Optimal ligation level of the primary feeding artery and bowel resection margin in colon cancer surgery: the influence of the site of the primary feeding artery

The effect of ileal resection length on postoperative complications and prognosis in right colon cancer

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of literature on the length of the terminal ileum to be resected in right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Therefore, we aimed to determine the mean ileal loop length and the effect of this variation on postoperative complications and long-term oncological outcomes in patients who underwent right hemicolectomy.

METHODS

Right hemicolectomy surgeries performed for colon cancer in a tertiary care hospital between January 2011 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective database. Two patient groups were established based on the mean length of the resected ileum above and below 7 cm. The two groups were compared for clinicopathological data, postoperative complications, mortality, long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The factors contributing to OS and DFS were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study included 217 patients. Body mass index (BMI) values were significantly higher in the ileum resection length > 7 cm group (p = 0.009). Pathological N stage, tumor diameter, and number of metastatic lymph nodes were significantly higher in the ileum resection length > 7 cm group (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.026, respectively). There was no significant difference for postoperative complication and mortality rates between the two groups. The mean follow-up period was 61.2 months (2-120) in all patients. The total number of deaths was 29 (11.7%) while the 60-month OS was 83.5% and 50-month DFS was 81.8%. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of OS and DFS rates (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive resection of the distal ileum in right hemicolectomy does not provide any benefit in terms of prognosis and complications.The ileum resection length and values close to it in our study appear to be sufficient.

D3 lymph node dissection improves the survival outcome in patients with pT2 colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The extent of lymphadenectomy in patients with pT2 colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of D3 and D2 lymph node dissection (LND) on survival in patients diagnosed with pT2 CRC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study from a high-volume cancer center in Japan. From April 2007 to December 2020, 6273 patients with primary CRC were included in the study; among these, 616 patients diagnosed with pT2 CRC underwent radical colorectal resection. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance potential confounding factors, and a total of 104 matched pairs were extracted from the entire cohort. Independent risk factors associated with prognosis were determined by Cox regression analysis. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

Before PSM, there was a statistically significant difference across the cohort in OS and CSS (p = 0.000 and 0.013) between D3 and D2 LND groups; the estimated hazard ratio (HR) was 2.2 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-4.4, p = 0.031) for OS in the D3 LND and 4.4 (95% CI, 1.7 to 11, p = 0.0027) for CSS (p = 0.013). There was also a significant difference (p = 0.024) in OS between the D3 and D2 LND groups in the matched cohort, with an estimated HR for OS of 3.3 (95% CI, 1.2 to 9.1, p = 0.024) and an estimated HR for CSS of 7.2 (95% CI, 1.6 to 33, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

D3 LND had a significant survival advantage in the treatment of pT2 CRC. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the application of D3 LND in radical surgery for preoperative T2 CRC.

A Clinicopathological Feature-Based Nomogram for Predicting the Likelihood of D3 Lymph Node Metastasis in Right-Sided Colon Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Despite advancements in treating right-sided colon cancer patients, the ideal scope of lymphadenectomy remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to investigate the likelihood of D3 lymph node metastasis in right-sided colon cancer patients and develop a clinicopathological feature-based nomogram for D3 lymphadenectomy.

DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed 286 right-sided colon cancer patients who underwent D3 lymphadenectomy. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether D3 lymph node metastasis was positive. Then, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to obtain independent risk factors for predicting D3 lymph node metastasis. Moreover, we performed receiver operating characteristic curve analyses to evaluate the predictive power of the model.

SETTING

This study was conducted at Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University in China.

PATIENTS

A total of 286 consecutive patients who underwent right hemicolectomy and D3 lymphadenectomy as a primary treatment for right-sided colon cancer between January 2016 and December 2019 were enrolled in this study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary measures were independent risk factors for predicting D3 lymph node metastasis in right-sided colon cancer.

RESULTS

The D3 lymph node metastasis rate in right-sided colon cancer patients was 16.1% (46/286). D3 lymphadenectasis on CT, lymphatic invasion, and T4 tumors were filtered out as independent risk factors for D3 lymph node metastasis according to the multivariable logistic regression analysis. We established a nomogram that predicted D3 lymph node metastasis of right-sided colon cancer on the combination of the 3 factors with an area under the curve of 0.717 (95% CI, 0.629-0.806).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study from a single center.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a valuable clinicopathological feature-based nomogram to predict the incidence of D3 lymph node metastasis in right-sided colon cancer patients. Patients with D3 lymphadenectasis on CT, preoperative T4 tumors, and lymphatic invasion should undergo D3 lymphadenectomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B852 .

UN NOMOGRAMA BASADO EN CARACTERSTICAS CLNICOPATOLGICAS PARA PREDECIR LA PROBABILIDAD DE METSTASIS EN GANGLIOS LINFTICOS D EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE COLON DERECHO

