1
|
El Gazzar WB, Albakri KA, Hasan H, Badr AM, Farag AA, Saleh OM. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in the treatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Oncol Pharm Pract 2023; 29:1467-1479. [PMID: 37559370 DOI: 10.1177/10781552231188903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chemotherapy is the mainstay for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Over the years, the use of chemotherapy for these patients has demonstrated many adversities, including toxicity and resistance, which suggested the need to develop novel alternative therapeutic options, such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Herein, we provide an overview on PARPi, mechanisms of action and the role of biomarkers in PARPi sensitivity trials, clinical advances in PARPi therapy for TNBC patients based on the most recent studies and findings of clinical trials, and challenges that prevent PARP inhibitors from achieving high efficacy such as resistance and overlapping toxicities with other chemotherapies. DATA SOURCES Searching for relevant articles was done using PubMed and Cochrane Library databases by using the keywords including TNBC; chemotherapy; PARPi; BRCA; homologous recombination repair (HRR). Studies had to be published in full-text in English in order to be considered. DATA SUMMARY Although PARPi have been used in the treatment of local/metastatic breast malignancies that are HER2 negative and has a germline BRCA mutation, several questions are still to be answered in order to maximize the clinical benefit of PARP inhibitors in TNBC treatment, such as questions related to the optimal use in the neoadjuvant and metastatic settings as well as the best combinations with various chemotherapies. CONCLUSIONS PARPi are emerging treatment options for patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations. Determining patients that are most likely to benefit from PARPi and identifying the optimal treatment combinations with high efficacy and fewer side effects are currently ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walaa Bayoumie El Gazzar
- Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha City, Egypt
| | | | - Hanan Hasan
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Amira M Badr
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amina A Farag
- Department of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha City, Egypt
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khan IM, Khan SU, Sala HSS, Khan MU, Ud Din MA, Khan S, Hassan SSU, Khan NM, Liu Y. TME-targeted approaches of brain metastases and its clinical therapeutic evidence. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1131874. [PMID: 37228619 PMCID: PMC10204080 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1131874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment (TME), which includes both cellular and non-cellular elements, is now recognized as one of the major regulators of the development of primary tumors, the metastasis of which occurs to specific organs, and the response to therapy. Development of immunotherapy and targeted therapies have increased knowledge of cancer-related inflammation Since the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCB) limit immune cells from entering from the periphery, it has long been considered an immunological refuge. Thus, tumor cells that make their way "to the brain were believed to be protected from the body's normal mechanisms of monitoring and eliminating them. In this process, the microenvironment and tumor cells at different stages interact and depend on each other to form the basis of the evolution of tumor brain metastases. This paper focuses on the pathogenesis, microenvironmental changes, and new treatment methods of different types of brain metastases. Through the systematic review and summary from macro to micro, the occurrence and development rules and key driving factors of the disease are revealed, and the clinical precision medicine of brain metastases is comprehensively promoted. Recent research has shed light on the potential of TME-targeted and potential treatments for treating Brain metastases, and we'll use that knowledge to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrar Muhammad Khan
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Embryo Development and Reproduction Regulation, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Hormone and Reproduction, School of Biological and Food Engineering, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang, China
| | - Safir Ullah Khan
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Hari Siva Sai Sala
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Embryo Development and Reproduction Regulation, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Hormone and Reproduction, School of Biological and Food Engineering, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang, China
| | - Munir Ullah Khan
- MOE Key Laboratory of Macromolecular Synthesis and Functionalization, International Research Center for X Polymers, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | | | - Samiullah Khan
- Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pests, Guiyang, Ministry of Agricultural and Affairs, Guiyang, China
| | - Syed Shams ul Hassan
- Department of Natural Product Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nazir Muhammad Khan
- Department of Zoology, University of Science and Technology, Bannu, Pakistan
| | - Yong Liu
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Embryo Development and Reproduction Regulation, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Hormone and Reproduction, School of Biological and Food Engineering, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Q, Xiong J, Ma Y, Wei J, Liu C, Zhao Y. Systemic treatments for breast cancer brain metastasis. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1086821. [PMID: 36686840 PMCID: PMC9853531 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1086821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in females and BC brain metastasis (BCBM) is considered as the second most frequent brain metastasis. Although the advanced treatment has significantly prolonged the survival in BC patients, the prognosis of BCBM is still poor. The management of BCBM remains challenging. Systemic treatments are important to maintain control of central nervous system disease and improve patients' survival. BCBM medical treatment is a rapidly advancing area of research. With the emergence of new targeted drugs, more options are provided for the treatment of BM. This review features currently available BCBM treatment strategies and outlines novel drugs and ongoing clinical trials that may be available in the future. These treatment strategies are discovered to be more efficacious and potent, and present a paradigm shift in the management of BCBMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Cuiwei Liu
- *Correspondence: Cuiwei Liu, ; Yanxia Zhao,
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Singh K, Saxena S, Khosla AA, McDermott MW, Kotecha RR, Ahluwalia MS. Update on the Management of Brain Metastasis. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:1772-1781. [PMID: 36422836 PMCID: PMC9723062 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01312-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases occur in almost one-third of adult patients with solid tumor malignancies and lead to considerable patient morbidity and mortality. The rising incidence of brain metastases has been ascribed to the development of better imaging and screening techniques and the formulation of better systemic therapies. Until recently, the multimodal management of brain metastases focused primarily on the utilization of neurosurgical techniques, with varying combinations of whole-brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radio-surgical procedures. Over the past 2 decades, in particular, the increment in knowledge pertaining to molecular genetics and the pathogenesis of brain metastases has led to significant developments in targeted therapies and immunotherapies. This review article highlights the recent updates in the management of brain metastases with an emphasis on novel systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karanvir Singh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Shreya Saxena
- Division of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Atulya A Khosla
- Division of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Michael W McDermott
- Division of Neurosurgery, Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA
| | - Rupesh R Kotecha
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA.
