Measuring and Predicting Service Providers' Use of an Evidence-Based Parenting Program

Comparative efficacy of the Triple P program on parenting practices and family violence against children

BACKGROUND

The Triple P - Positive Parenting Program was rolled-out in two communities in Quebec, Canada, in order to prevent child maltreatment.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Evaluate the effects of Triple P versus care as usual on positive parenting practices, dysfunctional disciplinary practices, and family violence towards the child; (2) verify whether the observed changes persisted over time.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

A quasi-experimental protocol with an active comparison group was used. Participants were 384 parents or parental figures of at least one 0-12-year-old child, assigned to one of two groups: Triple P (n = 291) and Care as usual (n = 93). We conducted a follow-up study with 164 parents from the Triple P group.

METHODS

We administered questionnaires at pretest, post-test, and follow-up. Standardized instruments measured positive parenting practices, dysfunctional disciplinary practices (overreactivity, laxness, hostility), and family violence towards the child (repeated psychological aggression, minor physical violence). The intervention dose received by each parent was calculated from data provided by practitioners.

RESULTS

Belonging to the Triple P group was associated with increased positive practices and decreased overreactive and hostile discipline. A higher dose of intervention was associated with a decrease in laxness. All observed changes were maintained at follow-up, with medium (η²_p = 0.073, hostility₎ to large (η²_p = 0.271, overreactivity) effect sizes. Also, Triple P was more effective in reducing minor physical violence, this effect persisting over time (from 36 % to 21 %).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the sustainable efficacy of the Triple P parenting program, except for repeated psychological aggression towards children.

Predicting the Sustained Implementation of an Evidence-Based Parenting Program: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach

PURPOSE

Sustained implementation is required for evidence-based parenting programs to promote children and their families' wellbeing at the societal level. Previous literature has examined the role of a range of different factors in enhancing sustainability. However, the inter-relationship between, and the relative importance of different factors remain largely unknown. The overall aim of this study is to identify predictors of sustained program use, the relative importance of factors, and potential mediation pathways.

METHODS

We surveyed 1202 practitioners who were trained in at least one variant of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program, at least one and half years before data collection. The present data were linked with data collected during professional training. We first examined the independent effect of each factor on sustained program use, then, developed and evaluated a structural equation model of sustained program use.

RESULTS

The structural equation model explained a considerable amount of variance in sustained program use, with seven positive predictors and one negative predictor identified. Organisational support was identified as a key facilitator, which was not only positively linked with other facilitators but also had an independent positive effect. Perceived usefulness of the program was the most important practitioner-level facilitator, which might be contributed by both research-based evidence and practice-based evidence. Practitioners' self-regulation in program delivery impacted sustained use by influencing other factors such as perceived usefulness of the program.

CONCLUSION

The findings provided insight into factors influencing the sustainability of evidence-based parenting programs which could be used to inform future implementation practice.

How do Lay Health Worker Engage Caregivers? A Qualitative Study to Enhance Equity in Evidence-Based Parenting Programs

Engaging caregivers in their children's mental health treatment is critical for delivering high quality, evidence-based care, particularly for young children with externalizing behaviors. Lay health workers (LHWs), including peer providers and promotoras de salud, have been identified as important workforces in addressing structural and stigma-related barriers to engagement in mental health services. Importantly, research has suggested that LHWs may be integral in efforts to address engagement disparities in evidence-based behavioral parent training programs (BPTs) for Latinx caregivers. The purpose of the study was to understand how different LHW workforces engage caregivers within their usual services, in order to inform strategies that improve access to and engagement in BPTs. Qualitative interviews were conducted with two different LHW workforces: volunteer LHWs (i.e., promotoras de salud) (n = 14), who were part of a community-embedded network, and paid LHWs (i.e., parent support partners, home visitors) (n = 9) embedded within children's mental health agencies. Participants were predominately Latinx (79%) and female (96%). Qualitative analyses revealed three primary themes related to engagement strategies used by LHWs to address barriers to care: 1.) Building Trust, 2.) Empowerment, 3.) Increasing Access. Although the majority of themes and sub-themes were consistent across the two LHW workforces, agency-embedded LHWs often discussed having the means to provide resources through their organizations, whereas community-embedded LHWs discussed acting as a bridge to services by providing information and conducting outreach. Findings have implications for partnering with different workforces of LHWs to increase equity in access to BPTs.

Train-to-Sustain: Predictors of Sustainment in a Large-Scale Implementation of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy

Sustainment of evidence-based practices is necessary to ensure their public health impact. The current study examined predictors of sustainment of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) within a large-scale system-driven implementation effort in Los Angeles County. Data were drawn from PCIT training data and county administrative claims between January 2013 and March 2018. Participants included 241 therapists from 61 programs. Two sustainment outcomes were examined at the therapist- and program-levels: 1) PCIT claim volume and 2) PCIT claim discontinuation (discontinuation of claims during study period; survival time of claiming in months). Predictors included therapist- and program-level caseload, training, and workforce characteristics. On average, therapists and programs continued claiming to PCIT for 17.7 and 32.3 months, respectively. Across the sustainment outcomes, there were both shared and unshared significant predictors. For therapists, case-mix fit (higher proportions of young child clients with externalizing disorders) and participation in additional PCIT training activities significantly predicted claims volume. Furthermore, additional training activity participation was associated with lower likelihood of therapist PCIT claim discontinuation in the follow-up period. Programs with therapists eligible to be internal trainers were significantly less likely to discontinue PCIT claiming. Findings suggest that PCIT sustainment may be facilitated by implementation strategies including targeted outreach to ensure eligible families in therapist caseloads, facilitating therapist engagement in advanced trainings, and building internal infrastructure through train-the-trainer programs.