In vitro activity of cefiderocol against ceftazidime-avibactam susceptible and resistant KPC-producing Enterobacterales: cross-resistance and synergistic effects

Acquired blaCfxA-3 carried by a conjugative transposon or duplicated intrinsic blaCME-3 mediates cefiderocol resistance in Elizabethkingia anophelis clinical isolates

OBJECTIVES

Elizabethkingia spp. are resistant to multiple antibiotics. This study aimed to determine in vitro and in vivo activities of cefiderocol against Elizabethkingia spp. and to investigate resistance mechanisms.

METHODS

Bloodstream isolates were collected from four hospitals. In vitro and in vivo activities were determined using broth microdilution and the wax moth model, respectively. Genome comparison and gene editing were used to confirm the contribution of target genes. Conjugation experiments and serial passage were used to determine transferability and stability, respectively. A MIC of ≤ 4 mg/L was designated as the susceptibility breakpoint.

RESULTS

Among 228 non-duplicated isolates, 226 exhibited a MIC of ≤ 4 mg/L with MIC50/90 of 1/2 mg/L. Two isolates had a MIC of 128 mg/L; both source patients had multiple comorbidities, were ventilator-dependent, and had not received cefiderocol previously. Resistance was attributable to acquisition of blaCfxA-3, carried by a conjugative transposon from Prevotella jejuni, and duplication of intrinsic blaCME-3, which led to its overexpression. tetQ coexisted with blaCfxA-3 in this conjugative transposon and minocycline facilitated its transfer among E. anophelis. Antibiotics prescribed for source patients did not induce blaCME-3 duplication. The stabilities of blaCfxA-3 and double blaCME-3 were 100% and > 90%, respectively, after 10-day serial passage. Cefiderocol failed to rescue moth larvae infected with resistant strains, but removal of resistance mechanisms restored in vivo efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol was in vitro and in vivo active against Elizabethkingia spp. but resistance may emerge due to the availability, transferability, and/or stability of resistance mechanisms.

Evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance driven by mutations in double-copy blaKPC-2 to blaKPC-189 during treatment of ST11 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants can contribute to resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP). However, two-copy KPC variant-mediated resistance to CZA has rarely been reported to date. Here, we aimed to clarify the evolutionary trajectory of CZA resistance driven by mutations in double-copy blaKPC-2 to blaKPC-189 carried by the tandem core structure (ISKpn6-blaKPC-ISKpn27-tnpR-IS26) during treatment of ST11 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP). The CZA-resistant KP strain carried double-copy blaKPC-189, a variant with alanine-threonine and aspartate-tyrosine substitutions at Ambler amino acid positions 172 (A172T) and 179 (D179Y) of blaKPC-2. Clone experiments confirmed that, compared with that of the wild-type blaKPC-2 clone strain, the minimum inhibitory concentration of CZA increased 16-fold in the blaKPC-189-mutant strain. Furthermore, protein structure analysis revealed the A172T and D179Y mutations of blaKPC-189 can have a direct effect on the binding affinity of CAZ and AVI for KPC. Sequence comparison revealed that blaKPC-189 was mutated in a double-copy format upon CZA exposure, which was carried by the IS26-mediated tandem core structure ISKpn27-blaKPC-ISKpn6. This tandem core structure apparently evolves in vivo during infection, although not by self-transferring, and multiple ISKpn27-blaKPC-ISKpn6 copy numbers could mediate transferable CZA resistance upon mobilization. In addition, compared with the wild-type blaKPC-2 gene, the blaKPC-189 gene had no fitness cost. In summary, our study highlighted the emergence of CZA-resistant blaKPC-189 variants in the ST11 clone and the presence of a double-copy blaKPC-189 in the IncFII-type plasmid, which is carried by a tandem core structure (IS26-ISKpn6-blaKPC-189-ISKpn27-tnpR-IS26).

IMPORTANCE

To date, ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) resistance caused by double-copy Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants has not been elucidated. The multicopy forms of carbapenem resistance genes carried by the same plasmid are relatively rare in most carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. In this study, we elucidate the evolutionary trajectory of CZA resistance in ST11 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae harboring a double-copy blaKPC and provide new insights into the mechanisms of acquired resistance to CZA.

In vivo development of resistance to novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: a case series

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the dynamics that may characterize the emergence of KPC variants with resistance to novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL/βLICs) represents a challenge to be overcome in the appropriate use of recently introduced antibiotics.

METHODS

Retrospective case series describing development of multiple resistance to novel βL/βLICs in patients with KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections treated with these drugs. Clinical-microbiological investigation and characterization of longitudinal strains by Whole-Genome Sequencing were performed.

RESULTS

Four patients with KPC-Kp bloodstream infections were included. Most frequent clinical features were kidney disease, obesity, cardiac surgery as reason for admission, ICU stay, treatment with ceftazidime/avibactam, and pneumonia and/or acute kidney injury needing renal replacement therapy as KPC-Kp sepsis-associated complications. The development of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed in four longitudinal strains (three of which were co-resistant to aztreonam/avibactam and cefiderocol) following treatments with ceftazidime/avibactam (n = 3) or cefiderocol (n = 1). Resistance to meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was observed in one case after exposure to ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam. Resistome analysis showed that resistance to novel βL/βLICs was related to specific mutations within blaKPC carbapenemase gene (D179Y mutation [KPC-33]; deletion Δ242-GT-243 [KPC-14]) in three longitudinal strains, while porin loss (truncated OmpK35 and OmpK36 porins) was observed in one case.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with novel βL/βLICs or cefiderocol may lead to the selection of resistant mutants in the presence of factors influencing the achievement of PK/PD targets. KPC variants are mainly associated with resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, and some of them (e.g. KPC-14) may also be associated with reduced susceptibility to aztreonam/avibactam and/or cefiderocol. Loss of function of the OmpK35 and OmpK36 porins appears to play a role in the development of resistance to meropenem/vaborbactam and/or imipenem/relebactam, but other mechanisms may also be involved.

