Acute bilateral pulmonary emboli occurring while on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy with anastrozole: case report and review of the literature

[Medical treatments for male infertility]

BACKGROUND

Treatments to stimulate spermatogenesis and antioxidant food supplements are often offered to infertile patients either before sperm extraction surgery to improve results, or as part of medically assisted reproduction or spontaneous fertility to increase the likelihood of a live birth.

METHODS

A bibliographic search limited to English-language literature on men published before 5/2023 was carried out, including clinical trials, literature reviews and meta-analyses on spermatogenesis-stimulating molecules and antioxidant treatments.

RESULTS

Several medical treatments seem capable of improving male fertility: they act mainly by stimulating spermatogenesis through hormones, or by reducing the effects of oxidative stress. With regard to oligoasthenozoospermia, the literature shows that certain hormonal treatments stimulating spermatogenesis are useful. In the case of non-obstructive azoospermia, the value of treatment depends on the patient's FSH and testosterone levels. AOX supplementation appears to improve certain spermogram parameters and have an impact on pregnancy and live birth rates.

CONCLUSION

This review should help urologists gain a better understanding of the various medical treatments and enable them to define an appropriate therapeutic strategy, tailored to the patient and the couple, in order to obtain the best results.

Aortic Thrombus Extending to Left Subclavian in a Patient With Diffuse Venous Thromboembolism on Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy

Concomitant arterial and venous thrombosis is an infrequent event often associated with malignancy, hyperhomocysteinemia, and thrombophilic conditions. Some overlapping pathophysiology mechanisms suggest an association between arterial and venous thrombosis. It is reported that thrombosis in the arterial and venous systems develops through distinct mechanisms affecting inflammatory and oxidative pathways. Recently, the aromatase inhibitors have moved to the forefront of adjuvant hormonal therapy, however, the adverse effects of these agents are not yet fully understood. It is generally accepted that tamoxifen, but not aromatase inhibitors, is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis in women with breast cancer. Here, we report an unusual case of an 87-year-old female on anastrozole therapy with aortic thrombus extending into the left subclavian artery with associated diffuse venous thromboembolism (VTE). An 87-year-old-female with a history of breast cancer in remission, obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia presented to the emergency department with new onset of left arm weakness and tingling sensation. Vital signs showed respiratory rate of 20 per minute, oxygen saturation of 95% on 3 L of oxygen via nasal cannula, blood pressure of 150/79 mmHg, and pulse 81 beats per minute. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) neck showed an aortic thrombus extending into the left subclavian artery and bilateral pulmonary emboli (PE). Doppler ultrasound of the lower extremities showed a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the left lower extremity. Echocardiography showed no patent foramen ovale. She was started on continuous heparin infusion and subsequently transitioned to an oral anticoagulation medication upon discharge. Symptomatic ischemic lesions of the upper extremity due to thrombosis of the subclavian artery are extremely rare, occurring in less than one percent of the population. While this patient had a history of early-stage breast cancer, she was on adjuvant anastrozole therapy with no evidence of recurrence or further tumor burden as per her outpatient oncologist, who also followed her during her hospital stay. She also had no prior history of thromboembolic disease or clotting disorders. Her only risk factors appear to be her age and her obesity (with a BMI over 30). Nevertheless, the extent of thromboembolism seen in this patient is greater than that might be expected with these factors. This case highlights a concomitant rarity of arterial and venous thrombosis. Also, there are not enough studies on anastrozole effect on thromboembolism. Given these risk factors, we recommend a high degree of suspicion for VTE in patients who are on anastrozole therapy.

Time-dependent risk and predictors of venous thromboembolism in breast cancer patients: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication of cancer and its treatment. The current study assessed the risk and clinical predictors of VTE in breast cancer patients by time since diagnosis.

METHODS

This Swedish population-based study included 8338 breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2001 to 2008 in the Stockholm-Gotland region with complete follow-up until 2012. Their incidence of VTE was compared with the incidence among 39,013 age-matched reference individuals from the general population. Cox and flexible parametric models were used to examine associations with patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, accounting for time-dependent effects.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 426 breast cancer patients experienced a VTE event (cumulative incidence, 5.1%). The VTE incidence was 3-fold increased (hazard ratio [HR], 3.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.87-3.74) in comparison with the incidence in the general population and was highest 6 months after diagnosis (HR, 8.62; 95% CI, 6.56-11.33) with a sustained increase in risk thereafter (HR at 5 years, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.80-2.67). Independent predictors of VTE included the following: older age, being overweight, preexisting VTE, comorbid disease, tumor size > 40 mm, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative status, more than 4 affected lymph nodes, and receipt of chemo- and endocrine therapy. The impact of chemotherapy was limited to early-onset VTE, whereas comorbid disease and PR-negative status were more strongly associated with late-onset events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the long-term risk of VTE in breast cancer patients and identifies a comprehensive set of clinical risk predictors. Temporal associations with patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics provide insight into the time-dependent etiology of VTE. Cancer 2017;123:468-475. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Detecting adverse drug reactions following long-term exposure in longitudinal observational data: The exposure-adjusted self-controlled case series