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang M, Haiderali A, Fox GE, Frederickson A, Cortes J, Fasching PA, O'Shaughnessy J. Economic and Humanistic Burden of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:519-558. [PMID: 35112331 PMCID: PMC9095534 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01121-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 10-20% of all breast cancers (BCs). It is more commonly diagnosed in younger women and often has a less favorable prognosis compared with other BC subtypes. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to provide a literature-based extensive overview of the economic and humanistic burden of TNBC to assist medical decisions for healthcare payers, providers, and patients. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed using multiple databases, including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Econlit, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, from database inception to 16 May 2021. In addition, a targeted search was performed in the Northern Light Life Sciences Conference Abstracts database from 2016 through June 2021. The bibliographies of included articles were reviewed to identify other potentially relevant publications. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted. RESULTS The review identified 19 studies assessing the economic burden and 10 studies assessing the humanistic burden of TNBC. Studies varied widely in study design, settings, patient populations, and time horizons. The estimates of mean per-patient annual direct medical costs ranged from around $20,000 to over $100,000 in stage I-III TNBC and from $100,000 to $300,000 in stage IV TNBC. Healthcare costs and resource utilization increased significantly with disease recurrence, progression, and increased cancer stage or line of therapy. Compared with the costs of systemic anticancer therapy, cancer management costs comprised a larger portion of total direct costs. The estimates of indirect costs due to productivity loss ranged from $207 to $1573 per patient per month (all costs presented above were adjusted to 2021 US dollars). Cancer recurrence led to significantly reduced productivity and greater rates of leaving the workforce. A rapid deterioration of health utility associated with disease progression was observed in TNBC patients. Treatment with pembrolizumab or talazoparib showed significantly greater improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with chemotherapy, as measured by EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23, and FACT-B. CONCLUSION TNBC is associated with a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems and societies and considerably reduced productivity and HRQoL for patients. This study synthesized the published literature on the economic and humanistic burden of TNBC and highlighted the need for continued research due to the rapidly changing landscape of TNBC care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Huang
- Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Barcelona, Spain
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology and US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li AY, Gaebe K, Jerzak KJ, Cheema PK, Sahgal A, Das S. Intracranial Metastatic Disease: Present Challenges, Future Opportunities. Front Oncol 2022; 12:855182. [PMID: 35330715 PMCID: PMC8940535 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.855182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) is a prevalent complication of cancer that significantly limits patient survival and quality of life. Over the past half-century, our understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of IMD has improved and enabled the development of surveillance and treatment algorithms based on prognostic factors and tumor biomolecular characteristics. In addition to advances in surgical resection and radiation therapy, the treatment of IMD has evolved to include monoclonal antibodies and small molecule antagonists of tumor-promoting proteins or endogenous immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging as well as the development of new serological assays to detect brain metastases promise to revolutionize IMD diagnosis. In this review, we will explore current treatment principles in patients with IMD, including the emerging role of targeted and immunotherapy in select primary cancers, and discuss potential areas for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa Y Li
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karolina Gaebe
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Katarzyna J Jerzak
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Parneet K Cheema
- Division of Oncology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Salvage Treatment for Progressive Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041096. [PMID: 35205844 PMCID: PMC8870695 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Thirty percent of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, and 15% of patients with the remaining subtypes of breast cancer will develop brain metastases. Available treatment methods include surgery and radiotherapy. However, some individuals will experience intracranial progression despite prior local treatment. This situation remains a challenge. In the case of progressing lesions amenable to local therapy, the choice of a treatment method must consider performance status, cancer burden, possible toxicity, and previously applied therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy rather than whole-brain radiotherapy should be used only if feasible. If local therapy is unfeasible, selected patients, especially those with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, may benefit from systemic therapy. Abstract Survival of patients with breast cancer has increased in recent years due to the improvement of systemic treatment options. Nevertheless, the occurrence of brain metastases is associated with a poor prognosis. Moreover, most drugs do not penetrate the central nervous system because of the blood–brain barrier. Thus, confirmed intracranial progression after local therapy is especially challenging. The available methods of salvage treatment include surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), whole-brain radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. This narrative review discusses possible strategies of salvage treatment for progressive brain metastases in breast cancer. It covers possibilities of repeated local treatment using the same method as applied previously, other methods of local therapy, and options of salvage systemic treatment. Repeated local therapy may provide a significant benefit in intracranial progression-free survival and overall survival. However, it could lead to significant toxicity. Thus, the choice of optimal methods should be carefully discussed within the multidisciplinary tumor board.
Collapse
|
8
|
Intracranial Response Rate in Patients with Breast Cancer Brain Metastases after Systemic Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040965. [PMID: 35205723 PMCID: PMC8869862 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary For many years, patients with breast cancer and brain metastases were excluded from participation in clinical trials. It was believed that anticancer drugs could not cross the blood–brain barrier. However, recent evidence strongly suggests that some drugs can act against brain metastases, with the greatest intracranial response rate reported in the case of capecitabine, neratinib plus capecitabine, trastuzumab deruxtecan and tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine. In this article, we discuss the achievements in systemic therapy of breast cancer patients with brain metastases. We stress on the newest clinical trial results which indicate tremendous progress in HER2-positive breast cancer. On the other hand, in patients with triple-negative breast cancer or hormone-receptor-positive brain metastases, much fewer compounds were discovered. Based on the presented results, patients with active brain metastases should be routinely included in clinical trials with novel agents. Abstract Brain metastases are detected in 5% of patients with breast cancer at diagnosis. The rate of brain metastases is higher in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer patients (TNBC). In patients with metastatic breast cancer, the risk of brain metastases is much higher, with up to 50% of the patients having two aggressive biological breast cancer subtypes. The prognosis for such patients is poor. Until recently, little was known about the response to systemic therapy in brain metastases. The number of trials dedicated to breast cancer with brain metastases was scarce. Our review summarizes the current knowledge on this topic including very significant results of clinical trials which have been presented very recently. We focus on the intracranial response rate of modern drugs, including new antibody–drug conjugates, HER2- targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies. We highlight the most effective and promising drugs. On the other hand, we also suggest that further efforts are needed to improve the prognosis, especially patients with TNBC and brain metastases. The information contained in this article can help oncologists make treatment-related decisions.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kadamkulam Syriac A, Nandu NS, Leone JP. Central Nervous System Metastases from Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Prospective. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2022; 14:1-13. [PMID: 35046721 PMCID: PMC8760391 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s274514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
It is estimated that approximately one-third of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) will develop brain metastases. The prognosis for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis has improved in the recent past, especially for hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER) positive subtypes. However, the overall survival rate for patients with triple-negative subtype remains poor. The development of newer treatment options, including antibody-drug conjugates such as Sacituzumab govitecan, is particularly encouraging. This article reviews the clinical outcomes, challenges, and current approach to the treatment of brain metastasis in TNBC. We have also briefly discussed newer treatment options and ongoing clinical trials. The development of brain metastasis significantly decreases the quality of life of patients with TNBC, and newer treatment strategies and therapeutics are the need of the hour for this disease subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nitish Singh Nandu
- Department of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/ Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jose Pablo Leone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Triple-negative breast cancer brain metastasis: an update on druggable targets, current clinical trials, and future treatment options. Drug Discov Today 2022; 27:1298-1314. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
11
|
