1
|
Creff G, Lambert C, Coudert P, Pean V, Laurent S, Godey B. Comparison of Tonotopic and Default Frequency Fitting for Speech Understanding in Noise in New Cochlear Implantees: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study. Ear Hear 2024; 45:35-52. [PMID: 37823850 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES While cochlear implants (CIs) have provided benefits for speech recognition in quiet for subjects with severe-to-profound hearing loss, speech recognition in noise remains challenging. A body of evidence suggests that reducing frequency-to-place mismatch may positively affect speech perception. Thus, a fitting method based on a tonotopic map may improve speech perception results in quiet and noise. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of a tonotopic map on speech perception in noise and quiet in new CI users. DESIGN A prospective, randomized, double-blind, two-period cross-over study in 26 new CI users was performed over a 6-month period. New CI users older than 18 years with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss or complete hearing loss for less than 5 years were selected in the University Hospital Centre of Rennes in France. An anatomical tonotopic map was created using postoperative flat-panel computed tomography and a reconstruction software based on the Greenwood function. Each participant was randomized to receive a conventional map followed by a tonotopic map or vice versa. Each setting was maintained for 6 weeks, at the end of which participants performed speech perception tasks. The primary outcome measure was speech recognition in noise. Participants were allocated to sequences by block randomization of size two with a ratio 1:1 (CONSORT Guidelines). Participants and those assessing the outcomes were blinded to the intervention. RESULTS Thirteen participants were randomized to each sequence. Two of the 26 participants recruited (one in each sequence) had to be excluded due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Twenty-four participants were analyzed. Speech recognition in noise was significantly better with the tonotopic fitting at all signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels tested [SNR = +9 dB, p = 0.002, mean effect (ME) = 12.1%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 4.9 to 19.2, standardized effect size (SES) = 0.71; SNR = +6 dB, p < 0.001, ME = 16.3%, 95% CI = 9.8 to 22.7, SES = 1.07; SNR = +3 dB, p < 0.001 ME = 13.8%, 95% CI = 6.9 to 20.6, SES = 0.84; SNR = 0 dB, p = 0.003, ME = 10.8%, 95% CI = 4.1 to 17.6, SES = 0.68]. Neither period nor interaction effects were observed for any signal level. Speech recognition in quiet ( p = 0.66) and tonal audiometry ( p = 0.203) did not significantly differ between the two settings. 92% of the participants kept the tonotopy-based map after the study period. No correlation was found between speech-in-noise perception and age, duration of hearing deprivation, angular insertion depth, or position or width of the frequency filters allocated to the electrodes. CONCLUSION For new CI users, tonotopic fitting appears to be more efficient than the default frequency fitting because it allows for better speech recognition in noise without compromising understanding in quiet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwenaelle Creff
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (HNS), University Hospital, Rennes, France
- MediCIS, LTSI (Image and Signal Processing Laboratory), INSERM, U1099, Rennes, France
| | - Cassandre Lambert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (HNS), University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Paul Coudert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (HNS), University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Benoit Godey
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (HNS), University Hospital, Rennes, France
- MediCIS, LTSI (Image and Signal Processing Laboratory), INSERM, U1099, Rennes, France
- Hearing Aid Academy, Javene, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dillon MT, Helpard L, Brown KD, Selleck AM, Richter ME, Rooth MA, Thompson NJ, Dedmon MM, Ladak HM, Agrawal S. Influence of the Frequency-to-Place Function on Recognition with Place-Based Cochlear Implant Maps. Laryngoscope 2023; 133:3540-3547. [PMID: 37078508 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Comparison of acute speech recognition for cochlear implant (CI) alone and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users listening with default maps or place-based maps using either a spiral ganglion (SG) or a new Synchrotron Radiation-Artificial Intelligence (SR-AI) frequency-to-place function. METHODS Thirteen adult CI-alone or EAS users completed a task of speech recognition at initial device activation with maps that differed in the electric filter frequency assignments. The three map conditions were: (1) maps with the default filter settings (default map), (2) place-based maps with filters aligned to cochlear SG tonotopicity using the SG function (SG place-based map), and (3) place-based maps with filters aligned to cochlear Organ of Corti (OC) tonotopicity using the SR-AI function (SR-AI place-based map). Speech recognition was evaluated using a vowel recognition task. Performance was scored as the percent correct for formant 1 recognition due to the rationale that the maps would deviate the most in the estimated cochlear place frequency for low frequencies. RESULTS On average, participants had better performance with the OC SR-AI place-based map as compared to the SG place-based map and the default map. A larger performance benefit was observed for EAS users than for CI-alone users. CONCLUSION These pilot data suggest that EAS and CI-alone users may experience better performance with a patient-centered mapping approach that accounts for the variability in cochlear morphology (OC SR-AI frequency-to-place function) in the individualization of the electric filter frequencies (place-based mapping procedure). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3540-3547, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Luke Helpard
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - A Morgan Selleck
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Margaret E Richter
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Meredith A Rooth
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nicholas J Thompson
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew M Dedmon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hanif M Ladak
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dillon MT, Buss E, Johnson AD, Canfarotta MW, O’Connell BP. Comparison of Two Place-Based Mapping Procedures on Masked Sentence Recognition as a Function of Electrode Array Angular Insertion Depth and Presence of Acoustic Low-Frequency Information: A Simulation Study. Audiol Neurootol 2023; 28:478-487. [PMID: 37482054 PMCID: PMC10948008 DOI: 10.1159/000531262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cochlear implant (CI) and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users may experience better performance with maps that align the electric filter frequencies to the cochlear place frequencies, known as place-based maps, than with maps that present spectrally shifted information. Individual place-based mapping procedures differ in the frequency content that is aligned to cochlear tonotopicity versus discarded or spectrally shifted. The performance benefit with different place-based maps may vary due to individual differences in angular insertion depth (AID) of the electrode array and whether functional acoustic low-frequency information is available in the implanted ear. The present study compared masked speech recognition with two types of place-based maps as a function of AID and presence of acoustic low-frequency information. METHODS Sixty adults with normal hearing listened acutely to CI or EAS simulations of two types of place-based maps for one of three cases of electrode arrays at shallow AIDs. The strict place-based (Strict-PB) map aligned the low- and mid-frequency information to cochlear tonotopicity and discarded information below the frequency associated with the most apical electrode contact. The alternative place-based map (LFshift-PB) aligned the mid-frequency information to cochlear tonotopicity and provided more of the speech spectrum by compressing low-frequency information on the apical electrode contacts (i.e., <1 kHz). Three actual cases of a 12-channel, 24-mm electrode array were simulated by assigning the carrier frequency for an individual channel as the cochlear place frequency of the associated electrode contact. The AID and cochlear place frequency for the most apical electrode contact were 460° and 498 Hz for case 1, 389° and 728 Hz for case 2, and 335° and 987 Hz for case 3, respectively. RESULTS Generally, better performance was observed with the Strict-PB maps for cases 1 and 2, where mismatches were 2-4 octaves for the most apical channel with the LFshift-PB map. Similar performance was observed between maps for case 3. For the CI simulations, performance with the Strict-PB map declined with decreases in AID, while performance with the LFshift-PB map remained stable across cases. For the EAS simulations, performance with the Strict-PB map remained stable across cases, while performance with the LFshift-PB map improved with decreases in AID. CONCLUSIONS Listeners demonstrated differences with the Strict-PB versus LFshift-PB maps as a function of AID and whether acoustic low-frequency information was available (CI vs. EAS). These data support the use of the Strict-PB mapping procedure for AIDs ≥335°, though further study including time for acclimatization in CI and EAS users is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret T. Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alec D. Johnson
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michael W. Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Brendan P. O’Connell
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Charlotte Eye Ear Nose & Throat Associates, P.A., Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weller T, Timm ME, Lenarz T, Büchner A. Cochlear coverage with lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays affects post-operative speech recognition. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287450. [PMID: 37437046 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The goal was to investigate the relationship between the insertion angle/cochlear coverage of cochlear implant electrode arrays and post-operative speech recognition scores in a large cohort of patients implanted with lateral wall electrode arrays. METHODS Pre- and post-operative cone beam computed tomography scans of 154 ears implanted with lateral wall electrode arrays were evaluated. Traces of lateral wall and electrode arrays were combined into a virtual reconstruction of the implanted cochlea. This reconstruction was used to measure insertion angles and proportional cochlear coverage. Word recognition scores and sentence recognition scores measured 12 months after implantation using electric-only stimulation were used to examine the relationship between cochlear coverage/insertion angle and implantation outcomes. RESULTS Post-operative word recognition scores and the difference between post- and pre-operative word recognition scores were positively correlated with both cochlear coverage and insertion angle, however sentence recognition scores were not. A group-wise comparison of word recognition scores revealed that patients with cochlear coverage below 70% performed significantly worse than patients with coverage between 79%-82% (p = 0.003). Performance of patients with coverage above 82% was on average poorer than between 79%-82, although this finding was not statistically significant (p = 0.84). Dividing the cohort into groups based on insertion angle quadrants revealed that word recognition scores were highest above 450° insertion angle, sentence recognition scores were highest between 450° and 630° and the difference between pre- and post-operative word recognition scores was largest between 540° and 630°, however none of these differences reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study show that cochlear coverage has an effect on post-operative word recognition abilities and the benefit patients receive from their implant. Generally, higher coverage led to better outcomes, however there were results indicating that insertion past 82% cochlear coverage may not provide an additional benefit for word recognition. These findings can be useful for choosing the optimal electrode array and thereby improving cochlear implantation outcomes on a patient-individual basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Weller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- German Hearing Center (DHZ), Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All", Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Max Eike Timm
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- German Hearing Center (DHZ), Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All", Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- German Hearing Center (DHZ), Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All", Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thomas M, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ. Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users. Sci Rep 2023; 13:4960. [PMID: 36973380 PMCID: PMC10042848 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32135-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractBimodal cochlear implant (CI) listeners have difficulty utilizing spatial cues to segregate competing speech, possibly due to tonotopic mismatch between the acoustic input frequency and electrode place of stimulation. The present study investigated the effects of tonotopic mismatch in the context of residual acoustic hearing in the non-CI ear or residual hearing in both ears. Speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) were measured with two co-located or spatially separated speech maskers in normal-hearing adults listening to acoustic simulations of CIs; low frequency acoustic information was available in the non-CI ear (bimodal listening) or in both ears. Bimodal SRTs were significantly better with tonotopically matched than mismatched electric hearing for both co-located and spatially separated speech maskers. When there was no tonotopic mismatch, residual acoustic hearing in both ears provided a significant benefit when maskers were spatially separated, but not when co-located. The simulation data suggest that hearing preservation in the implanted ear for bimodal CI listeners may significantly benefit utilization of spatial cues to segregate competing speech, especially when the residual acoustic hearing is comparable across two ears. Also, the benefits of bilateral residual acoustic hearing may be best ascertained for spatially separated maskers.
