Design of a pragmatic approach to evaluate the effectiveness of concurrent treatment for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures: rationale, aims and organization of a Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT) initiated by the Research Group of Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP)

Comparison of Denosumab with Romosozumab in the treatment of male osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study

We aimed to investigate the efficacy of romosozumab treatment compared with that of denosumab in especially male osteoporosis patients. This retrospective cohort study included 174 Japanese male patients receiving either denosumab or romosozumab for 12 months. Propensity score matching extracted 50 patients per treatment group for standardization of group characteristics. The endpoints include the rate of change in the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck after 12 months of treatment as well as the changes in serum bone metabolism markers. The mean 12-month percentage increase in the lumbar spine BMD from baseline was significantly greater with romosozumab (13.0% ±1.7%) than with denosumab (4.5%±0.6%) (P < 0.01). The total hip and femoral neck BMD exhibited a similar trend at 12 months; however, no significant between-group differences were observed. With denosumab, bone formation, and resorption marker levels significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months. Conversely, with romosozumab, the levels of bone formation markers increased transiently at 6 months before returning to baseline, whereas bone resorption markers significantly decreased at both time points. Romosozumab demonstrated significantly superior effects over denosumab in improving BMD, especially of the lumbar spine, suggesting that romosozumab can be used for treating male osteoporosis.

Radiofrequency Echographic Multispectrometry (REMS) can Overcome the Effects of Structural Internal Artifacts and Evaluate Bone Fragility Accurately

PURPOSE

This study measured bone mineral density (BMD) in a Japanese population using the novel non-ionizing system using radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) and compared the results with those obtained using traditional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We aimed to identify any discrepancies between measurements obtained using these instruments and identify the influencing factors.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study examined patients with osteoporosis treated at a single center from April to August 2023. We examined BMD assessment by DXA and REMS in lumbar spine and proximal femur. Patients were categorized into two groups: those with discrepancies between lumbar spine BMD measured by DXA and REMS, and those without. Semiquantitative evaluation of vertebral fractures and abdominal aortic calcification scoring were also performed and compared between the two groups, along with various patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients (88.6% female; mean age 78.39 ± 9.50 years) undergoing osteoporosis treatment were included in the study. A significant difference was noted between DXA and REMS measurement of BMD and T-scores, with REMS recording consistently lower values. The discrepancy group exhibited a higher incidence of multiple vertebral fractures and increased vascular calcification than the non-discrepancy group. Multivariate analysis indicated that diabetes mellitus, severe vertebral fractures, and increased abdominal aortic calcification scores were significantly associated with discrepancies in lumbar spine T-scores.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that REMS may offer a more accurate measurement of BMD, overcoming the overestimation of BMD by DXA owing to factors such as vertebral deformities, abdominal aortic calcification, and diabetes mellitus.

Secondary fracture and mortality risk with very high fracture risk osteoporosis and proximal femoral fracture

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate secondary fracture and mortality rates, and risk factors in patients with proximal femoral fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study on female patients with proximal femoral fractures who underwent surgical treatment between April 2020 and March 2021. Postoperative follow-ups were performed at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month intervals to determine the secondary fracture and mortality rates, and the risk factors and its influence were examined.

RESULTS

Of the 279 registered patients, 144 patients (51.6%) were diagnosed with very high fracture risk osteoporosis. The postoperative osteoporosis rate exceeded 96%; however, osteoanabolic agents were used sparingly. The risk factor of both secondary fracture and mortality was very high fracture risk osteoporosis, and secondary fractures within 12 months were markedly occurred. Secondary fracture rates increased as the number of matched very high fracture risk osteoporosis criteria increased. Notably, secondary fractures and mortality were recorded in 21.4% and 23.5% of the patients who met all criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Over half of the female patients with proximal femoral fractures had very high fracture risk osteoporosis. Although, very high fracture risk osteoporosis demonstrated a notably increased risk of secondary fractures, particularly at 12 months post-surgery, the use of osteoanabolic agents was substantially low. Collectively, our findings highlight the need to consider the risk of very high fracture risk osteoporosis, expand the use of medications to include osteoanabolic agents, and reconsider the current healthcare approach for proximal femoral fractures.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Zoledronate Acid or Denosumab After Switching from Romosozumab in Japanese Postmenopausal Patients

