Pathologic complete response and overall survival in breast cancer subtypes in stage III inflammatory breast cancer

Comparison of Survival Outcomes of Breast-Conserving Surgery Plus Radiotherapy with Mastectomy in Early Breast Cancer Patients: Less Is More?

PURPOSE

To compare the survival outcomes of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy.

METHOD

This retrospective study includes 1330 early-stage breast cancer patients treated at Chiang Mai University (CMU) hospital, using data from the Chiang Mai Cancer Registry between 2004 and 2015. Information pertinent to patients and their treatment was collected for analysis. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of 1330 patients showed significant differences between the BCT and mastectomy groups in terms of age, tumor size, and tumor location. BCT patients were younger, had smaller tumors, and exhibited less nodal involvement. Propensity score matching created a balanced cohort of 534 patients where differences persisted in age and tumor size. Univariate analysis revealed significant survival associations for BCT, younger age, and smaller tumor size. Multivariate analysis confirmed these factors, with BCT showing an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.36-0.93; p = 0.023) compared to mastectomy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significant survival advantage for BCT, particularly in HER2-enriched and triple-negative subtypes. The 15-year overall survival was 80.01% in the BCT group versus 64.33% in the mastectomy group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals key differences between outcomes following breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy patients, including age and tumor characteristics. BCT showed improved overall survival, particularly in HER2-enriched and triple-negative breast cancers. However, our study's limitations may affect the results. These findings suggest that BCT may offer survival benefits for specific subtypes, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment approaches.

Trends in Guideline-Concordant Care for Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Importance

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive variant for which trimodality treatment (ie, neoadjuvant systemic therapy [NST] followed by modified radical mastectomy without immediate reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy [PMRT]) represents guideline-concordant care (GCC) and is associated with improved overall survival (OS). However, it is unclear whether there are disparities in trimodality treatment receipt among patients with IBC and how such disparities might affect OS.

Objective

To assess trends in IBC trimodality treatment receipt in a contemporary cohort.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the National Cancer Database. Women with nonmetastatic IBC treated from calendar years 2010 to 2018 were included. Data analysis was performed from April 1, 2023, to March 1, 2024.

Exposures

Guideline-concordant care (ie, trimodality treatment administered in the correct sequence with time to NST initiation <60 days post diagnosis).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcomes were associations between patient-, disease-, treatment-, and facility-level factors and receipt of overall and modality-specific GCC and associations between these factors and adjusted OS.

Results

Of 6945 patients identified (median age, 57 [IQR, 47-66] years; 2.4% Asian or Pacific Islander, 7.8% Hispanic, 17.1% non-Hispanic Black, and 71.5% non-Hispanic White), only 1740 (25.1%) received all forms of GCC: 91.3% (n = 5662) received NST initiation less than 60 days post diagnosis, 63.3% (n = 4395) received PMRT, and 51.3% (n = 3564) underwent guideline-concordant surgery (ie, modified radical mastectomy without immediate reconstruction with >6 lymph nodes removed). Receipt of GCC did not differ significantly by race and ethnicity, insurance status, or location. Asian (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.84), Black (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.41-0.68), and Hispanic (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.55) patients were less likely to have NST initiation less than 60 days post diagnosis vs White patients (all P ≤ .001). Recipients of GCC had improved adjusted OS vs nonrecipients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84; P < .001). Black patients had significantly lower adjusted OS ,compared with White recipients (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.26-1.58; P < .001). When GCC was received for triple-negative IBC, there was no racial and ethnic disparity in OS.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of women with nonmetastatic IBC, there were no disparities observed in GCC receipt, but only 25.1% of patients with IBC received all forms of GCC for which they were eligible. Among those who received GCC, there was no racial disparity in survival for triple-negative IBC, suggesting opportunities to improve equity through standardization of care.

Clinical outcomes after 1 versus 2-3 lines of neoadjuvant therapy in stage III inflammatory breast cancer

PURPOSE

Many stage III inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients experience a sufficient response to first-line (1L) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to allow surgery, while some require additional NAC. We evaluated the pathologic complete response (pCR), breast cancer-free survival (BCFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients requiring 1 vs. 2-3 lines (L) of NAC prior to surgery.

METHODS

Stage III IBC patients from 2 institutions who received 1L or 2-3L of NAC prior to surgery were identified. Hormone receptor and HER2 status, grade, and pCR were evaluated. BCFS and OS were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox models were utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR).

