Prolonged remission is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a GIRRCS (Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica e Sperimentale) study

The communication GAP between patients and clinicians and the importance of patient reported outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) imposes a great burden on the lives of patients. Patients' and physicians' concerns about the disease diverge considerably. Physicians focus on controlling disease activity to prevent damage accrual, while patients focus on symptoms that impact on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). We explored the physicians' and patients' perspective and the potential role of Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs). Physicians are aware of the theoretical usefulness of PROs to collect information deriving from the patients' perspective. However, they often do not know how to interpret and use these questionnaires in a real shared therapeutic strategy. For the patients, it's important to be seen as a whole person with a true consideration of how they feel and function. Strategies to help bridge the communication gap could include: better use of time during visits, preparing for the consultation, a more understandable lay language used by the doctor, a dedicated nurse.

Risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an umbrella review

Cardiovascular disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains one of the most common causes of death and is caused by several factors, including both traditional and disease-specific risk factors. We aimed to systematically appraise the evidence of cardiovascular disease risk factors focusing on the SLE population. The protocol for this umbrella review is registered in PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42020206858). A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to June 22, 2022, for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes that examined cardiovascular disease risk factors in patients with SLE. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies using the "Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTER 2)" tool. Of the 102 identified articles, nine systematic reviews were included in this umbrella review. All included systematic reviews were assessed as critically low quality according to the AMSTER 2 tool. The traditional risk factors identified in this study were older age, male sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and a family history of cardiovascular disease. SLE-specific risk factors were long-term disease duration, lupus nephritis, neurological disorders, high disease activity, organ damage, use of glucocorticoids, azathioprine, and antiphospholipid antibodies, including anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant. This umbrella review identified some cardiovascular disease risk factors in patients with SLE; however, the study quality of all included systematic reviews was critically low. Key Points • We examined the evidence of cardiovascular disease risk factors focusing on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. • We found that long-term disease duration, lupus nephritis, neurological disorders, high disease activity, organ damage, use of glucocorticoids, azathioprine, and antiphospholipid antibodies, including anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant, were cardiovascular disease risk factors among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. • The review indicates the need for well-validated and high-quality future reviews that assess major adverse cardiovascular events as an outcome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Factors associated with cardiovascular events in systemic lupus erythematosus in a monocentric cohort with up to 40 years of follow-up

OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. Several traditional and disease-specific risk factors have been shown to correlate with the occurrence of cardiovascular events (CVE) in patients with SLE. However, results of previous studies are diverse. The objectives of this study were to report number, type and those factors associated with CVE in patients with SLE in a large, single-center, ethnically diverse cohort with a long follow-up duration.

METHODS

Medical records of patients treated at the Lupus Clinic at University College London Hospital (UCLH) between 1979 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Data about CVE, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, demographic and disease features, and treatment history were collected. Only patients with complete available information were included in the study. Regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with CVE.

RESULTS

Four hundred and nineteen patients were included in the study. Maximum follow-up length was 40 years. Seventy-one (17%) patients had at least one CVE. Multivariable analysis showed that only antiphospholipid antibody positivity (p-value<0.001) was associated with CVE. When analysing different types of CVE, antiphospholipid antibodies were specifically associated with both venous thromboembolic events (p-value<0.001) and cerebrovascular events (p-value=0.007). Dedicated subanalyses revealed that cumulative glucocorticoid dose (p-value=0.010) and a diagnosis of SLE before 2000 (p-value<0.001) were significantly associated with CVE.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular disease is highly prevalent among patients with SLE and is associated with antiphospholipid antibodies, glucocorticoid therapy, and diagnosis before 2000.

Treat-to-Target in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Reality or Pipe Dream

Treat-to-target is a therapeutic approach based on adjustments to treatment at set intervals in order to achieve well-defined, clinically relevant targets. This approach has been successfully applied to many chronic conditions, and in rheumatology promising results have emerged for rheumatoid arthritis. For systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), defining the most meaningful treatment targets has been challenging, due to disease complexity and heterogeneity. Control of disease activity, the reduction of damage accrual and the patient's quality of life should be considered as the main targets in SLE, and several new drugs are emerging to achieve these targets. This review is focused on describing the target to achieve in SLE and the methods to do so, and it is also aimed at discussing if treat-to-target could be a promising approach also for this complex disease.

