1
|
Kook M, Clinger JW, Lee E, Schneider SC, Storch EA, Guzick AG. A Content Analysis of Self-report Child Anxiety Measures. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2024; 55:873-881. [PMID: 36264411 PMCID: PMC10115911 DOI: 10.1007/s10578-022-01455-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
A clear understanding of the item content of psychological assessments is critical but often overlooked. This study describes the content overlap of seven commonly used and psychometrically validated measures of anxiety among children and adolescents. Symptom codes were created for all items across measures and items were sorted by these codes, which all fell into specific symptom categories. We conducted two analyses of all items: a "bottom-up" content categorization approach, which used symptom categories that were developed during this study, and a "top-down" DSM-5 categorization which mapped items onto symptoms of anxiety disorders in the DSM-5. Findings reveal a weak mean overlap across the included measures of youth anxiety. This suggests that the scope of anxiety measures should be carefully considered when designing studies, interpreting research, or assessing youth in clinical practice. Further research is needed to develop and establish a coding scheme for a more objective, comprehensive content analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minjee Kook
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Blvd, Suite 4-400, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jane W Clinger
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Blvd, Suite 4-400, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Eric Lee
- Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA
| | - Sophie C Schneider
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Blvd, Suite 4-400, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Eric A Storch
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Blvd, Suite 4-400, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Andrew G Guzick
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Blvd, Suite 4-400, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Jong K, Douglas S, Wolpert M, Delgadillo J, Aas B, Bovendeerd B, Carlier I, Compare A, Edbrooke-Childs J, Janse P, Lutz W, Moltu C, Nordberg S, Poulsen S, Rubel JA, Schiepek G, Schilling VNLS, van Sonsbeek M, Barkham M. Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024:10.1007/s10488-024-01381-3. [PMID: 38733413 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01381-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
We face increasing demand for greater access to effective routine mental health services, including telehealth. However, treatment outcomes in routine clinical practice are only about half the size of those reported in controlled trials. Progress feedback, defined as the ongoing monitoring of patients' treatment response with standardized measures, is an evidence-based practice that continues to be under-utilized in routine care. The aim of the current review is to provide a summary of the current evidence base for the use of progress feedback, its mechanisms of action and considerations for successful implementation. We reviewed ten available meta-analyses, which report small to medium overall effect sizes. The results suggest that adding feedback to a wide range of psychological and psychiatric interventions (ranging from primary care to hospitalization and crisis care) tends to enhance the effectiveness of these interventions. The strongest evidence is for patients with common mental health problems compared to those with very severe disorders. Effect sizes for not-on-track cases, a subgroup of cases that are not progressing well, are found to be somewhat stronger, especially when clinical support tools are added to the feedback. Systematic reviews and recent studies suggest potential mechanisms of action for progress feedback include focusing the clinician's attention, altering clinician expectations, providing new information, and enhancing patient-centered communication. Promising approaches to strengthen progress feedback interventions include advanced systems with signaling technology, clinical problem-solving tools, and a broader spectrum of outcome and progress measures. An overview of methodological and implementation challenges is provided, as well as suggestions for addressing these issues in future studies. We conclude that while feedback has modest effects, it is a small and affordable intervention that can potentially improve outcomes in psychological interventions. Further research into mechanisms of action and effective implementation strategies is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim de Jong
- Clinical Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333 AK, The Netherlands.
| | - Susan Douglas
- Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Miranda Wolpert
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Department of Clinical, Education and Health Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom, UK
| | - Jaime Delgadillo
- Clinical and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Benjamin Aas
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bram Bovendeerd
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Dimence, Center for mental health care, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Carlier
- Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Angelo Compare
- Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Julian Edbrooke-Childs
- Evidence Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Wolfgang Lutz
- Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany
| | - Christian Moltu
- District General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Førde, Norway
| | - Samuel Nordberg
- Department of Behavioral Health, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Stig Poulsen
- Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Julian A Rubel
- Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Günter Schiepek
- Institute of Synergetics and Psychotherapy Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | | | - Michael Barkham
- Clinical and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lam RW, Kennedy SH, Adams C, Bahji A, Beaulieu S, Bhat V, Blier P, Blumberger DM, Brietzke E, Chakrabarty T, Do A, Frey BN, Giacobbe P, Gratzer D, Grigoriadis S, Habert J, Ishrat Husain M, Ismail Z, McGirr A, McIntyre RS, Michalak EE, Müller DJ, Parikh SV, Quilty LS, Ravindran AV, Ravindran N, Renaud J, Rosenblat JD, Samaan Z, Saraf G, Schade K, Schaffer A, Sinyor M, Soares CN, Swainson J, Taylor VH, Tourjman SV, Uher R, van Ameringen M, Vazquez G, Vigod S, Voineskos D, Yatham LN, Milev RV. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2023 Update on Clinical Guidelines for Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults: Réseau canadien pour les traitements de l'humeur et de l'anxiété (CANMAT) 2023 : Mise à jour des lignes directrices cliniques pour la prise en charge du trouble dépressif majeur chez les adultes. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2024:7067437241245384. [PMID: 38711351 DOI: 10.1177/07067437241245384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) last published clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder (MDD) in 2016. Owing to advances in the field, an update was needed to incorporate new evidence and provide new and revised recommendations for the assessment and management of MDD in adults. METHODS CANMAT convened a guidelines editorial group comprised of academic clinicians and patient partners. A systematic literature review was conducted, focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analyses published since the 2016 guidelines. Recommendations were organized by lines of treatment, which were informed by CANMAT-defined levels of evidence and supplemented by clinical support (consisting of expert consensus on safety, tolerability, and feasibility). Drafts were revised based on review by patient partners, expert peer review, and a defined expert consensus process. RESULTS The updated guidelines comprise eight primary topics, in a question-and-answer format, that map a patient care journey from assessment to selection of evidence-based treatments, prevention of recurrence, and strategies for inadequate response. The guidelines adopt a personalized care approach that emphasizes shared decision-making that reflects the values, preferences, and treatment history of the patient with MDD. Tables provide new and updated recommendations for psychological, pharmacological, lifestyle, complementary and alternative medicine, digital health, and neuromodulation treatments. Caveats and limitations of the evidence are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS The CANMAT 2023 updated guidelines provide evidence-informed recommendations for the management of MDD, in a clinician-friendly format. These updated guidelines emphasize a collaborative, personalized, and systematic management approach that will help optimize outcomes for adults with MDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond W Lam
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sidney H Kennedy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Camelia Adams
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Anees Bahji
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Serge Beaulieu
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Venkat Bhat
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pierre Blier
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Elisa Brietzke
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Trisha Chakrabarty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - André Do
- Department of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Benicio N Frey
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Giacobbe
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Gratzer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jeffrey Habert
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Ishrat Husain
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zahinoor Ismail
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Alexander McGirr
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Roger S McIntyre
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Erin E Michalak
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Daniel J Müller
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sagar V Parikh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbour, MI, USA
| | - Lena S Quilty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arun V Ravindran
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nisha Ravindran
