Efficacy and safety of nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma in patients over 75 years old from multiple Japanese institutes

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in elderly patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Analysis of the NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 study

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are standard of care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma but their activity and safety in elderly patients is insufficiently explored. We evaluated outcomes of elderly patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN phase 2 trial (NCT03013335) and conducted exploratory circulating biomarker analyses.

METHODS

Patients with mRCC were treated with nivolumab after at least one antiangiogenic therapy. The main endpoint of this analysis was safety in patients ≥ 70 years old (y.o), as per the rate of treatment-related grade 3-5 events (TRAE). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival. Exploration of candidate biomarkers associated with aging included baseline circulating cytokines involved in inflammation, adhesion, immune checkpoints, angiogenesis (IL6, IL7, IL8, BAFF, CXCL13, VCAM-1, 4-1BB, VEGF).

RESULTS

Of 720 patients, 515 were < 70 y.o and 205 ≥ 70 y.o. Patients ≥ 70 y.o exhibited numerically less IMDC poor risk disease (21.0% vs 26.9%), sarcomatoid component (4.9% vs 9.8%) or brain metastases (5.9% vs. 14.7%), but more previous treatment lines (≥ 2 in 54.1% vs 48.5%). TRAE were higher in patients ≥ 70 y.o (24.9% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.033). Respective ORR (19.2% vs. 22.1%) and median PFS (4.5 versus 3.0 months, HR 0.97 [95%CI 0.81-1.15]) were similar. Overall survival was shorter in patients ≥ 70 y.o (19.3 versus 26.9 months, HR 1.26 [95%CI 1.04-1.51]), but not significantly in a competitive risk model. Only V-CAM1 and 4-1BB were found to be increased in patients ≥ 70 y.o.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab displayed higher grade 3/4 TRAE but manageable toxicity in elderly patients, with sustained activity. Elderly patients did not display specific inflammatory or angiogenic circulating profiles.

Primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) is the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Approximately 40% of patients achieve a durable response; however, 20% develop primary resistant disease (PRD) to NIVO+IPI, about which little is known in patients with mRCC. Therefore, this investigation aimed to evaluate the clinical implication of PRD in patients with mRCC to select better candidates in whom NIVO+IPI can be initiated as first-line therapy.

METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study used data collected between August 2015 and January 2023. In total, 120 patients with mRCC treated with NIVO+IPI were eligible. Associations between immune-related adverse events and progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and objective response rate were analyzed. The relationship between other clinical factors and outcomes was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The median observation period was 16 months (interquartile range, 5-27). The median age at NIVO+IPI initiation was 68 years in the male-dominant population (n = 86, 71.7%), and most patients had clear cell histology (n = 104, 86.7%). PRD was recorded in 26 (23.4%) of 111 investigated patients during NIVO+IPI therapy. Patients who experienced PRD showed worse OS (hazard ratio: 4.525, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.315-8.850, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that lymph node metastasis (LNM) (odds ratio: 4.274, 95% CI: 1.075-16.949, p = 0.039) was an independent risk factor for PRD.

CONCLUSIONS

PRD was strongly correlated with worse survival rates. LNM was independently associated with PRD in patients with mRCC receiving NIVO+IPI as first-line therapy and might indicate that a candidate will not benefit from NIVO+IPI.

Incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated cardiovascular toxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a novel class of anti-cancer therapy becoming increasingly associated with fatal cardiovascular toxicities (CVTs). The aim is to determine the incidence of CVTs in cohorts treated with ICIs as sole anti-cancer therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of scientific and medical databases was performed using PRISMA principles to identify relevant cohorts (PROSPERO registration CRD42021272470). Data for specific CVTs (pericardial disease, myocarditis, heart failure, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction/ischaemia and angina), CVT-related death and CV risk factors were extracted. Presence of CVTs in ICI-monotherapy versus combination-ICI therapy, and programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1- (PD1/PDL1-) versus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4- (CTLA4-) inhibitor groups were dichotomised and meta-analysed using random-effect models.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies (11,207 patients) were identified, from which 146 CVTs were observed (incidence 1.30%). ICI-monotherapy led to more CVTs than combination therapy (119/9009; 1.32% vs. 18/2086; 0.86%). Across monotherapies, PD1/PDL1-inhibitors had lower incidence of CVTs compared to CTLA4-inhibitors (62/6950; 0.89% vs. 57/2059; 2.77%). Based on eight studies that were meta-analysed, no significant difference was observed comparing monotherapy versus combination-ICI therapy (RR-0.69, 95% CI -1.47 to 0.09) for all CVTs, or PD1/PDL1- to CTLA4-inhibitors (RR-0.27, 95% CI -2.06 to 1.53), for all CVTs including CVT-death. CV risk factors could not be attributed to an ICI group as data was population based rather than individual based.

CONCLUSION

ICI-mediated CVTs are rare and potentially fatal. The role of CV risk factors in their development remains unclear.

Severe Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated with Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Are Associated with PDCD1 Polymorphism

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reportedly influence the effect of nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the clinical outcomes of patients with mRCC and SNPs in programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) protein-coding gene (PDCD1) and explore any potential correlation with patient prognosis and incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In total, 106 patients with mRCC, who were treated with nivolumab alone (n = 59) or nivolumab and ipilimumab (n = 47), were enrolled in the study. Three SNPs in the PDCD1 gene, namely PD-1.3, PD-1.5, and PD-1.6, were assessed. Patients harboring the PD-1.6 G allele experienced more severe (odds ratio, 3.390; 95% confidence interval 1.517–7.756; p = 0.003) and multiple (OR, 2.778; 95% CI, 1.020–6.993 p = 0.031) irAEs than those harboring the AA genotype. Thus, the existence of the PDCD1 PD-1.6 polymorphism (G allele) was associated with the occurrence of severe and multiple irAEs in patients with mRCC. Further evaluation of PDCD1 polymorphisms might help identify patients experiencing irAE by nivolumab treatment.