Collapse
|
6
|
Dillon MT, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, Rooth MA, Richter ME, Overton AB, Roth NE, Dillon SM, Raymond JH, Young A, Pearson AC, Davis AG, Dedmon MM, Brown KD, O'Connell BP. Influence of Electric Frequency-to-Place Mismatches on the Early Speech Recognition Outcomes for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users. Am J Audiol 2023; 32:251-260. [PMID: 36800505 PMCID: PMC10166189 DOI: 10.1044/2022_aja-21-00254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with hearing preservation experience significant improvements in speech recognition with electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) as compared to with a CI alone, although outcomes across EAS users vary. The individual differences in performance may be due in part to default mapping procedures, which result in electric frequency-to-place mismatches for the majority of EAS users. This study assessed the influence of electric mismatches on the early speech recognition for EAS users. METHOD Twenty-one participants were randomized at EAS activation to listen exclusively with a default or place-based map. For both groups, the unaided thresholds determined the acoustic cutoff frequency (i.e., > 65 dB HL). For default maps, the electric filter frequencies were assigned to avoid spectral gaps in frequency information but created varying magnitudes of mismatches. For place-based maps, the electric filter frequencies were assigned to avoid frequency-to-place mismatches. Recognition of consonant-nucleus-consonant words and vowels was assessed at activation and 1, 3, and 6 months postactivation. RESULTS For participants with default maps, electric mismatch at 1500 Hz ranged from 2 to -12.0 semitones (Mdn = -5 semitones). Poorer performance was observed for those with larger magnitudes of electric mismatch. This effect was observed through 6 months of EAS listening experience. CONCLUSIONS The present sample of EAS users experienced better initial performance when electric mismatches were small or eliminated. These data suggest the utility of methods that reduce electric mismatches, such as place-based mapping procedures. Investigation is ongoing to determine whether these differences persist with long-term EAS use. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22096523.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret T. Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Michael W. Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Meredith A. Rooth
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Margaret E. Richter
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | | | | | | | | | - Allison Young
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Amanda G. Davis
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Matthew M. Dedmon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Kevin D. Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Brendan P. O'Connell
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Image-Guided Cochlear Implant Programming: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e924-e935. [PMID: 35973035 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review studies evaluating clinically implemented image-guided cochlear implant programing (IGCIP) and to determine its effect on cochlear implant (CI) performance. DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for English language publications from inception to August 1, 2021. STUDY SELECTION Included studies prospectively compared intraindividual CI performance between an image-guided experimental map and a patient's preferred traditional map. Non-English studies, cadaveric studies, and studies where imaging did not directly inform programming were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Seven studies were identified for review, and five reported comparable components of audiological testing and follow-up times appropriate for meta-analysis. Demographic, speech, spectral modulation, pitch accuracy, and quality-of-life survey data were collected. Aggregate data were used when individual data were unavailable. DATA SYNTHESIS Audiological test outcomes were evaluated as standardized mean change (95% confidence interval) using random-effects meta-analysis with raw score standardization. Improvements in speech and quality-of-life measures using the IGCIP map demonstrated nominal effect sizes: consonant-nucleus-consonant words, 0.15 (-0.12 to 0.42); AzBio quiet, 0.09 (-0.05 to 0.22); AzBio +10 dB signal-noise ratio, 0.14 (-0.01 to 0.30); Bamford-Kowel-Bench sentence in noise, -0.11 (-0.35 to 0.12); Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, -0.14 (-0.28 to 0.00); and Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale, 0.13 (-0.02 to 0.28). Nevertheless, 79% of patients allowed to keep their IGCIP map opted for continued use after the investigational period. CONCLUSION IGCIP has potential to precisely guide CI programming. Nominal effect sizes for objective outcome measures fail to reflect subjective benefits fully given discordance with the percentage of patients who prefer to maintain their IGCIP map.