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Johanne Renaud
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Zainab Samaan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gayatri Saraf
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kathryn Schade
- Office of Research Services, Huron University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ayal Schaffer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Sinyor
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Claudio N Soares
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Swainson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Valerie H Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Smadar V Tourjman
- Department of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Rudolf Uher
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Michael van Ameringen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gustavo Vazquez
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Simone Vigod
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daphne Voineskos
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lakshmi N Yatham
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Roumen V Milev
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Youn SJ, Boswell JF, Douglas S, Harris BA, Aajmain S, Arnold KT, Creed TA, Gutner CA, Orengo-Aguayo R, Oswald JM, Stirman SW. Implementation Science and Practice-Oriented Research: Convergence and Complementarity. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024; 51:336-347. [PMID: 37646966 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01296-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Implementation science is the scientific study of methods to promote the uptake of research findings and other evidence-based practices in routine care, with the goal of improving the quality and effectiveness of health services (Bauer et al., 2015). In addition to this common goal, practice-oriented psychotherapy research (and researchers) and implementation science (and scientists) share a common focus on the people and the places where treatment happens. Thus, there exists strong potential for combining these two approaches. In this article, we provide a primer on implementation science for psychotherapy researchers and highlight important areas and examples of convergence and complementarity between implementation science and practice-oriented psychotherapy research. Specifically, we (a) define and describe the core features of implementation science; (b) discuss similarities and areas of complementarity between implementation science and practice-oriented psychotherapy research; (c) discuss a case example that exemplifies the integration of implementation science and practice-oriented research; and (d) propose directions for future research and collaborations that leverage both implementation science and practice-oriented research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Jeong Youn
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, Harvard Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
| | - James F Boswell
- Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Susan Douglas
- Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bethany A Harris
- Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Syed Aajmain
- Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly T Arnold
- Whole Health Equity Lab, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Torrey A Creed
- Penn Collaborative for CBT and Implementation Science, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cassidy A Gutner
- Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rosaura Orengo-Aguayo
- Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), National Crime Victims Research & Treatment Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
- Dissemination and Training Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Connors EH, Childs AW, Douglas S, Jensen-Doss A. Data-Informed Communication: How Measurement-Based Care Can Optimize Child Psychotherapy. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024:10.1007/s10488-024-01372-4. [PMID: 38662178 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01372-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Measurement-based care (MBC) research and practice, including clinical workflows and systems to support MBC, are grounded in adult-serving mental health systems. MBC research evidence is building in child and adolescent services, but MBC practice is inherently more complex due to identified client age, the family system and the need to involve multiple reporters. This paper seeks to address a gap in the literature by providing practical guidance for youth-serving clinicians implementing MBC with children and their families. We focus on MBC as a data-informed, client-centered communication process, and present three key strategies to enhance usual care child and adolescent psychotherapy via developmentally-appropriate MBC. These strategies include (1) go beyond standardized measures; (2) lean into discrepancies; and (3) get curious together. Case-based examples drawn from various child-serving settings illustrate these key strategies of MBC in child psychotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amber W Childs
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Susan Douglas
- Department of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Donelan J, Douglas S, Willson A, Lester T, Daly S. Implementing Measurement-Based Care in a Youth Partial Hospital Setting: Leveraging Feedback for Sustainability. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024:10.1007/s10488-024-01358-2. [PMID: 38575735 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01358-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
This paper describes the successful implementation of Measurement-Based Care (MBC) within a Partial Hospitalization Program (PHP) for children and adolescents. Measurement-based care (MBC), the practice of using patient-reported measures routinely to inform decision-making, is associated with improved clinical outcomes for behavioral health patients (Jong et al., Clinical Psychology Review 85, 2021; Fortney & Sladek, 2015). MBC holds great promise in partial hospital programs (PHP) to improve outcomes, yet implementation strategies are as complex as the setting itself. This paper provides a case study example of MBC implementation in a PHP for youth. Over the course of 18 months, an interdisciplinary staff of approximately 20 behavioral health professionals provided partial hospitalization level of care to 633 (39% in-person, 61% telehealth) youth from ages 5 to 18 years old. MBC in this setting incorporated daily patient self-report and weekly caregiver-reported measurements. This descriptive reconstruction, which includes examples of the data that were used during the implementation project, illustrates specific barriers and facilitators in a successful implementation in the local PHP setting. Implementation strategies to address workflow integration, leadership and supervision, and coaching are described, including evolution of these strategies over the course of implementation. Practical considerations for implementing MBC in youth PHP settings are discussed. Finally, the authors explore the potential relationships between the data-driven MBC model of decision making and the development of resilient organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Donelan
- Department of Psychiatry Baystate Health, Springfield, MA, USA.
- Mirah, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Susan Douglas
- Department of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ariane Willson
- Department of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Tyrena Lester
- Department of Psychiatry Baystate Health, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Stephanie Daly
- Department of Psychiatry Baystate Health, Springfield, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martinez RG, McNeil GD, Cornacchio D, Schneider BN, Peris TS. A Pilot Project to Integrate Individualized Measurement Into Measurement-Based Care in a Child Partial Hospitalization Program. Behav Ther 2024; 55:191-200. [PMID: 38216232 DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
Measurement-based care (MBC), or the regular use of progress measures to inform clinical decision-making, improves quality of care and clinical outcomes. MBC typically focuses on standardized rather than individualized outcome measurement. In this pilot study, we examined the clinical utility of integrating individualized measurement with existing standardized outcome monitoring in a children's partial hospitalization program. Participants were 48 youth (M age 10.13 ± 1.39; 54.2% male, 41.7% female, 4.2% transgender or nonbinary). Comorbidity was common; 83.4% of youth had more than one diagnosis at intake. Using the Youth Top Problems for individualized outcome measurement, we examined Top Problem content and clinical improvement over time. Finally, we examined completion rates and describe implementation issues. Top Problems were heterogeneous and sensitive to change. Of the 144 problems, 107 (74%) had a focus consistent with measures used in program, while 37 (26%) were not captured by standardized measures used in program. Effect sizes from admission to final measurement ranged from Cohen's d = .75 - 1.00. Initial adoption of the MBC was strong, but sustained use of the system over the treatment course was challenging. Individualized outcome measurement in children's partial hospitalization programs is feasible to administer and sensitive to clinical change that is unique from change captured in standardized measures. Parents were able to self-identify clinically meaningful, highly individualized Top Problems. Challenges of implementation and clinical assessment in acute settings and potential strategies for improving implementation are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben G Martinez
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute; UCLA Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior
| | - Galen D McNeil
- UCLA Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior
| | | | | | - Tara S Peris
