Continuous renal replacement therapy with a polymethyl methacrylate membrane hemofilter suppresses inflammation in patients after open-heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

Clinical outcome of intraoperative hemodialysis using a hemoconcentrator during cardiopulmonary bypass for dialysis-dependent patients

OBJECTIVES

The basic materials and structure of a hemoconcentrator incorporated into cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits are similar to those of hemodialyzers. Gravity drainage hemodiafiltration (GHDF) is an easy-to-use intraoperative renal replacement therapy (RRT) that utilizes a hemoconcentrator. This study aimed to verify whether GHDF can correct electrolyte imbalance and remove uremic toxins in dialysis-dependent patients and to evaluate the clinical outcomes of GHDF by comparing it with a conventional method of dilutional ultrafiltration (DUF).

METHODS

This study retrospectively compared perioperative clinical values of 41 dialysis-dependent patients (21 patients with GHDF and 20 patients with DUF) who underwent open-heart surgery. Changes in serum parameters before and after passing through the hemoconcentrator were also compared.

RESULTS

Compared to DUF, GHDF significantly lowered potassium, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine levels at the outflow of the hemoconcentrator. Less catecholamine was needed to wean CPB in GHDF than in DUF. The P/F ratio (arterial blood oxygen pressure/inhaled oxygen concentration) at the end of surgery was significantly higher in GHDF than in DUF (450.8 ± 149.7 vs. 279.3 ± 153.5; p < 0.001). Postoperative intubation time was shorter in GHDF than in DUF (8.3 ± 5.9 vs. 18.7 ± 16.1 h; p = 0.006). The major morbidity and mortality rates were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

GHDF removed both potassium and uremic toxins more efficiently than DUF in dialysis-dependent patients. Less catecholamine was needed to wean CPB using GHDF. It improved the immediate postoperative respiratory function and enabled earlier extubation. GHDF is a novel and effective option for intraoperative RRT in dialysis-dependent patients undergoing open-heart surgery.

Rationale for sequential extracorporeal therapy (SET) in sepsis

Sepsis and septic shock remain drivers for morbidity and mortality in critical illness. The clinical picture of patients presenting with these syndromes evolves rapidly and may be characterised by: (a) microbial host invasion, (b) establishment of an infection focus, (c) opsonisation of bacterial products (e.g. lipopolysaccharide), (d) recognition of pathogens resulting in an immune response, (e) cellular and humoral effects of circulating pathogen and pathogen products, (f) immunodysregulation and endocrine effects of cytokines, (g) endothelial and organ damage, and (h) organ crosstalk and multiple organ dysfunction. Each step may be a potential target for a specific therapeutic approach. At various stages, extracorporeal therapies may target circulating molecules for removal. In sequence, we could consider: (a) pathogen removal from the circulation with affinity binders and cartridges (specific), (b) circulating endotoxin removal by haemoperfusion with polymyxin B adsorbers (specific), (c) cytokine removal by haemoperfusion with sorbent cartridges or adsorbing membranes (non-specific), (d) extracorporeal organ support with different techniques for respiratory and cardiac support (CO₂ removal or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), and renal support (haemofiltration, haemodialysis, or ultrafiltration). The sequence of events and the use of different techniques at different points for specific targets will likely require trials with endpoints other than mortality. Instead, the primary objectives should be to achieve the desired action by using extracorporeal therapy at a specific point.

Cytokine Blood Filtration Responses in COVID-19

The real issue with the COVID-19 pandemic is that a rapidly increasing number of patients with life-threatening complications are admitted in hospitals and are not well-administered. Although a limited number of patients use the intensive care unit (ICU), they consume medical resources, safety equipment, and enormous equipment with little possibility of rapid recovery and ICU discharge. This work reviews effective methods of using filtration devices in treatment to reduce the level of various inflammatory mediators and discharge patients from the ICU faster. Extracorporeal technologies have been reviewed as a medical approach to absorb cytokines. Although these devices do not kill or remove the virus, they are a promising solution for treating patients and their faster removal from the ICU, thus relieving the bottleneck.

Involvement of ionic interactions in cytokine adsorption of polyethyleneimine-coated polyacrylonitrile and polymethyl methacrylate membranes in vitro

Polyethyleneimine-coated polyacrylonitrile (AN69ST) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) membranes are effective cytokine-adsorbing hemofilters; however, the cytokine-adsorption mechanism remains elusive. This study investigated the involvement of ionic interactions in cytokine adsorption to a negatively charged AN69ST membrane and neutral-charged PMMA membrane. Experimental hemofiltration was performed for 30 min in a closed-loop circulation system using AN69ST and PMMA hemofilters. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-8 concentrations in the test solutions were measured at baseline and at 10 min and 30 min into hemofiltration. To investigate the involvement of ionic interactions in cytokine adsorption, cytokine clearance (CL) was calculated at 10 min into hemofiltration and with three types of solutions at various pH levels (7.6, 7.2, and 6.8). During AN69ST hemofiltration, the CLs of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 were 38 ± 6 mL/min, 23 ± 7 mL/min, and 78 ± 3 mL/min, respectively, demonstrating a relationship with their respective isoelectric points. During PMMA hemofiltration, the CL of IL-6 peaked at 31 ± 76 mL/min, with no relationship observed between the CL and isoelectric point. When the pH of the test solution shifted from 7.6 to 6.8, the CLs of TNF-α, IL6, and IL-8 increased in the AN69ST hemofilter; whereas, no such trend was observed in the PMMA hemofilter. These results indicated that Ionic interactions play a role in cytokine adsorption by the AN69ST membrane but not the PMMA membrane and highlight the clinical relevance of this finding, as well as the potential practical applications for further hemofilter design.