The under-compensatory roll aVOR does not affect dynamic visual acuity

Are Vestibuloocular Reflex Gain and Dynamic Visual Acuity Responsible of Oscillopsia After Complete Unilateral Vestibular Loss?

BACKGROUND

Acute and complete unilateral vestibular deafferentation induces a significant change in ipsilateral vestibuloocular reflex gain, making the patient unable to stabilize gaze during active or passive head movements. This inability creates the illusion that the visual environment is moving, resulting in persistent visual discomfort during rapid angular or linear acceleration of the head. This is known as oscillopsia. Our objective was to understand if the spontaneous sensation of oscillopsias after complete unilateral vestibular deafferentation by vestibular neurotomy at 5 days (D5) and at 3 months (M3) is correlated with the loss of vestibuloocular reflex gain and dynamic visual acuity.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study was conducted in an otolaryngology tertiary care center (2019-2022) on patients with complete unilateral vestibular loss by vestibular neurotomy. They were divided into 2 groups according to the presence (group G1) or absence (group G2) of a spontaneous complaint of oscillopsia assessed at M3. Severity of oscillopsias evaluated by Oscillopsia Severity Questionnaire. Vestibuloocular reflex gain based on video head impulse test (vHIT) and the dynamic visual acuity were measured for each group at D5 and M3. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 test and quantitative variables using the nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

All patients have a complete vestibular deafferentation at D5 and M3. At D5 (G1 = 8 patients, G2 = 5 patients), there is no significant difference for ipsilateral and contralateral vestibuloocular reflex gains and dynamic visual acuity losses. The Oscillopsia Severity Questionnaire was 2.68 ± 1.03 in G1 and 1.23 ± 1.03 in G2 (P < .05). At M3 (G1 = 9 patients, G2 = 6 patients), there is no significant difference between groups for epidemiologic and clinical data and for vestibuloocular reflex and dynamic visual acuity losses. The Oscillopsia Severity Questionnaire was 2.10 ± 0.63 in G1 and 1.24 ± 0.28 in G2 (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The spontaneous disabling sensation of oscillopsia after complete unilateral vestibular loss is well assessed by the Oscillopsia Severity Questionnaire but cannot be explained by objective vestibular tests assessing vestibuloocular reflex gain (vHIT) or dynamic visual acuity loss at D5 or M3. Further studies are needed to measure the sensation of oscillopsia under real-life conditions and to identify the factors responsible for its persistence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Retinal Image Slip Must Pass the Threshold for Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation

We sought to determine whether repeated vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation training to increase the VOR gain (eye/head velocity) had a lasting effect in normal subjects and whether there was a retinal image slip tolerance threshold for VOR adaptation. We used the unilateral incremental VOR adaptation technique and horizontal active (self-generated, predictable) head impulses as the vestibular stimulus. Both active and passive (imposed, unpredictable) head impulse VOR gains were measured before and after unilateral incremental VOR adaptation training. The adapting side was pseudo-randomized for left or right. We tested ten normal subjects over one block (10 sessions over 12 days) of VOR adaptation training and testing, immediately followed by a second block (5 sessions over 19 days) of testing only without training. Our findings show robust short-term VOR adaptation of ~ 10 % immediately after each 15-min training session, but that the daily pre-adaptation gain was most different on days 1 and 2, and for subsequent training days before saturating to ~ 5 % greater than the pre-adaptation gain on day 1. This increase was partially retained for 19 days after regular training stopped. The data suggest that stable vision in normal subjects is maintained when there is < 5 % deviation in VOR gain from the original baseline, which corresponds to < 9°/s retinal image slip. Below this threshold, there is poor adaptive drive to return the gain to its original baseline value.

An Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Vestibular, Cerebellar, and Oculomotor Disorders Using a Systematized Clinical Bedside Examination

The bedside examination associated with their clinical history remains the most critical means to accurately diagnose the cause for most of the signs and symptoms related to pathology of the cerebellum and vestibular system in patients presenting with dizziness and imbalance. This paper focuses on those critical bedside examinations, suggests when laboratory testing might be useful to confirm the clinical suspicion, and considers the shared neural circuitry within the visual and vestibular systems to offer an algorithmic approach in conducting the clinical bedside examination.

Angular vestibuloocular reflex responses in Otop1 mice. II. Otolith sensor input improves compensation after unilateral labyrinthectomy

The role of the otoliths in mammals in the normal angular vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) was characterized in an accompanying study based on the Otopetrin1 (Otop1) mouse, which lacks functioning otoliths because of failure to develop otoconia but seems to have otherwise normal peripheral anatomy and neural circuitry. That study showed that otoliths do not contribute to the normal horizontal (rotation about Earth-vertical axis parallel to dorso-ventral axis) and vertical (rotation about Earth-vertical axis parallel to interaural axis) angular VOR but do affect gravity context-specific VOR adaptation. By using these animals, we sought to determine whether the otoliths play a role in the angular VOR after unilateral labyrinthectomy when the total canal signal is reduced. In five Otop1 mice and five control littermates we measured horizontal and vertical left-ear-down and right-ear-down sinusoidal VOR (0.2–10 Hz, 20–100°/s) during the early (3–5 days) and plateau (28–32 days) phases of compensation after unilateral labyrinthectomy and compared these measurements with baseline preoperative responses from the accompanying study. From similar baselines, acute gain loss was ~25% less in control mice, and chronic gain recovery was ~40% more in control mice. The acute data suggest that the otoliths contribute to the angular VOR when there is a loss of canal function. The chronic data suggest that a unilateral otolith signal can significantly improve angular VOR compensation. These data have implications for vestibular rehabilitation of patients with both canal and otolith loss and the development of vestibular implants, which currently only mimic the canals on one side.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study examining the role of the otoliths (defined here as the utricle and saccule) on the acute and chronic angular vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) after unilateral labyrinthectomy in an animal model in which the otoliths are reliably inactivated and the semicircular canals preserved. This study shows that the otolith signal is used to augment the acute angular VOR and help boost VOR compensation after peripheral injury.

Stability of the aVOR to Repeat Head Impulse Testing

OBJECTIVE

The angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) is known to be influenced by factors such as arousal and cognition during traditional vestibular function testing. However, the inherent variability of the aVOR to head impulse testing has not been explicitly examined. The purpose of this study was to determine the variability of the aVOR to active and passive head impulses using the gold standard scleral search coil method to record head and eye rotation.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Twenty six healthy control subjects agreed to active and passive horizontal head impulse testing on at least two separate sessions from two unique institutions. An additional 27 individuals with cochlear implantation (CI) underwent passive horizontal and vertical semicircular canal plane head impulse testing. Test sessions were separated from 3 to 210 days in the normal subjects and from 49 to 537 days in the subjects with CI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Reliability of the angular VOR gain (eye velocity/head velocity) over time.

RESULTS

In the healthy control subjects, there was no difference in aVOR gain between right and left ears, between session one and session two, or between active (self-generated, 0.99 ± 0.08) or passive (imposed, 1.0 ± 0.08) head impulses. In the patients, we also found the aVOR gain very stable over time. However, the aVOR gains of the patients were different across the semicircular canal planes tested (p < 0.001) with the four vertical semicircular canals having lower aVOR gains than the two horizontal canals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest the aVOR gain is quite stable when tested across unique days in healthy controls and patients with auditory-only inner ear pathology.

The bedside examination of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR): an update

Diagnosing dizzy patients remains a daunting challenge to the clinician in spite of modern imaging and increasingly sophisticated electrophysiological testing. Here we review the major bedside tests of the vestibulo-ocular reflex and how, when combined with a proper examination of the other eye movement systems, one can arrive at an accurate vestibular diagnosis.