We aimed to compare the efficacy of switching from romosozumab (RMAb) to denosumab (DMAb) or zoledronic acid (Zol) with respect to changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism. We also aimed to determine predictors of changes in BMD among patients who received sequential therapy from RMAb. One hundred patients who received RMAb therapy were recruited for this study. A total 49 patients received bisphosphonate (BP) pre-treatment and 51 received active vitamin D3 analog pre-treatment or no treatment. Forty-two patients were switched to Zol (BP-RMAb-Zol; 20 and RMAb-Zol; 22), and 58 patients were switched to DMAb (BP-RMAb-DMAb; 29 and RMAb-DMAb; 29). Longitudinal changes in bone metabolic markers (P1NP and TRACP-5b) and BMD were also evaluated. In the BP-RMAb-Zol group, TRACP-5b increased after administration of Zol, and the mean BMD of the lumbar spine (LS) was significantly lower than those in the BP-RMAb-DMAb, RMAb-Zol and RMAb-DMAb groups at 24 months. The % changes in BMD of the LS after 24 months were associated with TRACP-5b values at baseline and at 12 months in patients who received Zol therapy, and with TRACP-5b value at baseline in patients who received DMAb therapy. The DMAb follow-on regimen could be considered more effective than Zol as a sequential agent for the enhancement of BMD after RMAb in patients with BP pretreatment. TRACP-5b, especially the baseline value, may predict the efficacy of sequential therapy from RMAb, as well as previous treatments.

Real-world persistence of twice-weekly teriparatide and factors associated with the discontinuation in patients with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

A 28.2 μg twice-weekly formulation of teriparatide (2/W-TPD) was developed to provide comparably high efficacy for osteoporosis to a 56.5 μg once-weekly formulation while improving the safety and persistence rate. In the current study, we aimed to elucidate the real-world persistence of 2/W-TPD and to identify the factors associated with the discontinuation of 2/W-TPD in patients with severe osteoporosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 90 patients who were treated with 2/W-TPD at three hospitals in Japan. Patient information was collected, including age, sex, distance to the hospital, family structure, comorbidities, previous treatment for osteoporosis, timing of the injection, side effects and duration of 2/W-TPD treatment, barthel index (BI), and bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. We examined the factors influencing 2/W-TPD discontinuation using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The 12 month completion rate of 2/W-TPD therapy was 47.5%. The Cox hazard analysis identified side effects [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 14.59, P < 0.001], low BMD of the femoral neck (HR = 0.04, P = 0.002), and morning injection (HR = 3.29, P = 0.006) as risk factors influencing the discontinuation of 2/W-TPD. Other variables, including age, did not contribute to the continuation of 2/W-TPD.

CONCLUSION

One year continuation rate of 2/W-TPD was higher than the previously reported value of the once-weekly formulation in real-world setting, probably due to the lower incidence of side effects. Introducing injection of 2/W-TPD may further improve the persistence of TPD therapy for osteoporosis.

Accuracy of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool for judging pharmacotherapy initiation for primary osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine whether the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX^®) is useful in assessing the criteria for the initiation of pharmacotherapy for primary osteoporosis based on the current diagnostic criteria in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 614 patients aged ≥ 40 years (average, 77.0 years) who were eligible for primary osteoporosis evaluation. Bone mineral density measurements of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck using ALPHYS LF (FUJIFILM, Tokyo, Japan) and imaging studies involving the lumbar spine were obtained and the FRAX^® scores of each patient were calculated with and without the T-score of the femoral neck. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis method was used to calculate the cut-off FRAX^® scores with reference to the criteria for initiating pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis; the accuracies of both FRAX^® scores were compared.

RESULTS

The FRAX^® score calculated with the T-score was more accurate for hip fracture risk assessment [cut-off value 5.5%; the area under the curve (AUC) 0.946] than for major osteoporotic fracture risk assessment (cut-off value 17.0%; AUC 0.924) in judging the criteria (p = 0.001). Conversely, the FRAX^® score calculated without the T-score was equally accurate for hip fracture risk assessment (AUC 0.796) and major osteoporotic fracture risk assessment (AUC 0.806) (p = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

The FRAX^® score can accurately assess the criteria for initiating pharmacotherapy for primary osteoporosis based on the current Japanese diagnostic criteria, especially when the T-score is used.

