1
|
Mehrtash A, Ziegler E, Idris T, Somarouthu B, Urban T, LaCasce AS, Jacene H, Van Den Abbeele AD, Pieper S, Harris G, Kikinis R, Kapur T. Evaluation of mediastinal lymph node segmentation of heterogeneous CT data with full and weak supervision. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2024; 111:102312. [PMID: 38141568 PMCID: PMC10807363 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
Accurate lymph node size estimation is critical for staging cancer patients, initial therapeutic management, and assessing response to therapy. Current standard practice for quantifying lymph node size is based on a variety of criteria that use uni-directional or bi-directional measurements. Segmentation in 3D can provide more accurate evaluations of the lymph node size. Fully convolutional neural networks (FCNs) have achieved state-of-the-art results in segmentation for numerous medical imaging applications, including lymph node segmentation. Adoption of deep learning segmentation models in clinical trials often faces numerous challenges. These include lack of pixel-level ground truth annotations for training, generalizability of the models on unseen test domains due to the heterogeneity of test cases and variation of imaging parameters. In this paper, we studied and evaluated the performance of lymph node segmentation models on a dataset that was completely independent of the one used to create the models. We analyzed the generalizability of the models in the face of a heterogeneous dataset and assessed the potential effects of different disease conditions and imaging parameters. Furthermore, we systematically compared fully-supervised and weakly-supervised methods in this context. We evaluated the proposed methods using an independent dataset comprising 806 mediastinal lymph nodes from 540 unique patients. The results show that performance achieved on the independent test set is comparable to that on the training set. Furthermore, neither the underlying disease nor the heterogeneous imaging parameters impacted the performance of the models. Finally, the results indicate that our weakly-supervised method attains 90%- 91% of the performance achieved by the fully supervised training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Mehrtash
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Tagwa Idris
- Department of Radiology, Mass General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ann S LaCasce
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heather Jacene
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Boston, MA, USA; Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Annick D Van Den Abbeele
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, USA; Department of Radiology, Mass General Brigham, USA; Harvard Medical School, USA
| | | | - Gordon Harris
- Yunu, Inc., Cary, NC, USA; Department of Radiology, Mass General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ron Kikinis
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, USA
| | - Tina Kapur
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nigam R, Field M, Harris G, Barton M, Carolan M, Metcalfe P, Holloway L. Automated detection, delineation and quantification of whole-body bone metastasis using FDG-PET/CT images. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:851-863. [PMID: 37126152 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01258-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with the metastatic spread of disease to the bone have high morbidity and mortality. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy increases the progression free survival and overall survival of these patients with oligometastases. FDG-PET/CT, a functional imaging technique combining positron emission tomography (PET) with 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and computer tomography (CT) provides improved staging and identification of treatment response. It is also associated with reduction in size of the radiotherapy tumour volume delineation compared with CT based contouring in radiotherapy, thus allowing for dose escalation to the target volume with lower doses to the surrounding organs at risk. FDG-PET/CT is increasingly being used for the clinical management of NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy and has shown high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of bone metastases in these patients. Here, we present a software tool for detection, delineation and quantification of bone metastases using FDG-PET/CT images. The tool extracts standardised uptake values (SUV) from FDG-PET images for auto-segmentation of bone lesions and calculates volume of each lesion and associated mean and maximum SUV. The tool also allows automatic statistical validation of the auto-segmented bone lesions against the manual contours of a radiation oncologist. A retrospective review of FDG-PET/CT scans of more than 30 candidate NSCLC patients was performed and nine patients with one or more metastatic bone lesions were selected for the present study. The SUV threshold prediction model was designed by splitting the cohort of patients into a subset of 'development' and 'validation' cohorts. The development cohort yielded an optimum SUV threshold of 3.0 for automatic detection of bone metastases using FDG-PET/CT images. The validity of the derived optimum SUV threshold on the validation cohort demonstrated that auto-segmented and manually contoured bone lesions showed strong concordance for volume of bone lesion (r = 0.993) and number of detected lesions (r = 0.996). The tool has various applications in radiotherapy, including but not limited to studies determining optimum SUV threshold for accurate and standardised delineation of bone lesions and in scientific studies utilising large patient populations for instance for investigation of the number of metastatic lesions that can be treated safety with an ablative dose of radiotherapy without exceeding the normal tissue toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Nigam
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
| | - M Field
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - G Harris
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - M Barton
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - M Carolan
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia
| | - P Metcalfe
