1
|
Holdaway M, Starner J, Patel RR, Salama J, Langer DJ, Ellis JA, Boockvar JA, D'Amico RS, Wernicke AG. Improvement in visual outcomes of patients with base of skull meningioma as a result of evolution in the treatment techniques in the last three decades: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2023; 163:485-503. [PMID: 37354356 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04366-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We systematically reviewed visual outcomes over the last three decades in patients undergoing treatment for base of skull (BOS) meningiomas and provide recommendations to preserve vision. METHODS In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, a search was conducted from 6/1/2022-9/1/2022 using PubMed and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria included (1) patients treated for BOS meningiomas (2) treatment modality specified (3) specifics of surgical techniques and/or dose/fractions of radiotherapy (4) individual patient outcomes of treatment. Each study was assessed for bias based on study design and heterogeneity of results. RESULTS A total of 50 studies were included (N = 2911). When comparing improved vision versus unchanged or worsened vision, studies investigating surgery alone published from 2006 and onward had significantly better visual outcomes compared to pre-2006 studies (p = 0.02). When comparing improved vision versus unchanged or worsened vision, studies investigating combined therapy with surgery and radiation published from 2008 and onward had significantly better visual outcomes compared to pre-2008 studies (p < 0.01). Combined modality therapy was less likely to worsen vision compared to either surgery or radiation monotherapy (p < 0.01). However, surgery and radiation monotherapy were more likely to actually improve outcomes compared to combination therapy (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION For over a decade we have observed improvement in visual outcomes in patients managed for meningioma of BOS, likely attributing the innovation in microsurgical and more targeted and conformal radiation techniques. Combination therapy may be the safest option for preventing worsening of vision, but the highest rates of improving visual function are achieved through monotherapy when indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Starner
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, 130 East 77th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Roshal R Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Joshua Salama
- SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - David J Langer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason A Ellis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - John A Boockvar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randy S D'Amico
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Gabriella Wernicke
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, 130 East 77th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Midline Skull Base Meningiomas: Transcranial and Endonasal Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122878. [PMID: 35740543 PMCID: PMC9220797 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. Over time, several corridors have been proposed, each one carrying its own pros and cons. During the last decades, the endoscopic endonasal route has been asserted among the classic routes for a growing number of midline and paramedian lesions. Therefore, the aim of our paper is to present a comprehensive review of the indications and techniques for the management of skull base meningiomas, emphasizing the ambivalent and complementary role of the low and high routes. Abstract Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. The state of the art of skull base meningiomas accounts for both transcranial, or high, and endonasal, or low, routes. A comprehensive review of the pertinent literature was performed to address the surgical strategies and outcomes of skull base meningioma patients treated through a transcranial approach, an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), or both. Three databases (PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Ovid Embase) have been searched. The review of the literature provided 328 papers reporting the surgical, oncological, and clinical results of different approaches for the treatment of skull base meningiomas. The most suitable surgical corridors for olfactory groove, tuberculum sellae, clival and petroclival and cavernous sinus meningiomas have been analyzed. The EEA was proven to be associated with a lower extent of resection rates and better clinical outcomes compared with transcranial corridors, offering the possibility of achieving the so-called maximal safe resection.
Collapse
|
3
|
Park GO, Park HH, Yoo J, Hong CK, Oh J. Surgical Outcomes of Sphenoid Wing Meningioma with Periorbital Invasion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2022; 65:449-456. [PMID: 35236015 PMCID: PMC9082120 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of sphenoid wing meningioma with periorbital invasion (PI) after operation.
Methods Sixty one patients with sphenoid wing meningioma were enrolled in this study. Their clinical conditions were monitored after the operation and followed up more than 5 years at the outpatient clinic of a single institution. Clinical and radiologic information of the patients were all recorded including the following parameters : presence of PI, presence of peri-tumor structure invasion, pathologic grade, extents of resection, presence of hyperostosis, exophthalmos index (EI), and surgical complications. We compared the above clinical parameters of the patients with sphenoid wing meningioma in the presence or absence of PI (non-PI), then linked the analyzed data with the clinical outcome of the patients.
