1
|
Racz JI, Bialocerkowski A, Calteaux I, Farrell LJ. Determinants of Exposure Therapy Implementation in Clinical Practice for the Treatment of Anxiety, OCD, and PTSD: A Systematic Review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2024; 27:317-341. [PMID: 38630196 PMCID: PMC11222222 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00478-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Exposure therapy (ET) forms a vital part of effective psychotherapy for anxiety-related presentations including anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and is often underutilised in clinical practice. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), this systematic review synthesised existing literature on the determinants of ET implementation for anxiety-related presentations and examined differences across presentations and developmental subgroups. Fifty-two eligible studies were assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, with 389 results (99%) mapped onto the TDF. Results suggested that clinicians' negative beliefs about the consequences of ET were commonly associated with reduced implementation. It also appeared that whilst broad unspecified ET training may be related to improved implementation for anxiety disorders; greater implementation for complex presentations (i.e., PTSD) likely requires more specialised training involving practical components. A subset of domains (e.g., social/professional role and identity) accounted for most results, whilst some remain unexplored (i.e., optimism; reinforcement; memory, attention, and decision processes) or underexplored (i.e., behavioural regulation). Likewise, specific presentations and developmental subgroups (i.e., PTSD and adults) represented a greater proportion of results in the literature than others (i.e., OCD and youth). Future research exploring ET implementation, across specific presentations and developmental subgroups, would benefit from integrating implementation science frameworks to guide the development of targeted, comprehensive strategies to close the research-practice gap of ET for the treatment of anxiety-related presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J I Racz
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.
| | | | - I Calteaux
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - L J Farrell
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Woodard GS, Casline E, Ehrenreich-May J, Ginsburg GS, Jensen-Doss A. Consultation as an Implementation Strategy to Increase Fidelity of Measurement-Based Care Delivery in Community Mental Health Settings: An Observational Study. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2023:10.1007/s10488-023-01321-7. [PMID: 38052929 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01321-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
Regularly administering outcome measures to clients to inform clinical decision making, referred to as measurement-based care (MBC), has the potential to improve mental health treatment due to its applicability across disorders and treatment settings. Given the utility of MBC, understanding predictors of high-fidelity MBC implementation is important. Training and consultation are widely used implementation strategies to increase the fidelity of evidence-based practice delivery but have rarely been studied with MBC. The current study will examine the relationship between time clinicians spent discussing a case in consultation ("dosage") and MBC fidelity. Thirty clinicians and 56 youth were in the MBC condition of a randomized controlled trial and completed baseline questionnaires. Consultation dosage was extracted from call notes. MBC fidelity was measured using the implementation index, which combines rates of administering and viewing questionnaires, using objective data from the online MBC system. Multi-level modeling was used. Greater consultation dosage significantly predicted a higher implementation index (ß = 0.27, SE = 0.06, p < .001). For every 30 min spent discussing a case in consultation, the case's MBC fidelity increased by 8.1%. Greater consultation dosage significantly predicted higher rates of administration (ß = 0.07, SE = 0.03, p = 0.033) and feedback report viewing (ß = 0.24, SE = 0.06, p < .001). More consultation at the case level predicts greater MBC fidelity using objective measures. The greatest impact was increasing the clinician feedback report viewing rate. The results of this study can help inform future efforts to increase the fidelity with which MBC is delivered and to make consultation as efficient and effective as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace S Woodard
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248185, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Casline
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E. Superior Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Jill Ehrenreich-May
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248185, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Golda S Ginsburg
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 65 Kane Street Room 3022, West Hartford, CT, 06119, USA
| | - Amanda Jensen-Doss
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248185, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Frank HE, Rifkin LS, Sheehan K, Becker-Haimes E, Crane ME, Phillips KE, Palitz SA, Kemp J, Benito K, Kendall PC. Therapist perceptions of experiential training for exposure therapy. Behav Cogn Psychother 2023; 51:214-229. [PMID: 36805734 PMCID: PMC11006093 DOI: 10.1017/s1352465822000728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite evidence for its efficacy, exposure therapy for anxiety is rarely used in routine care settings. Efforts to address one major barrier to its use - therapists' negative beliefs about exposure - have included therapist-level implementation strategies, such as training and consultation. Experiential training, in which therapists themselves undergo exposures, has recently demonstrated feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness for increasing exposure use. AIMS This study aimed to assess: (1) therapists' perceptions of experiential training and (2) barriers and facilitators to implementing exposure following training. METHOD Therapists who underwent experiential training (n=12) completed qualitative interviews and quantitative questionnaires. Interviews were coded using an integrated approach, combining both inductive and deductive approaches. Mixed methods analyses examined how themes varied by practice setting (community mental health versus private practice) and exposure use. RESULTS Results highlight how therapist-level factors, such as clinician self-efficacy, interact with inner- and outer-setting factors. Participants reported positive perceptions of exposure after training; they noted that directly addressing myths about exposure and experiencing exposures themselves improved their attitudes toward exposure. Consistent with prior literature, issues such as insufficient supervisory support, organizational constraints, and client characteristics made it challenging to implement exposures. DISCUSSION Results highlight the benefits of experiential training, while also highlighting the need to consider contextual determinants. Differences in responses across practice settings highlight areas for intervention and the importance of tailoring implementation strategies. Barriers that were specific to therapists who did not use exposure (e.g. hesitancy about its appropriateness for most clients) point to directions for future implementation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah E. Frank
