An analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of protracted infusion of low-dose 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer

Molecular Hydrogen as a Novel Antitumor Agent: Possible Mechanisms Underlying Gene Expression

While many antitumor drugs have yielded unsatisfactory therapeutic results, drugs are one of the most prevalent therapeutic measures for the treatment of cancer. The development of cancer largely results from mutations in nuclear DNA, as well as from those in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Molecular hydrogen (H₂), an inert molecule, can scavenge hydroxyl radicals (·OH), which are known to be the strongest oxidizing reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the body that causes these DNA mutations. It has been reported that H₂ has no side effects, unlike conventional antitumor drugs, and that it is effective against many diseases caused by oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. Recently, there has been an increasing number of papers on the efficacy of H₂ against cancer and its effects in mitigating the side effects of cancer treatment. In this review, we demonstrate the efficacy and safety of H₂ as a novel antitumor agent and show that its mechanisms may not only involve the direct scavenging of ·OH, but also other indirect biological defense mechanisms via the regulation of gene expression.

Retrospective Cohort Study of Intraoperative Administration of Sustained-Release 5-Fluorouracil Implants in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients

Background: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is basically used in the field of postoperative chemotherapy of gastric cancer (GC), the goal of this study was to evaluate improvement of long-term survival rate among GC patients after the 5-FU implants treatment.

Methods: The study included 145 patients with gastric cancer who received postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU implants and had complete follow-up information. According to the sex, age and clinical stage of 5-FU implants group, 74 patients were matched as the control group at the same time. In the study, we compared the 5-year overall survival rate with progression-free survival rate in the two groups, and the drug safety for both groups during the treatment was also compared.

Results: The median follow-up time was 85 months (range 60–116 months). 31 patients (21.38%) died of tumor recurrence in 5-FU implants group and 21 (28.38%) in control group. In the control group, metastatic lesions were found in the small intestine, left adrenal gland and peritoneum in three patients. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 79.71% in 5-FU group and 67.12% in control (p = 0.0045). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 77.68% in 5-FU implants group and 64.87% in control (p = 0.0159). Both the 5-years OS and PFS rates in 5-FU group were better than control group without significant side effect.

Conclusions: 5-FU implants may improve 5-years OS and PFS rates after surgery in gastric cancer patients, while good safety profile suggests it could be reliable.

Synergistic anticancer effect of curcumin and chemotherapy regimen FP in human gastric cancer MGC-803 cells

Curcumin is an anticancer compound that exerts anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects via multiple molecular targets. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the anticancer effects of curcumin in combination with 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP) on the MGC-803 human gastric cancer cell line. Following treatment with curcumin and/or FP for 24, 48 and 72 h, cell viability, cell cycle progression and the apoptosis rate were evaluated using an MTT assay, flow cytometry and dual acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining, respectively. In addition, colony formation, Transwell migration and caspase-3/caspase-8 activity assays were performed. The expression of the apoptosis regulator B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) and Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) were detected by western blotting analysis. Following treatment with curcumin and/or FP, cell viability, colony formation and cell migration were significantly reduced compared with the untreated control group. The rate of apoptosis, caspase-3/caspase-8 activity and the expression of Bax were significantly increased, whereas Bcl-2 expression was significantly reduced following treatment with curcumin and/or FP, compared with the untreated control group. The efficacy of curcumin combined with low-dose FP was significantly increased, compared with that of curcumin combined with high-dose FP (P<0.05). Therefore, curcumin may enhance the anticancer effects of FP chemotherapy in MGC-803 cells through the promotion of apoptosis via the caspase-3/caspase-8, Bcl-2 and Bax signaling pathways. These results suggest that curcumin may serve as a synergistic drug with chemotherapy regimen FP for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Fluorouracil plasma monitoring: systematic review and economic evaluation of the My5-FU assay for guiding dose adjustment in patients receiving fluorouracil chemotherapy by continuous infusion

BACKGROUND

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapy used in colorectal, head and neck (H&N) and other cancers. Dose adjustment is based on body surface area (BSA) but wide variations occur. Pharmacokinetic (PK) dosing is suggested to bring plasma levels into the therapeutic range to promote fewer side effects and better patient outcomes. We investigated the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the My5-FU assay for PK dose adjustment to 5-FU therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the evidence on the accuracy of the My5-FU assay compared with gold standard methods [high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)]; the effectiveness of My5-FU PK dosing compared with BSA; the effectiveness of HPLC and/or LC-MS compared with BSA; the generalisability of published My5-FU and PK studies; costs of using My5-FU; to develop a cost-effectiveness model.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and other databases between January and April 2014.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts with arbitration and consensus agreement. We undertook quality assessment. We reconstructed Kaplan-Meier plots for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for comparison of BSA and PK dosing. We developed a Markov model to compare My5-FU with BSA dosing which modelled PFS, OS and adverse events, using a 2-week cycle over a 20 year time horizon with a 3.5% discount rate. Health impacts were evaluated from the patient perspective, while costs were evaluated from the NHS and Personal Social Services perspective.

