Insertion-deletion rate is a qualitative aspect of the tumor mutation burden associated with the clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab

Phase 2 study of neoadjuvant durvalumab plus docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 with surgery and adjuvant durvalumab plus S-1 for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Based on the phase 3 PRODIGY study, neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) have emerged as a viable treatment option for Asian patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining neoadjuvant durvalumab with DOS, followed by surgery and adjuvant durvalumab plus S-1 chemotherapy, for resectable LAGC.

METHODS

Patients with LAGC with cT2/3N+or cT4Nany tumors were enrolled in this study. Patients with proficient mismatch repair protein (pMMR) tumors received three cycles of neoadjuvant durvalumab plus DOS, administered every 3 weeks, followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 plus durvalumab (main study arm). The primary endpoints were the rate of pathologic complete regression (pCR) and safety. An exploratory arm evaluated patients with deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) tumors, who received three cycles of neoadjuvant durvalumab and tremelimumab, followed by surgery and adjuvant durvalumab.

RESULTS

In the main study arm, 50 pMMR patients were enrolled, and received at least one dose of neoadjuvant treatment. The median age was 63 years, with 72.0% being men. 18 and 32 patients presented with clinical stage II and III tumors, respectively. 49 (98.0%) underwent surgery, with 45 achieving R0 resection. A pCR rate of 30.0% was observed, meeting the prespecified primary efficacy endpoint. With a median follow-up of 21.8 months, the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 69.9% and 88.1%, respectively. 10% of patients experienced predefined unacceptable severe toxicities, including febrile neutropenia (n=3) and persistent G4 neutropenia (n=2) lasting more than 7 days, thereby meeting the primary safety endpoint. Nine patients with dMMR tumors were enrolled in the exploratory arm. All nine underwent surgery, with a pCR rate of 22.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study met its primary efficacy and safety endpoints. The combination of neoadjuvant durvalumab plus DOS, followed by surgery and adjuvant durvalumab plus S-1 chemotherapy, warrants further investigation in a phase 3 trial for Asian patients with LAGC.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

04221555.

Blood TCTP as a potential biomarker associated with immunosuppressive features and poor clinical outcomes in metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

No established biomarker exists for specific myeloid cell populations or in gastric cancer. This study aimed to explore the prognostic and immunological relevance of plasma translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy.

METHODS

Plasma samples were prospectively collected from the cohorts of patients with gastric cancer treated with first-line fluoropyrimidine plus platinum chemotherapy (n=143, cohort 1) and third-line nivolumab (n=165, cohort 2). Plasma TCTP levels were quantified using ELISA, and multiplex proteomic analysis (Olink) was conducted to assess expression levels of immune-related proteins. External single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial transcriptomics datasets were employed to validate the findings.

RESULTS

Patients with high plasma TCTP levels (TCTP-high group) exhibited poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with first-line chemotherapy compared with those with low levels (TCTP-low group) in cohort 1 (HR: 1.73 for PFS; 1.77 for OS). In the TCTP-high group, proteins associated with immunosuppressive myeloid cells, angiogenesis, and immune exclusion of T/natural killer (NK) cell function were upregulated, whereas proteins involved in T-cell activation/exhaustion were significantly upregulated in the TCTP-low group. scRNA-seq analyses identified a myeloid subset with high TPT1 (encoding TCTP) expression and TCTP-related molecules, enriched with inhibitory myeloid inflammation gene signatures and providing inhibitory signals to T/NK cells (Macrophage-chemokine). Spatial transcriptomics analyses revealed a tumor-cell-enriched cluster co-localized with the Macrophage-chemokine subset, which exhibited the highest TPT1 expression and a positive correlation between its abundance and average TPT1 levels. In nivolumab-treated patients (cohort 2), the high TCTP group was associated with poor survival outcomes (HR: 1.39 for PFS; 1.47 for OS).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma TCTP is a prognostic biomarker, reflecting clinically relevant immunosuppressive myeloid signals in patients with gastric cancer.