Major determinants of prolonged remission in systemic lupus erythematosus: retrospective study over a 41+ year period

OBJECTIVES

To investigate predictors of sustained complete remission (CR) for 3 and 5 years, minimum.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study from January 1978 to December 2019, including systemic lupus erythmatosus (SLE) patients who attended the Lupus Clinic in a tertiary hospital, for at least 3 years. We used the BILAG score and serological profile to classify patients into CR, serologically active clinically quiescent (SACQ) and serological remission (SR). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate predictors of CR and Kaplan-Meier curves were obtained.

RESULTS

We included 564 patients; 15% achieved CR, 7% SACQ and 15% SR. Some 63% attained no remission. In the CR group, 73% sustained the remission for 5 years or more. Patients who did not reach any kind of sustained remission died significantly earlier (P < 0.001). Cumulative survival figures at 5, 10, 20 and 30 years were 100, 100, 94 and 90%, respectively, for CR patients and 96, 93, 77 and 58%, respectively, for patients in the no-remission group. Significant predictors of CR were White ethnicity [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.16 (95% CI 1.30-3.59); P = 0.003]; older age at diagnosis (>32 years) [HR 1.92 (1.24-2.97); P = 0.003]; absence of renal involvement [HR 2.55 (1.39-4.67); P = 0.002]; and of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) [HR 4.92 (1.55-15.59); P = 0.007].

CONCLUSION

Patients not achieving any kind of sustained remission have a higher risk of early mortality. White ethnicity, older age at diagnosis, absence of renal involvement and of APS were significantly associated with CR. Predictors for sustained CR do not change whether a 3-year or 5-year period is applied.

2-Arachidonoylglycerol Reduces the Production of Interferon-Gamma in T Lymphocytes from Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Background: the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) plays a pivotal role in immune cells regulation. The plasma levels of 2-AG are increased in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and correlate with disease activity. Moreover, in plasmacytoid dendritic cells from SLE patients, 2-AG is able to control the production of type 1 interferon (IFN) through CB₂ activation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of 2-AG on T lymphocytes from SLE patients. Methods: peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from SLE participants and age- and sex-matched healthy donors (HD) were isolated by Ficoll–Hypaque density-gradient centrifugation. The PBMCs were treated with increasing concentrations of 2-AG, and AM251 and AM630 were used to antagonize CB₁ and CB_2, respectively. Flow cytometry was used to assess the expression of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, IFN-ɣ, IL-4, and IL-17A. Results: 2-AG (1 μM) decreased IFN-ɣ expression (p = 0.0005) in the Th1 lymphocytes of SLE patients. 2-AG did not modulate the cytokine expression of any other T lymphocyte population from either SLE or HD. Treatment with both 2-AG and AM630 increased the IFN-ɣ expression in Th1 lymphocytes of SLE patients (p = 0.03). Discussion: 2-AG is able to modulate type 2 IFN production from CD4+ T lymphocytes from SLE patients through CB₂ activation.

Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a remaining challenge

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, which affects a wide range of organs with variable clinical features. Involvement of the nervous system is a challenging and multifaceted manifestation of the disease, presenting with a broad range of symptoms. Neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE) encompasses seven syndromes of the peripheral and 12 of the central nervous system, associated with a high disease burden. Despite advances in the management of SLE, NP manifestations still pose a challenge to clinicians. First, diagnosis and attribution to SLE is difficult due to the lack of specific biomarkers or imaging modalities. Second, therapeutic options are limited, and evidence is mainly based on case reports and expert consensus, as clinical trials are sparse. Moreover, no validated outcome measure on disease activity exists. Current recommendations for treatment include supportive as well as immunosuppressive medication, depending on the type and severity of manifestations. As NPSLE manifestations are increasingly recognized, a broader spectrum of therapeutic options can be expected.

