based recommendations will help clinicians manage and mitigate risk of VTE in the postoperative period and inform best practice.

OBJECTIVE

These joint evidence-based guidelines from The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons aim to inform clinicians and patients in decisions about prophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung or esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included broad membership to minimize potential bias when formulating recommendations. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 24 recommendations focused on pharmacological and mechanical methods for prophylaxis in patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, pneumonectomy, and esophagectomy, as well as extended resections for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The certainty of the supporting evidence for the majority of recommendations was judged as low or very low, largely due to a lack of direct evidence for thoracic surgery. The panel made conditional recommendations for use of parenteral anticoagulation for VTE prevention, in combination with mechanical methods, over no prophylaxis for cancer patients undergoing anatomic lung resection or esophagectomy. Other key recommendations include: conditional recommendations for using parenteral anticoagulants over direct oral anticoagulants, with use of direct oral anticoagulants suggested only in the context of clinical trials; conditional recommendation for using extended prophylaxis for 28 to 35 days over in-hospital prophylaxis only for patients at moderate or high risk of thrombosis; and conditional recommendations for VTE screening in patients undergoing pneumonectomy and esophagectomy. Future research priorities include the role of preoperative thromboprophylaxis and the role of risk stratification to guide use of extended prophylaxis.

Joint 2022 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a potentially fatal but preventable postoperative complication. Thoracic oncology patients undergoing surgical resection, often after multimodality induction therapy, represent among the highest risk groups for postoperative VTE. Currently there are no VTE prophylaxis guidelines specific to these thoracic surgery patients. Evidenced-based recommendations will help clinicians manage and mitigate risk of VTE in the postoperative period and inform best practice.

OBJECTIVE

These joint evidence-based guidelines from The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons aim to inform clinicians and patients in decisions about prophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung or esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included broad membership to minimize potential bias when formulating recommendations. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 24 recommendations focused on pharmacological and mechanical methods for prophylaxis in patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, pneumonectomy, and esophagectomy, as well as extended resections for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The certainty of the supporting evidence for the majority of recommendations was judged as low or very low, largely due to a lack of direct evidence for thoracic surgery. The panel made conditional recommendations for use of parenteral anticoagulation for VTE prevention, in combination with mechanical methods, over no prophylaxis for cancer patients undergoing anatomic lung resection or esophagectomy. Other key recommendations include: conditional recommendations for using parenteral anticoagulants over direct oral anticoagulants, with use of direct oral anticoagulants suggested only in the context of clinical trials; conditional recommendation for using extended prophylaxis for 28 to 35 days over in-hospital prophylaxis only for patients at moderate or high risk of thrombosis; and conditional recommendations for VTE screening in patients undergoing pneumonectomy and esophagectomy. Future research priorities include the role of preoperative thromboprophylaxis and the role of risk stratification to guide use of extended prophylaxis. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;▪:1-31).

Venous Thromboembolism Following Major Abdominal Surgery for Cancer: A Guide for the Surgical Intern

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a term used to compositely describe deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Overall, the incidence of VTE after major abdominal and pelvic surgery has been reported to be between 10% and 40%.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of post-operative VTE in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for cancer, to identify risk factors associated with VTE, and to assess available thromboprophylaxis tools.

METHODS

A Medline and Cochrane literature search from database inception until February 1st, 2021 was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in the current review. In total, 435,492 patients were identified and the overall incidence of VTE was 2.19%( 95% CI: 1.82-2.38). Τhe following risk factors were associated with VTE: smoking, advanced age (>70 years), a history of diabetes mellitus, American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) classification of Physical Health class III or IV, a history of cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, a history of DVT or PE, elevated plasma fibrinogen level, c-reactive protein (CRP) level, cancer stage III or IV, postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), prolonged postoperative hospital stay, previous steroid use, history of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), heart failure and neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

VTE remains an important complication after major abdominal surgery for cancer and seems to increase mortality rates.