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
| | - L Holloway
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2505, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang JW, Chen W, Ly KI, Zhang X, Yan F, Jordan J, Harris G, Plotkin S, Hao P, Cai W. DINs: Deep Interactive Networks for Neurofibroma Segmentation in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 on Whole-Body MRI. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2022; 26:786-797. [PMID: 34106871 PMCID: PMC8855964 DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2021.3087735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant tumor predisposition syndrome that involves the central and peripheral nervous systems. Accurate detection and segmentation of neurofibromas are essential for assessing tumor burden and longitudinal tumor size changes. Automatic convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are sensitive and vulnerable as tumors' variable anatomical location and heterogeneous appearance on MRI. In this study, wepropose deep interactive networks (DINs) to address the above limitations. User interactions guide the model to recognize complicated tumors and quickly adapt to heterogeneous tumors. We introduce a simple but effective Exponential Distance Transform (ExpDT) that converts user interactions into guide maps regarded as the spatial and appearance prior. Comparing with popular Euclidean and geodesic distances, ExpDT is more robust to various image sizes, which reserves the distribution of interactive inputs. Furthermore, to enhance the tumor-related features, we design a deep interactive module to propagate the guides into deeper layers. We train and evaluate DINs on three MRI data sets from NF1 patients. The experiment results yield significant improvements of 44% and 14% in DSC comparing with automated and other interactive methods, respectively. We also experimentally demonstrate the efficiency of DINs in reducing user burden when comparing with conventional interactive methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Wei Zhang
- State Key Lab of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310012, China
| | - Wei Chen
- The State Key Lab of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310012, China
| | - K. Ina Ly
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Xubin Zhang
- State Key Lab of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310012, China
| | - Fan Yan
- State Key Lab of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310012, China
| | - Justin Jordan
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Gordon Harris
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Scott Plotkin
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Pengyi Hao
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310024, China
| | - Wenli Cai
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ahlawat S, Ly KI, Fayad LM, Fisher MJ, Lessing AJ, Berg DJ, Salamon JM, Mautner VF, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Dombi E, Harris G, Plotkin SR, Blakeley J. Imaging Evaluation of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Survey-Based Assessment. Neurology 2021; 97:S111-S119. [PMID: 34230200 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess imaging utilization practices across clinical specialists in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) for the evaluation of symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults with or without plexiform neurofibromas (PN). METHODS An institutional review board-exempt survey was administered to medical practitioners caring for individuals with NF1 at the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) meeting in September 2019. The survey included questions on respondent demographic data (9 questions), type of imaging obtained for asymptomatic (4 questions) and symptomatic (4 questions) people with and without PN, and utilization of diffusion-weighted imaging (2 questions). RESULTS Thirty practitioners participated in the survey. Most were academic neuro-oncologists at high-volume (>10 patients/week) NF1 centers. Of 30 respondents, 26 had access to whole-body MRI (WB-MRI). The most common approach to an asymptomatic person without PN was no imaging (adults: 57% [17/30]; children: 50% [15/30]), followed by a screening WB-MRI (adults: 20% [6/30]; children: 26.7% [8/30]). The most common approach to a person with symptoms or known PN was regional MRI (adults: 90% [27/30]; children: 93% [28/30]), followed by WB-MRI (adults: 20% [6/30]; children: 36.7% [11/30]). WB-MRI was most often obtained to evaluate a symptomatic child with PN (37% [11/30]). CONCLUSIONS More than 90% of practitioners indicated they would obtain a regional MRI in a symptomatic patient without known or visible PN. Otherwise, there was little consensus on imaging practices. Given the high prevalence of PN and risk of malignant conversion in this patient population, there is a need to define imaging-based guidelines for optimal clinical care and the design of future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
| | - K Ina Ly
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Laura M Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael J Fisher
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Andrés J Lessing
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dale J Berg
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Johannes M Salamon
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Victor-Felix Mautner
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dusica Babovic-Vuksanovic
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Eva Dombi
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Gordon Harris
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Scott R Plotkin
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jaishri Blakeley
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (K.I.L., S.R.P.) and Department of Radiology (G.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Neurofibromatosis Northeast (A.J.L., D.J.B.), Burlington, MA; Department of Neurology (J.M.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (V.-F.M.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Mayo Clinic (D.B.-V.), Rochester, MN; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology (J.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thondapu V, Ranganath P, Zhang E, Takigami A, Kohanski M, McGowan J, Harris G, Tower-Rader A, Meyersohn N, Lu M, Hoffmann U, Hedgire S, Ghoshhajra B. Integration Of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Ct Angiography (FFRCT) Into Clinical Practice: Initial Experience From A Tertiary Care Center. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2021.06.212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