Endothelial function and endothelial progenitor cells in systemic lupus erythematosus

The observations that traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors fail to fully account for the excessive cardiovascular mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared with the general population have prompted in-depth investigations of non-traditional, SLE-related risk factors that contribute to cardiovascular complications in patients with SLE. Of the various perturbations of vascular physiology, endothelial dysfunction, which is believed to occur in the earliest step of atherosclerosis, has been extensively investigated for its contribution to CVD risk in SLE. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), which play a crucial part in vascular repair, neovascularization and maintenance of endothelial function, are quantitatively and functionally reduced in patients with SLE. Yet, the lack of a unified definition of EPCs, standardization of the quantity and functional assessment of EPCs as well as endothelial function measurement pose challenges to the translation of endothelial function measurements and EPC levels into prognostic markers for CVD in patients with SLE. This Review discusses factors that contribute to CVD in SLE, with particular focus on how endothelial function and EPCs are evaluated currently, and how EPCs are quantitatively and functionally altered in patients with SLE. Potential strategies for the use of endothelial function measurements and EPC quantification as prognostic markers of CVD in patients with SLE, and the limitations of their prognostication potential, are also discussed.

EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To develop recommendations for cardiovascular risk (CVR) management in gout, vasculitis, systemic sclerosis (SSc), myositis, mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

METHODS

Following European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) standardised procedures, a multidisciplinary task force formulated recommendations for CVR prediction and management based on systematic literature reviews and expert opinion.

RESULTS

Four overarching principles emphasising the need of regular screening and management of modifiable CVR factors and patient education were endorsed. Nineteen recommendations (eleven for gout, vasculitis, SSc, MCTD, myositis, SS; eight for SLE, APS) were developed covering three topics: (1) CVR prediction tools; (2) interventions on traditional CVR factors and (3) interventions on disease-related CVR factors. Several statements relied on expert opinion because high-quality evidence was lacking. Use of generic CVR prediction tools is recommended due to lack of validated rheumatic diseases-specific tools. Diuretics should be avoided in gout and beta-blockers in SSc, and a blood pressure target <130/80 mm Hg should be considered in SLE. Lipid management should follow general population guidelines, and antiplatelet use in SLE, APS and large-vessel vasculitis should follow prior EULAR recommendations. A serum uric acid level <0.36 mmol/L (<6 mg/dL) in gout, and disease activity control and glucocorticoid dose minimisation in SLE and vasculitis, are recommended. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in SLE because it may also reduce CVR, while no particular immunosuppressive treatment in SLE or urate-lowering therapy in gout has been associated with CVR lowering.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations can guide clinical practice and future research for improving CVR management in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

Cardiovascular Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To review cardiovascular outcomes (CVE) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that evolves over time.

RECENT FINDINGS

Inception cohorts now report long-term data, and large population registries add to our knowledge. Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity remain high with a risk ratio of 2-3. SLE disease activity-related inflammation accounts for higher CVE incidence ratio in the first year following diagnosis with accelerated atherosclerosis contributing to CVE in about a quarter to a third of the patients later in the disease course. Immunomodulation and disease control are associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Validation of modified risk stratification tools and studies evaluating primary prevention with aspirin and hydroxychloroquine are reported. Increased awareness of high mortality associated with cardiac inflammation, improved outcomes with early disease control, aggressive management of risk factors, hypertension, obesity, and high cholesterol with modifying risk stratification will result in more favorable outcomes in SLE patients.

Was Antiphospholipid Syndrome a Risk Factor of Stroke? A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by thrombosis. This systemic review and meta-analysis was to verify the hypothesis that APS might increase the risk of stroke. Studies were identified after literature searching of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale Cohort Studies (NOQAS-C) was used to assess the quality of studies. The pooled effect with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated by random-effect model. I-square (I²) was used to test heterogeneity. Funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias. A total of 17 cohort studies with overall high quality were included. There was no publication bias. Pooled hazard ratio of stroke occurrence in APS patients was 1.76 (1.39-2.21) with low heterogenicity and stable result from sensitivity analysis. In the analysis of subgroups, pooled risk ratios of stroke occurrence in patients with only positive antibodies of APS diagnosis were 1.75 (0.99-3.09), which for the APS patients with other autoimmune diseases were 14.70 (7.56-28.56). APS might be a risk factor of stroke, especially in patients with other autoimmune diseases.

Cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

There is a well-known increased risk for cardiovascular disease that contributes to morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Major adverse cardiovascular events and subclinical atherosclerosis are both increased in this patient population. While traditional cardiac risk factors do contribute to the increased risk that is seen, lupus disease-related factors, medications, and genetic factors also impact the overall risk. SLE-specific inflammation, including oxidized lipids, cytokines, and altered immune cell subtypes all are likely to play a role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic plaques. Research is ongoing to identify biomarkers that can help clinicians to predict which SLE patients are at the greatest risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). While SLE-specific treatment regimens for the prevention of cardiovascular events have not been identified, current strategies include minimization of traditional cardiac risk factors and lowering of overall lupus disease activity.

Achieving remission or low disease activity is associated with better outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Remission and low disease activity (LDA) have been proposed as the treatment goals for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Several definitions for each have been proposed in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of remission/LDA according to various definitions on relevant outcomes in patients with SLE.

METHODS

This systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses using PubMed (1946-week 2, April 2021), Cochrane library (1985-week 2, week 2, April 2021) and EMBASE (1974-week 2, April 2021). We included longitudinal and cross-sectional studies in patients with SLE reporting the impact of remission and LDA (regardless their definition) on mortality, damage accrual, flares, health-related quality of life and other outcomes (cardiovascular risk, hospitalisation and direct costs). The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

We identified 7497 articles; of them, 31 studies met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Some articles reported a positive association with survival, although this was not confirmed in all of them. Organ damage accrual was the most frequently reported outcome, and remission and LDA were reported as protective of this outcome (risk measures varying from 0.04 to 0.95 depending on the definition). Similarly, both states were associated with a lower probability of SLE flares, hospitalisations and a better health-related quality of life, in particular the physical domain.

CONCLUSION

Remission and LDA are associated with improvement in multiple outcomes in patients with SLE, thus reinforcing their relevance in clinical practice.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020162724.

Quantitative MRI adds to neuropsychiatric lupus diagnostics

OBJECTIVE

Attributing neuropsychiatric manifestations to SLE is often challenging. Brain white matter lesions are frequent in SLE at MRI, but their diagnostic role is unclear. Here, we assessed whether white matter lesions count, volume and distribution measurement can help in the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE).

METHODS

Brain dual-echo and 3D T1-weighted sequences were acquired from 32 patients with SLE and 32 healthy controls with a 3 T-scanner and employed to derive T2-hyperintense lesion volume (T2LV), number (T2LN) and probability maps (LPM) using a semi-automatic local thresholding segmentation technique. NPSLE was classified as per the ACR nomenclature, the Italian Society for Rheumatology algorithm and by clinical impression. Clinical descriptors including the SLE International Collaborating Clinics/ACR damage index (SDI) were also recorded.

RESULTS

Higher T2LV were observed in SLE vs healthy controls (P < 0.001) and in NPSLE vs other SLE (P =0.006). Patients with NPSLE also had higher T2LN (P =0.003) compared with other SLE. In SLE, T2LPM revealed a high prevalence of lesions in the splenium of the corpus callosum, right superior longitudinal fasciculus and right corona radiata. T2LV and T2LN correlated with SLE duration (rho = 0.606; P <0.001 and rho = 0.483; P =0.005, respectively) and age (rho = 0.478; P =0.006 and rho = 0.362; P = 0.042, respectively). T2LV also correlated with SDI (rho = 0.352; P =0.048). SLE patients with fatigue had lower T2LN (P =0.038) compared with patients without fatigue. Thresholds of T2LV ≥ 0.423 cm3 or of T2LN ≥ 12 were associated with definite NPSLE and improved the classification of patients with possible NPSLE per clinical impression.

CONCLUSION

Brain white matter lesions (WML) quantitation adds to NPSLE diagnostics.