Lemierre's syndrome in adulthood, a case report and systematic review

Introduction: Lemierre's syndrome is a septic thromboembolic complication of an oropharyngeal or neck infection, primarily caused by Fusobacterium species. Although it usually affects young healthy patients, some case reports describe this syndrome in older population.Methods: A case report and a systematic review of the literature were conducted to investigate the late onset of Lemierre's syndrome. Forty-one articles were selected for the qualitative analysis, 39 for the quantitative analysis.Results: The average age of the study population was 52 years old. Diabetes mellitus and upper gastro-intestinal malignancy, common comorbidities in the study population, might play a role in the development of late-onset Lemierre's syndrome. Empiric antibiotic treatment should cover Fusobacterium and Streptococcus species both, which may cooperate to induce purulent disease. Reported unfavourable outcome was more than expected.Conclusion: Lemierre's syndrome in adulthood may differ from the usual version. This disease may further pass unrecognized, if presented out of the expected age range. Nevertheless, early diagnosis and prompt treatment are a requisite to prevent morbidity and mortality, which may be higher in this older population.

Venous thromboembolism after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature to evaluate incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis

PURPOSE

Although esophagectomy remains the preferred treatment for esophageal cancer, it is still associated with a number of complications, including post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to summarize the reported incidence of VTE after esophagectomy, its risk factors, and prevention strategies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria and were selected in the present review. Overall, we identified 9768 patients who underwent esophagectomy, with a post-operative VTE rate of 4% (440 patients). The reported risk factors for VTE included advanced age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III or IV, a history of cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, and the implementation of preoperative chemo-radiotherapy. Postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome was also associated with VTE. No universally applied prevention strategies for VTE after esophagectomy were identified in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite advances in perioperative care, VTE after esophagectomy still represents a source of morbidity for about 4% of patients. Low molecular weight heparin is suggested as the routine standard prophylactic regimen after esophageal cancer surgery.

Significance of D-dimer-based screening for detecting pre-operative venous thromboembolism in patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

A limited number of studies have evaluated the risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for esophageal cancer and the efficacy of a D-dimer (DD)-based VTE screening (DBS). In the present study, we aimed to clarify the changes in DD levels and the effectiveness of DBS.

METHODS

We included 234 patients who underwent esophagectomy between August 2017 and July 2019 and evaluated the changes in DD levels before and after NAC. We had introduced the DBS strategy in August 2018, in which we recommended ultrasound (US) of the leg or computed tomography (CT) with the deep vein thrombosis (DVT) protocol. We then evaluated the incidence of VTE detected by DBS compared with that in the clinical practice as a control.

RESULTS

The DD levels were significantly increased after NAC. After the introduction of DBS, the proportion of patients who underwent US and CT after NAC was significantly increased. VTE was more frequently detected in the DBS group than in the control group (16.7% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.02) among patients who underwent NAC. Pulmonary embolism (PE) during NAC was also more frequent in the DBS than in the control group (7.6% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.06). The DD levels after NAC were significantly higher in patients with VTE than in those without.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC for patients with esophageal cancer increases the risk of developing VTE. DBS is useful in identifying asymptomatic DVT and may contribute to improving patient safety.

CO2 artificial pneumothorax on coagulation and fibrinolysis during thoracoscopic esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

CO2 artificial pneumothorax creates a sufficient operative field for thoracoscopic esophagectomy. However, it has potential complications and continuous CO2 insufflation may impede coagulation and fibrinolysis. We sought to compare the effects of CO2 artificial pneumothorax on perioperative coagulation and fibrinolysis during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

METHODS

We investigated patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy with (group P, n = 24) or without CO2 artificial pneumothorax (group N, n = 24). The following parameters of coagulation-fibrinolysis function: intraoperative bleeding volume; serum levels of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), thromboelastogram (TEG), D-Dimer; and arterial blood gas levels were compared with two groups.

RESULTS

Group P showed higher levels of PaCO2, reaction time (R) value and kinetics (K) value, but significantly lower pH value, alpha (α) angle and Maximum Amplitude (MA) value at 60 minutes after the initiation of CO2 artificial pneumothorax than group N ((P < .05, all). The t-PA level after CO2 insufflation for 60 minutes was significantly higher in group P than in group N (P < .05), but preoperative levels were gradually restored on cessation of CO2 insufflation for 30 min (P > .05). There was no significant difference in D-dimer.

CONCLUSION

CO2 artificial pneumothorax during thoracoscopic esophagectomy had a substantial impact on coagulation and fibrinolysis, inducing significant derangements in pH and PaCO2.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at the Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR1800019004).

Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

In patients who undergo curative treatment for oesophageal cancer, risk estimates of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism and bleeding are needed to guide decisions about thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of patients with stage I-III oesophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy. The outcomes VTE, arterial thromboembolism, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and mortality were analysed for four consecutive cancer treatment stages (from diagnosis to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, during neoadjuvant treatment, 30-day postoperative period, and up to 6 months after postoperative period).

RESULTS

Some 511 patients were included. The 2-year survival rate was 67·3 (95 per cent c.i. 63·2 to 71·7) per cent. During the 2-year follow-up, 50 patients (9·8 per cent) developed VTE, 20 (3·9 per cent) arterial thromboembolism, 21 (4·1 per cent) major bleeding and 30 (5·9 per cent) clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The risk of these events was substantial at all treatment stages. Despite 30-day postoperative thromboprophylaxis, 17 patients (3·3 per cent) developed VTE after surgery. Patients with VTE had worse survival (time-varying hazard ratio 1·81, 95 per cent c.i. 1·25 to 2·64). Most bleeding events occurred around the time of medical intervention, and approximately one-half during concomitant use of prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery are at substantial risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events throughout all stages of treatment. Survival is worse in patients with thromboembolic events during follow-up.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism after oncologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk and prognosis of VTE associated with oncologic surgery need to be quantified to guide patient management. We aimed to examine the availability of data and to report the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients after surgery, as well as the clinical outcomes of VTE following oncologic surgery.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases for terms related to VTE after oncologic surgery from inception to November 1, 2017. A random-effects meta-analysis was done to calculate the pooled incidence of VTE.

RESULTS

Of the 8611 citations identified, 136 studies including 1,481,659 patients met the eligibility criteria. The overall incidence of VTE was estimated to be 2.3% (95% CI 2.1-2.5). Bone and soft tissue cancer (10.6%, 95% CI 2.9-18.2) and lung cancer (8.1%, 95% CI 3.7-12.6) were associated with the highest and second highest risk of postoperative VTE, respectively. Age (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.46, 95% CI 0.40-0.53; I² = 93.8%), radiation (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.62; I² = 34.6%), transfusion (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.48-2.59; I² = 57.0%), and operative time (SMD = 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.16; I² = 100%) were possible risk factors for postoperative VTE. Patients with VTE versus those without had increased odds of all-cause fatal events (11.15, 95% CI 4.07-30.56; I² = 92.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of VTE after oncologic surgery remains high, and this risk varied according to the cancer type, study region, surgical location, and thromboprophylactic strategy. VTE is associated with increased mortality at the early stage of cancer surgery.

Prophylaxis of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Using Enoxaparin After Esophagectomy: A Prospective Observational Study of Effectiveness and Safety

BACKGROUND

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after esophagectomy is higher than in other gastroenterological cancer surgery. Although the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylaxis using enoxaparin have been established in orthopedic, abdominal, and pelvic surgeries, no studies regarding esophagectomy are available.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted to elucidate the usefulness of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis after esophagectomy. The study enrolled 30 patients who underwent elective esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between April 2015 and October 2016. During postoperative days 2-11, the patients received a subcutaneous injection of enoxaparin (2000 IU) twice daily. The primary end point for the study was the incidence of postoperative VTE. In addition, the incidence of all enoxaparin treatment- and operation-related adverse events was investigated. The study identified VTE by VTE protocol-enhanced computed tomography, performed routinely during and after enoxaparin treatment.

RESULTS

One pulmonary embolism (PE) (3.3%) and two deep vein thromboses (DVTs) (6.7%) were observed during enoxaparin treatment. In addition, one PE (3.6%) and four DVTs (14.3%) (one patient experienced both) were observed after treatment. All VTEs were asymptomatic. Regarding enoxaparin-related adverse events, four minor bleeds occurred but did not require discontinuation of enoxaparin. The incidence of postoperative morbidity was acceptable. In blood tests related to coagulation, no significant differences were observed between patients with and without VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors believe that thromboprophylaxis using enoxaparin is safe and can prevent VTE after esophagectomy. However, its effectiveness is limited to the period of treatment, so additional prophylaxis may be recommended.