Collapse
|
8
|
Dillon MT, O'Connell BP, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, Hopfinger J. Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Am J Audiol 2022; 31:322-337. [PMID: 35394798 DOI: 10.1044/2022_aja-21-00123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cochlear implant (CI) recipients demonstrate variable speech recognition when listening with a CI-alone or electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device, which may be due in part to electric frequency-to-place mismatches created by the default mapping procedures. Performance may be improved if the filter frequencies are aligned with the cochlear place frequencies, known as place-based mapping. Performance with default maps versus an experimental place-based map was compared for participants with normal hearing when listening to CI-alone or EAS simulations to observe potential outcomes prior to initiating an investigation with CI recipients. METHOD A noise vocoder simulated CI-alone and EAS devices, mapped with default or place-based procedures. The simulations were based on an actual 24-mm electrode array recipient, whose insertion angles for each electrode contact were used to estimate the respective cochlear place frequency. The default maps used the filter frequencies assigned by the clinical software. The filter frequencies for the place-based maps aligned with the cochlear place frequencies for individual contacts in the low- to mid-frequency cochlear region. For the EAS simulations, low-frequency acoustic information was filtered to simulate aided low-frequency audibility. Performance was evaluated for the AzBio sentences presented in a 10-talker masker at +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), +10 dB SNR, and asymptote. RESULTS Performance was better with the place-based maps as compared with the default maps for both CI-alone and EAS simulations. For instance, median performance at +10 dB SNR for the CI-alone simulation was 57% correct for the place-based map and 20% for the default map. For the EAS simulation, those values were 59% and 37% correct. Adding acoustic low-frequency information resulted in a similar benefit for both maps. CONCLUSIONS Reducing frequency-to-place mismatches, such as with the experimental place-based mapping procedure, produces a greater benefit in speech recognition than maximizing bandwidth for CI-alone and EAS simulations. Ongoing work is evaluating the initial and long-term performance benefits in CI-alone and EAS users. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19529053.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret T. Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Brendan P. O'Connell
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Michael W. Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Joseph Hopfinger
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT, Brown KD, Pillsbury HC, Dedmon MM, O'Connell BP. Insertion Depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Comparative Study of 28- and 31.5-mm Lateral Wall Arrays. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:183-189. [PMID: 34772886 PMCID: PMC8752482 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 1) To compare speech recognition outcomes between cochlear implant (CI) recipients of 28- and 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode arrays, and 2) to characterize the relationship between angular insertion depth (AID) and speech recognition. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS Seventy-five adult CI recipients of fully inserted 28-mm (n = 28) or 31.5-mm (n = 47) lateral wall arrays listening with a CI-alone device. INTERVENTIONS Cochlear implantation with postoperative computed tomography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition assessed with the CI-alone at 12 months postactivation. RESULTS The mean AID of the most apical electrode contact for the 31.5-mm array recipients was significantly deeper than the 28-mm array recipients (628° vs 571°, p < 0.001). Following 12 months of listening experience, mean CNC word scores were significantly better for recipients of 31.5-mm arrays compared with those implanted with 28-mm arrays (59.5% vs 48.3%, p = 0.004; Cohen's d = 0.70; 95% CI [0.22, 1.18]). There was a significant positive correlation between AID and CNC word scores (r = 0.372, p = 0.001), with a plateau in performance observed around 600°. CONCLUSIONS Cochlear implant recipients implanted with a 31.5-mm array experienced better speech recognition than those with a 28-mm array at 12 months postactivation. Deeper insertion of a lateral wall array appears to confer speech recognition benefit up to ∼600°, with a plateau in performance observed thereafter. These data provide preliminary evidence of the insertion depth necessary to optimize speech recognition outcomes for lateral wall electrode arrays among CI-alone users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sagi E, Azadpour M, Neukam J, Capach NH, Svirsky MA. Reducing interaural tonotopic mismatch preserves binaural unmasking in cochlear implant simulations of single-sided deafness. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2021; 150:2316. [PMID: 34717490 PMCID: PMC8637719 DOI: 10.1121/10.0006446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Binaural unmasking, a key feature of normal binaural hearing, can refer to the improved intelligibility of masked speech by adding masking that facilitates perceived separation of target and masker. A question relevant for cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness (SSD-CI) is whether binaural unmasking can still be achieved if the additional masking is spectrally degraded and shifted. CIs restore some aspects of binaural hearing to these listeners, although binaural unmasking remains limited. Notably, these listeners may experience a mismatch between the frequency information perceived through the CI and that perceived by their normal hearing ear. Employing acoustic simulations of SSD-CI with normal hearing listeners, the present study confirms a previous simulation study that binaural unmasking is severely limited when interaural frequency mismatch between the input frequency range and simulated place of stimulation exceeds 1-2 mm. The present study also shows that binaural unmasking is largely retained when the input frequency range is adjusted to match simulated place of stimulation, even at the expense of removing low-frequency information. This result bears implications for the mechanisms driving the type of binaural unmasking of the present study and for mapping the frequency range of the CI speech processor in SSD-CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elad Sagi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Mahan Azadpour
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Jonathan Neukam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Nicole Hope Capach
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Mario A Svirsky
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cooperman SP, Aaron KA, Fouad A, Tran E, Blevins NH, Fitzgerald MB. Influence of electrode to cochlear duct length ratio on post-operative speech understanding outcomes. Cochlear Implants Int 2021; 23:59-69. [PMID: 34590531 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1979289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether the pre-operative electrode to cochlear duct length ratio (ECDLR), is associated with post-operative speech recognition outcomes. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective chart review study. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS The study included sixty-one adult CI recipients with a pre-operative computed tomography scan and a speech recognition test 12 months after implantation. INTERVENTIONS The average of two raters' cochlear duct length (CDL) measurements and the length of the recipient's cochlear implant electrode array formed the basis for the electrode-to-cochlear duct length ratio (ECLDR). Speech recognition tests were compared as a function of ECDLR and electrode array length itself. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The relationship between ECDLR and percent correct on speech recognition tests. RESULTS A second order polynomial regression relating ECDLR to percent correct on the CNC words speech recognition test was statistically significant, as was a fourth order polynomial regression for the AzBio Quiet test. In contrast, there was no statistically significant relationship between speech recognition scores and electrode array length. CONCLUSIONS ECDLR values can be statistically associated to speech-recognition outcomes. However, these ECDLR values cannot be predicted by the electrode length alone, and must include a measure of CDL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayna P Cooperman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ksenia A Aaron
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ayman Fouad
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Otolaryngology Department, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Emma Tran
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nikolas H Blevins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Matthew B Fitzgerald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Neves CA, Tran ED, Cooperman SP, Blevins NH. Fully Automated Measurement of Cochlear Duct Length From Clinical Temporal Bone Computed Tomography. Laryngoscope 2021; 132:449-458. [PMID: 34536238 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To present and validate a novel fully automated method to measure cochlear dimensions, including cochlear duct length (CDL). STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study. METHODS The computational method combined 1) a deep learning (DL) algorithm to segment the cochlea and otic capsule and 2) geometric analysis to measure anti-modiolar distances from the round window to the apex. The algorithm was trained using 165 manually segmented clinical computed tomography (CT). A Testing group of 159 CTs were then measured for cochlear diameter and width (A- and B-values) and CDL using the automated system and compared against manual measurements. The results were also compared with existing approaches and historical data. In addition, pre- and post-implantation scans from 27 cochlear implant recipients were studied to compare predicted versus actual array insertion depth. RESULTS Measurements were successfully obtained in 98.1% of scans. The mean CDL to 900° was 35.52 mm (SD, 2.06; range, [30.91-40.50]), the mean A-value was 8.88 mm (0.47; [7.67-10.49]), and mean B-value was 6.38 mm (0.42; [5.16-7.38]). The R2 fit of the automated to manual measurements was 0.87 for A-value, 0.70 for B-value, and 0.71 for CDL. For anti-modiolar arrays, the distance between the imaged and predicted array tip location was 0.57 mm (1.25; [0.13-5.28]). CONCLUSION Our method provides a fully automated means of cochlear analysis from clinical CTs. The distribution of CDL, dimensions, and cochlear quadrant lengths is similar to those from historical data. This approach requires no radiographic experience and is free from user-related variation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caio A Neves
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Emma D Tran
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, U.S.A
| | - Shayna P Cooperman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, U.S.A
| | - Nikolas H Blevins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear Hear 2021; 41:1349-1361. [PMID: 32205726 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The spatial position of a cochlear implant (CI) electrode array affects the spectral cues provided to the recipient. Differences in cochlear size and array length lead to substantial variability in angular insertion depth (AID) across and within array types. For CI-alone users, the variability in AID results in varying degrees of frequency-to-place mismatch between the default electric frequency filters and cochlear place of stimulation. For electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users, default electric frequency filters also vary as a function of residual acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. The present study aimed to (1) investigate variability in AID associated with lateral wall arrays, (2) determine the subsequent frequency-to-place mismatch for CI-alone and EAS users mapped with default frequency filters, and (3) examine the relationship between early speech perception for CI-alone users and two aspects of electrode position: frequency-to-place mismatch and angular separation between neighboring contacts, a metric associated with spectral selectivity at the periphery. DESIGN One hundred one adult CI recipients (111 ears) with MED-EL Flex24 (24 mm), Flex28 (28 mm), and FlexSOFT/Standard (31.5 mm) arrays underwent postoperative computed tomography to determine AID. A subsequent comparison was made between AID, predicted spiral ganglion place frequencies, and the default frequency filters for CI-alone (n = 84) and EAS users (n = 27). For CI-alone users with complete insertions who listened with maps fit with the default frequency filters (n = 48), frequency-to-place mismatch was quantified at 1500 Hz and angular separation between neighboring contacts was determined for electrodes in the 1 to 2 kHz region. Multiple linear regression was used to examine how frequency-to-place mismatch and angular separation of contacts influence consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores through 6 months postactivation. RESULTS For CI recipients with complete insertions (n = 106, 95.5%), the AID (mean ± standard deviation) of the most apical contact was 428° ± 34.3° for Flex24 (n = 11), 558° ± 65.4° for Flex28 (n = 48), and 636° ± 42.9° for FlexSOFT/Standard (n = 47) arrays. For CI-alone users, default frequency filters aligned closely with the spiral ganglion map for deeply inserted lateral wall arrays. For EAS users, default frequency filters produced a range of mismatches; absolute deviations of ≤ 6 semitones occurred in only 37% of cases. Participants with shallow insertions and minimal or no residual hearing experienced the greatest mismatch. For CI-alone users, both smaller frequency-to-place mismatch and greater angular separation between contacts were associated with better CNC scores during the initial 6 months of device use. CONCLUSIONS There is significant variability in frequency-to-place mismatch among CI-alone and EAS users with default frequency filters, even between individuals implanted with the same array. When using default frequency filters, mismatch can be minimized with longer lateral wall arrays and insertion depths that meet the edge frequency associated with residual hearing for CI-alone and EAS users, respectively. Smaller degrees of frequency-to-place mismatch and decreased peripheral masking due to more widely spaced contacts may independently support better speech perception with longer lateral wall arrays in CI-alone users.
