1
|
Caro-Cañizares I, López Carpintero N, Carmona-Camacho R. The Elephant in the Room: A Systematic Review of the Application and Effects of Psychological Treatments for Pregnant Women with Dual Pathology (Mental Health and Substance-Related Disorders). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:392. [PMID: 38673305 PMCID: PMC11050033 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21040392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Maternal mental health and substance use, referred to as dual pathology, represent significant concerns associated with adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, a prevalence higher than commonly anticipated. Nonetheless, a notable dearth exists ofevidence-based treatment protocols tailored for pregnant women with dual pathology. METHODS A systematic review, adhering to the PRISMA methodology, was conducted. RESULTS Out of the 57 identified papers deemed potentially relevant, only 2were ultimately included. Given the limited number of studies assessing the efficacy of psychological interventions utilizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for both mental health and substance misuse, and considering the diverse objectives and measures employed, definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of psychological interventions in this domain prove challenging. CONCLUSIONS Maternal mental health appears to be the proverbial "elephant in the room". The development of specialized and integrated interventions stands as an imperative to effectively address this pressing issue. As elucidated in the present review, these interventions ought to be grounded in empirical evidence. Furthermore, it is essential that such interventions undergo rigorous evaluation through RCTs to ascertain their efficacy levels. Ultimately, the provision of these interventions by psychology/psychiatric professionals, both within clinical practice and the RCTs themselves, is recommended to facilitate the generalizability of the results to specialized settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Caro-Cañizares
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud y la Educación, Universidad a Distancia de Madrid, UDIMA, 28400 Collado Villalba, Spain
| | - Nayara López Carpintero
- Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario del Tajo, 28300 Aranjuez, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oliver C, Puiras E, Sharma V, Mazmanian D. Careful considerations for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder during and following pregnancy. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:159-170. [PMID: 38196397 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2303430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The focus on perinatal mental health has expanded recently, though there is less research on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Therefore, a review of the literature was undertaken and coupled with expert clinical insights to discuss current clinical practice recommendations for PTSD in the perinatal period. AREAS COVERED This review covers considerations for the assessment, prevention, and treatment of PTSD during the perinatal period. Within these sections, evidence-based and promising practices are outlined. Extra attention is afforded to treatment, which includes considerations from both psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological perspectives. This review closes with coverage of three important and related areas of consideration, including bereavement, intimate partner violence, and childhood sexual abuse. EXPERT OPINION Psychotherapeutic interventions for PTSD during pregnancy are limited, and no strong recommendations can be supported at this time while evidence points toward the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapies and eye movement desensitization therapy as first-line treatments postpartum though research evidence is also limited. Research on psychopharmacological interventions is similarly scarce, though selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be beneficial. Clinicians should also be mindful of additional considerations that may be needed for the treatment of PTSD in the context of bereavement, intimate partner violence, and history of sexual violence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey Oliver
- Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erika Puiras
- Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Verinder Sharma
- Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Parkwood Institute Mental Health, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dwight Mazmanian
- Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jones KA, Freijah I, Brennan SE, McKenzie JE, Bright TM, Fiolet R, Kamitsis I, Reid C, Davis E, Andrews S, Muzik M, Segal L, Herrman H, Chamberlain C. Interventions from pregnancy to two years after birth for parents experiencing complex post-traumatic stress disorder and/or with childhood experience of maltreatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 5:CD014874. [PMID: 37146219 PMCID: PMC10162699 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014874.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acceptable, effective and feasible support strategies (interventions) for parents experiencing complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) symptoms or with a history of childhood maltreatment may offer an opportunity to support parental recovery, reduce the risk of intergenerational transmission of trauma and improve life-course trajectories for children and future generations. However, evidence relating to the effect of interventions has not been synthesised to provide a comprehensive review of available support strategies. This evidence synthesis is critical to inform further research, practice and policy approaches in this emerging area. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions provided to support parents who were experiencing CPTSD symptoms or who had experienced childhood maltreatment (or both), on parenting capacity and parental psychological or socio-emotional wellbeing. SEARCH METHODS In October 2021 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, six other databases and two trials registers, together with checking references and contacting experts to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA All variants of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any intervention delivered in the perinatal period designed to support parents experiencing CPTSD symptoms or with a history of childhood maltreatment (or both), to any active or inactive control. Primary outcomes were parental psychological or socio-emotional wellbeing and parenting capacity between pregnancy and up to two years postpartum. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of trials for inclusion, extracted data using a pre-designed data extraction form, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence. We contacted study authors for additional information as required. We analysed continuous data using mean difference (MD) for outcomes using a single measure, and standardised mean difference (SMD) for outcomes using multiple measures, and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data. All data are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We undertook meta-analyses using random-effects models. MAIN RESULTS We included evidence from 1925 participants in 15 RCTs that investigated the effect of 17 interventions. All included studies were published after 2005. Interventions included seven parenting interventions, eight psychological interventions and two service system approaches. The studies were funded by major research councils, government departments and philanthropic/charitable organisations. All evidence was of low or very low certainty. Parenting interventions Evidence was very uncertain from a study (33 participants) assessing the effects of a parenting intervention compared to attention control on trauma-related symptoms, and psychological wellbeing symptoms (postpartum depression), in mothers who had experienced childhood maltreatment and were experiencing current parenting risk factors. Evidence suggested that parenting interventions may improve parent-child relationships slightly compared to usual service provision (SMD 0.45, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.96; I2 = 60%; 2 studies, 153 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference between parenting interventions and usual perinatal service in parenting skills including nurturance, supportive presence and reciprocity (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.58; I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 149 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies assessed the effects of parenting interventions on parents' substance use, relationship quality or self-harm. Psychological interventions Psychological interventions may result in little or no difference in trauma-related symptoms compared to usual care (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.31; I2 = 39%; 4 studies, 247 participants; low-certainty evidence). Psychological interventions may make little or no difference compared to usual care to depression symptom severity (8 studies, 507 participants, low-certainty evidence, SMD -0.34, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.03; I2 = 63%). An interpersonally focused cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy may slightly increase the number of pregnant women who quit smoking compared to usual smoking cessation therapy and prenatal care (189 participants, low-certainty evidence). A psychological intervention may slightly improve parents' relationship quality compared to usual care (1 study, 67 participants, low-certainty evidence). Benefits for parent-child relationships were very uncertain (26 participants, very low-certainty evidence), while there may be a slight improvement in parenting skills compared to usual care (66 participants, low-certainty evidence). No studies assessed the effects of psychological interventions on parents' self-harm. Service system approaches One service system approach assessed the effect of a financial empowerment education programme, with and without trauma-informed peer support, compared to usual care for parents with low incomes. The interventions increased depression slightly (52 participants, low-certainty evidence). No studies assessed the effects of service system interventions on parents' trauma-related symptoms, substance use, relationship quality, self-harm, parent-child relationships or parenting skills. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is currently a lack of high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions to improve parenting capacity or parental psychological or socio-emotional wellbeing in parents experiencing CPTSD symptoms or who have experienced childhood maltreatment (or both). This lack of methodological rigour and high risk of bias made it difficult to interpret the findings of this review. Overall, results suggest that parenting interventions may slightly improve parent-child relationships but have a small, unimportant effect on parenting skills. Psychological interventions may help some women stop smoking in pregnancy, and may have small benefits on parents' relationships and parenting skills. A financial empowerment programme may slightly worsen depression symptoms. While potential beneficial effects were small, the importance of a positive effect in a small number of parents must be considered when making treatment and care decisions. There is a need for further high-quality research into effective strategies for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley A Jones