Uncovering the potential of APOD as a biomarker in gastric cancer: A retrospective and multi-center study

Gastric cancer (GC) poses a significant health challenge worldwide, necessitating the identification of predictive biomarkers to improve prognosis. Dysregulated lipid metabolism is a well-recognized hallmark of tumorigenesis, prompting investigation into apolipoproteins (APOs). In this study, we focused on apolipoprotein D (APOD) following comprehensive analyses of APOs in pan-cancer. Utilizing data from the TCGA-STAD and GSE62254 cohorts, we elucidated associations between APOD expression and multiple facets of GC, including prognosis, tumor microenvironment (TME), cancer biomarkers, mutations, and immunotherapy response, and identified potential anti-GC drugs. Single-cell analyses and immunohistochemical staining confirmed APOD expression in fibroblasts within the GC microenvironment. Additionally, we independently validated the prognostic significance of APOD in the ZN-GC cohort. Our comprehensive analyses revealed that high APOD expression in GC patients was notably associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes, reduced microsatellite instability and tumor mutation burden, alterations in the TME, and diminished response to immunotherapy. These findings provide valuable insights into the potential prognostic and therapeutic implications of APOD in GC.

Factors associated with the efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate clinicopathologic factors leading to different clinical outcomes in patients with deficient mismatch repair protein (d-MMR) gastric cancer (GC) treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy (nivolumab chemotherapy).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 28 patients with d-MMR advanced GC treated with first-line nivolumab chemotherapy. As a control group, 68 treated with first-line chemotherapy alone were included. Clinicopathological factors, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), were analyzed with regards to the efficacy outcomes.

RESULTS

Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer (median PFS; not reached [NR] vs. 5.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, P < 0.001), and overall survival (OS) tended to be longer (median OS; NR vs. 17.9 months, HR 0.43, P = 0.057) in patients treated with nivolumab chemotherapy than those treated with chemotherapy. The PFS benefit of nivolumab chemotherapy over chemotherapy was pronounced in the subgroup with a lower NLR (< 3.80 [median NLR]) (HR 0.10), whereas it was less prominent in patients with a high NLR (≥ 3.80) (HR 0.58). Among patients treated with nivolumab chemotherapy, PFS was worse in patients with a higher NLR (≥ 3.80) than in those with a lower NLR (< 3.80), and survival outcomes were similar between those with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and < 5.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab chemotherapy was associated with better efficacy outcomes than chemotherapy alone among patients with d-MMR GC, but survival outcomes were poor even with nivolumab chemotherapy for those with a high NLR. Survival outcomes were not different according to PD-L1 CPS among d-MMR patients treated with nivolumab chemotherapy.

Clinical and Biomarker Analysis of a Phase I/II Study of PDR001 Plus Imatinib for Advanced Treatment-Refractory Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

PURPOSE

In this phase Ib/II study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PDR001, an anti-PD1 antibody, in combination with imatinib in patients with treatment-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced GIST whose disease had progressed on imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib were enrolled. In phase Ib, the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme was applied. Intravenous administration of PDR001 at 400 mg for every 4 weeks plus imatinib (300 and 400 mg daily for dose levels I and II, respectively) was given. The primary outcome for phase II was the disease control rate at 12 weeks. Exploratory biomarker analysis was performed based on PDL1 IHC, next-generation sequencing, and multiplexed IHC.

RESULTS

No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the phase Ib part (n = 10), and dose level II was selected as the recommended phase II dose. In the phase II part (n = 29), there was no objective response, and the disease control rate at 12 weeks was 37.9%, not meeting the primary efficacy endpoint. For patients in phase Ib-dose level II and phase II (n = 36), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 2.3 and 9.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse event was anemia. Exploratory biomarker analysis indicated that a higher CD8+ T-cell density was associated with a favorable PFS but to a limited degree. Tumor mutational burden and PDL1 were not associated with better PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with treatment-refractory GIST, PDR001 in combination with imatinib was generally tolerable, but it was not effective.

Tumor mutation load better predicts the prognosis of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in upper gastrointestinal cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tumor mutational load (TML) has emerged as a potential biomarker for multiple solid tumors. However, data on its prognostic impact on upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer are limited. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prognostic value of TML for the survival of patients with UGI cancer.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to February 13, 2023. Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria. Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival and overall survival and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subsequently, the combined HR and its 95% CI were calculated for UGI tract cancers in the high and low TML groups. I2 statistics and p-values were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Publication bias, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses were performed to determine sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In total, 932 patients with UGI tract cancer from 11 publications were included. The high TML group treated with immunotherapy showed significantly improved overall survival (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.86; p = .001) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.95; p = .020) compared with the low TML group.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that patients with UGI tumors and higher TML have a better prognosis with immunotherapy, suggesting that TML is a promising predictive biomarker for immunotherapy.

REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO Registration No: CRD42023405596).