In vivo emergence of cefiderocol and ceftazidime/avibactam cross-resistance in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae following ceftazidime/avibactam -based therapies

We described the emergence of ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol cross-resistance in patients with KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. All strains with ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol cross-resistance showed point mutations on KPC Ω-loop. Taken together, our results indicate that prolonged exposure to ceftazidime/avibactam can confer cross-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol.

Complete Genome Sequence of a Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain Carrying Novel Variant blaKPC-203, Cross-Resistant to Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Cefiderocol, but Susceptible to Carbapenems, Isolated in Italy, 2023

BACKGROUND

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a concerning pathogen, responsible for hospital-associated outbreaks. Multi drug resistant (MDR) strains are especially hard to treat. We conducted whole-genome sequencing on a MDR K. pneumoniae strain in order to identify genomic features potentially linked to its phenotype.

METHODS

DNA sequencing was performed on the Illumina iSeq 100 platform. Genome assembly was carried out with SPAdes. The genome was annotated with RASTtk. Typing was performed with MLST and Kaptive. Antibiotic resistance genes were detected with AMRFinderPlus and Abricate, and further verified with BLAST.

RESULTS

The strain exhibited resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol, but remained susceptible to carbapenems. The strain belonged to sequence type ST101, serotype O1:K17. The analysis of antibiotic resistance genes indicated that the strain carried a novel KPC variant, designated as KPC-203, featuring a EL deletion at amino acid position 166-167, within the Ω-loop, and a nine-amino-acid insertion (LAVYTRAPM) at position 259. Sequence alterations were found in porin genes ompK35 and ompK36. Unlike molecular testing, which was able to detect the KPC-203 variant, all phenotypic carbapenemase detection methods achieved negative results.

CONCLUSIONS

KPC-203, a novel KPC variant, showed a sequence modification in a cephalosporin resistance-associated hotspot. Interestingly, such alterations typically correlate with the restoration of carbapenem susceptibility. We hypothesize that KPC-203 likely led to resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol, while maintaining susceptibility to carbapenems.

Effect of ceftazidime-avibactam combined with different antimicrobials against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

This study aimed to assess the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in combination with various antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). We selected 59 clinical CRKP isolates containing distinct drug resistance mechanisms. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of meropenem (MEM), colistin (COL), eravacycline (ERA), amikacin (AK), fosfomycin (FOS), and aztreonam (ATM), both individually and in combination with CZA, were tested using the checkerboard method. The interactions of antimicrobial agent combinations were assessed by fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI). The time-kill curve assay was employed to dynamically evaluate the effects of these drugs alone and in combination format. In the checkerboard assay, the combination of CZA+MEM showed the highest level of synergistic effect against both KPC-producing and carbapenemase-non-producing isolates, with synergy rates of 91.3% and 100%, respectively. Following closely was the combination of FOS+CZA . For metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) producing strains, ATM+CZA displayed complete synergy, while the combination of MEM+CZA showed a synergy rate of only 57.14% for NDM-producing strains and 91.67% for IMP-producing strains. In the time-kill assay, MEM+CZA also demonstrated significant synergistic effects against the two KPC-2-producing isolates (Y070 and L70), the two carbapenemase-non-producing isolates (Y083 and L093), and the NDM-1-producing strain L13, with reductions in log10 CFU/mL exceeding 10 compared to the control. Against the IMP-producing strain Y047, ATM+CZA exhibited the highest synergistic effect, resulting in a log10 CFU/mL reduction of 10.43 compared to the control. The combination of CZA and MEM exhibited good synergistic effects against KPC-producing and non-enzyme-producing strains, followed by the FOS+CZA combination. Among MBL-producing strains, ATM+CZA demonstrated the most pronounced synergistic effect. However, the combinations of CZA with ERA, AK, and COL show irrelevant effects against the tested clinical isolates.

IMPORTANCE

Our study confirmed the efficacy of the combination CZA+MEM against KPC-producing and non-carbapenemase-producing strains. For metalloenzyme-producing strains, CZA+ATM demonstrated the most significant synergy. Additionally, CZA exhibited a notable synergy effect when combined with FOS. These combination therapies present promising new options for the treatment of CRKP infection.

Evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol resistance in ST131-H30R1-Escherichia coli isolates with KPC-3 mutants and application of FTIR biotyping

Ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol represent two of the few alternatives for infections by KPC-producing Enterobacterales. We reported the emergence of resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in a KPC-producing ST131-Escherichia coli (KPC-ST131-Ec) clinical isolate. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, whole-genome sequencing, and cloning experiments were performed. A KPC-49-Ec isolate resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L) and susceptible to cefiderocol (MICFDC: 2 mg/L) was recovered in a blood sample from an oncologic patient hospitalized in the medical ICU (June 2019) during ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. After 44 days, a KPC-31-Ec resistant to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L, MICFDC: 8 mg/L) was found in a rectal sample during a second cycle of ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. Both KPC-49 (R163S) and KPC-31 (D179Y) were detected in the epidemic ST131-H30R1-Ec high-risk clone and showed a phenotype resembling that of ESBL producers. FTIR spectroscopy managed to differentiate cefiderocol-susceptible and resistant ST131-Ec isolates, and these from others belonging to different clones. After cloning and transformation experiments, KPC-49 and KPC-31 were responsible for ceftazidime-avibactam resistance (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L) and decreased carbapenem MICs (MICMER ≤ 0.12 mg/L, MICIMI ≤ 1 mg/L). KPC-31 was also shown to be associated with increased MICs of cefiderocol (twofold and threefold dilutions over KPC-3 and KPC-49, respectively). However, mutations in proteins participating in outer membrane stability and integrity, such as TolR, could have a more relevant role in cefiderocol resistance. The effects of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol co-resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales producing KPC mutants make their identification challenging for clinical laboratories.IMPORTANCEThroughout four admissions in our hospital of a single patient, different KPC-3 variants (KPC-3, KPC-49, and KPC-31) were found in surveillance and clinical ST131-Escherichia coli isolates, after prolonged therapies with meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam. Different patterns of resistance to cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam emerged, accompanied by restored carbapenem susceptibility. The inability to detect these variants with some phenotypic methods, especially KPC-31 by immunochromatography, and the expression of a phenotype similar to that of ESBL producers, posed challenge to identify these variants in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Molecular methods and whole-genome sequencing are necessary and new techniques able to cluster or differentiate related isolates could also be helpful; this is the case of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, which managed in our study to discriminate isolates by cefiderocol susceptibility within ST131, and those from the non-ST131 ones.