- UCLA Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bassi E, Bright K, Norman L, Pintson K, Daniel S, Sidhu S, Gondziola J, Bradley J, Fersovitch M, Stamp L, Moskovic K, LaMonica H, Iorfino F, Gaskell T, Tomlinson S, Johnson D, Dimitropoulos G. Perceptions of mental health providers of the barriers and facilitators of using and engaging youth in digital mental-health-enabled measurement based care. Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076241253093. [PMID: 38726214 PMCID: PMC11080807 DOI: 10.1177/20552076241253093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Increased rates of mental health disorders and substance use among youth and young adults have increased globally, furthering the strain on an already burdened mental health system. Digital solutions have been proposed as a potential option for the provision of timely mental health services for youth, with little research exploring mental health professional views about using such innovative tools. In Alberta, Canada, we are evaluating the implementation and integration of a digital mental health (dMH) platform into existing service pathways. Within this paper we seek to explore mental health professionals' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators that may influence their utilization of digital MH-enabled measurement-based care (MBC) with the youth who access their services. Methods A qualitative, descriptive methodology was used to inductively generate themes from focus groups conducted with mental health professionals from specialized mental health services and primary care networks in Alberta. Results As mental health professionals considered the barriers and facilitators of using dMH with youth, they referenced individual and family barriers and facilitators to consider. Providers highlighted perceived barriers, including: first, cultural stigma, family apprehension about mental health care, and parental access to dMH and MBC as deterrents to providers adopting digital platforms in routine care; second, perceptions of increased responsibility and liability for youth in crisis; third, perception that some psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders in youth are not amenable to dMH; fourth, professionals contemplated youth readiness to engage with dMH-enabled MBC. Participants also highlighted pertinent facilitators to dMH use, noting: first, the suitability of dMH for youth with mild mental health concerns; second, youth motivated to report their changes in mental health symptoms; and lastly, youth proficiency and preference for dMH options. Conclusions By identifying professionals' perceptions of barriers and facilitators for youth users, we may better understand how to address misconceptions about who is eligible and appropriate for dMH through training and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E.M. Bassi
- Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - K.S. Bright
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Community, and Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Heroes in Mind, Advocacy, and Research Consortium (HiMARC), Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Health Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Provincial Addiction and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - L.G. Norman
- Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - K. Pintson
- Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - S. Daniel
- Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - S. Sidhu
- Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - J. Gondziola
- Provincial Addiction and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - J. Bradley
- Provincial Addiction and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - M. Fersovitch
- Provincial Addiction and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - L. Stamp
- Provincial Addiction and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - K. Moskovic
- Provincial Addiction and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - H.M. LaMonica
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - F. Iorfino
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - T. Gaskell
- Provincial Addiction and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - S. Tomlinson
- Provincial Addiction and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - D.W. Johnson
- Departments of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Physiology and Pharmacology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Maternal Newborn Child and Youth Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - G. Dimitropoulos
- Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Calgary Eating Disorders Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Douglas S, Bovendeerd B, van Sonsbeek M, Manns M, Milling XP, Tyler K, Bala N, Satterthwaite T, Hovland RT, Amble I, Atzil-Slonim D, Barkham M, de Jong K, Kendrick T, Nordberg SS, Lutz W, Rubel JA, Skjulsvik T, Moltu C. A Clinical Leadership Lens on Implementing Progress Feedback in Three Countries: Development of a Multidimensional Qualitative Coding Scheme. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2023:10.1007/s10488-023-01314-6. [PMID: 37917313 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01314-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Progress feedback, also known as measurement-based care (MBC), is the routine collection of patient-reported measures to monitor treatment progress and inform clinical decision-making. Although a key ingredient to improving mental health care, sustained use of progress feedback is poor. Integration into everyday workflow is challenging, impacted by a complex interrelated set of factors across patient, clinician, organizational, and health system levels. This study describes the development of a qualitative coding scheme for progress feedback implementation that accounts for the dynamic nature of barriers and facilitators across multiple levels of use in mental health settings. Such a coding scheme may help promote a common language for researchers and implementers to better identify barriers that need to be addressed, as well as facilitators that could be supported in different settings and contexts. METHODS Clinical staff, managers, and leaders from two Dutch, three Norwegian, and four mental health organizations in the USA participated in semi-structured interviews on how intra- and extra-organizational characteristics interact to influence the use of progress feedback in clinical practice, supervision, and program improvement. Interviews were conducted in the local language, then translated to English prior to qualitative coding. RESULTS A team-based consensus coding approach was used to refine an a priori expert-informed and literature-based qualitative scheme to incorporate new understandings and constructs as they emerged. First, this hermeneutic approach resulted in a multi-level coding scheme with nine superordinate categories and 30 subcategories. Second-order axial coding established contextually sensitive categories for barriers and facilitators. CONCLUSIONS The primary outcome is an empirically derived multi-level qualitative coding scheme that can be used in progress feedback implementation research and development. It can be applied across contexts and settings, with expectations for ongoing refinement. Suggestions for future research and application in practice settings are provided. Supplementary materials include the coding scheme and a detailed playbook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Douglas
- Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, 230 Appleton Place PMB #414, Nashville, TN, 37203-5721, USA.
| | - Bram Bovendeerd
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Dimence, Center for Mental Health Care, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mya Manns
- Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, 230 Appleton Place PMB #414, Nashville, TN, 37203-5721, USA
| | - Xavier Patrick Milling
- Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, 230 Appleton Place PMB #414, Nashville, TN, 37203-5721, USA
| | - Ke'Sean Tyler
- Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, 230 Appleton Place PMB #414, Nashville, TN, 37203-5721, USA
| | | | - Tim Satterthwaite
- Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, 230 Appleton Place PMB #414, Nashville, TN, 37203-5721, USA
| | - Runar Tengel Hovland
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Førde, Norway
- Department of Research and Innovation, Førde Hospital Trust, Førde, Norway
| | - Ingunn Amble
- Villa Sana - Centre for Work Health, Modum Bad, Norway
| | | | - Michael Barkham
- Clinical and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kim de Jong
- Clinical Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Samuel S Nordberg
- Department of Behavioral Health, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Wolfgang Lutz
- Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany
| | - Julian A Rubel
- Department of Psychology, Psychotherapy Research Lab, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | | | - Christian Moltu
- District General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Førde, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thomas SA, Browning CJ, Charchar FJ, Klein B, Ory MG, Bowden-Jones H, Chamberlain SR. Transforming global approaches to chronic disease prevention and management across the lifespan: integrating genomics, behavior change, and digital health solutions. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1248254. [PMID: 37905238 PMCID: PMC10613497 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1248254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic illnesses are a major threat to global population health through the lifespan into older age. Despite world-wide public health goals, there has been a steady increase in chronic and non-communicable diseases (e.g., cancer, cardiovascular and metabolic disorders) and strong growth in mental health disorders. In 2010, 67% of deaths worldwide were due to chronic diseases and this increased to 74% in 2019, with accelerated growth in the COVID-19 era and its aftermath. Aging and wellbeing across the lifespan are positively impacted by the presence of effective prevention and management of chronic illness that can enhance population health. This paper provides a short overview of the journey to this current situation followed by discussion of how we may better address what the World Health Organization has termed the "tsunami of chronic diseases." In this paper we advocate for the development, validation, and subsequent deployment of integrated: 1. Polygenic and multifactorial risk prediction tools to screen for those at future risk of chronic disease and those with undiagnosed chronic disease. 2. Advanced preventive, behavior change and chronic disease management to maximize population health and wellbeing. 3. Digital health systems to support greater efficiencies in population-scale health prevention and intervention programs. It is argued that each of these actions individually has an emerging evidence base. However, there has been limited research to date concerning the combined population-level health effects of their integration. We outline the conceptual framework within which we are planning and currently conducting studies to investigate the effects of their integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane A Thomas