ANTECEDENTES:A pesar de los avances en el tratamiento de pacientes con cáncer de colon derecho, el ámbito ideal de la linfadenectomía sigue siendo controvertido.OBJETIVO:Investigar la probabilidad de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos D3 en pacientes con cáncer de colon derecho y desarrollar un nomograma basado en características clínico-patológicas basado para la linfadenectomía D3.DISEÑO:Analizamos retrospectivamente a 286 pacientes con cáncer de colon derecho que se sometieron a linfadenectomía D3. Los pacientes se dividieron en dos grupos en función de si eran positivos para metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos D3. Luego, se realizaron análisis de regresión logística univariable y multivariable para obtener factores de riesgo independientes para predecir metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos D3. Además, realizamos análisis de las curvas de características operatorias del receptor para evaluar el poder predictivo del modelo.SEDE:Este estudio se realizó en el Hospital Nanfang de la Universidad Médica del Sur en China.PACIENTES:Un total de 286 pacientes consecutivos que se sometieron a hemicolectomía derecha y linfadenectomía D3 como tratamiento primario para el cáncer de colon derecho entre enero de 2016 y diciembre de 2019 se inscribieron en este estudio.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las medidas primarias fueron factores de riesgo independientes para predecir las metástasis en ganglios linfáticos D3 en el cáncer de colon derecho.RESULTADOS:La tasa de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos D3 en pacientes con cáncer de colon del lado derecho fue del 16,1% (46/286). El aumento de tamaño de ganglios D3 en la TC, la invasión linfática y los tumores T4 se filtraron como factores de riesgo independientes de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos D3 de acuerdo con el análisis de regresión logística multivariable. Establecimos un nomograma que predijo metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos D3 del cáncer de colon derecho en la combinación de los tres factores con un área bajo la curva de 0,717 (IC del 95%, 0,629-0,806).LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:Desarrollamos un valioso nomograma basado en características clínico-patológicas para predecir la incidencia de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos D3 en pacientes con cáncer de colon derecho. Los pacientes con crecimiento de ganglios D3 en TC, tumores con clasificación preoperatoria T4 e invasión linfática, deben ser sometidos a linfadenectomía D3. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B852 . (Traducción-Dr. Juan Carlos Reyes ).

Risk factors of central area lymph nodes metastasis for guiding optimal right colon cancer surgery: A retrospective multicenter study.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1991182/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background: D3 or CME lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer (RCC) with lymph nodes metastasis (LNM) is strongly recommended but the anatomical landmark remains controversial. Central LNM predicted poor prognosis in RCC and determined the extent of lymphadenectomy. Methods: Data for 1712 RCC patients treated with D3/CME lymphadenectomy were reviewed. These patients had been treated in 9 centers. A total of 1023 RCC patients were enrolled in the derivation cohort while 689 patients were enrolled in the validation cohort. Results: The overall central LNM incidence was 12.58% (215/1712). In the derivation cohort, univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses revealed that preoperative N staging based on CT scan (OR=7.85, 95% CI, 4.53-14.51, p<0.001), tumor differentiation (OR=0.53, 95% CI, 0.33-0.86, p=0.01) and intraoperative view of tumor movability (OR=0.53, 95% CI, 0.33-0.86, p=0.02) were significant independent factors. Areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) for assessing central LNM in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.802 and 0.750, respectively. The risk-scoring system for patients with RCC was also established. A score of 0 points was the optimal cut-off value for central LNM. Compared to patients in the low-risk group, patients in the high-risk group exhibited worse overall survival outcomes (p<0.001).Conclusions: The established model can be used for preoperative assessment of the risk of central LNM in RCC patients, and for determining the landmark for D3/CME lymphadenectomy, therefore might contribute to decreased therapeutic complications and improved clinical outcomes.

Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional hemicolectomy in patients with right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has introduced a promising surgical approach for treatment of right colon cancer. However, benefits of CME are still a matter of debate. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess safety and long-term outcomes of CME versus conventional right hemicolectomy (CRH).

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for retrieving studies comparing CME with CRH in right colon cancer. After data extraction from the included studies, meta-analysis was performed to compare postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, 30-day mortality, number of lymph node yield, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1871 patients enrolled. No difference was observed in postoperative complications (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.47, p = 0.34). CME was associated with significantly higher number of lymph nodes retrieved (MD 9.17, CI 4.67-13.68, p < 0.001). CME also improved 3-year OS (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.17-2.11, p = 0.003), 5-year OS (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.89, p = 0.02), and 5-year DFS (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.29-3.07, p = 0.002). A sub-group analysis for patients with stage III colon cancer showed no significant impact of CME on 3-year and 5-year OS (OR 2.47, 95% CI 0.86-7.06, p = 0.09; OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.78-1.94, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Although with limited evidence, CME shows similar postoperative complication rates and an improved survival outcome compared with CRH.

Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by transanal total mesorectal excision assisted by single-port laparoscopic surgery for low-lying rectal adenocarcinoma: a single center study

Purpose

To assess the feasibility and short-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by transanal total mesorectal excision assisted by single-port laparoscopic surgery (TaTME-SPLS) for low-lying rectal adenocarcinoma.

Methods and materials

A total of 23 patients with clinical stage II-III low-lying (from anal verge 0-8 cm) rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant CCRT followed by TaTME-SPLS consecutively from December 2015 to December 2018, were enrolled into our study. Chi-squared testing and Student’s t testing were used to make parametric comparisons, and Fisher’s exact test or the Mann–Whitney U test were used to make nonparametric comparisons.

Results

Conversion rate in patients who underwent neoadjuvant CCRT followed by TaTME-SPLS was only 4%. The mean operation time was 366 min and the inter-sphincter resection (ISR) was done for 14 patients (60%). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 15. There was no surgical mortality, but the 30-day morbidity rate was 21% (5 patients were Clavien-Dindo I-II). Pathological complete response was 21.74% with 100% organ preservation and 100% clear distal margin after neoadjuvant CCRT followed by TaTME-SPLS.

Conclusion

TaTME-SPLS would be highly successful in lymph node negative and low T stage of low-lying rectal cancer patients who had pathological complete remission or high percentage of partial remission after neoadjuvant CCRT.

The effect of pericolic lymph nodes metastasis beyond 10 cm proximal to the tumor on patients with rectal cancer

Background

This study aims to determine the real incidence of pericolic lymph nodes metastasis beyond 10 cm proximal to the tumor (pPCN) and its prognostic significance in rectal cancer patients.

Methods

Consecutive patients with rectal cancer underwent curative resection between 2015 and 2017 were included. Margin distance was marked and measured in vivo and lymph nodes were harvested on fresh specimens. Clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes (3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)) were analyzed between patients with pPCN and patients without pPCN (nPCN).

