1
|
Gosalia H, Moreno-Ajona D, Goadsby PJ. Medication-overuse headache: a narrative review. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:89. [PMID: 38816828 PMCID: PMC11140994 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01755-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Medication-overuse headache (MOH), which potentially involves 1-2% of the population, is defined as a headache, on ≥ 15 days a month affected, along with overuse of one or other acute attack medications. MOH presents with significant challenges in the headache community, particularly in clinical settings raising various questions about its pathophysiology. Through a review of the current literature and our clinical experience, we have explored the mechanisms through which MOH may occur, provide an understanding of the current state of treatment and detail some possible views on the understanding and treatment of this condition. We evaluate the variations in treatment methods offered globally and understanding of the disorder. Above all interventions, patient education is crucial, which is underscored by an analysis of the academic publications. Given the condition is preventable, early intervention is imperative and patient awareness is highlighted as key. Globally, there is no uniform treatment methodology, which may be advantageous as approaches need to take local circumstances into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helin Gosalia
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, & SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, The Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre (SPaRC), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | - David Moreno-Ajona
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, & SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, The Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre (SPaRC), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, London, UK
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, & SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, The Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre (SPaRC), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Wellcome Foundation Building, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corasaniti MT, Lawrence GW, Bagetta G, Iannacchero R, Tarsitano A, Monteleone A, Pagliaro M, Tonin P, Sandrini G, Nicotera P, Scuteri D. Combination of anti-CGRP/CGRP-R mAbs with onabotulinumtoxin A as a novel therapeutic approach for refractory chronic migraine: a retrospective study of real-world clinical evidence and a protocol for a double-blind, randomized clinical trial to establish the efficacy and safety. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1296577. [PMID: 38152694 PMCID: PMC10751376 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1296577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic migraine is a disabling neurovascular disorder that ranks amongst the top causes of years lived with disability worldwide. The duration and the frequency of migraine affect cognitive and affective domains, inducing worsening of memory, executive functions, orientation and causing anxiety. Population-based studies report a worrying level of resistance to treatments. Therefore, this study aims: 1) to assess efficacy of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed towards the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (CGRP-R) for chronic migraine resistant to current preventatives; 2) to design a clinical trial protocol to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy utilizing anti-CGRP/CGRP-R together with onabotulinumtoxin A in patients suffering from resistant chronic migraine; 3) to provide a molecular rationale for combination therapy. A controlled trial is warranted as pooled analysis of real-world data from our group highlighted that combined treatment provides ≥50% reduction vs. baseline (onabotulinumtoxin A) of monthly headache days (MHDs) in up to 58.8% of patients, but there has been only sparse application of this combined therapy to date. The mAbs chosen are: erenumab, because its combination effect with onabotulinumtoxin A improved symptoms in 65% of patients; eptinezumab, due to its faster action. The results highlight that early diagnosis of migraine improves therapeutic outcomes with mAbs alone, confirming their effectiveness and the need for an adequately powered clinical trial evaluating the safety and potential superior effectiveness of eptinezumab/erenumab and onabotulinumtoxin A together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. T. Corasaniti
- Department of Health Sciences, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - G. W. Lawrence
- Department of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - G. Bagetta
- Pharmacotechnology Documentation and Transfer Unit, Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
| | - R. Iannacchero
- Department of Neurology, Headache Center, Regional Hospital “Pugliese-Ciaccio”, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - A. Tarsitano
- Pain Therapy Center, Provincial Health Authority (ASP), Cosenza, Italy
| | - A. Monteleone
- Pharmacotechnology Documentation and Transfer Unit, Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
| | - M. Pagliaro
- Pharmacotechnology Documentation and Transfer Unit, Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
| | - P. Tonin
- Regional Center for Serious Brain Injuries, S. Anna Institute, Crotone, Italy
| | - G. Sandrini
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation Neurologic Institute, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - P. Nicotera
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - D. Scuteri
- Pharmacotechnology Documentation and Transfer Unit, Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
- Regional Center for Serious Brain Injuries, S. Anna Institute, Crotone, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ljubisavljevic S, Ljubisavljevic M, Damjanovic R, Kalinic S. A Descriptive Review of Medication-Overuse Headache: From Pathophysiology to the Comorbidities. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1408. [PMID: 37891777 PMCID: PMC10605322 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13101408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is an important problem worldwide, with different areas of controversy regarding its entity. This article reviews the risk factors, comorbidities, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, effective management, and prognosis of MOH by summarizing and integrating the results and findings from previously performed more than 15,000 studies (from 2010 to 2023) available from the scientific database of the University Medical Library in the University Clinical Center of Niš, which aimed to investigate and define the complexity of this type of headache. RECENT FINDING It has been proposed that all acute migraine medications can lead to MOH, with differences in the propensity of different agents to cause the problem. Early data suggests that triptans and other painkillers used for the acute treatment of migraine may be an exception. Recent studies show that practitioners and the general public are still largely unaware of the problem of medication overuse and its damaging effects. SUMMARY Although it is likely that MOH does occur, restricting the number of acute medications is necessary to prevent it. It is also possible that increasing amounts of acute medications are simply a reflection of poorly controlled headaches rather than a cause. Further research needs to be developed to identify more precise mechanisms for effective MOH management and its evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srdjan Ljubisavljevic
- Department for Neurology, University Clinical Centre of Nis, 18000 Nis, Serbia; (M.L.); (R.D.); (S.K.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hird MA, Sandoe CH. Medication Overuse Headache: an Updated Review and Clinical Recommendations on Management. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2023; 23:389-398. [PMID: 37271793 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-023-01278-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OVERVIEW Medication overuse headache (MOH) is highly prevalent among individuals with primary headache disorders. PURPOSE OF REVIEW (1) Provide an update on epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment strategies of MOH and (2) provide recommendations on the management of MOH. RECENT FINDINGS The prevalence of MOH ranges from 0.5 to 7.2%. Risk factors for MOH include female sex, lower socioeconomic status, some psychiatric conditions, and substance use disorders, among others. Recent large clinical trials support preventative therapy as an integral component of MOH management. Emerging clinical trial evidence supports anti-CGRP mAbs as effective preventative treatments among individuals with migraine and MOH. Among the large clinical trials, candesartan, topiramate, amitriptyline, and onabotulinumtoxinA were the most used preventative therapies, providing further support for these agents. MOH management requires a multifaceted and patient-centered approach that involves patient education, behavioral interventions, withdrawal of the overused medication, and initiation of preventative medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Hird
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Claire H Sandoe
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Centre for Headache, Women's College Hospital, 3rd Floor, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martinelli D, Pocora MM, De Icco R, Allena M, Vaghi G, Sances G, Castellazzi G, Tassorelli C. Searching for the Predictors of Response to BoNT-A in Migraine Using Machine Learning Approaches. Toxins (Basel) 2023; 15:364. [PMID: 37368665 DOI: 10.3390/toxins15060364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OnabotulinumtoxinA (BonT-A) reduces migraine frequency in a considerable portion of patients with migraine. So far, predictive characteristics of response are lacking. Here, we applied machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify clinical characteristics able to predict treatment response. We collected demographic and clinical data of patients with chronic migraine (CM) or high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) treated with BoNT-A at our clinic in the last 5 years. Patients received BoNT-A according to the PREEMPT (Phase III Research Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy) paradigm and were classified according to the monthly migraine days reduction in the 12 weeks after the fourth BoNT-A cycle, as compared to baseline. Data were used as input features to run ML algorithms. Of the 212 patients enrolled, 35 qualified as excellent responders to BoNT-A administration and 38 as nonresponders. None of the anamnestic characteristics were able to discriminate responders from nonresponders in the CM group. Nevertheless, a pattern of four features (age at onset of migraine, opioid use, anxiety subscore at the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS-a) and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score correctly predicted response in HFEM. Our findings suggest that routine anamnestic features acquired in real-life settings cannot accurately predict BoNT-A response in migraine and call for a more complex modality of patient profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Martinelli
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Magdalena Pocora
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto De Icco
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Marta Allena
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Gloria Vaghi
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Grazia Sances
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Gloria Castellazzi
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Corasaniti MT, Bagetta G, Nicotera P, Tarsitano A, Tonin P, Sandrini G, Lawrence GW, Scuteri D. Safety of Onabotulinumtoxin A in Chronic Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Toxins (Basel) 2023; 15:toxins15050332. [PMID: 37235366 DOI: 10.3390/toxins15050332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Some 14% of global prevalence, based on high-income country populations, suffers from migraine. Chronic migraine is very disabling, being characterized by at least 15 headache days per month of which at least 8 days present the features of migraine. Onabotulinumtoxin A, targeting the machinery for exocytosis of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, has been approved for use in chronic migraine since 2010. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraises the safety of onabotulinumtoxin A treatment for chronic migraine and the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in randomized, clinical studies in comparison with placebo or other comparators and preventative treatments according to the most updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 recommendations. The search retrieved 888 total records. Nine studies are included and seven were eligible for meta-analysis. The present study demonstrates that toxin produces more TRAEs than placebo, but less than oral topiramate, supporting the safety of onabotulinumtoxin A, and highlights the heterogeneity of the studies present in the literature (I2 = 96%; p < 0.00001). This points to the need for further, adequately powered, randomized clinical trials assessing the safety of onabotulinumtoxin A in combination with the newest treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giacinto Bagetta
- Pharmacotechnology Documentation and Transfer Unit, Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Nicotera
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Assunta Tarsitano
- Pain Therapy Center, Provincial Health Authority (ASP), 87100 Cosenza, Italy
| | - Paolo Tonin
- Regional Center for Serious Brain Injuries, S. Anna Institute, 88900 Crotone, Italy
| | - Giorgio Sandrini
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation Neurologic Institute, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Gary W Lawrence
- Department of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Collins Avenue, D09 V209 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Damiana Scuteri
- Pharmacotechnology Documentation and Transfer Unit, Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy
- Regional Center for Serious Brain Injuries, S. Anna Institute, 88900 Crotone, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Giri S, Tronvik E, Linde M, Pedersen SA, Hagen K. Randomized controlled studies evaluating Topiramate, Botulinum toxin type A, and mABs targeting CGRP in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231156922. [PMID: 36856015 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231156922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review focuses on chronic migraine patients with medication overuse headache using, respectively, topiramate, botulinum toxin type A, and human monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science until May 2022. We included randomized controlled trials reporting the outcomes of change in monthly headache/migraine days, ≥50% response rates and change in medication overuse status. Studies were excluded if response rates were not reported. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. The quality of evidence for outcomes across included studies was evaluated according to the five factors outlined in Cochrane GRADE approach. FINDINGS The initial search resulted in 1599 records. Following screening, 10 studies met our inclusion criteria, while seven studies with sufficient data were included in the meta-analysis. Studies assessing Botulinum toxin type A included 1139 patients and showed a mean reduction in headache frequency by 1.92 days per month compared to placebo (-1.92; 95% CI -2.68 to -1.16). Studies assessing human monoclonal antibodies included 1982 patients, and showed significant positive effect compared to placebo for all measured outcomes. The overall odds ratio for the ≥50% response rate was 2.90 (95% CI, 2.23 to 3.78). No significant difference was observed in the frequency of adverse effect for both Botulinum toxin type A and low dose of human monoclonal antibodies compared to placebo. There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the impact of topiramate in chronic migraine patients with medication overuse headache. INTERPRETATION Botulinum toxin type A and human monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor were beneficial in reducing monthly migraine days and ≥50% response rate, but uncertainties remained for Botulinum toxin type A regarding response rate. The effect size for human monoclonal antibodies was greater with relatively lower drop-out rate. High-quality randomized trials are required to evaluate the effect of topiramate in chronic migraine patients with medication overuse headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samita Giri
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,NorHEAD-Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Erling Tronvik
- NorHEAD-Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway.,Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headache, Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Mattias Linde
- NorHEAD-Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway.,Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headache, Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sindre Andre Pedersen
- The Medicine and Health Library, Library Section for Research Support, Data and Analysis, NTNU University Library, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Knut Hagen
- NorHEAD-Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinical Research Unit Central Norway, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Karaoğlan M. Three men in a boat: The comparison of the combination therapy of botulinum toxin and greater occipital nerve block with bupivacaine, with botulinum toxin monotherapy in the management of chronic migraine. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2023; 226:107609. [PMID: 36731164 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study compared the impact of the combination therapy of onabotulinum toxin A and greater occipital nerve block (GoNT-A) with onabotulinum toxin A monotherapy (BoNT-A) based on its efficacy and safety in relation to the quality of life of adult chronic migraine (CM) patients. BACKGROUND Prophylactic treatment of CM is still difficult and complex. Combination treatments do not have an evidence base yet. METHODS This retrospective study included 85 patients. For greater occipital nerve block (GONB), 4 ml of the solution prepared using 1 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 3 ml of saline on both sides were bilaterally applied to 30 patients. For BoNT-A treatment, a total of 155 units of onabotulinum toxin A (BOTOX®) was intramuscularly injected into 31 specific points around the head and neck in 27 patients. Both protocols were similarly applied to 28 patients for GoNT-A treatment. MIDAS and HIT-6 scores were evaluated to measure patients' quality of life three months after the treatment. RESULTS When MIDAS and HIT-6 score groups were statistically compared, both GONB and GoNT-A applications showed a statistically significant reduction compared to the BoNT-A application (p < 0.05). The decrease in the MIDAS and HIT-6 scores of GONB and GoNT-A applications did not show a statistical difference (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION The combination of BoNT-A and GONB was superior to BoNT-A applied as monotherapy. Alternately, no significant difference was found between GONB therapy and combination therapy in all data. Combination treatments were well tolerated.
