1
|
Desai K, Miteva M. Recent Insight on the Management of Lupus Erythematosus Alopecia. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2021; 14:333-347. [PMID: 33833540 PMCID: PMC8020452 DOI: 10.2147/ccid.s269288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Lupus erythematosus (LE) is a chronic autoimmune condition with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations. Alopecias, both non-scarring and scarring, frequently occur in the context of LE and can assume several different patterns. Furthermore, alopecia occurring with LE may be considered LE-specific if LE-specific features are present on histology; otherwise, alopecia is considered non-LE-specific. Non-scarring alopecia is highly specific to systemic LE (SLE), and therefore has been regarded as a criterion for the diagnosis of SLE. Variants of cutaneous LE (CLE), including acute, subacute, and chronic forms, are also capable of causing hair loss, and chronic CLE is an important cause of primary cicatricial alopecia. Other types of hair loss not specific to LE, including telogen effluvium, alopecia areata, and anagen effluvium, may also occur in a patient with lupus. Lupus alopecia may be difficult to treat, particularly in cases that have progressed to scarring. The article summarizes the types of lupus alopecia and recent insight regarding their management. Data regarding the management of lupus alopecia are sparse and limited to case reports, and therefore, many studies including in this review report the efficacy of treatments on CLE as a broader entity. In general, for patients with non-scarring alopecia in SLE, management is aimed at controlling SLE activity with subsequent hair regrowth. Topical medications can be used to expedite recovery. Prompt treatment is crucial in the case of chronic CLE due to potential for scarring and irreversible damage. First-line therapies for CLE include topical corticosteroids and oral antimalarials, with or without oral corticosteroids as bridging therapy. Second and third-line systemic treatments for CLE include methotrexate, retinoids, dapsone, mycophenolate mofetil, and mycophenolate acid. Additional topical and systemic medications as well as physical modalities used for the treatment of lupus alopecia and CLE are discussed herein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karishma Desai
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mariya Miteva
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uzuncakmak TK, Bayazit S, Askin O, Engin B, Ugurlu S, Sar M, Serdaroglu S. Alendronate induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus successfully treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Dermatol Ther 2020; 33:e14477. [PMID: 33125828 DOI: 10.1111/dth.14477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a distinct subtype of lupus erythematosus (LE) representing specific clinical and serological features. Almost 20%-30% of the cases with SCLE are predicted to associated with medications. Thiazide diuretics, terbinafine, antiepileptic, and proton pump inhibitors are the best-known drugs to induce drug-related SCLE. Herein we want to present a 65-year-old female with alendronate induced SCLE, resistant to classical therapies, and respond well to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), suggesting that IVIG could be an alternative treatment in patients resistant to classical treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tugba Kevser Uzuncakmak
- Department of Dermatology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Samet Bayazit
- Department of Dermatology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozge Askin
- Department of Dermatology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Burhan Engin
- Department of Dermatology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Serdal Ugurlu
- Department of Rheumatology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Sar
- Department of Pathology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Server Serdaroglu
- Department of Dermatology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yan D, Borucki R, Sontheimer RD, Werth VP. Candidate drug replacements for quinacrine in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med 2020; 7:7/1/e000430. [PMID: 33082164 PMCID: PMC7577055 DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2020-000430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a disfiguring and potentially disabling disease that causes significant morbidity in patients. Antimalarials are an important class of medication used to treat this disease and have been the first-line systemic therapy since the 1950s. Quinacrine, in particular, is used as an adjuvant therapy to other antimalarials for improved control of CLE. Quinacrine is currently unavailable in the USA, which has taken away an important component of the treatment regimen of patients with CLE. This paper reviews the evidence of available local and systemic therapies in order to assist providers in choosing alternative treatments for patients who previously benefited from quinacrine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisy Yan
- Department of Dermatology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert Borucki
- Department of Dermatology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Richard D Sontheimer
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Victoria P Werth
- Department of Dermatology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA .,Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guicciardi F, Atzori L, Marzano AV, Tavecchio S, Girolomoni G, Colato C, Villani AP, Kanitakis J, Mitteldorf C, Satta R, Cribier B, Gusdorf L, Rossi MT, Calzavara-Pinton P, Bielsa I, Fernandez-Figueras MT, Kempf W, Filosa G, Pilloni L, Rongioletti F. Are there distinct clinical and pathological features distinguishing idiopathic from drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus? A European retrospective multicenter study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 81:403-411. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