Collapse
|
14
|
Cooperman SP, Aaron KA, Fouad A, Tran E, Blevins NH, Fitzgerald MB. Assessment of Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Tablet-Based Software to Measure Cochlear Duct Length. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:558-565. [PMID: 33492059 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to build upon previous work validating a tablet-based software to measure cochlear duct length (CDL). Here, we do so by greatly expanding the number of cochleae (n = 166) analyzed, and examined whether computed tomography (CT) slice thickness influences reliability of CDL measurements. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective chart review study. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Eighty-three adult cochlear implant recipients were included in the study. Both cochleae were measured for each patient (n = 166). INTERVENTIONS Three raters analyzed the scans of 166 cochleae at 2 different time points. Each rater individually identified anatomical landmarks that delineated the basal turn diameter and width. These coordinates were applied to the elliptic approximation method (ECA) to estimate CDL. The effect of CT scan slice thickness on the measurements was explored. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure is the strength of the inter- and intra-rater reliability. RESULTS The mean CDL measured was 32.84 ± 2.03 mm, with a range of 29.03 to 38.07 mm. We observed no significant relationship between slice thickness and CDL measurement (F1,164 = 3.04; p = 0.08). The mean absolute difference in CDL estimations between raters was 1.76 ± 1.24 mm and within raters was 0.263 ± 0.200 mm. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between raters was 0.54 and ranged from 0.63 to 0.83 within raters. CONCLUSIONS This software produces reliable measurements of CDL between and within raters, regardless of CT scan thickness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayna P Cooperman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ksenia A Aaron
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ayman Fouad
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Otolaryngology Department, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Emma Tran
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nikolas H Blevins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Matthew B Fitzgerald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dillon MT, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, Hopfinger J, O'Connell BP. Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:197-202. [PMID: 33885267 PMCID: PMC8787166 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The default mapping procedure for electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) devices uses the cochlear implant recipient's unaided detection thresholds in the implanted ear to derive the acoustic settings and assign the lowest frequency filter of electric stimulation. Individual differences for speech recognition with EAS may be due to discrepancies between the electric frequency filters of individual electrode contacts and the cochlear place of stimulation, known as a frequency-to-place mismatch. Frequency-to-place mismatch of greater than 1/2 octave has been demonstrated in up to 60% of EAS users. Aligning the electric frequency filters via a place-based mapping procedure using postoperative imaging may improve speech recognition with EAS. METHODS Masked sentence recognition was evaluated for normal-hearing subjects (n = 17) listening with vocoder simulations of EAS, using a place-based map and a default map. Simulation parameters were based on audiometric and imaging data from a representative 24-mm electrode array recipient and EAS user. The place-based map aligned electric frequency filters with the cochlear place frequency, which introduced a gap between the simulated acoustic and electric output. The default map settings were derived from the clinical programming software and provided the full speech frequency range. RESULTS Masked sentence recognition was significantly better for simulated EAS with the place-based map as compared with the default map. CONCLUSION The simulated EAS place-based map supported better performance than the simulated EAS default map. This indicates that individualizing maps may improve performance in EAS users by helping them achieve better asymptotic performance earlier and mitigate the need for acclimatization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
- Division of Speech & Hearing, Department of Allied Health Sciences
| | | | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
| | - Joseph Hopfinger
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240752. [PMID: 33057396 PMCID: PMC7561114 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In bimodal listening, cochlear implant (CI) users combine electric hearing (EH) in one ear and acoustic hearing (AH) in the other ear. In electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS), CI users combine EH and AH in the same ear. In quiet, integration of EH and AH has been shown to be better with EAS, but with greater sensitivity to tonotopic mismatch in EH. The goal of the present study was to evaluate how external noise might affect integration of AH and EH within or across ears. Recognition of monosyllabic words was measured for normal-hearing subjects listening to simulations of unimodal (AH or EH alone), EAS, and bimodal listening in quiet and in speech-shaped steady noise (10 dB, 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio). The input/output frequency range for AH was 0.1–0.6 kHz. EH was simulated using an 8-channel noise vocoder. The output frequency range was 1.2–8.0 kHz to simulate a shallow insertion depth. The input frequency range was either matched (1.2–8.0 kHz) or mismatched (0.6–8.0 kHz) to the output frequency range; the mismatched input range maximized the amount of speech information, while the matched input resulted in some speech information loss. In quiet, tonotopic mismatch differently affected EAS and bimodal performance. In noise, EAS and bimodal performance was similarly affected by tonotopic mismatch. The data suggest that tonotopic mismatch may differently affect integration of EH and AH in quiet and in noise.
Collapse
|
17
|
Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT, Buchman CA, Buss E, O'Connell BP, Rooth MA, King ER, Pillsbury HC, Adunka OF, Brown KD. Long-Term Influence of Electrode Array Length on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:892-897. [PMID: 32738069 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Results from a prospective trial demonstrated better speech recognition for cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a long lateral wall electrode array compared to subjects with a short array after 1 year of listening experience. As short array recipients may require an extended adaptation period, this study investigated whether differences in speech recognition continued through 4 years of CI use. STUDY DESIGN Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. METHODS Subjects were randomized to receive a MED-EL medium (24 mm) or standard (31.5 mm) array. Linear mixed models compared speech recognition between cohorts with word recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 months postactivation. Postoperative imaging and electric frequency filters were reviewed to assess the influence of frequency-to-place mismatch and angular separation between neighboring contacts, a metric associated with peripheral spectral selectivity. RESULTS Long (31.5 mm) array recipients demonstrated superior speech recognition out to 4 years postactivation. There was a significant effect of angular separation between contacts, with more closely spaced contacts associated with poorer speech recognition. There was no significant effect of mismatch, yet this may have been obscured by changes in frequency filters over time. CONCLUSIONS Conventional MED-EL CI recipients implanted with 31.5-mm arrays experience better speech recognition than 24-mm array recipients, initially and with long-term listening experience. The benefit conferred by longer arrays in the present cohort can be partially attributed to more widely spaced electrode contacts, presumably a result of reduced channel interaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 131:892-897, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Craig A Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A
| | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Brendan P O'Connell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Meredith A Rooth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - English R King
- Department of Audiology, University of North Carolina Health Care, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Harold C Pillsbury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Oliver F Adunka
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Canfarotta MW, O'Connell BP, Buss E, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD, Dillon MT. Influence of Age at Cochlear Implantation and Frequency-to-Place Mismatch on Early Speech Recognition in Adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 162:926-932. [PMID: 32178574 PMCID: PMC8590812 DOI: 10.1177/0194599820911707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Default frequency filters of cochlear implant (CI) devices assign frequency information irrespective of intracochlear position, resulting in varying degrees of frequency-to-place mismatch. Substantial mismatch negatively influences speech recognition in postlingually deafened CI recipients, and acclimatization may be particularly challenging for older adults due to effects of aging on the auditory pathway. The present report investigated the influence of mismatch and age at implantation on speech recognition within the initial 6 months of CI use. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Forty-eight postlingually deafened adult CI recipients of lateral wall electrode arrays underwent postoperative computed tomography to determine angular insertion depth of each electrode contact. Frequency-to-place mismatch was determined by comparing spiral ganglion place frequencies to default frequency filters. Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores in the CI-alone condition at 1, 3, and 6 months postactivation were compared to the degree of mismatch at 1500 Hz and age at implantation. RESULTS Younger adult CI recipients experienced more rapid growth in speech recognition during the initial 6 months postactivation. Greater degrees of frequency-to-place mismatch were associated with poorer performance, yet older listeners were not particularly susceptible to this effect. CONCLUSIONS While older adults are not necessarily more sensitive to detrimental effects of frequency-to-place mismatch, other factors appear to limit early benefit with a CI in this population. These results suggest that minimizing mismatch could optimize outcomes in adult CI recipients across the life span, which may be particularly beneficial in the elderly considering auditory processing deficits associated with advanced age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brendan P O'Connell
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Harold C Pillsbury
