Das (PR_E-)AUD2IT-Schema als Rückgrat für eine strukturierte Notfallversorgung und Dokumentation nichttraumatologischer kritisch kranker Schockraumpatienten

[TeleCOVID Hessen: implications for the development of new indication areas]

BACKGROUND

During the SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic, the TeleCOVID application was developed in Hessen to connect the intensive care units via telemedicine. After successful implementation, the application should be extended to other indication areas in intensive care medicine.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate other indications for which the application can be used and which technical requirements are associated with this.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To answer these questions, guideline-based expert interviews were conducted, which were evaluated using a qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The survey showed that TeleCOVID can be extended to other indication areas in intensive care. Numerous technical requirements were formulated that should be specifically considered when the application is further developed.

CONCLUSIONS

The telemedical networking of intensive care units generates added value for the actors involved. However, it is important that the data is collected in the best possible standardized and structured way. The communication process should be automated wherever possible to minimise the workload for the participating persons.

[Monitoring of cardiovascular emergencies in the emergency department]

In the emergency department, patients with potential or confirmed cardiovascular diseases constitute a significant portion of the overall patient population. Monitoring for cardiovascular surveillance of these patients, until and during the diagnostics and acute therapy often presents an interdisciplinary and interprofessional challenge. This is partly due to the limited number of monitoring spaces in emergency departments. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a differentiated indication for cardiovascular monitoring. Despite limited monitoring resources, ensuring high patient safety is paramount. The correct approach holds significant prognostic importance. For patients requiring extended monitoring, especially using invasive systems, close personnel monitoring is essential, in addition to appropriate staffing and medical equipment. The overarching goal for such patients is to ensure prompt transfer to a suitable destination unit. The provision of an intensive care bed for further care within one hour is aimed for according to the directive of the Federal Joint Committee on staged emergency care in hospitals. Often, at the beginning of the emergency department visit, a definitive diagnosis is not yet established - this is addressed accordingly with symptom-oriented considerations. The present review article focuses on the practical Implementation and modalities of monitoring, as well as its application in a selection of cardiovascular diagnoses in the emergency department.

Acute Onset of Impaired Consciousness

BACKGROUND

Mortality in patients with acute onset of impaired consciousness is high: as many as 10% do not survive. The spectrum of differential diagnoses is wide, and more than one underlying condition is found in one-third of all cases. In this article, we describe a structured approach to patients with acute onset of impaired consciousness in the emergency department.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective search of PubMed and on the AWMF guidelines on the most common causes of impairment of consciousness.

RESULTS

Impairments of consciousness are classified as quantitative (reduced wakefulness) or qualitative (abnormal content of consciousness). Of all such cases, 45-50% have a primary neurological cause, and approximately 20% are of metabolic or infectious origin. Some cases are due to intoxications, cardiovas - cular disorders, or psychiatric disorders. Important warning signs ("red flags") in acute onset of impaired consciousness are a hyperacute onset, pupillomotor disturbances, focal neurologic deficits, meningismus, headache, tachycardia and tachypnea (with or without fever), muscle contractions, and skin abnormalities. Patients with severely impaired consciousness should be initially treated in the shock room according to the ABCDE scheme.

CONCLUSION

Acute onset of impaired consciousness is a medical emergency. Red flags must be rapidly recognized and treatment initiated immediately. Patients with severely impaired consciousness of new onset and uncertain cause, status epilepticus, lack of protective reflexes, or a new, acute neuro - logic deficit should be admitted via the resuscitation room.

[Clinical acute and emergency medicine curriculum-focus on internal medicine : Recommendations for advanced training in internal medicine in the emergency department]

In Germany, physicians qualify for emergency medicine by combining a specialty medical training-e.g. internal medicine-with advanced training in emergency medicine according to the statutes of the State Chambers of Physicians largely based upon the Guideline Regulations on Specialty Training of the German Medical Association. Internal medicine and their associated subspecialities represent an important column of emergency medicine. For the internal medicine aspects of emergency medicine, this curriculum presents an overview of knowledge, skills (competence levels I-III) as well as behaviours and attitudes allowing for the best treatment of patients. These include general aspects (structure and process quality, primary diagnostics and therapy as well as indication for subsequent treatment; resuscitation room management; diagnostics and monitoring; general therapeutic measures; hygiene measures; and pharmacotherapy) and also specific aspects concerning angiology, endocrinology, diabetology and metabolism, gastroenterology, geriatric medicine, hematology and oncology, infectiology, cardiology, nephrology, palliative care, pneumology, rheumatology and toxicology. Publications focussing on contents of advanced training are quoted in order to support this concept. The curriculum has primarily been written for internists for their advanced emergency training, but it may generally show practising emergency physicians the broad spectrum of internal medicine diseases or comorbidities presented by patients attending the emergency department.