5
|
Blake SC, Daniel BS. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A review of the literature. Int J Womens Dermatol 2019; 5:320-329. [PMID: 31909151 PMCID: PMC6938925 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Knowledge with regard to the pathogenesis of lupus erythematosus has progressed rapidly over the past decade, and with it has come promising new agents for the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematous (CLE). Classification of CLE is performed using clinical features and histopathologic findings, and is crucial for determining prognosis and choosing therapeutic options. Preventative therapy is critical in achieving optimal disease control, and patients should be counseled on sun-safe behavior and smoking cessation. First-line therapy includes topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, with antimalarial therapy. Traditionally, refractory disease was treated with oral retinoids, dapsone, and other oral immunosuppressive drugs, but new therapies are emerging with improved side effect profiles and efficacy. Biologic agents, such as belimumab and ustekinumab, have been promising in case studies but will require larger trials to establish their role in routine therapy. Other novel therapies that have been trialed successfully include spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors and fumaric acid esters. Finally, new evidence has been published recently that describes safer dosing regimens in thalidomide and lenalidomide, both effective medications for CLE. Given the chronic disease course of CLE, long-term treatment-related side effects must be minimized, and the introduction of new steroid-sparing agents is encouraging in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Clare Blake
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,St. George Department of Dermatology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Benjamin Silas Daniel
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,St. George Department of Dermatology, Sydney, Australia.,St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jarrett P, Werth VP. A review of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: improving outcomes with a multidisciplinary approach. J Multidiscip Healthc 2019; 12:419-428. [PMID: 31213824 PMCID: PMC6549666 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s179623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus encompasses a spectrum of cutaneous disease with different phenotypes, and it potentially intersects with many disciplines in medicine. This review examines the epidemiology, clinical subtypes, pathology, psychology and intervention options for this disorder. It is important to understand the psychological distress that cutaneous lupus can cause and if needed actively investigate this possibility with the patient. Careful liaison between disciplines will achieve the optimum outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Jarrett
- Department of Dermatology, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Victoria P Werth
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dey-Rao R, Sinha AA. In silico Analyses of Skin and Peripheral Blood Transcriptional Data in Cutaneous Lupus Reveals CCR2-A Novel Potential Therapeutic Target. Front Immunol 2019; 10:640. [PMID: 30984198 PMCID: PMC6450170 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous lesions feature prominently in lupus erythematosus (LE). Yet lupus and its cutaneous manifestations exhibit extraordinary clinical heterogeneity, making it imperative to stratify patients with varying organ involvement based on molecular criteria that may be of clinical value. We conducted several in silico bioinformatics-based analyses integrating chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE)-skin and blood expression profiles to provide novel insights into disease mechanisms and potential future therapy. In addition to substantiating well-known prominent apoptosis and interferon related response in both tissue environments, the overrepresentation of GO categories in the datasets, in the context of existing literature, led us to model a “disease road-map” demonstrating a coordinated orchestration of the autoimmune response in CCLE reflected in three phases: (1) initiation, (2) amplification, and (3) target damage in skin. Within this framework, we undertook in silico interactome analyses to identify significantly “over-connected” genes that are potential key functional players in the metabolic reprogramming associated with skin pathology in CCLE. Furthermore, overlapping and distinct transcriptional “hot spots” within CCLE skin and blood expression profiles mapping to specified chromosomal locations offer selected targets for identifying disease-risk genes. Lastly, we used a novel in silico approach to prioritize the receptor protein CCR2, whose expression level in CCLE tissues was validated by qPCR analysis, and suggest it as a drug target for use in future potential CCLE therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rama Dey-Rao
- Department of Dermatology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Animesh A Sinha