Understanding Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Toward Better Treatment and Prevention

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) carries a significant risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The prevalence of premature CVD is especially noteworthy because it occurs in premenopausal women with SLE who would otherwise have very low rates of CVD. While traditional risk factors likely play a role in development of CVD in the setting of SLE, they do not fully explain the excess risk. The pathogenesis of CVD in SLE is not fully understood, but the inflammatory nature of SLE is believed to be a key factor in accelerating atherosclerosis. Systemic inflammation may lead to an abnormal lipid profile with elevated triglycerides, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and dysfunctional high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Additionally, the inflammatory milieu of SLE plasma promotes endothelial dysfunction and vascular injury, early steps in the progression of atherosclerotic CVD. Despite the overall headway that has been achieved in treating lupus, innovative therapeutics specifically targeting the progression of atherosclerosis within the lupus population are currently lacking. However, there have been advancements in the development of promising modalities for diagnosis of subclinical atherosclerosis and detection of high CVD risk patients. Due to the significant impact of CVD on morbidity and mortality, research addressing prevention and treatment of CVD in SLE needs to be prioritized. This review explores the intricate interplay of SLE-specific properties that contribute to atherosclerosis and CVD within this population, as well as screening methods and possible therapies.

Long-term remission in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Remission has been introduced as a desirable outcome and the primary target of treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The purpose of this study was to identify the number of patients in remission and the long-term outcome of the disease and their predictors.

METHOD

Of the 379 patients in our SLE Database, a total of 193 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Remission was definition according to the definitions of remission in SLE. Three levels of remission were defined, including remission on-treatment, remission off-treatment and complete remission. In addition, we have defined a sustained remission for each level of remission in which the remission should last at least 5 years.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 96 months, remission on-treatment and off-treatment, and complete remission were obtained in 49.2%, 38.9% and 19.2% of patients, respectively. Predictors of remission on-treatment in multivariate regression analysis were adherence to therapy and remission induction during 6 months after treatment. Predictors of remission off-treatment were age ≥40 at the time of analysis and remission induction during 6 months after treatment. Poor outcome (SLE Damage Index ≥1) was observed in 28% of the patients. Age at disease onset <30, kidney and nervous system involvement and SLEDAI-2K ≥ 11 at the cohort entry were the risk factors of poor outcome in multivariate analysis. However, sustained remission on-treatment had a negative association with poor outcome.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with glucocorticoids, antimalarials, immunosuppressants and biologics in sequential or in combination may cause durable remission. Patients with durable remission have significantly lower organ damage.

Which patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in remission can withdraw low dose steroids? Results from a single inception cohort study

BACKGROUND

A progressive tapering until withdrawal of glucocorticoids (GC) is considered one of the main goals of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) management. However, which patient may be a candidate for safe GC withdrawal has not been determined yet. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of low-dose GC withdrawal in SLE patients in remission and to identify predictors of flares.

METHODS

Eligible patients were SLE patients in prolonged clinical remission defined by a cSLEDAI = 0 for at least 2 years and on a stable SLE treatment (including daily 5 mg prednisone). Flares were defined by SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index. Predictors of flares after GC withdrawal were analyzed by Cox regression.

RESULTS

We selected 56 patients in whom a GC withdrawal was attempted. 98 patients were in the prednisone maintenance group. The proportion of patients experiencing a flare was not significantly lower in the maintenance group than in the withdrawal group (p = 0.81). However, among the withdrawal group, the rate of flares was significantly higher in serologically active clinically quiescent (SACQ) patients (p < 0,0001). At Cox regression analysis, duration of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) therapy and ≥5 year remission at withdrawal were protective factors, while a SACQ disease and history of lupus nephritis increased the risk of disease flare.

CONCLUSION

GC withdrawal is an achievable target in SLE and may be attempted in patients in complete remission.However, it might underline a caution in patients with SACQ disease who may be at greater risk forflare when GCare discontinued. HCQ therapy and durable remission can significantly reduce the risk.

Treatment targets in SLE: remission and low disease activity state

Treat-to-target strategies have changed the approach to management of many chronic conditions, with improvements in patient outcomes. The key to success of treat to target is the availability of validated treatment endpoints, which have been difficult to derive for SLE, a condition notorious for its heterogeneity. This review will focus on the development and validation of the definitions of remission in SLE framework and the lupus low disease activity state. Lupus low disease activity state is more attainable than remission, with a stepwise concentric relationship between the target states indicating increasing stringency. Both lupus low disease activity state and definitions of remission in SLE remission have been proven to be associated with reduction in disease flares, reduced risk of accrual of irreversible end organ damage, and improvement in patient reported outcomes. These endpoints have therefore provided the key for the development of a treat-to-target approach in clinical practice in SLE and for the design of future clinical trials.