Results

There were 298 patients in the nPCN group and 14 patients (4.5%) in pPCN group. Baseline characteristics were balanced except more patients received preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy in pPCN group. Preoperative more advanced cTNM stage (log-rank p = 0.005) and intraoperative more pericolic lymph nodes beyond 10 cm proximal to the tumor (PCNs) (log-rank p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for pPCN. The maximum short-axis diameter of mesenteric lymph nodes ≥8 mm was also contributed to predicting the pPCN. pPCN was an independent prognostic indicator and associated with worse 3-year OS (66% vs 91%, Cox p = 0.033) and DFS (58% vs 92%, Cox p = 0.012).

Conclusion

The incidence of pPCN was higher than expected. Patients with high-risk factors (cTNM stage III or more PCNs) might get benefits from an extended proximal bowel resection to avoid residual positive PCNs.

Prognostic Impact of the Length of the Distal Resection Margin in Rectosigmoid Cancer: An Analysis of the JSCCR Database between 1995 and 2004

Objectives

The necessary and sufficient length of the distal resection margin (l-DRM) for rectosigmoid cancer remains controversial. This study evaluated the validity of the 3-cm l-DRM rule for rectosigmoid cancer in the Japanese classification of colorectal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1,443 patients with cT3 and cT4 rectosigmoid cancer who underwent R0 resection in Japanese institutions between 1995 and 2004. We identified the optimal cutoff point of the l-DRM affecting overall survival (OS) rate using a multivariate Cox regression analysis model. Using this cutoff point, the patients were divided into two groups after balancing the potential confounding factors of the l-DRM using propensity score matching, and the OS rates of the two groups were compared.

Results

A multivariate Cox regression analysis model revealed that the l-DRM of 4 cm was the best cutoff point with the greatest impact on OS rate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.84; P = 0.0452) and with the lowest Akaike information criterion value. In the matched cohort study, the OS rate of patients who had l-DRM of 4 cm or more was significantly higher than that of patients who had l-DRM < 4 cm (n = 402; 5-year OS rates, 87.6% vs. 80.3%, respectively; HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.09-2.31; P = 0.0136).

Conclusions

For cT3 and cT4 rectosigmoid cancer, l-DRM of 4 cm may be an appropriate landmark for a curative intent surgery, and we were unable to definitively confirm the validity of the Japanese 3-cm l-DRM rule.

Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: is it worth it?

Total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the miracle surgical technique which has since allowed the outcomes of rectal cancer to surpass that of colon cancer. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) attempts to adopt the same principles as that of TME and apply it to colon cancer surgery. Initial retrospective case series and comparative studies have shown promising oncological outcomes. CME entails the en bloc removal of a sufficient length of colonic specimen within an intact peritoneal envelop with extended lymphadenectomy through a high central ligation of vessels. This technique, standardizing the method for resection of right sided colon cancer, has witness promising perioperative and oncological data for both open and laparoscopic methods. However, most data available are mostly retrospective with a glaring lack of level 1 evidence. Despite the technique showing similar outcomes to that of conventional colectomy, parts of the procedure put the patient (and surgeon) at risk of potentially catastrophic complications. As promising as the initial results of CME has been, more well-designed randomized control trials are necessary to justify the increased risks taken and effort to mount the learning curve for CME.

Prophylactic Surgery and Extended Oncologic Radicality in Gastric and Colorectal Hereditary Cancer Syndromes

Prophylactic surgery for high-penetrance hereditary gastric and colorectal cancer can be a primary prophylaxis of cancer and a secondary oncologic prevention. As early cancer is often detected in the resected organ, there has been no prophylaxis of cancer but cancer treatment. Extended oncological radicality with removal of the complete organ is a tertiary prevention as metachronous cancer is avoided. The indication for prophylactic surgery or extended oncological radicality is presented regarding hereditary and familial gastric and colorectal cancer. Hereditary diffuse type gastric cancer (E-cadherin mutation) and familial adenomatous polyposis coli (APC or MYH mutation) are well-accepted indications for prophylactic surgery with a variety of considerations regarding phenotype, genotype, associated diseases, age, timing, extent, and technique of surgery. Not so much prophylactic surgery as extended oncologic radicality can be considered in familial gastric and colorectal cancer as well as Lynch or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC). Clinical, molecular, and technical progress leads to less invasive and risk-adapted surgical and nonsurgical interventions, expanding the variety of individualized treatment options.

Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision using an 'artery-first' approach

Background

According to previous guidelines, the lymph nodes around the right side of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) should be dissected and removed en bloc. However, due to the technical challenge and the risk of complications, most surgeons perform the dissection along the axis of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV). Herein, we described an ‘artery-first’ approach for laparoscopic radical extended right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME).

Methods

A total of 22 cases were collected from January to October 2016. The right side of the SMA and SMV were exposed and separated, and the No. 203, No. 213 and No. 223 lymph nodes were dissected en bloc. Toldt’s fascia was dissected and expanded laterally to the ascending colon, cranial to the pancreas head. The caudal root of the mesentery and lateral attachments of the ascending colon were completely mobilized.

Results

There were 9 male and 13 female patients, with a mean age of 63.1 (range, 39–83) years and the mean body mass index was 24.6 (range, 18.3–37.7) kg/m². The mean operative time was 192.5 (range, 145–240) minutes and the mean intra-operative blood loss was 55.0 (range, 10–300) ml. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 27.0 (range, 13–55) and the time to flatus and hospital stay were 35.0 (range, 26–120) hours and 7.5 (range, 5–20) days, respectively. Minor complications occurred in two patients and no post-operative death was observed.

Conclusions

The preliminary results suggest that the reported approach may be a feasible and safe procedure that is more in accordance with the principles of CME.