6
|
Talley NJ, Walker MM, Jones M, Keely S, Koloski N, Cameron R, Fairlie T, Burns G, Shah A, Hansen T, Harris G, Holtmann G. Letter: budesonide for functional dyspepsia with duodenal eosinophilia-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021; 53:1332-1333. [PMID: 34029411 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N J Talley
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - M M Walker
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - M Jones
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.,Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - S Keely
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - N Koloski
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.,Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Ryde, NSW, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Princess Alexander Hospital, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
| | - R Cameron
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - T Fairlie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Princess Alexander Hospital, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
| | - G Burns
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - A Shah
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Princess Alexander Hospital, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
| | - T Hansen
- Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - G Harris
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - G Holtmann
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Princess Alexander Hospital, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leone JP, Emblem KE, Weitz M, Gelman RS, Schneider BP, Freedman RA, Younger J, Pinho MC, Sorensen AG, Gerstner ER, Harris G, Krop IE, Morganstern D, Sohl J, Hu J, Kasparian E, Winer EP, Lin NU. Phase II trial of carboplatin and bevacizumab in patients with breast cancer brain metastases. Breast Cancer Res 2020; 22:131. [PMID: 33256829 PMCID: PMC7706261 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01372-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab and carboplatin in patients with breast cancer brain metastases. METHODS We enrolled patients with breast cancer and > 1 measurable new or progressive brain metastasis. Patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously (IV) on cycle 1 day 1 and carboplatin IV AUC = 5 on cycle 1 day 8. Patients with HER2-positive disease also received trastuzumab. In subsequent cycles, all drugs were administered on day 1 of each cycle. Contrast-enhanced brain MRI was performed at baseline, 24-96 h after the first bevacizumab dose (day + 1), and every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate in the central nervous system (CNS ORR) by composite criteria. Associations between germline VEGF single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs699947, rs2019063, rs1570360, rs833061) and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were explored, as were associations between early (day + 1) MRI changes and outcomes. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were enrolled (29 HER2-positive, 9 HER2-negative); all were evaluable for response. The CNS ORR was 63% (95% CI, 46-78). Median PFS was 5.62 months and median OS was 14.10 months. As compared with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0, patients with ECOG PS 1-2 had significantly worse PFS and OS (all P < 0.01). No significant associations between VEGF genotypes or early MRI changes and clinical outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS The combination of bevacizumab and carboplatin results in a high rate of durable objective response in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer. This regimen warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01004172 . Registered 28 October 2009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Pablo Leone
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Kyrre E Emblem
- Department of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michelle Weitz
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Rebecca S Gelman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | - Rachel A Freedman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | - Marco C Pinho
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ian E Krop
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Daniel Morganstern
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jessica Sohl
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jiani Hu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Elizabeth Kasparian
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ly I, Thalheimer R, Cai W, Bredella M, Muzikansky A, Merker V, Herr H, Da J, Harris G, Plotkin S, Jordan J. NIMG-07. LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF SCHWANNOMA GROWTH BEHAVIOR IN ADULT NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 2 AND SCHWANNOMATOSIS PATIENTS USING WHOLE-BODY MRI. Neuro Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and schwannomatosis (SWN) are related genetic tumor predisposition syndromes caused by distinct germline pathogenic variants on chromosome 22. Both conditions are characterized by the presence of cranial, peripheral, and/or spinal nerve schwannomas. The long-term growth behavior of schwannomas is unknown but knowledge thereof would help guide patient surveillance and selection for treatment and improvement of clinical trial design. Whole-body MRI (WBMRI) can detect whole-body schwannoma burden in a single image acquisition session.
METHODS
12 NF2 and 10 SWN patients who underwent a WBMRI between 2007-2010 underwent a repeat WBMRI between 2018-2019. Schwannomas were segmented on short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Tumor volume was calculated using a three-dimensional tumor quantification software (3DQI). Tumor growth and shrinkage were defined as a volume change ≥ 20% over the entire study period.