Reduce susceptibility to cefiderocol in gram negative bacteria in children: Is hope already lost before it's even arrived?

BACKGROUND

In last years the diffusion of carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) is increasing worldwide, mainly due to the expression of carbapenemases. Cefiderocol has molecular characteristics that ideally confers activity against all CR-GNB, but resistant strains have already been identified. We describe cefiderocol susceptibility profile among multi-drug resistant Gram-negative isolated from pediatric patients.

METHODS

Prospective, single pediatric center study, 1st January 2020-15th June 2023. All GNB carbapenemases producers or phenotypically carbapenem-resistant isolated in the study period were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility. Clinical and microbiological data were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed, comparing the groups of cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB).

RESULTS

Forty-seven GNB were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility; 38% were cefiderocol-resistant: 16/30 (52%) among Enterobacterales and 2/17 (12%) among NF-GNB. None of the patients were previously exposed to cefiderocol. Looking at Enterobacterales, resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was higher among cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible strains (62% vs 36%, respectively), as MBL expression (67% vs. 36%, respectively). Too few NF-GNB were cefiderocol-resistance to draw any conclusion. No difference in ICU admission and mortality was identified comparing cefiderocol-resistant vs. susceptible strains. Patients colonized/infected by cefiderocol-resistant strains had been previously hospitalized more frequently.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort cefiderocol resistance was mostly registered among Enterobacterales, and especially among MBL producers' strains (that were alongside resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam). This could be explained by the known possible cross resistance mechanism among ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol. Also, correlation of cefiderocol-resistance with previous hospitalization could be associated with horizontal resistance transmission. Looking at our data, we believe that cefiderocol should be use cautiously, especially empirically and in monotherapy, due to the high resistance rate.

The mechanism of ceftazidime and cefiderocol hydrolysis by D179Y variants of KPC carbapenemases is similar and involves the formation of a long-lived covalent intermediate

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants have been described that confer resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol. Of these, KPC-33 and KPC-31 are D179Y-containing variants derived from KPC-2 and KPC-3, respectively. To better understand this atypical phenotype, the catalytic mechanism of ceftazidime and cefiderocol hydrolysis by KPC-33 and KPC-31 as well as the ancestral KPC-2 and KPC-3 enzymes was studied. Steady-state kinetics showed that the D179Y substitution in either KPC-2 or KPC-3 is associated with a large decrease in both kcat and KM such that kcat/KM values were largely unchanged for both ceftazidime and cefiderocol substrates. A decrease in both kcat and KM is consistent with a decreased and rate-limiting deacylation step. We explored this hypothesis by performing pre-steady-state kinetics and showed that the acylation step is rate-limiting for KPC-2 and KPC-3 for both ceftazidime and cefiderocol hydrolysis. In contrast, we observed a burst of acyl-enzyme formation followed by a slow steady-state rate for the D179Y variants of KPC-2 and KPC-3 with either ceftazidime or cefiderocol, indicating that deacylation of the covalent intermediate is the rate-limiting step for catalysis. Finally, we show that the low KM value for ceftazidime or cefiderocol hydrolysis of the D179Y variants is not an indication of tight binding affinity for the substrates but rather is a reflection of the deacylation reaction becoming rate-limiting. Thus, the hydrolysis mechanism of ceftazidime and cefiderocol by the D179Y variants is very similar and involves the formation of a long-lived covalent intermediate that is associated with resistance to the drugs.

Deciphering mechanisms affecting cefepime-taniborbactam in vitro activity in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp. isolates recovered during a surveillance study in Spain

PURPOSE

To characterize the resistance mechanisms affecting the cefepime-taniborbactam combination in a collection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp. (predominantly P. aeruginosa; CRPA) clinical isolates.

METHODS

CPE (n = 247) and CRPA (n = 170) isolates were prospectively collected from patients admitted to 8 Spanish hospitals. Susceptibility to cefepime-taniborbactam and comparators was determined by broth microdilution. Cefepime-taniborbactam was the most active agent, inhibiting 97.6% of CPE and 67.1% of CRPA (MICs ≤ 8/4 mg/L). All isolates with cefepime-taniborbactam MIC > 8/4 mg/L (5 CPE and 52 CRPA) and a subset with MIC ≤ 8/4 mg/L (23 CPE and 24 CRPA) were characterized by whole genome sequencing.

RESULTS

A reduced cefepime-taniborbactam activity was found in two KPC-ST307-Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates with altered porins [KPC-62-K. pneumoniae (OmpA, OmpR/EnvZ), KPC-150-K. pneumoniae (OmpK35, OmpK36)] and one each ST133-VIM-1-Enterobacter hormaechei with altered OmpD, OmpR, and OmpC; IMP-8-ST24-Enterobacter asburiae; and NDM-5-Escherichia coli with an YRIN-inserted PBP3 and a mutated PBP2. Among the P. aeruginosa (68/76), elevated cefepime-taniborbactam MICs were mostly associated with GES-5-ST235, OXA-2+VIM-2-ST235, and OXA-2+VIM-20-ST175 isolates also carrying mutations in PBP3, efflux pump (mexR, mexZ) and AmpC (mpl) regulators, and non-carbapenemase-ST175 isolates with AmpD-T139M and PBP3-R504C mutations. Overall, accumulation of these mutations was frequently detected among non-carbapenemase producers.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduced cefepime-taniborbactam activity among the minority of isolates with elevated cefepime-taniborbactam MICs is not only due to IMP carbapenemases but also to the accumulation of multiple resistance mechanisms, including PBP and porin mutations in CPE and chromosomal mutations leading to efflux pumps up-regulation, AmpC overexpression, and PBP modifications in P. aeruginosa.