- Vice Chancellor’s Office, Federation University, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Colette J Browning
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
- Health Innovation and Transformation Centre (HITC), Federation University, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Fadi J Charchar
- Health Innovation and Transformation Centre (HITC), Federation University, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Britt Klein
- Health Innovation and Transformation Centre (HITC), Federation University, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Marcia G. Ory
- Center for Community Health and Aging, Texas A&M University, School of Public Health, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Henrietta Bowden-Jones
- National Problem Gambling Clinic, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel R. Chamberlain
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Southern Gambling Service, and Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ko H, Gatto AJ, Jones SB, O'Brien VC, McNamara RS, Tenzer MM, Sharp HD, Kablinger AS, Cooper LD. Improving measurement-based care implementation in adult ambulatory psychiatry: a virtual focus group interview with multidisciplinary healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:408. [PMID: 37101134 PMCID: PMC10132409 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09202-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurement-Based Care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice shown to enhance patient care. Despite being efficacious, MBC is not commonly used in practice. While barriers and facilitators of MBC implementation have been described in the literature, the type of clinicians and populations studied vary widely, even within the same practice setting. The current study aims to improve MBC implementation in adult ambulatory psychiatry by conducting focus group interviews while utilizing a novel virtual brainwriting premortem method. METHODS Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with clinicians (n = 18) and staff (n = 7) to identify their current attitudes, facilitators, and barriers of MBC implementation in their healthcare setting. Virtual video-conferencing software was used to conduct focus groups, and based on transcribed verbatin, emergent barriers/facilitators and four themes were identified. Mixed methods approach was utilized for this study. Specifically, qualitative data was aggregated and re-coded separately by three doctoral-level coders. Quantitative analyses were conducted from a follow-up questionnaire surveying clinician attitudes and satisfaction with MBC. RESULTS The clinician and staff focus groups resulted in 291 and 91 unique codes, respectively. While clinicians identified a similar number of barriers (40.9%) and facilitators (44.3%), staff identified more barriers (67%) than facilitators (24.7%) for MBC. Four themes emerged from the analysis; (1) a description of current status/neutral opinion on MBC; (2) positive themes that include benefits of MBC, facilitators, enablers, or reasons on why they conduct MBC in their practice, (3) negative themes that include barriers or issues that hinder them from incorporating MBC into their practice, and (4) requests and suggestions for future MBC implementation. Both participant groups raised more negative themes highlighting critical challenges to MBC implementation than positive themes. The follow-up questionnaire regarding MBC attitudes showed the areas that clinicians emphasized the most and the least in their clinical practice. CONCLUSION The virtual brainwriting premortem focus groups provided critical information on the shortcomings and strengths of MBC in adult ambulatory psychiatry. Our findings underscore implementation challenges in healthcare settings and provide insight for both research and clinical practice in mental health fields. The barriers and facilitators identified in this study can inform future training to increase sustainability and better integrate MBC with positive downstream outcomes in patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayoung Ko
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
| | - Alyssa J Gatto
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Sydney B Jones
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Virginia C O'Brien
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Robert S McNamara
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Martha M Tenzer
- Health Analytics Research Team, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Hunter D Sharp
- Health Analytics Research Team, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Anita S Kablinger
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Lee D Cooper
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Sonsbeek MAMS, Hutschemaekers GJM, Veerman JW, Vermulst A, Tiemens BG. The results of clinician-focused implementation strategies on uptake and outcomes of Measurement-Based Care (MBC) in general mental health care. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:326. [PMID: 37005612 PMCID: PMC10067297 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09343-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurement-Based Care (MBC) is the routine administration of measures, clinicians' review of the feedback and discussion of the feedback with their clients, and collaborative evaluation of the treatment plan. Although MBC is a promising way to improve outcomes in clinical practice, the implementation of MBC faces many barriers, and its uptake by clinicians is low. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether implementation strategies that were developed with clinicians and aimed at clinicians had an effect on (a) clinicians' uptake of MBC and (b) clients' outcomes of MBC. METHODS We used an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design based on Grol and Wensing's implementation framework to assess the impact of clinician-focused implementation strategies on both clinicians' uptake of MBC and outcomes obtained with MBC for clients in general mental health care. We hereby focused on the first and second parts of MBC, i.e., the administration of measures and use of feedback. Primary outcome measures were questionnaire completion rate and discussion of the feedback with clients. Secondary outcomes were treatment outcome, treatment length, and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS There was a significant effect of the MBC implementation strategies on questionnaire completion rate (one part of clinicians' uptake), but no significant effect on the amount of discussion of the feedback (the other part of clinicians' uptake). Neither was there a significant effect on clients' outcomes (treatment outcome, treatment length, and satisfaction with treatment). Due to various study limitations, the results should be viewed as exploratory. CONCLUSIONS Establishing and sustaining MBC in real-world general mental health care is complex. This study helps to disentangle the effects of MBC implementation strategies on differential clinician uptake, but the effects of MBC implementation strategies on client outcomes need further examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giel J M Hutschemaekers
- Pro Persona Research, Pro Persona, Postbus 27, 6870 AA, Renkum, The Netherlands
- Indigo Gelderland, Indigo Service Organisatie BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan W Veerman
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ad Vermulst
- GGZ (Mental Health Care) Oost Brabant, Boekel, The Netherlands
| | - Bea G Tiemens
- Pro Persona Research, Pro Persona, Postbus 27, 6870 AA, Renkum, The Netherlands
- Indigo Gelderland, Indigo Service Organisatie BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reay S, Reay W, Tevis K, Patterson L. Do Degrees Matter? Rethinking Workforce Development for Youth with Intellectual Disabilities and Mental Health Challenges. GLOBAL IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS 2023; 3:67-77. [PMID: 37006595 PMCID: PMC10034226 DOI: 10.1007/s43477-023-00076-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
The global workforce crisis significantly impacts how evidence-based treatment is provided to youth with developmental disabilities and co-occurring mental health conditions. Addressing the workforce crisis requires re-examining the long-standing methods of selecting individuals for employment based on academic degrees. This project offers an innovative workforce development option that provides specialized training to staff with advanced education degrees and staff with less education. The participants in this study were employed in a rural area of the USA within the mental health, child welfare, and correctional industries. All participants worked with youth experiencing intellectual disabilities and mental illness. Results indicated that participants improved their knowledge of the population, demonstrated a better understanding of EBPs, and were willing to employ evidence-based approaches regardless of their education or age. Although overall attitudes toward EBPs decreased, diverging attitudes increased, suggesting a need to accommodate treatment strategies when EBP models are unavailable for special populations. Initial knowledge gaps demonstrated by those with a master's degree and those with less education disappeared after the training. This finding supports the application of innovative task-shifting options in mental health, such as diverting more sophisticated care tasks to nonprofessionally trained persons, which can reduce workforce pressure and unmet demand for care. This study demonstrates cost-effective and time-efficient methods of training staff regardless of education by relying less on specific EBP models and more on adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Reay