- Department of Dermatology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tenti S, Fabbroni M, Mancini V, Russo F, Galeazzi M, Fioravanti A. Intravenous Immunoglobulins as a new opportunity to treat discoid lupus erythematosus: A case report and review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev 2018; 17:791-795. [PMID: 29885539 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a chronic dermatological disease that can lead to scarring, alopecia and dyspigmentation, if not properly treated. Actually, no drugs are specifically approved for the treatment of CLE, although the first-line therapy usually consists of photoprotection associated to topical or oral steroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). In cases of DLE refractory to these medications, many other agents have been employed, such as dapsone, methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, biologic drugs and Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG). We described the case of a DLE patient resistant to combination therapy with steroid and HCQ who was successfully treated with cyclical IVIG therapy. The treatment with IVIG resulted rapidly effective with persistent efficacy and low rates of relapses, although more cycles of IVIG are needed to achieve a stable clinical remission. We also discussed the beneficial and promising effects of IVIG in patients with Cutaneous Lupus reporting the previously published data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Tenti
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Marta Fabbroni
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Virginia Mancini
- Pathology Section, Department of Medical Biotechnology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Filomena Russo
- Dermatology Section, Department of Clinical Medicine and Immunological Science, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Mauro Galeazzi
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Antonella Fioravanti
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Intravenous immunoglobulins for treatment of connective tissue diseases in dermatology. Wien Med Wochenschr 2017; 168:213-217. [DOI: 10.1007/s10354-017-0595-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
10
|
Kuhn A, Aberer E, Bata-Csörgő Z, Caproni M, Dreher A, Frances C, Gläser R, Klötgen HW, Landmann A, Marinovic B, Nyberg F, Olteanu R, Ranki A, Szepietowski JC, Volc-Platzer B. S2k guideline for treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus - guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016; 31:389-404. [PMID: 27859683 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a rare inflammatory autoimmune disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations. To date, no therapeutic agents have been licensed specifically for patients with this disease entity, and topical and systemic drugs are mostly used 'off-label'. The aim of the present guideline was to achieve a broad consensus on treatment strategies for patients with CLE by a European subcommittee, guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and supported by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). In total, 16 European participants were included in this project and agreed on all recommendations. Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment for localized CLE, and further topical agents, such as calcineurin inhibitors, are listed as alternative first-line or second-line topical therapeutic option. Antimalarials are recommended as first-line and long-term systemic treatment in all CLE patients with severe and/or widespread skin lesions, particularly in patients with a high risk of scarring and/or the development of systemic disease. In addition to antimalarials, systemic corticosteroids are recommended as first-line treatment in highly active and/or severe CLE. Second- and third-line systemic treatments include methotrexate, retinoids, dapsone and mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate acid, respectively. Thalidomide should only be used in selected therapy-refractory CLE patients, preferably in addition to antimalarials. Several new therapeutic options, such as B-cell- or interferon α-targeted agents, need to be further evaluated in clinical trials to assess their efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with CLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kuhn
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials (IZKS), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Division of Immunogenetics, Tumor Immunology Program, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E Aberer
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Z Bata-Csörgő
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - M Caproni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Critical Care Section of Dermatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - A Dreher
- Evidence-Based Medicine Frankfurt, Institute for General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - C Frances
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - R Gläser
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - H-W Klötgen
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital Bern - University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - A Landmann
- Division of Immunogenetics, Tumor Immunology Program, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Marinovic
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Center Zagreb and School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - F Nyberg
- Institution for Clinical Sciences, Unit for Dermatology, Karolinska Institutet at Danderyd Hospital (KIDS), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R Olteanu
- Department of Dermatology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - A Ranki
- Department of Skin and allergic diseases, Inflammation Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - J C Szepietowski
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - B Volc-Platzer