Prevalence and mortality of ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections (2018-2022)

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is a topic of great interest for epidemiological, diagnostic, and therapeutical reasons. However, data on its prevalence and burden on mortality in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) are lacking. This study was aimed at identifying risk factors for mortality in patients suffering from ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI.

METHODS

An observational retrospective study (January 2018-December 2022) was conducted at a tertiary hospital including all consecutive hospitalized adult patients with a ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI. Data on baseline clinical features, management, and admission outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Over the study period, among all the KPC-Kp BSI events recorded, 38 (10.5%) were caused by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp strains, 37 events being finally included. The ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp strains revealed susceptibility restoration to at least one carbapenem in more than 60% of cases. In-hospital and 30-day all-cause mortality rates were 22% and 16.2%, respectively. Non-survivors suffered from more baseline comorbidities and experienced a more severe ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI presentation (i.e., both the Pitt Bacteremia and INCREMENT-CPE scores were significantly higher). Presenting with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, chronic kidney disease-KDIGO stage 3A or worse-having recently gone through renal replacement therapy, having suffered from an acute kidney injury following the ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI, and being admitted for cardiac surgery were the strongest predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in KPC-Kp BSI easily emerged in our highly KPC-Kp endemic area with remarkable mortality rates. Our findings might provide physicians possibly actionable information when managing patients with a ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against comparators (ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftazidime-avibactam/ aztreonam combination, and colistin) against clinical isolates of meropenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from India

Cefiderocol (FDC), a novel siderophore drug, is active against Gram-negative bacteria producing carbapenemases, including metallo-beta-lactamases. The objective of this study is to compare the in vitro activity of FDC with ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), CZA/aztreonam (AT) combination, and colistin (CST), in clinical isolates of meropenem-resistant (MER-R) Klebsiella pneumoniae. From the 2,052 clinical specimens submitted for culture testing, 245 K. pneumoniae isolates were recovered within a 6-month period in 2021. One hundred three non-duplicate, non-outbreak, MER-R (minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC >4 µg/mL) strains were included in the study. Identification and susceptibility were performed using VITEK-2 (bioMérieux). Meropenem-susceptible isolates (n = 10) served as controls. For FDC, broth microdilution (BMD) was performed after in-house standardization. Disk diffusion (Liofilchem, Italy) and broth microdilution (ComASP, STC, Liofilchem, Italy) were used for susceptibility testing of CZA and CST, respectively. Synergy testing for CZA and AT was performed using disk approximation method. CLSI breakpoints were used for the interpretation of the results. For FDC, MIC50 and MIC90 were 2 and 8 µg/mL, respectively. A total of 80% of isolates were susceptible to FDC, 26.2% of isolates were susceptible to CZA, synergy testing with CZA/AT was positive for 74 (72%) of the isolates, and 89.3% were intermediate to CST. Nine (8.7%) were susceptible only to FDC. FDC is active in vitro against MER-R K. pneumoniae >CZA/AT > CZA > CST, as observed in this study, applying CLSI criteria. Clinico-microbiological studies should be performed to assess the clinical efficacy of this novel drug in this region with a high prevalence of carbapenem resistance among Gram-negative organisms. IMPORTANCE Management of infections with multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is a major challenge in hospital settings, with few treatment options. In this study, the authors aim to assess the in vitro susceptibility of these clinical isolates to cefiderocol, a novel siderophore. Comparators are colistin, ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam synergy, which are currently available options for treatment in this region. Baseline-resistance rates against cefiderocol are higher than those in the previously published studies, with MIC50 and MIC90 at 2 and 8 µg/mL, respectively.

The Effectiveness of Imipenem-Relebactam against Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistant Variants of the KPC-2 β-Lactamase

BACKGROUND

Ceftazidime-avibactam was approved by the FDA to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales carrying bla_KPC-2. However, variants of KPC-2 with amino acid substitutions at position 179 have emerged and confer resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam.

METHODS

The activity of imipenem-relebactam was assessed against a panel of 19 KPC-2 D179 variants. KPC-2 and the D179N and D179Y variants were purified for biochemical analyses. Molecular models were constructed with imipenem to assess differences in kinetic profiles.

RESULTS

All strains were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam, but resistant to ceftazidime (19/19) and ceftazidime-avibactam (18/19). KPC-2 and the D179N variant hydrolyzed imipenem, but the D179N variant's rate was much slower. The D179Y variant was unable to turnover imipenem. All three β-lactamases hydrolyzed ceftazidime at varying rates. The acylation rate of relebactam for the D179N variant was ~2.5× lower than KPC-2. Poor catalytic turnover by the D179Y variant precluded the determination of inhibitory kinetic parameters. Acyl-complexes with imipenem and ceftazidime were less prevalent with the D179N variant compared to the D179Y variant, supporting the kinetic observations that the D179Y variant was not as active as the D179N variant. Relebactam was slower to form an acyl-complex with the D179Y variant compared to avibactam. The D179Y model with imipenem revealed that the catalytic water molecule was shifted, and the carbonyl of imipenem was not within the oxyanion hole. Conversely in the D179N model, imipenem was oriented favorably for deacylation.

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem-relebactam overcame the resistance of the D179 variants, suggesting that this combination will be active against clinical isolates harboring these derivatives of KPC-2.