Current Advancements of Plant-Derived Agents for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy through Deregulating Cancer Cell Functions and Reprogramming Tumor Microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms222413571. [PMID: 34948368 PMCID: PMC8703661 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined based on the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptors. Currently, chemotherapy is the major therapeutic approach for TNBC patients; however, poor prognosis after a standard chemotherapy regimen is still commonplace due to drug resistance. Abnormal tumor metabolism and infiltrated immune or stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) may orchestrate mammary tumor growth and metastasis or give rise to new subsets of cancer cells resistant to drug treatment. The immunosuppressive mechanisms established in the TME make cancer cell clones invulnerable to immune recognition and killing, and turn immune cells into tumor-supporting cells, hence allowing cancer growth and dissemination. Phytochemicals with the potential to change the tumor metabolism or reprogram the TME may provide opportunities to suppress cancer metastasis and/or overcome chemoresistance. Furthermore, phytochemical intervention that reprograms the TME away from favoring immunoevasion and instead towards immunosurveillance may prevent TNBC metastasis and help improve the efficacy of combination therapies as phyto-adjuvants to combat drug-resistant TNBC. In this review, we summarize current findings on selected bioactive plant-derived natural products in preclinical mouse models and/or clinical trials with focus on their immunomodulatory mechanisms in the TME and their roles in regulating tumor metabolism for TNBC prevention or therapy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Suo J, Zhong X, He P, Zheng H, Tian T, Yan X, Luo T. A Retrospective Analysis of the Effect of Irinotecan-Based Regimens in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracyclines and Taxanes. Front Oncol 2021; 11:654974. [PMID: 34881172 PMCID: PMC8645637 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.654974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background At present, patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have few treatment options after receiving anthracyclines and taxanes. Studies have shown that irinotecan has modest systemic activity in some patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy for breast cancer patients in a metastatic setting. Methods We retrospectively collected the clinical information and survival data of 51 patients with MBC who received irinotecan at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The primary endpoints were the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). To minimize potential confounding factors, we matched 51 patients who received third-line chemotherapy without irinotecan through propensity score matching (PSM) based on age, hormone receptor (HR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), compared their OS and PFS rates to those treated with irinotecan. Results From July 2012 to October 2020, 51 patients were treated with an irinotecan-containing regimen. The median number of previous treatment lines was 4, and a median of two previous chemotherapy cycles (ranging from 1–14 cycles) were given in a salvage line setting. The ORR was 15.7%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 37.3%. For the irinotecan group, the median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI 2.7–3.7), while the median OS was 33.1 months (95% CI 27.9–38.3). Univariate analysis results suggested that irinotecan could improve PFS in patients with visceral metastasis (P=0.031), which was 0.7 months longer than patients without visceral metastasis (3.5 months vs. 2.8 months). Compared to the patients who received third-line non-irinotecan chemotherapy, the irinotecan group showed a longer trend of PFS without statistical significance (3.2 months vs 2.1 months, P = 0.052). Similarly, the OS of the irinotecan group was longer than the third-line survival without irinotecan, but it was not statistically significant (33.1 months vs 18.0 months, P = 0.072). Conclusions For MBC patients who were previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes, an irinotecan-containing regimen achieved moderate objective response and showed a trend of survival benefit, which deserves further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaojiao Suo
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaorong Zhong
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ping He
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Zheng
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tinglun Tian
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xi Yan
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ting Luo
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sammons S, Van Swearingen AED, Chung C, Anders CK. Advances in the management of breast cancer brain metastases. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:v63-v74. [PMID: 34859234 PMCID: PMC8633750 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of breast cancer (BC) brain metastases (BrM) is a common complication of advanced disease, occurring in up to half of the patients with advanced disease depending on the subtype. The management of BCBrM requires complex multidisciplinary care including local therapy, surgical resection and/or radiotherapy, palliative care, and carefully selected systemic therapies. Significant progress has been made in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) BCBrM population due to novel brain penetrable systemic therapies. Increased inclusion of patients with BCBrM in clinical trials using brain-penetrant systemic therapies recently led to the first FDA approval of a HER2-directed therapy specifically in the BCBrM population in the last year. Advances for the treatment of HR+/HER2- and TNBC BCBrM subgroups continue to evolve. In this review, we will discuss the diagnosis and multidisciplinary care of BCBrM. We focus on recent advances in neurosurgery, radiation therapy, and systemic treatment therapies with intracranial activity. We also provide an overview of the current clinical trial landscape for patients with BCBrM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Sammons
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carey K Anders
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Das A, Agarwal P, Jain GK, Aggarwal G, Lather V, Pandita D. Repurposing drugs as novel triple negative breast cancer therapeutics. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2021; 22:515-550. [PMID: 34674627 DOI: 10.2174/1871520621666211021143255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among all the types of breast cancer (BC), triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive form having high metastasis and recurrence rate with limited treatment options. Conventional treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy have lots of toxic side effects and also no FDA approved therapies are available till now. Repurposing of old clinically approved drugs towards various targets of TNBC is the new approach with lesser side effects and also leads to successful inexpensive drug development with less time consuming. Medicinal plants containg various phytoconstituents (flavonoids, alkaloids, phenols, essential oils, tanins, glycosides, lactones) plays very crucial role in combating various types of diseases and used in drug development process because of having lesser side effects. OBJECTIVE The present review focuses in summarization of various categories of repurposed drugs against multitarget of TNBC and also summarizes the phytochemical categories that targets TNBC singly or in combination with synthetic old drugs. METHODS Literature information was collected from various databases such as Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus and Medline to understand and clarify the role and mechanism of repurposed synthetic drugs and phytoconstituents aginst TNBC by using keywords like "breast cancer", "repurposed drugs", "TNBC" and "phytoconstituents". RESULTS Various repurposed drugs and phytochemicals targeting different signaling pathways that exerts their cytotoxic activities on TNBC cells ultimately leads to apoptosis of cells and also lowers the recurrence rate and stops the metastasis process. CONCLUSION Inhibitory effects seen in different levels, which provides information and evidences to researchers towards drug developments process and thus further more investigations and researches need to be taken to get the better therapeutic treatment options against TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amiya Das
- Amity Institute of Molecular Medicine & Stem Cell Research (AIMMSCR), Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida, 201313. India
| | - Pallavi Agarwal
- Amity Institute of Molecular Medicine & Stem Cell Research (AIMMSCR), Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida, 201313. India
| | - Gaurav Kumar Jain
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Research, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, Pushp Vihar, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi, 110017. India
| | - Geeta Aggarwal
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Research, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, Pushp Vihar, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi, 110017. India
| | - Viney Lather
- Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida, 201313. India
| | - Deepti Pandita
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Research, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, Pushp Vihar, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi, 110017. India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Joe NS, Hodgdon C, Kraemer L, Redmond KJ, Stearns V, Gilkes DM. A common goal to CARE: Cancer Advocates, Researchers, and Clinicians Explore current treatments and clinical trials for breast cancer brain metastases. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:121. [PMID: 34521857 PMCID: PMC8440644 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00326-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Approximately one-tenth of all patients with advanced breast cancer develop brain metastases resulting in an overall survival rate of fewer than 2 years. The challenges lie in developing new approaches to treat, monitor, and prevent breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM). This review will provide an overview of BCBM from the integrated perspective of clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. We will summarize the current management of BCBM, including diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. We will highlight ongoing translational research for BCBM, including clinical trials and improved detection methods that can become the mainstay for BCBM treatment if they demonstrate efficacy. We will discuss preclinical BCBM research that focuses on the intrinsic properties of breast cancer cells and the influence of the brain microenvironment. Finally, we will spotlight emerging studies and future research needs to improve survival outcomes and preserve the quality of life for patients with BCBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie S Joe
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cellular and Molecular Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christine Hodgdon
- INSPIRE (Influencing Science through Patient-Informed Research & Education) Advocacy Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vered Stearns
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- INSPIRE (Influencing Science through Patient-Informed Research & Education) Advocacy Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniele M Gilkes
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Cellular and Molecular Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- INSPIRE (Influencing Science through Patient-Informed Research & Education) Advocacy Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pellerino A, Brastianos PK, Rudà R, Soffietti R. Leptomeningeal Metastases from Solid Tumors: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Molecular Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2888. [PMID: 34207653 PMCID: PMC8227730 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid tumors represent an unmet need of increasing importance due to an early use of MRI for diagnosis and improvement of outcome of some molecular subgroups following targeted agents and immunotherapy. In this review, we first discussed factors limiting the efficacy of targeted agents in LM, such as the molecular divergence between primary tumors and CNS lesions and CNS barriers at the level of the normal brain, brain tumors and CSF. Further, we reviewed pathogenesis and experimental models and modalities, such as MRI (with RANO and ESO/ESMO criteria), CSF cytology and liquid biopsy, to improve diagnosis and monitoring following therapy. Efficacy and limitations of targeted therapies for LM from EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged NSCLC, HER2-positive breast cancer and BRAF-mutated melanomas are reported, including the use of intrathecal administration or modification of traditional cytotoxic compounds. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in LM from non-druggable tumors, in particular triple-negative breast cancer, is discussed. Last, we focused on some recent techniques to improve drug delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pellerino
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (R.R.); (R.S.)
| | - Priscilla K. Brastianos
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (R.R.); (R.S.)
- Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto and Brain Tumor Board Treviso Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (R.R.); (R.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Oh SY, Rahman S, Sparano JA. Perspectives on PARP inhibitors as pharmacotherapeutic strategies for breast cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22:981-1003. [PMID: 33646064 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1876662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Approximately 10% of all breast cancer cases occur in individuals who have germline pathogenic variants of the BRCA 1, BRCA 2, and other genes associated with impaired DNA damage repair that is associated with an increased risk of breast, ovarian, and other cancers. Inhibitors of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) induce synthetic lethality in cancer cells harboring such pathogenic variants.Area covered In this review, the authors review the mechanisms of action, antitumor activity, and adverse events associated with PARP inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. The authors then summarize the area and provide their expert perspectives on the area.Expert opinion Two PARP inhibitors are approved in metastatic breast cancer, including olaparib and talozaparib. Both agents were approved based on phase III trials demonstrating that they were associated with improved progression-free survival compared with treatment of physician's choice in patients receiving second-third line therapy for locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic breast cancer in patients with germline pathogenic BRCA 1 or BRCA2 variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Young Oh
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Montefiore-Einstein center for cancer care, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Shafia Rahman
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Montefiore-Einstein center for cancer care, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Joseph A Sparano
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Montefiore-Einstein center for cancer care, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang Z, Song J, Xie C, Pan J, Lu W, Liu M. Pancreatic Cancer: Recent Progress of Drugs in Clinical Trials. AAPS JOURNAL 2021; 23:29. [PMID: 33580411 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-021-00556-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor and one of the primary causes of cancer-related death. Because pancreatic cancer is difficult to diagnose in the early course of the disease, most patients present with advanced lesions at the time of diagnosis, and only 20% of patients are eligible for surgery. Consequently, drug treatment has become extremely important. At present, the main treatment regimens for pancreatic cancer are gemcitabine and the FORFIRINOX and MPACT regimens. However, none of these regimens substantially improves the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. Extensive efforts have been dedicated to the study of pancreatic cancer in recent years. With the development and clinical application of biological targeted drugs, the biological targeted treatment of tumors has been widely accepted. Therefore, this article used relevant clinical trial data to summarize the research progress of traditional chemotherapy drugs and biological targeted drugs for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyi Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery, Ministry of Education, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, 826 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Song
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery, Ministry of Education, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, 826 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China
| | - Cao Xie
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery, Ministry of Education, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, 826 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Pan
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery, Ministry of Education, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, 826 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China
| | - Weiyue Lu
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery, Ministry of Education, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, 826 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Liu
- Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery, Ministry of Education, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, 826 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lv Y, Ma X, Du Y, Feng J. Understanding Patterns of Brain Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Exploring Potential Therapeutic Targets. Onco Targets Ther 2021; 14:589-607. [PMID: 33519208 PMCID: PMC7837592 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s293685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly malignant subtype of breast cancer. High invasiveness and heterogeneity, as well as a lack of drug targets, are the main factors leading to poor prognosis. Brain metastasis (BM) is a serious event threatening the life of breast cancer patients, especially those with TNBC. Compared with that for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive breast cancers, TNBC-derived BM (TNBCBM) occurs earlier and more frequently, and has a worse prognosis. There is no standard treatment for BM to date, and one is urgently required. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge regarding the developmental patterns of TNBCBM, focusing on the key events in BM formation. Specifically, we consider (i) the nature and function of TNBC cells; (ii) how TNBC cells cross the blood–brain barrier and form a fenestrated, more permeable blood–tumor barrier; (iii) the biological characteristics of TNBCBM; and (iv) the infiltration and colonization of the central nervous system (CNS) by TNBC cells, including the establishment of premetastatic niches, immunosurveillance escape, and metabolic adaptations. We also discuss putative therapeutic targets and precision therapy with the greatest potential to treat TNBCBM, and summarize the relevant completed and ongoing clinical trials. These findings may provide new insights into the prevention and treatment of BM in TNBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Lv
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing 210009, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao Ma
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuxin Du
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing 210009, People's Republic of China
| | - Jifeng Feng
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing 210009, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Leone JP, Emblem KE, Weitz M, Gelman RS, Schneider BP, Freedman RA, Younger J, Pinho MC, Sorensen AG, Gerstner ER, Harris G, Krop IE, Morganstern D, Sohl J, Hu J, Kasparian E, Winer EP, Lin NU. Phase II trial of carboplatin and bevacizumab in patients with breast cancer brain metastases. Breast Cancer Res 2020; 22:131. [PMID: 33256829 PMCID: PMC7706261 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01372-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab and carboplatin in patients with breast cancer brain metastases. METHODS We enrolled patients with breast cancer and > 1 measurable new or progressive brain metastasis. Patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously (IV) on cycle 1 day 1 and carboplatin IV AUC = 5 on cycle 1 day 8. Patients with HER2-positive disease also received trastuzumab. In subsequent cycles, all drugs were administered on day 1 of each cycle. Contrast-enhanced brain MRI was performed at baseline, 24-96 h after the first bevacizumab dose (day + 1), and every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate in the central nervous system (CNS ORR) by composite criteria. Associations between germline VEGF single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs699947, rs2019063, rs1570360, rs833061) and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were explored, as were associations between early (day + 1) MRI changes and outcomes. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were enrolled (29 HER2-positive, 9 HER2-negative); all were evaluable for response. The CNS ORR was 63% (95% CI, 46-78). Median PFS was 5.62 months and median OS was 14.10 months. As compared with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0, patients with ECOG PS 1-2 had significantly worse PFS and OS (all P < 0.01). No significant associations between VEGF genotypes or early MRI changes and clinical outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS The combination of bevacizumab and carboplatin results in a high rate of durable objective response in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer. This regimen warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01004172 . Registered 28 October 2009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Pablo Leone
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Kyrre E Emblem
- Department of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michelle Weitz
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Rebecca S Gelman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | - Rachel A Freedman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | - Marco C Pinho
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ian E Krop
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Daniel Morganstern
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jessica Sohl
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jiani Hu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Elizabeth Kasparian
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Seo MK, Paik S, Kim S. An Improved, Assay Platform Agnostic, Absolute Single Sample Breast Cancer Subtype Classifier. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3506. [PMID: 33255759 PMCID: PMC7761033 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
While intrinsic molecular subtypes provide important biological classification of breast cancer, the subtype assignment of individuals is influenced by assay technology and study cohort composition. We sought to develop a platform-independent absolute single-sample subtype classifier based on a minimal number of genes. Pairwise ratios for subtype-specific differentially expressed genes from un-normalized expression data from 432 breast cancer (BC) samples of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used as inputs for machine learning. The subtype classifier with the fewest number of genes and maximal classification power was selected during cross-validation. The final model was evaluated on 5816 samples from 10 independent studies profiled with four different assay platforms. Upon cross-validation within the TCGA cohort, a random forest classifier (MiniABS) with 11 genes achieved the best accuracy of 88.2%. Applying MiniABS to five validation sets of RNA-seq and microarray data showed an average accuracy of 85.15% (vs. 77.72% for Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtype (AIMS)). Only MiniABS could be applied to five low-throughput datasets, showing an average accuracy of 87.93%. The MiniABS can absolutely subtype BC using the raw expression levels of only 11 genes, regardless of assay platform, with higher accuracy than existing methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi-kyoung Seo
- Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea;
| | - Soonmyung Paik
- Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - Sangwoo Kim
- Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sachdev JC, Munster P, Northfelt DW, Han HS, Ma C, Maxwell F, Wang T, Belanger B, Zhang B, Moore Y, Thiagalingam A, Anders C. Phase I study of liposomal irinotecan in patients with metastatic breast cancer: findings from the expansion phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 185:759-771. [PMID: 33201358 PMCID: PMC7921078 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05995-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains incurable and is associated with low survival rates. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan in heavily pretreated patients with mBC, with or without active brain metastases (BM). Methods Following the dose escalation phase and determination of recommended phase 2 dose, the expansion phase of this phase I, open-label, non-randomized study, assigned adult women to cohorts based on mBC subtype: cohort 1, hormone receptor +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2−; cohort 2, triple-negative breast cancer; or cohort 3, any mBC subtype with active BM. Patients received liposomal irinotecan 50 or 70 mg/m2 free base every 2 weeks. Here, we report secondary outcomes including best overall response (BOR), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results For non-central nervous system (non-CNS) disease across all cohorts (intent-to-treat population, N = 29), the ORR was 34.5% (95% confidence interval: 17.94–54.33), with a BOR of partial response in 10 patients (34.5%), stable disease in five (17.2%), progressive disease in 10 (34.5%); four patients were unevaluable (13.8%). The ORR for the CNS cohort was 30.0% (95% confidence interval: 6.67–65.25) using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Common grade 3 or higher TEAEs were diarrhea (27.6%), nausea (17.2%), fatigue (13.8%), asthenia (10.3%), and hypokalemia (10.3%). Serious treatment-related TEAEs were reported in six patients (20.7%). No treatment-related TEAEs resulted in death. Conclusions Liposomal irinotecan monotherapy demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with mBC, with or without BM. The observed safety profile was consistent with that in previous studies. Clinical trial registration: Trial registration ID NCT01770353. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05995-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasgit C Sachdev
- HonorHealth Research Institute, 10510 N. 92nd Street, Suite 200, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258, USA. .,Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Cynthia Ma
- Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pellerino A, Internò V, Mo F, Franchino F, Soffietti R, Rudà R. Management of Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases from Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E8534. [PMID: 33198331 PMCID: PMC7698162 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved in the last 20 years. The improvement of systemic therapy allows a remarkable control of extracranial disease. However, brain (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are frequent complications of advanced BC and represent a challenging issue for clinicians. Some prognostic scales designed for metastatic BC have been employed to select fit patients for adequate therapy and enrollment in clinical trials. Different systemic drugs, such as targeted therapies with either monoclonal antibodies or small tyrosine kinase molecules, or modified chemotherapeutic agents are under investigation. Major aims are to improve the penetration of active drugs through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) or brain-tumor barrier (BTB), and establish the best sequence and timing of radiotherapy and systemic therapy to avoid neurocognitive impairment. Moreover, pharmacologic prevention is a new concept driven by the efficacy of targeted agents on macrometastases from specific molecular subgroups. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and molecular factors involved in the selection of patients for local and/or systemic therapy, as well as the results of clinical trials on advanced BC. Moreover, insight on promising therapeutic options and potential directions of future therapeutic targets against BBB and microenvironment are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pellerino
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (F.M.); (F.F.); (R.S.); (R.R.)