Results Of 61 cases, there were 14 PI and 47 non-PI patients. PI group showed a significantly higher score of EI (1.37±0.24 vs. 1.00±0.01, p<0.001), more frequent presence of hyperostosis (85.7% vs. 14.3%, p<0.001), and lower rate of gross total resection (GTR) (35.7% vs. 68.1%, p=0.032). The lower score of pre-operative EI, the absence of both PI and hyperostosis, smaller tumor size, and the performance of GTR were associated with lower recurrence rates in the univariate analysis. However, in the multivariate analysis, the performance of GTR was the only significant factor to determine the recurrence rate (p=0.043). The incidences of surgical complications were not statistically different between the subtotal resection (STR) and GTR groups, but it was strongly associated tumor size (p=0.017).
Conclusion The GTR group showed lower recurrence rate than the STR group without differences in the surgical complications. Therefore, the GTR is strongly recommended to treat sphenoid wing meningioma with PI for the better clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ga-On Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Ho Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jihwan Yoo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang-Ki Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jiwoong Oh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Surgical management of anterior clinoidal meningiomas: consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:3387-3400. [PMID: 34398339 PMCID: PMC8599327 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04964-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management of clinoidal meningiomas (CMs) continues to be debated. METHODS We constituted a task force comprising the members of the EANS skull base committee along with international experts to derive recommendations for the management of these tumors. The data from the literature along with contemporary practice patterns were discussed within the task force to generate consensual recommendations. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION This article represents the consensus opinion of the task force regarding pre-operative evaluations, patient's counselling, surgical classification, and optimal surgical strategy. Although this analysis yielded only Class B evidence and expert opinions, it should guide practitioners in the management of patients with clinoidal meningiomas and might form the basis for future clinical trials.
Collapse
|
5
|
El-Bahy K, Ibrahim AM, Abdelmohsen I, Sabry HA. Extradural anterior clinoidectomy in surgical management of clinoidal meningiomas. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s41983-021-00336-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite the recent advances in skull base surgery, microsurgical techniques, and neuroimaging, yet surgical resection of clinoidal meningiomas is still a major challenge. In this study, we present our institution experience in the surgical treatment of anterior clinoidal meningiomas highlighting the role of extradural anterior clinoidectomy in improving the visual outcome and the extent of tumor resection. This is a prospective observational study conducted on 33 consecutive patients with clinoidal meningiomas. The surgical approach utilized consisted of extradural anterior clinoidectomy, optic canal deroofing with falciform ligament opening in all patients. The primary outcome assessment was visual improvement and secondary outcomes were extent of tumor resection, recurrence, and postoperative complications.
Results
The study included 5 males and 28 females with mean age 49.48 ± 11.41 years. Preoperative visual deficit was present in 30 (90.9%) patients. Optic canal involvement was present in 24 (72.7%) patients, ICA encasement was in 16 (48.5%), and cavernous sinus invasion in 8 (24.2%). Vision improved in 21 patients (70%), while 6 patients (20%) had stationary course and 1 patient (3%) suffered postoperative new visual deterioration. Gross total resection was achieved in 24 patients (72.7%). The main factors precluding total removal were cavernous sinus involvement and ICA encasement. Mortality rate was 6.1%; mean follow-up period was 27 ± 13 months.