Lymph node yield, survival benefit, and safety of high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare high inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation (HL) with low IMA ligation (LL) for the treatment of colorectal cancer and to evaluate the lymph node yield, survival benefit, and safety of these surgeries.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were systematically searched for relevant articles that compared HL and LL for sigmoid or rectal cancer. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and the weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 30 studies were included in this analysis. There were significantly higher odds of anastomotic leakage and urethral dysfunction in patients treated with HL compared to those treated with LL (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.55; OR = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.39 to 4.33, respectively). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the total number of harvested lymph nodes, the number of harvested lymph nodes around root of the IMA, local recurrence rate, and operation time. Further, no statistically significant group differences in 5-year overall survival rates and 5-year disease-free survival rates were detected among all patients nor among subgroups of stage II patients and stage III patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LL can achieve equivalent lymph node yield to HL, and both procedures have similar survival benefits. However, LL is associated with a lower incidence of leakage and urethral dysfunction. Thus, LL is recommended for colorectal cancer surgery.

Splenic flexure mobilization in rectal cancer surgery: do we always need it?

Splenic flexure (SFM) in rectal cancer surgery is a crucial step which may increase the difficulty of the operation. The aim of this retrospective single-center study is to demonstrate if the selective omission of SFM during anterior rectal resection can reduce the complexity of the operation, without affecting post-operative and oncologic outcomes. Data of 112 consecutive rectal resections for cancer from March 2010 to March 2017 were analyzed and divided into two groups: SFM and No-SFM. A sub-analysis was then performed for laparoscopy and traditional cases. Post-operative and oncologic outcomes, including overall (OS) and cancer-related survival (CRS), were analyzed and compared. SFM was performed in 42% of cases and laparoscopy was used in 73.2%. Operative time resulted significantly lower in the No-SFM group (190 vs. 225 min, p = 0.01). In laparoscopy in the No-SFM group, operative time and post-operative stay were significantly lower (205.5 vs. 222.5 min, p = 0.04; 9 vs. 10 days, p = 0.01). Most of the open resections were performed without SFM (35.4% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.02). No statistical significant differences were found in OS and CRS in the two groups. We support the hypothesis that every surgeon should carry out an accurate intra-operative evaluation to perform a selective SFM. When possible, SFM can be safely avoided with no additional risks in terms of post-operative and oncologic outcomes.

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Colon Cancer

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons is dedicated to ensuring high-quality patient care by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is composed of society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive and not prescriptive. Their purpose is to provide information on which decisions can be made, rather than to dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, health care workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. It should be recognized that these guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient.

Resection of Colorectal Cancer With Versus Without Preservation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical significance of preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in comparison with IMA ligation in surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal (colorectal) cancer.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n=862) with colorectal cancer who underwent intended surgical resection of the main tumor between 1986 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: IMA preserved (n=745) and IMA ligated (n=117).

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in incidence of advanced stage III or IV disease between the 2 groups (P=0.56 and 0.51, respectively), whereas a longer operation time (287 [95 to 700] vs. 215 [60 to 900] min, respectively; P<0.001) and greater amount of intraoperative bleeding (595 [15 to 4530] vs. 235 [1 to 11565] mL, respectively; P<0.001) were observed in the IMA-ligated group. The overall incidence of surgery-related complications was higher in the IMA-ligated group than in the IMA-preserved group (53.0% vs. 38.5%, respectively; P=0.003). Urinary dysfunction and abdominal abscess were significantly more frequent in the IMA-ligated group (11.1% vs. 4.0%, P=0.001; and 6.8% vs. 2.6%, P=0.01, respectively), and postoperative hospitalization was longer (11 to 140, median 28 vs. 5 to 153, median 19 d, respectively; P<0.001). No significant difference was found in overall survival rate between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For colorectal cancer resection, IMA preservation may be no change to IMA ligation as to patient' survival, with small risk of operative morbidity.

Optimum level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation for the left-sided colorectal cancer. Systematic review for high and low ligation continuum

OBJECTIVES

To compares the effectiveness and impact of high inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) versus low IMA ligation on 5-year survival, lymph node yield rates, and peri-operative morbidity and mortality. 

METHODS

The databases of Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC), the Web of Science, EBSCO and MEDLINE were searched using MeSH terms 'colorectal cancer', 'inferior mesenteric artery', 'high ligation', 'low ligation', 'mesenteric lymph nodes', 'prognosis', and 'survival'. Only clinical studies were selected and review articles and meta-analysis were excluded. In cases of duplicate cohorts, only the latest article was included. Irrelevant articles and the articles on both right and left sided CRC were excluded. The finally selected studies were analysed for the defined end-point outcomes. 

RESULTS

The published data has shown that high IMA ligation improves the yield of harvested lymph node that allows accurate tumor staging and a more reliable estimation of prognosis. High ligation was not found to be positively correlated with increased anastomotic leakage or impaired genito-urinary function. However, high ligation demands advanced surgical expertise and longer operating time. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival rates for both techniques. Some studies have reported fatal complications of high ligation such as proximal bowel necrosis.  

CONCLUSION

Although there is no consensus, this research signals the routine use of high ligation for left-sided CRC. However, the published fatal complications following high ligation and no significant difference in 5-year survival rates demand more studies to establishing a unified protocol.

Prognostic impact of the length of the longitudinal resection margin in colon cancer

AIM

Although several guidelines recommend a longitudinal resection margin (LRM) of at least 5 cm, the impact of the LRM on survival is still unknown. The study assessed the prognostic significance of the LRM in patients with colon cancer.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed 1343 primary colon cancer patients without distant metastasis who underwent curative resection between January 2004 and December 2012. Patients were classified into three groups: LRM < 3 cm (n = 186), LRM ≥ 3 and <5 cm (n = 376) and LRM ≥5 cm (n = 781). Clinicopathological characteristics and the oncological outcome in the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

The median LRM length was 5.0 cm (range 0.5-26.0 cm). With increasing LRM, the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) tended to increase (19.5 ± 12.0, 22.1 ± 12.8 and 30.0 ± 16.2; P < 0.001). After a median follow-up period of 45 (1-128) months, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (89.2%, 89.0% and 87.0%; P = 0.629) and 5-year overall survival (OS) (89.0%, 92.1% and 91.8%; P = 0.679) were not significantly different between the three groups. When confounders were adjusted, LRM was not significantly associated with either DFS or OS, but the number of retrieved LNs (< 12) was an independent risk factor for both DFS (hazard ratio 1.748, 95% confidence interval 1.048-2.917) and OS (hazard ratio 1.929, 95% confidence interval 1.046-3.559).