| | - Valeria Internò
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy;
| | - Francesca Mo
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (F.M.); (F.F.); (R.S.); (R.R.)
| | - Federica Franchino
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (F.M.); (F.F.); (R.S.); (R.R.)
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (F.M.); (F.F.); (R.S.); (R.R.)
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (F.M.); (F.F.); (R.S.); (R.R.)
- Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto and Treviso Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Soffietti R, Ahluwalia M, Lin N, Rudà R. Management of brain metastases according to molecular subtypes. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:557-574. [PMID: 32873927 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0391-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of brain metastases has markedly increased in the past 20 years owing to progress in the treatment of malignant solid tumours, earlier diagnosis by MRI and an ageing population. Although local therapies remain the mainstay of treatment for many patients with brain metastases, a growing number of systemic options are now available and/or are under active investigation. HER2-targeted therapies (lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib and trastuzumab emtansine), alone or in combination, yield a number of intracranial responses in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. New inhibitors are being investigated in brain metastases from ER-positive or triple-negative breast cancer. Several generations of EGFR and ALK inhibitors have shown activity on brain metastases from EGFR and ALK mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) hold promise in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer without druggable mutations and in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The survival of patients with brain metastases from melanoma has substantially improved after the advent of BRAF inhibitors and ICIs (ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab). The combination of targeted agents or ICIs with stereotactic radiosurgery could further improve the response rates and survival but the risk of radiation necrosis should be monitored. Advanced neuroimaging and liquid biopsy will hopefully improve response evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy.
| | - Manmeet Ahluwalia
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Center Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nancy Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lee KL, Chen G, Chen TY, Kuo YC, Su YK. Effects of Cancer Stem Cells in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Brain Metastasis: Challenges and Solutions. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082122. [PMID: 32751846 PMCID: PMC7463650 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A higher propensity of developing brain metastasis exists in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Upon comparing the metastatic patterns of all breast cancer subtypes, patients with TNBC exhibited increased risks of the brain being the initial metastatic site, early brain metastasis development, and shortest brain metastasis-related survival. Notably, the development of brain metastasis differs from that at other sites owing to the brain-unique microvasculature (blood brain barrier (BBB)) and intracerebral microenvironment. Studies of brain metastases from TNBC have revealed the poorest treatment response, mostly because of the relatively backward strategies to target vast disease heterogeneity and poor brain efficacy. Moreover, TNBC is highly associated with the existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which contribute to circulating cancer cell survival before BBB extravasation, evasion from immune surveillance, and plasticity in adaptation to the brain-specific microenvironment. We summarized recent literature regarding molecules and pathways and reviewed the effects of CSC biology during the formation of brain metastasis in TNBC. Along with the concept of individualized cancer therapy, certain strategies, namely the patient-derived xenograft model to overcome the lack of treatment-relevant TNBC classification and techniques in BBB disruption to enhance brain efficacy has been proposed in the hope of achieving treatment success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kha-Liang Lee
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Gao Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Yuan Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Che Kuo
- Taipei Medical University (TMU) Research Center for Cell Therapy and Regeneration Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan;
| | - Yu-Kai Su
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kim JS, Kim IA. Evolving treatment strategies of brain metastases from breast cancer: current status and future direction. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920936117. [PMID: 32636942 PMCID: PMC7313341 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920936117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Remarkable progress in breast cancer treatment has improved patient survival, resulting in an increased incidence of brain metastasis (BM). Current treatment options for BM are limited and are generally used for palliative purposes. Historically, local treatment, consisting of radiotherapy and surgery, is the standard of care due to delivery limitations of systemic treatments through the blood-brain barrier. However, as novel biological mechanisms for tumors and BM have been discovered, several innovative systemic agents, such as small-molecular-targeted therapy and immunotherapy, have begun to change the treatment paradigm. In addition, efforts to maximize antitumor effects have been attempted using combination therapy, informed by tumor biology. In this comprehensive review, we will highlight various clinical trials investigating the treatment of BM in breast cancer patients, discuss presently available treatment options, and suggest potential directions of future therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Sik Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In Ah Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gumi-ro 173, 82 Beon-gil, Bundang gu, Seongnam, 13620, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mei C, Lei L, Tan LM, Xu XJ, He BM, Luo C, Yin JY, Li X, Zhang W, Zhou HH, Liu ZQ. The role of single strand break repair pathways in cellular responses to camptothecin induced DNA damage. Biomed Pharmacother 2020; 125:109875. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
28
|
Pedrosa RMSM, Mustafa DA, Soffietti R, Kros JM. Breast cancer brain metastasis: molecular mechanisms and directions for treatment. Neuro Oncol 2019; 20:1439-1449. [PMID: 29566179 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of brain metastasis (BM) of breast cancer is usually a late event with deleterious effect on the prognosis. Treatment options for intracerebral seeding of breast cancer are limited and, so far, nonspecific. Molecular detailing of subsequent events of penetration, seeding, and outgrowth in brain is highly relevant for developing therapeutic strategies to treat, or prevent, BM.We scrutinize recent literature for molecules and pathways that are operative in the formation of breast cancer BM. We also summarize current data on therapeutic efforts to specifically address BM of breast cancer. Data on molecular pathways underlying the formation of BM of breast cancer are sketchy and to some extent inconsistent. The molecular makeup of BM differs from that of the primary tumors, as well as from metastases at other sites. Current efforts to treat breast cancer BM are limited, and drugs used have proven effects on the primary tumors but lack specificity for the intracerebral tumors.More basic research is necessary to better characterize BM of breast cancer. Apart from the identification of drug targets defined by the intracerebral tumors, also targets in the molecular pathways involved in passing the blood-brain barrier and intracerebral tumor cell growth should be revealed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rute M S M Pedrosa
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dana A Mustafa
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Johan M Kros