- Department of Dermatology, Donauspital, University affiliated Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Presto JK, Hejazi EZ, Werth VP. Biological therapies in the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2016; 26:115-118. [PMID: 27687023 DOI: 10.1177/0961203316670731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune skin disease occurring in association with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although antimalarials are widely used as the first-line systemic agent, refractory cases may benefit from additional immunomodulators, immunosuppressives, and biologics. An interest in biological therapies for CLE has emerged in recent years due to novel insight into the pathogenesis of CLE. These targets include B cells, T cells, and cytokines that are involved in immune system pathways. Currently belimumab is the only biological therapy approved for SLE and no biologic has been approved for CLE. While there is a paucity of high quality evidence with regard to biologics in CLE management, trials are currently being performed to determine their role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Presto
- 1 Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Philadelphia), USA.,2 Department of Dermatology at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - E Z Hejazi
- 1 Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Philadelphia), USA.,2 Department of Dermatology at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - V P Werth
- 1 Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Philadelphia), USA.,2 Department of Dermatology at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hejazi EZ, Werth VP. Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: An Update on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol 2016; 17:135-46. [PMID: 26872954 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-016-0173-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) includes a broad range of dermatologic manifestations, which may or may not be associated with systemic disease. Recent studies in this area continue to shape our understanding of this disease and treatment options. Epidemiologic studies have found an incidence of CLE of 4.30 per 100,000, which approaches similar analysis for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although there have been extensive efforts to define SLE, the classification of CLE and its subgroups remains a challenge. Currently, diagnosis relies on clinical and laboratory findings as well as skin histology. The Cutaneous Lupus Area and Severity Index™ (CLASI™) is a validated measure of disease activity and damage. CLE pathogenesis is multifactorial and includes genetic contributions as well as effects of ultraviolet (UV) light. Immune dysregulation and aberrant cell signaling pathways through cytokine cascades are also implicated. Patient education and avoidance of triggers are key to disease prevention. Antimalarials and topical steroids continue to be the standard of care; however, immunosuppressants, thalidomide analogs and monoclonal antibodies are possible systemic therapies for the treatment of recalcitrant disease.
Collapse
|
13
|
Intravenous Immunoglobulins: Mode of Action and Indications in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Dermatoses. Int J Inflam 2016; 2016:3523057. [PMID: 26885437 PMCID: PMC4739470 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3523057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), a mixture of variable amounts of proteins (albumin, IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgE antibodies), as well as salt, sugar, solvents, and detergents, are successfully used to treat a variety of dermatological disorders. For decades, IVIGs have been administered for treatment of infectious diseases and immune deficiencies, since they contain natural antibodies that represent a first-line defense against pathogens. Today their indication has expanded, including the off-label therapy for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In dermatology, IVIGs are administered for treatment of different disorders at different therapeutic regimens, mostly with higher doses then those administered for treatment of infectious diseases. The aim of this prospective review is to highlight the indications, effectiveness, side effects, and perspectives of the systemic treatment with IVIGs for patients with severe, life-threatening, and resistant to conventional therapies autoimmune or inflammatory dermatoses.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ky C, Swasdibutra B, Khademi S, Desai S, Laquer V, Grando SA. Efficacy of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Monotherapy in Patients with Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Results of Proof-of-Concept Study. Dermatol Reports 2015; 7:5804. [PMID: 25918617 PMCID: PMC4387332 DOI: 10.4081/dr.2015.5804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2015] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune skin disease. Evidence-based therapy for CLE is lacking in the most part. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is being increasingly utilized as off-label therapy for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory conditions, especially in dermatology. The usefulness of IVIg in CLE is not well established. The goal of the present study was to obtain the proof-of-concept evidence that IVIg can control acute CLE and thus replace current systemic immunosuppressive therapy that causes severe side effects and adverse reactions. Sixteen patients who tried and failed various systemic treatments for CLE were screened and consented to use IVIg as a monotherapy. The IVIg was administered at 500 mg/kg/day on 4 consecutive days up to a total of 2 g/kg/month for 3 months, and the subjects were monitored for additional 6 months off any drug for a possible relapse. The cumulative results revealed an overall improvement, as evinced by a decrease of both objective and subjective measures of disease activity. The most sensitive