Conclusions
In this series, the use of extradural anterior clinoidectomy provided a favorable visual outcome and improved the extent of resection in clinoidal meningioma patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ius T, Tel A, Minniti G, Somma T, Solari D, Longhi M, De Bonis P, Scerrati A, Caccese M, Barresi V, Fiorentino A, Gorgoglione L, Lombardi G, Robiony M. Advances in Multidisciplinary Management of Skull Base Meningiomas. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2664. [PMID: 34071391 PMCID: PMC8198762 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The surgical management of Skull Base Meningiomas (SBMs) has radically changed over the last two decades. Extensive surgery for patients with SBMs represents the mainstream treatment; however, it is often challenging due to narrow surgical corridors and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Novel surgical technologies, including three-dimensional (3D) preoperative imaging, neuromonitoring, and surgical instruments, have gradually facilitated the surgical resectability of SBMs, reducing postoperative morbidity. Total removal is not always feasible considering a risky tumor location and invasion of surrounding structures and brain parenchyma. In recent years, the use of primary or adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has progressively increased due to its safety and efficacy in the control of grade I and II meningiomas, especially for small to moderate size lesions. Patients with WHO grade SBMs receiving subtotal surgery can be monitored over time with surveillance imaging. Postoperative management remains highly controversial for grade II meningiomas, and depends on the presence of residual disease, with optional upfront adjuvant radiation therapy or close surveillance imaging in cases with total resection. Adjuvant radiation is strongly recommended in patients with grade III tumors. Although the currently available chemotherapy or targeted therapies available have a low efficacy, the molecular profiling of SBMs has shown genetic alterations that could be potentially targeted with novel tailored treatments. This multidisciplinary review provides an update on the advances in surgical technology, postoperative management and molecular profile of SBMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Ius
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tel
- Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Department of Medicine, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy; (A.T.); (M.R.)
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, 53100 Siena, Italy;
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Teresa Somma
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy; (T.S.); (D.S.)
| | - Domenico Solari
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy; (T.S.); (D.S.)
| | - Michele Longhi
- Unit of Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI), 37128 Verona, Italy;
| | - Pasquale De Bonis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sant’ Anna University Hospital, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (P.D.B.); (A.S.)
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alba Scerrati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sant’ Anna University Hospital, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (P.D.B.); (A.S.)
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Mario Caccese
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.L.)
| | - Valeria Barresi
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Radiation Oncology Department, Advance Radiation Therapy, General Regional Hospital F. Miulli, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy;
| | - Leonardo Gorgoglione
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza”, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.L.)
| | - Massimo Robiony
- Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Department of Medicine, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy; (A.T.); (M.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bunevicius A, Anand RK, Suleiman M, Nabeel AM, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Abdelkarim K, El-Shehaby AMN, Emad RM, Chytka T, Liscak R, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Caceres MP, Mathieu D, Lee CC, Yang HC, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Speckter H, Olivo J, Patel S, Cifarelli CP, Cifarelli DT, Hack JD, Strickland BA, Zada G, Chang EL, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Warnick RE, Sheehan J. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Perioptic Meningiomas: An International, Multicenter Study. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:828-837. [PMID: 33475718 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used for management of perioptic meningiomas. OBJECTIVE To study the safety and effectiveness of SRS for perioptic meningiomas. METHODS From 12 institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF), we retrospectively assessed treatment parameters and outcomes following SRS for meningiomas located within 3 mm of the optic apparatus. RESULTS A total of 438 patients (median age 51 yr) underwent SRS for histologically confirmed (29%) or radiologically suspected (71%) perioptic meningiomas. Median treatment volume was 8.01 cm3. Median prescription dose was 12 Gy, and median dose to the optic apparatus was 8.50 Gy. A total of 405 patients (93%) underwent single-fraction SRS and 33 patients (7%) underwent hypofractionated SRS. During median imaging follow-up of 55.6 mo (range: 3.15-239 mo), 33 (8%) patients experienced tumor progression. Actuarial 5-yr and 10-yr progression-free survival was 96% and 89%, respectively. Prescription dose of ≥12 Gy (HR: 0.310; 95% CI [0.141-0.679], P = .003) and single-fraction SRS (HR: 0.078; 95% CI [0.016-0.395], P = .002) were associated with improved tumor control. A total of 31 (10%) patients experienced visual decline, with actuarial 5-yr and 10-yr post-SRS visual decline rates of 9% and 21%, respectively. Maximum dose to the optic apparatus ≥10 Gy (HR = 2.370; 95% CI [1.086-5.172], P = .03) and tumor progression (HR = 4.340; 95% CI [2.070-9.097], P < .001) were independent predictors of post-SRS visual decline. CONCLUSION SRS provides durable tumor control and quite acceptable rates of vision preservation in perioptic meningiomas. Margin dose of ≥12 Gy is associated with improved tumor control, while a dose to the optic apparatus of ≥10 Gy and tumor progression are associated with post-SRS visual decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adomas Bunevicius
