Superior outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, anthracycline, and cyclophosphamide versus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide: results from the NATT trial in triple negative or HER2 positive breast cancer

Pathological Changes Following Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy (NAET): A Multicentre Study of 391 Breast Cancers

Oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) is generally well responsive to endocrine therapy. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAET) is increasingly being used for downstaging ER-positive tumours. This study aims to analyse the effect of NAET on a well-characterised cohort of ER-positive BC with particular emphasis on receptor expression. This is a retrospective United Kingdom (UK) multicentre study of 391 patients who received NAET between October 2012 and October 2020. Detailed analyses of the paired pre- and post-NAET morphological changes and hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression were performed. The median duration of NAET was 86 days, with median survival and overall survival rates of 380 days and 93.4%, respectively. A total of 90.3% of cases achieved a pathological partial response, with a significantly higher rate of response in the HER2-low cancers. Following NAET, BC displayed some pathological changes involving the tumour stroma including central scarring and an increase in tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumour cell morphology. Significant changes associated with the duration of NAET were observed in tumour grade (30.6% of cases), with downgrading identified in 19.3% of tumours (p < 0.001). The conversion of ER status from positive to low or negative was insignificant. The conversion of progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 status to negative status was observed in 31.3% and 38.1% of cases, respectively (p < 0.001). HER2-low breast cancer decreased from 63% to 37% following NAET in the paired samples. Significant morphological and biomarker changes involving PR and HER2 expression occurred following NAET. The findings support biomarker testing on pre-treatment core biopsies and post-treatment residual carcinoma.

Long-term survival after neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer under different treatment regimens: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a life-threatening subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options. Therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of various neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) options on the long-term survival of patients with TNBC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and major international conference databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of various NCT options in patients with TNBC. Searches were performed from January 2000 to June 2023. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were used to evaluate the pathologic complete response (pCR). The primary outcome was DFS.

RESULTS

We conducted an NMA of 21 RCTs involving 8873 patients with TNBC. Our study defined the combination of anthracyclines and taxanes as the preferred treatment option. On this basis, the addition of any of the following new drugs is considered a new treatment option: bevacizumab (B), platinum (P), poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values, the top three SUCRA area values of DFS were taxanes, anthracycline, and cyclophosphamide (TAC; 89.23%); CT (84.53%); and B (81.06%). The top three SUCRA area values of OS were CT (83.70%), TAC (62.02%), and B-containing regimens (60.06%). The top three SUCRA area values of pCR were B + P-containing regimens (82.7%), ICI + P-containing regimens (80.2%), and ICI-containing regimens (61.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA showed that standard chemotherapy is a good choice with respect to long-term survival. Moreover, B associated with P-containing regimens is likely to be the optimal treatment option for neoadjuvant TNBC in terms of pCR.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Taxanes With or Without Anthracyclines in Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of taxane (T) based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with T and anthracycline (A) based NAC in different molecular types of breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the date of NAC for BC from 20 hospitals in China from January 2010 to December 2020, 7870 cases were enrolled. The propensity score matching was used to equalize the baseline characteristics. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate, clinical response rate and breast-conserving rate were analyzed.

RESULTS

The efficacy of 2 regimens were similar in luminal A subtype. The breast-conserving rate was higher in T-based NAC in luminal B subtype (17.9% vs. 10.2%, P = .043).The pCR (T0/isN0M0) and tpCR (T0N0M0) rates in T-based NAC were higher than those in TA-based NAC for triple-negative subtype (pCR: 34.5% vs. 25.8%, P = .041, tpCR: 26.9% vs. 17.1%, P = .008). For HER2+(HR-) subtype, the pCR, and tpCR rates were higher in T-based NAC in insufficient anti-HER2 therapy (P < .05), and those were higher in TA-based NAC in dual-target anti-HER2 therapy (pCR: 69.2% vs. 53.8%, P = .254, tpCR: 61.5% vs. 42.3%, P = .165). For HER2+(HR+) breast cancer, both pCR and tpCR rates were higher in TA group, regardless of the adequacy of anti-HER2 treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

T-based NAC could replace TA-based NAC for luminal A, luminal B, and triple-negative early-stage BC, but anthracyclines cannot be abandoned in HER2+ breast cancer. The development of anthracyclines with lower adverse reactions is one of the directions for the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are generally younger and more likely to experience disease recurrence and have the shortest survival among all breast cancer patients. Recently, neoadjuvant delivery of the programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was approved for patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC, but this treatment regimen has not been evaluated in head-to-head trials with other neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab versus other neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC through a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference abstracts, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC. NMA was performed to estimate relative treatment effects among evaluated interventions.

