Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine combination chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer

Anticancer effect of aromatic isoniazid derivatives in human gastric adenocarcinoma cells

Current treatments for stomach cancer are often effective in curing cancer. However, these treatments can also have significant side effects, and they may not be effective in all cases. Hence synthetic compounds exhibit promise as potential agents for cancer treatment. In a previous study, we identified (E)-N'- (2,3,4-trihydroxybenzylidene) isonicotinohydrazide (ITHB4) as a novel antimycobacterial derivative of isoniazid with cytotoxic effects on the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. This led us to investigate the potential anti-cancer properties of ITHB4 against adenocarcinoma gastric (AGS) cell line. The cytotoxic effect of ITHB4 has been determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and further confirmed for anticancer properties by means of apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), nuclear fragmentation, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), caspases, cytokines and morphological including phenotypic changes of cells assay. The ITHB4 demonstrated a lower IC50 in inhibiting growth of AGS cells at 24 h compared to 48 and 72 h. ITHB4 has also shown no toxicity human immune cells. Treatment of ITHB4 against AGS for 24 h eventually lead to formation of early apoptotic AGS cells, reduced mitochondrial membrane potential, nuclear condensation, and nuclear fragmentation lastly increased in ROS levels together with the release of LDH, and secretion of caspases. The altered cytokine profile in ITHB4 treated AGS hints at the possibility that ITHB4 may possess anti-tumor and anti-inflammatory properties. Our results in this study demonstrate that ITHB4 has almost similar chemotherapeutic properties against gastric adenocarcinoma cells compared to breast cancer cell. This is suggesting that the anticancer capabilities of this compound should be in vivo and clinically assessed.

Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with localized gastric cancer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on the management of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

Feasibility of modified docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine followed by capecitabine as maintenance chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine (DOC) combination chemotherapy, followed by maintenance capecitabine as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 35 mg/m (days 1-8), l-OHP 85 mg/m (day 1), and capecitabine 750 mg/m twice daily (days 1-14), every 3 weeks. After six cycles of DOC, patients who did not progress received maintenance treatment with three-weekly capecitabine 1000 mg/m twice daily (days 1-14), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Six-month disease control rate (DCR) was the primary endpoint and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were the secondary endpoints. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate OS and PFS. Between July 2014 and September 2017, 37 patients with metastatic gastric or GEJ cancer were enrolled at our institution. Upon completion of the DOC regimen, 35 patients (94.5%) received capecitabine as maintenance chemotherapy for a median of 7 cycles (range, 3-14 cycles). The six-month DCR was 83.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71.8-95.6%], median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.3-9.8 months), and median OS was 14.4 months (95% CI, 11.7-18.6 months). During DOC chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (29.7%), anemia (10.8%), and diarrhea (10.8%). During maintenance treatment, toxicity was sporadic and mainly of grade 1-2. Modified DOC followed by capecitabine as maintenance chemotherapy seems to be an active and well tolerated first-line treatment strategy for patients with metastatic gastric and GEJ cancer.

Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil (DOF) in Metastatic and Unresectable Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Phase II Study with Long-Term Follow-Up

Lessons Learned.

Adding docetaxel to the modified FOLFOX7 backbone (DOF) is a feasible three‐drug combination therapy for advanced gastric cancer with high activity, providing evidence that leucovorin is not necessary in this setting.

The DOF regimen represents an alternative to the FLOT (5‐FU 2,600 mg/m² as 24‐hour infusion with leucovorin 200 mg/m², oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², and docetaxel 50 mg/m²) regimen that can be considered in select patients with advanced gastric cancer and is a potential choice in the curative setting.

Background.

The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) demonstrates high response rates in advanced gastric cancer, albeit with increased toxicity. Given the efficacy of platinum‐taxane‐fluoropyrimidine regimens, this phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and 5‐FU (DOF) for the treatment of metastatic or unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

Methods.

Patients with metastatic or unresectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma with no prior therapy for metastatic disease received docetaxel 50 mg/m² on day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² on day 1, and 5‐FU 2,400 mg/m² continuous intravenous infusion over 46 hours; cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR).

Results.

