Tuberculosis despite latent infection screening and treatment in patients receiving TNF inhibitor therapy

The efficacy of Bloso fish (Glossogobius giuris sp.) in improving hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet, and albumin levels of Wistar rats with hypoalbuminemia

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease worldwide that causes death. Common clinical manifestations of patients with TB include anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and malnutrition. Most patients with TB are infected with coccus bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, that commonly attack the respiratory tract. However, the consumption of heme protein sources could improve the nutritional status of patients with TB. Fish comprise one of the most widely consumed sources of heme. The bloso fish (Glossogobius giuris sp.), considered a fish without economic value is a new alternative source of heme protein. This study aimed to develop supplements using bloso fish (Glossogobius giuris sp.). This study used an experimental pretest-post-test control group design. Seven male Wistar rats were used as the negative control group. Twenty- eight male Wistar rats were administered S. aureus, fed a protein-deficient diet, and divided into the positive control group, the K1 group, which received up to 675 mg/200 g of bloso fish flour, the K2 group, which received up to 67.5 mg/200 g of bloso fish oil, and the K3 group, which received up to 675 mg/200 g of bloso fish fluor from oil extraction dregs. Treatment was administered for 28 days. The hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Ht), platelet, and albumin levels in blood serum from the retroorbital vein were measured. Data were processed using a paired t-test and one-way analysis of variance. The results showed differences in Hb, Ht, platelet, and albumin levels were observed before and after treatment. Additionally, differences in Hb, Ht, platelet, and albumin levels were observed in the groups that received bloso fish flour and bloso fish oil. Bloso fish flour and bloso fish oil increased the Hb, Ht, platelet, and albumin levels of rats with hypoalbuminemia.

Regional risk of tuberculosis and viral hepatitis with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor treatment: A systematic review

Background: TNFα inhibitors are regularly used to treat autoimmune diseases. Tuberculosis (TB) and viral hepatitis B are considered potential infectious complications, and screening and surveillance are therefore recommended. Current guidelines do not take into account regional differences in endemicity of these infections. Methods: A systematic literature review of TB and viral hepatitis in patients receiving TNFα-inhibitors was performed, searching in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. Studies were selected against predefined eligibility criteria and assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The number of TB and viral hepatitis cases/1,000 TNFα-inhibitor patients were evaluated, and regional variation compared. Results: 105 observational studies involving over 140,000 patients were included. Overall, 1% of patients developed TB or viral hepatitis B. TB cases/1,000 TNFα-inhibitor patients were 4-fold higher in Asia, Africa, and South America than in Europe, North America, and Australasia where only 0%-0.4% of patients developed TB. Hepatitis B cases/1,000 patients were over 15-fold higher in countries with high prevalence (China, Taiwan, South Korea, Thailand) compared with low prevalence (p < 0.00001) where only 0.4% of patients developed hepatitis B. Only three of 143 patients developed viral hepatitis C, and there was insufficient data to allow regional sub-analysis. Conclusion: TB and viral hepatitis B infections in patients treated with TNFα inhibitors are largely confined to countries with high prevalence of these infections. As only 1/2,500 patients in low prevalence countries treated with TNFα inhibitors develop TB or viral hepatitis B, we suggest an individualized, risk-based approach, rather than universal screening for all patients.

Increased susceptibility to pneumonia due to tumour necrosis factor inhibition and prospective immune system rescue via immunotherapy

Immunomodulators such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are used to treat autoimmune conditions by reducing the magnitude of the innate immune response. Dampened innate responses pose an increased risk of new infections by opportunistic pathogens and reactivation of pre-existing latent infections. The alteration in immune response predisposes to increased severity of infections. TNF inhibitors are used to treat autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, transplant recipients, and inflammatory bowel disease. The efficacies of immunomodulators are shown to be varied, even among those that target the same pathways. Monoclonal antibody-based TNF inhibitors have been shown to induce stronger immunosuppression when compared to their receptor-based counterparts. The variability in activity also translates to differences in risk for infection, moreover, parallel, or sequential use of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids makes it difficult to accurately attribute the risk of infection to a single immunomodulatory drug. Among recipients of TNF inhibitors, Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been shown to be responsible for 12.5-59% of all infections; Pneumocystis jirovecii has been responsible for 20% of all non-viral infections; and Legionella pneumophila infections occur at 13-21 times the rate of the general population. This review will outline the mechanism of immune modulation caused by TNF inhibitors and how they predispose to infection with a focus on Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Legionella pneumophila, and Pneumocystis jirovecii. This review will then explore and evaluate how other immunomodulators and host-directed treatments influence these infections and the severity of the resulting infection to mitigate or treat TNF inhibitor-associated infections alongside antibiotics.

Risk of tuberculosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological and targeted drugs: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Concerns exist regarding the potential development of tuberculosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with biological and targeted drugs. We assessed systematically whether biological therapy increased the risk of tuberculosis in patients with RA by meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and China Biology Medicine disc for RCTs evaluating biological therapy in patients with RA from inception through August 2021. Traditional meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed to compare the risk of tuberculosis for each biologics class in patients with RA. Peto odds ratio (Peto OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated as the primary effect measure.

RESULTS

In total, 39 studies with 20,354 patients were included in this meta-analysis, and 82 patients developed tuberculosis. The risk of tuberculosis was increased in patients treated with biologics compared with non-biologics (Peto OR: 3.86, 95% CI: 2.36-6.32, P < 0.001). Also, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors had a higher probability of developing tuberculosis than placebo (Peto OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 2.30-6.88, P < 0.001). However, network meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the risk of tuberculosis for each biologics class in patients with RA. Noticeably, tuberculosis was significantly more common in patients treated with a high dose compared with patients receiving a low dose of tofacitinib (Peto OR: 7.39, 95% CI: 2.00-27.31, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates the evidence of an elevated risk of tuberculosis in patients with RA treated with TNF-α inhibitors, and a dose-dependent elevated risk of tuberculosis in patients treated with tofacitinib.

Secondary immunodeficiencies: An overview

OBJECTIVE

To review the different causes of secondary immunodeficiencies and provide clinicians with an updated overview of potential factors that contribute to immunodeficiency.

DATA SOURCES

Recent published literature obtained through PubMed database searches, including research articles, review articles, and case reports.

STUDY SELECTIONS

PubMed database searches were conducted using the following keywords: immunodeficiency, antibody deficiency, immunosuppressive drugs, genetic syndrome, malignancy, HIV infection, viral infection, secondary immunodeficiency, nutrition, prematurity, aging, protein-losing enteropathy, nephropathy, trauma, space travel, high altitude, and ultraviolet light. Studies published in the last decade and relevant to the pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical characteristics of secondary immunodeficiencies were selected and reviewed.

RESULTS

Researchers continue to investigate and report abnormal immune parameters in the different entities collectively known as secondary immunodeficiencies. Immunodeficiency might occur as a consequence of malnutrition, metabolic disorders, use of immunosuppressive medications, chronic infections, malignancies, severe injuries, and exposure to adverse environmental conditions. The neonate and the elderly may have decreased immune responses relative to healthy adults. Each of these conditions may present with different immune defects of variable severity. The acquired immunodeficiency syndrome results from infections by the human immunodeficiency virus, which targets CD4 T cells leading to defective immune responses. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 B cells, and its use might result in persistent hypogammaglobulinemia.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should consider secondary immunodeficiencies in the differential diagnosis of a patient with recurrent infections and abnormal immunologic evaluation. The use of biological agents for the treatment of inflammatory conditions and malignancies is an increasingly important cause of secondary immunodeficiency.