RESULTS
Median time between scans was 10 years. A total of 103 schwannomas (46 NF2-associated, 57 SWN-associated) were analyzed. In both NF2 and SWN, 50% of tumors grew. Median growth was 88.3% in NF2 and 100.4% in SWN. All growing NF2-associated schwannomas grew in the setting of exposure to systemic therapy whereas only one growing SWN-associated tumor had been treated systemically. Excluding resected tumors, 19.4% of schwannomas shrank. Median shrinkage was 48.5% in NF2 and 37.4% in SWN. All shrinking NF2-associated tumors had been treated with systemic therapy whereas none of the shrinking SWN-associated tumors had been. 19 new tumors (7 NF2-associated, 12 SWN-associated) developed in 8 patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Half of NF2- and SWN-associated schwannomas grow significantly over a decade. In NF2 patients, growth occurs despite systemic treatment whereas, in SWN patients, schwannomas may shrink spontaneously without treatment. These findings may suggest a more aggressive tumor phenotype in NF2. Continued patient enrollment and correlation of MRI findings with functional outcomes and hormone exposure history are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Ly
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Wenli Cai
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Vanessa Merker
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Da
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dennis K, Harris G, Kamel R, Barnes T, Balboni T, Fenton P, Rembielak A. Rapid Access Palliative Radiotherapy Programmes. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:704-712. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
10
|
Patel J, Kittleson M, Chang D, Nishihara K, Shen A, Harris G, Velleca A, Azarbal B, Czer L, Ramzy D, Kobashigawa J. Pre-Transplant Collagen Vascular Disease as a Risk Factor for Increase in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy after Heart Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
11
|
McCart Reed AE, Kalaw E, Nones K, Bettington M, Lim M, Bennett J, Johnstone K, Kutasovic JR, Kazakoff S, Xu QC, Saunus JM, Reid LE, Black D, Niland C, Ferguson K, Gresshoff I, Raghavendra A, Liu JC, Kalinowski L, Reid AS, Davidson M, Pearson JV, Yamaguchi R, Harris G, Tse G, Papadimos D, Pathmanathan R, Pathmanathan N, Tan PH, Fox S, O'Toole S, Waddell N, Simpson PT, Lakhani SR. Abstract P3-08-03: Dissecting the heterogeneity of metaplastic breast cancer: A morphological, immunohistochemical and genomic analysis of a large cohort. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-08-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Although rare, Metaplastic Breast Carcinomas (MBC) account for significant global breast cancer mortality. This subgroup is extremely heterogeneous and by definition exhibits metaplastic change to squamous and/or mesenchymal elements, including but not limited to spindle, squamous, chondroid, osseous and rhabdomyoid elements. The WHO working group recognizes that the current classification is inadequate and in the interim, has suggested a purely descriptive classification. The mixed epithelial-mesenchymal morphology has led to speculation that MBC represent 'stem cell tumours'; in support of this, MBC have been shown to have a CD44+/CD24-/low phenotype. Clinically, patients present with tumours that are larger (higher stage), have increased likelihood of distant metastases at presentation and overall, have a reduced 5-year survival rate compared to Invasive Carcinoma-NST. Hence, this is a unique subtype with poor outcome but without a robust classification or understanding of the biology to aid clinical management. We present a detailed morphological, immunohistochemical and genomic analysis of a large series of MBC (n=347), as amassed through the Asia-Pacific MBC consortium. We consider our morphological dissection using the WHO subtyping guidelines and show that an increasing number of phenotypes in a mixed MBC (classified as WHO_1) significantly associates with a poor prognosis. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that a pure spindle (WHO_5) is significantly less likely to express vimentin, CK5/6, CK14, and CK19 than a mixed WHO_1 with spindle features. Similarly, a WHO_1 with chondroid features is less likely to express EGFR than WHO_1 with chondroid features and rhabdoid or osseous differentiation. Across the cohort, positivity for the AE1/3 antibody and a lack of EGFR expression both significantly associate with a better outcome. We report no significant association between patient age at diagnosis and breast cancer specific survival, nor between age and specific WHO MBC subtypes. We report a significant association between WHO_1 types and increasing tumour grade, and also between tumour size and grade, with tumour size being a highly significant prognostic indicator in this cohort. Our exome sequencing confirms a significant enrichment for TP53 and PTEN mutations in MBC, and intriguingly for concurrent mutations of TP53, PTEN and PIK3CA. A novel enrichment for NF1 mutations is also presented. In summary, we provide a thorough assessment of a large cohort of MBC, including morphology, survival, IHC and exome sequencing, and present our analysis contextualized by the WHO guidelines, extending the existing knowledge base of this rare tumour type.