RESULTS

Five trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the NMA. The relative efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was favorable to paclitaxel followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival; paclitaxel + carboplatin followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of pCR and EFS; paclitaxel + bevacizumab followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide + bevacizumab in terms of pCR; and paclitaxel + carboplatin + veliparib followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of EFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab confers benefits in response and survival outcomes versus alternative neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC.

Research Status of Systemic Adjuvant Therapy for Early Breast Cancer

Breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most common cause of cancer deaths, worldwide. Early breast cancers are treatment sensitive and patients under standardized treatment have prolonged. Breast cancer treatment has significantly evolved from the conventional surgical approach and radiotherapy to local and systemic adjuvant therapies. Though localized breast cancers are clinically manageable, distant recurrence is a cause of morbid concern. Adjuvant systemic therapy is effective in both distant and local recurrences and hence gained significant attention. Early breast cancer prognosis has greatly improved in the past 3 decades with reduced mortality rates due to the widespread use of adjuvant therapy. It can markedly increase the cure rate of breast cancers, and postoperative adjuvant therapy became a part of comprehensive breast cancer treatment. Further research to understand the early breast cancer characteristics could expand the treatment modalities that can improve the outcomes and survival benefits of breast cancer patients.

Efficacy analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in female patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in China: a nationwide, multicenter, 10-year retrospective study (CSBrS-012)

Background

In the era of targeted therapy, whether patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer are exempted from anthracycline usage in the neoadjuvant setting is controversial.

Objectives

Our objective was to retrospectively analyze the differences in pathological complete remission (pCR) rates between the anthracycline group and the nonanthracycline group.

Design

The CSBrS-012 study (2010-2020) included female primary breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) who underwent standard breast and axillary surgery post-NAC.

Methods

A logistic proportional hazard model was applied to estimate the association of covariates with pCR. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the differences in baseline characteristics, and subgroup analyses were performed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.

Results

A total of 2507 patients were enrolled: the anthracycline group (n = 1581, 63%) and the nonanthracycline group (n = 926, 37%). A pCR was recorded in 17.1% (271/1581) of patients in the anthracycline group and in 29.3% (271/926) in the nonanthracycline group, and the difference in the pCR rate between the two groups was statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) = 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.65-2.43); p < 0.001). In the subsequent subgroup analysis, substantial differences in pCR rates between the anthracycline and nonanthracycline groups were detected in the nontargeted [OR = 1.91, 95% CI (1.13-3.23); p = 0.015] and dual-HER2-targeted populations [OR = 0.55, 95% CI (0.33-0.92); p = 0.021) before PSM, whereas differences vanished after PSM. The pCR rates between the anthracycline and nonanthracycline groups did not differ for the single target population, either before or after PSM.

Conclusion

In the presence of trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab, the pCR rate of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving anthracycline was not superior to that of patients receiving nonanthracycline. Thus, our study further provides clinical evidence for exempting anthracycline treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer in the era of targeted therapy.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus docetaxel/liposomal doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide for HER2-positive breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pyrotinib is a novel EGFR/HER2 dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed in China, while its role in neoadjuvant therapy of HER2-positive (HER2⁺) breast cancer lacks evidence. The current study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus docetaxel/liposomal doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (TAC) for HER2⁺ breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 27 HER2⁺ breast cancer patients received neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus TAC for 6 cycles, then surgery was performed. The clinical and pathological responses, and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Complete response rate, objective response rate, and disease control rate were 0.0%, 44.4% and 100.0% after 2 treatment cycles; 0.0%, 37.0%, and 100.0% after 4 treatment cycles; 37.0%, 37.0%, and 96.3% after 6 treatment cycles; as well as 37.0%, 44.4%, and 100.0% based on the best clinical response. Regarding pathological response, there were 1 (2.7%), 3 (11.1%), 8 (29.6%), 5 (18.5%), and 10 (37.0%) patients realizing Miller-Payne grade (G) 1, G2, G3, G4, and G5, respectively; besides, 10 (37.0%) patients achieved total pathological complete response (pCR), 10 (37.0%) patients realized pCR in breast, and 23 (85.2%) patients achieved pCR in lymph node. Additionally, adverse events included diarrhea (81.5%), dental ulcer (7.4%), and hand-foot syndrome (3.7%); meanwhile, grade 3-4 adverse event consisted of only diarrhea (11.1%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus TAC treatment is efficient and safe in HER2⁺ breast cancer patients, while further validation is needed.

Comparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Complications by Type of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before mastectomy helps reduce tumor burden and pathologic response in breast cancer. Limited evidence exists regarding how neoadjuvant chemotherapy impacts outcomes following microvascular breast reconstruction. This study examines the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and schedules on microvascular breast reconstruction complication rates and also assesses the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on circulating immune cells related to wound healing.

METHODS

Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and microvascular breast reconstruction at Yale New Haven Hospital between 2013 and 2018 were identified. Demographic variables, oncologic history, chemotherapy regimens, and complication profiles were collected. Chemotherapy regimens were stratified by inclusion of anthracycline and order of taxane administration. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t tests were used for univariate analysis. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to control for covariates.

RESULTS

One hundred patients met inclusion criteria. On multivariate analysis, the administration of taxane first in an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy sequence was associated with increased complications (OR, 3.521; p = 0.012), particularly fat necrosis (OR, 2.481; p = 0.040). In the logistic regression model evaluating the effect of the taxane-first regimen on complication rates, the area under the curve was estimated to be 0.760 (p < 0.0001), particularly fat necrosis 0.635 (p < 0.05). The dosage of chemotherapy, number of days between neoadjuvant chemotherapy completion and surgery, and number of circulating immune cells did not significantly differ among patients who experienced complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Taxane-first, anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens were associated with increased complications, particularly fat necrosis. The increased postreconstruction complication risk must be weighed against the benefits of taxane-first regimens in improving tumor outcome.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Endocrine Therapy for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast With High Hormone Receptor Positivity and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negativity

IMPORTANCE

Although neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is an alternative to chemotherapy for strongly hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2)-negative breast cancer, evidence is currently lacking regarding the probable survival outcomes of NET in comparison with those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for this cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate all-cause mortality among patients with strongly HR-positive and ERBB2-negative breast cancer treated with NET vs NACT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included patients with a diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with strong HR positivity and ERBB2 negativity, treated between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2016, with follow-up from the index date (ie, date of IDC diagnosis) to December 31, 2018. The data came from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. Data were analyzed from January to November 2020.

EXPOSURES

NET vs NACT for IDC with strong HR positivity and ERBB2 negativity.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching was performed, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze all-cause mortality among patients undergoing different neoadjuvant treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 640 patients (297 [46.4%] aged 20-49 years) undergoing NET (145 patients [22.7%]) or NACT (495 patients [77.3%]) were eligible for further analysis. In the multivariate Cox regression analyses, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for all-cause mortality among the NET cohort compared with the NACT cohort was 2.67 (95% CI, 1.95-3.51; P < .001). The aHRs for age were 1.13 (95% CI, 1.03-2.24), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.13-2.45), and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.17-3.49) for all-cause mortality among patients aged 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 years or older, respectively, compared with those aged 20 to 49 years (P = .002); the aHR for all-cause mortality among premenopausal women was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.13-1.56) compared with postmenopausal women (P < .001); and that of patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 2 or greater was 1.77 (1.37-2.26) compared with those with a score of 0 (P < .001). The aHRs of all-cause mortality for clinical tumor stage 2, 3, and 4 compared with 1 were 1.84 (95% CI, 1.07-3.40), 1.97 (95% CI, 1.03-3.77), and 2.49 (95% CI, 1.29-4.81), respectively (P = .009). The aHRs for all-cause mortality by clinical nodal (cN) stages were 1.49 (95% CI, 1.13-1.99) and 1.84 (95% CI, 1.31-2.61) for cN stage 1 and cN stages 2 or 3, respectively, compared with cN stage 0 (P = .005); those for differentiation were 1.77 (95% CI, 1.24-2.54) and 2.31 (95% CI, 1.61-3.34) for differentiation grade 2 and differentiation grade 3, respectively, compared with differentiation grade 1 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that for patients with strongly HR-positive and ERBB2-negative IDC, NACT may be considered the first choice for neoadjuvant treatment.

A correlation analysis to assess event-free survival as a trial-level surrogate for overall survival in early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Event-free survival (EFS) has been listed on the FDA Table of Surrogate Endpoints as a surrogate measure that can be considered for accelerated or traditional approval in breast cancer. However, no studies have evaluated the correlation between the treatment effects on EFS and treatment effects on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the literature until May 2020 according to the PRISMA guideline for all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in early breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting. Data on EFS and OS, including the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), were extracted from each study and the association between the trial-level EFS HR and the trial-level OS HR was estimated using a linear mixed-effects model on the log scale.

FINDINGS

Of the 7 RCTs (N = 2211) included in the analysis, 5 included patients with HER2 positive tumor type. The estimated linear association between log HR EFS and log HR OS indicated a positive slope ( β  = 0.58 [95% CI: -0.32-1.48]) and the coefficient of determination confirmed a moderate trial-level association between log HRs for OS and EFS (R² 0.76 [95% CI 0.34-1.00], but with wide confidence intervals.