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Luo X, Garrett C. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2020; 390:107949. [PMID: 32200300 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Phantom electrode (PE) stimulation can extend the lower limit of pitch perception with cochlear implants (CIs) by using simultaneous out-of-phase stimulation of the most apical primary electrode and the adjacent basal compensating electrode. The total electrical field may push the excitation pattern beyond the most apical electrode to elicit a lower pitch, depending on the ratio of current between the compensating and primary electrodes (i.e., the compensation coefficient σ). This study tested the hypothesis that dynamic current steering of PE stimuli can be implemented by varying σ over time to encode spectral details in low frequencies. To determine the range of σ for current steering and the corresponding current levels, Experiment 1 tested CI users' loudness balance and pitch ranking of static PE stimuli with σ from 0 to 0.6 in steps of 0.2. It was found that the equal-loudness most comfortable level significantly increased with σ and can be modeled by a piecewise linear function of σ. Consistent with the previous findings, higher σ elicited either lower or similar pitches without salient pitch reversals than lower σ. Based on the results of Experiment 1, Experiment 2 created flat, rising, and falling pitch contours of 300-1000 ms using dynamic PE stimuli with time-varying σ from 0 to 0.6 and equal-loudness current levels. In a pitch contour identification (PCI) task, CI users scored 80% and above on average. Increasing the stimulus duration from 300 to 1000 ms slightly but did not significantly improve the PCI scores. Across subjects, the 1000-ms PCI scores in Experiment 2 were significantly correlated with the cumulative pitch-ranking sensitivity in Experiment 1. It is thus feasible to use dynamic current steering with PE to encode low-frequency pitch cues for CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Luo
- Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Av., P.O. Box 870102, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
| | - Christopher Garrett
- Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Av., P.O. Box 870102, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jiam NT, Gilbert M, Cooke D, Jiradejvong P, Barrett K, Caldwell M, Limb CJ. Association Between Flat-Panel Computed Tomographic Imaging-Guided Place-Pitch Mapping and Speech and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 145:109-116. [PMID: 30477013 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.3096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Importance Cochlear implant users generally display poor pitch perception. Flat-panel computed tomography (FPCT) has recently emerged as a modality capable of localizing individual electrode contacts within the cochlea in vivo. Significant place-pitch mismatch between the clinical implant processing settings given to patients and the theoretical maps based on FPCT imaging has previously been noted. Objective To assess whether place-pitch mismatch is associated with poor cochlear implant-mediated pitch perception through evaluation of an individualized, image-guided approach toward cochlear implant programming on speech and music perception among cochlear implant users. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective cohort study of 17 cochlear implant users with MED-EL electrode arrays was performed at a tertiary referral center. The study was conducted from June 2016 to July 2017. Interventions Theoretical place-pitch maps using FPCT secondary reconstructions and 3-dimensional curved planar re-formation software were developed. The clinical map settings (eg, strategy, rate, volume, frequency band range) were modified to keep factors constant between the 2 maps and minimize confounding. The acclimation period to the maps was 30 minutes. Main Outcomes and Measures Participants performed speech perception tasks (eg, consonant-nucleus-consonant, Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise, vowel identification) and a pitch-scaling task while using the image-guided place-pitch map (intervention) and the modified clinical map (control). Performance scores between the 2 interventions were measured. Results Of the 17 participants, 10 (58.8%) were women; mean (SD) was 59 (11.3) years. A significant median increase in pitch scaling accuracy was noted when using the experimental map compared with the control map (4 more correct answers; 95% CI, 0-8). Specifically, the number of pitch-scaling reversals for notes spaced at 1.65 semitones or greater decreased when an image-based approach to cochlear implant programming was used vs the modified clinical map (4 mistakes; 95% CI, 0.5-7). Although there was no observable median improvement in speech perception during use of an image-based map, the acute changes in frequency allocation and electrode channel deactivations used with the image-guided maps did not worsen consonant-nucleus-consonant (-1% correct phonemes, 95% CI, -2.5% to 6%) and Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise (0.5-dB difference; 95% CI, -0.75 to 2.25 dB) median performance results relative to the clinical maps used by the patients. Conclusions and Relevance An image-based approach toward ochlear implant mapping may improve pitch perception outcomes by reducing place-pitch mismatch. Studies using a longer acclimation period with chronic stimulation over months may help assess the full range of the benefits associated with personalized image-guided cochlear implant mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole T Jiam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Melanie Gilbert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Daniel Cooke
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Patpong Jiradejvong
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Karen Barrett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Charles J Limb
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sagi E, Svirsky MA. Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach. Hear Res 2018; 370:316-328. [PMID: 30396747 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
A potential bottleneck to improving speech perception performance in cochlear implant (CI) users is that some of their electrodes may poorly encode speech information. Several studies have examined the effect of deactivating poorly encoding electrodes on speech perception with mixed results. Many of these studies focused on identifying poorly encoding electrodes by some measure (e.g. electrode discrimination, pitch ordering, threshold, CT-guided, masked modulation detection), but provide inconsistent criteria about which electrodes, and how many, should be deactivated, and without considering how speech information becomes distributed across the electrode array. The present simulation study addresses this issue using computational approaches. Previously validated models were used to generate predictions of speech scores as a function of all possible combinations of active electrodes in a 22-electrode array in three groups of hypothetical subjects representative of relatively better, moderate, and poorer performing CI users. Using high-performance computing, over 500 million predictions were generated. Although deactivation of the poorest encoding electrodes sometimes resulted in predicted benefit, this benefit was significantly less relative to predictions resulting from model-optimized deactivations. This trend persisted when using novel stimuli (i.e. other than those used for optimization) and when using different processing strategies. Optimum electrode deactivation patterns produced an average predicted increase in word scores of 10% with some scores increasing by more than 20%. Optimum electrode deactivation patterns typically included 11 to 19 (out of 22) active electrodes, depending on the performance group. Optimal active electrode combinations were those that maximized discrimination of speech cues, maintaining 80%-100% of the physical span of the array. The present study demonstrates the potential for further improving CI users' speech scores with appropriate selection of active electrodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elad Sagi
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
A Smartphone Application for Customized Frequency Table Selection in Cochlear Implants. Otol Neurotol 2018; 38:e253-e261. [PMID: 28806335 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS A novel smartphone-based software application can facilitate self-selection of frequency allocation tables (FAT) in postlingually deaf cochlear implant (CI) users. BACKGROUND CIs use FATs to represent the tonotopic organization of a normal cochlea. Current CI fitting methods typically use a standard FAT for all patients regardless of individual differences in cochlear size and electrode location. In postlingually deaf patients, different amounts of mismatch can result between the frequency-place function they experienced when they had normal hearing and the frequency-place function that results from the standard FAT. For some CI users, an alternative FAT may enhance sound quality or speech perception. Currently, no widely available tools exist to aid real-time selection of different FATs. This study aims to develop a new smartphone tool for this purpose and to evaluate speech perception and sound quality measures in a pilot study of CI subjects using this application. METHODS A smartphone application for a widely available mobile platform (iOS) was developed to serve as a preprocessor of auditory input to a clinical CI speech processor and enable interactive real-time selection of FATs. The application's output was validated by measuring electrodograms for various inputs. A pilot study was conducted in six CI subjects. Speech perception was evaluated using word recognition tests. RESULTS All subjects successfully used the portable application with their clinical speech processors to experience different FATs while listening to running speech. The users were all able to select one table that they judged provided the best sound quality. All subjects chose a FAT different from the standard FAT in their everyday clinical processor. Using the smartphone application, the mean consonant-nucleus-consonant score with the default FAT selection was 28.5% (SD 16.8) and 29.5% (SD 16.4) when using a self-selected FAT. CONCLUSION A portable smartphone application enables CI users to self-select frequency allocation tables in real time. Even though the self-selected FATs that were deemed to have better sound quality were only tested acutely (i.e., without long-term experience with them), speech perception scores were not inferior to those obtained with the clinical FATs. This software application may be a valuable tool for improving future methods of CI fitting.
Collapse
|
23
|
Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears. Sci Rep 2017; 7:12500. [PMID: 28970567 PMCID: PMC5624923 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12298-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in cochlear implant (CI) technology allow for acoustic and electric hearing to be combined within the same ear (electric-acoustic stimulation, or EAS) and/or across ears (bimodal listening). Integration efficiency (IE; the ratio between observed and predicted performance for acoustic-electric hearing) can be used to estimate how well acoustic and electric hearing are combined. The goal of this study was to evaluate factors that affect IE in EAS and bimodal listening. Vowel recognition was measured in normal-hearing subjects listening to simulations of unimodal, EAS, and bimodal listening. The input/output frequency range for acoustic hearing was 0.1–0.6 kHz. For CI simulations, the output frequency range was 1.2–8.0 kHz to simulate a shallow insertion depth and the input frequency range was varied to provide increasing amounts of speech information and tonotopic mismatch. Performance was best when acoustic and electric hearing was combined in the same ear. IE was significantly better for EAS than for bimodal listening; IE was sensitive to tonotopic mismatch for EAS, but not for bimodal listening. These simulation results suggest acoustic and electric hearing may be more effectively and efficiently combined within rather than across ears, and that tonotopic mismatch should be minimized to maximize the benefit of acoustic-electric hearing, especially for EAS.