Impact of bone mineral density in reducing fracture risk in patients receiving alendronate plus alfacalcidol therapy

BACKGROUD

Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) are a potential surrogate marker for fracture endpoints in clinical trials. However little is known whether the increase in BMD in response to combination treatment with alendronate plus alfacalcidol is associated with fracture risk reduction. We aimed to evaluate the impact of BMD on fracture risk in osteoporosis patients, using the data from the randomized clinical trial comparing alendronate plus alfacalcidol with alendronate alone.

METHODS

We selected 412 patients with two or more prevalent vertebral fractures and who had BMD measurements at baseline and after 6, 12, and/or 24 months out of 2022 patients from the database of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial. Patients in this subset who received combination treatment with alendronate plus alfacalcidol had shown a lower risk of fracture than patients treated with alendronate alone. We used Poisson regression model analysis to calculate the proportion of treatment effect (PTE) that was attributable to BMD increases in patients receiving combination treatment.

RESULTS

The highest PTE attributable to changes in BMD was 1.2% in patients with a BMD increase of 3% or more in the lumbar spine. For BMD measurements of the radius, the highest PTE was 2.8% with a BMD increase of 0% or more. For BMD measurements of the metacarpal bone, the highest PTE was 1.2% with a BMD increase of 3% or more. In patients with a BMD greater than or equal to 70% of the young adult mean in the lumbar spine, the PTE attributable to BMD was 0.2%. In patients with a BMD greater than or equal to 70% of the young adult mean in the radius, the PTE attributable to BMD was 0.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The additional effects of alfacalcidol in reducing fracture risk do not likely result from increased BMD; other mechanisms remain a possibility.

Effects after starting or switching from bisphosphonate to romosozumab or denosumab in Japanese postmenopausal patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the longitudinal changes in bone metabolic markers and bone mineral density (BMD) after starting or switching from bisphosphonate (BP) to romosozumab (ROMO) or denosumab (DENO) therapies over 12 months and to determine predictors that establish associations with changes in BMD among the patients received the ROMO therapy.

METHODS

Postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with a high risk of fracture-154 in total-were recruited; their therapies were switched to ROMO or DENO from BP/naïve or vitamin D (ND) (ND-ROMO: 43, BP-ROMO: 38, ND-DENO: 38, and BP-DENO: 35). Longitudinal changes in bone metabolic markers and BMD were evaluated.

RESULTS

ROMO groups showed significant increases in BMD of the lumbar spine at 6 and 12 months and femoral neck at 12 months compared to the DENO groups. Although BP-ROMO showed significant increase in the lumbar spine BMD compared to BP-DENO, there were no significant differences in femoral neck and total hip BMDs between BP-ROMO and BP-DENO. Among the ROMO groups, % changes of BMD from baseline to 12 months were associated with bone metabolic markers at baseline and changes in TRACP-5b from baseline to 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

ROMO continuously increased BMD for 12 months and performed better than DENO. On the other hand, effects of ROMO switched from BP on BMD of femoral neck and total hip were almost same with DENO. Bone metabolic markers at baseline and changes in TRACP-5b from baseline to 3 months may predict the efficacy of ROMO after 12 months of administration.

Denosumab versus romosozumab for postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment