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University
- Bradley Hospital, Lifespan Health System
- Department of Psychology, Temple University
| | | | - Kate Sheehan
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University
- Bradley Hospital, Lifespan Health System
| | - Emily Becker-Haimes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania
- Hall Mercer Community Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania Health System
| | | | | | | | - Joshua Kemp
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University
- Bradley Hospital, Lifespan Health System
| | - Kristen Benito
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University
- Bradley Hospital, Lifespan Health System
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Milgram L, Freeman JB, Benito KG, Elwy AR, Frank HE. Clinician-Reported Determinants of Evidence-Based Practice Use in Private Practice Mental Health. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10879-022-09551-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
5
|
Becker-Haimes EM, Klein CC, Frank HE, Oquendo MA, Jager-Hyman S, Brown GK, Brady M, Barnett ML. Clinician Maladaptive Anxious Avoidance in the Context of Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions: A Commentary. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:833214. [PMID: 36382152 PMCID: PMC9648711 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.833214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
This paper posits that a clinician's own anxious reaction to delivering specific evidence-based interventions (EBIs) should be better accounted for within implementation science frameworks. A key next step for implementation science is to delineate the causal processes most likely to influence successful implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs). This is critical for being able to develop tailored implementation strategies that specifically target mechanisms by which implementation succeeds or fails. First, we review the literature on specific EBIs that may act as negatively valenced stimuli for clinicians, leading to a process of clinician maladaptive anxious avoidance that can negatively impact EBI delivery. In the following sections, we argue that there are certain EBIs that can cause emotional distress or discomfort in a clinician, related to either: (1) a clinicians' fear of the real or predicted short-term distress the EBI can cause patients, or (2) fears that the clinician will inadvertently cause the patient harm and/or face liability. This distress experienced by the clinician can perpetuate a cycle of maladaptive anxious avoidance by the clinician, contributing to lack of or suboptimal EBI implementation. We illustrate how this cycle of maladaptive anxious avoidance can influence implementation by providing several examples from leading EBIs in the psychosocial literature. To conclude, we discuss how leveraging decades of treatment literature aimed at mitigating maladaptive anxious avoidance can inform the design of more tailored and effective implementation strategies for EBIs that are negatively valenced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M. Becker-Haimes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Hall Mercer Community Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Corinna C. Klein
- Department of Counseling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
| | - Hannah E. Frank
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
- Bradley Hospital, Lifespan Health System, Riverside, RI, United States
| | - Maria A. Oquendo
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Shari Jager-Hyman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Gregory K. Brown
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Megan Brady
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Miya L. Barnett
- Department of Counseling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davis M, Hoskins K, Phan M, Hoffacker C, Reilly M, Fugo PB, Young JF, Beidas RS. Screening Adolescents for Sensitive Health Topics in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. J Adolesc Health 2022; 70:706-713. [PMID: 34955356 PMCID: PMC9038619 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
We sought to aggregate common barriers and facilitators to screening adolescents for sensitive health topics (e.g., depression, chlamydia) in primary care, as well as those that are unique to a given health topic. We conducted a literature search of three databases (PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and CINAHL) and reference lists of included articles. Studies focused on barriers and facilitators to screening adolescents (ages 12-17 years) for sensitive health topics in primary care that are recommended by national guidelines. Articles were peer-reviewed, presented empirical data, and were published in English in 2006-2021. We coded barriers and facilitators using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, a well-established framework within implementation science. In total, 39 studies met inclusion criteria and spanned several health topics: depression, suicide, substance use, HIV, and chlamydia. We found common barriers and facilitators to screening across health topics, with most relating to characteristics of the primary care clinics (e.g., time constraints). Other factors relevant to screening implementation ranged from confidentiality concerns to clinician knowledge. Barriers and facilitators specific to certain health topics, such as the availability of on-site laboratories for HIV screening, were also noted. Findings can guide refinements to screening implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Davis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Katelin Hoskins
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;,Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mary Phan
- Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
| | - Carlin Hoffacker