Prevalence, predictors and prognostic benefits of remission achievement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review and evaluate the prevalence, potential predictors and prognostic benefits of remission achievement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Studies reporting prevalence, predictors and prognostic benefits of remission in adult SLE patients were searched and selected from Pubmed and EMBASE databases. Studies were reviewed for relevance and quality. Two reviewers independently assessed studies and extracted data.

RESULTS

Data from forty-one studies including 17270 patients were included and analyzed. Although no consensus has been achieved on the definition of remission, clinical disease activity, serological activity, duration and treatment are agreed to be critical components of defining remission status. In most studies published in the recent 5 years, 42.4% to 88% patients achieved and maintained the remission status for one year, and 21.1% to 70% for at least 5 years. Factors associated with remission included older age at diagnosis, lower baseline disease activity and absence of major organ involvement, while positive serological results were shown to be negatively associated with remission. Remission-especially prolonged remission-when achieved, demonstrated an association with lower accrual of damage and better quality of life among patients with SLE.

CONCLUSIONS

Remission is an achievable and desirable target for SLE patients, proven to be associated with prognostic benefits. Further development and assessment of a clear remission definition, a risk stratification model as well as a full algorithm with frequency of monitoring, timepoints for treatment adjustment and drug withdrawal are required.

Cardiovascular risk stratification and appropriate use of statins in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus according to different strategies

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Cardiovascular risk management of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is medically relevant. The objectives were to estimate the cardiovascular risk by different strategies in patients with SLE, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy, and identify how many patients with statin indication received such drugs.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was performed from a secondary database. Following the recommendations of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines and the Argentine Consensus, the QRISK-3 and the adjusted Framingham (multiplying factor × 2) scores were calculated in primary prevention subjects. The indications for statin therapy according to these recommendations were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 110 patients were included. Regarding patients without previous cardiovascular history, the median adjusted Framingham score was 12.8% (4.1-21.9), and 45.2%, 22.6%, and 32.2% of them were classified at low, moderate, or high risk. The median QRISK-3 score was 6.0% (2.1-14.1) and 42.1% of subjects were classified "at risk". Only 60% of subjects in secondary prevention received statins, although no patient received the recommended doses. Analyzing patients in primary prevention who did not receive statins (87%), 43.4% and 45.2% of the patients were eligible for statin therapy according to NICE guidelines and Argentine Consensus, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that a large proportion of patients with SLE have a considerable cardiovascular risk and many of them would be eligible for statin therapy. However, the statin use observed was low.Key Points• A large proportion of patients with lupus have a considerable cardiovascular risk, explained in part by dyslipidemia.• Many patients with SLE would be eligible for statin therapy according to risk stratification based on conventional risk factors.• The use of statins in this population is inadequate.

The association between duration of remission, fatigue, depression and health-related quality of life in Italian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of duration of remission on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

We conducted a 5-year retrospective study on two Italian cohorts. Remission was defined as a continuative period of no clinical disease activity, according to the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2 K, and a permitted maximum prednisone dose of 5 mg/day. HRQoL was measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF36) during the last visit.

RESULTS

We enrolled 136 female SLE patients. During observation, 15 (11%) patients had been in remission for ≥1 and <2 years, 15 (11%) for ≥2 and <3 years, 19 (14%) for ≥3 and <4 years, 9 (7%) for ≥4 and <5 years, and 53 (39%) had been in prolonged remission for ≥5 years. In the multivariate model, considering depression and fatigue as covariates, patients in prolonged remission showed significantly better scores in the physical functioning (p = 0.039), role physical (p = 0.029), bodily pain (p = 0.0057), general health (p = 0.0033) and social functioning (p = 0.0085) components of the SF36, compared with those in remission <5 years or unremitted. Subsequent mediation analyses found that these effects were partly influenced by depression.

CONCLUSION

Lupus remission could improve the HRQoL of SLE patients, particularly when associated with appropriate management of depression and fatigue.

Prevalence and predictors of flare after immunosuppressant discontinuation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in remission

Objectives

Patients with SLE are often exposed to prolonged immunosuppression since few data on flare recurrence in remitted patients who discontinued immunosuppressants are available. We aimed to assess the rate and predictors of flare after immunosuppressant withdrawal in SLE patients in remission.