- Grace Abbott School of Social Work, University of Nebraska Omaha, 6001 Dodge St., CPACS 205, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Keepers BC, Easterly CW, Nora Dennis, Domino ME, Bhalla IP. A Survey of Behavioral Health Care Providers on Use and Barriers to Use of Measurement-Based Care. Psychiatr Serv 2023; 74:349-357. [PMID: 36695012 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite robust evidence for efficacy of measurement-based care (MBC) in behavioral health care, studies suggest that adoption of MBC is limited in practice. A survey from Blue Cross-Blue Shield of North Carolina was sent to behavioral health care providers (BHCPs) about their use of MBC, beliefs about MBC, and perceived barriers to its adoption. METHODS The authors distributed the survey by using professional networks and snowball sampling. Provider and clinical practice characteristics were collected. Numerical indices of barriers to MBC use were created. Ordered logistic regression models were used to identify associations among practice and provider characteristics, barriers to MBC use, and level of MBC use. RESULTS Of the 922 eligible BHCPs who completed the survey, 426 (46%) reported using MBC with at least half of their patients. Providers were more likely to report MBC use if they were part of a large group practice, had MBC training, had more weekly care hours, or practiced in nonmetropolitan settings. Physicians, self-reported generalists, more experienced providers, and those who did not accept insurance were less likely to report MBC use. Low perceived clinical utility was the barrier most strongly associated with less frequent use of MBC. CONCLUSIONS Although evidence exists for efficacy of MBC in behavioral health care, less than half of BHCPs reported using MBC with at least half of their patients, and low perceived clinical utility of MBC was strongly associated with lower MBC use. Implementation strategies that attempt to change negative attitudes toward MBC may effectively target this barrier to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Breanna C Keepers
- Department of Psychiatry, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City (Keepers); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (Easterly); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill (Easterly); Blue Cross-Blue Shield of North Carolina, Durham (Dennis, Bhalla); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dennis); College of Health Solutions and Center for Health Information and Research, Arizona State University, Tempe (Domino)
| | - Caleb W Easterly
- Department of Psychiatry, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City (Keepers); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (Easterly); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill (Easterly); Blue Cross-Blue Shield of North Carolina, Durham (Dennis, Bhalla); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dennis); College of Health Solutions and Center for Health Information and Research, Arizona State University, Tempe (Domino)
| | - Nora Dennis
- Department of Psychiatry, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City (Keepers); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (Easterly); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill (Easterly); Blue Cross-Blue Shield of North Carolina, Durham (Dennis, Bhalla); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dennis); College of Health Solutions and Center for Health Information and Research, Arizona State University, Tempe (Domino)
| | - Marisa Elena Domino
- Department of Psychiatry, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City (Keepers); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (Easterly); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill (Easterly); Blue Cross-Blue Shield of North Carolina, Durham (Dennis, Bhalla); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dennis); College of Health Solutions and Center for Health Information and Research, Arizona State University, Tempe (Domino)
| | - Ish P Bhalla
- Department of Psychiatry, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City (Keepers); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (Easterly); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill (Easterly); Blue Cross-Blue Shield of North Carolina, Durham (Dennis, Bhalla); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dennis); College of Health Solutions and Center for Health Information and Research, Arizona State University, Tempe (Domino)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roest JJ, Welmers-Van de Poll MJ, Van der Helm GHP, Stams GJJM, Hoeve M. A Meta-Analysis on Differences and Associations between Alliance Ratings in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL FOR THE SOCIETY OF CLINICAL CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, DIVISION 53 2023; 52:55-73. [PMID: 35862768 DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2093210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The alliance in child and adolescent psychotherapy is widely recognized as an important factor in therapy. Studies on the alliance have increasingly focused on assessment of the alliance as a dyadic construct, measuring both client and therapist alliance ratings. However, cross-informant reports of the alliance in child psychotherapy have not yet been subjected to meta-analysis. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aims to increase knowledge on the degree of convergence and divergence between child, parent, therapist, and observer alliance ratings in child and adolescent psychotherapy. METHODS A series of three-level meta-analyses of 78 studies was conducted to investigate differences and associations between child, parent, therapist, and observer alliance ratings in child and adolescent psychotherapy. RESULTS Findings indicated that children and parents in general rated the alliance more positively than their therapists (d = 0.35, d = 0.72, respectively), and that child-therapist and parent-therapist alliance ratings were moderately correlated (r = .32, r = .23, respectively). Associations between child and therapist ratings and observer ratings were moderate to large (r = .43, r = .53, respectively). CONCLUSIONS It can be concluded that children and parents generally report more positively on the alliance compared to their therapists, which is consistent with research on the alliance in adult populations. The small to moderate associations between alliance ratings indicate that individuals to some extent have a shared perspective on their alliance, and that the various perspectives on alliance should be acknowledged when dealing with children and parents in therapy. Implications for future research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse J Roest
- Department of Social Work and Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences Leiden
| | | | - G H Peer Van der Helm
- Department of Social Work and Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences Leiden.,Research Institute Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam
| | | | - Machteld Hoeve
- Research Institute Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Van Tiem J, Wirtz E, Suiter N, Heeren A, Fuhrmeister L, Fortney J, Reisinger H, Turvey C. The Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in the Context of Telemedicine: Qualitative Study. JMIR Ment Health 2022; 9:e41601. [PMID: 36422884 PMCID: PMC9732750 DOI: 10.2196/41601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Measurement Based Care in Mental Health Initiative launched by the Department of Veterans Affairs in 2016 is an example of an evidence-based practice that uses patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to improve patient outcomes. The acceptance of measurement-based care (MBC) among Veterans Affairs providers is relatively high. However, there are barriers to MBC for telehealth providers. Health information technologies might afford opportunities to address some of the barriers related to the uptake of MBC. OBJECTIVE This paper reports on an implementation effort to integrate MBC into mental health care telehealth practice using eHealth solutions. METHODS Qualitative data were generated from 22 semistructured interviews with psychiatrists (n=4), psychologists (n=3), social workers (n=3), nurses (n=6), a pharmacist (n=1), and administrative staff (n=5) who provide telemental health care through a community-based outpatient clinic in the rural Midwestern United States. The interviews were conducted during the pilot phase of an implementation initiative to increase the adoption of MBC by revising clinic workflows to integrate the use of eHealth technologies. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Time burden and workflow issues were the most common barrier to provider adoption of MBC; sharing and reviewing pencil-and-paper measures and results in the same room was no longer possible in novel telehealth workflows necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Providers voiced concerns about how long it would take to collect, adequately score, interpret, share, and document the PROMs during the telehealth visit. Concerns about time might also correspond to a gap in providers' familiarity with these assessments, greater comfort in assessing symptoms through clinical interviews, and being accustomed to using the assessments as screening tools more so than longitudinal outcome measures. Capacities associated with eHealth technologies may address workflow concerns and promote providers' understanding and use of the measures as tracking tools. CONCLUSIONS The need to use limited appointment time well was a top priority for telemental health providers. eHealth technologies provided operative supports that protect time in appointments by shifting when and how PROMs are collected. Bolstering providers' familiarity with how to use PROMs in the course of treatment may impact providers' buy-in by encouraging them to reconsider how sharing and acting on PROMs could be time well spent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jen Van Tiem
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development, Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, United States.,Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Iowa City, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Elizabeth Wirtz
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development, Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, United States.,Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Iowa City, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Natalie Suiter
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development, Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, United States.,Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Iowa City, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Amanda Heeren
- Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Iowa City, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Lindsey Fuhrmeister
- Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Iowa City, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - John Fortney
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Values-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Heather Reisinger
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development, Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, United States.,Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Carolyn Turvey
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development, Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, United States.,Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Iowa City, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sichel CE, Connors EH. Measurement feedback system implementation in public youth mental health treatment services: a mixed methods analysis. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:119. [PMID: 36415009 PMCID: PMC9682849 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00356-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies indicate the effectiveness of measurement-based care (MBC), an evidence-based practice, in improving and accelerating positive outcomes for youth receiving behavioral health services. MBC is the routine collection and use of client-reported progress measures to inform shared decision-making and collaborative treatment adjustments and is a relatively feasible and scalable clinical practice, particularly well-suited for under-resourced community mental health settings. However, uptake of MBC remains low, so information on determinants related to MBC practice patterns is needed. METHODS Quantitative and qualitative data from N = 80 clinicians who implemented MBC using a measurement feedback system (MFS) were merged to understand and describe determinants of practice over three study phases. Quantitative, latent class analysis identified clinician groups based on participants' ratings of MFS acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility and describes similarities/differences between classes in clinician-level characteristics (e.g., age; perceptions of implementation climate; reported MFS use; phase I). Qualitative analyses of clinicians' responses to open-ended questions about their MFS use and feedback about the MFS and implementation supports were conducted separately to understand multi-level barriers and facilitators to MFS implementation (phase II). Mixing occurred during interpretation, examining clinician experiences and opinions across groups to understand the needs of different classes of clinicians, describe class differences, and inform selection of implementation strategies in future research (phase III). RESULTS We identified two classes of clinicians: "Higher MFS" and "Lower MFS," and found similarities and differences in MFS use across groups. Compared to Lower MFS participants, clinicians in the Higher MFS group reported facilitators at a higher rate. Four determinants of practice were associated with the uptake of MBC and MFS in youth-serving community mental health settings for all clinicians: clarity, appropriateness, and feasibility of the MFS and its measures; clinician knowledge and skills; client preferences and behaviors; and incentives and resources (e.g., time; continuing educational support). Findings also highlighted the need for individual-level implementation strategies to target clinician needs, skills, and perceptions for future MBC and MFS implementation efforts. CONCLUSION This study has implications for the adoption of evidence-based practices, such as MBC, in the context of community-based mental health services for youth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corianna E Sichel
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Mail Unit 78, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Elizabeth H Connors
- Division of Prevention and Community Research, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 389 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Williams NJ, Ramirez NV, Esp S, Watts A, Marcus SC. Organization-level variation in therapists' attitudes toward and use of measurement-based care. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2022; 49:927-942. [PMID: 35851928 PMCID: PMC9617767 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-022-01206-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite significant interest in improving behavioral health therapists' implementation of measurement-based care (MBC)-and widespread acknowledgment of the potential importance of organization-level determinants-little is known about the extent to which therapists' use of, and attitudes toward, MBC vary across and within provider organizations or the multilevel factors that predict this variation. METHODS Data were collected from 177 therapists delivering psychotherapy to youth in 21 specialty outpatient clinics in the USA. Primary outcomes were use of MBC for progress monitoring and treatment modification, measured by the nationally-normed Current Assessment of Practice Evaluation-Revised. Secondary outcomes were therapist attitudes towards MBC. Linear multilevel regression models tested the association of theory-informed clinic and therapist characteristics with these outcomes. RESULTS Use of MBC varied significantly across clinics, with means on progress monitoring ranging from values at the 25th to 93rd percentiles and means on treatment modification ranging from the 18th to 71st percentiles. At the clinic level, the most robust predictor of both outcomes was clinic climate for evidence-based practice implementation; at the therapist level, the most robust predictors were: attitudes regarding practicality, exposure to MBC in graduate training, and prior experience with MBC. Attitudes were most consistently related to clinic climate for evidence-based practice implementation, exposure to MBC in graduate training, and prior experience with MBC. CONCLUSIONS There is important variation in therapists' attitudes toward and use of MBC across clinics. Implementation strategies that target clinic climate for evidence-based practice implementation, graduate training, and practicality may enhance MBC implementation in behavioral health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel J Williams
- School of Social Work, Boise State University, 1910 W. University Dr, 83725, Boise, ID, USA.
- Institute for the Study of Behavioral Health and Addiction, Boise State University, 1910 W. University Dr., 83725, Boise, ID, USA.
| | - Nallely V Ramirez
- Institute for the Study of Behavioral Health and Addiction, Boise State University, 1910 W. University Dr., 83725, Boise, ID, USA
| | - Susan Esp
- School of Social Work, Boise State University, 1910 W. University Dr, 83725, Boise, ID, USA.
| | - April Watts
- Institute for the Study of Behavioral Health and Addiction, Boise State University, 1910 W. University Dr., 83725, Boise, ID, USA
| | - Steven C Marcus
- School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lewis CC, Marti CN, Scott K, Walker MR, Boyd M, Puspitasari A, Mendel P, Kroenke K. Standardized Versus Tailored Implementation of Measurement-Based Care for Depression in Community Mental Health Clinics. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:1094-1101. [PMID: 35538748 PMCID: PMC9529853 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective Measurement-based care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice that is rarely integrated into psychotherapy. The authors sought to determine whether tailored MBC implementation can improve clinician fidelity and depression outcomes compared with standardized implementation. Methods This cluster-randomized trial enrolled 12 community behavioral health clinics to receive 5 months of implementation support. Clinics randomized to the standardized implementation received electronic health record data captured with the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a needs assessment, clinical training, guidelines, and group consultation in MBC fidelity. Tailored implementation support included these strategies, but the training content was tailored to clinics’ barriers to MBC, and group consultation centered on overcoming these barriers. Clinicians (N=83, tailored; N=71, standardized) delivering individual psychotherapy to 4,025 adults participated. Adult patients (N=87, tailored; N=141, standardized) contributed data for depression outcome analyses. Results The odds of PHQ-9 completion were lower in the tailored group at baseline (odds ratio [OR]=0.28, 95% CI=0.08–0.96) but greater at 5 months (OR=3.39, 95% CI=1.00–11.48). The two implementation groups did not differ in full MBC fidelity. PHQ-9 scores decreased significantly from baseline (mean±SD=17.6±4.4) to 12 weeks (mean=12.6±5.9) (p<0.001), but neither implementation group nor MBC fidelity significantly predicted PHQ-9 scores at week 12. Conclusions Tailored MBC implementation outperformed standardized implementation with respect to PHQ-9 completion, but discussion of PHQ-9 scores in clinician-patient sessions remained suboptimal. MBC fidelity did not predict week-12 depression severity. MBC can critically inform collaborative adjustments to session or treatment plans, but more strategic system-level implementation support or longer implementation periods may be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara C Lewis
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke)
| | - C Nathan Marti
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke)
| | - Kelli Scott
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke)
| | - Madison R Walker
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke)
| | - Meredith Boyd
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke)
| | - Ajeng Puspitasari
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke)
| | - Peter Mendel
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke)
| | - Kurt Kroenke