Activity of cefiderocol and synergy of novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor-based combinations against metallo-β-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli: insights from a two-year study (2019-2020)

This study was aimed at analyzing the prevalence of metallo-β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacilli (MBL-GNB) and evaluating both in vitro activity of cefiderocol and synergy of novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor-based combinations. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and meropenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa clinical strains were collected (2019-2020) and prevalence of MBL-producers investigated. Activity of cefiderocol was evaluated and synergistic effects of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam vs aztreonam plus ceftazidime/avibactam vs meropenem/vaborbactam plus aztreonam were compared. Among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, 87% (n = 307) produced KPC, 11.6% (n = 41) produced MBL, and 1.4% (n = 5) produced OXA-48-like. Among MBL-producing Enterobacterales, 78.1% (n = 32) and 21.9% (n = 9) were VIM- and NDM-producers, respectively. Among meropenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa, 1.9% (n = 8) produced VIM-type MBL. Cefiderocol resistance rate in VIM-producing Enterobacterales, VIM-producing P. aeruginosa, and NDM-producing Enterobacterales, was 6.2%, 12.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. Among MBL-producers tested, cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam showed a synergy rate of 20%, while for both aztreonam plus ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam plus aztreonam was 40%. Prevalence of MBL-producing Enterobacterales was remarkable. VIM-producing isolates were almost all susceptible to cefiderocol, while NDM-producers were often resistant. Meropenem/vaborbactam in combination with aztreonam showed similar synergistic activity to ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam but the addition of aztreonam reduced MICs below the resistance breakpoint only for meropenem/vaborbactam.

Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Klebsiella pneumoniae KPC-Producing Isolates: A Real-Life Observational Study

Background: Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) resistance amongst Enterobacterales is worryingly increasing worldwide. Objectives: The aim of this study was to collect and describe real-life data on CAZ-AVI-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) isolates in our University Hospital, with the ultimate goal of evaluating possible risk factors related to the acquisition of resistance. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study, including unique Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) isolates resistant to CAZ-AVI (CAZ-AVI-R) and producing only KPC, collected from July 2019 to August 2021 at Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. The pathogen's list was obtained from the microbiology laboratory; clinical charts of the corresponding patients were reviewed to collect demographic and clinical data. Subjects treated as outpatients or hospitalized for <48 h were excluded. Patients were then divided into two groups: S group, if they had a prior isolate of CAZ-AVI-susceptible KP-KPC, and R group, if the first documented isolate of KP-KPC was resistant to CAZ-AVI. Results: Forty-six unique isolates corresponding to 46 patients were included in the study. The majority of patients (60.9%) were hospitalized in an intensive care unit, 32.6% in internal medicine wards and 6.5% in surgical wards. A total of 15 (32.6%) isolates were collected from rectal swabs, representing a colonization. Amongst clinically relevant infections, pneumonia and urinary tract infections were the most commonly found (5/46, 10.9% each). Half of the patients received CAZ-AVI prior to isolation of the KP-KPC CAZ-AVI-R (23/46). This percentage was significantly higher in patients in the S group compared to patients in the R group (69.3% S group vs. 25% R group, p = 0.003). No differences between the two groups were documented in the use of renal replacement therapy or in the infection site. The clinically relevant CAZ-AVI-R KP infections (22/46, 47.8%) were all treated with a combination therapy, 65% including colistin and 55% including CAZ-AVI, with an overall clinical success of 38.1%. Conclusions: Prior use of CAZ-AVI was associated with the emergence of drug resistance.

Rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: impact on mortality and role of combination therapy

This study was aimed at investigating risk factors for mortality in patients suffering from KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating the impact of rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam use. This observational retrospective study (January 2017-May 2021) included all patients with a KPC-Kp BSI. Uni-multivariable analyses were carried out to evaluate the effect of clinical variables on both in-hospital death (IHD) and 30-day all-cause mortality, and the role of the combination of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin. One hundred and ninety-six patients met the study's inclusion criteria. Older age, having undergone renal replacement therapy during the 30 days preceding the KPC-Kp BSI onset, having an INCREMENT-CPE score ≥ 8, and having suffered from a superimposed and/or following KPC-Kp BSI treatment candidemia were found to be the main factors associated with both mortality rates. Among protective factors, the centrality of ceftazidime/avibactam in monotherapy (IHD: OR: 0.34; CI 95%: 0.11-1.00-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.18; CI 95%: 0.04-0.77) or combination (IHD: OR: 0.51; CI 95%: 0.22-1.19-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.62; CI 95%: 0.21-1.84) emerged and became even more evident once the effect of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin was removed. Rapid diagnostics may be useful to adopt more effective strategies for the treatment of KPC-Kp BSI patients and implement infection control measures, even if not associated with higher patient survival. Ceftazidime/avibactam, even when used alone, represents an important option against KPC-Kp, while combined use with polymyxin might not have altered its efficacy. Patient comorbidities, severity of BSI, and complications such as candidemia were confirmed to have a significant burden on survival.

Disc Diffusion and ComASP® Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine

Cefiderocol susceptibility testing represents a major challenge for clinical microbiology. Although disc diffusion showed robustness to test cefiderocol susceptibility, large areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) are reported by current EUCAST breakpoints. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol on a collection of 286 difficult-to-treat Gram-negative isolates using disc diffusion and ComASP^® cefiderocol microdilution panel. Broth microdilution (BMD) in iron-depleted Mueller-Hinton broth was used as reference method. Following the EUCAST guidelines, disc diffusion allowed to determine cefiderocol susceptibility (susceptible or resistant) in 78.6%, 88.1%, 85.4% and 100% of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia isolates tested, respectively. ComASP^® cefiderocol panel showed 94% and 84% of overall categorical agreement and essential agreement. Only one very major error and two major errors were observed, for MIC values nearly close to the resistance breakpoint (2 mg/L). Overall, 20.5% of the carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales that achieved ATU results by the disc diffusion method tested resistant by both ComASP^® panel and reference BMD. Conversely, all VIM-producing P. aeruginosa showed MIC values in the susceptible range (≤2 mg/L). Lastly, only six out of seven (85.7%) A. baumannii isolates showing inhibition zones <17 mm tested resistant by both ComASP^® panel and the reference BMD suggesting that inhibition zone <17 mm are not unequivocally suggestive of resistance. Our results, although obtained on a limited number of isolates, suggest that the combination of disc diffusion with a ComASP^® cefiderocol microdilution panel could be a viable solution to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in routine microbiology laboratories.