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kümler I, Balslev E, Stenvang J, Brünner N, Ejlertsen B, Jakobsen EH, Nielsen DL. Two open-label, single arm, non-randomized phase II studies of irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients with increased copy number of the topoisomerase I gene. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:573. [PMID: 31196001 PMCID: PMC6567440 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5788-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment options in metastatic breast cancer are limited. New therapies preferable with predictive biomarkers are needed. The aim of these trials was to investigate if gene copy number of the topoisomerase 1 gene was predictive of response to the topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan. Methods Two open-label, single-arm phase II studies including HER2 positive and negative patients were conducted. Patients were eligible for inclusion if the primary tumor or a metastatic lesion had increased expression of the topoisomerase 1 gene defined as a TOP1 gene copy number of ≥4 or a TOP1/CEN20 ratio of ≥2. Patients were treated with irinotecan +/− trastuzumab weekly for 4 weeks following 2 weeks break, until progression or unacceptable toxicities. Evaluation scans were performed every 6 weeks. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate defined as the fraction of patients with stable disease for ≥4 months. Results The pre-planned number of 18 patients in each trial was not reached, thus no formal statistical analysis could be performed. Nine patients with HER2 negative disease and three patients with HER2 positive disease were included. Three patients obtained a partial remission and two patients had SD. Conclusions The trials did not include the planned number of patients. No association between gene copy number of the topoisomerase 1 gene and response to irinotecan could be proved, however a clinical benefit was found in 5/12 patients and in 2/3 patients with HER2 positive disease. This could call for further investigation of the drug in the metastatic setting, especially in HER2 positive BC. Trial registration Eudract registration numbers 2012–002348-26 and 2012–002347-23. Registration date August 20th 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iben Kümler
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Eva Balslev
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jan Stenvang
- Institut for Lægemiddeldesign og Farmakologi, Jagtvej 160, 2100, København Ø, Denmark
| | - Nils Brünner
- Institut for Lægemiddeldesign og Farmakologi, Jagtvej 160, 2100, København Ø, Denmark
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Dorte Lisbet Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Phase II study of irinotecan and temozolomide in breast cancer patients with progressing central nervous system disease. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 177:401-408. [PMID: 31172405 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05309-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer patients with progressing central nervous system (CNS) disease have limited treatment options. Few chemotherapy drugs with activity in breast cancer have well-documented CNS penetration. This phase 2 trial evaluated efficacy and safety of irinotecan 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 with temozolomide 100 mg/m2 days 1-7 and days 15-21 of a 28 day cycle. METHODS Breast cancer patients of any biological subtype and progressing brain metastases and/or leptomeningeal disease (LMD) were eligible. The primary endpoint was CNS response rate. Secondary endpoints were clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Imaging studies evaluating intracranial and extracranial response were performed every 8 weeks. RESULTS Thirty patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. The most common hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events were neutropenia, and nausea and fatigue, respectively. There were two confirmed CNS partial responses (PR) and five patients with stable disease in the CNS ≥ 16 weeks, resulting in a 7% PR and 23% CBR. Median TTP was 2.3 months (range 13-444 days), and median OS from treatment initiation until death was 4.9 months (range 20-1023 days). Excluding patients with LMD, median TTP and OS were 3.1 and 5.6 months, respectively. Only one patient progressed systemically before CNS progression. CONCLUSIONS The combination of irinotecan and temozolomide was well tolerated, demonstrated some clinical activity across multiple breast cancer subtypes with progressing CNS disease, and offers a reasonable option for patients who are not candidates for further radiation or clinical trials.
Collapse
|
31
|
Tripathy D, Tolaney SM, Seidman AD, Anders CK, Ibrahim N, Rugo HS, Twelves C, Dieras V, Müller V, Tagliaferri M, Hannah AL, Cortés J. ATTAIN: Phase III study of etirinotecan pegol versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases. Future Oncol 2019; 15:2211-2225. [PMID: 31074641 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2019-0180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The increasing incidence of breast cancer brain metastases is a major clinical problem with its associated poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The long-acting topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, etirinotecan pegol, was designed to preferentially accumulate in tumor tissue including brain metastases, providing sustained cytotoxic SN38 levels. Motivated by improved survival findings from subgroup analyses from the Phase III BEACON trial, this ongoing randomized, Phase III trial compares etirinotecan pegol to drugs commonly used for advanced breast cancer in patients with stable, treated breast cancer brain metastases who have been previously treated with an anthracycline, taxane and capecitabine. The primary end point is overall survival. Secondary end points include objective response rate, progression-free survival and time to CNS disease progression or recurrence in patients with/without CNS lesions present at study entry. Trial registration number: NCT02915744.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debu Tripathy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Center for Women's Cancers, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Andrew D Seidman
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Bobst International Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Carey K Anders
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Duke Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27710, USA
| | - Nuhad Ibrahim
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Chris Twelves
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology (LICAP), Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.,St James' University Hospital, Institute of Oncology, Leeds, LS9 7BE, UK
| | - Veronique Dieras
- Institut Curie, Oncological Medicine Department, 75248, Paris, France
| | - Volkmar Müller
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Javier Cortés
- IOB Institute of Oncology, Quironsalud Group, 28034 Madrid & 08023 Barcelona, Spain.,Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Breast Cancer and Melanoma Group, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Innovative Therapeutic Strategies for Effective Treatment of Brain Metastases. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20061280. [PMID: 30875730 PMCID: PMC6471202 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20061280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are the most prevalent of intracranial malignancies. They are associated with a very poor prognosis and near 100% mortality. This has been the case for decades, largely because we lack effective therapeutics to augment surgery and radiotherapy. Notwithstanding improvements in the precision and efficacy of these life-prolonging treatments, with no reliable options for adjunct systemic therapy, brain recurrences are virtually inevitable. The factors limiting intracranial efficacy of existing agents are both physiological and molecular in nature. For example, heterogeneous permeability, abnormal perfusion and high interstitial pressure oppose the conventional convective delivery of circulating drugs, thus new delivery strategies are needed to achieve uniform drug uptake at therapeutic concentrations. Brain metastases are also highly adapted to their microenvironment, with complex cross-talk between the tumor, the stroma and the neural compartments driving speciation and drug resistance. New strategies must account for resistance mechanisms that are frequently engaged in this milieu, such as HER3 and other receptor tyrosine kinases that become induced and activated in the brain microenvironment. Here, we discuss molecular and physiological factors that contribute to the recalcitrance of these tumors, and review emerging therapeutic strategies, including agents targeting the PI3K axis, immunotherapies, nanomedicines and MRI-guided focused ultrasound for externally controlling drug delivery.