CONCLUSION

LRM was not associated with oncological outcome, but care should be taken to obtain an adequate number of LNs for better survival.

Safety of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients over 80 years old: a propensity score matching study

PURPOSES

To establish the safety of laparoscopic-assisted colorectal resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged ≥80 years.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a chart review of patients who underwent colorectal cancer resection between 2009 and 2014 in Kochi Medical School. The effect of patient age on the extent of lymph node dissection and operative safety was assessed by comparing the short-term results of elderly patients with those of younger patients after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of a total of 506 patients with colorectal cancer, 398 underwent laparoscopic surgery and 23% of these patients were aged ≥80 years old. The elderly patients tended to have poorer general condition and larger tumors, although no significant differences were found in tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, or synchronous distant metastasis between the groups. After adjustment for preoperative factors, we noted that the elderly patients tended to undergo less aggressive surgical resection (P = 0.01). Further analysis after including surgical factors for propensity score matching revealed a similar rate of complications in the two groups (24 vs. 25%, respectively; P = 0.85), and similar postoperative death rates and length of postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present study demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer should not be avoided based on simply the age of the patient.

Prospective multicenter registration study of colorectal cancer: significant variations in radicality and oncosurgical quality-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Protocol SAKK 40/00

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate in a multicenter cohort study the radicality of colorectal cancer resections, to assess the oncosurgical quality of colorectal specimens, and to compare the performance between centers.

METHODS

One German and nine Swiss hospitals agreed to prospectively register all patients with primary colorectal cancer resected between September 2001 and June 2005. The median number of eligible patients with one primary tumor included per center was 95 (range 12-204).

RESULTS

The following variations of median values or percentages between centers were found: length of bowel specimen 20-39 cm (25.8 cm), maximum height of mesocolon 6.5-12.5 cm (9.0 cm), number of examined lymph nodes 9-24 (16), distance to nearer bowel resection margin in colon cancer 4.8-12 cm (7 cm), and in rectal cancer 2-3 cm (2.5 cm), central ligation of major artery 40-97 % (71 %), blood loss 200-500 ml (300 ml), need for perioperative blood transfusion 5-40 % (19 %), tumor opened during mobilization 0-11 % (5 %), T4-tumors not en-bloc resected 0-33 % (4 %), inadvertent perforation of mesocolon/mesorectum 0-8 % (4 %), no-touch isolation technique 36-86 % (67 %), abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer 0-30 % (17 %), rectal cancer specimen with circumferential margin ≤1 mm 0-19 % (10 %), in-hospital mortality 0-6 % (2 %), anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess 0-17 % (7 %), re-operation 0-17 % (8 %).

CONCLUSION

In colorectal cancer, surgery considerable variations between different centers were found with regard to radicality and oncosurgical quality, suggesting a potential for targeted improvement of surgical technique.

[Laparoscopic colectomy versus colectomy performed via laparotomy in the treatment of non-metastatic colic adenocarcinomas]

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic colectomy is considered with increasing frequency the gold standard treatment for colorectal cancer. Our study aims to show that short-term results and the oncological safety of laparoscopy are at least equivalent to those of laparotomy in the treatment of non-metastatic colic adenocarcinomas. We also highlight the impact of the learning curve on outcomes after laparoscopy in patients with these cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of all patients undergoing surgery for resectable colic adenocarcinomas over a period of 6 years. The study population was divided into 2 groups based on the surgical procedure used initially. The group "OC" included 35 patients who underwent midline laparotomy and the group "LAC" included 30 patients who underwent laparoscopy. All data were analyzed using SPSS software version 19.0.

RESULTS

Our study showed that there was no significant difference in short-term outcomes between the 2 groups, namely intraoperative morbidity, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay as well as postoperative morbidity and mortality. Regarding the long-term outcomes, there was also no significant difference in the incidence of late complications, type of recurrence, overall survival and disease-free survival. Oncological safety based on the limits of resection and the number of lymph nodes removed was not significantly different between the two groups. Operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (p <0.001). Convertion rate was 33%. It went from 67% in the first 2 years of the study to 13% in the last 2 years. The conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy had no significant impact neither on early postoperative outcomes nor on overall survival and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy is a surgical procedure resulting in at least equivalent short and long term outcomes as laparotomy. The learning curve representing a "prerequisite" has no negative impact on the outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of non-metastatic colic cancers.

No benefit of extended mesenteric resection with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer

AIM

The optimal extent of mesenteric resection in colon cancer surgery is not known. We have previously shown an increased mortality associated with wider mesenteric resection in right hemicolectomy. This study compares the short- and long-term outcome in three variations of right hemicolectomy based on the position of the vascular ligature in the mesentery.

METHOD

In all, 2084 cases of cancer in the caecum or ascending colon were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and categorized according to the position of the vascular ligature: central ligation of ileocolic vessels (ICVs) ± right colic vessels (n = 390), central ligation of ICVs + right branch of middle colic vessels (MCVs) (n = 1360) and central ligation of ICVs + central ligation of MCVs (n = 334).

RESULTS

Neither 3-year overall survival, 3-year disease-free survival nor local recurrence rate differed between the groups (P = 0.604; P = 0.247; P = 0.237). There was still no difference after multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, TNM stage and adjuvant therapy. An increased peri-operative mortality, however, was observed in extended mesenteric resections, increasing from 0.8% in non-extended to 3.6% in more extended resection, P = 0.025.