Denosumab and romosozumab, a recently approved new drug, are effective and widely known molecular-targeted drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment. However, no studies have directly compared their therapeutic effects or safety in postmenopausal osteoporosis. This retrospective observational registry study compared the efficacy of 12-month denosumab or romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. The primary outcome was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine. Secondary outcomes included BMD changes at the total hip and femoral neck, changes in bone turnover markers, and adverse events. Propensity score matching was employed to assemble patient groups with similar baseline characteristics. Sixty-nine patients each received either denosumab or romosozumab for 12 months. The mean 12-month percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD was 7.2% in the denosumab group and 12.5% in the romosozumab group, indicating a significant difference between the groups. The percentage changes in BMD at both the total hip and femoral neck were also significantly higher at 12 months in the romosozumab group than in the denosumab group. In denosumab patients, bone formation and bone resorption markers were significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months from baseline. In the romosozumab group, the bone formation marker was significantly increased at 6 months and then returned to baseline, while the bone resorption marker was significantly decreased at both time points. Adverse events were few and predominantly minor in both groups, with no remarkable difference in the incidence of new vertebral fractures. Romosozumab showed a higher potential for improving BMD than denosumab in this clinical study of postmenopausal osteoporosis patient treatment.

Romosozumab followed by denosumab in Japanese women with high fracture risk in the FRAME trial

INTRODUCTION

This post-hoc analysis of the FRAME study investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of romosozumab followed by denosumab in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis at high fracture risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from Japanese women with a high fracture risk participating in the international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 FRAME study were analysed. High risk of fracture was defined as ≥ 1 fragility fracture with bone mineral density (BMD) ≤ - 2.5 standard deviations [SD], > 2 prevalent vertebral fractures, prevalent semiquantitative grade 3 vertebral fracture, or lumbar spine BMD < - 3.3 SD. Endpoints included incidence of new vertebral fracture at 12, 24 and 36 months and percentage change from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck.

RESULTS

187 Japanese subjects at high risk of fracture were enrolled in FRAME. Incidence of new vertebral fractures was lower with romosozumab/denosumab vs. placebo/denosumab at 12, 24 and 36 months (relative risk reduction at all timepoints: 84%; p = 0.056). BMD increases at 12, 24 and 36 months were greater in subjects receiving romosozumab/denosumab than placebo/denosumab (lumbar spine: 16.3%, 21.5% and 23.2% vs 0.4%, 8.1% and 10.4%; total hip: 4.9%, 7.9% and 8.9% vs 0.4%, 2.8% and 4.1%; femoral neck: 4.8%, 7.6% and 8.1% vs 0.3%, 3.3% and 3.7%, respectively; all p < 0.001 vs placebo/denosumab). Adverse events were generally balanced between groups.

CONCLUSION

Romosozumab/denosumab in Japanese subjects at high risk of fracture resulted in significant BMD gains and numerically lower vertebral fracture rate vs. placebo/denosumab at all timepoints measured.

Simple methods for the estimation and sensitivity analysis of principal strata effects using marginal structural models: Application to a bone fracture prevention trial

In randomized clinical trials, it is often of interest to estimate the effect of treatment on quality of life (QOL), in addition to those on the event itself. When an event occurs in some patients prior to QOL score assessment, investigators may compare QOL scores between patient subgroups defined by the event after randomization. However, owing to postrandomization selection bias, this analysis can mislead investigators about treatment efficacy and result in paradoxical findings. The recent Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT-02), which compared the benefits of a combination therapy for fracture prevention with those of a monotherapy, exemplifies the case in point; the average QOL score was higher in the combination therapy arm for the unfractured subgroup but was lower for the fractured subgroup. To address this issue, principal strata effects (PSEs), which are treatment effects estimated within subgroups of individuals stratified by potential intermediate variable, have been discussed in the literature. In this paper, we describe a simple procedure for estimating the PSEs using marginal structural models. This procedure utilizes SAS code for the estimation. In addition, we present a simple sensitivity analysis method for examining the resulting estimates. The analyses of JOINT-02 data using these methods revealed that QOL scores were higher in the combination therapy arm than in the monotherapy arm for both subgroups.

Impact of communication between physicians and dentists on the incidence of jaw osteonecrosis caused by bone anti-resorptives

Dental management of osteoporosis patients on anti-resorptive therapy can be challenging for both the dentist and physician because of the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). This editorial reflects on the paper written by Tagushi et al that expressed a relative lack of communication between health care providers when treating osteoporosis patients. Osteoporosis-related bone fractures can be debilitating and occasionally lethal, but management with anti-resorptives is vital while cognizant of the complication of ONJ that can also negatively impact patient’s quality of life.