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle (Lewis); Abacist Analytics, Austin, Texas (Marti); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Scott); School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Walker); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Boyd); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Puspitasari); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Mendel); Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington (Kroenke)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lyon AR, Liu FF, Connors EH, King KM, Coifman JI, Cook H, McRee E, Ludwig K, Law A, Dorsey S, McCauley E. How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:79. [PMID: 35869500 PMCID: PMC9306246 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00325-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Initial training and ongoing post-training consultation (i.e., ongoing support following training, provided by an expert) are among the most common implementation strategies used to change clinician practice. However, extant research has not experimentally investigated the optimal dosages of consultation necessary to produce desired outcomes. Moreover, the degree to which training and consultation engage theoretical implementation mechanisms-such as provider knowledge, skills, and attitudes-is not well understood. This study examined the effects of a brief online training and varying dosages of post-training consultation (BOLT+PTC) on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care (MBC) practices delivered in the context of education sector mental health services. METHODS A national sample of 75 clinicians who provide mental health interventions to children and adolescents in schools were randomly assigned to BOLT+PTC or control (services as usual). Those in BOLT+PTC were further randomized to 2-, 4-, or 8-week consultation conditions. Self-reported MBC knowledge, skills, attitudes, and use (including standardized assessment, individualized assessment, and assessment-informed treatment modification) were collected for 32 weeks. Multilevel models were used to examine main effects of BOLT+PTC versus control on MBC use at the end of consultation and over time, as well as comparisons among PTC dosage conditions and theorized mechanisms (skills, attitudes, knowledge). RESULTS There was a significant linear effect of BOLT+PTC over time on standardized assessment use (b = .02, p < .01), and a significant quadratic effect of BOLT+PTC over time on individualized assessment use (b = .04, p < .001), but no significant effect on treatment modification. BOLT + any level of PTC resulted in higher MBC knowledge and larger growth in MBC skill over the intervention period as compared to control. PTC dosage levels were inconsistently predictive of outcomes, providing no clear evidence for added benefit of higher PTC dosage. CONCLUSIONS Online training and consultation in MBC had effects on standardized and individualized assessment use among clinicians as compared to services as usual with no consistent benefit detected for increased consultation dosage. Continued research investigating optimal dosages and mechanisms of these established implementation strategies is needed to ensure training and consultation resources are deployed efficiently to impact clinician practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05041517 . Retrospectively registered on 10 September 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron R. Lyon
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Freda F. Liu
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Elizabeth H. Connors
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, 389 Whitney Avenue, Office 106, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
| | - Kevin M. King
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Jessica I. Coifman
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Heather Cook
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Erin McRee
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Kristy Ludwig
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Amy Law
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Graduate Medical Education, University of Washington, Learning Gateway, Box 358220, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
| | - Shannon Dorsey
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Elizabeth McCauley
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
McLeod BD, Jensen-Doss A, Lyon AR, Douglas S, Beidas RS. To Utility and Beyond! Specifying and Advancing the Utility of Measurement-Based Care for Youth. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL FOR THE SOCIETY OF CLINICAL CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, DIVISION 53 2022; 51:375-388. [PMID: 35263198 PMCID: PMC9246828 DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2042698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Mental health organizations that serve youth are under pressure to adopt measurement-based care (MBC), defined as the continuous collection of client-report data used to support clinical decision-making as part of standard care. However, few frameworks exist to help leadership ascertain how to select an MBC approach for a clinical setting. This paper seeks to define how an MBC approach can display clinical utility to provide such a framework. Broadly, we define clinical utility as evidence that an MBC approach assists stakeholders in fulfilling clinical goals related to care quality (i.e., improve client-clinician alliance and clinical outcomes) at the client (i.e., youth and caregiver), clinician, supervisor, and administrator levels. More specifically, our definition of clinical utility is divided into two categories relevant to the usability and usefulness of an MBC approach for a specific setting: (a) implementability (i.e., evidence indicating ease of use in a clinical setting) and (b) usefulness in aiding clinical activities (i.e., evidence indicating the potential to improve communication and make clinical activities related to care quality easier or more effective). These categories provide valuable information about how easy an MBC approach is to use and the potential benefits that the MBC data will confer. To detail how we arrived at this definition, we review prior definitions of clinical utility, discuss how previous definitions inform our definition of clinical utility for MBC, and provide examples of how the concept of clinical utility can be applied to MBC. We finish with a discussion of future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryce D McLeod
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University
| | | | - Aaron R Lyon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington
| | - Susan Douglas
- Department of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations, Vanderbilt University
| | - Rinad S Beidas
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, & Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Connors EH, Arora PG, Resnick SG, McKay M. A modified measurement-based care approach to improve mental health treatment engagement among racial and ethnic minoritized youth. Psychol Serv 2022; 20:2022-28569-001. [PMID: 35130008 PMCID: PMC9357230 DOI: 10.1037/ser0000617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Despite high levels of need, racial and ethnic minoritized (REM) youth are much less likely than their White peers to engage in mental health treatment. Concerns about treatment relevance and acceptability and poor therapeutic alliance have been shown to impact treatment engagement, particularly retention, among REM youth and families. Measurement-based care (MBC) is a client-centered practice of collecting and using client-reported progress data throughout treatment to inform shared decision-making. MBC has been associated with increased client involvement in treatment, improved client-provider communication, and increased satisfaction with treatment services. Despite its promise as a treatment engagement strategy, MBC has not been studied in this capacity with REM youth or systematically modified to address the needs of culturally-diverse populations. In this article, we propose a culturally-modified version of MBC, Strategic Treatment Assessment with Youth (STAY), to improve treatment engagement among REM youth and families. Specifically, STAY is designed to target perceptual barriers to treatment to improve treatment retention and ultimately, client outcomes. The four STAY components (i.e., Introduce, Collect, Share, and Act) are based on an existing MBC practice framework and modified to address perceptual barriers to treatment among REM youth. The clinical application of this model is presented via a case example. Finally, future research directions to explore the use of MBC as a treatment retention strategy with REM client populations are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
23
|
Kellogg KC, Sadeh-Sharvit S. Pragmatic AI-augmentation in mental healthcare: Key technologies, potential benefits, and real-world challenges and solutions for frontline clinicians. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:990370. [PMID: 36147984 PMCID: PMC9485594 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.990370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into mental health holds the promise of increasing patient access, engagement, and quality of care, and of improving clinician quality of work life. However, to date, studies of AI technologies in mental health have focused primarily on challenges that policymakers, clinical leaders, and data and computer scientists face, rather than on challenges that frontline mental health clinicians are likely to face as they attempt to integrate AI-based technologies into their everyday clinical practice. In this Perspective, we describe a framework for "pragmatic AI-augmentation" that addresses these issues by describing three categories of emerging AI-based mental health technologies which frontline clinicians can leverage in their clinical practice-automation, engagement, and clinical decision support technologies. We elaborate the potential benefits offered by these technologies, the likely day-to-day challenges they may raise for mental health clinicians, and some solutions that clinical leaders and technology developers can use to address these challenges, based on emerging experience with the integration of AI technologies into clinician daily practice in other healthcare disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C Kellogg
- Department of Work and Organization Studies, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Shiri Sadeh-Sharvit
- Eleos Health, Cambridge, MA, United States.,Center for M2Health, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schoenwald SK, Bradshaw CP, Hoagwood KE, Atkins MS, Ialongo N, Douglas SR. Festschrift for Leonard Bickman: Introduction to The Future of Children's Mental Health Services Special Issue. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021; 47:649-654. [PMID: 32715428 PMCID: PMC7382702 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-020-01070-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This introductory article describes the genesis of the Festschrift for Leonard Bickman and of this Festschrift special issue entitled, The Future of Children’s Mental Health Services. The special issue includes a collection of 11 original children’s mental health services research articles, broadly organized in accordance with three themes (i.e., Improving Precision and Use of Service Data to Guide Policy and Practice, Implementation and Dissemination, and Preparing for Innovation), followed by an interview-style article with Bickman. Then follows a featured manuscript by Bickman himself, three invited commentaries, and a compilation of letters and notes in which colleagues reflect on his career and on their experiences of him. The introduction concludes with a few thoughts about the future of children’s mental health services portended by the extraordinary scholarly contributions of Bickman and those who have been inspired by him.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja K Schoenwald
- Oregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphy Blvd., Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bear HA, Dalzell K, Edbrooke-Childs J, Wolpert M. Applying behaviour change theory to understand the barriers to implementing routine outcome monitoring. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY 2021; 61:557-578. [PMID: 34319602 DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) is a valuable tool for monitoring client progress and pre-empting deterioration, however, there is considerable variation in how data are collected and recorded and uptake in clinical practice remains low. The aim of this study was to develop a self-report measure of practitioner attitudes to ROM in order to better understand the barriers to successful implementation in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). METHODS An anonymous survey was completed by 184 CAMHS practitioners in the United Kingdom. The survey was designed using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B). Practitioners who reported using ROM frequently in their clinical work (53%) were compared to those who used ROM infrequently (47%) across dimensions of the COM-B survey subscales. RESULTS Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the proposed four-factor structure, showing acceptable model fit, with high factor loadings and good reliability for all subscales. Frequent users of ROM exhibited significantly higher psychological capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity, and motivation, compared to infrequent users F (4, 140) = 14.76, p < .0001; Pillai's Trace = .297, partial η2 = .30. Results highlight several barriers to ROM, including the belief that there is not a strong evidence base for ROM, not receiving external training, and not discussing feedback and outcome data in supervision. IMPLICATIONS In the hope of improving the successful implementation of ROM, this research provides an evidence-based tool for assessing practitioners' attitudes to ROM, which map on to intervention functions and represent targets for future implementation efforts. PRACTITIONER POINTS The value of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) as a means to measure client progress and to elevate the efficiency and quality of mental health care is well-documented in the research literature, however, uptake in practice remains relatively low. This study applied behaviour change theory to develop a psychometrically sound self-report measure of practitioners' perspectives and practices to understand the barriers to implementation in child and adolescent mental health services in the United Kingdom. The complex and multifaceted nature of the barriers to implementation requires multilevel behaviour change strategies at the client, clinician, and organisational level. Recommendations for practice include the need for integrated, multilevel strategies aimed at improving practitioners' capabilities and motivations, strong organisational leadership and a culture of data gathering and sharing, and implementation interventions, which are tailored to target local barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Alice Bear
- Research Department for Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.,Evidence-Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, The Kantor Centre of Excellence, London, UK.,Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Kate Dalzell
- Child Outcomes Research Consortium, The Kantor Centre of Excellence, London, UK
| | - Julian Edbrooke-Childs
- Research Department for Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.,Evidence-Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, The Kantor Centre of Excellence, London, UK.,Child Outcomes Research Consortium, The Kantor Centre of Excellence, London, UK
| | - Miranda Wolpert
- Research Department for Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.,Wellcome Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Li L, Childs AW. Using a Patient Safety/Quality Improvement Model to Assess Telehealth for Psychiatry and Behavioral Health Services Among Special Populations During COVID-19 and Beyond. J Psychiatr Pract 2021; 27:245-253. [PMID: 34398574 PMCID: PMC8318385 DOI: 10.1097/pra.0000000000000555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Telehealth has been rapidly deployed in the environment of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to help meet critical mental health needs. As systems of care use telehealth during the pandemic and evaluate the future of telehealth services beyond the crisis, a quality and safety framework may be useful in weighing important considerations for using telehealth to provide psychiatric and behavioral health services within special populations. Examining access to care, privacy, diversity, inclusivity, and sustainability of telehealth to meet behavioral and psychiatric care needs in geriatric and disadvantaged youth populations can help highlight key considerations for health care organizations in an increasingly electronic health care landscape.
Collapse
|
27
|
Connors E, Lawson G, Wheatley-Rowe D, Hoover S. Exploration, Preparation, and Implementation of Standardized Assessment in a Multi-agency School Behavioral Health Network. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021; 48:464-481. [PMID: 32940885 PMCID: PMC7965785 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-020-01082-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
School mental health treatment services offer broad public health impact and could benefit from more widespread implementation and sustainment of standardized assessments (SA). This demonstration study describes one approach to increase SA use in a large school behavioral health network using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Mental health administrator interviews with four participating agencies and a multidisciplinary planning team informed SA measure selection and implementation supports. The SA initiative was implemented during one school year, including system-wide training and ongoing implementation supports for 95 clinicians. Linear mixed effect models revealed improvements in clinician attitudes about the SA for clinical utility and treatment planning immediately following the half-day training (N = 95, p < .001). Clinicians self-reported a significant increase in use of SA for new clients during intakes (p < .001) over time and 71.4% of expected SA data were submitted. Qualitative feedback, including recommendations to offer more SA choices and beginning new SA data collection earlier in the school year, was integrated to inform quality improvements and future sustainment efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Connors
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, 389 Whitney Avenue, Office 106, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
| | - Gwendolyn Lawson
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, 2716 South Street, 8th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA
| | - Denise Wheatley-Rowe
- Behavioral Health System Baltimore, 100 South Charles Street, Tower 2, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 20201, USA
| | - Sharon Hoover
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Center for School Mental Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 737 West Lombard Street, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hong RH, Murphy JK, Michalak EE, Chakrabarty T, Wang Z, Parikh SV, Culpepper L, Yatham LN, Lam RW, Chen J. Implementing Measurement-Based Care for Depression: Practical Solutions for Psychiatrists and Primary Care Physicians. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2021; 17:79-90. [PMID: 33469295 PMCID: PMC7813452 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s283731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Measurement-based care (MBC) can be defined as the clinical practice in which care providers collect patient data through validated outcome scales and use the results to guide their decision-making processes. Despite growing evidence supporting the effectiveness of MBC for depression and other mental health conditions, many physicians and mental health clinicians have yet to adopt MBC practice. In part, this is due to individual and organizational barriers to implementing MBC in busy clinical settings. In this paper, we briefly review the evidence for the efficacy of MBC focusing on pharmacological management of depression and provide example clinical scenarios to illustrate its potential clinical utility in psychiatric settings. We discuss the barriers and challenges for MBC adoption and then address these by suggesting simple solutions to implement MBC for depression care, including recommended outcome scales, monitoring tools, and technology solutions such as cloud-based MBC services and mobile health apps for mood tracking. The availability of MBC tools, ranging from paper-pencil questionnaires to mobile health technology, can allow psychiatrists and clinicians in all types of practice settings to easily incorporate MBC into their practices and improve outcomes for their patients with depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Ha Hong
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jill K Murphy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Erin E Michalak
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Trisha Chakrabarty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Zuowei Wang
- Hongkou Mental Health Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sagar V Parikh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Larry Culpepper
- Department of Family Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lakshmi N Yatham
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Raymond W Lam
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jun Chen
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|