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - Isabella Freijah
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - Sue E Brennan
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joanne E McKenzie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tess M Bright
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - Renee Fiolet
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - Ilias Kamitsis
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - Carol Reid
- Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Elise Davis
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - Shawana Andrews
- Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - Maria Muzik
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Leonie Segal
- Health Economics and Social Policy, Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Australia
| | - Helen Herrman
- Orygen, National Centre of Excellenece in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catherine Chamberlain
- Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
- Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
- NGANGK YIRA Murdoch University Research Centre for Aboriginal Health and Social Equity, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention Under Internet-Based WeChat Platform Education on Postoperative Recovery of Puerperae Undergoing Cesarean Section. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING 2022; 2022:5040461. [PMID: 35432841 PMCID: PMC9007654 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5040461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objective. To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention under internet-based WeChat platform education on postoperative recovery of puerperae undergoing cesarean section (C-section). Methods. A total of 96 patients undergoing C-section in our hospital from June 2018 to October 2021 were selected for the retrospective analysis and grouped according to the nursing intervention modes as follows: patients who received a routine nursing intervention were included in the control group, and patients who received comprehensive nursing intervention under internet-based WeChat platform education were included in the study group, with 48 cases each. After the intervention, the postoperative recovery of puerperae undergoing C-section and obstetrics nursing quality were scientifically assessed. Results. No statistical differences in general data between the two groups were observed (
). Compared with the control group, patients in the study group had obviously earlier initial time of lactation (
), significantly higher breast milk amount within 48 h after delivery (
), significantly earlier spontaneous urination time, anal exhaust time and off-bed activity time (
), obviously better mastery of health knowledge (
), and, in terms of SCL-90, remarkably lower total score, average total positive score, and the number of positive items and scores in dimensions, such as somatization, obsessive-compulsive, depression, anxiety, interpersonal sensibility, anger-hostility, phobic-anxiety, and paranoid ideation (
). At discharge, 3 months, and 6 months of follow-up, patients in the study group obtained significantly higher scores on quality of life than the control group (
). Conclusion. In the nursing of puerperae undergoing C-section, comprehensive nursing intervention measures based on the internet-based WeChat platform education can effectively improve the early lactation, mastery of health knowledge, and adverse emotions of puerpera and promote their postoperative recovery.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sanjuan PM, Fokas K, Tonigan JS, Henry MC, Christian K, Rodriguez A, Larsen J, Yonke N, Leeman L. Prenatal maternal posttraumatic stress disorder as a risk factor for adverse birth weight and gestational age outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2021; 295:530-540. [PMID: 34509068 PMCID: PMC10481878 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although not routinely assessed, prenatal posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with poor maternal mental health and mother-infant bonding. Prenatal PTSD may also be associated with birth weight and gestational age outcomes, but this remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the association of prenatal PTSD with risk of low birth weight (LBW) or preterm birth (PTB) (dichotomous medically-defined cut-offs) or with birth weight (BW) or gestational age (GA) (continuous variables). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Web of Science, MedLine, PubMed, and PsychInfo. Data were collected and processed according to Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottowa Quality Assessment Scale. Pooled effect sizes were estimated with random-effects models (correlation for continuous and odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes). RESULTS Sixteen studies with 51,470 participants (prenatal PTSD 8%) were included in 4 meta-analyses. Maternal prenatal PTSD was associated with higher risks of LBW (OR = 1.96; 95% CI, 1.26, 3.03; P = .003), PTB (OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.16, 1.73; P = .001), and reduced GA (r = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.06, -0.01; P = .002). LIMITATIONS Different designs across studies, variety of PTSD assessment practices, and a small pool of studies were noted. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest prenatal PTSD presents increased risks of LBW, PTB, and reduced GA. Evidence of physical harm to neonates from prenatal PTSD provides a powerful rationale to increase prenatal PTSD screening and identify effective prenatal interventions to improve maternal and child outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar M Sanjuan
- Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, United States; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, United States.