Impact of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw on Osteoporosis Treatment in Japan: Results of a Questionnaire-Based Survey by the Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP) Research Group

Dentists request a discontinuation of antiresorptive agents, such as bisphosphonate, before and after tooth extractions to prevent osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). However, little is known about how this affects ONJ and osteoporosis treatment and how medical professionals and dentists cooperate to treat ONJ in patients with osteoporosis. This study aimed to clarify the impact of ONJ on osteoporosis treatment in Japan. A structured questionnaire including 14 key clinical queries was sent to 488 medical professionals as part of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-04, and 206 responses were received. A total of 173 respondents had received discontinuation requests from dentists. Of these, 28 respondents experienced 30 adverse events including ten fractures and one incidence of ONJ. The respondents who refused discontinuation requests observed no cases of ONJ. Approximately 16 % of respondents had patients who discontinued osteoporosis treatment, following a requested drug discontinuation, after tooth extraction. Dentists requested discontinuations for many medications that were not associated with the incidence of ONJ. Approximately 76 % of respondents had never requested oral health care from dentists before osteoporosis treatment and 72 % reported no cooperation between dentists and medical professionals in their region. Our results suggest that drug discontinuation may increase adverse events and disturb osteoporosis treatment without completely preventing ONJ. Currently, both medical professionals and dentists in Japan still continue to recommend their own treatment position. A forum to share information about ONJ among medical professionals, dentists, and patients is required.

Comparison of expert and nonexpert physicians in the assessment of vertebral fractures using the semiquantitative method in Japan

Assessment of vertebral fracture is critically important for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of the semiquantitative (SQ) method in the assessment of vertebral fractures in Japanese clinical practice. Forty-four physicians (seven experts and 37 nonexperts) assessed the spinal radiographs of 40 patients participating in the Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP) Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-02 at the baseline, 12 months, and 24 months using the SQ method. The proportion of diagnosed fracture cases per spine was higher in the nonexpert group than in the expert group at each time point, and was especially high in the upper thoracic spine (T4-T6). The least mean squares spinal fracture index was significantly higher in the nonexpert group than in the expert group for all time points. The kappa statistics were also higher in the expert group than in the nonexpert group for all vertebral levels at all time points. Assessment of vertebral fractures using the SQ method tended to be overestimated by nonexpert physicians compared with the experts, with poor nonexpert interobserver reliability and well-matched expert interobserver reliability. Conscious efforts to avoid overestimation and to obtain higher reliability with the SQ method should be made to achieve more precise diagnoses and treatment of osteoporosis in Japanese clinical practice.

Responsiveness of the Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life questionnaire in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Background

The Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life (JOQOL) questionnaire measures quality of life in Japanese patients with osteoporosis. However, several important aspects of the psychometric properties of individual domains, including responsiveness, have not been addressed to enable valid clinical application. This analysis examined the internal and external responsiveness of the JOQOL questionnaire.

Methods

This was a post hoc analysis of a 24-week prospective postmarketing study of raloxifene (60 mg/day) administered to postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis (JapicCTI-070465). Internal responsiveness was assessed using Standardized Response Mean (SRM) statistics and changes in JOQOL domain scores. Patients were also stratified into those who did or did not achieve a minimal clinically important change (MCIC) in pain, assessed by a visual analogue scale for pain (VAS pain): comparisons were made between treated patients who achieved VAS pain reduction ≥ 20 mm versus VAS pain reduction < 20 mm. External responsiveness was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) for changes in JOQOL domain scores with Short Form-8 Health Survey and European Quality of Life Instrument scores.

Results

Of 506 patients analyzed, 421 had a baseline value for VAS pain; of these, 152 patients (36.1%) had a MCIC, whereas 264 patients (62.7%) did not. The JOQOL domains pain, overall health, and falls/psychological factors had small to moderate SRM values (0.3-0.5) in all patients, but consistently showed significantly larger changes in patients whose pain score changes exceeded the MCIC. Together, these findings suggest some degree of internal responsiveness for these domains. However, activities of daily living domain had a SRM value as low as 0.2, and recreation/social activities and posture/physique domains had SRM values close to 0. Moderate correlation (defined as r ≥ 0.4 to < 0.6) was noted between the domains pain, activities of daily living, and overall health and some Short Form-8 Health Survey subscales and the European Quality of Life total score, suggesting external responsiveness of these domains.