Collapse
|
34
|
Shah N, Mohammad AS, Saralkar P, Sprowls SA, Vickers SD, John D, Tallman RM, Lucke-Wold BP, Jarrell KE, Pinti M, Nolan RL, Lockman PR. Investigational chemotherapy and novel pharmacokinetic mechanisms for the treatment of breast cancer brain metastases. Pharmacol Res 2018; 132:47-68. [PMID: 29604436 PMCID: PMC5997530 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
In women, breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis and second most common cause of cancer death. More than half of breast cancer patients will develop metastases to the bone, liver, lung, or brain. Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) confers a poor prognosis, as current therapeutic options of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy rarely significantly extend life and are considered palliative. Within the realm of chemotherapy, the last decade has seen an explosion of novel chemotherapeutics involving targeting agents and unique dosage forms. We provide a historical overview of BCBM chemotherapy, review the mechanisms of new agents such as poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinaseinhibitors, estrogen pathway antagonists for hormone-receptor positive BCBM; tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibodies, and conjugates for HER2+ BCBM; repurposed cytotoxic chemotherapy for triple negative BCBM; and the utilization of these new agents and formulations in ongoing clinical trials. The mechanisms of novel dosage formulations such as nanoparticles, liposomes, pegylation, the concepts of enhanced permeation and retention, and drugs utilizing these concepts involved in clinical trials are also discussed. These new treatments provide a promising outlook in the treatment of BCBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Shah
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Afroz S Mohammad
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Pushkar Saralkar
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Samuel A Sprowls
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Schuyler D Vickers
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Devin John
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Rachel M Tallman
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Brandon P Lucke-Wold
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Katherine E Jarrell
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Mark Pinti
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Richard L Nolan
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | - Paul R Lockman
- West Virginia University, Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nolan C, Deangelis LM. Overview of metastatic disease of the central nervous system. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2018; 149:3-23. [PMID: 29307359 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811161-1.00001-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In 2016, the American Society of Clinical Oncology reported that 1.7 million Americans were diagnosed with cancer; this number will rise to 2.3 million in the United States and 22 million worldwide in 2030. This rising need is being met by an explosion of new cancer therapies, including: immune checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell therapies, tumor vaccines, antiangiogenic therapies, and various targeted therapies. This armamentarium of targeted therapies has led to better systemic control of disease and longer patient overall survival (OS). The incidence of metastatic disease to the central nervous system (CNS) is rising as patients are living longer with these more effective systemic therapies. Prolonged OS allows increased time to develop CNS metastases. The CNS is also a sanctuary for metastatic tumor cells that are protected from full exposure to therapeutic concentrations of most anticancer agents by the blood-brain barrier, the tumor microenvironment, and immune system. In addition, CNS metastases often develop late in the course of the disease, so patients are frequently heavily pretreated, resulting in drug resistance. Although genomic profiling has led to more effective therapies for systemic disease, the same therapy may not be effective in treating CNS disease, not only due to failure of blood-brain barrier penetration, but from discordance between the molecular profile in systemic and CNS tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Nolan
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Lisa M Deangelis
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lin NU, Gaspar LE, Soffietti R. Breast Cancer in the Central Nervous System: Multidisciplinary Considerations and Management. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2017; 37:45-56. [PMID: 28561683 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_175338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the second most common primary tumor associated with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Patients with metastatic HER2-positive or triple-negative (estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, HER2-negative) breast cancer are at the highest risk of developing parenchymal brain metastases. Leptomeningeal disease is less frequent but is distributed across breast cancer subtypes, including lobular breast cancer. Initial treatment strategies can include surgery, radiation, intravenous or intrathecal chemotherapy, and/or targeted approaches. In this article, we review the epidemiology of breast cancer brain metastases, differences in clinical behavior and natural history by tumor subtype, and important considerations in the multidisciplinary treatment of these patients. We will highlight new findings that impact current standards of care, clinical controversies, and notable investigational approaches in clinical testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy U Lin
- From the Breast Oncology Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Laurie E Gaspar
- From the Breast Oncology Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- From the Breast Oncology Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chao YL, Anders CK. Systemic Therapy in the Setting of Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases in Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-017-0253-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
38
|
Guo J, Gong G, Zhang B. Screening and identification of potential biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer by integrated analysis. Oncol Rep 2017; 38:2219-2228. [PMID: 28849078 DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has attracted great attention due to its unique biology, poor prognosis, and aggressiveness. TNBC patients are more likely to suffer from metastasis. We screened and identified the TNBC-specific genes as potential biomarkers. A total of 167 breast cancer samples (45 TNBC and 122 non-TNBC) were used in the integrated analysis. Gene expression microarrays were used to screen the differentially expressed genes. We identified 65 core DEGs. According to the GO and KEGG analysis, the gene function enrichment in TNBC was revealed, such as basal cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, oocyte meiosis and choline metabolism in cancer pathways. Moreover, the PPI network reconstruction would benefit the screening of hubs. A RFS analysis of TNBC-specific genes was also conducted. RT-PCR was used to validate the expression pattern of hubs in TNBC. Finally, nine genes were identified and all of them were novel, specific and higher dysregulation expressed genes in TNBC. Such that, these genes will serve as potential biomarkers in TNBC and benefit further research in TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jilong Guo
- Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacology Institute, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao, Inner Mongolia 028000, P.R. China
| | - Guohua Gong
- Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacology Institute, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao, Inner Mongolia 028000, P.R. China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacology Institute, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao, Inner Mongolia 028000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
The role of BRCA status on prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:87151-87162. [PMID: 29152070 PMCID: PMC5675622 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Studies have showed that dysfunction in the breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) is associated with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); however, its effect on patient survival remains controversial. We investigated the distribution of BRCA1/2 mutations in unselected Chinese patients with TNBC and explored their roles in prognosis. Then a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the prognostic role of BRCA dysfunction, including BRCA1/2 germline/somatic mutations, BRCA1 promoter methylation, and low BRCA1 protein expression in TNBC patients. Pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated to determine the association between BRCA dysfunction and survival. Our results showed a high frequency of BRCA1/2 mutations, especially germline BRCA1 variants, were associated with bilateral breast cancer. Although no correlations were found between BRCA1/2 mutations and recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS). In the meta-analysis, patients with BRCA1 promoter methylation showed poor OS. However, there was a favorable impact on disease free survival (DFS) for TNBC patients with BRCA1 promoter methylation when received adjuvant-chemotherapy. In conclusion, BRCA1/2 mutations were associated with bilateral breast cancer and BRCA1 promoter methylation may have a prognostic effect on TNBC.
Collapse
|
40
|
Du Y, Yamaguchi H, Hsu JL, Hung MC. PARP inhibitors as precision medicine for cancer treatment. Natl Sci Rev 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwx027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractPersonalized or precision medicine is an emerging treatment approach tailored to individuals or certain groups of patients based on their unique characteristics. These types of therapies guided by biomarkers tend to be more effective than traditional approaches, especially in cancer. The inhibitor against poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), olaparib (Lynparza, AstraZeneca), which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014, demonstrated efficacy specifically for ovarian cancer patients harboring mutations in BRCA genes, which encode proteins in DNA double-strand break repairs. However, the response to PARP inhibitors has been less encouraging in other cancer types that also carry defects in the BRCA genes. Thus, furthering our understanding of the underlying mechanism of PARP inhibitors and resistance is critical to improve their efficacy. In this review, we summarize the results of preclinical studies and the clinical application of PARP inhibitors, and discuss the future direction of PARP inhibitors as a potential marker-guided personalized medicine for cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Du
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030
| | - Hirohito Yamaguchi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030
| | - Jennifer L. Hsu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402
- Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung 41354
| | - Mien-Chie Hung
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402
- Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung 41354
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Phillips C, Jeffree R, Khasraw M. Management of breast cancer brain metastases: A practical review. Breast 2017; 31:90-98. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Revised: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
42
|
Triple-negative breast cancer: advancements in characterization and treatment approach. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 28:59-69. [PMID: 26694831 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises 15-20% of all breast cancer and is defined by the lack of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and absence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplification. Compared with patients with hormone receptor positive or Her-2 positive breast cancer, patients with TNBC are more commonly young (age <50 years), African-American and have a higher incidence of BRCA1/2 mutations. The clinical course is frequently characterized by early relapse and poor overall survival. The TNBC phenotype is impervious to therapies commonly used in other breast cancer subtypes, including hormonal therapy and Her-2 receptor antagonism. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the only approved treatment. With its aggressive clinical course and paucity of effective treatment options, TNBC represents an unmet clinical need. This review will focus on updates of the biologic underpinnings of TNBC and the associated treatment advances. RECENT FINDINGS Numerous advancements have been made toward understanding the biologic framework of TNBC. Gene expression profiling has revealed six clinically relevant subsets of TNBC. Further study has demonstrated a portion of TNBC exhibits a strong immune gene signature. Lastly, it is now appreciated that a subgroup of sporadic TNBC shares biologic characteristics with BRCA1/2-mutated breast cancer, notably homologous repair deficiency. Recent studies focus on incorporation of platinum salts and new combinations of conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Targeted agents, including poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, antiangiogenic agents, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibitors, and androgen antagonist are also being evaluated. Most recently, checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated a modest degree of activity in a subset of TNBC. SUMMARY These discoveries are informing novel treatment paradigms and identification of correlative biomarkers in TNBC. Improved understanding of the biologic heterogeneity of TNBC is allowing for a more effective and individualized approach to treatment.