Collapse
|
9
|
Onan D, Bentivegna E, Martelletti P. OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment in Chronic Migraine: Investigation of Its Effects on Disability, Headache and Neck Pain Intensity. Toxins (Basel) 2022; 15:29. [PMID: 36668849 PMCID: PMC9862733 DOI: 10.3390/toxins15010029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Neck disability and pain are frequently encountered problems in patients with chronic migraine (CM). The long-term stimuli of neurons in the trigeminocervical junction may explain this situation. OnabotulinumtoxinA (ONA) treatment is one of the proven treatments for CM; however, there is no study data on the efficacy of ONA treatment on neck disability and pain in CM patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of ONA treatment on disability, neck pain and headache intensity in CM patients. One hundred thirty-four patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. ONA treatment was administered at a dose of 195 U to 39 sites in total as per Follow-the-Pain PREEMPT protocol. The disability was evaluated with the Neck Disability Index and the Migraine Disability Assessment; pain intensity was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale; the monthly number of headache days were recorded; quality of life was evaluated with the Headache Impact Test. All assessments were recorded at baseline and 3 months after treatment. After the treatment, neck−migraine disabilities decreased from severe to mild for neck and moderate for migraine (p < 0.001). Neck pain and headache intensities decreased by almost half (p < 0.001). The median number of monthly headache days decreased from 20 days to 6 days (p < 0.000). The quality-of-life level decreased significantly from severe to substantial level (p < 0.001). According to our results, ONA treatment was effective in reducing neck-related problems in CM patients. Long-term follow-up results may provide researchers with more comprehensive results in terms of the treatment of chronic migraine−neck-related problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilara Onan
- Spine Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06230, Türkiye
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 000189 Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Bentivegna
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 000189 Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 000189 Rome, Italy
- Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant’Andrea Hospital, 000189 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaltseis K, Hamann T, Gaul C, Broessner G. Is prednisone still a reasonable option in the treatment of withdrawal headache in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache in the age of CGRP antibodies? A narrative review. Headache 2022; 62:1264-1271. [PMID: 36437611 PMCID: PMC10100419 DOI: 10.1111/head.14415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Along with the development of novel migraine therapies as the monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its receptor, the question arises if the treatment of chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse headache (MOH) must be reconsidered. Have previous therapeutic approaches, including glucocorticoids, lost their role in the management of this debilitating disorder? In this narrative review, we present an overview of the available treatment options in CM and MOH in light of CGRP antibodies as well as an evaluation of the role of glucocorticoids in withdrawal therapy. BACKGROUND Chronic migraine and medication overuse continues to be a difficult to treat condition. To date, potent treatment options are scarce and algorithms for advising patients with MOH are often still based on expert consensus rather than evidence-based medicine. For years and probably due to lack of effective alternatives, glucocorticoids have been used in MOH, especially to alleviate withdrawal symptoms caused by detoxification. Small case series report positive effects of steroids in this respective patient group; however, randomized controlled trials did not show a consistent benefit, although this may be due to methodological limitations. Because of these discrepancies, their role in MOH has been under debate ever since. METHODS We searched the electronic database PubMed for articles up to June 1, 2022 on the use of glucocorticoids in CM and MOH. CONCLUSION Despite popular use in clinical practice, there is currently still no scientific evidence for the efficacy of glucocorticoids in patients with CM and MOH. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies achieved high transition rates from medication overuse to non-overuse. However, further research is needed to evaluate the additional benefit of these new agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Kaltseis
- Department of Neurology, Headache Outpatient Clinic, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Till Hamann
- Department of Neurology, Headache Center North-East, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Charly Gaul
- Headache Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregor Broessner
- Department of Neurology, Headache Outpatient Clinic, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Berger AA, Winnick A, Carroll AH, Welschmeyer A, Li N, Colon M, Paladini A, Ramírez GF, Hasoon J, Cornett EM, Song J, Varrassi G, Kaye AM, Kaye AD, Ganti L. Rimegepant for the treatment of migraine. Health Psychol Res 2022; 10:38534. [PMID: 36262478 PMCID: PMC9560892 DOI: 10.52965/001c.38534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a common form of primary headache, affecting up to 1 in every 6 Americans. The pathophysiology is an intricate interplay of genetic factors and environmental influence and is still being elucidated in ongoing studies. The trigeminovascular system is now known to have a significant role in the initiation of migraines, including the release of pain mediators such as CGRP and substance P. Traditional treatment of migraine is usually divided into acute and preventive treatment. Acute therapy includes non-specific therapy, such as NSAIDs and other analgesics, which may provide relief in mild to moderate migraines. 5-HT1 agonists may provide relief in severe migraine, but are not universally effective and carry a significant side-effect profile with frequent redosing requirement. Prophylactic therapy may reduce the occurrence of acute migraine attacks in selected patients, but does not completely eliminate it. More recently, CGRP antagonism has been studied and shown to be effective in both abortion and prevention of migraine. Novel medications, targeting CGRP, divide into CGRP antibodies and receptor antagonists (gepants). Rimegepant, a second-generation gepant, has shown efficacy in several clinical trials in treating acute migraine. Ongoing trials are also evaluating its role in migraine prophylaxis, and results are promising. It is also generally safer for use than existing options, does not appear to increase the chance of developing chronic migraines, and carries a very tolerable side effects profile. It is a part of a growing arsenal in migraine treatment, and may present the silver bullet for treatment of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amnon A Berger
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School
| | - Ariel Winnick
- Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, University of California School of Optometry
| | | | | | | | - Marc Colon
- Department of Psychiatry, and Behavioral Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center Shreveport
| | | | | | - Jamal Hasoon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | | | | | | | - Adam M Kaye
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Shreveport
| | - Latha Ganti
- University of Central Florida College of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pooled Analysis of Real-World Evidence Supports Anti-CGRP mAbs and OnabotulinumtoxinA Combined Trial in Chronic Migraine. Toxins (Basel) 2022; 14:toxins14080529. [PMID: 36006191 PMCID: PMC9413678 DOI: 10.3390/toxins14080529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OnabotulinumtoxinA, targeting the CGRP machinery, has been approved for the last two decades for chronic migraine prevention. The recently approved monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed towards the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway open a new age for chronic migraine control. However, some 40% patients suffering from chronic migraine is still resistant to treatment. The aim of this work is to answer the following PICOS (participants intervention comparator outcome study design) question: Is there evidence of efficacy and safety of the combined administration of anti-CGRP mAbs and onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine? A systematic review and meta-analysis [Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 recommendations] was made up to 19 April 2022. The results are encouraging: the combined treatment proved to afford ≥50% monthly headache days (MHDs)/frequency reduction respect to baseline in up to 58.8% of patients; in comparison, anti-CGRP mAbs reduce MHDs of 1.94 days from baseline and botulinum toxin of 1.86 days. Our study demonstrates for the first time that the combination therapy of onabotulinumtoxinA with anti-CGRP mAbs affords a reduction of 2.67 MHDs with respect to onabotulinumtoxinA alone, with moderate certainty of evidence. Adequately powered, good-quality studies are needed to confirm the response to combination therapy in terms of efficacy and safety. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022313640.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bentivegna E, Luciani M, Ferrari V, Galastri S, Baldari F, Scarso F, Lamberti PA, Martelletti P. Recently approved and emerging drug options for migraine prophylaxis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1325-1335. [PMID: 35850597 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2102420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : Migraine occupies the first position regarding to the disability caused in female working population (15-49 years). Research in the field of prophylaxis of this pathology has made enormous strides in recent years. AREAS COVERED In this narrative review we retrace the most important scientific evidence regarding recently approved and emerging drug for prophylactic treatment of migraine. The purpose of this article is in fact to evaluate currently approved or emerging pharmacological agents for migraine prophylaxis. This review is based on literature published in peer review journal obtained through PubMed, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov and US FDA. EXPERT OPINION : Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide signalling pathway (CGRP) have marked an innovation in prophylactic migraine therapy. The combination of Onabotulinumtoxin-A (OBTA) and mAbs appears to be an effective, but costly, therapeutic option for resistant cases. New classes of molecules like gepants and ditans seem to give exceptional results. In addition, new prophylactic drugs are emerging with several targets: the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), ion channels, several receptors coupled to G proteins, orexin, and glutamate. All these therapies will implement and improve migraine management, as well as personalized medicine for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Bentivegna
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Valeria Ferrari
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Galastri
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Baldari
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Scarso
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Piera A Lamberti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.,Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Therapies targeting CGRP signaling for medication overuse headache. Curr Opin Neurol 2022; 35:353-359. [PMID: 35674079 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Medication overuse headache (MOH) affects more than 60 million individuals worldwide causing enormous personal and social burden. Only repurposed drugs are available for MOH that share limited evidence for efficacy. The preclinical data suggesting that activation of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway is involved in headache chronification along with clinical evidence that monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs) have good efficacy in preventing chronic migraine, triggered this review that aims to summarize the current data on the effectiveness and safety of mAbs against CGRP in MOH. RECENT FINDINGS Post hoc analyses of phase-3 trials of erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab for the prevention of chronic migraine revealed that patients with MOH benefit from the treatment over placebo. Several real-world studies confirm the efficacy of erenumab and galcanezumab in patients with MO. However, all published trials evaluated treatments in patients with chronic migraine with MO collectively, not in patients with MOH exclusively. SUMMARY The available data indicate that anti-CGRP mAbs represent a good mechanism-based and disease-specific therapeutical option with for MOH as long as detoxification and additional nonpharmaceutical interventions are operated. Future research should focus on long-term-controlled trials in MOH populations exclusively.