Forty‐four patients were enrolled. Assessment of treatment response and toxicity was feasible in 41 and 43 patients, respectively. ORR was 73.2% (68.3% partial response; 4.9% complete response). Therapy was discontinued for progressive disease in 53%, toxicity in 26%, and death on treatment in 16%. Two patients underwent surgical resection. Thirty‐three patients (76.7%) received at least seven cycles (7–34). Grade 3–4 toxicities occurred in 31 patients (72.1%), including neutropenia (23.3%), neurologic (20.9%), and diarrhea (14.0%). Median overall survival was 10.3 months.

Conclusion.

DOF demonstrates a high response rate, expected safety profile, and prolonged survival and remains an option for select patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Multifunctional Compounds for Activation of the p53-Y220C Mutant in Cancer

The p53 protein plays a major role in cancer prevention, and over 50 % of cancer diagnoses can be attributed to p53 malfunction. The common p53 mutation Y220C causes local protein unfolding, aggregation, and can result in a loss of Zn in the DNA-binding domain. Structural analysis has shown that this mutant creates a surface site that can be stabilized using small molecules, and herein a multifunctional approach to restore function to p53-Y220C is reported. A series of compounds has been designed that contain iodinated phenols aimed for interaction and stabilization of the p53-Y220C surface cavity, and Zn-binding fragments for metallochaperone activity. Their Zn-binding affinity was characterized using spectroscopic methods and demonstrate the ability of compounds L4 and L5 to increase intracellular levels of Zn²⁺ in a p53-Y220C-mutant cell line. The in vitro cytotoxicity of our compounds was initially screened by the National Cancer Institute (NCI-60), followed by testing in three stomach cancer cell lines with varying p53 status', including AGS (WTp53), MKN1 (V143A), and NUGC3 (Y220C). Our most promising ligand, L5, is nearly 3-fold more cytotoxic than cisplatin in a large number of cell lines. The impressive cytotoxicity of L5 is further maintained in a NUGC3 3D spheroid model. L5 also induces Y220C-specific apoptosis in a cleaved caspase-3 assay, reduces levels of unfolded mutant p53, and recovers p53 transcriptional function in the NUGC3 cell line. These results show that these multifunctional scaffolds have the potential to restore wild-type function in mutant p53-Y220C.

The clinical significance of PD-L1 in advanced gastric cancer is dependent on ARID1A mutations and ATM expression

Whether PD-L1 expression is associated with survival outcomes in gastric cancer (GC) is controversial. The inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is effective against genomically unstable tumors. Hypothesizing that also the clinical significance of PD-L1 might be dependent on the activation of molecular circuits ensuring genomic stability, we evaluated PD-L1 expression in tissue samples from 72 advanced GC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy. Samples were already characterized for DNA damage repair (DDR) component expression (pATM, pChk1, pWee1, γ-H2AX and pRPA2) along with mutations in DDR-linked genes (TP53 and ARID1A). Overall, PD-L1 expression was not associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), independently on whether we considered its expression in tumor cells (PD-L1-TCs) or in the immune infiltrate (PD-L1-TILs). In subgroup analysis, positive PD-L1-TC immunostaining was associated with better PFS in patients whose tumors did not carry DDR activation (multivariate Cox: HR 0.34, 95%CI: 0.15-0.76, p = 0.008). This subset (DDR^off) was characterized by negative pATM expression or the presence of ARID1A mutations. Conversely, the relationship between PD-L1-TC expression and PFS was lost in a molecular scenario denoting DDR activation (DDR^on), as defined by concomitant pATM expression and ARID1A wild-type form. Surprisingly, while PD-L1-TC expression was associated with better OS in the DDR^off subset (multivariate Cox: HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.17-0.96, p = 0.039), in the DDR^on subgroup we observed an opposite impact on OS (multivariate Cox: HR 2.56, 95%CI: 1.06-6.16, p = 0.036). Thus, PD-L1-TC expression may impact survival outcomes in GC on the basis of the activation/inactivation of genome-safeguarding pathways.

Dose-finding study of intensive weekly alternating schedule of docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin, FD/FOx regimen, in metastatic gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Proper administration timing, dose-intensity, efficacy/toxicity ratio of triplet docetaxel (DTX), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and oxaliplatin (OXP) should be improved to safely perform three-drugs intensive first line in advanced gastric cancer (GC). This dose-finding study investigated recommended 5-FU and OXP doses, safety of triplet regimen and preliminary activity.