RESULTS

A total of 8341 records were identified through electronic searches and 35 and 54 studies were included in the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness reviews respectively. There was a high apparent correlation between My5-FU, HPLC and LC-MS/mass spectrometer but upper and lower limits of agreement were -18% to 30%. Median OS were estimated as 19.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.0 to 21.0] months for PK versus 14.6 (95% CI 14.1 to 15.3) months for BSA for 5-FU+folinic acid (FA); and 27.4 (95% CI 23.2 to 38.8) months for PK versus 20.6 (95% CI 18.4 to 22.9) months for BSA for FOLFOX6 in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PK versus BSA studies were generalisable to the relevant populations. We developed cost-effectiveness models for mCRC and H&N cancer. The base case assumed a cost per My5-FU assay of £ 61.03. For mCRC for 12 cycles of a oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and FA (FOLFOX) regimen, there was a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain of 0.599 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £ 4148 per QALY. Probabilistic and scenario analyses gave similar results. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed My5-FU to be 100% cost-effective at a threshold of £ 20,000 per QALY. For H&N cancer, again, given caveats about the poor evidence base, we also estimated that My5-FU is likely to be cost-effective at a threshold of £ 20,000 per QALY.

LIMITATIONS

Quality and quantity of evidence were very weak for PK versus BSA dosing for all cancers with no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using current regimens. For H&N cancer, two studies of regimens no longer in use were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a linked evidence approach, My5-FU appears to be cost-effective at a willingness to pay of £ 20,000 per QALY for both mCRC and H&N cancer. Considerable uncertainties remain about evidence quality and practical implementation. RCTs are needed of PK versus BSA dosing in relevant cancers.

Impact of chemotherapy on quality of life in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a key issue in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer, a disease associated with survival times rarely exceeding 10 months. The objective of the current review was to evaluate the effects of chemotherapy on the HRQoL of patients with metastatic or locally advanced, inoperable esophagogastric cancer.

METHODS

A systematic MEDLINE search was performed to address a predefined question list: Does chemotherapy improve or maintain HRQoL? Do available data favor a particular chemotherapy? What relation exists between HRQoL and the efficacy and tolerability of therapy?

RESULTS

The majority of studies, including large randomized studies, indicated no significant improvements in mean HRQoL scores versus baseline after chemotherapy. However, scores were maintained and symptomatic relief or improved performance status was observed in many patients. HRQoL was maintained in approximately 50% of patients for up to 6 months but deteriorated in the remaining patients. In randomized phase 3 trials, only cisplatin/fluorouracil plus either docetaxel or epirubicin were found to provide superior HRQoL versus comparators. Between-regimen differences in HRQoL scores appeared to correspond to differences in the efficacy rather than the toxicity of treatment regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy maintained HRQoL in a substantial proportion of patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. This effect appeared to correspond to the efficacy of the treatment.

Phase II Study of S-1 Monotherapy as a First-line, Combination Therapy of S-1 plus Cisplatin as a Second-line, and Weekly Paclitaxel Monotherapy as a Third-line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: Phase II Study of S-1, S-1 plus Cisplatin, and Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients with Advanced Gastric Carcinoma

Background

We conducted a pilot phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 as a first-line, S-1 plus cisplatin as a second-line, and weekly paclitaxel as a third-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Patients and methods

Between 2002 and 2005, 19 patients were enrolled in this study. Chemotherapy consisted of either 60 mg/m² of S-1 for 4 weeks at 6 weeks interval, a combination of 60 mg/m² S-1 for 3 weeks and 60 mg/m² cisplatin on day 8 at 5 weeks interval, or 60 mg/m² paclitaxel at day 1, 8, 15, at 4 weeks interval. The regimen was repeated until the occurrence of unacceptable toxicities, disease progression, or patient refusal. The primary end point was the overall survival.

Results

The response rates were 33.3%, 12.5%, and 0% after the first, second, and third line chemotherapy, respectively. The mean overall survival time was 994 days. The median survival time could not be calculated because 12 out of 19 patients were still alive when the study was concluded. Regarding hematological toxicity, the major adverse effect was leukopenia, which reached grades 3–4 in all lines of chemotherapy investigated. In addition, regarding non-hematological toxicities, the major adverse effect was anorexia, which reached grade 3–4 in the second line chemotherapy, and no deaths were attributable to the adverse effects of the drugs.