Collapse
|
15
|
Azimova Y, Amelin A, Alferova V, Artemenko A, Akhmadeeva L, Golovacheva V, Danilov A, Ekusheva E, Isagulian E, Koreshkina M, Kurushina O, Latysheva N, Lebedeva E, Naprienko M, Osipova V, Pavlov N, Parfenov V, Rachin A, Sergeev A, Skorobogatykh K, Tabeeva G, Filatova E. Clinical guidelines "Migraine". Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2022. [DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20221220134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
16
|
Park HK, Cho SJ. Comprehensive approach for the treatment of medication-overuse headache. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2021. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2021.64.12.843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders as a headache in patients with a pre-existing primary headache disorder that occurs on 15 or more days per month for more than 3 months. It is caused by overuse of medication for acute or symptomatic headache treatment. Regular and frequent use of acute or symptomatic medications can worsen headaches and lead to chronic headache or MOH. MOH is a burdensome medical condition that is difficult to treat, and the frequent recurrence of headaches may result in disability in individuals and impair socioeconomic outcomes.Current Concepts: Awareness of MOH and the education of patients, the general population, and healthcare providers are important for the first step of treatment. Scientific research regarding the treatment of MOH has been published in the past few years.Discussion and Conclusion: Physicians should educate and counsel patients to stop or at least reduce the intake of acute or symptomatic medications that can be discontinued abruptly or tapered slowly. During the period after the discontinuation of the overused medications, some withdrawal symptoms including headache might be manageable with bridging therapy. Evidence-based preventive therapies including anticonvulsants (topiramate and divalproex sodium), botulinum toxin A, and medications acting by antagonism of the calcitonin generelated peptide pathway might be helpful in patients with MOH for both avoiding the overused medication and preventing the relapse of overuse. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach may improve the outcomes of patients with MOH.
Collapse
|
17
|
Fenton C, Lee A. Educate patients with medication overuse headache, and intervene, when necessary. DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40267-021-00878-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
18
|
Corand V, Moisset X, Radat F, Lucas C. Medication overuse headache: Updating of the French recommendations regarding the treatments strategies. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2021; 177:760-764. [PMID: 34332779 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Regular and frequent use of analgesics and acute antimigraine drugs can increase the frequency of headache, and induce the transition from episodic to chronic migraine or medication-overuse headache (MOH). The one-year prevalence of this condition is between 1% and 2% in Europe, provoking substantial burden. MOH is more prevalent in people with comorbid depression, anxiety, and other chronic pain conditions. This paper aims at presenting an updating of French recommendations regarding treatments strategies. Prior French recommendations, published in 2014, were written in French. A literature search in the major medical databases including the terms "medication overuse headache", "symptomatic medication overuse", published between 2010 and 2020 was carried out. Three main strategies can be recommended and conducted in parallel: education and explanations about the negative consequences of overusing acute antimigraine drugs, discontinuation of the overused medication, and finally, preventive drug therapy and non-pharmacological prevention. Medication overuse headache remains a debated problem and evidence for the most effective treatment strategy is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Corand
- Centre d'Etude et de Traitement de la Douleur, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | | | - X Moisset
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Inserm U-1107, Neuro-Dol, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - F Radat
- 107, rue Judaïque, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - C Lucas
- Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, Service de Neurochirurgie, hôpital Salengro, CHU de Lille, 2, avenue Oscar Lambret, 59037 Lille cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vélez-Jiménez MK, Chiquete-Anaya E, Orta DSJ, Villarreal-Careaga J, Amaya-Sánchez LE, Collado-Ortiz MÁ, Diaz-García ML, Gudiño-Castelazo M, Hernández-Aguilar J, Juárez-Jiménez H, León-Jiménez C, Loy-Gerala MDC, Marfil-Rivera A, Antonio Martínez-Gurrola M, Martínez-Mayorga AP, Munive-Báez L, Nuñez-Orozo L, Ojeda-Chavarría MH, Partida-Medina LR, Pérez-García JC, Quiñones-Aguilar S, Reyes-Álvarez MT, Rivera-Nava SC, Torres-Oliva B, Vargas-García RD, Vargas-Méndez R, Vega-Boada F, Vega-Gaxiola SB, Villegas-Peña H, Rodriguez-Leyva I. Comprehensive management of adults with chronic migraine: Clinical practice guidelines in Mexico. CEPHALALGIA REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/25158163211033969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Migraine is a polygenic multifactorial disorder with a neuronal initiation of a cascade of neurochemical processes leading to incapacitating headaches. Headaches are generally unilateral, throbbing, 4–72 h in duration, and associated with nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and sonophobia. Chronic migraine (CM) is the presence of a headache at least 15 days per month for ≥3 months and has a high global impact on health and economy, and therapeutic guidelines are lacking. Methods: Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system, we conducted a search in MEDLINE and Cochrane to investigate the current evidence and generate recommendations of clinical practice on the identification of risk factors and treatment of CM in adults. Results: We recommend avoiding overmedication of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); ergotamine; caffeine; opioids; barbiturates; and initiating individualized prophylactic treatment with topiramate eptinezumab, galcanezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, or botulinum toxin. We highlight the necessity of managing comorbidities initially. In the acute management, we recommend NSAIDs, triptans, lasmiditan, and gepants alone or with metoclopramide if nausea or vomiting. Non-pharmacological measures include neurostimulation. Conclusions: We have identified the risk factors and treatments available for the management of CM based on a grading system, which facilitates selection for individualized management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erwin Chiquete-Anaya
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, México
| | - Daniel San Juan Orta
- Department of Clinical Research of the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Dr. Manuel Velazco Suárez”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Luis Enrique Amaya-Sánchez
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional SXXI Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Miguel Ángel Collado-Ortiz
- Staff physician of the hospital and the Neurological Center ABC (The American British Cowdray Hospital IAP, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Juan Hernández-Aguilar
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Infantil de México. Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Carolina León-Jiménez
- Department of Neurology, ISSSTE Regional Hospital, “Dr. Valentin Gomez Farías”, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
| | | | - Alejandro Marfil-Rivera
- Headache and Chronic Pain Clinic, Neurology Service, Hospital Univrsitario Autónoma de Nuevo Leon, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Adriana Patricia Martínez-Mayorga
- Department of Neurology, Central Hospital “Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto”, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi, SLP, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Lilia Nuñez-Orozo
- Department of Neurology, National Medical Center 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Luis Roberto Partida-Medina
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Medico Nacional de Occidente, IMSS, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Felipe Vega-Boada
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, México
| | | | - Hilda Villegas-Peña
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Clínica de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Ildefonso Rodriguez-Leyva
- Department of Neurology, Central Hospital “Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto”, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi, SLP, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen YY, Ye XQ, Tang TC, She TW, Chen M, Zheng H. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies Versus Botulinum Neurotoxin a in the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: An Adjusted Indirect Treatment Comparison Meta-Analysis. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:671845. [PMID: 34093199 PMCID: PMC8170150 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.671845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) are new agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Comparison between CGRPmAbs and previously approved Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) will inform optimal preventive treatment of chronic migraine, but head-to-head trials are lacking. We therefore aimed to perform adjusted indirect comparison between CGRPmAbs and BoNT-A through a meta-analysis. Methods: OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, clinical registries, and government websites were searched from inception to September 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing CGRPmAbs or BoNT-A with placebo in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine were included. The primary outcomes were headache days and migraine days measured at week 12. Data were synthesized by using a frequentist approach; and the treatments were ranked by P-score. Results: We included 10 trials (n = 4,678) after screening 1049 candidates. Six trials were with low risk of bias. Fremanezumab had an effect similar to BoNT-A in the reduction of headache days at week 12 (standard mean difference [SMD] 0.08, 95%CI -0.55 to -0.7). Galcanezumab reduced more migraine days than BoNT-A at week 12 (SMD, -0.94, 95%CI −1.24 to −0.63); fremanezumab showed similar findings (SMD, −0.55, 95%CI −0.85 to −0.24). Galcanezumab and fremanezumab had better effect in mitigating headache impact at week 12. CGRPmAbs and BoNT-A had similar adverse event rate. Conclusion: CGRPmAbs and BoNT-A had similar effect in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. BoNT-A might be preferentially selected owing to its cost-effectiveness profiles. Further studies with direct comparison of the two treatments are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Yao Chen
- The Third Hospital/Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiao-Qian Ye
- The Rehabilitation College, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Tai-Chun Tang
- Chinese and Western Medicine Department of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Tian-Wei She
- Chinese and Western Medicine Department of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Min Chen
- Clinical Medicine School, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Hui Zheng
- The Third Hospital/Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lu J, Zhang Q, Guo X, Liu W, Xu C, Hu X, Ni J, Lu H, Zhao H. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:631204. [PMID: 34012392 PMCID: PMC8126691 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.631204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The previously approved botulinum toxin and nowadays promising calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody have shown efficacy for preventing chronic migraine (CM). However, there is no direct evidence for their relative effectiveness and safety. In this study, we conducted an indirect treatment comparison to compare the efficacy and safety of CGRP monoclonal antibody with botulinum toxin for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Methods: Up to August 31, 2020, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central). Weighted mean difference (WMD) and relative risk (RR) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Indirect treatment comparison (ITC) software was used to conduct indirect treatment comparison. Results: Ten studies were pooled with 6,325 patients in our meta-analysis. Both botulinum toxin and CGRP monoclonal antibody demonstrated favorable efficacy in the change of migraine days, headache days, HIT-6 score, and 50% migraine responder rate compared with placebo. In indirect treatment comparison, CGRP monoclonal antibody was superior to botulinum toxin in the frequency of acute analgesics intake (WMD = −1.31, 95% CI: −3.394 to 0.774, p = 0.02113), the rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (RR = 0.664, 95% CI: 0.469 to 0.939, p = 0.04047), and the rate of treatment-related serious adverse events (RR = 0.505, 95% CI: 0.005 to 46.98, p < 0.001). Conclusion: For chronic migraine patients, CGRP monoclonal antibody was slightly better than botulinum toxin in terms of efficacy and safety. In the future, head-to-head trials would be better to evaluate the efficacy and safety between different medications in the prevention of chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiajie Lu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Quanquan Zhang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xiaoning Guo
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Chunyang Xu
- Department of Neurology, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Kunshan, China
| | - Xiaowei Hu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jianqiang Ni
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Haifeng Lu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Hongru Zhao