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Mohanad Suleiman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Neurosurgery Department, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Wael A Reda
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdelkarim
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reem M Emad
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.,Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Marco Perez Caceres
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and CEDIMAT Radiology Department, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Jeremy Olivo
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and CEDIMAT Radiology Department, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Joshua D Hack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Ben A Strickland
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kareem R Fakhoury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Akyoldaş G, Samancı Y, Yılmaz M, Şengöz M, Peker S. Long-term results of gamma knife radiosurgery for foramen magnum meningiomas. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 44:2667-2673. [PMID: 33244665 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01446-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Outcomes of 37 patients of foramen magnum meningioma (FMM) were evaluated, and the related literature was reviewed to determine the efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for treating patients with FMM. We present the largest series reported from a single institution with the longest follow-up to date. The database of patients who underwent GKRS for FMM between 2007 and 2019 was evaluated retrospectively. A total of 37 patients with radiological and pathological features consistent with FMM were included in this series. Thirty-three patients were female, and 4 were male. The median age was 58 years (range, 23-74 years). The most common symptom at diagnosis was headache (64.9%). Twelve patients had a history of microsurgical resection. The median duration from the initial onset of symptoms to GKRS was 12 months (range 1-140 months). Among the 37 tumors, eight (21.6%) were located ventrally, 24 (64.9%) laterally, and five (13.5%) dorsally. The median target volume was 3.30 cm3 (range, 0.6-17.6 cm3). Thirty-five patients (95%) were treated with single fraction GKRS, and two patients (5%) were treated with hypofractionated GKRS. The median clinical follow-up was 80 months (range, 18-151 months), while the median radiological follow-up was 84 months (range, 18-144 months). At the last clinical follow-up after GKRS, 27 patients (73%) had improved symptoms, and none had worsened pre-GKRS symptoms. At the last radiological follow-up after GKRS, 23 tumors (62.2%) remained stable, 13 (35.1%) decreased in size, and 1 (2.7%) increased in size. Tumor control, including stable and regressed tumors, was achieved in 97.3% of patients. Our cohort demonstrates that GKRS is an effective and safe treatment for patients with either primary or recurrent/residual FMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Göktuğ Akyoldaş
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Yavuz Samancı
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meltem Yılmaz
- Medical Biotechnology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meriç Şengöz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selçuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wong AK, Eddelman DB, Kramer DE, Munich SA, Byrne RW. Surgical Resection of Clinoidal Meningiomas without Routine Use of Clinoidectomy. World Neurosurg 2020; 146:e467-e472. [PMID: 33130137 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Meningiomas of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) present significant surgical challenges given their anatomic relation to critical neurovascular structures. Routine anterior clinoidectomy is often described as a critical step in the resection of these tumors to reduce recurrence and improve visual outcomes. Anterior clinoidectomy, however, is not without risk and its benefits have not been clearly delineated. We present the outcomes of our series of surgically managed ACP meningiomas in which an anterior clinoidectomy was not routinely employed. METHODS A retrospective review of all ACP meningiomas operated on between August 1997 and March 2019 was conducted. Patients with a recurrent tumor or with <6 months of follow-up were excluded. Resection was typically carried out via a frontotemporal craniotomy followed by intradural removal of the tumor. Anterior clinoidectomy was only performed if hyperostosis of the ACP caused mass effect on the optic nerve. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients were included in this study. Anterior clinoidectomy was performed in 3 patients (10.3%). Gross total resection was achieved in 22 patients (75.9%). Of the 21 patients (72.4%) who presented with visual deficits, vision improved in 18 patients (85.7%) and worsened in 2 (9.5%). Tumor recurrence occurred in 5 patients (17.2%) at a mean follow-up of 64.9 months. Perioperative morbidity was 10.3%. Permanent morbidity and mortality were 6.9% (vision deterioration) and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Resection of ACP meningiomas without routine anterior clinoidectomy minimizes potential risk while achieving gross total resection, recurrence, and visual improvement rates comparable with those in previously reported series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew K Wong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Dallas E Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Stephan A Munich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Richard W Byrne
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Surgery for Clinoidal Meningiomas: Case Series and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes and Complications. World Neurosurg 2019; 129:e700-e717. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|