CONCLUSION

The study showed no survival benefit by more extended mesenteric resection, indicating that there is no need to extend the mesenteric resection to involve the MCVs in cancer of the caecum or ascending colon. On the contrary, increased peri-operative mortality by more extensive mesenteric resection was noted suggesting that a more conservative approach may be favourable.

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in colon cancer is independent of resection length

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio (LNR), the ratio of tumor-positive lymph nodes (+LN) to the total number of resected lymph nodes (rLN), predicts recurrence and survival in colon cancer. Variations in colonic resection length (RL) may influence rLN, +LN, or both, thereby potentially impacting LNR and its prognostic value in colon cancer.

METHODS

All colon cancer patients treated surgically at our center from 2004 to 2011 were included in an institutional review board-approved data repository (n = 1,039).

RESULTS

Larger RL was associated with increased rLN (ρ = .22; P < .001) but not with +LN (P = .21). In node-positive patients (n = 411), RL-adjusted LNR had weaker correlations with death (ρ = .338 vs .373, both P < .001) or metastatic disease (ρ = .303 vs .345; both P < .001) and a smaller area under the curve (death: .695 vs .715, metastasis: .675 vs .699). Findings were similar in segmental, extended segmental, and total colectomy subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Provided that resections are performed following standard oncologic principles, our analysis shows that RL does not significantly impact the prognostic value of LNR in colon cancer. Correcting LNR for RL seems redundant and may even act as noise distorting LNR values.

Complete mesocolic excision and extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer: is it worth that extra effort? A review of the literature

PURPOSE

Recent interest in complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) or extended (D3) lymphadenectomy (EL) for curative resection of colon cancer has been driven by published series from experienced practitioners showing excellent survival outcomes and low recurrence rates. In this article, we attempt to clarify the role of CME or EL in modern colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A narrative review of the evidence for CME and EL in the curative treatment of colon cancer.

RESULTS

The principal of CME surgery, similar to total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, is the removal of all lymphatic, vascular, and neural tissue in the drainage area of the tumour in a complete mesocolic envelope with intact mesentery, peritoneum and encasing fascia. Extended (D3) lymphadenectomy (EL) is based on similar principles. Sound anatomical and oncological arguments are made to support the principles of removing the tumor contained within an intact mesocolic facial envelope together with an extended lymph node harvest. Excellent oncological outcomes with minimal morbidity and mortality have been reported. This has led to calls for the standardisation of surgery for colon cancer using CME. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the prognostic benefit of greater lymph node harvests and the evidence for an oncological benefit of CME is limited by methodology flaws and several potential confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is a reasonable anatomical and oncological basis for these techniques, there are no randomised controlled trials from which to draw confident conclusions and there is insufficient consistent high quality evidence to recommend widespread adoption of CME.

Current considerations in colorectal cancer surgery

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. The last decades improvement in survival in all stages of the disease has been achieved. Many factors contributes to this improvement; earlier diagnosis, better pre-operative staging, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, better surgical method and approach, introduction of pre- and post-operative multidisciplinary team conferences and adjuvant chemotherapy. Currently, new modalities are developing; robotics and organ preserving through wait-and-watch will give colorectal surgeons even more treatment options. This article highlights important aspects of colorectal cancer management now and in the future.

Influence of extent of lymph node dissection on survival for patients with pT2 colon cancer

PURPOSE

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection for early-stage colon cancer (CC) remains undefined. This study assessed the influence of the extent of lymph node dissection on overall survival (OS) in patients with pT2 CC.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined data from the multi-institutional registry system of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and used a propensity score matching method to balance potential confounders of lymph node dissection. We extracted 463 matched pairs from 1433 patients who underwent major resections for pT2 CC between 1995 and 2004.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis was found in 301 (21.0%) of 1433 patients with pT2 CC. In this cohort, significant independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis were lymphatic invasion and venous invasion. Patients who underwent D3 or D2 lymph node dissection did not significantly differ in OS, either among the propensity score-matched cohort (estimated hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.536-1.346, P = 0.484) or in the cohort as a whole (HR 0.720, 95% CI 0.492-1.052, P = 0.089).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with pT2 CC, D3 lymph node dissection did not add to OS. D2 lymph node dissection may be adequate for pT2 CC.

Effect of left colonic artery preservation on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

High morbidity rates related to anastomotic leakage and other factors restrict the application of laparoscopic rectal excision. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of left colonic artery (LCA) preservation on postoperative complications after laparoscopic rectal excision.

METHODS

Data from 888 patients from 28 leading hospitals in Japan who underwent laparoscopic-assisted sphincter-preserving resection of middle and low rectal cancers between 1994 and 2006 were analyzed. The effects of LCA preservation were analyzed among all anterior resection (AR) cases (n = 888) and among AR cases with radical lymph node excision (n = 411).

RESULTS

Among all AR cases, the tumor size, number of lymph nodes collected with evidence of metastasis, TNM factor, and TNM staging were smaller in the LCA preservation group. Regarding complications, the rate of anastomotic leak was significantly higher in the LCA non-preservation group among all AR cases, as well as among AR cases with radical lymph node excision. Nevertheless, there was no difference in survival rate between LCA preservation group and non-preservation group, as measured by the Kaplan-Meier method.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the preservation of the LCA in laparoscopic AR for middle and low rectal cancer is associated with lower anastomotic leak rates.