Most approaches used in postmarketing drug safety monitoring, including spontaneous reporting and statistical risk identification using electronic health care records, are primarily suited to pick up only acute adverse drug effects. With the availability of increasingly larger electronic health record and administrative claims databases comes the opportunity to monitor for potential adverse effects that occur only after prolonged exposure to a drug, but analysis methods are lacking. We propose an adaptation of the self-controlled case series design that uses the notion of accumulated exposure to capture long-term effects of drugs and evaluate extensions to correct for age and recurrent events. Several variations of the approach are tested on simulated data and two large insurance claims databases. To evaluate performance a set of positive and negative control drug–event pairs was created by medical experts based on drug product labels and review of the literature. Performance on the real data was measured using the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve. The best performing method achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of 0.86 in the largest database using a spline model, adjustment for age, and ignoring recurrent events, but it appears this performance can only be achieved with very large data sets.

The use of concurrent hormonotherapy and radiotherapy does not deteriorate radiation-induced cardiac toxicity

Postmenopausal patients with breast cancer have two options for adjuvant endocrine therapy, tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as well as radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. However, there is limited data regarding the optimal sequencing of RT and tamoxifen/AIs. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effects of tamoxifen and AIs on radiation-induced cardiotoxicity. Eighty ovariectomized rats were divided into eight groups (G). G1 was defined as a control group; G2, G3, G4, and G5 were RT, tamoxifen, anastrozle, and letrozole groups, respectively; G6, G7, and G8 were RT plus tamoxifen, anastrozle, and letrozole groups, respectively. Drugs were started 1 week before RT and continued until the animals were killed 16 weeks after RT. The heart tissues were then dissected and examined with light microscopy to determine endocardial thickness and cardiac fibrosis. The endocardial thickness scores of both RT alone and the tamoxifen groups as well as the cardiac fibrosis score of RT alone were higher than that the control group ( p < 0.05 for all). There was no difference in the endocardial thickness and cardiac fibrosis scores of the RT-only group and the RT plus hormonotherapy groups ( p > 0.05 for all). Concurrent administration of RT and hormonal therapy with either tamoxifen or AIs did not further amplify radiation-induced cardiac toxicity. This issue warrants further study.

Testosterone therapy, thrombosis, thrombophilia, cardiovascular events

There are similar time intervals between starting testosterone therapy (TT) and development of thrombotic (~4.5 months) or cardiovascular (CVD) events (~3 months) which may, speculatively, reflect a shared pathophysiology. We have described thrombotic events 5 months (median) after starting TT in 38 men and 4 women, including 27 with deep venous thrombosis-pulmonary embolism, 12 with osteonecrosis, 1 with central retinal vein thrombosis, 1 with amaurosis fugax, and 1 with spinal cord infarction. In 8 men whose TT was continued, second thrombotic events occurred despite adequate anticoagulation with Coumadin in 8 men, 3 of whom had a third thrombotic event. Of these 42 cases, 40 had measures of thrombophilia-hypofibrinolysis, and 39 were found to have previously undiagnosed thrombophilia-hypofibrinolysis. Before beginning TT, especially in men with previous history of thrombotic events, we suggest that, at a minimum, measurements be made for the Factor V Leiden and Prothrombin mutations, Factors VIII and XI, and homocysteine, to identify men who should not receive TT. We need prospective data focused on whether there should be pre-TT screening based on history of previous venous thromboembolism or for all subjects for major gene thrombophilias. To better resolve questions about TT and all cause and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and thrombosis, a long term, prospective, randomized, blinded study following the example of the Women's Health Initiative is needed. While we wait for prospective placebo-controlled TT outcome data, TT should be restricted to men with well-defined androgen deficiency syndromes.

Acute cerebrovascular accident after cisplatin treatment in a patient taking letrozole

Vascular thrombotic events are common in patients with cancer and chemotherapy is considered a contributing factor. Venous thrombotic events are more common than arterial ones which are less documented. In this report, we describe a patient with right homonymous hemianopsia following treatment with cisplatin for small cell lung carcinoma while also taking letrozole. A brief review of the literature on arterial thrombotic events after chemotherapy follows.