and specific objective and subjective instruments for assessment of the therapeutic effect of IVIg were CLASI-A (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index) measuring disease activity and Skindex-29 scores, respectively. The CLASI-A score dropped down from the initial value taken as 100%, and remained in the range of approximately 70% until the last visit. Three patients (18.8%) had a temporary flare of CLE symptoms but recovered within a month from the relapse. No serious side effects and adverse reactions occurred. Thus, IVIg monotherapy in CLE allowed to achieve: i) rapid and persistent decreased in disease activity; ii) steady improvement of patients’ quality of life assessed by Skindex-29; iii) low relapse rate; and iv) mild nature and short duration of relapses. Since healing was maintained for months after IVIg treatment, it is possible that the IVIgtriggered molecular events mediating the therapeutic action of IVIg that continued to unfold after the end of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Ky
- Department of Dermatology, University of California , Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Brian Swasdibutra
- Department of Dermatology, University of California , Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Shaadi Khademi
- Department of Dermatology, University of California , Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Sheetal Desai
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California , Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Vivian Laquer
- Department of Dermatology, University of California , Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Sergei A Grando
- Department of Dermatology, University of California , Irvine, CA, USA ; Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California , Irvine, CA, USA ; Institute for immunology, University of California , Irvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus is a heterogeneous autoimmune condition that can significantly impact quality of life. Treatment is focused on reducing clinical inflammation and preventing scarring. The choice of treatment should be guided based on the severity of disease. Mild or localized disease can be treated with sun protection and topical agents. Antimalarials are the initial treatment of choice if systemic therapy is required. Patients with severe or unresponsive disease can also be treated with a number of other immunomodulating or immunosuppressive agents. Clinicians should be aware of their potential adverse effects and appropriate dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher B Hansen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kuhn A, Ruland V, Bonsmann G. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: Update of therapeutic options. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65:e195-213. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2010] [Revised: 05/28/2010] [Accepted: 06/04/2010] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
17
|
Abstract
In patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and mild skin involvement, local therapy consisting of topically applied pharmacological agents, e.g., topical/intralesional steroids, may be sufficient. Recent reports have also shown efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitors in patients with CLE, particularly on the face. Special attention receives consistent sun protection through photoresistant clothing and application of light-shielding substances with highly potent chemical or physical UVA- and UVB-protective filters. These substances should be applied in sufficient amount (ca. 2 mg/cm(2)) at least 20-30 minutes before sun exposure in order to avoid induction and exacerbation of cutaneous lesions. The mainstay of treatment for disfiguring and widespread skin manifestations in patients with CLE, irrespective of the subtype of the disease, is antimalarial agents. Our understanding of the use of combinations of antimalarials and proper dosing according to the ideal bodyweight limits problems with toxicity. Further therapies, such as methotrexate, or retinoids, dapsone, mycophenolate mofetil, and thalidomide in selected cases, can be helpful for patients with resistant disease; however, side effects need to be taken into consideration. Recent advances in biotechnology resulted in the development of novel systemic agents, but randomized controlled trials are necessary for the approval of new therapeutic strategies in CLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kuhn
- Department of Dermatology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
This article focuses on the management of discoid lupus erythematosus, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and systemic lupus erythematosus when the usual therapeutic arsenal such as oral antimalarial drugs and topical/oral steroids fail or provide insufficient treatment efficacy. Many of the treatments listed are the same or similar to each other because of similarities in the pathogenesis of various subtypes of cutaneous lupus. The clinical challenge is to determine the indications for topical versus systemic therapy, and to also identify the scenarios when combined therapy is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haydee M Knott
- Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A-61, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kivity S, Katz U, Daniel N, Nussinovitch U, Papageorgiou N, Shoenfeld Y. Evidence for the use of intravenous immunoglobulins--a review of the literature. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2010; 38:201-69. [PMID: 19590986 PMCID: PMC7101816 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-009-8155-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) were first introduced in the middle of the twentieth century for the treatment of primary immunodeficiencies. In 1981, Paul Imbach noticed an improvement of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, in patients receiving IVIg for immunodeficiencies. This opened a new era for the treatment of autoimmune conditions with IVIg. Since then, IVIg has become an important treatment option in a wide spectrum of diseases, including autoimmune and acute inflammatory conditions, most of them off-label (not included in the US Food and Drug Administration recommendation). A panel of immunologists and internists with experience in IVIg therapy reviewed the medical literature for published data concerning treatment with IVIg. The quality of evidence was assessed, and a summary of the available relevant literature in each disease was given. To our knowledge, this is the first all-inclusive comprehensive review, developed to assist the clinician when considering the use of IVIg in autoimmune diseases, immune deficiencies, and other conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaye Kivity
- Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Torchia D, Caproni M, Massi D, Chella A, Fabbri P. Paraneoplastic toxic epidermal necrolysis-like subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Dermatol 2010; 35:455-6. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03240.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
21
|
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) may present in a variety of clinical forms. Three recognized subtypes of cutaneous LE are acute cutaneous LE (ACLE), subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE), and chronic cutaneous LE (CCLE). ACLE may be localized (most often as a malar or 'butterfly' rash) or generalized. Multisystem involvement as a component of systemic LE (SLE) is common, with prominent musculoskeletal symptoms. SCLE is highly photosensitive, with predominant distribution on the upper back, shoulders, neck, and anterior chest. SCLE is frequently associated with positive anti-Ro antibodies and may be induced by a variety of medications. Classic discoid LE is the most common form of CCLE, with indurated scaly plaques on the scalp, face, and ears, with characteristic scarring and pigmentary change. Less common forms of CCLE include hyperkeratotic LE, lupus tumidus, lupus profundus, and chilblain lupus. Common cutaneous disease associated with, but not specific for, LE includes vasculitis, livedo reticularis, alopecia, digital manifestations such as periungual telangiectasia and Raynaud phenomenon, photosensitivity, and bullous lesions. The clinical presentation of each of these forms, their diagnosis, and the inter-relationships between cutaneous LE and SLE are discussed. Common systemic findings in SLE are reviewed, as are diagnostic strategies, including histopathology, immunopathology, serology, and other laboratory findings. Treatments for cutaneous LE initially include preventive (e.g. photoprotective) strategies and topical therapies (corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors). For skin disease not controlled with these interventions, oral antimalarial agents (most commonly hydroxychloroquine) are often beneficial. Additional systemic therapies may be subdivided into conventional treatments (including corticosteroids, methotrexate, thalidomide, retinoids, dapsone, and azathioprine) and newer immunomodulatory therapies (including efalizumab, anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab). We review evidence for the use of these medications in the treatment of cutaneous LE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hobart W Walling
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Erceg A, Bovenschen HJ, van de Kerkhof PCM, de Jong EMJG, Seyger MMB. Efficacy and safety of pulsed dye laser treatment for cutaneous discoid lupus erythematosus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:626-32. [PMID: 19293010 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2008] [Revised: 10/23/2008] [Accepted: 11/18/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of chronic discoid lupus erythematosus (CDLE) with a pulsed dye laser (PDL) has shown promising results, although outcomes in previous studies were not validated and laser parameters were inconsistent. OBJECTIVE We conducted an open prospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of PDL for the treatment of recalcitrant CDLE, using a validated scoring method and a fixed treatment schedule. METHODS Twelve patients with active CDLE lesions were treated with PDL (585 nm, fluence 5.5 J/cm(2), spot size 7 mm) 3 times with an interval of 6 weeks followed by a 6-week follow-up period. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by 3 observers using the validated Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI). Cosmetic results and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS A significant decline in "active" CLASI was observed after 6 weeks, after 12 weeks, and at follow-up. Baseline active CLASI was 4.4 +/- 0.2 (mean +/- SEM), reaching 1.3 +/- 0.3 after follow-up (P < .0001). Individual scores for erythema and scaling/hypertrophy significantly declined 6 weeks after treatment. The "damage" CLASI (dyspigmentation, scarring, and atrophy) did not show any significant change during or after therapy. The observed clinical improvement was confirmed by two independent observers by clinical assessment of photographs (r = 0.87 and r = 0.89; both P < .05). The treatment was well tolerated, only minimal pain was reported, and the cosmetic result was fair. LIMITATIONS Small sample size and short follow-up duration were limitations. CONCLUSION PDL treatment is an effective and safe therapy for patients with refractory CDLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelina Erceg
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|