Collapse
|
24
|
Initial Operative Experience and Short-term Hearing Preservation Results With a Mid-scala Cochlear Implant Electrode Array. Otol Neurotol 2017; 37:1549-1554. [PMID: 27755356 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe our initial operative experience and hearing preservation results with the Advanced Bionics (AB) Mid Scala Electrode (MSE). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Sixty-three MSE implants in pediatric and adult patients were compared with age- and sex-matched 1j electrode implants from the same manufacturer. All patients were severe to profoundly deaf. INTERVENTION Cochlear implantation with either the AB 1j electrode or the AB MSE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The MSE and 1j electrodes were compared in their angular depth of insertion and pre to postoperative change in hearing thresholds. Hearing preservation was analyzed as a function of angular depth of insertion. Secondary outcome measures included operative time, incidence of abnormal intraoperative impedance and telemetry values, and incidence of postsurgical complications. RESULTS Depth of insertion was similar for both electrodes, but was more consistent for the MSE array and more variable for the 1j array. Patients with MSE electrodes had better hearing preservation. Thresholds shifts at four audiometric frequencies ranging from 250 to 2000 Hz were 10, 7, 2, and 6 dB smaller for the MSE electrode than for the 1j (p < 0.05). Hearing preservation at low frequencies was worse with deeper insertion, regardless of array. Secondary outcome measures were similar for both electrodes. CONCLUSION The MSE electrode resulted in more consistent insertion depth and somewhat better hearing preservation than the 1j electrode. Differences in other surgical outcome measures were small or unlikely to have a meaningful effect.
Collapse
|
25
|
Sagi E, Svirsky MA. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2017; 141:1027. [PMID: 28253672 PMCID: PMC5392095 DOI: 10.1121/1.4976059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2016] [Revised: 01/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Cochlear implant (CI) recipients have difficulty understanding speech in noise even at moderate signal-to-noise ratios. Knowing the mechanisms they use to understand speech in noise may facilitate the search for better speech processing algorithms. In the present study, a computational model is used to assess whether CI users' vowel identification in noise can be explained by formant frequency cues (F1 and F2). Vowel identification was tested with 12 unilateral CI users in quiet and in noise. Formant cues were measured from vowels in each condition, specific to each subject's speech processor. Noise distorted the location of vowels in the F2 vs F1 plane in comparison to quiet. The best fit model to subjects' data in quiet produced model predictions in noise that were within 8% of actual scores on average. Predictions in noise were much better when assuming that subjects used a priori knowledge regarding how formant information is degraded in noise (experiment 1). However, the model's best fit to subjects' confusion matrices in noise was worse than in quiet, suggesting that CI users utilize formant cues to identify vowels in noise, but to a different extent than how they identify vowels in quiet (experiment 2).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elad Sagi
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Mario A Svirsky
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Debruyne JA, Francart T, Janssen AML, Douma K, Brokx JPL. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance. Int J Audiol 2016; 56:174-185. [PMID: 27758152 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1243262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated the hypotheses that (1) prelingually deafened CI users do not have perfect electrode discrimination ability and (2) the deactivation of non-discriminable electrodes can improve auditory performance. DESIGN Electrode discrimination difference limens were determined for all electrodes of the array. The subjects' basic map was subsequently compared to an experimental map, which contained only discriminable electrodes, with respect to speech understanding in quiet and in noise, listening effort, spectral ripple discrimination and subjective appreciation. STUDY SAMPLE Subjects were six prelingually deafened, late implanted adults using the Nucleus cochlear implant. RESULTS Electrode discrimination difference limens across all subjects and electrodes ranged from 0.5 to 7.125, with significantly larger limens for basal electrodes. No significant differences were found between the basic map and the experimental map on auditory tests. Subjective appreciation was found to be significantly poorer for the experimental map. CONCLUSIONS Prelingually deafened CI users were unable to discriminate between all adjacent electrodes. There was no difference in auditory performance between the basic and experimental map. Potential factors contributing to the absence of improvement with the experimental map include the reduced number of maxima, incomplete adaptation to the new frequency allocation, and the mainly basal location of deactivated electrodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joke A Debruyne
- a Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery , Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,b School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University , Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Francart
- c Leuven Department of Neurosciences , KU , ExpORL , Belgium
| | - A Miranda L Janssen
- a Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery , Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,d School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI) , Department of Methodology and Statistics , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands , and
| | - Kim Douma
- a Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery , Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,e Adelante , Center of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology , Hoensbroek , The Netherlands
| | - Jan P L Brokx
- a Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery , Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,b School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University , Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Reiss LAJ, Eggleston JL, Walker EP, Oh Y. Two Ears Are Not Always Better than One: Mandatory Vowel Fusion Across Spectrally Mismatched Ears in Hearing-Impaired Listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2016; 17:341-56. [PMID: 27220769 PMCID: PMC4940290 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0570-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 04/24/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Hearing loss and auditory prostheses can alter auditory processing by inducing large pitch mismatches and broad pitch fusion between the two ears. Similar to integration of incongruent inputs in other sensory modalities, the mismatched, fused pitches are often averaged across ears for simple stimuli. Here, we measured parallel effects on complex stimulus integration using a new technique based on vowel classification in five bilateral hearing aid users and eight bimodal cochlear implant users. Continua between five pairs of synthetic vowels were created by varying the first formant spectral peak while keeping the second formant constant. Comparison of binaural and monaural vowel classification functions for each vowel pair continuum enabled visualization of the following frequency-dependent integration trends: (1) similar monaural and binaural functions, (2) ear dominance, (3) binaural averaging, and (4) binaural interference. Hearing aid users showed all trends, while bimodal cochlear implant users showed mostly ear dominance or interference. Interaural pitch mismatches, frequency ranges of binaural pitch fusion, and the relative weightings of pitch averaging across ears were also measured using tone and/or electrode stimulation. The presence of both large interaural pitch mismatches and broad pitch fusion was not sufficient to predict vowel integration trends such as binaural averaging or interference. The way that pitch averaging was weighted between ears also appears to be important for determining binaural vowel integration trends. Abnormally broad spectral fusion and the associated phoneme fusion across mismatched ears may underlie binaural speech perception interference observed in hearing aid and cochlear implant users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina A J Reiss
- Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Jessica L Eggleston
- Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Emily P Walker
- Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Yonghee Oh
- Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Landsberger DM, Svrakic M, Roland JT, Svirsky M. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants. Ear Hear 2016; 36:e207-13. [PMID: 25860624 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Commercially available cochlear implant systems attempt to deliver frequency information going down to a few hundred Hertz, but the electrode arrays are not designed to reach the most apical regions of the cochlea, which correspond to these low frequencies. This may cause a mismatch between the frequencies presented by a cochlear implant electrode array and the frequencies represented at the corresponding location in a normal-hearing cochlea. In the following study, the mismatch between the frequency presented at a given cochlear angle and the frequency expected by an acoustic hearing ear at the corresponding angle is examined for the cochlear implant systems that are most commonly used in the United States. DESIGN The angular insertion of each of the electrodes on four different electrode arrays (MED-EL Standard, MED-EL Flex28, Advanced Bionics HiFocus 1J, and Cochlear Contour Advance) was estimated from X-ray. For the angular location of each electrode on each electrode array, the predicted spiral ganglion frequency was estimated. The predicted spiral ganglion frequency was compared with the center frequency provided by the corresponding electrode using the manufacturer's default frequency-to-electrode allocation. RESULTS Differences across devices were observed for the place of stimulation for frequencies below 650 Hz. Longer electrode arrays (i.e., the MED-EL Standard and Flex28) demonstrated smaller deviations from the spiral ganglion map than the other electrode arrays. For insertion angles up to approximately 270°, the frequencies presented at a given location were typically approximately an octave below what would be expected by a spiral ganglion frequency map, while the deviations were larger for angles deeper than 270°. For frequencies above 650 Hz, the frequency to angle relationship was consistent across all four electrode models. CONCLUSIONS A mismatch was observed between the predicted frequency and the default frequency provided by every electrode on all electrode arrays. The mismatch can be reduced by changing the default frequency allocations, inserting electrodes deeper into the cochlea, or allowing cochlear implant users to adapt to the mismatch. Further studies are required to fully assess the clinical significance of the frequency mismatch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Landsberger