Citation Format: McCart Reed AE, Kalaw E, Nones K, Bettington M, Lim M, Bennett J, Johnstone K, Kutasovic JR, Kazakoff S, Xu QC, Saunus JM, Reid LE, Black D, Niland C, Ferguson K, Gresshoff I, Raghavendra A, Liu JC, Kalinowski L, Reid AS, Davidson M, Pearson JV, Yamaguchi R, Harris G, Tse G, Papadimos D, Pathmanathan R, Pathmanathan N, Tan PH, Fox S, O'Toole S, Waddell N, Simpson PT, Lakhani SR. Dissecting the heterogeneity of metaplastic breast cancer: A morphological, immunohistochemical and genomic analysis of a large cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AE McCart Reed
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - E Kalaw
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - K Nones
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - M Bettington
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - M Lim
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - J Bennett
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - K Johnstone
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - JR Kutasovic
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - S Kazakoff
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - QC Xu
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - JM Saunus
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - LE Reid
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - D Black
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Niland
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - K Ferguson
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - I Gresshoff
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - A Raghavendra
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - JC Liu
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - L Kalinowski
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - AS Reid
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - M Davidson
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - JV Pearson
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Yamaguchi
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - G Harris
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - G Tse
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - D Papadimos
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Pathmanathan
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - N Pathmanathan
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - PH Tan
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - S Fox
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - S O'Toole
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - N Waddell
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - PT Simpson
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - SR Lakhani
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Australia; Sime Darby Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and the Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kube E, Hicken B, Moye J, Harris G, Sullivan J. MENTAL HEALTH INTEGRATION IN GERI PACT. Innov Aging 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy023.2976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E Kube
- Iora Primary Care, Glendale, Arizona, USA, Glendale, Arizona, United States
| | - B Hicken
- VA Salt Lake City, St. Lake City UT, USA
| | - J Moye
- ABPP, New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC); Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School
| | - G Harris
- St. Louis VA Healthcare System,St. Louis MO, USA
| | - J Sullivan
- CHOIR VA Boston Healthcare System and BU School of Public Health, Boston MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gridley T, Elwen SH, Harris G, Moore DM, Hoelzel AR, Lampen F. Hybridization in bottlenose dolphins-A case study of Tursiops aduncus × T. truncatus hybrids and successful backcross hybridization events. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0201722. [PMID: 30208020 PMCID: PMC6135391 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The bottlenose dolphin, genus Tursiops is one of the best studied of all the Cetacea with a minimum of two species widely recognised. Common bottlenose dolphins (T. truncatus), are the cetacean species most frequently held in captivity and are known to hybridize with species from at least 6 different genera. In this study, we document several intra-generic hybridization events between T. truncatus and T. aduncus held in captivity. We demonstrate that the F1 hybrids are fertile and can backcross producing apparently healthy offspring, thereby showing introgressive inter-specific hybridization within the genus. We document that female F1 hybrids can reach sexual maturity at 4 yr and 3 mo of age, and can become pregnant and give birth before being fully weaned. The information presented has implications for understanding hybrid reticulation among cetacean species and practical implications for captive facilities housing either Tursiops species or hybrids thereof.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Gridley
- Centre for Statistics in Ecology, Environment and Conservation, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, C/o Sea Search Research and Conservation NPC, Muizenberg Cape Town, South Africa
- * E-mail:
| | - S. H. Elwen
- Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, C/o Sea Search Research and Conservation NPC, Muizenberg Cape Town, South Africa
| | - G. Harris
- The South African Association for Marine Biological Research, uShaka Sea World, Point, Durban, South Africa
| | - D. M. Moore
- Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
| | - A. R. Hoelzel
- Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
| | - F. Lampen
- The South African Association for Marine Biological Research, uShaka Sea World, Point, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Davey V, Raturaga T, Shirley R, Barrett K, Harvey V, Campbell I, Foster A, Harris G. PO6 Consolidation of the four New Zealand breast cancer registers. Breast 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
15
|
Chennubhotla C, Clarke LP, Fedorov A, Foran D, Harris G, Helton E, Nordstrom R, Prior F, Rubin D, Saltz JH, Shalley E, Sharma A. An Assessment of Imaging Informatics for Precision Medicine in Cancer. Yearb Med Inform 2017; 26:110-119. [PMID: 29063549 DOI: 10.15265/iy-2017-041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Precision medicine requires the measurement, quantification, and cataloging of medical characteristics to identify the most effective medical intervention. However, the amount of available data exceeds our current capacity to extract meaningful information. We examine the informatics needs to achieve precision medicine from the perspective of quantitative imaging and oncology. Methods: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) organized several workshops on the topic of medical imaging and precision medicine. The observations and recommendations are summarized herein. Results: Recommendations include: use of standards in data collection and clinical correlates to promote interoperability; data sharing and validation of imaging tools; clinician's feedback in all phases of research and development; use of open-source architecture to encourage reproducibility and reusability; use of challenges which simulate real-world situations to incentivize innovation; partnership with industry to facilitate commercialization; and education in academic communities regarding the challenges involved with translation of technology from the research domain to clinical utility and the benefits of doing so. Conclusions: This article provides a survey of the role and priorities for imaging informatics to help advance quantitative imaging in the era of precision medicine. While these recommendations were drawn from oncology, they are relevant and applicable to other clinical domains where imaging aids precision medicine.