| | - Kathryn Fokas
- Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, United States
| | - J Scott Tonigan
- Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, United States
| | - Melissa C Henry
- Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, United States
| | - Korinna Christian
- Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, United States; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, United States
| | - Andrea Rodriguez
- Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, United States
| | - Jessica Larsen
- University of New Mexico School of Medicine, United States
| | - Nicole Yonke
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, United States
| | - Lawrence Leeman
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Granner JR, Seng JS. Using Theories of Posttraumatic Stress to Inform Perinatal Care Clinician Responses to Trauma Reactions. J Midwifery Womens Health 2021; 66:567-578. [PMID: 34612574 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Understanding of the importance of addressing trauma in health care is increasing rapidly. Health care providers may be actively seeking ways to address trauma sequelae affecting their patients with a trauma-informed continuum of care. Such a continuum includes a universal approach, targeted interventions (ie, practices and programs), and specialist treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as well as responses to historic and intergenerational trauma. Client presentations and their needs are highly individualized. Therefore, an understanding of prominent theories of what causes PTSD may assist perinatal care professionals in adapting their practice to be trauma-informed and trauma-specific. The purpose of this article is to review 4 theories of PTSD relevant to perinatal practice and present an evidence-based practice framework that encourages collaborative choices consistent with client values and preferences. A brief summary of current evidence-based PTSD treatment guidelines is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julia S Seng
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stevens NR, Miller ML, Puetz AK, Padin AC, Adams N, Meyer DJ. Psychological Intervention and Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Call to Action. J Trauma Stress 2021; 34:575-585. [PMID: 33340151 DOI: 10.1002/jts.22641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during pregnancy is a significant global mental health concern that affects up to 1 in 5 trauma-exposed pregnant women and is associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and infant complications and health outcomes. This systematic literature review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, examined findings from studies of psychological interventions and treatments for prenatal PTSD to inform recommendations for future research. Relevant evidence was identified from reference reviews and electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Google Scholar, PsychInfo, and Scopus). Included studies reported on the effect of nonpharmacological intervention or treatment of PTSD symptomatology delivered during pregnancy, with at least one postintervention follow-up collected during pregnancy to assess prenatal treatment outcomes. The systematic review was augmented with a discussion of lower-level evidence. Of the 954 articles screened, six peer-reviewed, quantitative reports met the inclusion criteria and featured three empirically based interventions, including two randomized controlled trials: Two psychoeducation interventions for PTSD and one treatment study of interpersonal psychotherapy in trauma-exposed pregnant women. Effect sizes for PTSD symptom change ranged from small to large, Cohen's d/ηp 2 = 0.16-0.78. No studies examined evidence-based PTSD treatments (e.g., exposure therapy, cognitive processing therapy). A risk of bias assessment indicated variability in study quality. This review demonstrates that research on prenatal PTSD symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment is extremely limited despite a clear link between prenatal PTSD and perinatal complications. Early evidence supports further scientific inquiry into psychoeducation, psychotherapy treatments (e.g., exposure therapy), integrated prenatal care approaches, and community-based approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie R Stevens
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michelle L Miller
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ann-Kathrin Puetz
- Department of Clinical and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Avelina C Padin
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Natasia Adams
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stevens NR, Miller ML, Soibatian C, Otwell C, Rufa AK, Meyer DJ, Shalowitz MU. Exposure therapy for PTSD during pregnancy: a feasibility, acceptability, and case series study of Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET). BMC Psychol 2020; 8:130. [PMID: 33298159 PMCID: PMC7727253 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-020-00503-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prenatal posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a significant complication of pregnancy linked to increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Although 1 in 5 pregnant trauma-exposed individuals have PTSD, most PTSD treatment trials exclude participants who are pregnant, and none focus on treatment specifically during pregnancy. Moreover, access to mental health treatment is