Thrombotic events after starting exogenous testosterone in men with previously undiagnosed familial thrombophilia

Our specific aim was to describe thrombosis (osteonecrosis of the hips, pulmonary embolism, and amaurosis fugax) after exogenous testosterone was given to men with no antecedent thrombosis and previously undiagnosed familial thrombophilia. After starting testosterone patch or gel, 50 mg/day or intramuscular testosterone 400 mg IM/month, 2 men developed bilateral hip osteonecrosis 5 and 6 months later, and 3 developed pulmonary embolism 3, 7, and 17 months later. One man developed amaurosis fugax 18 months after starting testosterone gel 50 mg/day. Of these 6 men, 5 were found to have previously undiagnosed factor V Leiden heterozygosity, 1 of whom had ancillary MTHFR C677T homozygosity, and 2 with ancillary MTHFR C677T-A1298C compound heterozygosity. One man had high factor VIII (195%), factor XI (179%), and homocysteine (29.3 umol/L). Thrombotic events after starting testosterone therapy are associated with familial thrombophilia. We speculate that when exogenous testosterone is aromatized to E2, and E2-induced thrombophilia is superimposed on familial thrombophilia, thrombosis occurs. Men sustaining thrombotic events on testosterone therapy should be screened for the factor V Leiden mutation and other familial and acquired thrombophilias.

Acquired thrombotic risk factors in the critical care setting

Acquired thrombotic risk factors include a variety of noninherited clinical conditions that can predispose an individual to an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. For patients in a critical care setting, certain acquired risk factors represent chronic conditions that the patients may have had before the current acute illness (e.g., malignancy, various cardiovascular risk factors, certain medications), whereas others may be directly related to the reason the patient is in an intensive care unit or the patient's management there (e.g., postoperative state, trauma, indwelling vascular access, certain medications). Optimal thromboprophylactic strategies depend on individual patient risk profiles including an assessment of the specific clinical setting. Treatment for patients with acquired thrombotic risk factors includes anticoagulant therapy and, if possible, resolution of the acquired risk factor(s). Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia represents a unique clinical situation in which all sources of heparin must be discontinued and the patient started on an alternative anticoagulant (e.g., a direct thrombin inhibitor) in the acute setting. The duration of anticoagulant therapy would vary depending on the specific clinical setting.

The link between cancer and venous thromboembolism: a review

Cancer is the most important acquired but often overlooked risk factor for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Tumors can express procoagulant proteins, for example, and tumor masses may compromise venous blood flow by extrinsic compression of adjacent vessels. Cancers can also induce the production of inflammatory cytokines that indirectly contribute to the development of hypercoagulability and the risk of thromboembolism. Additional risk factors for VTE experienced by patients with cancer include immobilization, because of cancer or its treatment, and the potential presence of thrombophilic genetic factors. Many common therapeutic modalities also increase VTE risk, including surgery, chemotherapy agents, adjuvant hormonal manipulation, the use of angiogenesis inhibitors, and the presence of central venous access devices. The risk of VTE seems to be greater with certain tumor types, such as cancers of the pancreas, kidney, or brain. The value of extensive screening of patients with the first episode of idiopathic thromboembolism for the presence of an occult malignancy remains debatable at this time. VTE continues to pose a substantial risk to patients with cancer because of a variety of tumor-, host-, and therapy-related factors.

Venous thrombotic emergencies

Thrombosis is a common complication of cancer, occurring in up to 15% of patients. This article reviews the diagnosis and management of the most common cancer-related thrombotic problem; deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and catheterrelated thrombosis. Rarer entities, such as cerebral vein thrombosis and Budd-Chiari syndrome, are also reviewed.

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE): an update on clinical presentation, pathophysiology and treatment

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE), though a rare disorder, causes up to 4% of non-variceal upper GI bleeding. This paper gives an overview of studies examining clinical presentation and pathophysiology, and reviews the current evidence for invasive and non-invasive treatments. GAVE is often associated with systemic illnesses, such as cirrhosis of the liver, autoimmune connective tissue disorders, bone marrow transplantation and chronic renal failure. The pathophysiological changes leading to GAVE have not been fully explained and remain controversial. Patient presentation varies from chronic iron-deficiency anaemia to heavy acute gastrointestinal bleeding. It is important to differentiate GAVE from portal hypertensive gastropathy as GAVE does not respond to measures reducing portal pressures. Endoscopic ablation (Nd:YAG-laser or argon plasma coagulation) is the first-line treatment of choice. As evidence for pharmacological therapy with oestrogen (and/or progesterone), tranexamic acid or thalidomide stems from case reports only, these should be used if endoscopic measures have failed to stop chronic blood loss. Surgical antrectomy should be reserved for unresponsive cases as it is associated with a high mortality. Ultimately, treatment of the underlying medical co-morbidities may lead to resolution of GAVE.