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Won JH, Tremblay K, Clinard CG, Wright RA, Sagi E, Svirsky M. The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2016; 139:1-11. [PMID: 26826999 PMCID: PMC4706540 DOI: 10.1121/1.4931909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2015] [Revised: 09/04/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Even though speech signals trigger coding in the cochlea to convey speech information to the central auditory structures, little is known about the neural mechanisms involved in such processes. The purpose of this study was to understand the encoding of formant cues and how it relates to vowel recognition in listeners. Neural representations of formants may differ across listeners; however, it was hypothesized that neural patterns could still predict vowel recognition. To test the hypothesis, the frequency-following response (FFR) and vowel recognition were obtained from 38 normal-hearing listeners using four different vowels, allowing direct comparisons between behavioral and neural data in the same individuals. FFR was employed because it provides an objective and physiological measure of neural activity that can reflect formant encoding. A mathematical model was used to describe vowel confusion patterns based on the neural responses to vowel formant cues. The major findings were (1) there were large variations in the accuracy of vowel formant encoding across listeners as indexed by the FFR, (2) these variations were systematically related to vowel recognition performance, and (3) the mathematical model of vowel identification was successful in predicting good vs poor vowel identification performers based exclusively on physiological data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Ho Won
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Kelly Tremblay
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Christopher G Clinard
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807, USA
| | - Richard A Wright
- Department of Linguistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Elad Sagi
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Mario Svirsky
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Svirsky MA, Fitzgerald MB, Sagi E, Glassman EK. Bilateral cochlear implants with large asymmetries in electrode insertion depth: implications for the study of auditory plasticity. Acta Otolaryngol 2015; 135:354-63. [PMID: 25719506 DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2014.1002052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
CONCLUSION The human frequency-to-place map may be modified by experience, even in adult listeners. However, such plasticity has limitations. Knowledge of the extent and the limitations of human auditory plasticity can help optimize parameter settings in users of auditory prostheses. OBJECTIVES To what extent can adults adapt to sharply different frequency-to-place maps across ears? This question was investigated in two bilateral cochlear implant users who had a full electrode insertion in one ear, a much shallower insertion in the other ear, and standard frequency-to-electrode maps in both ears. METHODS Three methods were used to assess adaptation to the frequency-to-electrode maps in each ear: (1) pitch matching of electrodes in opposite ears, (2) listener-driven selection of the most intelligible frequency-to-electrode map, and (3) speech perception tests. Based on these measurements, one subject was fitted with an alternative frequency-to-electrode map, which sought to compensate for her incomplete adaptation to the standard frequency-to-electrode map. RESULTS Both listeners showed remarkable ability to adapt, but such adaptation remained incomplete for the ear with the shallower electrode insertion, even after extended experience. The alternative frequency-to-electrode map that was tested resulted in substantial increases in speech perception for one subject in the short insertion ear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario A Svirsky
- Department of Otolaryngology-HNS, New York University School of Medicine , New York, NY , USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Venail F, Mathiolon C, Menjot de Champfleur S, Piron JP, Sicard M, Villemus F, Vessigaud MA, Sterkers-Artieres F, Mondain M, Uziel A. Effects of Electrode Array Length on Frequency-Place Mismatch and Speech Perception with Cochlear Implants. Audiol Neurootol 2015; 20:102-11. [DOI: 10.1159/000369333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 10/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Frequency-place mismatch often occurs after cochlear implantation, yet its effect on speech perception outcome remains unclear. In this article, we propose a method, based on cochlea imaging, to determine the cochlear place-frequency map. We evaluated the effect of frequency-place mismatch on speech perception outcome in subjects implanted with 3 different lengths of electrode arrays. A deeper insertion was responsible for a larger frequency-place mismatch and a decreased and delayed speech perception improvement by comparison with a shallower insertion, for which a similar but slighter effect was noticed. Our results support the notion that selecting an electrode array length adapted to each individual's cochlear anatomy may reduce frequency-place mismatch and thus improve speech perception outcome.
Collapse
|
33
|
Grasmeder ML, Verschuur CA, Batty VB. Optimizing frequency-to-electrode allocation for individual cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2014; 136:3313. [PMID: 25480076 DOI: 10.1121/1.4900831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Individual adjustment of frequency-to-electrode assignment in cochlear implants (CIs) may potentially improve speech perception outcomes. Twelve adult CI users were recruited for an experiment, in which frequency maps were adjusted using insertion angles estimated from post-operative x rays; results were analyzed for ten participants with good quality x rays. The allocations were a mapping to the Greenwood function, a compressed map limited to the area containing spiral ganglion (SG) cells, a reduced frequency range map (RFR), and participants' clinical maps. A trial period of at least six weeks was given for the clinical, Greenwood, and SG maps although participants could return to their clinical map if they wished. Performance with the Greenwood map was poor for both sentence and vowel perception and correlated with insertion angle; performance with the SG map was poorer than for the clinical map. The RFR map was significantly better than the clinical map for three participants, for sentence perception, but worse for three others. Those with improved performance had relatively deep insertions and poor electrode discrimination ability for apical electrodes. The results suggest that CI performance could be improved by adjustment of the frequency allocation, based on a measure of insertion angle and/or electrode discrimination ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary L Grasmeder
- Auditory Implant Service, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, Building 19, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| | - Carl A Verschuur
- Auditory Implant Service, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, Building 19, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent B Batty
- Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Svirsky MA, Talavage TM, Sinha S, Neuburger H, Azadpour M. Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch. Hear Res 2014; 322:163-70. [PMID: 25445816 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2014] [Revised: 10/13/2014] [Accepted: 10/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
What is the best way to help humans adapt to a distorted sensory input? Interest in this question is more than academic. The answer may help facilitate auditory learning by people who became deaf after learning language and later received a cochlear implant (a neural prosthesis that restores hearing through direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve). There is evidence that some cochlear implants (which provide information that is spectrally degraded to begin with) stimulate neurons with higher characteristic frequency than the acoustic frequency of the original stimulus. In other words, the stimulus is shifted in frequency with respect to what the listener expects to hear. This frequency misalignment may have a negative influence on speech perception by CI users. However, a perfect frequency-place alignment may result in the loss of important low frequency speech information. A trade-off may involve a gradual approach: start with correct frequency-place alignment to allow listeners to adapt to the spectrally degraded signal first, and then gradually increase the frequency shift to allow them to adapt to it over time. We used an acoustic model of a cochlear implant to measure adaptation to a frequency-shifted signal, using either the gradual approach or the "standard" approach (sudden imposition of the frequency shift). Listeners in both groups showed substantial auditory learning, as measured by increases in speech perception scores over the course of fifteen one-hour training sessions. However, the learning process was faster for listeners who were exposed to the gradual approach. These results suggest that gradual rather than sudden exposure may facilitate perceptual learning in the face of a spectrally degraded, frequency-shifted input. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled <Lasker Award>.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario A Svirsky
- Dept. of Otolaryngology-HNS, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Center of Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Thomas M Talavage
- ECE, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; BME Depts., Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | | | - Heidi Neuburger
- Dept. of Otolaryngology-HNS, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Mahan Azadpour