Association of Baseline Tumor-Specific Neoantigens and CD8+ T-Cell Infiltration With Immune-Related Adverse Events Secondary to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

PURPOSE

Recent evidence has shown that higher tumor mutational burden strongly correlates with an increased risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). By using an integrated multiomics approach, we further studied the association between relevant tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) features and irAEs.

METHODS

Leveraging the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, we extracted cases of suspected irAEs to calculate the reporting odds ratios (RORs) of irAEs for cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). TIME features for 32 cancer types were calculated on the basis of the cancer genomic atlas cohorts and indirectly correlated with each cancer's ROR for irAEs. A separate ICI-treated cohort of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was used to evaluate the correlation between tissue-based immune markers (CD8+, PD-1/L1+, FOXP3+, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs]) and irAE occurrence.

RESULTS

The analysis of 32 cancers and 33 TIME features demonstrated a significant association between irAE RORs and the median number of base insertions and deletions (INDEL), neoantigens (r = 0.72), single-nucleotide variant neoantigens (r = 0.67), and CD8+ T-cell fraction (r = 0.51). A bivariate model using the median number of INDEL neoantigens and CD8 T-cell fraction had the highest accuracy in predicting RORs (adjusted r2 = 0.52, P = .002). Immunoprofile assessment of 156 patients with NSCLC revealed a strong trend for higher baseline median CD8+ T cells within patients' tumors who experienced any grade irAEs. Using machine learning, an expanded ICI-treated NSCLC cohort (n = 378) further showed a treatment duration-independent association of an increased proportion of high TIL (>median) in patients with irAEs (59.7% v 44%, P = .005). This was confirmed by using the Fine-Gray competing risk approach, demonstrating higher baseline TIL density (>median) associated with a higher cumulative incidence of irAEs (P = .028).

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight a potential role for TIME features, specifically INDEL neoantigens and baseline-immune infiltration, in enabling optimal irAE risk stratification of patients.

Genomic characterization and immunotherapy for microsatellite instability-high in cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) is a unique genomic status in many cancers. However, its role in the genomic features and immunotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is unclear. This study aimed to systematically investigate the genomic characterization and immunotherapy efficacy of MSI-H patients with CCA.

METHODS

We enrolled 887 patients with CCA in this study. Tumor samples were collected for next-generation sequencing. Differences in genomic alterations between the MSI-H and microsatellite stability (MSS) groups were analyzed. We also investigated the survival of PD-1 inhibitor-based immunotherapy between two groups of 139 patients with advanced CCA.

RESULTS

Differential genetic alterations between the MSI-H and MSS groups included mutations in ARID1A, ACVR2A, TGFBR2, KMT2D, RNF43, and PBRM1 which were enriched in MSI-H groups. Patients with an MSI-H status have a significantly higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) (median 41.7 vs. 3.1 muts/Mb, P < 0.001) and more positive programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (37.5% vs. 11.9%, P < 0.001) than those with an MSS status. Among patients receiving PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy, those with MSI-H had a longer median overall survival (OS, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.17, P = 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS, HR = 0.14, P < 0.001) than patients with MSS. Integrating MSI-H and PD-L1 expression status (combined positive score ≥ 5) could distinguish the efficacy of immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI-H status was associated with a higher TMB value and more positive PD-L1 expression in CCA tumors. Moreover, in patients with advanced CCA who received PD-1 inhibitor-based immunotherapy, MSI-H and positive PD-L1 expression were associated with improved both OS and PFS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 07/01/2017 (NCT03892577).

The predictive value of tumor mutation burden on survival of gastric cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is a complement to traditional biomarkers related to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The relationship between TMB and the efficacy of ICIs in gastric cancer was controversial. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the predictive value of TMB on survival of gastric cancer patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

We searched the databases PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for articles, then screened eligible articles according to inclusion criteria. The effective data were extracted to calculate the pooled effects of hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), then perform publication bias, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis by STATA 16.0.

RESULTS

The high TMB patients showed significantly longer survival than the low TMB patients (OS: HR 0.65,95% CI 0.55, 0.77, p < 0.001; PFS: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33, 0.77, p = 0.001). In the Asian subgroup, patients with high TMB exhibited better prognosis compared to low TMB (OS: HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.43, 0.72, p < 0.001; PFS: HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28, 0.72, p = 0.001). In the non-Asian subgroup, the survival benefit was observed to be skewed toward patients with high TMB, but it was not statistically significant (OS:HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.32, 1.16, p = 0.133; PFS:HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.31, 1.48, p = 0.322).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that gastric cancer patients with high TMB showed significant benefits from ICIs compared to those with low TMB patients, particularly in Asian populations.

