Outcome prediction in brain tumor surgery: a literature review on the influence of nonmedical factors

Increased time to surgery and worse perioperative outcome in benign brain tumor patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions to healthcare systems around the world, due to both high resource utilization and concern for disease spread. Delays in non-emergent surgeries have also affected chronic disease management, including that of benign brain tumors such as meningiomas and pituitary adenomas. To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 infection on benign brain tumor resection rates and subsequent perioperative and inpatient outcomes, this study utilized the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to investigate rates of surgical resection, time to surgery, and mortality among benign brain tumor patients with and without COVID-19.

METHODS

Patient data from April 2020 to December 2020 was extracted from the NIS. Confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis was identified using the ICD-10 diagnosis code U07.1. Patients with benign neoplasms of the cerebral meninges, cranial nerves, pituitary gland, craniopharyngeal duct, and brain were included in the study. Patient socio-demographics, hospital characteristics, and clinical comorbidities were obtained. Outcome variables included rates of surgical resection, time to surgery, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

The study analysis consisted of 13,053 patients with benign intracranial neoplasms who met inclusion criteria; 597 (4.6%) patients were COVID-19 positive. Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to be older and male than COVID-19 negative patients. Patients with COVID-19 had increased overall likelihood of mortality (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.72-3.25, p < 0.0001). Even when controlling for sociodemographic/hospital factors and comorbidities, COVID-19 positive patients had a significantly longer time to surgery (8.7 days vs. 0.9 days, p < 0.0001) than COVID negative patients, and were associated with a decreased likelihood of undergoing surgery on index admission overall (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10-0.29, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

As expected, COVID-19 infection was associated with worse inpatient outcomes in effectively all measured categories, including longer time to surgery, decreased likelihood of receiving surgery on index admission, and increased likelihood of in-hospital mortality. These findings emphasize the effect that COVID-19 has on other aspects of patient care and highlight the importance of appropriate avenues of care for patients who are COVID-19 positive. Although the COVID-19 pandemic is no longer a public health emergency, understanding the pandemic's impact on outcome for these patients is essential in efficient triage and optimizing treatment for these patients in the future. Further study is needed to elucidate causal relationships on the outcomes of benign brain tumor patients.

Brain Tumor at Diagnosis: From Cognition and Behavior to Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

The present narrative review aims to discuss cognitive-emotional-behavioral symptoms in adults with brain tumors at the time of diagnosis.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched considering glioma, pituitary adenoma, and meningioma in adulthood as pathologies, together with cognitive, neuropsychological, or behavioral aspects.

RESULTS

Although a significant number of studies describe cognitive impairment after surgery or treatment in adults with brain tumors, only few focus on cognitive-emotional-behavioral symptoms at diagnosis. Furthermore, the importance of an effective communication and its impact on patients' quality of life and compliance with treatment are seldom discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with brain tumors have needs in terms of cognitive-emotional-behavioral features that are detectable at the time of diagnosis; more research is needed to identify effective communication protocols in order to allow a higher perceived quality of life in these patients.

Preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment after brain tumor surgery

PURPOSE

To identify the preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment after brain tumor surgery.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated before brain tumor surgery and after 3 months. The cognitive evaluation included MOCA for the general cognitive status, TMT for attention and executive functions, ROWL-IR and ROWL-DR for memory, and the F-A-S for verbal fluency. Anxiety, depression, social support, resilience, personality, disability, and quality of life were evaluated with the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): HADS, OSS-3, RS-14, TIPI, WHODAS-12, and EORTC-QLQ C30. Functional status was measured with KPS. Regression analyses were performed to identify preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment; PROMs and cognitive tests were compared with the normative values.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were enrolled (64 glioma; 85 meningioma). Increasing age, lower education, higher disability, and lower ROWL-DR scores were predictors of functional impairment in glioma patients while higher TMT scores and disability were predictors in meningioma patients. In multiple regression, only a worse performance in TMT remains a predictor in meningioma patients. Cognitive tests were not significantly worse than normative values, while psychosocial functioning was impaired.

CONCLUSION

TMT could be used in the preoperative evaluation and as a potential predictor in the research field on outcome predictors. Psychosocial functioning should be studied further and considered in a clinical context to identify who need major support and to plan tailored interventions.