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Stewart DR, Butler MJ, Harris G, Johnson LA, Radke WR. Estimating abundance of endangered fish by eliminating bias from non-constant detectability. ENDANGER SPECIES RES 2017. [DOI: 10.3354/esr00792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
18
|
Jordan J, Smith M, Merker V, Cai W, Harris G, Bredella M, Erdin S, Gusella J, Plotkin S. NIMG-64. NOVEL METHODS FOR GENOTYPE-PHENOTYPE CORRELATION IN SCHWANNOMATOSIS. Neuro Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now212.575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
19
|
Harris G, Maertens A, Pamies D, Hogberg H, Delp J, Hartung T, Smirnova L. Mechanisms of toxicity and resilience of an in vitro 3D human dopaminergic model to Rotenone. Toxicol Lett 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.07.490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
20
|
Pamies D, Barreras P, Block K, Makri G, Kumar A, Wiersma D, Smirnova L, Zang C, Bressler J, Christian K, Harris G, Berlinicke C, Kyro K, Song H, Pardo C, Hartung T, Hogberg H. iPSC derived brain microphysiological system for developmental neurotoxicity. Toxicol Lett 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.07.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
21
|
Smirnova L, Harris G, Zhao L, Maertens A, Hartung T. Cellular resilience in neurotoxicity: The case of Parkinson's disease. Toxicol Lett 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.06.1568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
22
|
Harris G. Tasting, rating and peer pressure; increases willingness to try new foods in children. Appetite 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
23
|
Dusinska M, Boland S, Saunders M, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Tran L, Pojana G, Marcomini A, Volkovova K, Tulinska J, Knudsen LE, Gombau L, Whelan M, Collins AR, Marano F, Housiadas C, Bilanicova D, Halamoda Kenzaoui B, Correia Carreira S, Magdolenova Z, Fjellsbø LM, Huk A, Handy R, Walker L, Barancokova M, Bartonova A, Burello E, Castell J, Cowie H, Drlickova M, Guadagnini R, Harris G, Harju M, Heimstad ES, Hurbankova M, Kazimirova A, Kovacikova Z, Kuricova M, Liskova A, Milcamps A, Neubauerova E, Palosaari T, Papazafiri P, Pilou M, Poulsen MS, Ross B, Runden-Pran E, Sebekova K, Staruchova M, Vallotto D, Worth A. Towards an alternative testing strategy for nanomaterials used in nanomedicine: lessons from NanoTEST. Nanotoxicology 2016; 9 Suppl 1:118-32. [PMID: 25923349 DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2014.991431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
In spite of recent advances in describing the health outcomes of exposure to nanoparticles (NPs), it still remains unclear how exactly NPs interact with their cellular targets. Size, surface, mass, geometry, and composition may all play a beneficial role as well as causing toxicity. Concerns of scientists, politicians and the public about potential health hazards associated with NPs need to be answered. With the variety of exposure routes available, there is potential for NPs to reach every organ in the body but we know little about the impact this might have. The main objective of the FP7 NanoTEST project ( www.nanotest-fp7.eu ) was a better understanding of mechanisms of interactions of NPs employed in nanomedicine with cells, tissues and organs and to address critical issues relating to toxicity testing especially with respect to alternatives to tests on animals. Here we describe an approach towards alternative testing strategies for hazard and risk assessment of nanomaterials, highlighting the adaptation of standard methods demanded by the special physicochemical features of nanomaterials and bioavailability studies. The work has assessed a broad range of toxicity tests, cell models and NP types and concentrations taking into account the inherent impact of NP properties and the effects of changes in experimental conditions using well-characterized NPs. The results of the studies have been used to generate recommendations for a suitable and robust testing strategy which can be applied to new medical NPs as they are developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dusinska
- Health Effects Laboratory-MILK, NILU - Norwegian Institute for Air Research , Kjeller , Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Smirnova L, Harris G, Delp J, Valadares M, Pamies D, Hogberg HT, Waldmann T, Leist M, Hartung T. A LUHMES 3D dopaminergic neuronal model for neurotoxicity testing allowing long-term exposure and cellular resilience analysis. Arch Toxicol 2015; 90:2725-2743. [PMID: 26647301 PMCID: PMC5065586 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-015-1637-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Several shortcomings of current Parkinson’s disease (PD) models limit progress in identification of environmental contributions to disease pathogenesis. The conditionally immortalized cell line LUHMES promises to make human dopaminergic neuronal cultures more easily available, but these cells are difficult to culture for extended periods of time. We overcame this problem by culturing them in 3D with minor medium modifications. The 3D neuronal aggregates allowed penetration by small molecules and sufficient oxygen and nutrient supply for survival of the innermost cells. Using confocal microscopy, gene expression, and flow cytometry, we characterized the 3D model and observed a highly reproducible differentiation process. Visualization and quantification of neurites in aggregates was achieved by adding 2 % red fluorescent protein-transfected LUHMES cells. The