Collapse
|
43
|
Potential role of targeted therapies in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2016; 27:147-55. [PMID: 26682525 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer type that affects women and is the major cause of morbidity and mortality. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype and accounts for 10-20% of all breast cancer cases. TNBC is commonly characterized by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and the Her2/neu receptor and is usually diagnosed by immunohistochemistry. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene, as well as overexpression of oncogenic kinases, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, vascular endothelial growth factor-A, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)/IGF-1 receptor, and transforming growth factor-β1, have been found to be correlated with a higher risk of metastasis and poor overall survival in TNBC patients. The current review briefly discusses the various treatment options including chemotherapeutics and targeted therapies that are available currently for the therapy of TNBC patients and highlights their comparative benefits and disadvantages for clinical application.
Collapse
|
44
|
Chi M, Abraham J. Management of breast cancer brain metastases. BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT 2015. [DOI: 10.2217/bmt.15.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Chi
- Fellow in Hematology Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 2010 E 90th St, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Jame Abraham
- Director of Breast Oncology Program, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Professor of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Willett A, Wilkinson JB, Shah C, Mehta MP. Management of solitary and multiple brain metastases from breast cancer. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2015; 36:87-93. [PMID: 26157284 PMCID: PMC4477383 DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.158835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
As local and systemic control of breast cancer improves, metastasis to the brain remains a common event requiring a specialized management approach. Women diagnosed with breast cancer who develop brain metastases have superior overall survival compared to patients with other forms of metastatic carcinoma. This article summarizes some of the unique aspects of care for patients with breast cancer metastases to the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Addison Willett
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130, USA
| | - J Ben Wilkinson
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130, USA ; Willis-Knighton Health System, Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, USA
| | - Chirag Shah
- Summa Health System/ Northeast Ohio Medical University, Akron, Ohio 44304, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sistigu A, Manic G, Obrist F, Vitale I. Trial watch - inhibiting PARP enzymes for anticancer therapy. Mol Cell Oncol 2015; 3:e1053594. [PMID: 27308587 DOI: 10.1080/23723556.2015.1053594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2015] [Revised: 05/16/2015] [Accepted: 05/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) are a members of family of enzymes that catalyze poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) and/or mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation (MARylation), two post-translational protein modifications involved in crucial cellular processes including (but not limited to) the DNA damage response (DDR). PARP1, the most abundant family member, is a nuclear protein that is activated upon sensing distinct types of DNA damage and contributes to their resolution by PARylating multiple DDR players. Recent evidence suggests that, along with DDR, activated PARP1 mediates a series of prosurvival and proapoptotic processes aimed at preserving genomic stability. Despite this potential oncosuppressive role, upregulation and/or overactivation of PARP1 or other PARP enzymes has been reported in a variety of human neoplasms. Over the last few decades, several pharmacologic inhibitors of PARP1 and PARP2 have been assessed in preclinical and clinical studies showing potent antineoplastic activity, particularly against homologous recombination (HR)-deficient ovarian and breast cancers. In this Trial Watch, we describe the impact of PARP enzymes and PARylation in cancer, discuss the mechanism of cancer cell killing by PARP1 inactivation, and summarize the results of recent clinical studies aimed at evaluating the safety and therapeutic profile of PARP inhibitors in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gwenola Manic
- Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome, Italy
| | - Florine Obrist
- Université Paris-Sud/Paris XI, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM, UMRS1138, Paris, France; Equipe 11 labelisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Center de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Ilio Vitale
- Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Department of Biology, University of Rome "TorVergata", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Puhalla S, Elmquist W, Freyer D, Kleinberg L, Adkins C, Lockman P, McGregor J, Muldoon L, Nesbit G, Peereboom D, Smith Q, Walker S, Neuwelt E. Unsanctifying the sanctuary: challenges and opportunities with brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2015; 17:639-51. [PMID: 25846288 PMCID: PMC4482864 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2014] [Accepted: 01/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
While the use of targeted therapies, particularly radiosurgery, has broadened therapeutic options for CNS metastases, patients respond minimally and prognosis remains poor. The inability of many systemic chemotherapeutic agents to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has limited their use and allowed brain metastases to become a burgeoning clinical challenge. Adequate preclinical models that appropriately mimic the metastatic process, the BBB, and blood-tumor barriers (BTB) are needed to better evaluate therapies that have the ability to enhance delivery through or penetrate into these barriers and to understand the mechanisms of resistance to therapy. The heterogeneity among and within different solid tumors and subtypes of solid tumors further adds to the difficulties in determining the most appropriate treatment approaches and methods of laboratory and clinical studies. This review article discusses therapies focused on prevention and treatment of CNS metastases, particularly regarding the BBB, and the challenges and opportunities these therapies present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon Puhalla
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - William Elmquist
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - David Freyer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Lawrence Kleinberg
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Chris Adkins
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Paul Lockman
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - John McGregor
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Leslie Muldoon
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Gary Nesbit
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - David Peereboom
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Quentin Smith
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Sara Walker
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Edward Neuwelt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lou C, Yokoyama S, Saiki I, Hayakawa Y. Selective anticancer activity of hirsutine against HER2‑positive breast cancer cells by inducing DNA damage. Oncol Rep 2015; 33:2072-6. [PMID: 25672479 DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.3796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Accepted: 01/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Hirsutine is one of the major alkaloids isolated from plants of the Uncaria genus and is known for its cardioprotective, anti‑hypertensive and anti-arrhythmic activities. We recently reported that hirsutine is an anti-metastatic phytochemical by targeting NF-κB activation in a murine breast cancer model. In the present study, we further examined the clinical utility of hirsutine against human breast cancer. Among six distinct human breast cancer cell lines, hirsutine showed strong cytotoxicity against HER2-positive/p53-mutated MDA-MB‑453 and BT474 cell lines. Conversely, HER2-negative/p53 wild‑type MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 cell lines showed resistance against hirsutine-induced cytotoxicity. Hirsutine induced apoptotic cell death in the MDA-MB-453 cells, but not in the MCF-7 cells, through activation of caspases. Furthermore, hirsutine induced the DNA damage response in the MDA-MB-453 cells, but not in the MCF-7 cells, as highlighted by the upregulation of γH2AX expression. Along with the induction of the DNA damage response, the suppression of HER2, NF-κB and Akt pathways and the activation of the p38 MAPK pathway in the MDA-MB-453 cells were observed. Considering that there was no difference between MDA-MB-453 and MCF-7 cells in regards to irinotecan‑induced DNA damage response, our present results indicate the selective anticancer activity of hirsutine in HER2-positive breast cancer by inducing a DNA damage response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenghua Lou
- Division of Pathogenic Biochemistry, Department of Bioscience, Institute of Natural Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| | - Satoru Yokoyama
- Division of Pathogenic Biochemistry, Department of Bioscience, Institute of Natural Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| | - Ikuo Saiki
- Division of Pathogenic Biochemistry, Department of Bioscience, Institute of Natural Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Hayakawa
- Division of Pathogenic Biochemistry, Department of Bioscience, Institute of Natural Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| |
Collapse
|