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Megan Reilly
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Perrin B. Fugo
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jami F. Young
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, USA and PolicyLab, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rinad S. Beidas
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;,Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;,Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;,Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;,Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Becker-Haimes EM, Mandell DS, Fishman J, Williams NJ, Wolk CB, Wislocki K, Reich D, Schaechter T, Brady M, Maples NJ, Creed TA. Assessing Causal Pathways and Targets of Implementation Variability for EBP use (Project ACTIVE): a study protocol. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:144. [PMID: 34930483 PMCID: PMC8686333 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00245-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advancing causal implementation theory is critical for designing tailored implementation strategies that target specific mechanisms associated with evidence-based practice (EBP) use. This study will test the generalizability of a conceptual model that integrates organizational constructs and behavioral theory to predict clinician use of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques in community mental health centers. CBT is a leading psychosocial EBP for psychiatric disorders that remains underused despite substantial efforts to increase its implementation. Methods We will leverage ongoing CBT implementation efforts in two large public health systems (Philadelphia and Texas) to recruit 300 mental health clinicians and 600 of their clients across 40 organizations. Our primary implementation outcomes of interest are clinician intentions to use CBT and direct observation of clinician use of CBT. As CBT comprises discrete components that vary in complexity and acceptability, we will measure clinician use of six discrete components of CBT. After finishing their CBT training, participating clinicians will complete measures of organizational and behavior change constructs delineated in the model. Clinicians also will be observed twice via audio recording delivering CBT with a client. Within 48 h of each observation, theorized moderators of the intention-behavior gap will be collected via survey. A subset of clinicians who report high intentions to use CBT but demonstrate low use will be purposively recruited to complete semi-structured interviews assessing reasons for the intention-behavior gap. Multilevel path analysis will test the extent to which intentions and determinants of intention predict the use of each discrete CBT component. We also will test the extent to which theorized determinants of intention that include psychological, organizational, and contextual factors explain variation in intention and moderate the association between intentions and CBT use. Discussion Project ACTIVE will advance implementation theory, currently in its infancy, by testing the generalizability of a promising causal model of implementation. These results will inform the development of implementation strategies targeting modifiable factors that explain substantial variance in intention and implementation that can be applied broadly across EBPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M Becker-Haimes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. .,Hall Mercer Community Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - David S Mandell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Jessica Fishman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Message Effects Laboratory, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Courtney Benjamin Wolk
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Katherine Wislocki
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Danielle Reich
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Temma Schaechter
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Megan Brady
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Natalie J Maples
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Torrey A Creed
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Woodard GS, Triplett NS, Frank HE, Harrison JP, Robinson S, Dorsey S. The impact of implementation climate on community mental health clinicians’ attitudes toward exposure: An evaluation of the effects of training and consultation. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2021; 2. [PMID: 36210960 PMCID: PMC9536473 DOI: 10.1177/26334895211057883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Most evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety disorders include exposure; however, in community settings, the implementation of exposure lags behind other EBT components. Clinician-level determinants have been consistently implicated as barriers to exposure implementation, but few organizational determinants have been studied. The current study examines an organization-level determinant, implementation climate, and clinician-level determinants, clinician demographic and background factors, as predictors of attitudes toward exposure and changes in attitudes following training. Method: Clinicians (n = 197) completed a 3-day training with 6 months of twice-monthly consultation. Clinicians were trained in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety, depression, behavior problems, and trauma-focused CBT (TF-CBT). Demographic and background information, implementation climate, and attitudes toward exposure were assessed in a pre-training survey; attitudes were reassessed at post-consultation. Implementation climate was measured at the aggregated/group-level and clinician-level. Results: Attitudes toward exposure significantly improved from pre-training to post-consultation (t(193) = 9.9, p < .001; d = 0.71). Clinician-level implementation climate scores did not predict more positive attitudes at pre-training (p > .05) but did predict more positive attitudes at post-consultation (ß = −2.46; p < .05) and greater changes in those attitudes (ß = 2.28; p < .05). Group-level implementation climate scores did not predict attitudes at pre-training, post-consultation, or changes in attitudes (all ps > .05). Higher frequency of self-reported CBT use was associated with more positive attitudes at pre-training (ß = −0.81; p < .05), but no other clinician demographic or background determinants were associated with attitudes at post-consultation (all p > .05) or with changes in attitudes (all p > .05). Conclusions: Clinician perceptions of implementation climate predicted greater improvement of attitudes toward exposure following EBT training and consultation. Findings