Real-World Experience with Nivolumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Who Have Progressed on Prior Therapies: A Single-Center Study from India

Introduction Nivolumab monotherapy is approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who have progressed on prior therapies based on the pivotal Checkmate-025 trial. There is limited literature on the efficacy and safety profile of usage of nivolumab in the treatment of mRCC in India in a real-world setting.

Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who received nivolumab monotherapy for mRCC after having progressed on prior therapies. Tumor response was graded according to RECIST v1.1 and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were documented and graded according to CTCAE v5.0.

Results Between 2016 and 2019, 35 patients received nivolumab for mRCC at our center after progression on prior therapies. A majority of the patients (n = 30, 85.7%) received it in a second-line setting, and the remaining in the third line and beyond setting. Clear cell was the most common histology (n = 26, 74.3%). There were 18 patients (51.42%) who belonged to IMDC intermediate risk, while 17 (48.58%) patients were at poor risk. The overall response rate was 60%, with complete response (CR) in 11.4%. Median duration of response was not reached among responders. Median PFS was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.06–6.93) and median OS was 26 months (95% CI: 1.90–50.09). Ongoing survival of 47, 42, 34, and 22 months was noted in four patients with CR, respectively. In our study, 23 patients (65.71%) experienced any grade of irAE. Grade 3 irAEs was seen in four patients (11.42%). Most common irAE was thyroid dysfunction seen in 12 patients (34.2%). Treatment discontinuation due to irAEs occurred in three patients (8.57%).

Conclusion Nivolumab showed good efficacy with high response rates and an OS comparable to the pivotal Checkmate-025 trial. It was well tolerated with safety profile in terms of irAE consistent with those reported in literature.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To clarify the efficacy and safety profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 149 mRCC patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy as subsequent therapy (n = 89) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy (n = 60) at 5 affiliated institutions. The patients were divided according to age: > 70 (elderly) vs. ≤ 70 years (young). Efficacy was analyzed by comparing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) between elderly and young patients. Safety was assessed by comparing the incidence rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

RESULTS

In the nivolumab monotherapy group, 34/89 patients (38%) were classified as elderly. There was no significant difference in PFS (p = 0.607), OS (p = 0.383), ORR (p = 0.0699), or DCR (p = 0.881) between elderly and young patients. In the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, 20/60 patients (33%) were classified as elderly. There was no significant difference in PFS (p = 0.995), OS (p = 0.714), ORR (p = 0.763), or DCR (p = 1.000) between the two groups. The incidence rate of irAEs was not significantly different in the nivolumab (any grade: p = 0.121; grade ≥ 3: p = 0.542) or in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab (any grade: p = 0.666; grade ≥ 3: p = 0.576) group; a higher rate of gastrointestinal irAEs was observed in elderly than in young patients (any grade 15% vs. 3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab were comparable between elderly and young patients. Thus, chronological age alone should not be a contraindication in the use of ICIs for mRCC.

Aging, cancer, and antitumor immunity

Aging leads to numerous changes that affect many components of the immune system, called "immunosenescence". Indeed, elderly individuals exhibit dysregulated immune responses against pathogens, poor responses to vaccination, and increased susceptibility to many diseases including cancer, autoimmune disorders, and other chronic inflammatory diseases. Despite progressed understanding of immunosenescence, its detailed mechanisms are still not fully understood. With advances in medicine, the population of older cancer patients is expected to rapidly increase in the coming years. Cancer immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have been shown to be effective for multiple cancer types, whereas to date, few specific data for elderly individuals have been published. Some systemic reviews have demonstrated that ICIs exhibit similar efficacy in older cancer patients, but they seem to be less effective in very old patients. In addition, toxicities might be more frequently observed in such patients. Here, we provide a summary to better understand immunosenescence and an overview of its relationship with cancer and antitumor immunity, including the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs.

Comparison of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line therapies for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study compared real-world outcomes of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

METHODS

Using the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC), we retrospectively evaluated intermediate- and poor-risk mRCC patients who were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo-Ipi), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as the first-line therapy between August 2015 and January 2020. We compared oncological outcomes between the Nivo-Ipi group and TKIs group using multivariate logistic regression analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.

RESULTS

In this study 278 patients were included. There were 52 and 226 patients in the Nivo-Ipi and TKIs groups (sunitinib 97, axitinib 118, sorafenib 9, pazopanib 2), respectively. The median age in the Nivo-Ipi and TKIs groups were 69 and 67 years, respectively. There was no significant difference in age, performance status, history of nephrectomy, and the IMDC risk group distribution between the groups. The objective response rate was significantly higher in the Nivo-Ipi group (38%) than in the TKIs group (23%, P = 0.018). The IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that a significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.60, P = 0.039) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.51, P = 0.037) rates in the Nivo-Ipi group than those in the TKIs group.

CONCLUSIONS

The oncological outcomes of patients receiving the first-line therapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in real-world practice were significantly improved in comparison with first-line TKIs therapy.