particularly challenging in low-resource settings with high rates of trauma. This study examined implementation of Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET), a short-term evidence-based PTSD treatment, in an urban prenatal care setting. Partial telehealth delivery was used to increase accessibility. Study aims were to examine (a) feasibility, (b) acceptability, and (c) case-based treatment outcomes associated with NET participation. Method Eight pregnant participants (median age = 27, median gestational week in pregnancy = 22.5) received up to six sessions of NET with partial telehealth delivery. PTSD and depression symptoms were assessed at pre-treatment intake (T1), at each session (T2), and 1-week post-treatment (T3). A multiple case study approach was used to examine recruitment and engagement, retention, treatment completion, treatment barriers, use of telehealth, participants’ experiences of treatment, and PTSD and depression symptoms. Results Nine of the 16 participants (56%) who were invited to participate engaged in treatment, and one dropped out after the first session. Eight participants completed the minimum “dose” of 4 NET sessions (N = 8/9, 89%). Seven participants gave the highest ratings of treatment acceptability. The most frequently reported barriers to treatment were competing priorities of work and caring for other children. Pre-post treatment symptom measures revealed clinically meaningful change in PTSD severity for nearly all participants (7/8, 88%). Conclusions Results suggest that a brief exposure therapy PTSD treatment can be successfully implemented during pregnancy, suggesting promising results for conducting a larger-scale investigation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04525469. Registered 20 August 2020–Retrospectively registered, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/template/EditRecord.vm?epmode=View&listmode=Edit&uid=U00058T2&ts=3&sid=S000A59A&cx=-w1vnvn
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie R Stevens
- Rush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Michelle L Miller
- Rush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Christina Soibatian
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
| | - Caitlin Otwell
- Rush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Anne K Rufa
- Rush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Danie J Meyer
- Vivo International, P.O. Box, 5108D-78430, Konstanz, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baas MAM, van Pampus MG, Braam L, Stramrood CAI, de Jongh A. The effects of PTSD treatment during pregnancy: systematic review and case study. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2020; 11:1762310. [PMID: 33029304 PMCID: PMC7473051 DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1762310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PTSD in pregnant women is associated with adverse outcomes for mothers and their children. It is unknown whether pregnant women with PTSD, or symptoms of PTSD, can receive targeted treatment that is safe and effective. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the present paper was to assess the effectiveness and safety of treatment for (symptoms of) PTSD in pregnant women. METHOD A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines in Pubmed, Embase, PsychINFO, and Cochrane. In addition, a case is presented of a pregnant woman with PTSD who received eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy aimed at processing the memories of a previous distressing childbirth. RESULTS In total, 13 studies were included, involving eight types of interventions (i.e. trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy, exposure therapy, EMDR therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, explorative therapy, self-hypnosis and relaxation, Survivor Moms Companion, and Seeking Safety Intervention). In three studies, the traumatic event pertained to a previous childbirth. Five studies reported obstetrical outcomes. After requesting additional information, authors of five studies indicated an absence of serious adverse events. PTSD symptoms improved in 10 studies. However, most studies carried a high risk of bias. In our case study, a pregnant woman with a PTSD diagnosis based on DSM-5 no longer fulfilled the criteria of PTSD after three sessions of EMDR therapy. She had an uncomplicated pregnancy and delivery. CONCLUSION Despite the fact that case studies as the one presented here report no adverse events, and treatment is likely safe, due to the poor methodological quality of most studies it is impossible to allow inferences on the effects of any particular treatment of PTSD (symptoms) during pregnancy. Yet, given the elevated maternal stress and cortisol levels in pregnant women with PTSD, and the fact that so far no adverse effects on the unborn child have been reported associated with the application of trauma-focused therapy, treatment of PTSD during pregnancy is most likely safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A. M. Baas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Laura Braam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ad de Jongh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, OLVG, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Psychotrauma Expertise Centre (PSYTREC), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- School of Health Sciences, Salford University, Manchester, UK
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
- School of Psychology, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|