suggest that organizational determinants outside of training impact changes in clinicians’ attitudes. Training in four EBTs, only two of which include exposure as a component, resulted in positive changes in clinicians’ attitudes toward exposure, which suggests non-specialty trainings can be effective at changing attitudes, which may enable scale-up. Exposure is highly effective for treating trauma symptoms and anxiety-based disorders, but it is not commonly used in community mental health settings. Clinicians who endorsed higher expectations, support, and rewards for using exposure in their agency had more positive attitudes toward exposure after training and consultation. Additionally, clinicians who endorsed that exposure is expected, supported, and rewarded in their agency showed a greater improvement in attitudes throughout the training process. Organizational culture can affect clinicians’ attitude changes in the training process, and therefore should become a focus of training efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace S. Woodard
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Noah S. Triplett
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hannah E. Frank
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Julie P. Harrison
- Department of Psychiatry, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA
| | - Sophia Robinson
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Shannon Dorsey
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sijercic I, Lane JEM, Gutner CA, Monson CM, Stirman SW. The Association Between Clinician and Perceived Organizational Factors with Early Fidelity to Cognitive Processing Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in a Randomized Controlled Implementation Trial. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021; 47:8-18. [PMID: 31463667 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-019-00966-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A common metric for determining implementation success is the measurement of clinician adherence to, and competence in, delivering a psychotherapy. The present study examined clinician and organizational factors as predictors of early adherence and competence among 78 clinicians delivering cognitive processing therapy (CPT), an evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for posttraumatic stress disorder, in a randomized controlled implementation trial. Results indicated that clinicians' willingness to adopt an EBP if required to do so was significantly associated with early adherence and competence in CPT delivery. Level of clinician education was significantly associated with early competence in delivering CPT. Organizational factors did not predict early adherence or competence. Implications of the findings are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
- National Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System & Stanford University, 795 Willow Road, NC-PTSD 334, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aarons GA, Conover KL, Ehrhart MG, Torres EM, Reeder K. Leader–member exchange and organizational climate effects on clinician turnover intentions. J Health Organ Manag 2020; 35:68-87. [DOI: 10.1108/jhom-10-2019-0311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeClinician turnover in mental health settings impacts service quality, including availability and delivery of evidence-based practices. Leadership is associated with organizational climate, team functioning and clinician turnover intentions (TI). This study examines leader–member exchange (LMX), reflecting the relationship between a supervisor and each supervisee, using mean team LMX, dispersion of individual clinician ratings compared to team members (i.e. relative LMX) and team level variability (i.e. LMX differentiation), in relation to organizational climate and clinician TI.Design/methodology/approachSurvey data were collected from 363 clinicians, nested in children's mental health agency workgroups, providing county-contracted outpatient services to youth and families. A moderated mediation path analysis examined cross-level associations of leader–member exchange with organizational climate and turnover intentions.FindingsLower relative LMX and greater LMX differentiation were associated with higher clinician TI. Higher team-level demoralizing climate also predicted higher TI. These findings indicate that poorer LMX and more variability in LMX at the team level are related to clinician TI.Originality/valueThis study describes both team- and clinician-level factors on clinician TI. Few studies have examined LMX in mental health, and fewer still have examined relative LMX and LMX differentiation associations with organizational climate and TI. These findings highlight the importance of leader–follower relationships and organizational climate and their associations with clinician TIs. Mental health service systems and organizations can address these issues through fostering more positive supervisor–supervisee relationships.
Collapse
|
11
|
Czosnek L, Rankin N, Zopf E, Richards J, Rosenbaum S, Cormie P. Implementing Exercise in Healthcare Settings: The Potential of Implementation Science. Sports Med 2020; 50:1-14. [PMID: 31749112 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01228-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Exercise is an efficacious therapy for many chronic diseases. Integrating efficacious evidence-based interventions (EBIs), such as exercise, into daily healthcare practice is a slow and complex pursuit. Implementation science seeks to understand and address this phenomenon by conducting studies about the methods used to promote the routine uptake of EBIs. The purpose of this article is to explore implementation science and a common conceptual framework in the discipline, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), as it applies to exercise EBI. We conclude by offering recommendations for future research that leverage implementation science priorities to highlight the potential of this research field for advancing the implementation of exercise EBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Czosnek
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Level 5, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
| | - Nicole Rankin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eva Zopf
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Level 5, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Justin Richards
- Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.,School of Public Health and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Simon Rosenbaum
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Prue Cormie
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Level 5, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|