INTERPRETATION

Treatment effects in EFS are moderately correlated with treatment effects in OS in early breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting, but the association was not significant. Thus, there is currently insufficient evidence to support EFS for use as a surrogate endpoint for traditional approval, although it may be considered for accelerated approval.

FUNDING

Arnold Ventures.

Evaluation of Pathologic Complete Response as a Surrogate for Long-Term Survival Outcomes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background: Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a common efficacy endpoint in neoadjuvant therapy trials for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Previous studies have shown that pCR is strongly associated with improved long-term survival outcomes, including event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the trial-level associations between treatment effect on pCR and long-term survival outcomes are not well established. This study sought to evaluate these associations by incorporating more recent clinical trials in TNBC. Methods: A literature review identified published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neoadjuvant therapy for TNBC that reported results for both pCR and EFS/OS. Meta-regression models were performed to evaluate the association of treatment effect on pCR and EFS/OS. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of divergent study designs. Results: Ten comparisons from 8 RCTs (N=2,478 patients) were identified from the literature review. The log (odds ratio) of pCR was a significant predictor of the log (hazard ratio) of EFS (P=.003), with a coefficient of determination of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.41–0.95). There was a weaker association between pCR and OS (P=.18), with a coefficient of determination of 0.24 (95% CI, 0.01–0.77). Consistent results were found in the exploratory analysis and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: This is the first study that has shown a trial-level association between pCR and survival outcomes in TNBC. By incorporating the most up-to-date RCTs, this study showed a significant trial-level association between pCR and EFS. A positive association between pCR and OS was also recorded.

Neo-adjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer: Insights from a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The best regimen of neo-adjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unknown. Recent studies have shown promising data that adding carboplatin or pembrolizumab improves the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in TNBC. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to define the overall, most effective, neo-adjuvant systemic therapy for TNBC.

METHODS

We searched for studies comparing different neo-adjuvant regimens in patients with TNBC. We performed a network meta-analysis comparing the regimens using the random-effects model. We focused on anthracycline, bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, and platinum salts (Pl). All study regimens contained a taxane. We analyzed the rate of pCR (ypT0/is, N0), and the incidence of febrile neutropenia, grade 3-grade 4 thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 13 randomized control trials for this analysis. We compared ten different classes of regimens. We found that regimens containing Pl were significantly superior to non-PI-containing regimens for the rate of pCR. Similarly, pembrolizumab-containing regimens were associated with significantly higher pCR rates. Regimens containing bevacizumab significantly increased the rate of pCR as well. However, it was equivocal as to whether the addition of Pl to pembrolizumab-containing regimen increases pCR rates. Adding anthracycline into the regimen did not show an improved rate of pCR. In the safety analysis, regimens containing Pl were associated with a significantly higher incidence of febrile neutropenia and grade 3-grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The regimen containing anthracycline plus bevacizumab plus Pl was associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

For TNBC, regimens containing bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, or Pl are most effective in terms of pCR rates, though it is unclear whether combining all these medications has the greatest efficacy. Additionally, the benefit of using anthracycline in the neo-adjuvant therapy regimen for TNBC is not apparent, which may warrant a further head-to-head comparison.

Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Clinical trial reports often emphasize efficacy over harms, leading to misinterpretation of the risk-to-benefit ratio of new therapies. Clear and sufficiently detailed reporting of methods and results is especially important in the abstracts of trial reports, as readers often base their assessment of a trial on such information. In this study, we evaluated the quality of adverse event (AE) reporting and abstract quality in phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies in breast and colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of RCTs, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from November 2005 to September 2018. Phase III RCTs evaluating systemic therapies in breast or colorectal cancer were included. Each article was independently reviewed by two investigators using a standardized data extraction form based on guidelines developed by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and multivariable linear regression were used to analyze data. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Of 166 RCTs identified, 99.4% reported harms in the manuscript body, and 59.6% reported harms in the abstract. Reporting was restricted to severe harms in 15.6% of RCTs. Statistical comparison of AE rates went unreported in 59.0% of studies. Information regarding AEs leading to dose reductions, treatment discontinuations, or study withdrawals went unreported in 59.3%, 18.7%, and 86.8% of studies, respectively. Recently published RCTs (P = .009) and those sponsored at least partially by for-profit companies (P = .003) had higher abstract quality scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast and colorectal cancer phase III RCTs inadequately report CONSORT-compliant AE data. Improved guideline adherence and abstract reporting is required to properly weigh benefits and harms of new oncologic therapies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019140673.

