Development of prognostic model for patients at CKD stage 3a and 3b in South Central China using computational intelligence

Association of peripheral eosinophil count with chronic kidney disease progression risk: a retrospective cohort study in Chinese population

BACKGROUND

The role of peripheral eosinophils in chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires further evaluation. We aimed to determine whether an eosinophil count increase is related to the occurrence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

METHODS

This single-center, observational, retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2016 and December 2018 in Hangzhou, China, and included 3163 patients, categorized into four groups according to peripheral eosinophil count (PEC) quartile values. The main outcome was ESRD development during follow-up. We evaluated the relationship between the serum eosinophil count, demographic and clinical information, and ESRD incidence. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used.

RESULTS

A total of 3163 patients with CKD were included in this cohort, of whom 1254 (39.6%) were females. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 75 [64, 85] years, and the median (IQR) estimated glomerular filtration rate was 55.16 [45.19, 61.19] mL/min/1.73 m2. The median PEC was 0.1224 × 109/L (IQR, 0.0625-0.212). Among the 3163 patients with CKD, 273 (8.6%) developed ESRD during a median follow-up time of 443.8 [238.8, 764.9] days. Individuals in the highest PEC quartile had a 66.2% higher ESRD risk than those in the lowest quartile (hazard ratio, 1.662; 95% confidence interval, 1.165-2.372). The results from the Kaplan-Meier survival curves confirmed the conclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Alongside traditional risk factors, patients with CKD and an elevated PEC are more likely to develop ESRD. Therefore, more attention should be paid to those patients with CKD who have a high PEC.

Representation of multimorbidity and frailty in the development and validation of kidney failure prognostic prediction models: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Prognostic models that identify individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at greatest risk of developing kidney failure help clinicians to make decisions and deliver precision medicine. It is recognised that people with CKD usually have multiple long-term health conditions (multimorbidity) and often experience frailty. We undertook a systematic review to evaluate the representation and consideration of multimorbidity and frailty within CKD cohorts used to develop and/or validate prognostic models assessing the risk of kidney failure.

METHODS

We identified studies that described derivation, validation or update of kidney failure prognostic models in MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus and the Cochrane Library-CENTRAL. The primary outcome was representation of multimorbidity or frailty. The secondary outcome was predictive accuracy of identified models in relation to presence of multimorbidity or frailty.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven studies reporting 121 different kidney failure prognostic models were identified. Two studies reported prevalence of multimorbidity and a single study reported prevalence of frailty. The rates of specific comorbidities were reported in a greater proportion of studies: 67.0% reported baseline data on diabetes, 54.6% reported hypertension and 39.2% reported cardiovascular disease. No studies included frailty in model development, and only one study considered multimorbidity as a predictor variable. No studies assessed model performance in populations in relation to multimorbidity. A single study assessed associations between frailty and the risks of kidney failure and death.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of kidney failure risk prediction models that consider the impact of multimorbidity and/or frailty, resulting in a lack of clear evidence-based practice for multimorbid or frail individuals. These knowledge gaps should be explored to help clinicians know whether these models can be used for CKD patients who experience multimorbidity and/or frailty.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022347295).

Machine learning models to predict end-stage kidney disease in chronic kidney disease stage 4

INTRODUCTION

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Identifying patients with stage 4 CKD (CKD4) at risk of rapid progression to ESKD remains challenging. Accurate prediction of CKD4 progression can improve patient outcomes by improving advanced care planning and optimizing healthcare resource allocation.

METHODS

We obtained electronic health record data from patients with CKD4 in a large health system between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016. We developed and validated four models, including Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and artificial neural network (ANN), to predict ESKD at 3 years. We utilized area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to evaluate model performances and utilized Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values and plots to define feature dependence of the best performance model.

RESULTS

We included 3,160 patients with CKD4. ESKD was observed in 538 patients (21%). All approaches had similar AUROCs; ANN yielded the highest AUROC (0.77; 95%CI 0.75 to 0.79) and LASSO regression (0.77; 95%CI 0.75 to 0.79), followed by random forest (0.76; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.79), and XGBoost (0.76; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated several models for near-term prediction of kidney failure in CKD4. ANN, random forest, and XGBoost demonstrated similar predictive performances. Using this suite of models, interventions can be customized based on risk, and population health and resources appropriately allocated.