Cefiderocol, a Siderophore Cephalosporin, as a Treatment Option for Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) remain a significant public health threat, and, despite recent approvals, new antibiotics are needed. Severe infections caused by CRE, such as nosocomial pneumonia and bloodstream infections, are associated with a relatively high risk of morbidity and mortality. The recent approval of ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, plazomicin, eravacycline and cefiderocol has broadened the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with CRE infections. Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin with overall potent in vitro activity against CRE. It is taken up via iron transport channels through active transport, with some entry into bacteria through traditional porin channels. Cefiderocol is relatively stable against hydrolysis by most serine- and metallo-beta-lactamases, including KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP and OXA carbapenemases-the most frequent carbapenemases detected in CRE. The efficacy and safety of cefiderocol has been demonstrated in three randomised, prospective, parallel group or controlled clinical studies in patients at risk of being infected by multidrug-resistant or carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. This paper reviews the in vitro activity, emergence of resistance, preclinical effectiveness, and clinical experience for cefiderocol, and its role in the management of patients with CRE infections.

Synergistic Effect of Clinically Available Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors Combined with Cefiderocol against Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Organisms

The role of β-lactamases in reduced susceptibility or resistance to cefiderocol has been supported by recent reports. The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vitro impact of clinically available β-lactamase inhibitors on cefiderocol activity against characterized carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative isolates. A collection of 39 well-characterized Gram-negative isolates obtained from various clinical sources and countries were included. Cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated via reference broth microdilution. The chequerboard microdilution method and time-kill assays were used to determine the synergy of tazobactam, avibactam, vaborbactam and relebactam in combination with cefiderocol. MICs of cefiderocol presented a 4- to 256-fold reduction against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Gram-negative isolates (predominantly K. pneumoniae) when avibactam, vaborbactam and relebactam were combined individually. Notably, the KPC-inhibitors led to a 4- to 32-fold reduction in cefiderocol MICs in the four cefiderocol-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, showing restoration of cefiderocol susceptibility (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L) in ten out of twelve cases. Tazobactam led to a 4- to 64-fold decrease in cefiderocol MICs only in K. pneumoniae strains harbouring bla_KPC-41, bla_KPC-31, bla_KPC-53 and bla_KPC-66. The synergistic effect of all serine-β-lactamase inhibitors on cefiderocol activity was also shown in OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales strains. Conversely, a combination of β-lactamases inhibitors with cefiderocol was not synergistic with all OXA-23-like-producing strains and most metallo-β-lactamases producers. In conclusion, the addition of clinically available serine β-lactamase inhibitors to cefiderocol might represent an important development in the formulation to increase its spectrum and therapeutic efficacy, and to limit in vivo resistance emergence.

Rapid ResaCeftazidime-Avibactam Enterobacterales NP Test: Rapid Detection of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility in Enterobacterales

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, has good antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) producing class A and C and some class D carbapenemases, but in recent years, the emergence of CZA-resistant Enterobacterales bacteria is growing. Therefore, rapid, accurate, and timely detection of CZA is necessary for clinical anti-infection treatment. In this study, the rapid ResaCeftazidime-avibactam Enterobacterales NP test was developed; its principle is that metabolically active bacteria (CZA-resistant strains) can change resazurin-PrestoBlue, a viability colorant, from blue to purple or pink in the presence of CZA, whereas CZA-susceptible strains cannot. We used 178 Enterobacterales isolates to evaluate the performance of this test. This test allowed the susceptibility of Enterobacterales to CZA to be detected within 4.5 h with an overall performance of 96% category agreement (CA), 7% major errors (MEs), and 0% very major errors (VMEs). Performance for Escherichia coli included 100% CA and 0% MEs and VMEs. Performance for Klebsiella pneumoniae included 99% CA and 2% MEs and 0% VMEs. Performance for Enterobacter cloacae included 87% CA, 25% MEs, and 0% VMEs. Moreover, this test is both economical ($1.0106 per isolate) and convenient, as it only requires basic laboratory equipment. In a word, the rapid ResaCeftazidime-avibactam Enterobacterales NP test is rapid and feasible, which may provide certain backing for the rapid screening and timely treatment of CZA-resistant strains in the clinic.

Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase Variants Resistant to Ceftazidime-Avibactam: an Evolutionary Overview

First variants of the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), KPC-2 and KPC-3, have encountered a worldwide success, particularly in K. pneumoniae isolates. These beta-lactamases conferred resistance to most beta-lactams including carbapenems but remained susceptible to new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors, such as ceftazidime-avibactam. After the marketing of ceftazidime-avibactam, numerous variants of KPC resistant to this association have been described among isolates recovered from clinical samples or derived from experimental studies. In KPC variants resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam, point mutations, insertions and/or deletions have been described in various hot spots. Deciphering the impact of these mutations is crucial, not only from a therapeutic point of view, but also to follow the evolution in time and space of KPC variants resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. In this review, we describe the mutational landscape of the KPC beta-lactamase toward ceftazidime-avibactam resistance based on a multidisciplinary approach including epidemiology, microbiology, enzymology, and thermodynamics. We show that resistance is associated with three hot spots, with a high representation of insertions and deletions compared with other class A beta-lactamases. Moreover, extension of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam is associated with a trade-off in the resistance to other beta-lactams and a decrease in enzyme stability. Nevertheless, the high natural stability of KPC could underlay the propensity of this enzyme to acquire in vivo mutations conferring resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZavi), particularly via insertions and deletions.

Activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefiderocol and comparators against Gram-negative organisms causing bloodstream infections in Northern Italy (2019-2021): emergence of complex resistance phenotypes

Herein we assessed the frequency of Gram-negative organisms causing bloodstream infections and activity spectrum of ceftolozane-tazobactam (CTZ), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), cefiderocol (CFDC) and comparators. Overall, 1605 Gram-negative isolates were consecutively collected during 2019-2021. Enterobacterales represented more than 75% and exhibited >90% susceptibility to CZA (97%), amikacin (91.8%) and meropenem (90.6%). ESBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates showed high rates of susceptibility towards CZA (100%), carbapenems (89.1-100%) and CTZ (84.9-95.1%). MEV displayed the highest activity against KPC-producing Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 0.75/4 mg/L; 92.9% susceptible) followed by CZA (MIC50/90, ≤2/>8 mg/L; 89.3% susceptible), CFDC (MIC50/90, 0.25/4 mg/L, 87.5% susceptible) and colistin (MIC50/90, ≤2/4 mg/L, 83.9% susceptible). High proportions of P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to colistin (97.8%), CZA (97.2%), CTZ (96.1%) and amikacin (94.5%). CFDC showed potent activity against Acinetobacter baumannii (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/L; 97.2% susceptible), multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L; 96% susceptible), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L; 100% susceptible).

Evolution of β-lactamase-mediated cefiderocol resistance

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore β-lactam with improved hydrolytic stability toward β-lactamases, including carbapenemases, achieved by combining structural moieties of two clinically efficient cephalosporins, ceftazidime and cefepime. Consequently, cefiderocol represents a treatment alternative for infections caused by MDR Gram-negatives.

OBJECTIVES

To study the role of cefiderocol on resistance development and on the evolution of β-lactamases from all Ambler classes, including KPC-2, CTX-M-15, NDM-1, CMY-2 and OXA-48.

METHODS

Directed evolution, using error-prone PCR followed by selective plating, was utilized to investigate how the production and the evolution of different β-lactamases cause changes in cefiderocol susceptibility determined using microbroth dilution assays (MIC and IC50).

RESULTS

We found that the expression of blaOXA-48 did not affect cefiderocol susceptibility. On the contrary, the expression of blaKPC-2, blaCMY-2, blaCTX-M-15 and blaNDM-1 substantially reduced cefiderocol susceptibility by 4-, 16-, 8- and 32-fold, respectively. Further, directed evolution on these enzymes showed that, with the acquisition of only 1-2 non-synonymous mutations, all β-lactamases were evolvable to further cefiderocol resistance by 2- (NDM-1, CTX-M-15), 4- (CMY-2), 8- (OXA-48) and 16-fold (KPC-2). Cefiderocol resistance development was often associated with collateral susceptibility changes including increased resistance to ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam as well as functional trade-offs against different β-lactam drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of contemporary β-lactamase genes can potentially contribute to cefiderocol resistance development and the acquisition of mutations in these genes results in enzymes adapting to increasing cefiderocol concentrations. Resistance development caused clinically important cross-resistance, especially against ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam.

Evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm for rapid identification of Gram-negative species and detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase directly from blood cultures

Objectives

To evaluate a rapid diagnostic algorithm based on MALDI-TOF MS, lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) and molecular testing performed directly from positive blood cultures (BCs) for Gram-negative species identification and detection of CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases and main carbapenemases.

Methods

Non-duplicate BCs positive to Gram-negative bacteria at microscope examination were subjected to species identification by direct MALDI-TOF MS following recovery of bacterial pellet by Rapid MBT Sepsityper® kit. Subsequently, NG-Test® CARBA 5 and NG-Test® CTX-M MULTI LFIAs were performed according to identified microbial species. Eazyplex® SuperBug CRE molecular assay was performed in cases of NG-Test® CARBA 5 negative results in patients with documented carbapenemase-producers carriage. Results of rapid diagnostic workflow were compared with those obtained by conventional diagnostic routine.

Results

Overall, the direct MALDI-TOF MS protocol allowed reliable identification to the species level of 92.1% of the 2133 monomicrobial BCs. Rate of matched identification was significantly higher for Enterobacterales (97.3%) in comparison to non-fermenting Gram-negative species (80.2%), obligate anaerobic bacteria (42.1%) and fastidious Gram-negative species (41.5%). The overall sensitivity of NG-Test® CARBA 5 and NG-Test® CTX-M MULTI was 92.2% and 91.6%, respectively. Integration of Easyplex® SuperBug CRE allowed the detection of blaKPC mutants associated with ceftazidime/avibactam resistance, reaching 100% sensitivity in carbapenemase detection. Both LFIAs and molecular testing showed no false-positive results.

Conclusions

Algorithms based on MALDI-TOF MS, LFIAs and molecular testing may represent a cost-effective tool to timely identify Gram-negative species and detect resistance markers directly from BCs. According to local epidemiology, these results may allow antimicrobial stewardship interventions including prompt use of new approved drugs.

Cefiderocol: Systematic Review of Mechanisms of Resistance, Heteroresistance and In Vivo Emergence of Resistance

Cefiderocol appears promising, as it can overcome most β-lactam resistance mechanisms (including β-lactamases, porin mutations, and efflux pumps). Resistance is uncommon according to large multinational cohorts, including against isolates resistant to carbapenems, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and colistin. However, alarming proportions of resistance have been reported in some recent cohorts (up to 50%). A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Scopus from inception to May 2022 to review mechanisms of resistance, prevalence of heteroresistance, and in vivo emergence of resistance to cefiderocol during treatment. A variety of mechanisms, typically acting in concert, have been reported to confer resistance to cefiderocol: β-lactamases (especially NDM, KPC and AmpC variants conferring resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, OXA-427, and PER- and SHV-type ESBLs), porin mutations, and mutations affecting siderophore receptors, efflux pumps, and target (PBP-3) modifications. Coexpression of multiple β-lactamases, often in combination with permeability defects, appears to be the main mechanism of resistance. Heteroresistance is highly prevalent (especially in A. baumannii), but its clinical impact is unclear, considering that in vivo emergence of resistance appears to be low in clinical studies. Nevertheless, cases of in vivo emerging cefiderocol resistance are increasingly being reported. Continued surveillance of cefiderocol’s activity is important as this agent is introduced in clinical practice.