A high mitotic score in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is predictive of outcome and associated with a distinct morphology

AIMS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is frequently used for the treatment of breast cancer. We sought to analyse the clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical features of tumours from patients who did not achieve pathological complete response following NAC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified stage I-III post-NAC breast cancers from surgical resections (2000-2016) with evaluable residual invasive carcinoma [ypT1a(m) or greater and ≥15% tumour cellularity]. One hundred and forty-three tumours from 142 patients were included. On univariable analysis, a high (score 3) post-NAC mitotic score (as compared with 1 or 2) was significantly associated with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) subtype (P = 0.023), high grade, pushing borders with zones of necrosis, hormone receptor and triple-negative status, lack of hormonal therapy, higher cellularity (P < 0.001), and a higher percentage of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (P = 0.016). Multivariable analysis showed a high post-NAC mitotic score to be significantly associated with recurrence, distant metastasis, and shortened survival (hazard ratios of 5.73, 4.49, and 3.68, respectively). High post-NAC mitotic score tumours (n = 32) were IDC and had a high Ki67 proliferation index (median, 55%). Of these, 24 (75%) had pushing borders with zones of necrosis; 19 (79.2%) of these had necrosis on preoperative imaging, and 24 (75%), 15 (46.9%) and four (12.5%) lacked androgen receptor, GATA-3 and cytokeratin 18 expression, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

High post-NAC mitotic score breast cancers cause high morbidity and mortality, frequently have pushing borders and zones of necrosis, and may show loss of common 'breast cancer markers'. Our findings support that necrosis in pretreatment studies and post-NAC mitotic score should be routinely reported, as they offer significant additional prognostic information to guide management.

A Potential Anti-Tumor Herb Bred in a Tropical Fruit: Insight into the Chemical Components and Pharmacological Effects of Momordicae Semen

Gac fruit (Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng) is a popular tropical fruit in southeast Asia. What is amazing is that its seeds (Momordicae Semen) and arils are traditional herbs with anti-tumor activity, and have protected human health for more than 1000 years. In recent years, its anti-tumor activity has received extensive attention and research. This manuscript summarized the chemical composition of saponins, fatty acids, volatile constituents, proteins, peptides, and other components from Momordicae Semen (MSE). The effect and mechanism of MSE and its extract on breast cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, esophagus cancer, melanomas, and human cervical epithelial carcinoma were discussed. In addition, its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and other pharmacological effects were also analyzed. We hope that this review will provide new ideas for the treatment of cancer and other diseases, and become a reference for the further research into complementary and alternative medicine.

Breast Cancer Biomarkers: Challenges in Routine Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2/neu Evaluation

Context.—

Evaluation of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2/neu (HER2) biomarkers is standard of care for all cases of newly diagnosed invasive, recurrent, and metastatic breast cancer. Repeat analysis is also performed in select cases per College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines and other clinical indications. However, in specific scenarios, preanalytic and analytic variables may pose distinct challenges to testing.

Objective.—

To provide a review of select challenges in the testing of commonly performed breast cancer biomarkers ER, PR, and HER2 and outline best practices for overcoming these challenges.

Data Sources.—

Review of College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations, current literature, and personal experience of the author.

Conclusions.—

Attention must be given to specimen handling to ensure accurate ER, PR, and HER2 biomarker assessment and appropriate management of breast cancer patients.

Multivariate machine learning models for prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using MRI features: a study using an independent validation set

PURPOSE

To determine whether a multivariate machine learning-based model using computer-extracted features of pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study of 288 breast cancer patients at our institution who received NAT and had a pre-treatment breast MRI. A comprehensive set of 529 radiomic features was extracted from each patient's pre-treatment MRI. The patients were divided into equal groups to form a training set and an independent test set. Two multivariate machine learning models (logistic regression and a support vector machine) based on imaging features were trained to predict pCR in (a) all patients with NAT, (b) patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and (c) triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (TN/HER2+) patients who had NAT. The multivariate models were tested using the independent test set, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated.

RESULTS

Out of the 288 patients, 64 achieved pCR. The AUC values for predicting pCR in TN/HER+ patients who received NAT were significant (0.707, 95% CI 0.582-0.833, p < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The multivariate models based on pre-treatment MRI features were able to predict pCR in TN/HER2+ patients.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Who Should Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Progress in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer remains an important challenge. Given the aggressive biology and high risk of distant recurrence, systemic chemotherapy is warranted in most patients. Neaodjuvant chemotherapy benefits patients with locally advanced disease by downsizing the tumor and increasing the probability of breast-conserving surgery. Clinical and pathologic responses provide important prognostic information, which makes neoadjuvant therapy an attractive approach for all patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Clinical research in the neoadjuvant setting is focused on improvement in pathologic complete response rates and outcomes of patients with residual disease.