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision: West meets East

Complete mesocolic excision is a relatively new concept in western literature. It follows the same concept of total mesorectal excision and units’ routinely performing complete mesocolic excisions have good pathological results as well as good improvements in overall survival, disease free survival and local recurrence. And yet unlike total mesorectal excision, uptake in the West has been relatively slow with many units sceptical of the true benefits gained by taking up a more technically challenging and potentially more morbid procedure when there is a paucity of literature to support these claims. This article reviews complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer, attempting to identify the risks and benefits of the technique and particularly looking at the reasons why its uptake has not been universal. It also discusses the similarities of a complete mesocolic excision to a colon resection with a D3 lymphadenectomy as well as the role of a laparoscopic approach to this technique. Considering a D3 lymphadenectomy has been the standard of care for stage II and III colon cancers in many of our Asian neighbours for over 20 years, combining this data with data on complete mesocolic excision may provide enough evidence to support or refute the need for complete mesocolic excisions. Maybe there might be lessons to be learnt from our colleagues in the east.

Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review

AIM

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) and extended lympha-denectomy (EL) have been proposed as safe procedures for improving colon cancer survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence regarding oncological outcomes, morbidity and mortality after such techniques for colon cancer.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate evidence regarding oncological outcomes, morbidity and mortality after CME or EL. Three major databases (PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library) were searched. The review included original articles reporting outcomes after CME or EL from January 1950 to July 2012.

RESULTS

Twenty-one, predominately retrospective, studies involving 5246 patients (mean age 68.2 years, 56.5% men) were included. Reporting of outcomes was inconsistent. Median follow up was 60 months. The operative mortality rate was 3.2% and the cumulative morbidity rate was 21.5%. The weighted mean local recurrence rate and the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 4.5%, 58.1% and 77.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The available data for CME and EL have numerous fundamental limitations that prohibit adoption. Contemporary controlled studies are required before universal recommendation.

Wide excision in right-sided colon cancer is associated with decreased survival

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Nodal involvement is the most important prognostic factor in colon cancer. Although theoretically appealing, it is not known if wider mesenteric excision improves the oncological result. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether wider mesenteric excision yields a superior oncological result.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Depending on the resection length, 333 cases of locally radical right-sided hemicolectomies due to adenocarcinoma were compared for perioperative morbidity and mortality, disease-free survival, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in the quartile with the longest resections, p = 0.003. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age, stage, emergency operation, adjuvant chemotherapy, and year of operation, a negative relationship between resection length and 5-year overall survival was noted, p = 0.01. No differences in the causes of death or in the incidence of local or distant recurrences were noted between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Wider excision in right-sided hemicolectomies was not associated with any oncological benefit but an increased postoperative mortality and a decreased 5-year overall survival. These findings may suggest consideration to perform wide mesenteric resections routinely. Further research is warranted to define which patients benefit from wider resections.

Impact of age on the quality of lymphadenectomy for colorectal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of patient age on the number of lymph nodes dissected during surgery for colorectal cancer. Clinical and histopathological data of 231 consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into those aged ≤70 years and >70 years. Our findings suggest that patient's age influences the number of lymph nodes detected in surgical specimens; this number was lower in patients aged >70 years and decreased with further aging.

Laparoscopic resection for sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer performed by trainees: impact on short-term outcomes and selection of suitable patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed (1) to evaluate the impact of clinical factors, particularly operation by trainees, on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for sigmoid and rectosigmoid cancer, and (2) to determine patients suitable for operation by trainees.

METHODS

From a prospectively maintained single-institution database, we identified 133 patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for sigmoid or rectosigmoid cancer between 2007 and 2010. Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), previous abdominal surgery, tumor location, tumor size, tumor stage, extent of lymph node dissection, and primary surgeon were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the predictive significance of these variables on surgical outcomes including operative time, blood loss, complication, postoperative stay, and retrieved lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that location of the tumor in the rectosigmoid (p < 0.001), higher BMI (p < 0.001), operation by trainees (p < 0.001), male gender (p = 0.002), and greater tumor depth (p = 0.011) were independently predictive of longer operative time. Larger tumor size (p = 0.025) and higher BMI (p = 0.040) were independently predictive of greater blood loss. Larger tumor size was also related to longer postoperative stay (p = 0.001) and a greater number of retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified operation by trainees as an independent risk factor for longer operative time but with no negative impact on any of the other outcomes. Female patients with a low BMI, sigmoid cancer, shallow tumor depth, and/or small tumor are suitable for operation by trainees.

Current clinical status of sentinel lymph nodes in colon and proximal rectal cancer

The postoperative report of the lymph node status of colorectal cancer in clinical practice is not a given fact. Among other factors, it is dependent on the experience and technique of the surgeon as well as the pathologist. Therefore a method like sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) that identifies and provides for analysis the lymph node at highest risk for tumour involvement would be highly beneficial. Unlike in breast cancer or melanoma, SLNB is more difficult to apply in colorectal cancer and is still not ready for clinical routine application for these tumor entities. However, careful patient selection and expertise of the involved specialists can improve the quality and results of SLNB in colorectal cancer. Especially in the early stage cancer patients, SLNB may be helpful to identify the earliest signs of lymphatic dissemination (thereby upstaging the patient) or to encourage a limited extent of resection.

Apical lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in distal colorectal cancer: an analysis of the risk of tumor involvement and the impact of high ligation on anastomotic integrity

BACKGROUND

What level of arterial ligation is best in left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer remains controversial. This study aims to assess the necessity and risk of high ligation from an oncological and technical perspective.

METHODS

The lymph nodes at the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) were separated as apical nodes in all patients operated for distal colorectal cancer in our department. The number and status of the nodes were prospectively assessed, and demographic and tumor-related variables were evaluated as risk factors for apical tumor invasion. Anastomotic leaks were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A hundred and three patients (52 [50.5%] males, 60.3+/-12.9 years old) were included. The number of non-apical lymph nodes harvested was 14.5+/-7.1 with an additional 4.4+/-3.2 apical nodes at the high ligation site. Tumor invasion of apical nodes was observed in 6 (5.8%) patients. Two of these (1.9%) had no other positive nodes (skip metastases). Although none of the variables evaluated was found significant for predicting apical node positivity, tumor invasion was detected in 8.5 and 22.2% of patients with pT3 and pN2 cancers, respectively. Among patients, who had an anastomosis (n = 84, 81.6%), anastomotic leak was observed in 7(8.3%) and 1 (1.2%) of these patients required emergency relaparotomy. There was no mortality related to high ligation.