METHODS

Schedule: 12h-timed-flat-infusion 5-FU 700-1000 mg/m2/d 1-2, 8-9, 15-16, 22-23, with 100 mg/m2/d increase for dose level; DTX 50 mg/m2 d 1, 15 fixed dose, OXP at three increasing dose-levels 60-70-80 mg/m2 d 8, 22, every 4 weeks. Intra- and inter-patients dose-escalation was planned.

RESULTS

Ten fit <75 years patients were enrolled: median age 59; young-elderly 4 (40%). From first to fifth dose level, 5 patients (1 per cohort) were enrolled according to intra-patient dose escalation, no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) were reported. At sixth level, 1 DLT, G2 diarrhea, was reported, thus other 2 patients were enrolled, DLT 1/3 patients (33%). Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. 5-FU and OXP recommended doses (RD) were 1000 mg/m2/d and 80 mg/m2, respectively. To confirm RD, other 3 patients were enrolled, without DLT. Cumulative G3-4 toxicities were: neutropenia 50%, leucopenia 20%, hypoalbuminemia 10%, mucositis 10%, asthenia 20%. Limiting toxicity syndromes were 30%, 25% in young-elderly, all multiple site. Objective response rate intent-to-treat 60%, disease control rate 90%. After 15 months follow-up, progression-free and overall survival, 6 and 17 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

First line intensive FD/FOx regimen adding DXT/5-FU/OXP can be safely administered at recommended doses in advanced GC, with promising high activity and efficacy.

Expression of the Hippo transducer TAZ in association with WNT pathway mutations impacts survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy

Background

An extensive crosstalk co-regulates the Hippo and Wnt pathway. Preclinical studies revealed that the Hippo transducers YAP/TAZ mediate a number of oncogenic functions in gastric cancer (GC). Moreover, comprehensive characterization of GC demonstrated that the Wnt pathway is targeted by oncogenic mutations. On this ground, we hypothesized that YAP/TAZ- and Wnt-related biomarkers may predict clinical outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy.

Methods

In the present study, we included 86 patients with advanced GC treated with first-line chemotherapy in prospective phase II trials or in routine clinical practice. Tissue samples were immunostained to evaluate the expression of YAP/TAZ. Mutational status of key Wnt pathway genes (CTNNB1, APC and FBXW7) was assessed by targeted DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS). Survival curves were estimated and compared by the Kaplan–Meier product-limit method and the log-rank test, respectively. Variables potentially affecting progression-free survival (PFS) were verified in univariate Cox proportional hazard models. The final multivariate Cox models were obtained with variables testing significant at the univariate analysis, and by adjusting for all plausible predictors of the outcome of interest (PFS).

Results

We observed a significant association between TAZ expression and Wnt mutations (Chi-squared p = 0.008). Combined TAZ expression and Wnt mutations (TAZ^pos/WNT^mut) was more frequently observed in patients with the shortest progression-free survival (negative outliers) (Fisher p = 0.021). Uni-and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that patients whose tumors harbored the TAZ^pos/WNT^mut signature had an increased risk of disease progression (univariate Cox: HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.27–4.05, p = 0.006; multivariate Cox: HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.41–5.29, p = 0.003). Finally, the TAZ^pos/WNT^mut signature negatively impacted overall survival.

Conclusions

Collectively, our findings indicate that the oncogenic YAP/TAZ–Wnt crosstalk may be active in GC, conferring chemoresistant traits that translate into adverse survival outcomes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12967-018-1385-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

miR‑21‑5p confers doxorubicin resistance in gastric cancer cells by targeting PTEN and TIMP3

Drug resistance and disease recurrence are major obstacles to the effective treatment of cancer, including gastric cancer (GC). However, the mechanisms of drug resistance remain to be fully elucidated. The present study investigated the roles of microRNA (miR)-21-5p in the doxorubicin (DOX) resistance of GC cells and the underlying mechanisms. miR-21-5p expression levels were identified to be inversely correlated with two well-known tumor suppressor genes, phosphatase and tensin homologue and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases 3, and were upregulated in GC cell lines in proportion to their degree of resistance. Suppressing miR-21-5p expression partially sensitized SGC7901/DOX cells to DOX, suggesting that knockdown of miR-21-5p expression may be used as a therapeutic strategy to improve GC cell resistance. Importantly, increased miR-21-5p expression levels at diagnosis were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics including advanced stage and poor prognosis, further implying that a relapse of GC may be a consequence of miR-21-5p upregulation, thus providing evidence for the potential utility of miR-21-5p antagonism to sensitize GC cells to DOX chemotherapy.