Structural Characterization of the D179N and D179Y Variants of KPC-2 β-Lactamase: Ω-Loop Destabilization as a Mechanism of Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC-2 and KPC-3) present a global clinical threat, as these β-lactamases confer resistance to carbapenems and oxyimino-cephalosporins. Recent clinically identified KPC variants with substitutions at Ambler position D179, located in the Ω loop, are resistant to the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime-avibactam, but susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam. To gain insights into ceftazidime-avibactam resistance conferred by D179N/Y variants of KPC-2, crystal structures of these variants were determined. The D179N KPC-2 structure revealed that the change of the carboxyl to an amide moiety at position 179 disrupted the salt bridge with R164 present in wild-type KPC-2. Additional interactions were disrupted in the Ω loop, causing a decrease in the melting temperature. Shifts originating from N179 were also transmitted toward the active site, including ∼1-Å shifts of the deacylation water and interacting residue N170. The structure of the D179Y KPC-2 β-lactamase revealed more drastic changes, as this variant exhibited disorder of the Ω loop, with other flanking regions also being disordered. We postulate that the KPC-2 variants can accommodate ceftazidime because the Ω loop is displaced in D179Y or can be more readily displaced in D179N KPC-2. To understand why the β-lactamase inhibitor vaborbactam is less affected by the D179 variants than avibactam, we determined the crystal structure of D179N KPC-2 in complex with vaborbactam, which revealed wild-type KPC-2-like vaborbactam-active site interactions. Overall, the structural results regarding KPC-2 D179 variants revealed various degrees of destabilization of the Ω loop that contribute to ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, possible substrate-assisted catalysis of ceftazidime, and meropenem and meropenem-vaborbactam susceptibility.

Cefiderocol for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Systematic Review of Currently Available Evidence

Cefiderocol is a novel synthetic siderophore-conjugated antibiotic that hijacks the bacterial iron transport systems facilitating drug entry into cells, achieving high periplasmic concentrations. This systematic review analyzed the currently available literature on cefiderocol. It summarized in vitro susceptibility data, in vivo antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), clinical efficacy, safety and resistance mechanisms of cefiderocol. Cefiderocol has potent in vitro and in vivo activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant isolates. But New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)- positive isolates showed significantly higher MICs than other carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, with a susceptible rate of 83.4% for cefiderocol. Cefiderocol is well-tolerated, and the PK/PD target values can be achieved using a standard dose regimen or adjusted doses according to renal function. Clinical trials demonstrated that cefiderocol was non-inferiority to the comparator drugs in treating complicated urinary tract infection and nosocomial pneumonia. Case reports and series showed that cefiderocol was a promising therapeutic agent in carbapenem-resistant infections. However, resistant isolates and reduced susceptibility during treatment to cefiderocol have already been reported. In conclusion, cefiderocol is a promising powerful weapon for treating MDR recalcitrant infections.

Occurrence of multi-carbapenemases producers among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and in vitro activity of combinations including cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and aztreonam in the COVID-19 era

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of multi-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (EB) and the activity of cefiderocol (CFDC), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and combinations of CZA plus aztreonam (ATM), MEV plus ATM and CFDC plus CZA against them.

METHODS

A collection of carbapenemase-producing EB clinical isolates (n = 1242) was investigated by lateral flow immunoassay NG-Test CARBA-5 and molecular testing. Cefiderocol MICs were determined using broth microdilution SensititreTM panel. MICs of CZA and MEV were determined by the gradient diffusion method. Antimicrobial synergy testing was performed using gradient diffusion strip crossing.

RESULTS

KPC were the most frequent carbapenemases (83.2%), followed by VIM (9.2 %), OXA-48-like (4.3 %) and NDM enzymes (4.1%). Multi-carbapenemase producers were found in 10 (0.8%) isolates. Three combinations of two different carbapenemases were observed: KPC+VIM (n = 4), NDM+OXA-48-like (n = 4), and VIM+OXA-48-like (n = 2). CFDC showed potent activity against eight out of ten dual-carbapenemases producers, while resistance or reduced susceptibility was shown towards CZA and MEV. CFDC in combination with CZA showed no synergistic effects and only two additive effects on seven (87.5%) of the CFDC-susceptible strains. Conversely, CZA plus ATM and MEV plus ATM combinations were synergistic against all ATM-resistant strains regardless of dual-carbapenemases phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of multi-carbapenemase producers is not uncommon in Northern Italy area. MEV in combination with ATM might be considered as a potential therapeutic option, alternative to CZA plus ATM. CFDC susceptibility testing and synergy evaluation of ATM-based combinations should be performed in the lab routine to evaluate the most in vitro active antimicrobial regimen.

Co-resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in clinical isolates producing KPC variants

Cefiderocol (FDC) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) are among the latest generation of commercialized antibiotics against carbapenem-resistant Gram negatives. However, emergence of CZA resistance is being increasingly reported, involving different KPC variants in Enterobacterales. By analyzing two CZA-resistant KPC-3 clinical variants, KPC-41 and KPC-50, we showed that KPC-41, and to a lesser extent KPC-50, may also have an impact on susceptibility to FDC leading to a cross-resistance. This feature highlights that a susceptibility testing to FDC is mandatory prior any clinical use of FDC for treating infections due to KPC producers.