- Dept. of Otolaryngology-HNS, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fitzgerald MB, Sagi E, Morbiwala TA, Tan CT, Svirsky MA. Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant. Ear Hear 2013; 34:763-72. [PMID: 23807089 PMCID: PMC3899943 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3182967534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Perception of spectrally degraded speech is particularly difficult when the signal is also distorted along the frequency axis. This might be particularly important for post-lingually deafened recipients of cochlear implants (CIs), who must adapt to a signal where there may be a mismatch between the frequencies of an input signal and the characteristic frequencies of the neurons stimulated by the CI. However, there is a lack of tools that can be used to identify whether an individual has adapted fully to a mismatch in the frequency-to-place relationship and if so, to find a frequency table that ameliorates any negative effects of an unadapted mismatch. The goal of the proposed investigation is to test the feasibility of whether real-time selection of frequency tables can be used to identify cases in which listeners have not fully adapted to a frequency mismatch. The assumption underlying this approach is that listeners who have not adapted to a frequency mismatch will select a frequency table that minimizes any such mismatches, even at the expense of reducing the information provided by this frequency table. DESIGN Thirty-four normal-hearing adults listened to a noise-vocoded acoustic simulation of a CI and adjusted the frequency table in real time until they obtained a frequency table that sounded "most intelligible" to them. The use of an acoustic simulation was essential to this study because it allowed the authors to explicitly control the degree of frequency mismatch present in the simulation. None of the listeners had any previous experience with vocoded speech, in order to test the hypothesis that the real-time selection procedure could be used to identify cases in which a listener has not adapted to a frequency mismatch. After obtaining a self-selected table, the authors measured consonant nucleus consonant word-recognition scores with that self-selected table and two other frequency tables: a "frequency-matched" table that matched the analysis filters with the noisebands of the noise-vocoder simulation, and a "right information" table that is similar to that used in most CI speech processors, but in this simulation results in a frequency shift equivalent to 6.5 mm of cochlear space. RESULTS Listeners tended to select a table that was very close to, but shifted slightly lower in frequency from the frequency-matched table. The real-time selection process took on average 2 to 3 min for each trial, and the between-trial variability was comparable with that previously observed with closely related procedures. The word-recognition scores with the self-selected table were clearly higher than with the right-information table and slightly higher than with the frequency-matched table. CONCLUSIONS Real-time self-selection of frequency tables may be a viable tool for identifying listeners who have not adapted to a mismatch in the frequency-to-place relationship, and to find a frequency table that is more appropriate for them. Moreover, the small but significant improvements in word-recognition ability observed with the self-selected table suggest that these listeners based their selections on intelligibility rather than some other factor. The within-subject variability in the real-time selection procedure was comparable with that of a genetic algorithm, and the speed of the real-time procedure appeared to be faster than either a genetic algorithm or a simplex procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B Fitzgerald
- 1Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; and 2Precor Corp., Woodinville, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Svirsky MA, Fitzgerald MB, Neuman A, Sagi E, Tan CT, Ketten D, Martin B. Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research. J Am Acad Audiol 2012; 23:422-37. [PMID: 22668763 PMCID: PMC3677062 DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.23.6.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The Laboratory of Translational Auditory Research (LTAR/NYUSM) is part of the Department of Otolaryngology at the New York University School of Medicine and has close ties to the New York University Cochlear Implant Center. LTAR investigators have expertise in multiple related disciplines including speech and hearing science, audiology, engineering, and physiology. The lines of research in the laboratory deal mostly with speech perception by hearing impaired listeners, and particularly those who use cochlear implants (CIs) or hearing aids (HAs). Although the laboratory's research interests are diverse, there are common threads that permeate and tie all of its work. In particular, a strong interest in translational research underlies even the most basic studies carried out in the laboratory. Another important element is the development of engineering and computational tools, which range from mathematical models of speech perception to software and hardware that bypass clinical speech processors and stimulate cochlear implants directly, to novel ways of analyzing clinical outcomes data. If the appropriate tool to conduct an important experiment does not exist, we may work to develop it, either in house or in collaboration with academic or industrial partners. Another notable characteristic of the laboratory is its interdisciplinary nature where, for example, an audiologist and an engineer might work closely to develop an approach that would not have been feasible if each had worked singly on the project. Similarly, investigators with expertise in hearing aids and cochlear implants might join forces to study how human listeners integrate information provided by a CI and a HA. The following pages provide a flavor of the diversity and the commonalities of our research interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario A Svirsky
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review examines evidence for potential benefits of using cochlear implant electrodes that extend into the apical regions of the cochlea. Most cochlear implant systems use electrode arrays that extend 1 to 1.5 turns from the basal cochleostomy, but one manufacturer (MED-EL GmbH) uses an electrode array that is considerably longer. The fundamental rationale for using electrodes extending toward the apex of the cochlea is to provide additional low-pitched auditory percepts and thereby increase the spectral information available to the user. Several experimental long arrays have also been produced by other manufacturers to assess potential benefits of this approach. DESIGN In addition to assessing the effects of deeply inserted electrodes on performance, this review examines several underlying and associated issues, including cochlear anatomy, electrode design, surgical considerations (including insertion trauma), and pitch scaling trials. Where possible, the aim is to draw conclusions regarding the potential from apical electrodes in general, rather than relating to the performance of specific and current devices. RESULTS Imaging studies indicate that currently available electrode arrays rarely extend more than two turns into the cochlea, the mean insertion angle for full insertions of the MED-EL electrodes being about 630°. This is considerably shorter than the total length of the cochlea and more closely approximates the length of the spiral ganglion. Anatomical considerations, and some modelling studies, suggest that fabrication of even longer electrodes is unlikely to provide additional spectral information. The issue of potential benefit from the most apical electrodes, therefore, is whether they are able to selectively stimulate discrete and tonotopically ordered neural populations near the apex of the spiral ganglion, where the ganglion cells are closely grouped. Pitch scaling studies, using the MED-EL and experimental long arrays, suggest that this is achieved in many cases, but that a significant number of individuals show evidence of pitch confusions or reversals among the most apical electrodes, presumably reducing potential performance benefit and presenting challenges for processor programming. CONCLUSIONS Benefits in terms of speech recognition and other performance measures are less clear. Several studies have indicated that deactivation of apical electrodes results in poorer speech recognition performance, but these have been mostly acute studies where the subjects have been accustomed to the full complement of electrodes, thus making interpretation difficult. Some chronic studies have suggested that apical electrodes do provide additional performance benefit, but others have shown performance improvement after deactivating some of the apical electrodes. Whether or not deeply inserted electrodes can offer performance benefits, there is evidence that currently available designs tend to produce more intracochlear trauma than shorter arrays, in terms of loss of residual acoustic hearing and reduction of the neural substrate. This may have important long-term consequences for the user. Furthermore, as it is possible that subjects with better low-frequency residual hearing are more likely to benefit from the inclusion of apical electrodes, there may be a potential clinical dilemma as the same subjects are those most likely to benefit from bimodal electroacoustic stimulation, requiring a relatively shallow insertion.
Collapse
|
39
|
Svirsky MA, Sagi E, Meyer TA, Kaiser AR, Teoh SW. A mathematical model of medial consonant identification by cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2011; 129:2191-2200. [PMID: 21476674 PMCID: PMC3087396 DOI: 10.1121/1.3531806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2009] [Revised: 11/08/2010] [Accepted: 11/21/2010] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
The multidimensional phoneme identification model is applied to consonant confusion matrices obtained from 28 postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. This model predicts consonant matrices based on these subjects' ability to discriminate a set of postulated spectral, temporal, and amplitude speech cues as presented to them by their device. The model produced confusion matrices that matched many aspects of individual subjects' consonant matrices, including information transfer for the voicing, manner, and place features, despite individual differences in age at implantation, implant experience, device and stimulation strategy used, as well as overall consonant identification level. The model was able to match the general pattern of errors between consonants, but not the full complexity of all consonant errors made by each individual. The present study represents an important first step in developing a model that can be used to test specific hypotheses about the mechanisms cochlear implant users employ to understand speech.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario A Svirsky
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 268:27-39. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1335-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2010] [Accepted: 07/02/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
41
|
Sagi E, Meyer TA, Kaiser AR, Teoh SW, Svirsky MA. A mathematical model of vowel identification by users of cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2010; 127:1069-83. [PMID: 20136228 PMCID: PMC2830268 DOI: 10.1121/1.3277215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2009] [Revised: 11/25/2009] [Accepted: 11/30/2009] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
A simple mathematical model is presented that predicts vowel identification by cochlear implant users based on these listeners' resolving power for the mean locations of first, second, and/or third formant energies along the implanted electrode array. This psychophysically based model provides hypotheses about the mechanism cochlear implant users employ to encode and process the input auditory signal to extract information relevant for identifying steady-state vowels. Using one free parameter, the model predicts most of the patterns of vowel confusions made by users of different cochlear implant devices and stimulation strategies, and who show widely different levels of speech perception (from near chance to near perfect). Furthermore, the model can predict results from the literature, such as Skinner, et al. [(1995). Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 104, 307-311] frequency mapping study, and the general trend in the vowel results of Zeng and Galvin's [(1999). Ear Hear. 20, 60-74] studies of output electrical dynamic range reduction. The implementation of the model presented here is specific to vowel identification by cochlear implant users, but the framework of the model is more general. Computational models such as the one presented here can be useful for advancing knowledge about speech perception in hearing impaired populations, and for providing a guide for clinical research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elad Sagi
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|