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zheng H, Huang S, Chen Y, Tang T, Qin D, Chen M. Topiramate, acupuncture, and BoNT-A for chronic migraine: a network meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand 2021; 143:558-568. [PMID: 33393102 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) was the primary choice for preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Topiramate and acupuncture showed promising effect for chronic migraine, but their effectiveness relative to BoNT-A was rarely studied. We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and acceptability between topiramate, acupuncture, and BoNT-A. METHODS We searched OVID Medline, Embase, the Cochrane register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared topiramate, acupuncture, and BoNT-A with any of them or placebo in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. A network meta-analysis was performed by using a frequentist approach and a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were reduction in monthly headache days and monthly migraine days at week 12. Acceptability was defined as the number of dropouts owing to adverse events. RESULTS We included 15 RCTs (n = 2545). Eleven RCTs were at low risk of bias. The network meta-analyses (n = 2061) showed that acupuncture (2061 participants; standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.61, 95% CI: -2.35 to -0.87) and topiramate (582 participants; SMD -0.4, 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.04) ranked the most effective in the reduction of monthly headache days and migraine days, respectively; but they were not significantly superior over BoNT-A. Topiramate caused the most treatment-related adverse events and the highest rate of dropouts owing to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Topiramate and acupuncture were not superior over BoNT-A; BoNT-A was still the primary preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Large-scale RCTs with direct comparison of these three treatments are warranted to verified the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Zheng
- The Third Hospital/Acupuncture and Tuina School Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu China
| | - Shi‐Le Huang
- Clinical Medicinal School Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu China
| | - Yao‐Yao Chen
- The Third Hospital/Acupuncture and Tuina School Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu China
| | - Tai‐Chun Tang
- Clinical Medicinal School Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu China
| | - Di Qin
- The Third Hospital/Acupuncture and Tuina School Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu China
| | - Min Chen
- Clinical Medicinal School Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affatato O, Moulin TC, Pisanu C, Babasieva VS, Russo M, Aydinlar EI, Torelli P, Chubarev VN, Tarasov VV, Schiöth HB, Mwinyi J. High efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in patients with comorbid migraine and depression: a meta-analysis. J Transl Med 2021; 19:133. [PMID: 33789668 PMCID: PMC8011097 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-02801-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine and depression are highly prevalent and partly overlapping disorders that cause strong limitations in daily life. Patients tend to respond poorly to the therapies available for these diseases. OnabotulinumtoxinA has been proven to be an effective treatment for both migraine and depression. While many studies have addressed the effect of onabotulinumtoxinA in migraine or depression separately, a growing body of evidence suggests beneficial effects also for patients comorbid with migraine and depression. The current meta-analysis systematically investigates to what extent onabotulinumtoxinA is efficient in migraineurs with depression. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed based on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from the earliest date till October [Formula: see text], 2020. Mean, standard deviation (SD) and sample size have been used to evaluate improvement in depressive symptoms and migraine using random-effects empirical Bayes model. RESULTS Our search retrieved 259 studies, eight of which met the inclusion criteria. OnabotulinumtoxinA injections administered to patients with both chronic migraine and major depressive disorder led to mean reduction of [Formula: see text] points (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) in the BDI scale, of [Formula: see text] points (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) in the BDI-II scale and of [Formula: see text] points (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) in the PHQ-9 scale, when evaluating depressive symptoms. In the case of the migraine-related symptoms, we found mean reductions of [Formula: see text] (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) points in the HIT6 scale, [Formula: see text] (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) in the MIDAS scale, [Formula: see text] (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) points in the VAS scale and of [Formula: see text] (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) migraine episodes per month. Comorbid patients showed slightly better improvements in BDI, HIT6 scores and migraine frequency compared to monomorbid patients. The latter group manifested better results in MIDAS and VAS scores. CONCLUSION Treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA leads to a significant reduction of disease severity of both chronic migraine and major depressive disorder in patients comorbid with both diseases. Comparative analyses suggest an equivalent strong effect in monomorbid and comorbid patients, with beneficial effects specifically seen for certain migraine features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oreste Affatato
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Thiago C Moulin
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Claudia Pisanu
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Victoria S Babasieva
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marco Russo
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Elif I Aydinlar
- Department of Neurology, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Paola Torelli
- Headache Centre, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Vladimir N Chubarev
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vadim V Tarasov
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Institute for Translational Medicine and Biothechnology, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Helgi B Schiöth
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.,Institute for Translational Medicine and Biothechnology, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Jessica Mwinyi
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Berger AA, Winnick A, Popovsky D, Kaneb A, Berardino K, Kaye AM, Cornett EM, Kaye AD, Viswanath O, Urits I. Lasmiditan for the Treatment of Migraines With or Without Aura in Adults. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY BULLETIN 2020; 50:163-188. [PMID: 33633424 PMCID: PMC7901123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Migraines are a common form of primary headache, affecting women more than men (17.4% and 5.7% of US population, respectively, a total of 12%) that carry significant morbidity and disability, as well as a hefty healthcare price tag. They are most prevalent in women of reproductive ages and are estimated to be the 6th disease in order of causing global burden. They are estimated to cause 45.1 million years lived with disability, or 2.9% of global years lost to disability. Migraine treatment divides into acute, abortive treatment for relief of an ongoing migraine attack, and prophylactic therapy to reduce the occurrence of migraines, specifically for patients suffering from chronic and frequent episodic migraines. Traditional abortive treatment usually begins with NSAID and non-specific analgesics that are effective in curbing mild to moderate attacks. 5HT1-agonists, such as triptans, are often used for second-line and for severe attacks. Triptans are generally better tolerated in the longterm than NSAIDs and other analgesics, though they carry a significant side-effect profile and are contraindicated in large parts of the population. Prophylactic therapy is usually reserved for patients with frequent recurrence owing to medication side effects and overall poor adherence to the medication schedule. Importantly, medication overuse may actually lead to the development of chronic migraines from previously episodic attacks. Recent research has shed more light on the pathophysiology of migraine and the role of CGRP in the trigeminovascular system. Recent pharmacological advances were made in developing more specific drugs based on this knowledge, including CGRP neutralizing antibodies, receptor antagonists, and the development of ditans. These novel drugs are highly specific to peripheral and central 5-HT1F receptors and effective in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Binding these receptors reduces the production of CGRP and Glutamate, two important ligands in the nociceptive stimulus involved with the generation and propagation of migraines. Several large clinical studies showed Lasmiditan to be effective in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Importantly, due to its receptor specificity, it lacks the vasoconstriction that is associated with triptans and is thus safer is larger parts of the population, specifically in patients with cardiac and vascular disease. Though more research is required, specifically with aftermarket surveillance to elucidate rare potential side effects, Lasmiditan is a targeted anti-migraine drug that is both safe and effective, and carries an overall superior therapeutic profile to its predecessors. It joins the array of medications that target CGRP signaling, such as gepants and CGRP-antibodies, to establish a new line of care for this common disabling condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amnon A Berger
- Berger, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Winnick, MA, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Popovsky, MS, Kaneb, BA, Berardino, BS, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC. Kaye, Pharm D, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA. Cornett, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Kaye, MD, PhD, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Viswanath, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE. Urits, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ariel Winnick
- Berger, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Winnick, MA, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Popovsky, MS, Kaneb, BA, Berardino, BS, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC. Kaye, Pharm D, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA. Cornett, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Kaye, MD, PhD, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Viswanath, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE. Urits, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel Popovsky
- Berger, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Winnick, MA, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Popovsky, MS, Kaneb, BA, Berardino, BS, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC. Kaye, Pharm D, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA. Cornett, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Kaye, MD, PhD, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Viswanath, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE. Urits, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alicia Kaneb
- Berger, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Winnick, MA, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Popovsky, MS, Kaneb, BA, Berardino, BS, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC. Kaye, Pharm D, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA. Cornett, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Kaye, MD, PhD, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Viswanath, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE. Urits, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kevin Berardino
- Berger, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Winnick, MA, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Popovsky, MS, Kaneb, BA, Berardino, BS, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC. Kaye, Pharm D, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA. Cornett, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Kaye, MD, PhD, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Viswanath, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE. Urits, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Adam M Kaye
- Berger, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Winnick, MA, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Popovsky, MS, Kaneb, BA, Berardino, BS, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC. Kaye, Pharm D, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA. Cornett, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Kaye, MD, PhD, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Viswanath, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE. Urits, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Elyse M Cornett
- Berger, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Winnick, MA, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Popovsky, MS, Kaneb, BA, Berardino, BS, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC. Kaye, Pharm D, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA. Cornett, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Kaye, MD, PhD, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Viswanath, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE. Urits, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Berger, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Winnick, MA, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Popovsky, MS, Kaneb, BA, Berardino, BS, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC. Kaye, Pharm D, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA. Cornett, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Kaye, MD, PhD, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Viswanath, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE. Urits, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Berger, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Winnick, MA, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Popovsky, MS, Kaneb, BA, Berardino, BS, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC. Kaye, Pharm D, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA. Cornett, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Kaye, MD, PhD, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Viswanath, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE. Urits, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ivan Urits