Conclusion

This sequential therapy was an effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer with acceptable toxic side-effects. We considered this sequential therapy to be effective because of the smooth switch to the next regimen.

Phase I study of cisplatin and irinotecan combined with concurrent hyperfractionated accelerated thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan, when combined with cisplatin, is an effective treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This constitutes a rationale for conducting a phase I study of chemoradiotherapy including this combination for locally advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced NSCLC and a performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible. The protocol consisted of escalating doses of irinotecan on days 1 and 15, and daily low-dose cisplatin (6 mg/m(2) daily for a total dose of 120 mg/m(2)) combined with concurrent hyperfractionated accelerated thoracic irradiation (1.5 Gy twice daily for a total dose of 60 Gy).

RESULTS

The maximum tolerable dose was 50 mg/m(2) of irinotecan, and the dose-limiting toxicity was esophagitis. Tumor response was observed in 50% of cases, and the median survival time of the 12 patients enrolled was 10.1 months, including two patients with 5-year disease-free survival. A pharmacokinetics study demonstrated an accumulation of total platinum, but not of free platinum, during the 26-day treatment period.

CONCLUSION

The recommended dose for phase II studies was determined.

Immunotherapy and chemotherapy--a practical partnership

This article discusses how recent data have altered the way we understand how dying tumour cells, particularly those killed by chemotherapy, engage with antitumour immune responses. These data have significant implications for the development of new protocols combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy, indicating an exciting potential for therapeutic synergy with general applicability to many cancer types.

Norcantharidin-induced apoptosis in oral cancer cells is associated with an increase of proapoptotic to antiapoptotic protein ratio

Norcantharidin (NCTD), the demethylated analogue of cantharidin, has been used to treat human cancers in China since 1984. It was recently found to be capable of inducing apoptosis in human colon carcinoma, hepatoma and glioblastoma cells by way of an elusive mechanism. In this study, we demonstrated that NCTD also induces apoptosis in human oral cancer cell lines SAS (p53 wild-type phenotype) and Ca9-22 (p53 mutant) as evidenced by nuclear condensation, TUNEL labeling, DNA fragmentation and cleavage of PARP. Apoptosis induced by NCTD was both dose- and time-dependent. We found NCTD did not induce Fas and FasL, implying that it activated other apoptosis pathways. Our data showed that NCTD caused accumulation of cytosolic cytochrome c and activation of caspase-9, suggesting that apoptosis occurred via the mitochondria mediated pathway. NCTD enhanced the expression of Bax in SAS cells consistent with their p53 status. Moreover, we showed that NCTD downregulated the expression of Bcl-2 in Ca9-22 and Bcl-XL in SAS. Our results suggest that NCTD-induced apoptosis in oral cancer cells may be mediated by an increase in the ratios of proapoptotic to antiapoptotic proteins. Since oral cancer cells with mutant p53 or elevated Bcl-XL levels showed resistance to multiple chemotherapeutic agents, NCTD may overcome the chemoresistance of these cells and provide potential new avenues for treatment.

Future prospects of personalized chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients: results of a prospective randomized pilot study

In the present study, in order to evaluate the feasibility of personalized chemotherapy, a prospective randomized pilot study was performed in 30 advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients. As we have demonstrated previously, the expressions of mRNA from tumor biopsy samples for seven molecular markers, i.e., dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), glutathione S-transferase (GST)-pi, beta-tubulin (tub), O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), multiple drug-resistant protein (MRP)-1, NADPH/quinone oxidoreductase (NQO)-1, and cytochrome p450 (P450), were examined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis and therapy was recommended in a flow chart that depended on the level of expression of these predictive molecular markers. We chose 12 therapeutic plans, including best supportive care (BSC). We treated 15 patients according to the gene expression profiles, and the remaining 15 patients (controls) were treated without recommended regimens, and the therapy was continued after the expression profiles were checked. Interestingly, 11 of 26 lesions (42.3%) responded after treatment given according to gene expression analysis; however, no clinical response was detected in the control group. The prediction of the response, including resistance, was successful in 75.9% by the gene expression profiles. Moreover, the survival of the patients with the recommended treatment was better than that of patients without a recommended protocol. These results indicate that personalized treatment may be beneficial for gastric cancer chemotherapy and further randomized trials should be carried out in the future.