Geographic Disparities in Access to Specialty Care Programs for Early Psychosis in Washington State

Alternative combusted tobacco product and multiple tobacco product use among individuals with serious mental illness enrolled in a large pragmatic randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Use of combustible alternative tobacco products (ATPs; e.g., little cigars, loose tobacco, multiple tobacco product types [TPTs]) is increasingly common. Inexpensive, combusted ATPs (e.g little cigars) are predominantly marketed to lower-income communities. Prevalence of combusted ATP use among those with serious mental illness (SMI) is unknown.

METHODS

We examined rates and correlates of combusted ATP use and association with tobacco abstinence in a secondary analysis of a single-cohort (N = 1007) trial of tobacco-smoking adults with SMI and severe SMI-related functional impairment. The parent study aimed to test a community-health worker-delivered intervention for promoting smoking cessation among adults with SMI. Participants were surveyed at baseline on demographic and smoking characteristics including combusted TPT (cigarettes, cigars/little cigars, loose tobacco), and breath carbon-monoxide (CO). CO-verified 7-day point-prevalence tobacco abstinence was assessed at Year 2.

RESULTS

At baseline, 59% of participants reported using cigarettes only, 25% multiple (>1) combusted TPTs, 12% cigars/little cigars only, and 4% loose tobacco (e.g., "rollies", pipes) only. Those reporting any ATP use at baseline had higher expired CO concentration and reported using more tobacco products per day than exclusive cigarette users (p's < 0.05). ATP use was not associated with abstinence in adjusted logistic regression models (p's > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of ATPs was associated with use of more tobacco products per day and greater tobacco toxicant exposure than exclusive cigarette use in this population. Future policy efforts work to change preferential taxation policies (e.g., lower taxation for cigar products) and disproportionate marketing of ATPs to lower-income communities.

Study protocol for a multi-level cross-sectional study on the equitable reach and implementation of coordinated specialty care for early psychosis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 115,000 young adults will experience their first episode of psychosis (FEP) each year in the USA. Coordinated specialty care (CSC) for early psychosis is an evidence-based early intervention model that has demonstrated effectiveness by improving quality of life and reducing psychiatric symptoms for many individuals. Over the last decade, there has significant increase in the implementation of CSC programs throughout the USA. However, prior research has revealed difficulties among individuals and their family members accessing CSC. Research has also shown that CSC programs often report the limited reach of their program to underserved populations and communities (e.g., ethnoracial minorities, rural and low socioeconomic neighborhoods). Dissemination and implementation research focused on the equitable reach and implementation of CSC is needed to address disparities at the individual level.

METHODS

The proposed study will create a novel integrative multi-level geospatial database of CSC programs implemented throughout the USA that will include program-level data (e.g., geocoded location, capacity, setting, role availability), provider-level data (race, ethnicity, professional credentials), and neighborhood-level census data (e.g., residential segregation, ethnic density, area deprivation, rural-urban continua, public transit time). This database will be used to characterize variations in CSC programs by geographical location and examine the overall reach CSC programs to specific communities. The quantitative data will be combined with qualitative data from state administrators, providers, and service users that will inform the development of dissemination tools, such as an interactive dashboard, that can aid decision making.

DISCUSSION

Findings from this study will highlight the impact of outer contextual determinants on implementation and reach of mental health services, and will serve to inform the future implementation of CSC programs with a primary focus on equity.

Area-level deprivation and adverse childhood experiences among high school students in Maryland

BACKGROUND

Nearly one-half of Americans have been exposed to at least one adverse childhood experience (ACE) before turning 18, contributing to a broad array of problems spanning physical health, mental and behavioral health, and psychosocial functioning.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, survey research study, using 2018 data from a state adolescent health surveillance system, i.e., Maryland Youth Risk Behavior Survey/Youth Tobacco Survey. The population-based sample of Maryland high school students (n = 41,091) is representative at the state and county levels. The outcome variables included five binary measures of ACEs (i.e., food insecurity, parental substance use/gambling, parental mental illness, family member in jail/prison, and caregiver verbal abuse), and number of ACEs. The main exposure variable, area-level socioeconomic disadvantage, was assessed at the county level using a continuous measure of the area deprivation index (ADI). Additional covariates included: rural county status, age, race/ethnicity, sex, and sexual or gender minority (SGM) status. We used mixed-effect multivariate logistic regression to estimate the odds of ACEs in association with socioeconomic deprivation. Models were adjusted for all covariates.

RESULTS

County-level ADI was associated with 3 of the 5 ACES [i.e., food insecurity (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07-1.13), parental substance use/gambling (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07), and incarceration of a family member (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09-1.19)]; and with having at least one ACE (i.e., OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.10). Odds of reporting at least one ACE were higher among girls, older adolescents (i.e., aged 16 and ≥ 17 relative to those aged ≤ 14 years), and among SGM, Black, and Latinx students (all ORs > 1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

ACEs greatly increase risk for adolescent risk behaviors. We observed an increased likelihood of adversity among youth in more deprived counties and among Black, Latinx, or SGM youth, suggesting that social and structural factors play a role in determining the adversity that youth face. Therefore, efforts to address structural factors (e.g., food access, family financial support, imprisonment as a sanction for criminal behavior) could be a critical strategy for primary prevention of ACEs and promoting adolescent health.