Predictive factors of thromboembolic complications in patients with esophagogatric adenocarcinoma undergoing preoperative chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic events (TEEs) represent a significant treatment and disease complication for cancer patients. In the present study we assessed the incidence of TEEs in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The risk factors for TEE development and their impact on prognosis were further analyzed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from 590 patients with esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, who received preoperative epirubicin-cisplatin with capecitabine (ECX) or 5-fluorouracil (ECF) between 2009 and 2016 in three UK hospitals were retrospectively collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-one percent had stomach primary and 98% received ECX chemotherapy. In total, 52 patients (9%) had a venous and 22 (4%) an arterial event. Of those patients with venous TEEs (vTTEs), 39 had pulmonary embolism and 13 deep vein thrombosis, whereas in patients with arterial TEEs (arTTEs), 7 developed a myocardial infarct, 8 developed limb ischemia, 4 developed cerebrovascular accidents and 3 developed superior mesenteric artery thrombosis. ArTEEs were associated with a much higher inoperability rate compared to cases without TEE or with vTEE (77% vs. 20% vs. 31%, respectively, p < .001). Independent risk factors of vTEEs were primary site being the stomach (Odds ratio [OR] 3.24, 95%CI 1.72-6.12, p < .001), being overweight (OR 3.11, 95%CI 1.33-7.26, p = .009) or obese (OR 4.52, 95%CI 1.85-11.09, p = .001) and the presence of central venous access device (OR 3.40, 95%CI 1.00-11.55, p = .050). In contrast, anticoagulant treatment was independently associated with a lower risk of vTEE (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.06-0.83, p = .026). Khorana score of 4-5 was an independent risk factor of arTEE (OR 6.38, 95%CI 1.85-22.04, p = .003). Finally, arTEEs were an independent poor prognostic factor for OS, when adjusted for baseline patient, tumor and treatment characteristics (Hazard ratio 3.02, 95%CI 1.85-4.95, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative ECX/ECF chemotherapy for patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma was associated with relatively high incidence of TEEs. However, only arTEEs affected patient survival outcomes.

Venous thromboembolism in patients with esophageal or gastric cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

There is a well-established link between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE), and patients receiving chemotherapy for esophageal or gastric cancer appear at high risk of developing VTE. The incidence of VTE in the neoadjuvant setting in these patients is poorly understood, as is the role for thromboprophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A PubMed search was conducted using a combination of terms including; esophageal & gastric cancer, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), VTE, neoadjuvant, chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. One hundred and fifty-four articles were retrieved and a narrative review was conducted. For patients with esophageal and gastric cancer the incidence of VTE ranged from 4 to 19%. Gastric cancer (Odds Ratio [OR] 6.38, [95% CI: 1.96-20.80]) and Stage III/IV disease, (OR 5.16 [95% CI: 1.29-20.73]) were identified as risk factors for developing VTE. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was identified as an independent risk factor for developing VTE. Symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE have a similar effect on mortality. Median overall survival for asymptomatic VTE was 13.9 months (95% CI: 5.0-∞) versus 12.8 months (95% CI: 4.7-30.3) if the VTE was symptomatic. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a significant risk factor for VTE in patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. Intervention to minimize the risk using pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis should be considered, and this should start in the neoadjuvant period.

Bidirectional risk between venous thromboembolism and cancer in East Asian patients: synthesis of evidence from recent population-based epidemiological studies

BACKGROUND

Unprovoked (idiopathic) venous thromboembolism (VTE) with no obvious antecedent risk factors, is associated with a significant risk of subsequent occult cancer. Conversely, there is a heightened risk of VTE in cancer patients. This bidirectional risk can be estimated from population-based cohort studies conducted in East Asians.

METHODS

A literature search using medical subject heading terms and Boolean logic in PubMed and MedLine was performed in April 2017. Twenty-two papers reported from East Asia were retrieved for study and data synthesis. Proportional meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to synthesize data with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) when appropriate.

RESULTS

Synthesis of data on VTE incidence in the East Asian population (I² = 76.2%) showed that pooled incidence was 20.3 (95% CI, 11.2-32) per 100,000 person-years. VTE incidence steadily increased with age. Unprovoked VTE accounted for 35% (95% CI, 24%-48%) of all cases of incident VTE (I² = 99.7%). The overall cancer risk was significantly higher (2.3-fold) in the VTE cohort than in comparators. Among the patients with unprovoked VTE, approximately 7% had a subsequent cancer diagnosis within 2 years of the first episode of idiopathic VTE. The risk of VTE recurrence was increased in cancer patients (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.26-1.99). VTE incidence was 9.9 per 1,000 person-years in cancer patients, particularly in liver, pancreas, and lung cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Newly diagnosed VTE incidence is estimated at approximately 4,400 new cases annually in Taiwan and 7,100 in South Korea. Similar to the trend in VTE incidence among the general population, VTE risk in East Asian cancer patients is markedly lessened.