Conclusions

The inconsistent responsiveness among individual JOQOL domains in treated patients suggests the need for improving several JOQOL domains, especially the activities of daily living, recreation/social activities and posture/physique domains, before application to clinical research.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-014-0178-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effects of salubrinal on development of osteoclasts and osteoblasts from bone marrow-derived cells

Background

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease leading to an increased risk of bone fracture. Using a mouse osteoporosis model induced by administration of a receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), salubrinal was recently reported as a potential therapeutic agent. To evaluate the role of salubrinal in cellular fates as well as migratory and adhesive functions of osteoclast/osteoblast precursors, we examined the development of primary bone marrow-derived cells in the presence and absence of salubrinal. We addressed a question: are salubrinal’s actions more potent to the cells isolated from the osteoporotic mice than those isolated from the control mice?

Methods

Using the RANKL-injected and control mice, bone marrow-derived cells were harvested. Osteoclastogenesis was induced by macrophage-colony stimulating factor and RANKL, while osteoblastogenesis was driven by dexamethasone, ascorbic acid, and β-glycerophosphate.

Results

The results revealed that salubrinal suppressed the numbers of colony forming-unit (CFU)-granulocyte/macrophages and CFU-macrophages, as well as formation of mature osteoclasts in a dosage-dependent manner. Salubrinal also suppressed migration and adhesion of pre-osteoclasts and increased the number of CFU-osteoblasts. Salubrinal was more effective in exerting its effects in the cells isolated from the RANKL-injected mice than the control. Consistent with cellular fates and functions, salubrinal reduced the expression of nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1) as well as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase.

Conclusions

The results support the notion that salubrinal exhibits significant inhibition of osteoclastogenesis as well as stimulation of osteoblastogenesis in bone marrow-derived cells, and its efficacy is enhanced in the cells harvested from the osteoporotic bone samples.

Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2012 revision

In 1995, the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Metabolism (now the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research) established the Osteoporosis Diagnostic Criteria Review Committee. Following discussion held at the 13th scientific meeting of the Society in 1996, the Committee, with the consensus of its members, proposed diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis. The Committee revised those criteria in 1998 and again in 2000. The Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research and Japan Osteoporosis Society Joint Review Committee for the Revision of the Diagnostic Criteria for Primary Osteoporosis aimed at obtaining international consistency and made a revised edition based on the new findings in 2012.

Effects of alendronate plus alfacalcidol in osteoporosis patients with a high risk of fracture: the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT) - 02

OBJECTIVES

The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial to clarify the efficacy and safety of alendronate plus alfacalcidol versus alendronate alone in a clinical setting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis who were aged 70 years or older and had several risk factors for incident fractures. The primary endpoint was prevention of incident fractures, and the anti-fracture efficacy was evaluated in relation to the baseline serum 25(OH)D level.

RESULTS

A total of 2164 patients were randomized to alendronate plus alfacalcidol (combination therapy) or alendronate alone (monotherapy). Although the overall difference in the incidence of vertebral fracture between the two groups was not significant, the combination therapy group had a significantly reduced risk of vertebral fractures after the first 6 months (HR, 0.53). In subgroup analyses, the combination therapy group was superior in the strata of number of prevalent vertebral fractures of ≥2 (HR, 0.51) and grade 3 of prevalent vertebral fractures (HR, 0.55). The rate of non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fractures was significantly lower in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group during the follow-up period (HR, 0.31). A lower baseline 25(OH)D level was associated with a higher incidence of non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fractures (HR, 3.42) despite alendronate use. Although one patient given the combination therapy had mild hypercalcemia, serious hypercalcemia and unknown adverse events were not encountered. Because of the limitations presented in this study, these results may not apply to female patients with longer than 2 years of treatments, and to male osteoporosis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination therapy was no more effective for overall vertebral fracture prevention. However, subgroup analysis has shown that it was more effective for fracture prevention in patients with severe vertebral deformity, multiple prevalent vertebral fractures, and for non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fracture prevention.