Discussion paper: implications for the further development of the successfully in emergency medicine implemented AUD2IT-algorithm

The AUD2IT-algorithm is a tool to structure the data, which is collected during an emergency treatment. The goal is on the one hand to structure the documentation of the data and on the other hand to give a standardised data structure for the report during handover of an emergency patient. AUD2IT-algorithm was developed to provide residents a documentation aid, which helps to structure the medical reports without getting lost in unimportant details or forgetting important information. The sequence of anamnesis, clinical examination, considering a differential diagnosis, technical diagnostics, interpretation and therapy is rather an academic classification than a description of the real workflow. In a real setting, most of these steps take place simultaneously. Therefore, the application of the AUD2IT-algorithm should also be carried out according to the real processes. A big advantage of the AUD2IT-algorithm is that it can be used as a structure for the entire treatment process and also is entirely usable as a handover protocol within this process to make sure, that the existing state of knowledge is ensured at each point of a team-timeout. PR-E-(AUD2IT)-algorithm makes it possible to document a treatment process that, in principle, does not have to be limited to the field of emergency medicine. Also, in the outpatient treatment the PR-E-(AUD2IT)-algorithm could be used and further developed. One example could be the preparation and allocation of needed resources at the general practitioner. The algorithm is a standardised tool that can be used by healthcare professionals of any level of training. It gives the user a sense of security in their daily work.

[Handover protocols in the emergency department]

Patient handovers are a vital juncture in the flow of medical information, and regardless of the mode of handover-oral, written, or combined-it often poses a risk of information loss. This could potentially jeopardize patient safety and influences subsequent treatment. The exchange of information in emergency care settings between paramedics and emergency personnel is particularly prone to errors due to situational specifics such as high ambient noise, the involvement of multiple disciplines, and the need for urgent decision-making in life-threatening situations. As handover training is not yet universally incorporated into education and ongoing training programs, there is a high degree of variability in how it is carried out in practice. However, strategies aimed at enhancing the handover process carry substantial potential for improving staff satisfaction, process quality, and possibly even having a positive prognostic impact.

[Monitoring of emergency cardiovascular patients in the emergency department : Consensus paper of the DGK, DGINA and DGIIN]

Patients with potential or proven cardiovascular diseases represent a relevant proportion of the total spectrum in the emergency department. Their monitoring for cardiovascular surveillance until the diagnostics and acute treatment are initiated, often poses an interdisciplinary and interprofessional challenge, because resources are limited, nevertheless a high level of patient safety has to be ensured and the correct procedure has a major prognostic significance. This consensus paper provides an overview of the practical implementation, the modalities of monitoring and the application in a selection of cardiovascular diagnoses. The article provides specific comments on the clinical presentations of acute coronary syndrome, acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, hypertensive emergency events, syncope, acute pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrhythmia. The level of evidence is generally low as no randomized trials are available on this topic. The recommendations are intended to supplement or establish local standards and to assist all physicians, nursing personnel and the patients to be treated in making decisions about monitoring in the emergency department.

[Intensive care of patients with [infarct-related] cardiogenic shock : Abridged version of the S1 guideline]

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases and (infarct-related) cardiogenic shock are among the most frequent causes of death in Germany. Adequate clinical care often poses great challenges for hospitals. The complex care of patients in a multi-professional team places high demands on all those involved in the care process. Since nurses in particular are in close contact with patients and play a decisive role in shaping and controlling therapy, a national (intensive) care guideline is urgently needed.

METHODS

Within the framework of the guideline programme of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), an S1 guideline was developed with the participation of six professional societies and published in May 2022. The guideline group defined relevant topics, which were processed through a systematic literature search in peer-reviewed journals. Based on the S1 classification, no separate evidence review was conducted. A formal consensus-building process was used to classify the recommendations.

RESULTS

The guideline contains 36 recommendations ranging from nursing care in the central emergency department to the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, intensive care unit and follow-up care. In addition, recommendations are made on the necessary qualifications and structural requirements in the respective areas in order to ensure a high-quality (nursing) care process.

CONCLUSION

This is the first national intensive care guideline. It is aimed at nurses involved in the care of patients with (infarct-related) cardiogenic shock. The guideline is valid until 30.12.2026.

[Management of Critically Ill Non-traumatic Patients in the Emergency Department]

Resuscitation room management of non-traumatic critically ill patients in the emergency department comprises approximately 1.5% of all emergency department visits. Critically ill patients are usually brought to the hospital by emergency medical services, where they are first examined, given initial treatment, stabilized and then transported for further in-hospital treatment. Resuscitation room management plays a key role at the interface of the out-of-hospital and in-hospital treatment chains. While the structured care of traumatological patients has been established at a very high level for decades, the care of non-traumatic critically ill patients within the framework of resuscitation room care has only come into focus in recent years and is only now being implemented in some places with professional concepts. Emergency departments at all levels of care are equipped to provide structured care for non-traumatologic shock room patients. To professionalize non-traumatic resuscitation room management, the creation of uniform standards from alerting criteria, to equipment and staffing, as well as the establishment of a uniform resuscitation room management algorithm is required. The (PRE_E-)AUD2IT-algorithm provides a structure for the non-traumatic care of critically ill patients in the resuscitation room and includes preparation, resource retrieval, handover, initial care, diagnostics, differential diagnoses and the interpretation of examination findings. This overview focuses on the management of critically ill non-traumatic patients in respect to the resuscitation room care concept.