Xihuang pill promotes apoptosis of Treg cells in the tumor microenvironment in 4T1 mouse breast cancer by upregulating MEKK1/SEK1/JNK1/AP-1 pathway

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of the MEKK1/SEK1/JNK1/AP-1 pathway in the action of Xihuang pill (XHP) in reducing regulatory T (Treg) cell numbers in the tumor microenvironment in a 4T1 mouse breast cancer model, and to clarify the anti-tumor mechanism of XHP in breast cancer.

METHODS

We established a mouse 4T1 breast cancer model. Model mice were administered XHP for 2 weeks, and tumor tissues were then removed, weighed, sliced, and homogenized. Treg cells in the tumor microenvironment were isolated by magnetic cell sorting and analyzed by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Treg cell apoptosis was detected by TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling. mRNA expression levels of MEKK1, SEK1, JNK1, and AP-1 in Treg cells in the tumor microenvironment were detected by quantitative real-time PCR and their protein expression levels were detected by immunofluorescence staining and western blot.

RESULTS

Tumor weights were significantly lower in the XHP groups compared with the untreated control group. The overall number of Treg cells in the tumor microenvironment decreased while the number of apoptotic Treg cells increased with increasing doses of XHP. mRNA and protein expression levels of MEKK1, SEK1, JNK1, and AP-1 in Treg cells in the tumor microenvironment increased with increasing doses of XHP.

CONCLUSION

XHP might promote Treg cell apoptosis in the tumor microenvironment and further inhibit the tumor growth of 4T1 mouse breast cancer. The mechanism of XHP may be related to upregulation of gene and protein expression of MEKK1, SEK1, JNK1, and AP-1 in Treg cells in the tumor microenvironment.

Phase II study of adjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin with/without doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in triple negative breast cancer: a randomised controlled clinical trial

Aim of the study

The aim of this trial was to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity of two adjuvant regimens in triple negative patients with Iranian ethnicity.

Material and methods

In a phase II trial, patients with previously untreated triple negative breaststroke cancer were randomly assigned by using docetaxel 70 mg/m² and carboplatin AUC = 7 every three weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for sin courses (arm A) or doxorubicin hydrochloride 60 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² every three weeks with G-CSF for four courses followed by docetaxel 70 mg/m² and carboplatin AUC = 7 every three weeks with G-CSF for four courses (arm B).

Results

A total of 119 patients were randomly enrolled in our study (60 patients in Arm A and 59 patients in Arm B) between 2011 and 2016. The mean follow-up was 40 months at the time of treatment analysis. The 2-year and 5-year DFS rates for Arm A were 92.7% vs. 85% and for Arm B were 82.6% vs. 64.4%. The 2-year and 5-year OS rates for Arm A were 96.5% vs. 91.7% and for Arm B were 90.5% vs. 81.3%. There was a significant correlation for DFS and OS in the two arms. There was no significant difference between adverse events with the two regimens.

Conclusions

In our research, less progression was found with Arm A as compared to Arm B. Adding of anthracyclines such as doxorubicin hydrochloride did not increase OS and DFS in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients.

Danggui Buxue Decoction, a Classical Formula of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fails to Prevent Myelosuppression in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study

Danggui Buxue Decoction (DBD), a classical formula of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has an impact on promoting hematopoiesis. The aim of our study was to determine whether DBD can prevent myelosuppression in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. We conducted a phase II randomized prospective controlled clinical study. From December 2013 to February 2015, 106 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to the TCM group and control group. The primary end point was incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia. The secondary end points included incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia in each cycle, incidence of anemia, and incidence of thrombopenia during 4 cycles. Seventeen patients withdrew from this study, and 89 patients were included in the final analysis. Incidences of grade 3-4 neutropenia during 4 cycles were 57.1% in the TCM group and 59.6% in the control group, and there was no significant difference ( P = .816). Similarly, no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia in each cycle. While incidences of anemia were 54.8% and 66.6% for the TCM group and control group, respectively ( P = .280), incidences of thrombopenia were 11.9% for the TCM group and 4.3% for the control group ( P = .248). No significant differences were observed for the incidence of other nonhematological toxicities between the 2 groups. DBD failed to prevent myelosuppression in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies are warranted to validate the efficacy of DBD in selected patients.