Genomic and transcriptomic profiling indicates the prognosis significance of mutational signature for TMB-high subtype in Chinese patients with gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC)is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in China and immunotherapy emerging as a revolutionary treatment for GC recently. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a predictive biomarker of immunotherapy in multiple cancers. However, the prognostic significance and subtype of TMB in GC is not fully understood.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of TMB in Chinese GC and further classify TMB-high GC (GCTMB-H) patients combing with mutational signatures.

METHODS

Genomic profiling of 435 cancer-gene panel was performed using 206 GC samples from Chinese people. Actionable genetic alterations were compared across all the samples to generate actionable subtyping. The prognostic value of TMB in Chinese GC was evaluated. Mutational signatures were analyzed on TMB-H subtype to stratify the prognosis of TMB. Transcriptomic analysis was applied to compare the distributed immunocytes among different subtypes.

RESULTS

88.3% (182/206) of GC samples had at least one mutation, while 45.1% (93/206) had at least one somatic copy number alteration (SCNA). 29.6% (61/206) of GC samples were TMB-H, including 13 MSI-H and 48 MSS tumors. According to distinct genetic alteration profiles of 69 actionable genes, we classified GC samples into eight molecular subtypes, including TMB-H, ERBB2 amplified, ATM mutated, BRCA2 mutated, CDKN2A/B deleted, PI3KCA mutated, KRAS mutated, and less-mutated subtype. TMB-H subtype presented a remarkable immune-activated phenotype as determined by transcriptomic analysis that was further validated in the TCGA GC cohort. GCTMB-H patients exhibited significantly better survival (P = 0.047). But Signature 1-high GCTMB-H patients had relatively worse prognosis (P = 0.0209, HR = 2.571) than Signature 1-low GCTMB-H patients from Chinese GC cohort, also validated in TCGA GC cohort, presenting highly activated carbohydrate, fatty acid or lipid metabolism.

CONCLUSION

The Signature 1-high GCTMB-H could be a marker of poor prognosis and is associated with metabolism disorder.

Combination of AKT1 and CDH1 mutations predicts primary resistance to immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal cancer

Background

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is the second most common cancer type with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype that is expected to respond to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, approximately half of the patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer derive no benefit from ICIs. We sought to identify the predictors of primary resistance to ICIs in dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer.

Methods

Three independent cohorts were included: (1) the discovery cohort (65 patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer) with ICI efficacy data and pre-ICIs tissue samples for genomic profile and tumor immune infiltration; (2) the validation cohort (22 patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer) with ICI efficacy data and pre-ICIs plasma samples for genomic profile; and (3) the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) cohort not receiving ICIs (152 patients with MSI-H GI cancer) with genomic profile and survival data.

Results

AKT1 and CDH1 mutations were identified as independent predictors of poor progression-free survival (PFS) and primary resistance to ICIs in dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer. We combined these two genes as an immuno-oncology therapy predictor (IOpred), which could recognize 52.4% (11/21) of dMMR/MSI-H patients with primary resistance to ICIs with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 91.7% (11/12). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated IOpred with a good performance in predicting primary resistance (area under the curve 0.751). Patients with IOpred-Mut (mutant AKT1 or CDH1) GI cancer had significantly shorter PFS (HR=8.36, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS, HR=5.17, p<0.001) than IOpred-WT (wild-type for both AKT1 and CDH1) cases upon ICI treatment. The validation cohort also confirmed the correlation between IOpred-mutation and poorer prognosis (PFS, HR=4.68, p=0.004; OS, HR=15.98, p<0.001) in dMMR/MSI-H patients after ICIs. The PPV of IOpred in identifying primary resistance to ICIs was 80% (4/5) in the validation cohort. Additionally, IOpred-WT patients could be further stratified by tumor mutational burden (TMB), wherein TMB-low patients (TMB ≤26.19 mutations per megabase (Mb)) had a significantly higher primary resistance rate to ICIs (34.8% vs 6.7%, p=0.014) and poorer PFS (HR=3.46, p=0.008) and OS (HR=4.42, p=0.047) than TMB-high patients (TMB >26.19 mutations/Mb).

Conclusions

IOpred was identified as a powerful predictor of primary resistance to ICIs in dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer, which might serve as a promising biomarker to help guide immunotherapy decision-making.