DNA damage repair and survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy

The DNA damage response (DDR) network is exploited by cancer cells to withstand chemotherapy. Gastric cancer (GC) carries deregulation of the DDR and harbors genetic defects that fuel its activation. The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1-Wee1 axes are deputed to initiate DNA repair. Overactivation of these pathways in cancer cells may represent an adaptive response for compensating genetic defects deregulating G₁ -S transition (e.g., TP53) and ATM/ATR-initiated DNA repair (e.g., ARID1A). We hypothesized that DDR-linked biomarkers may predict clinical outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical assessment of DDR kinases (pATM, pChk2, pChk1 and pWee1) and DNA damage markers (γ-H2AX and pRPA32) was performed in biological samples from 110 advanced GC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, either in phase II trials or in routine clinical practice. In 90 patients, this characterization was integrated with targeted ultra-deep sequencing for evaluating the mutational status of TP53 and ARID1A. We recorded a positive association between the investigated biomarkers. The combination of two biomarkers (γ-H2AX^high /pATM^high ) was an adverse factor for both progression-free survival (multivariate Cox: HR 2.23, 95%CI: 1.47-3.40) and overall survival (multivariate Cox: HR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.20-3.58). The relationship between the γ-H2AX^high /pATM^high model and progression-free survival was consistent across the different TP53 backgrounds and was maintained in the ARID1A wild-type setting. Conversely, this association was no longer observed in an ARID1A-mutated subgroup. The γ-H2AX^high /pATM^high model negatively impacted survival outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy. The mutational status of ARID1A, but apparently not TP53 mutations, affects its predictive significance.

Capecitabine for the treatment of gastric cancer

Capecitabine is an orally administered prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and was designed to specifically affect tumor cells more than normal tissues. Capecitabine is as effective and well tolerated as infusional 5-FU in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Following the REAL-2 and ML17032 studies, capecitabine has replaced infusional 5-FU for treating GC. Capecitabine plus platinum is one of the most widely used regimens for the first-line treatment of AGC, regardless of HER2 status. The adjuvant capecitabine/oxaliplatin regimen is one therapeutic option for resectable gastric cancer, especially after D2 resection. Compared with S-1, capecitabine has been shown to have a similar efficacy, but is associated with fewer ethnic differences than S-1, which accounts for the more widespread usage of capecitabine worldwide.

Phase II study of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 therapy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although the docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin triplet has yielded significant improvements in time to progression, overall survival, and overall response rate, the high incidence of severe adverse events limits the use of the docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin triplet. To overcome this limitation, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 for the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with pathologically proven unresectable recurrent or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma were assessed for eligibility. Docetaxel at 52.5 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin at 105 mg/m(2) were administered intravenously on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally at 80 mg/m(2) on days 1-14 of every 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (median age 54.5 years) were enrolled. All patients had metastatic disease. A total of 340 cycles of chemotherapy were administered (median of eight cycles per patient; range 1-36 cycles). Toxicities were evaluated in 43 patients, and the responses were evaluated in 40 patients. Major toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia (37.2 %) and leukopenia (27.9 %). The overall response rate was 54.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 40.1-68.3 %] in the intention-to-treat population. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.6 months (95 % CI 6.2-9.0 months) and 12.0 months (95 % CI 6.9-17.2 months), respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that the docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 combination regimen is effective and relatively well tolerable, and it seems to have potential to be a reasonable therapeutic strategy in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

Trastuzumab and bevacizumab combined with docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine as first-line treatment of advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of bevacizumab and trastuzumab combined with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (B-DOCT) as first-line treatment of advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