RESULTS

808 eligible patients (1997-2020) were identified (median age 51 years, median follow-up 69 months). 733 (91%) had 1L and 75 (9%) had 2-3L of NAC. Grade III, triple-negative and HER2-positive disease were more prevalent in 2-3L patients. 178 (24%) 1L and 14 (19%) 2-3L patients had pCR. 376 1L patients and 41 2-3L patients had recurrences. The 5-year BCFS was worse for the 2-3L group (33 vs. 46%, HR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.99-1.91). However, in 192 patients with a pCR, BCFS was similar (76 vs. 83% in 1L vs. 2-3L, respectively). There were 308 deaths (276 among 1L and 32 among 2-3L patients). The 5-year OS in 1L vs. 2-3L was 60 vs. 53% (HR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.91-1.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Among stage III IBC patients, pCR rates were similar, irrespective of the NAC lines number, and BCFS and OS were comparable with pCR after 1L and 2-3L.

Treatment Response, Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Clinical Outcomes in Inflammatory Breast Cancer-Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare (1%-5%), aggressive form of breast cancer, accounting for approximately 10% of breast cancer mortality. In the localized setting, standard of care is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) ± anti-HER2 therapy, followed by surgery. Here we investigated associations between clinicopathologic variables, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL), and pathologic complete response (pCR), and the prognostic value of pCR. We included 494 localized patients with IBC treated with NACT from October 1996 to October 2021 in eight European hospitals. Standard clinicopathologic variables were collected and central pathologic review was performed, including sTIL. Associations were assessed using Firth logistic regression models. Cox regressions were used to evaluate the role of pCR and residual cancer burden (RCB) on disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS). Distribution according to receptor status was as follows: 26.4% estrogen receptor negative (ER-)/HER2-; 22.0% ER-/HER2+; 37.4% ER+/HER2-, and 14.1% ER+/HER2+. Overall pCR rate was 26.3%, being highest in the HER2+ groups (45.9% for ER-/HER2+ and 42.9% for ER+/HER2+). sTILs were low (median: 5.3%), being highest in the ER-/HER2- group (median: 10%). High tumor grade, ER negativity, HER2 positivity, higher sTILs, and taxane-based NACT were significantly associated with pCR. pCR was associated with improved DFS, DRFS, and OS in multivariable analyses. RCB score in patients not achieving pCR was independently associated with survival. In conclusion, sTILs were low in IBC, but were predictive of pCR. Both pCR and RCB have an independent prognostic role in IBC treated with NACT.

SIGNIFICANCE

IBC is a rare, but very aggressive type of breast cancer. The prognostic role of pCR after systemic therapy and the predictive value of sTILs for pCR are well established in the general breast cancer population; however, only limited information is available in IBC. We assembled the largest retrospective IBC series so far and demonstrated that sTIL is predictive of pCR. We emphasize that reaching pCR remains of utmost importance in IBC.

Machine learning prediction of pathological complete response and overall survival of breast cancer patients in an underserved inner-city population

BACKGROUND

Generalizability of predictive models for pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients requires diverse datasets. This study employed four machine learning models to predict pCR and OS up to 7.5 years using data from a diverse and underserved inner-city population.

METHODS

Demographics, staging, tumor subtypes, income, insurance status, and data from radiology reports were obtained from 475 breast cancer patients on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in an inner-city health system (01/01/2012 to 12/31/2021). Logistic regression, Neural Network, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosted Regression models were used to predict outcomes (pCR and OS) with fivefold cross validation.

RESULTS

pCR was not associated with age, race, ethnicity, tumor staging, Nottingham grade, income, and insurance status (p > 0.05). ER-/HER2+ showed the highest pCR rate, followed by triple negative, ER+/HER2+, and ER+/HER2- (all p < 0.05), tumor size (p < 0.003) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) (p < 0.01). Machine learning models ranked ER+/HER2-, ER-/HER2+, tumor size, and BPE as top predictors of pCR (AUC = 0.74-0.76). OS was associated with race, pCR status, tumor subtype, and insurance status (p < 0.05), but not ethnicity and incomes (p > 0.05). Machine learning models ranked tumor stage, pCR, nodal stage, and triple-negative subtype as top predictors of OS (AUC = 0.83-0.85). When grouping race and ethnicity by tumor subtypes, neither OS nor pCR were different due to race and ethnicity for each tumor subtype (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tumor subtypes and imaging characteristics were top predictors of pCR in our inner-city population. Insurance status, race, tumor subtypes and pCR were associated with OS. Machine learning models accurately predicted pCR and OS.