- Berger, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Winnick, MA, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Popovsky, MS, Kaneb, BA, Berardino, BS, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC. Kaye, Pharm D, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA. Cornett, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Kaye, MD, PhD, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA. Viswanath, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE. Urits, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Filatova EG, Osipova VV, Tabeeva GR, Parfenov VA, Ekusheva EV, Azimova YE, Latysheva NV, Naprienko MV, Skorobogatykh KV, Sergeev AV, Golovacheva VA, Lebedeva ER, Artyomenko AR, Kurushina OV, Koreshkina MI, Amelin AV, Akhmadeeva LR, Rachin AR, Isagulyan ED, Danilov AB, Gekht AB. Diagnosis and treatment of migraine: Russian experts' recommendations. NEUROLOGY, NEUROPSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOSOMATICS 2020. [DOI: 10.14412/2074-2711-2020-4-4-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is one of the most common types of headache, which can lead to a significant decrease in quality of life. Researchers identify migraine with aura, migraine without aura, and chronic migraine that substantially reduces the ability of patients to work and is frequently concurrent with mental disorders and drug-induced headache. The complications of migraine include status migrainosus, persistent aura without infarction, migrainous infarction (stroke), and a migraine aura-induced seizure. The diagnosis of migraine is based on complaints, past medical history, objective examination data, and the diagnostic criteria as laid down in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3 rd edition. Add-on trials are recommended only in the presence of red flags, such as the symptoms warning about the secondary nature of headache. Migraine treatment is aimed at reducing the frequency and intensity of attacks and the amount of analgesics taken. It includes three main approaches: behavioral therapy, seizure relief therapy, and preventive therapy. Behavioral therapy focuses on lifestyle modification. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, simple and combined analgesics, triptans, and antiemetic drugs for severe nausea or vomiting are recommended for seizure relief. Preventive therapy which includes antidepressants, anticonvulsants, beta-blockers, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex and monoclonal antibodies to calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptors, is indicated for frequent or severe migraine attacks and for chronic migraine. Pharmacotherapy is recommended to be combined with non-drug methods that involves cognitive behavioral therapy; progressive muscle relaxation; mindfulness; biofeedback; post-isometric relaxation; acupuncture; therapeutic exercises; greater occipital nerve block; non-invasive high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; external stimulation of first trigeminal branch; and electrical stimulation of the occipital nerves (neurostimulation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. G. Filatova
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - V. V. Osipova
- Z.P. Solovyev Research and Practical Center of Psychoneurology, Moscow Healthcare Department; University Headache Clinic
| | - G. R. Tabeeva
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - V. A. Parfenov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - E. V. Ekusheva
- Academy of Postgraduate Education «Federal Research and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Care Types and Medical Technologies, Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia»
| | | | - N. V. Latysheva
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - M. V. Naprienko
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | | | - A. V. Sergeev
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - V. A. Golovacheva
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - E. R. Lebedeva
- Ural State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - A. R. Artyomenko
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - O. V. Kurushina
- Volgograd State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
| | | | - A. V. Amelin
- Acad. I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
| | | | - A. R. Rachin
- National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology, Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - E. D. Isagulyan
- Academician N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery
| | - Al. B. Danilov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - A. B. Gekht
- Z.P. Solovyev Research and Practical Center of Psychoneurology, Moscow Healthcare Department
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Quintas S, García-Azorín D, Heredia P, Talavera B, Gago-Veiga AB, Guerrero ÁL. Wearing Off Response to OnabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine: Analysis in a Series of 193 Patients. PAIN MEDICINE 2020; 20:1815-1821. [PMID: 30657951 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Long-term real-life studies have supported a cumulative effect of OnabotulinumtoxinA (OnabotA) for the prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine (CM) during consecutive cycles, and individual adaptations have been described to improve clinical response. METHODS This was a cohort longitudinal retrospective study of consecutive adult patients from the Headache Unit of the Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid and the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (Madrid) on OnabotA treatment for chronic migraine from May 2012 to December 2017. All patients were followed for 24 weeks. Full-length response to OnabotA was defined as ≥50% reduction in headache days for at least 12 weeks, and wearing off response was defined as a clinical response but with duration shorter than 10 weeks. We have analyzed the incidence and clinical predictors of this wearing off response. RESULTS A total of 193 patients were included, of whom 91 (47.1%) were considered full-length responders and 45 (23.3%) wearing off responders. No statistically significant clinical predictors (including demographic variables and baseline headache characteristics) of full-length response or wearing off response were detected in our study. An increase in dose during the second treatment cycle was attempted in 68.9% of the wearing off patients, achieving a longer duration of response of up to 12 weeks in 74.2%. CONCLUSIONS Wearing off response to OnabotA during the first treatment cycle is not uncommon in patients with CM. Increasing the dose in subsequent cycles could improve clinical response, but further multicenter long-term studies are needed to establish predictors and solutions to this problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Quintas
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - David García-Azorín
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Patricia Heredia
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Blanca Talavera
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel L Guerrero
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain.,Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Iron Deposits in Periaqueductal Gray Matter Are Associated with Poor Response to OnabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine. Toxins (Basel) 2020; 12:toxins12080479. [PMID: 32731573 PMCID: PMC7472356 DOI: 10.3390/toxins12080479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have reported increased brain deposits of iron in patients with chronic migraine (CM). This study aims to determine the relation between iron deposits and outcome after treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA (OnabotA). Demographic and clinical data were collected for this study through a prospective cohort study including 62 CM patients treated with OnabotA in the Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Demographic and clinical variables were registered. Selected biomarkers in plasma during interictal periods (calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pentraxin-3 (PTX3)) and neuroimaging changes (iron deposits in the red nucleus (RN), substantia nigra (SN), globus pallidus (GP), and periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), and white matter lesions (WML)) were determined. Subjects were classified in responders (≥50% reduction in headache days) or non-responders (<50%). Responders to treatment were younger (mean age difference = 12.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.4–18.9, p = 0.001), showed higher serum levels of CGRP (≥50 ng/mL) and PTX3 (≥1000 pg/mL) and smaller iron deposits in the GP and PAG (mean difference = 805.0; 95% CI: 37.9–1572.1 μL, p = 0.040 and mean difference = 69.8; 95% CI: 31.0–108.6 μL, p = 0.008; respectively). Differences in PAG iron deposits remained significant after adjusting for age (mean difference = 65.7; 95% CI: 22.8–108.6 μL, p = 0.003) and were associated with poor response to OnabotA after adjustment for clinical and biochemical variables (odds ratio (OR) = 0.963; 95% CI: 0.927–0.997, p = 0.041). We conclude that larger PAG iron deposits are associated with poor response to OnabotA in CM.
Collapse
|
28
|
Urits I, Clark G, An D, Wesp B, Zhou R, Amgalan A, Berger AA, Kassem H, Ngo AL, Kaye AD, Kaye RJ, Cornett EM, Viswanath O. An Evidence-Based Review of Fremanezumab for the Treatment of Migraine. Pain Ther 2020; 9:195-215. [PMID: 32222952 PMCID: PMC7203396 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-020-00159-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine headache is a common, chronic, debilitating disease with a complex etiology. Current therapy for migraine headache comprises either treatments targeting acute migraine pain or prophylactic therapy aimed at increasing the length of time between migraine episodes. Recent evidence suggests that calcium gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a critical component in the pathogenesis of migraines. Fremanezumab, a monoclonal antibody against CGRP, was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after multiple studies showed that it was well-tolerated, safe, and effective in the treatment of migraines. Further research is needed to elucidate the long-term effects of fremanezumab and CGRP-antagonists in general, and additional data is required in less healthy patients to estimate its effects in these populations and potentially increase the eligible group of recipients. This is a comprehensive review of the current literature on the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for the treatment of chronic migraine. In this review we provide an update on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and current treatment of migraine, and summarize the evidence for fremanezumab as a treatment for migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Urits
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Gavin Clark
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Daniel An
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Bredan Wesp
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rebecca Zhou
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Amnon A Berger
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hisham Kassem
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Anh L Ngo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pain Medicine, Pain Specialty Group, Newington, NH, USA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Rachel J Kaye
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Elyse M Cornett
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Valley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Krymchantowski AV, Jevoux CC, Krymchantowski AG, Vivas RS, Silva-Néto R. Medication overuse headache: an overview of clinical aspects, mechanisms, and treatments. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 20:591-600. [PMID: 32463304 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1770084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a common debilitating neurological disorder, with a prevalence of 1% to 7% in general population. It affects more than 60 million people worldwide and provokes substantial burden. Despite that, most practitioners don't know MOH. This review aims at presenting MOH clinical features, pathophysiology insights, and recent knowledge and guidance regarding treatments. AREAS COVERED A literature search in the major medical databases including the terms 'medication overuse headache,' 'chronic daily headache,' 'chronic migraine,' 'symptomatic medication overuse' and others, published between 1990 and 2020, was carried out. EXPERT COMMENTARY Primary headache sufferers such as migraineurs and tension-type headache patients may increase the headache frequency and induce the transition from episodic to chronic forms, as well as develop MOH, in the presence of medication overuse. There is evidence of structural and functional changes in some areas of the brain, which may identify those likely to respond or not to treatments. Despite the geographical differences and lack of consensus regarding approaches, to educate the patients about reducing medication intake, to withdraw overused medications and to start prophylaxis in some sufferers are crucial steps. Emerging treatments as monoclonal antibodies to migraine may result in better adherence and tolerability profiles as well as outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Raimundo Silva-Néto
- Department of Neurology, Universidade Federal do Delta do Parnaíba , Piauí, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Diener HC, Antonaci F, Braschinsky M, Evers S, Jensen R, Lainez M, Kristoffersen ES, Tassorelli C, Ryliskiene K, Petersen JA. European Academy of Neurology guideline on the management of medication‐overuse headache. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27:1102-1116. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.14268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H. C. Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology Faculty of Medicine University Duisburg‐Essen Essen Germany
| | - F. Antonaci
- IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation Pavia Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Italy
| | - M. Braschinsky
- Headache Clinic Neurology Clinic Tartu University Hospital Tartu Estonia
| | - S. Evers
- Faculty of Medicine University of Münster MünsterGermany
- Krankenhaus Lindenbrunn Coppenbrügge Germany
| | - R. Jensen
- Danish Headache Center Neurological Clinic Rigshospitalet‐Glostrup University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - M. Lainez
- Department of Neurology Hospital Clínico Universitario ValenciaSpain
- Department of Neurology Universidad Católica de Valencia Valencia Spain
| | - E. S. Kristoffersen
- Department of Neurology Akershus University Hospital OsloNorway
- Department of General Practice University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - C. Tassorelli
- IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation Pavia Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Italy
| | - K. Ryliskiene
- Department of Neurology Institute of Clinical Medicine Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
| | - J. A. Petersen