Non-anthracycline-containing docetaxel and cyclophosphamide regimen is associated with sustained worse outcome compared with docetaxel, anthracycline and cyclophosphamide in neoadjuvant treatment of triple negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients: updated follow-up data from NATT study

Objective

A previous study demonstrated that non-anthracycline-containing docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (TC) regimen was inferior to docetaxel, anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (TAC) in neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-(HER2)-positive breast cancer in a short-term follow-up. Herein, long-term follow-up survival outcomes have been investigated.

Methods

TNBC or HER2-positive patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of TC or TAC neoadjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint was pathological complete remission (pCR). Secondary endpoints included clinical response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

A cohort of 96 patients consisted of 45 in TC and 51 in TAC arm. With a median follow-up period of 53 (range, 8–76) months, the patients achieving pCR post neoadjuvant chemotherapy exhibited superior EFS and OS than patients without pCR (P<0.05). TAC treatment resulted in consistently better EFS than TC treatment: the estimated 5-year EFS was 66.1% vs. 29.8% (P=0.002). Moreover, the estimated 5-year OS was also in favor of TAC: 88.4% vs. 51.6% (P<0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the treatment regimen was an independent prognostic factor, and patients treated with TAC had a superior EFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.48; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.26–0.90; P=0.021] and OS (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08–0.60; P=0.003).

Conclusions

The updated long-term follow-up data demonstrated a sustained benefit in EFS and OS from anthracycline-containing TAC treatment, indicating that anthracycline is an essential and effective drug in this clinical trial.

Protective effect of astragalus polysaccharides on liver injury induced by several different chemotherapeutics in mice

Side effects are an unavoidable consequence of chemotherapy drugs, during which liver injury often takes place. The current study was designed to investigate the protective effect of Astragalus polysaccharides (APS) against the hepatotoxicity induced by frequently-used chemical therapy agents, cyclophosphamide (CTX), docetaxel (DTX) and epirubicin (EPI)) in mice. Mice were divided into five groups, controls, low or high dose groups (DTXL, CTXL, EPIL or DTXH, CTXH, EPIH), and low or high dose chemotherapeutics+APS groups (DTXL+APS, CTXL+APS, EPIL+APS or DTXH+APS, CTXH+APS, EPIH+APS). Controls were treated with equivalent normal saline for 28 days every other day; low or high dose group were intraperitoneal (i.p) injected with low or high doses of CTX, DTX and EPI for 28 days every other day; low or high dose chemotherapeutics+APS group were separately intraperitoneal (i.p) injected with chemotherapeutics for 28 days every other day and i.p with APS (100 mg/kg) for 7 days continually from the 22th to the 28th days. The body weight, serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), histopathological features, and ultrastructure morphological change of liver tissues, protein expression level of caspase-3 were estimated at different time points. With high dose treatment of DTX, CTX and EPI, weight gain was inhibited and serum levels of ALT and AST were significantly increased. Sections of liver tissue showed massive hepatotoxicity in CTXH group compared to the control group, including hepatic lobule disorder, granular and vacuolar degeneration and necrosis in hepatic cells. These changes were confirmed at ultrastructural level, including obvious pyknosis, heterochromatin aggregation, nuclear membrane resolution, and chondrosome crystal decrease. Western blotting revealed that the protein levels of caspase-3 increased in CTXH group. The low dose groups exhibited trivial hepatotoxicity. More interestingly, after 100 mg/kg APS, liver injury was redecued not only regarding serum transaminase activities (low or high dose chemotherapeutics+APS group), but also from pathological and ultrastructural changes and the protein levels of caspase-3 (CTXH+APS group). In conclusion, DTX, CTX and EPI induce liver damage in a dose dependent manner, whereas APS exerted protective effects.

Review on the Applications and Molecular Mechanisms of Xihuang Pill in Tumor Treatment

Xihuang pill (XH) is a complementary and alternative medicine that has been used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for the treatment of tumors since the 18th century. XH has clinical effects on non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast cancer, gastric cancer, liver cancer, and bone metastasis. XH can also inhibit the growth of tumor cells and cancer stem cells, prevent tumor invasion and angiogenesis, and regulate the tumor microenvironment. XH is composed of Ru Xiang (olibanum), Mo Yao (Commiphora myrrha), She Xiang (Moschus), and Niu Huang (Calculus bovis). Some of the compounds found in these ingredients exert multiple antitumor effects and may synergize with the other ingredients. We aimed to summarize the clinical applications and molecular mechanisms of XH and its chemical composition. This review will provide potential new strategies and alternative perspectives for tumor treatments and basic research into complementary and alternative medicine.