Preoperative Radiation Therapy for Chemorefractory Localized Inflammatory Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare breast cancer subtype. Chemorefractory nonmetastatic IBC, defined by locoregional progression under neoadjuvant chemotherapy, is a rare situation with few therapeutic options. Owing to the rarity of this clinical presentation and the lack of specific data, no specific management guidelines exist. We evaluated whether preoperative radiation therapy/chemoradiotherapy could achieve locoregional control after first-line neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with IBC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with chemorefractory disease receiving preoperative radiation therapy were identified from a retrospective multicenter cohort of consecutive patients with IBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 at 7 oncology centers in France.

RESULTS

Overall, 18 patients among the 364 patients (5%) treated for IBC had progressive disease during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These patients had aggressive tumors with lymph node involvement at diagnosis (n = 17; 94.4%), triple-negative subtype (n = 11; 61.1%), Scarff Bloom and Richardson grade 3 (n = 10; 55.6%), and high Ki67 (median, 56.0%). After preoperative radiation therapy, all patients had a complete (n = 1; 5.6%) or partial (n = 17; 94.4%) locoregional response. One patient (5.6%) experienced acute grade 3 dermatitis. Twelve (66.7%) patients underwent surgery as planned. The estimated median follow-up was 31 months. The median overall survival, disease-free survival, distant metastases-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival were 19 months, 4.5 months, 5 months, and 6 months, respectively. Ultimate locoregional control was obtained for 11 patients (61.1%), and 13 patients (72.2%) experienced metastatic progression. Triple-negative subtype (hazard ratio [HR], 15.54; P = .011) and surgery (HR, 0.23; P = .030) were significantly associated with overall survival in the univariate analysis. In multivariate analyses, the triple-negative subtype remained a significant prognostic factor (HR, 13.04; P = .021) for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative radiation therapy is a feasible approach with acceptable toxicities. It allowed surgery and ultimate locoregional control in a majority of patients. The lack of translation into better survival has been a challenge, in part owing to the metastatic propensity of patients with chemorefractory IBC, especially in the overrepresented triple-negative population in this series.

Low Rates of Local-Regional Recurrence Among Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients After Contemporary Trimodal Therapy

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) represents a rare (2-3 %) but aggressive subset of breast cancer with a historically reported 5-year overall survival rate of 50 % and a 3-year local-regional recurrence (LRR) rate of 20 %. This study aimed to evaluate long-term LRR in a contemporary cohort of non-metastatic IBC patients undergoing trimodal therapy at a single institution and identify factors associated with local and distant failure.

METHODS

The study identified 262 patients with non-metastatic IBC who received trimodal therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy, adjuvant radiation) from an institutional prospective database (2007-2019). Long-term outcomes of local-regional and distant metastasis were reported. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 52 years, and the median follow-up period was 5.1 years. In this cohort, 82 (31.3 %) patients achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast and axilla. Local-regional recurrence was observed in 18 (6.9 %) patients (11 isolated to the chest wall, 4 isolated to regional nodes, and 3 involving chest wall and ipsilateral axillary nodes). Distant metastasis was observed in 92 (35.1 %) patients. During the follow-up period, 90 deaths occurred. In the multivariate analysis, pCR was associated with improved disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.51; p = 0.001) and overall survival (HR, 0.31; 95 % CI, 0.15-0.65; p = 002).

CONCLUSIONS

During a median follow-up period longer than 5 years, the local-regional relapse rate for the IBC patients treated with contemporary trimodal therapy was 6.9%, similar to that for the non-IBC patients. After chemotherapy, surgical resection with modified radical mastectomy to negative margins and postmastectomy radiation therapy resulted in excellent long-term local-regional control.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Effects on Survival in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer

The objective of this study was to determine the survival rate and the effects of different treatments on patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). The study employed a systematic approach that included a search strategy across four databases: Embase, Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus. The results obtained were screened initially by titles and abstracts, followed by full-texts in EndNote 8 software. The next stage involved data extraction and qualitative evaluation, where the Metan command was used to estimate the pooled survival rate. A total of 28 studies with a sample size of 63,796 were finally analyzed. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates (OS) for IBC patients were found to be 52% (95% CI; 46-58%, I2: 99.42%) and 61% (95% CI; 53-69%, I2: 93.63%), respectively. The 5-year OS rates in patients with non-metastatic and metastatic IBC were 59% (95% CI; 54-63%, I2: 98.31%) and 30% (95% CI; 26-35%, I2: 50.84%), respectively. The 5-year OS rate in non-metastatic patients who underwent BCS surgery was 60% (CI 95%; 26-94%, I2: 95.13%). The overall 5- and 3-year OS rates for patients with IBC were lower than those for all types of breast cancer, and the rates were even lower in patients with metastasis. Therefore, it is recommended that healthcare workers and women at risk should be vigilant of early symptoms of IBC to prevent metastasis by seeking medical attention on time.

Breast Reconstruction Use and Impact on Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes Amongst Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients-A Systematic Review

Breast reconstruction is generally discouraged in women with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) due to concerns with recurrence and poor long-term survival. We aim to determine contemporary trends and predictors of breast reconstruction and its impact on oncologic outcomes among women with IBC. A systematic literature review for all studies published up to 15 September 2022 was conducted via MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing women diagnosed with IBC undergoing a mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction were evaluated. The initial search yielded 225 studies, of which nine retrospective cohort studies, reporting 2781 cases of breast reconstruction in 29,058 women with IBC, were included. In the past two decades, immediate reconstruction rates have doubled. Younger age, higher income (>USD 25,000), private insurance, metropolitan residence, and bilateral mastectomy were associated with immediate reconstruction. No significant difference was found in overall survival, breast cancer-specific survival or recurrence rates between women undergoing versus not undergoing (immediate or delayed) reconstruction. There is a paucity of data on delayed breast reconstruction following IBC. Immediate breast reconstruction may be a consideration for select patients with IBC, although prospective data is needed to clarify its safety.

A Comprehensive Review on Electrochemical Nano Biosensors for Precise Detection of Blood-Based Oncomarkers in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC), one of the most common and life-threatening cancers, has the highest incidence rate among women. Early diagnosis of BC oncomarkers is considered the most effective strategy for detecting and treating BC. Finding the type and stage of BC in women as soon as possible is one of the greatest ways to stop its incidence and negative effects on medical treatment. The development of biosensors for early, sensitive, and selective detection of oncomarkers has recently attracted much attention. An electrochemical nano biosensor (EN) is a very suitable option for a powerful tool for cancer diagnosis. This comprehensive review provides information about the prevalence and pathobiology of BC, recent advances in clinically available BC oncomarkers, and the most common electrochemical nano biosensors for point-of-care (POC) detection of various BC oncomarkers using nanomaterial-based signal amplification techniques.

Pretreatment Depressive Status Associated with Poor Nutrition and Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

The prevalence of pretreatment depression in breast cancer patients and its impact on nutrition and prognosis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy remain unknown. One hundred twenty-one patients with previously untreated breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were enrolled. Patients completed the Self-rating Depressive symptoms Scale (SDS) before treatment and were divided into two groups (non-depressive group and depressive group). The nutrition risk screening-2002 (NRS-2002), and nutritional and prognostic indicators, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), were collected at baseline (pretreatment) and post-treatment. One- and two-year progression-free survival (PFS) in both groups were also calculated. We found that 38.84% patients experienced pretreatment depressive symptoms. Patients in the depressive group had higher nutritional risk and lower body mass index, potassium, sodium, total cholesterol, total protein, and fasting blood glucose levels than those in pretreatment non-depressive group after NAC (all p < 0.05). And higher NLR (p = 0.039) and lower PNI level (p = 0.0021) after NAC were found in patients with pretreatment depressive status. Multivariable Cox analysis showed pretreatment depressive status (HR: 1.893; 95% CI: 1.047-3.426; p = 0.034) were a significant predictor of PFS. This study provides evidence for early identification of pretreatment depression in patients receiving NAC, which would certainly favor nutrition and survival outcome.

Complete response in the axilla and the non-triple negative subtype are favourable prognostic factors for survival outcomes in inflammatory breast cancer

AIM

To assess real-world outcomes and prognostic factors of non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer according to immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based subtype and treatment regimen.

METHODS

An institutional retrospective analysis of patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) for stage III inflammatory breast cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2018 was performed. The survival outcomes in relation to patient characteristics, tumour characteristics, treatment modality and response to NAST were analyzed.