In this multicentre, single-arm, phase II study, tumor HER2 status was determined centrally prior to treatment. Patients with advanced HER2-positive adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction (immunohistochemistry 3+ or immunohistochemistry 2+/silver in-situ hybridization positive) were treated with six cycles of bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg (day 1), docetaxel 50 mg/m(2) (day 1), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) (day 1), capecitabine 850 mg/m(2) b.i.d. (days 1-14), and trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (day 1) every three weeks, followed by maintenance with bevacizumab, capecitabine, and trastuzumab until disease progression. The primary objective was to demonstrate an improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) to >7.6 months (observed in the ToGA trial) determined according to the lower limit of the 95 % confidence interval (CI). Secondary endpoints were safety, objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with HER2-positive tumors were treated with B-DOCT between March 2011 and September 2014. At a median follow-up of 17 months, median PFS was 10.8 months (95%CI: 9.0-NA), OS was 17.9 months (95%CI: 12.4-NA). One-year PFS and OS were 52 % and 79 %, respectively. The ORR was 74 % (95%CI: 52-90 %). Two patients became resectable during treatment with B-DOCT and achieved a pathological complete response. The most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events were: neutropenia (16 %), diarrhoea (16 %), and hypertension (16 %).

CONCLUSIONS

B-DOCT is a safe and active combination in HER2-positive GC, supporting further investigations of DOC with HER2/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition in HER2-positive GC.

DCF intraperitoneal and intravenous dual chemotherapy regimen for advanced gastric cancer: A feasibility study

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common type of cancer globally and accounts for the second highest cancer-associated mortality rate in the world. Current treatment strategies for gastric cancer include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy may increase the IP concentrations of chemotherapy drugs and reduce the systemic toxicity. At present, IP chemotherapy is used to treat patients with advanced gastric cancer, which has a high rate of peritoneal recurrence. The present study evaluated the feasibility of using docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) in an IP and intravenous (IV) dual chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. The treatment-associated adverse reactions and preliminary efficacy were reported. The first dose level utilized the full dose of DCF: Docetaxel, day one, 45 mg/m2 (IP) and day eight, 30 mg/m2 (IV); cisplatin (DDP), day one, 75 mg/m2 (IP); and fluorouracil (FU), days one to five, 750 mg/m2 (continuous IV). A total of six patients were treated at this level and two patients withdrew due to serious adverse reactions. Taking into account that the the tolerated doses used in combination regimens for Eastern populations are lower than that of the corresponding doses for Western populations, the dosages of the three drugs were all reduced by 20% in the application of the second dose level: Docetaxel, day one, 30 mg/m2 (IP) and day eight, 30 mg/m2 (IV); DDP, day two, 60 mg/m2 (IP); and FU, days one to five, 600 mg/m2 (continuous IV). A total of 26 patients were treated at this level. The main adverse reaction was bone marrow suppression, with grade III/IV neutropenia, leukopenia and febrile neutropenia accounting for 61.5, 53.8 and 19.2% of reactions, respectively, and grade III/IV anemia and thrombocytopenia accounting for 19.2 and 15.4% of reactions, respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse reactions primarily consisted of abdominal pain, with grade III/IV abdominal pain accounting for 30.8% of reactions. Only 7.7% of the patients withdrew from the treatment. The median time to progression (TTP) was five months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0-9.0 months], and the median overall survival (OS) was nine months (95% CI, 7.4-10.6 months). It was concluded that the DCF regimen with reduced dosage should be applied. IP and IV dual chemotherapy for the treatment of unresectable advanced gastric cancer is tolerated and demonstrated a good initial efficacy. Strategies for mitigating and reducing the adverse gastrointestinal reactions, particularly abdominal pain, may be the focus of future studies.

Trial Watch: Chemotherapy with immunogenic cell death inducers

Accumulating evidence suggests that the clinical efficacy of selected anticancer drugs, including conventional chemotherapeutics as well as targeted anticancer agents, originates (at least in part) from their ability to elicit a novel or reinstate a pre-existing tumor-specific immune response. One of the mechanisms whereby chemotherapy can stimulate the immune system to recognize and destroy malignant cells is commonly known as immunogenic cell death (ICD). Cancer cells succumbing to ICD are de facto converted into an anticancer vaccine and as such elicit an adaptive immune response. Several common chemotherapeutics share the ability of triggering ICD, as demonstrated in vaccination experiments relying on immunocompetent mice and syngeneic cancer cells. A large number of ongoing clinical trials involve such ICD inducers, often (but not always) as they are part of the gold standard therapeutic approach against specific neoplasms. In this Trial Watch, we summarize the latest advances on the use of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and mitoxantrone in cancer patients, discussing high-impact studies that have been published during the last 13 months as well as clinical trials that have been initiated in the same period to assess the antineoplastic profile of these immunogenic drugs as off-label therapeutic interventions.