mitochondrial toxicants and established experimental PD agents, rotenone and MPP+, perturbed genes involved in one-carbon metabolism and transsulfuration pathways (ASS1, CTH, and SHTM2) as in 2D cultures. We showed, for the first time in LUHMES, down-regulation of mir-7, a miRNA known to target alpha-synuclein and to be involved in PD. This was observed as early as 12 h after rotenone exposure, when pro-apoptotic mir-16 and rotenone-sensitive mir-210 were not yet significantly perturbed. Finally, washout experiments demonstrated that withdrawal of rotenone led to counter-regulation of mir-7 and ASS1, CTH, and SHTM2 genes. This suggests a possible role of these genes in direct cellular response to the toxicant, and the model appears to be suitable to address the processes of resilience and recovery in neurotoxicology and Parkinson’s disease in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Smirnova
- Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
| | - G Harris
- Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - J Delp
- Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - M Valadares
- Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - D Pamies
- Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - H T Hogberg
- Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - T Waldmann
- Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - M Leist
- Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - T Hartung
- Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
- Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Harris G, Kneebone A, Whalley D, McCloud P, Thompson S, Guo L, Eade T. The Timing of Salvage Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy: Waiting for the PSA to Climb Above 0.2 May Compromise Outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.1072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
26
|
Smirnova L, Hogberg H, Harris G, Zhao L, Block K, Pardo C, Barreras P, Christian K, Zhang C, Kyro K, Hartung T, Pamies D. DNTox-21c 3D brain models to predict DNT and study neurodegeneration. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2015.04.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
27
|
Lu D, Wu Y, Harris G, Cai W. Iterative mesh transformation for 3D segmentation of livers with cancers in CT images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2015; 43:1-14. [PMID: 25728595 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2014] [Revised: 11/20/2014] [Accepted: 01/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Segmentation of diseased liver remains a challenging task in clinical applications due to the high inter-patient variability in liver shapes, sizes and pathologies caused by cancers or other liver diseases. In this paper, we present a multi-resolution mesh segmentation algorithm for 3D segmentation of livers, called iterative mesh transformation that deforms the mesh of a region-of-interest (ROI) in a progressive manner by iterations between mesh transformation and contour optimization. Mesh transformation deforms the 3D mesh based on the deformation transfer model that searches the optimal mesh based on the affine transformation subjected to a set of constraints of targeting vertices. Besides, contour optimization searches the optimal transversal contours of the ROI by applying the dynamic-programming algorithm to the intersection polylines of the 3D mesh on 2D transversal image planes. The initial constraint set for mesh transformation can be defined by a very small number of targeting vertices, namely landmarks, and progressively updated by adding the targeting vertices selected from the optimal transversal contours calculated in contour optimization. This iterative 3D mesh transformation constrained by 2D optimal transversal contours provides an efficient solution to a progressive approximation of the mesh of the targeting ROI. Based on this iterative mesh transformation algorithm, we developed a semi-automated scheme for segmentation of diseased livers with cancers using as little as five user-identified landmarks. The evaluation study demonstrates that this semi-automated liver segmentation scheme can achieve accurate and reliable segmentation results with significant reduction of interaction time and efforts when dealing with diseased liver cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Difei Lu
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, USA; Department of Informatics, Zhejiang Police College, China
| | - Yin Wu
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, USA
| | - Gordon Harris
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, USA
| | - Wenli Cai
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Emblem K, Pinho M, Chandra V, Gerstner E, Stufflebeam S, Sorenson G, Harris G, Freedman R, Sohl J, Younger J, Krop I, Winer E, Lin N. NI-23 * BRAIN BREAST METASTASES RESPOND TO ANTI-ANGIOGENIC THERAPY BY MODES OF VASCULAR NORMALIZATION. Neuro Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou264.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- G Harris
- Division of Experimental Pathology, The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, London W6 7DW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Greystoke A, Harris G, Jenkins M, Goonetilleke D, Moore D, Lancashire M, Ranson M, Hughes A, Clack G, Dive C. Assessment of diurnal changes and confounding factors that affect circulating cell death biomarker levels: A short communication. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2013; 84:184-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2013] [Revised: 06/03/2013] [Accepted: 06/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