- Department Of Neurology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vandenbussche N, Paemeleire K, Katsarava Z. The Many Faces of Medication-Overuse Headache in Clinical Practice. Headache 2020; 60:1021-1036. [PMID: 32232847 DOI: 10.1111/head.13785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The management of medication-overuse headache (MOH) is multifaceted and headache experts have different views on the optimal strategy to tackle this type of secondary headache. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the literature on the management of MOH, and to highlight important considerations in the clinical evaluation of the MOH patient. Managing MOH in clinical practice starts by evaluating the headache patient with medication overuse, determining the overused drug(s), assessing the impact of headaches on the patient and assessing comorbid conditions and disorders. Withdrawal of the overused medication is the cornerstone of treatment. An inpatient or outpatient setting is chosen based on the clinical profile of the patient. There is evidence for abrupt withdrawal combined with headache preventive treatment. Bridging therapy to bring relief to withdrawal headaches and/or symptoms should be offered. Education and motivational work through multidisciplinary assessment show benefits in sustaining withdrawal and preventing relapse. Although the reversal of chronic headache after cessation of overused acute medication has been noticed worldwide, different aspects of the management of MOH, such as complete or gradual withdrawal, or preventive treatment with or without withdrawal are still debated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Zaza Katsarava
- Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Evangelical Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany.,EVEX Medical Corporation, Tbilisi, GA, USA.,Sechenov University Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yuan H, Silberstein SD. The Use of Botulinum Toxin in the Management of Headache Disorders. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2020; 263:227-249. [PMID: 32562057 DOI: 10.1007/164_2020_365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Tremendous progress has been made in the past decades for the treatment of headache disorders. Chronic migraine is the most disabling type of headache and requires the use of acute and preventive medications, many of which are associated with adverse events that limit patient adherence. Botulinum toxin (BoNT) serotype A, a neurotoxin derived from certain strains of Clostridium, disrupts neuropeptide secretion and receptor translocation related to trigeminal nociception, thereby preventing pain sensitization through peripheral and possibly central mechanisms. Ever since the first randomized controlled trial on onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) for migraine was published two decades ago, onabotA has been the only BoNT formulation approved for use in the prevention of chronic migraine. Superior tolerability and efficacy have been demonstrated on multiple migraine endpoints in many controlled trials and real-life studies. OnabotA is a safe and efficacious treatment for chronic migraine and possibly high-frequency episodic migraine. Further research is still needed to understand its mechanism of action to fully develop its therapeutic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mechanisms of Botulinum Toxin Type A Action on Pain. Toxins (Basel) 2019; 11:toxins11080459. [PMID: 31387301 PMCID: PMC6723487 DOI: 10.3390/toxins11080459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Already a well-established treatment for different autonomic and movement disorders, the use of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) in pain conditions is now continuously expanding. Currently, the only approved use of BoNT/A in relation to pain is the treatment of chronic migraines. However, controlled clinical studies show promising results in neuropathic and other chronic pain disorders. In comparison with other conventional and non-conventional analgesic drugs, the greatest advantages of BoNT/A use are its sustained effect after a single application and its safety. Its efficacy in certain therapy-resistant pain conditions is of special importance. Novel results in recent years has led to a better understanding of its actions, although further experimental and clinical research is warranted. Here, we summarize the effects contributing to these advantageous properties of BoNT/A in pain therapy, specific actions along the nociceptive pathway, consequences of its central activities, the molecular mechanisms of actions in neurons, and general pharmacokinetic parameters.
Collapse
|
34
|
Mimeh H, Fenech Magrin AM, Myers S, Ghanem AM. A Critical Review of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Prophylactic Treatment of Chronic Migraine in Adults. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39:898-907. [PMID: 30184084 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjy224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a severe, disabling condition, ranked by World Health Organization as the sixth highest cause of disability worldwide. It greatly affects patients' quality of life, functionality, and physical and mental health. The financial burden of migraine on the UK economy is conservatively estimated at £3.42 billion per year. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to perform an evidence-based literature review of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (onaBoNTA) in the prophylactic treatment of adult patients suffering with chronic migraine (CM) compared to placebo. After the best evidence is identified, it will be utilized to formulate a protocol for doctors managing CM in their aesthetic clinic. METHODS A comprehensive search of the current literature on the topic was performed by H.M. using Pubmed MEDLINE electronic database on March 1, 2018. All articles up to and inclusive of this date were included. Articles were limited to human studies and those in the English language. In vitro and animal studies were excluded. RESULTS A total of 260 articles were identified. Of these, the excellent-quality, high-strength (level 1A) trials were short-listed to answer the research question. CONCLUSIONS There is high-quality, level 1A evidence to support onaBoNTA treatment in adults with CM is well tolerated and considered safe. However, it is associated with increased risk of adverse events and still some uncertainty exists associated with the degree onaBoNTA improves outcome measures compared to placebo. These data have been used to formulate The London Aesthetic Migraine Protocol (LAMP) to provide safe, evidence-based guidance for appropriately trained and experienced aesthetic practitioners to manage CM in their aesthetic clinics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Simon Myers
- Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Ali M Ghanem
- Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schiano di Cola F, Caratozzolo S, Liberini P, Rao R, Padovani A. Response Predictors in Chronic Migraine: Medication Overuse and Depressive Symptoms Negatively Impact Onabotulinumtoxin-A Treatment. Front Neurol 2019; 10:678. [PMID: 31354606 PMCID: PMC6635602 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite numerous studies that have investigated clinical, radiological, and biochemical response predictors, the clinical profile of those patients who might benefit from OnabotulinumtoxinA is still missing. The aim of the present study was to identify potential OnabotulinumtoxinA response predictors among several clinical characteristics and confirm OnabotulinumtoxinA efficacy and safety in chronic migraine (CM) prevention. Methods: The study was conducted at the Headache Center—Neurology Clinic—Spedali Civili Hospital of Brescia. Eighty-four consecutive CM patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 48 years (SD 9.7) and a mean disease duration of 10.1 years (SD 6.6). The mean reported headache-days frequency was 22.5 (SD 5.9) per month, while the mean number of severe headache-days was 15.2 (SD 8.9) with a mean monthly medication intake of 33.2 (SD 5.6). The clinical characteristics analyzed as potential response predictors were: gender, disease duration, migraine characteristics (location, side constancy, unilateral autonomic and neurovegetative symptoms), previous prophylactic treatments, add-on therapies, withdrawal therapies, psychiatric (anxiety and depression symptoms) comorbidities and medication overuse. Results: A significant reduction from baseline to 3, 6, 9, and 12 month treatment cycles in total headache days, high intensity headache days and triptans consumption per month was found. Depressive symptoms and medication overuse negatively predicted OnabotulinumtoxinA outcome. Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA in CM. Depressive comorbidity and medication overuse, among all clinical variables, were the only significant response predictors. Such findings provide interesting insights regarding patients selection for OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment as, with the introduction of anti calcitonin gene-related (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies, clinicians will have to thoroughly judge and tailor among the many available therapeutic options now available. Future research might be needed to confirm our findings, in particular for its therapeutic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Schiano di Cola
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Renata Rao
- Neurology Unit, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Medication-overuse headache is defined as headache occurring on more than 15days in a month in people with pre-existing primary headache, and developing as a consequence of regular overuse of acute headache treatments. Medication-overuse headache is common in general neurology clinics and can be difficult to manage. Most patients have a background of migraine, which has slowly transformed over months and years from the episodic to chronic form; with this comes an increased use of acute migraine treatment. This paper identifies who is at risk of developing medication-overuse headache, and reviews preventive measures and current treatment strategies.
Collapse
|
37
|
García-Azorín D, Trigo-López J, Sierra Á, Blanco-García L, Martínez-Pías E, Martínez B, Talavera B, Guerrero ÁL. Observational, open-label, non-randomized study on the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of nummular headache: The pre-numabot study. Cephalalgia 2019; 39:1818-1826. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102419863023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Nummular headache is a primary headache characterised by superficial, coin-shaped pain. Superficial sensory fibre dysfunction might be involved in its pathophysiology. Considering the mechanism of action of onabotulinumtoxinA, it could be a reasonable option in treatment of nummular headache. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA in a series of nummular headache patients. Patients and methods This was an observational, prospective, non-randomized and open-label study. Nummular headache patients with at least 10 headache days in three preceding months were included. They were administered 25 units of onabotulinumtoxinA. The primary endpoint was the decrease of headache days per month, evaluated between weeks 20 to 24, compared with baseline. The secondary endpoints included reduction of intense headache days and acute treatment days evaluated between weeks 20–24 and weeks 8–12, compared with baseline. The 30%, 50% and 75% responder rates were determined, and tolerability described. Results We included 53 patients, 67.9% females, with a median age of 54 years. Preventive treatment had been used previously in 60.4% of patients. The median diameter of the nummular headache was 5 cm. At baseline, the number of headache days per month was 24.5 (7.3); the number of intense headache days was 12.5 (10.1), and the number of acute treatment days was 12.8 (7.8). After onabotulinumtoxinA, the mean number of headache days per month decreased to 6.9 (9.3) between weeks 20 and 24 ( p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints concerning intense headache days per month and acute treatment days per month were also statistically significant ( p < 0.001). The 50% responder rate, evaluated between weeks 20 and 24, was 77.4% and the 75% responder rate was 52.8%. Concerning tolerability, 26 patients (49.1%) experienced an adverse event (AE), the commonest being injection-site pain in 12 cases (22.6%). There were no moderate or severe AEs. Conclusion It was found that after injecting onabotulinumtoxinA, the number of headache days per month was reduced in nummular headache patients. The number of intense headache days per month and acute treatment days were also lowered. No serious adverse events occurred during treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David García-Azorín
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Javier Trigo-López
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Álvaro Sierra
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Enrique Martínez-Pías
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Blanca Martínez
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Blanca Talavera
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ángel L Guerrero
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
- Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gago-Veiga A, Santos-Lasaosa S, Cuadrado M, Guerrero Á, Irimia P, Láinez J, Leira R, Pascual J, Sanchez del Río M, Viguera J, Pozo-Rosich P. Evidence and experience with onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: Recommendations for daily clinical practice. NEUROLOGÍA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2019.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
39
|
OnabotulinumtoxinA Reduces Temporal Pain Processing at Spinal Level in Patients with Lower Limb Spasticity. Toxins (Basel) 2019; 11:toxins11060359. [PMID: 31226803 PMCID: PMC6628414 DOI: 10.3390/toxins11060359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Spasticity is a muscle tone disorder associated with different neurological conditions. Spasticity could be associated with pain, high disability, poor functional recovery, and reduced quality of life. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is considered a first-line treatment for spasticity and, more recently, it also represents a therapeutic option for various chronic pain conditions. In this open label study, we aim to evaluate the effect of the BoNT-A on the spinal nociception in patients affected by spasticity of the lower limbs with associated pain with predominantly neuropathic features. Ten patients with stroke, 10 with multiple sclerosis and 5 with spinal cord injury were enrolled in the study. They were tested with clinical scales (neuropathic pain scale inventory (NPSI), numerical rating scale (NRS), modified Ashworth scale (MAS) and with the nociceptive withdrawal reflex at lower limbs to explore the spinal temporal summation threshold at baseline and 30 day after BoNT-A injection. OnabotulinumtoxinA (50 to 200 units per site) was injected in the lower limb muscles according to the distribution of spasticity. No significant differences were found at baseline for neurophysiological features across groups. After the BoNT-A injection, we recorded a significant reduction in MAS and NRS scores. Regarding the neurophysiological parameters, we described a significant increase in the temporal summation threshold after the BoNT-A injection. Our data supports the hypothesis that peripherally injected OnabotulinumtoxinA modulates the excitability of spinal cord nociceptive pathways. This activity may take place irrespective of the effect of the drug on spasticity.