Methods

SLE patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2018 (according to the ACR criteria), ever treated with immunosuppressants and currently in follow-up were considered. Immunosuppressant discontinuation was defined as complete withdrawal of any immunosuppressive drug. Reasons for discontinuation were remission, defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K = 0 on a stable immunosuppressive and/or antimalarial therapy and/or on prednisone ⩽5 mg/day, or poor adherence/intolerance. Flares were defined according to the SLEDAI Flare Index. Predictors of a subsequent flare were analysed by multivariate logistic regression.

Results

There were 319 eligible patients out of 456 (69.9%). Of the 319 patients, 139 (43.5%) discontinued immunosuppressants, 105 (75.5%) due to remission, 34 (24.5%) due to poor adherence/intolerance. The mean (s.d.) follow-up time after immunosuppressant withdrawal was 91 (71) months (range 6–372). Among the patients who discontinued immunosuppressants, 26/105 remitted (24.7%) and 23/34 unremitted patients (67.6%) experienced a flare (P &lt; 0.001) after a median (range) follow-up of 57 (6–264) and 8 months (1–72), respectively (P = 0.009). In patients who discontinued immunosuppressants due to remission, maintenance therapy with antimalarials (OR 0.243, 95% CI 0.070, 0.842) and the duration of remission at immunosuppressant discontinuation (OR 0.870, 0.824–0.996) were independent protective factors against disease flare.

Conclusion

SLE flares are not uncommon after immunosuppressant discontinuation, even in remitted patients; however, antimalarial therapy and durable remission can significantly reduce the risk of flare.

Performance of SLE responder index and lupus low disease activity state in real life: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively assess the performance of the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) responder index (SRI) and the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) in a cohort-based, "real-life" clinical setting.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-one consecutive patients with SLE were subdivided into two groups based on the need or not to escalate their immune suppressive treatment. Clinimetrics including physician global assessment scale (PGA), SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement index (ECLAM) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group index (BILAG) 2004 version were measured at baseline and at 6 and 12 months, together with laboratory data and treatment changes. LLDAS and SRI were calculated at each time point.

RESULTS

Lupus low disease activity state but not SRI-4 correlated with treatment de-escalation. Low disease activity attainment as estimated by LLDAS was more frequent in patients starting with lower SLEDAI-2K, whereas a decrease in SLEDAI score ≥ 4 points with < 0.3 increased PGA and no new grade A or more than one new grade B BILAG domains (SRI-4) was more frequent in patients with higher SLEDAI-2K and/or severe renal activity at baseline. Anti-DNA-positive patients were less likely to be in LLDAS at any time point. Serositis was associated with lack of LLDAS at baseline, but did not affect LLDAS achievement at 12 months. Normalizing complement levels heralded the achievement of LLDAS and SRI-4.

CONCLUSION

Lupus low disease activity state is a valuable tool for assessing response to treatment in the daily rheumatology practice. SRI might be less informative, at least in patients with low basal SLEDAI.

A Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Events in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective: To identify accurate occurrence and risk of cardiovascular (CV) events (stroke and myocardial infarction [MI]) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Systemic literature search in PubMed and additional manual search were performed to obtain interested studies until March 31, 2018. The pooled incidences and risk of stroke and MI were calculated. Results: A total of 24 studies were included in this meta-analysis. For MI, a total of 1,516 SLE patients were reported to had MI (n = 96,154) over a mean follow-up of 9.98 years: incidence 2.0% (95% CI: 1.7-2.4%), i.e. 0.20/100 pyrs; in the five studies, 360 SLE patients (n = 18,943) and 817 controls had MI (n = 111,525), revealing that the risk of MI in SLE population was 3.04 times higher than in the general population (RR = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.81-5.11). For stroke, the incidence of 17 studies during the 10.09 follow-up period using random model was 4.4% (95% CI: 3.6-5.1%), i.e. 0.44/100 pyrs; in the 7 studies, 694 SLE patients (n = 22,594) and 4,034 controls had stroke (n = 255,023), indicating that the risk of MI in SLE population was 1.95 times higher than that in the general population (RR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.52-2.53). Conclusion: Based on the findings from previous reports, our meta-analysis showed that patients with SLE have been at higher risk of CV events.