31
|
Olukoga A, Bachmann M, Harris G, Olukoga T, Oluwadiya K. Analysis of the perception of institutional function for health sector reform in Nigeria. Int Health 2013; 2:150-5. [PMID: 24037474 DOI: 10.1016/j.inhe.2009.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Institutional function reflects the institution's understanding of the world around it, its ability to locate itself within that world and to make decisions in relation to it. Three dimensions of institutional function were identified as management, environmental mastery and service delivery. This study analysed the perception of institutional function of four hospitals in Nigeria by 507 healthcare professionals and managers and its influence on the implementation of the health sector reform programme in the country. The respondents were doctors and dentists (30%), nurses (27.2%), pharmacists (8.9%), managers (15.5%) and other allied healthcare workers (18.4%). The overall perception of institutional function was 56.3%. The perceptions of the three dimensions of institutional function were management 52.7%, environmental mastery 50.8% and service delivery 62.6%. Three out of 12 statements on institutional function had levels of perception that were lower than 50%. These were adequacy of management skills (49.7%), functioning management information systems that are used in management decision-making (47.9%) and degree of autonomy for the hospitals (42.4%). There is the need to strengthen the institutional function of Nigerian hospitals, especially the acquisition of management skills by the healthcare professionals and managers, management information systems and autonomy for the hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Olukoga
- School of Medicine, Health Policy & Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TU, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Smirnova L, Harris G, Hogberg H, Martos S, Hartung T. miRNomics, metabolomics and 3D neuronal differentiation of LUHMES progenitor cells as an in vitro model for DNT studies. Toxicol Lett 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.05.321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
33
|
Harris G, Barton-Wright EC, Curtis NS. CARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITION OF WORT AND SOME ASPECTS OF THE BIOCHEMISTRY OF FERMENTATION. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1951.tb01627.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
34
|
|
35
|
Harris G, Pollock JRA. AMINO ACIDS AND PEPTIDES OF HOPS AND WORTS II. PIPECOLINIC ACID, A NEW AMINO ACID IN BARLEY AND HOPS. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1953.tb02709.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
36
|
|
37
|
|
38
|
Davies JW, Harris G, Parsons R. NITROGENOUS CONSTITUENTS OF BREWING MATERIALS: V. EXAMINATION OF THE ACTION OF SELECTED PRECIPITANTS ON BREWERS' WORTS. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1956.tb02830.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
39
|
Harris G, MacWilliam IC. CARBOHYDRATES IN MALTING AND BREWING: II* CHANGES IN THE CARBOHYDRATES OF BARLEY DURING RIPENING, DRYING AND STORAGE. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1954.tb02766.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
40
|
Harris G, MacWilliam IC. CARBOHYDRATES IN MALTING AND BREWING: VII. COMPLEX CARBOHYDRATES OF INFUSION WORT AND THEIR ENZYMIC DEGRADATION. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1958.tb01403.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
41
|
Davies JW, Harris G, Parsons R. NITROGENOUS CONSTITUENTS OF BREWING MATERIALS: VI. USE OF ION-EXCHANGE RESINS IN FRACTIONATING THE NITROGEN COMPOUNDS OF BREWERS' WORTS. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1956.tb02831.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
42
|
|
43
|
Harris G, Ricketts RW. STUDIES ON NON-BIOLOGICAL HAZES OF BEERS VII. THE USE OF POLYAMIDE RESINS FOR REMOVING THE HAZE-FORMING POLYPHENOLS FROM BEER*. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1959.tb01454.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
44
|
|
45
|
MacWilliam IC, Harris G. ENZYMES OF BARLEY AND MALT II. RAPID PRELIMINARY FRACTIONATION BY SELECTIVE ELUTION FROM ALUMINA. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1957.tb02901.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
46
|
Hall RD, Harris G, Ricketts RW. STUDIES ON NON-BIOLOGICAL HAZES OF BEERS V. ROLE OF HOP AND MALT TANNINS. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1959.tb01452.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
47
|
Harris G, Merritt NR. BREWING INDUSTRY RESEARCH FOUNDATION. COMPARISON OF THE COURSE OF FERMENTATION IN A CONTINUOUS AND A BATCH BREWING PROCESS. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1961.tb01827.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
48
|
MacWilliam IC, Hall RD, Harris G. CARBOHYDRATES IN MALTING AND BREWING IV. DETERMINATION OF STARCH IN BARLEY AND MALT. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1956.tb02853.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
49
|
Harris G, Merritt NR. NOTE ON THE ACCELERATION OF CONTINUOUS FERMENTATIONS BY MEANS OF YEAST AUTOLYSATES. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1962.tb01858.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
50
|
Hall RD, Harris G, MacWilliam IC. CARBOHYDRATES IN MALTING AND BREWING XI. NOTE ON A MODIFICATION OF THE CONVENTIONAL PROCESS OF INFUSION MASHING. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1961.tb01773.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|