Knockdown of UbcH10 enhances the chemosensitivity of dual drug resistant breast cancer cells to epirubicin and docetaxel

Breast cancer is one of the most common and lethal cancers in women. As a hub gene involved in a diversity of tumors, the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme H10 (UbcH10), may also play some roles in the genesis and development of breast cancer. In the current study, we found that the expression of UbcH10 was up-regulated in some breast cancer tissues and five cell lines. We established a dual drug resistant cell line MCF-7/EPB (epirubicin)/TXT (docetaxel) and a lentiviral system expressing UbcH10 shRNA to investigate the effects of UbcH10 knockdown on the chemosensitivity of MCF-7/EPB/TXT cells to epirubicin and docetaxel. The knockdown of UbcH10 inhibited the proliferation of both MCF-7 and MCF-7/EPB/TXT cells, due to the G1 phase arrest in cell cycle. Furthermore, UbcH10 knockdown increased the sensitivity of MCF-7/EPB/TXT cells to epirubicin and docetaxel and promoted the apoptosis induced by these two drugs. Protein detection showed that, in addition to inhibiting the expression of Ki67 and cyclin D1, UbcH10 RNAi also impaired the increased BCL-2 and MDR-1 expression levels in MCF-7/EPB/TXT cells, which may contribute to abating the drug resistance in the breast cancer cells. Our research in the current study demonstrated that up-regulation of UbcH10 was involved in breast cancer and its knockdown can inhibit the growth of cancer cells and increase the chemosensitivity of the dual drug resistant breast cancer cells to epirubicin and docetaxel, suggesting that UbcH10 may be a promising target for the therapy of breast cancer.

Anthracycline-free neoadjuvant therapy induces pathological complete responses by exploiting immune proficiency in HER2+ breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NC) including trastuzumab induces a high rate of pathological Complete Responses (pCR) in patients with locally advanced HER2-overexpressing Breast Cancer (BC), but is penalized by a severe cardiotoxicity when combined with anthracyclines. A phase II study was designed to assess whether an anthracycline-free NC regimen based on the early addition of trastuzumab to paclitaxel may increase the pCR rate without inducing severe cardiotoxicity in patients with locally advanced HER2-overexpressing BC. Immunomonitoring was performed to assess the contribution of patients' immunological background to the induction of clinical responses.

METHODS

Stage II-III HER2-positive BC patients received 24 weeks paclitaxel and trastuzumab NC, followed by 1 year adjuvant trastuzumab ± hormonal and/or radio-therapy. Assessment of pCR rate was the primary endpoint. A group of HER2-negative BC patients treated with neoadjuvant taxanes and anthracyclines was included. Serum levels of 10 cytokines and the efficiency of trastuzumab-mediated antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) were monitored in vitro every 3 months.

RESULTS

From July 2006 to February 2013, we enrolled 109 patients including 46 evaluable HER2-positive cases. A pCR rate of 50% was reached and no severe cardiotoxicity occurred. Serum cytokine profiling revealed only an IL-10 decrease (P = 0.02) in patients achieving a partial response, while HER2-negative patients disclosed marked cytokines changes. Compared to the unfavourable F/F genotype, patients carrying the V allele in the FcγRIIIa-158 polymorphism showed a higher efficacy of trastuzumab-ADCC throughout treatment (P ≤0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of anthracyclines, trastuzumab and paclitaxel induced a high rate of pCR, exploiting the synergy between the immunomodulating properties of these drugs and the retained immunological proficiency of patients with HER2-overexpressing BC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number: NCT02307227, registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, November 26, 2014).

Efficacy of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with TEC regimen on breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with TEC regimen (taxotere-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide) in the treatment of breast cancer (BC) patients.

METHOD

Total of 118 BC patients were recruited from the Department of Breast Surgery in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012, in this study. The clinical data and serum samples were collected from each patient prior to the study. All patients were given four cycles of TEC chemotherapy before surgery.

RESULTS

The overall response rate of TEC regimen in the treatment of BC was 67.8% (80/118), clinical complete response rate was 3.4% (4/118), and clinical partial response rate was 64.4% (76/118). Furthermore, we found that age, tumor size, lymph node metastasis and clinical stages of patients had no statistically significant difference (all P > 0.05). Both negative ER status and negative PR status were statistically related to better response (P = 0.033 and P = 0.024, respectively) when compared with the positive ER status and positive PR status, while such association was not observed between the negative HER-2 status and positive HER-2 status (P > 0.05). In addition, the efficacy of triple-negative breast cancer was significantly better than that of luminal A, luminal B and HER-2+ cancers (all P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference among the HER-2+, luminal A, luminal B groups (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study support the view that BC cases under the TEC chemotherapy were related to higher overall response rates; and the chemotherapy with the TEC regimen could be served as an effective therapy in the treatment of BC.