CONCLUSIONS

High ligation of IMA may be routinely performed in patients with distal colorectal cancer, since tumor invasion of apical lymph nodes is neither rare (>5%) nor predictable, and skip metastases may also occur. This is especially true in case of an advanced disease for which apical node positivity peaks. The anastomotic leak rate is less than 10%, and mortality is low after high ligation of IMA.

Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes examined in colon cancer surgery: clinical application beyond simple measurement

OBJECTIVE

To identify an optimal cutoff value for the number of lymph node examined (NLNE) to distinguish the prognoses in patients following a curative resection for advanced colon cancer, to clarify the mechanism of the difference, and to suggest the integration of NLNE to colon cancer staging.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 859 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for localized colon cancer from 1980 to 2000 were reviewed. This was a cohort from a single institution with mean NLNE of 20.7 and more than 12 NLNE in 77% of the patients. The optimal breakpoint for NLNE was calculated by a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The patients were stratified into groups based on various parameters and underwent univariate and multivariate analyses with respect to survival.

RESULTS

The ROC analysis identified NLNE as a significant prognostic factor with cutoff value of 18 for node-negative and 20 for node-positive patients. A multivariate analysis with these cutoff values identified NLNE as a significant prognostic factor independent of tumor depth and the number of lymph nodes involved. The 5-year cause-specific survival of stage IIB patients was 96.5% with 18 or more NLNE and 67.5% with NLNE less than 18 (P[r]=0.0067). Similarly, a cutoff value of 20 NLNE for node-positive patients separated the 5-year cause-specific survival of stage IIIB patients into 79.3% with 20 or more NLNE and 63.3% with less than 20 NLNE (P=0.0052).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical significance of NLNE is not limited to being a benchmark for quality care, but has a definite benefit as a prognostic indicator across the stages. Patients could be stratified more efficiently by the integration of NLNE to TNM staging.

[Not Available]

F. Lacaine Lymph node metastasis carries enormous prognostic weight in the evaluation of colon cancer and raises the question of how extensive a lymph node dissection should be. Lymph node dissection has several goals: 1) staging of the cancer at the time of intervention; 2) improving the chances for complete resection and cure; 3) evaluating the thoroughness and quality of a particular surgical procedure. The prognostic value of lymphadenectomy is evident from the direct practical decisions it entails: evidence-based recommendations (Level A) have proposed adjuvant chemotherapy for all patients with Stage III colon cancer since 1990. Studies have shown a statistically significant correlation between the number of nodes examined in an operative specimen and long-term survival in patients with Stage II disease. The more closely lymph nodes are examined, the more metastasis is found; one can then see the aberrations of stage migration described as the "Will Rogers Phenomenon." Without randomized studies, it is impossible to say whether resection of a larger number of lymph nodes actually improves the prognosis or whether that number is simply a marker of better surgical management including the quality of the surgical gesture, the careful pathologic examination of the specimen, and subsequent choices for adjuvant chemotherapy. The recovery of 12 lymph nodes correlates with a better global prognosis. At the very least, it is an effective marker for the quality of the surgical resection and can be used in the evaluation of professional practice.

[Not Available]

F. Lacaine Lymph node metastasis carries enormous prognostic weight in the evaluation of colon cancer and raises the question of how extensive a lymph node dissection should be. Lymph node dissection has several goals: 1) staging of the cancer at the time of intervention; 2) improving the chances for complete resection and cure; 3) evaluating the thoroughness and quality of a particular surgical procedure. The prognostic value of lymphadenectomy is evident from the direct practical decisions it entails: evidence-based recommendations (Level A) have proposed adjuvant chemotherapy for all patients with Stage III colon cancer since 1990. Studies have shown a statistically significant correlation between the number of nodes examined in an operative specimen and long-term survival in patients with Stage II disease. The more closely lymph nodes are examined, the more metastasis is found; one can then see the aberrations of stage migration described as the "Will Rogers Phenomenon." Without randomized studies, it is impossible to say whether resection of a larger number of lymph nodes actually improves the prognosis or whether that number is simply a marker of better surgical management including the quality of the surgical gesture, the careful pathologic examination of the specimen, and subsequent choices for adjuvant chemotherapy. The recovery of 12 lymph nodes correlates with a better global prognosis. At the very least, it is an effective marker for the quality of the surgical resection and can be used in the evaluation of professional practice.

A 6-year review of surgical morbidity and oncological outcome after high anterior resection for colorectal malignancy with and without splenic flexure mobilization

OBJECTIVE

High anterior resection (HAR) for colorectal cancer is traditionally performed with routine mobilization of the splenic flexure. This is a retrospective review of mortality and morbidity following HAR in which the splenic flexure has been preserved.

METHOD

From a prospective database, all patients who had undergone elective HAR for colorectal cancer between 1999 and 2005 were identified. Morbidity, mortality, pathology and survival data for patients having HAR with and without splenic flexure mobilization were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 707 patients were identified. Five hundred and thirty-one had HAR with preservation of the splenic flexure. In these patients outcome was: anastomotic leak (0.4%), wound infection (3.6%), anastomotic stricture (0.4%) and 30-day mortality (0.9%). No statistical significant difference was found for postoperative morbidity (P = 0.1926), 30-day mortality (P =0.3285), lymph node harvest (P = 0.2127) or survival (P = 0.1457) compared with patients in whom the splenic flexure was mobilized. Longitudinal resection margins were greater following HAR with splenic flexure mobilization (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

No morbidity, oncological or survival disadvantage in performing splenic flexure preserving HAR was found.