Plasma Fibrinogen in Patients With Bell Palsy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the plasma fibrinogen level in patients with Bell palsy and explore the significances of it in Bell palsy.

METHODS

One hundred five consecutive patients with facial paralysis were divided into 3 groups: group I (Bell palsy), group II (temporal bone fractures), and group III (facial nerve schwannoma). In addition, 22 volunteers were defined as control group. Two milliliters fasting venous blood from elbow was collected, and was evaluated by CA-7000 Full-Automatic Coagulation Analyzer.

RESULTS

The plasma fibrinogen concentration was significantly higher in the group of patients with Bell palsy (HB IV-VI) than that in the control group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between group II and control group (P >0.05); similarly, there was also no marked difference between group III and control group (P >0.05). In group I, the plasma fibrinogen levels became higher with the HB grading increase. The plasma fibrinogen level of HB-VI was highest.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma fibrinogen has an important clinical meaning in Bell palsy, which should be used as routine examination items. Defibrinogen in treatment for patients with high plasma fibrinogen content also should be suggested.

[Risk of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: Reality, actuality and perspectives]

Cancer is a leading cause of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and vice versa. Pulmonary embolism is the second cause of death in cancer patients. Tumor progression is associated with coagulation activation. The pathogenesis of thrombosis during cancer is particularly complex stemming from multiple connections of this disease with both systems of inflammation and hemostasis. The risk of VTE depends on cancer type and the stage of the disease, the anticancer treatments and the time since cancer diagnosis as well as on the presence of patient-related risk factors (i.e. age, obesity, previous history of VTE, underlying diseases…). The presence of other precipitating factors and the duration of the exposure to them are also key elements in the assessment of such a thrombotic risk. It is therefore important to identify all the VTE risk factors to identify patients at high vascular risk and to determine the period during which this risk is significantly increased. The integration of biomarkers of hypercoagulability in proposed risk assessment models for VTE will improve their capacity to identify patients eligible for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. In this review, we report the current status of knowledge on the connection between cancer and hypercoagulability, the numerous risk factors for VTE must be identified in cancer patients and the best methodology to build a more accurate assessment of this vascular risk in such a complex medical context.

Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Plasma Fibrinogen Levels in Patients with Operable Breast Cancer

Purpose

Elevated plasma fibrinogen levels are associated with tumor progression and poor outcomes in different cancer patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical and prognostic value of preoperative plasma fibrinogen levels in patients with operable breast cancer.

Methods

Two hundred and twenty-three patients diagnosed with breast cancer were retrospectively evaluated in this study. Plasma fibrinogen levels were examined before treatment and analyzed along with patient clinicopathological parameters, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival(OS). Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the clinicopathological parameters associated with DFS and OS.

Results

Elevated preoperative plasma fibrinogen levels were directly associated with age of diagnose (≤47 vs. >47, p<0.001), menopause (yes vs. no, p<0.001), tumor size (T1&T2 vs.T3&T4, p = 0.033), tumor stage (Ⅰvs.Ⅱvs.Ⅲ, p = 0.034) and lymph node involvement (N = 0 vs. 1≤N≤3 vs. N≥4, p<0.001), but not with histological grade, molecular type and other Immunohistochemical parameters(ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67). In a univariate survival analysis, tumor stage, tumor size, lymph node involvement (p<0.001/ p<0.001)and plasma fibrinogen (p<0.001/ p<0.001) levels were associated with disease-free and overall survival, but just lymph nodes involvement (p<0.001, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6–5.3/ p = 0.006, HR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.4–7.3) and plasma fibrinogen levels (p = 0.006, HR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.4–8.3/ p = 0.002, HR = 10.1, 95% CI = 2.3–44.6) were associated with disease-free and overall survival in a multivariate survival analysis, respectively.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that elevated preoperative plasma fibrinogen levels are associated with breast cancer progression and are independently associated with a poor prognosis in patients with operable breast cancer.