Collapse
|
40
|
Birlea M, Penning S, Callahan K, Schoenen J. Efficacy and safety of external trigeminal neurostimulation in the prevention of chronic migraine: An open-label trial. CEPHALALGIA REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/2515816319856625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: This trial explored the therapeutic utility and safety of external trigeminal neurostimulation (eTNS) as a preventive treatment in patients suffering from chronic migraine (CM). Methods: It was a monocenter, prospective, open-label, pilot trial conducted at the University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus (Aurora, CO, USA). Participants were adult patients with a history of CM meeting International Classification of Headache Disorder-3 beta (2013) diagnostic criteria with or without medication overuse. After a 1-month baseline period, the patients still fulfilling the inclusion criteria applied at least one daily 20-min session of eTNS for 3 months. Primary outcomes were mean monthly changes in frequency of headache days and in overall acute headache medication intake. Results: Eighty patients were assessed for eligibility, 73 were included in the baseline period after which 58 entered the treatment period and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Compared to baseline, frequency of headache days decreased by −3.12 days (−16.21%, p < 0.001) and acute medication intake decreased from 26.33 to 18.22 (−30.81%, p < 0.001) during the third month of treatment. Twenty-six patients reported 47 minor adverse events, of which only 2 were related to the use of the device (skin irritation under the electrode and headache worsening with vertigo). Conclusions: This trial suggests that eTNS is safe and effective as prophylactic treatment for CM and indicates that a randomized sham-controlled trial is worthwhile. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02342743).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Birlea
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sophie Penning
- Department of Research and Development, CEFALY Technology, Seraing, Belgium
| | - Kyle Callahan
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jean Schoenen
- Headache Research Unit, Citadelle Hospital, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Munksgaard SB, Madsen SK, Wienecke T. Treatment of medication overuse headache-A review. Acta Neurol Scand 2019; 139:405-414. [PMID: 30710346 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2018] [Revised: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH) is the most prevalent chronic headache disorder with a prevalence between 1% and 2% worldwide. The disease has been acknowledged for almost 30 years, yet experts still disagree on how best to treat MOH. By performing a search in PubMed on the terms "medication overuse headache," "analgesics abuse headache," "rebound headache," "drug induced headache," and "headache AND drug misuse" limited to human studies published in English between January 1, 2004, and November 1, 2017, we aimed to evaluate current literature concerning predictors of treatment outcome, inpatient and outpatient treatment programs, initial versus latent administration of prophylactic medications, and to review the effect of prophylactic medications. Selection criteria were prospective, comparative, or controlled trials on treatment of MOH in persons of at least 18 years of age. Several studies evaluated risk factors to predict the outcome of MOH treatment, but many studies were underpowered. Psychiatric comorbidity, high dependence score, and overuse of barbiturates, benzodiazepines, and opioids predicted a poorer outcome of withdrawal therapy. Patients with these risk factors benefit from inpatient treatment, whereas patients without risk factors benefit equally from inpatient and outpatient treatment. Some medications for migraine prophylactics have shown better effect on MOH compared with placebo, but not when combined with withdrawal. We conclude that detoxification programs are of great importance in MOH treatment. Latent administration of prophylactic medications reduces the number of patients needing prophylactic medication. Individualizing treatment according to the predictors of outcome may improve treatment outcome and thus reduce work-related and treatment-related costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe B. Munksgaard
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology Rigshospitalet‐Glostrup Glostrup Denmark
- Neurovascular Center, Department of Neurology Zealand University Hospital Roskilde Denmark
| | - Samuel K. Madsen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology Rigshospitalet‐Glostrup Glostrup Denmark
- Neurovascular Center, Department of Neurology Zealand University Hospital Roskilde Denmark
| | - Troels Wienecke
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology Rigshospitalet‐Glostrup Glostrup Denmark
- Neurovascular Center, Department of Neurology Zealand University Hospital Roskilde Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Freund B, Rao A. Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin in Tension‐Type Headaches: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Pain Pract 2019; 19:541-551. [DOI: 10.1111/papr.12773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Brin Freund
- The Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore Maryland U.S.A
| | - Aruna Rao
- The Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore Maryland U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ong JJY, Wei DYT, Goadsby PJ. Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy for Migraine Prevention: From Pathophysiology to New Drugs. Drugs 2019; 78:411-437. [PMID: 29396834 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-018-0865-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is a common and disabling neurological disorder, with a significant socioeconomic burden. Its pathophysiology involves abnormalities in complex neuronal networks, interacting at different levels of the central and peripheral nervous system, resulting in the constellation of symptoms characteristic of a migraine attack. Management of migraine is individualised and often necessitates the commencement of preventive medication. Recent advancements in the understanding of the neurobiology of migraine have begun to account for some parts of the symptomatology, which has led to the development of novel target-based therapies that may revolutionise how migraine is treated in the future. This review will explore recent advances in the understanding of migraine pathophysiology, and pharmacotherapeutic developments for migraine prevention, with particular emphasis on novel treatments targeted at the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Jia Yuan Ong
- Headache Group, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, Wellcome Foundation Building, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, University Medicine Cluster, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Diana Yi-Ting Wei
- Headache Group, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, Wellcome Foundation Building, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- Headache Group, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. .,NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, Wellcome Foundation Building, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Botulinum Toxin versus Placebo: A Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Treatment for Migraine. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143:239-250. [PMID: 30589800 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin in reducing the frequency of migraine headaches. METHODS The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that compared patients receiving botulinum toxin versus placebo injections in the head and neck muscles, for the preventive treatment of migraine. The primary outcome was change in the number of headache episodes per month from baseline to 3 months. RESULTS There were 17 studies including a total of 3646 patients. Overall analysis reported a tendency in favor of botulinum toxin over placebo at 3 months, with a mean difference in the change of migraine frequency of -0.23 (95 percent CI, -0.47 to 0.02; p = 0.08). The reduction in frequency of chronic migraines was significant, with a mean differential change of -1.56 (95 percent CI, -3.05 to -0.07; p = 0.04). Analysis of chronic migraine frequency was also significant after 2 months. The findings also highlighted an improvement of the patient's quality of life at 3 months in the botulinum toxin group (p < 0.00001). Further adverse events were traced in the botulinum toxin type A group with a statistically significant risk ratio of 1.32 (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis reveals that botulinum toxin type A injections are superior to placebo for chronic migraines after 3 months of therapy. For the first time, a real benefit in patient quality of life is demonstrated with only few and mild adverse events. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, II.
Collapse
|
45
|
Parrales Bravo F, Del Barrio García AA, Gallego MM, Gago Veiga AB, Ruiz M, Guerrero Peral A, Ayala JL. Prediction of patient's response to OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment for migraine. Heliyon 2019; 5:e01043. [PMID: 30886915 PMCID: PMC6401533 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine affects the daily life of millions of people around the world. The most well-known disabling symptom associated with this illness is the intense headache. Nowadays, there are treatments that can diminish the level of pain. OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) has become a very popular medication for treating migraine headaches in those cases in which other medication is not working, typically in chronic migraines. Currently, the positive response to Botox treatment is not clearly understood, yet understanding the mechanisms that determine the effectiveness of the treatment could help with the development of more effective treatments. To solve this problem, this paper sets up a realistic scenario of electronic medical records of migraineurs under BoNT-A treatment where some clinical features from real patients are labeled by doctors. Medical registers have been preprocessed. A label encoding method based on simulated annealing has been proposed. Two methodologies for predicting the results of the first and the second infiltration of the BoNT-A based treatment are contempled. Firstly, a strategy based on the medical HIT6 metric is described, which achieves an accuracy over 91%. Secondly, when this value is not available, several classifiers and clustering methods have been performed in order to predict the reduction and adverse effects, obtaining an accuracy of 85%. Some clinical features as Greater occipital nerves (GON), chronic migraine time evolution and others have been detected as relevant features when examining the prediction models. The GON and the retroocular component have also been described as important features according to doctors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franklin Parrales Bravo
- Department of Computer Architecture and Automation, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain.,Carrera de Ingeniería en Sistemas Computacionales, Facultad Ciencias Matemáticas y Física, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador
| | | | - María Mercedes Gallego
- Neurology Department, "La Princesa" University Hospital, Calle de Diego Leon, 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Beatriz Gago Veiga
- Neurology Department, "La Princesa" University Hospital, Calle de Diego Leon, 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Ruiz
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Angel Guerrero Peral
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - José L Ayala