Risk prediction of the progression of chronic kidney disease stage 1 based on peripheral blood samples: construction and internal validation of a nomogram

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have high morbidity and mortality, and the disease progression has a significant impact on their survival and living standards. This research aims to analyze risk factors for CKD stage 1 and provide a reference for clinical decision making. The clinical data and peripheral blood samples of 300 patients with CKD stage 1 were collected retrospectively. Patients were randomly assigned into a training set (n = 210) and a validation set (n = 90). Patients' baseline characteristic levels were subjected to statistical tests for difference. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized to identify risk factors influencing disease progression. Subsequently, a prediction model for disease progression was developed using a nomogram, and the model's accuracy was assessed using the C-index and calibration curve. The results revealed that hypertension, diabetes, and urinary albumin were essential factors in the progression of CKD stage 1. The nomogram was constructed and then the C-index was calculated. The calibration curve was utilized to assess the risk model. The C-index of the training set was 0.75, and the C-index of the validation set was 0.73, suggesting a good predictive ability of the model. The risk model accurately predicted the progression of CKD stage 1, which is of great significance to developing personalized treatment for patients in clinical practice.

Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

In this systematic review we aimed at assessing how artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) techniques have been deployed to predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease (CKD). We systematically reviewed the available evidence on these innovative techniques to improve CKD diagnosis and patient management.

METHODS

We included English language studies retrieved from PubMed. The review is therefore to be classified as a "rapid review", since it includes one database only, and has language restrictions; the novelty and importance of the issue make missing relevant papers unlikely. We extracted 16 variables, including: main aim, studied population, data source, sample size, problem type (regression, classification), predictors used, and performance metrics. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) approach; all main steps were done in duplicate.

RESULTS

From a total of 648 studies initially retrieved, 68 articles met the inclusion criteria. Models, as reported by authors, performed well, but the reported metrics were not homogeneous across articles and therefore direct comparison was not feasible. The most common aim was prediction of prognosis, followed by diagnosis of CKD. Algorithm generalizability, and testing on diverse populations was rarely taken into account. Furthermore, the clinical evaluation and validation of the models/algorithms was perused; only a fraction of the included studies, 6 out of 68, were performed in a clinical context.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning is a promising tool for the prediction of risk, diagnosis, and therapy management for CKD patients. Nonetheless, future work is needed to address the interpretability, generalizability, and fairness of the models to ensure the safe application of such technologies in routine clinical practice.

Machine learning algorithms' accuracy in predicting kidney disease progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Kidney disease progression rates vary among patients. Rapid and accurate prediction of kidney disease outcomes is crucial for disease management. In recent years, various prediction models using Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been established in nephrology. However, their accuracy have been inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of ML algorithms for kidney disease progression.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and the VIP Database for diagnostic studies on ML algorithms' accuracy in predicting kidney disease prognosis, from the establishment of these databases until October 2020. Two investigators independently evaluate study quality by QUADAS-2 tool and extracted data from single ML algorithm for data synthesis using the bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were left after screening, only 6 studies were eligible for data synthesis. The sample size of these 6 studies was 12,534, and the kidney disease types could be divided into chronic kidney disease (CKD) and Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy, with 5 articles using end-stage renal diseases occurrence as the primary outcome. The main results indicated that the area under curve (AUC) of the HSROC was 0.87 (0.84-0.90) and ML algorithm exhibited a strong specificity, 95% confidence interval and heterogeneity (I2) of (0.87, 0.84-0.90, [I2 99.0%]) and a weak sensitivity of (0.68, 0.58-0.77, [I2 99.7%]) in predicting kidney disease deterioration. And the the results of subgroup analysis indicated that ML algorithm's AUC for predicting CKD prognosis was 0.82 (0.79-0.85), with the pool sensitivity of (0.64, 0.49-0.77, [I2 99.20%]) and pool specificity of (0.84, 0.74-0.91, [I2 99.84%]). The ML algorithm's AUC for predicting IgA nephropathy prognosis was 0.78 (0.74-0.81), with the pool sensitivity of (0.74, 0.71-0.77, [I2 7.10%]) and pool specificity of (0.93, 0.91-0.95, [I2 83.92%]).

CONCLUSION

Taking advantage of big data, ML algorithm-based prediction models have high accuracy in predicting kidney disease progression, we recommend ML algorithms as an auxiliary tool for clinicians to determine proper treatment and disease management strategies.