- Department of Computer Architecture and Automation, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain.,CCS-Center for Computational Simulation, Campus de Montegancedo UPM, Boadilla del Monte 28660, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Caronna E, Gallardo VJ, Hernández-Beltrán N, Torres-Ferrus M, Pozo-Rosich P. OnabotulinumtoxinA: An Effective Tool in the Therapeutic Arsenal for Chronic Migraine With Medication Overuse. Front Neurol 2018; 9:808. [PMID: 30386285 PMCID: PMC6199959 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the early response of onabotulinumtoxinA as a treatment tool in patients with chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse (MO). Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study in patients with CM and MO who received two cycles of onabotulinumtoxinA infiltrations following PREEMPT protocol. We evaluated the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA in MO resolution, defined as less than 10 days/month of acute medication intake (triptans, opioids, and combinations) or 15 days/month (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs - and simple analgesics). In addition, we analyzed changes in headache frequency, pain intensity, and headache-related disability (MIDAS scale). A multivariate analysis was carried out to identify factors independently related to MO resolution. Results: We included 139 consecutive patients with CM and MO. After 2 cycles of onabotulinumtoxinA, 73.4% had ≥50% reduction in acute medication intake and 57.6% achieved MO resolution. 7.9% of patients did not use any acute medication after treatment. Even though both MO-ongoing group and MO-resolution group improve in headache frequency, the reduction was significantly higher for the group which discontinued the use of acute medication after onabotulinumtoxinA treatment (p < 0.001). In this group, 73.0% reduced headache frequency ≥50%. Daily headache changed from 71.2 to 23.2% (p < 0.001). Both groups showed an improvement in pain intensity and in MIDAS score (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis we observed that MO resolution had an inverse association with medication intake at baseline (OR:0.294, p < 0.05) and a direct association with frequency (OR:20.455, p < 0.001) and MIDAS score (OR: 6.465, p < 0.05) improvements. Conclusion: OnabotulinumtoxinA has an early beneficial effect on the discontinuation of acute medication in a substantial proportion of patients with CM and MO. Therefore, onabotulinumtoxinA might be considered a therapeutic tool in CM with MO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor José Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bottiroli S, Allena M, Sances G, De Icco R, Avenali M, Fadic R, Katsarava Z, Lainez MJA, Goicochea MT, Bendtsen L, Jensen RH, Nappi G, Tassorelli C. Psychological, clinical, and therapeutic predictors of the outcome of detoxification in a large clinical population of medication-overuse headache: A six-month follow-up of the COMOESTAS Project. Cephalalgia 2018; 39:135-147. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102418783317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Aim To identify factors that may be predictors of the outcome of a detoxification treatment in medication-overuse headache. Methods Consecutive patients entering a detoxification program in six centres in Europe and Latin America were evaluated and followed up for 6 months. We evaluated anxious and depressive symptomatology (though patients with severe psychiatric comorbidity were excluded), quality of life, headache-related disability, headache characteristics, and prophylaxis upon discharge. Results Of the 492 patients who completed the six-month follow up, 407 ceased overuse following the detoxification (non overusers), another 23 ceased overuse following detoxification but relapsed during the follow-up. In the 407 non-overusers, headache acquired an episodic pattern in 287 subjects (responders). At the multivariate analyses, lower depression scores (odds ratio = 0.891; p = 0.001) predicted ceasing overuse. The primary headache diagnosis – migraine with respect to tension-type headache (odds ratio = 0.224; p = 0.001) or migraine plus tension-type headache (odds ratio = 0.467; p = 0.002) – and the preventive treatment with flunarizine (compared to no such treatment) (odds ratio = 0.891; p = 0.001) predicted being a responder. A longer duration of chronic headache (odds ratio = 1.053; p = 0.032) predicted relapse into overuse. Quality of life and disability were not associated with any of the outcomes. Conclusions Though exploratory in nature, these findings point to specific factors that are associated with a positive outcome of medication-overuse headache management, while identifying others that may be associated with a negative outcome. Evaluation of the presence/absence of these factors may help to optimize the management of this challenging groups of chronic headache sufferers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Bottiroli
- Headache Science Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marta Allena
- Headache Science Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Grazia Sances
- Headache Science Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto De Icco
- Headache Science Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy
| | - Micol Avenali
- Headache Science Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy
| | - Ricardo Fadic
- Department of Neurology, Pontificia Catolica University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Miguel JA Lainez
- Foundation of the Valencian Community, University Clinical Hospital, Spain
| | - Maria Teresa Goicochea
- Integral Pain Centre, Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas Infantiles (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lars Bendtsen
- Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Rigmor Højland Jensen
- Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Giuseppe Nappi
- Headache Science Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Headache Science Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tassorelli C, Tedeschi G, Sarchielli P, Pini LA, Grazzi L, Geppetti P, De Tommaso M, Aguggia M, Cortelli P, Martelletti P. Optimizing the long-term management of chronic migraine with onabotulinumtoxinA in real life. Expert Rev Neurother 2017; 18:167-176. [PMID: 29280408 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1419867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Management of chronic migraine is challenging. OnabotulinumtoxinA (OBT-A) is the only medication licensed for prevention of chronic migraine, and has been widely adopted in clinical practice. Limited data is available on its long-term use. Areas covered: Data from controlled trials are combined with available data on the long-term use of OBT-A in real-life studies, with information obtained in a recent survey among Italian headache centers, and the clinical experience of the authors. Six areas were identified as relevant to patients with chronic migraine: 1) definition of responders to OBT-A; 2) management of responders to OBT-A; 3) optimal timing of prophylaxis with OBT-A; 4) position of OBT-A in prevention of chronic migraine; 5) management of medication overuse, and 6) patient education. Expert commentary: This review provides an update on the latest evidence regarding the long-term use of OBT-A in chronic migraine and analyzes the critical issues in the decision-making process that emerge from the analysis of the literature and routine practice. A treatment algorithm is proposed for the adoption in the daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Tassorelli
- a Headache Science Center , National Neurological Institute C. Mondino , Pavia , Italy.,b Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences , University of Pavia , Pavia , Italy
| | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- c Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences , University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" , Naples , Italy
| | - P Sarchielli
- d Neurology Clinic , University Hospital of Perugia , Perugia , Italy
| | - Luigi Alberto Pini
- e Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, Polyclinic Hospital , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia , Modena , Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- f Headache and Neuroalgology Unit , Neurological Institute "C. Besta" IRCCS Foundation , Milan , Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- g Headache Center, Department of Health Sciences , University of Florence , Florence , Italy
| | - Marina De Tommaso
- h Applied Neurophysiology and Pain Unit, SMBNOS Department, Polyclinic General Hospital , Bari Aldo Moro University , Bari , Italy
| | - Marco Aguggia
- i Headache Center, Neurology Department , Asti Hospital , Asti , Italy
| | - P Cortelli
- j Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences , University of Bologna , Bologna , Italy.,k IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna , Bellaria Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- l Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome and Regional Referral Headache Center , Sant'Andrea Hospital , Rome , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Domínguez C, Pozo-Rosich P, Torres-Ferrús M, Hernández-Beltrán N, Jurado-Cobo C, González-Oria C, Santos S, Monzón MJ, Latorre G, Álvaro LC, Gago A, Gallego M, Medrano V, Huerta M, García-Alhama J, Belvís R, Leira Y, Leira R. OnabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: predictors of response. A prospective multicentre descriptive study. Eur J Neurol 2017; 25:411-416. [PMID: 29171146 DOI: 10.1111/ene.13523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OnabotulinumtoxinA is a treatment specifically approved for the prophylaxis of chronic migraine in adults. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of OnabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine after 1 year of treatment in a real-life setting and to identify clinical predictors of outcome. METHODS We designed a prospective multicentre study performed in 13 hospitals in Spain. Patients underwent a complete medical history and examination. They were treated with OnabotulinumtoxinA every 12 weeks for 1 year. Data about outcome, adverse events, abortive medication use, emergency room use and disability were collected at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS A total of 725 subjects completed the study. At 12 months, 79.3% showed >50% reduction in number of headaches per month and 94.9% reported no adverse events. Unilaterality of pain, fewer days of disability per month and milder headache at baseline were correlated with good outcome. Duration of disease <12 months increased the chances of response to treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA (odds ratio, 1.470; 95% confidence interval, 1.123-2.174; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS This study confirmed the effectiveness of treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA after 1 year of treatment. The chances of a good outcome may be increased by starting treatment in the first 12 months after chronic migraine diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Domínguez
- Service of Neurology, Headache Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela
| | - P Pozo-Rosich
- Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Torres-Ferrús
- Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - N Hernández-Beltrán
- Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Neuroclinica and Promedan, Medellin, Colombia
| | | | | | - S Santos
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza
| | | | - G Latorre
- Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid
| | | | - A Gago
- Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao
| | - M Gallego
- Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid
| | - V Medrano
- Hospital General Universitario de Elda, Alicante
| | | | | | - R Belvís
- Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona
| | - Y Leira
- OMEQUI Research Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - R Leira
- Service of Neurology, Headache Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sarchielli P, Romoli M, Corbelli I, Bernetti L, Verzina A, Brahimi E, Eusebi P, Caproni S, Calabresi P. Stopping Onabotulinum Treatment after the First Two Cycles Might Not Be Justified: Results of a Real-life Monocentric Prospective Study in Chronic Migraine. Front Neurol 2017; 8:655. [PMID: 29255444 PMCID: PMC5723003 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Onabotulinum toxin A (OnabotA) cyclic treatment is approved for the prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine (CM), a highly disabling disorder. Although treatment response varies among patients, current guidelines suggest to stop treatment after cycle 2 if no response is achieved. This prospective study aimed to define, in real-life setting, the evolution of the response to OnabotA over five cycles of treatment among patients non-responding to cycle 1. The results of this study might help in decision-making, in particular whether prosecuting OnabotA further or not, when facing a patient not responding to cycle 1. Methods Patients failing to respond at cycle 1 were recruited to complete five cycles. Key outcomes were: (i) a ≥50% reduction in headache days, (ii) a ≥50% reduction in total cumulative hours of headache on headache days and (iii) a ≥5-point improvement in Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores. Results Overall, 56 patients were included. Mean age was 45.7 years (female 83.9%). Severe (≥60) HIT-6 score was reported at baseline by 95.8% of patients. Responders (headache days reduction of more than 50%) progressively increased cycle after cycle, doubling from cycle 2 to cycle 5 (from 27 to 48%). In addition, patients regressed from CM to episodic migraine moving on with each cycle, with 78% of them reaching less than nine migraine days/month after cycle 5. The headache days per month decreased significantly from cycle 1 to cycle 5 (overall from 23.3 ± 5.7 to 9.2 ± 3.6; p < 0.001). During 12 months (5 cycles), migraine days per month progressively abated (from 18.5 to 8.7; p < 0.001), days with symptomatic medications intake/month consistently decreased (from 17.4 to 8.1; p < 0.001), and mean HIT-6 score lowered (from 72.4 ± 5.7 to 50.2 ± 4.3; p < 0.001). Conclusion The positive effect of OnabotA treatment spreads over the course of the treatment and might also manifest late in treatment course among patients with no benefit after the first two cycles. Thus, the results of this real-life study suggest to extend OnabotA treatment further, beyond cycle 2, to avoid premature withdrawal in patients who would have become responders at cycle 3, 4, or 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Sarchielli
- Neurology Clinic, University of Perugia-Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Michele Romoli
- Neurology Clinic, University of Perugia-Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ilenia Corbelli
- Neurology Clinic, University of Perugia-Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Laura Bernetti
- Neurology Clinic, University of Perugia-Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Angela Verzina
- Neurology Clinic, University of Perugia-Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Elona Brahimi
- Neurology Clinic, University of Perugia-Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paolo Eusebi
- Regional Health Authority, Public Health Regional Department, Perugia, Italy
| | - Stefano Caproni
- Neurology Clinic, University of Perugia-Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paolo Calabresi
- Neurology Clinic, University of Perugia-Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.,IRCCS Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|