RESULTS

225 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 90% of patients were node-positive. IHC-based subtypes: 39.1% were HR+/HER2-, 19.1% HR+/HER2+, 23.1% HR-/HER2+ and 18.7% HR-/HER2-. Treatment was multimodal: NAST (100%), surgery (94.2%) and radiotherapy (94.2%). 53.3% of patients received adjuvant endocrine therapy, 34.3% (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Tri-modality therapy was applied in 89.3% of patients. Following NAST, a pathologic complete remission (pCR) in the breast was found in 16.9%, in the axilla in 29.7% and in both the breast and axilla in 10.3% of patients. The axillary pCR rate was significantly higher in HR- subtypes. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.9, 7.2, 5.8 and 2.3 years (p < 0.001) for HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+ and HR-/HER2- subtype, respectively. On multivariate analysis, IHC-based subtype, age and axillary pCR were found as independent prognostic factors for RFS and OS. pCR rate and median OS improved over time, 5.8% vs 14.7% and 4.7 vs 10.0 years (2001-2009 vs. 2010-2018), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary pCR and the non-triple-negative IHC-based subtype are favourable prognostic factors for RFS and OS in inflammatory breast cancer. Introduction of taxanes and antiHER2 drugs contributed to improved pCR rate and OS.

Prognostic factors in inflammatory breast cancer: A single-center study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that poor prognostic indicators of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) include younger age at diagnosis, poorer tumor grade, negative estrogen receptor, lesser degree of pathological response in the breast and lymph nodes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study conducted over a period of 12 years between January 2008 and December 2019 at the medical oncology department at Habib Bourguiba University Hospital in Sfax. We included in this study women with confirmed IBC. We excluded patients with no histological evidence, those whose medical records were unusable. Data collection was done from patient files. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors of poor prognosis of this entity.

RESULTS

During a period of 12 years (2008-2019), 2879 cases of breast cancer were treated at Habib Bourguiba hospital in Sfax. 81 IBC were included. The incidence of IBC was 3%. The average age was 52.4 years (26-87 years). Invasive ductal carcinoma was the most frequent histological type (85.7%). Hormone receptor were positive in 64%. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2) was overexpressed in 35.9% of cases. The proliferation index Ki-67 was analyzed in 34 cases. It was >20% in 24 cases. Luminal A, luminal B, HER2+++, triple negative were found in 13%, 50.7%, 16% and 20% respectively. Metastases at diagnosis were found in 38%. Poor prognostic factors significantly influencing overall survival in univariate analysis were metastatic stage, high SBR grade, lymph node involvement, in particular greater than 3 nodes, negative hormone receptors, triple-negative molecular profile and occurrence of relapse.

CONCLUSION

Number of positive lymph nodes greater than 3 and the occurrence of relapse were independent prognostic factors in case of localized IBC. Metastatic stage was associated with a very poor prognosis.

CASP9 As a Prognostic Biomarker and Promising Drug Target Plays a Pivotal Role in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Background

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is one of the most rare and aggressive subtypes of primary breast cancer (BC). Our study aimed to explore hub genes related to the pathogenesis of IBC, which could be considered as novel molecular biomarkers for IBC diagnosis and prognosis. Material and Methods. Two datasets from gene expression omnibus database (GEO) were selected. Enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network for the DEGs were performed. We analyzed the prognostic values of hub genes in the Kaplan-Meier Plotter. Connectivity Map (CMap) and Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) was used to find candidate small molecules capable to reverse the gene status of IBC.

Results

157 DEGs were selected in total. We constructed the PPI network with 154 nodes interconnected by 128 interactions. The KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the DEGs were enriched in apoptosis, pathways in cancer and insulin signaling pathway. PTEN, PSMF1, PSMC6, AURKB, FZR1, CASP9, CASP6, CASP8, BAD, AKR7A2, ZNF24, SSX2IP, SIGLEC1, MS4A4A, and VSIG4 were selected as hub genes based on the high degree of connectivity. Six hub genes (PSMC6, AURKB, CASP9, BAD, ZNF24, and SSX2IP) that were significantly associated with the prognosis of breast cancer. The expression of CASP9 protein was associated with prognosis and immune cells infiltration of breast cancer. CASP9- naringenin (NGE) is expected to be the most promising candidate gene-compound interaction for the treatment of IBC.

Conclusion

Taken together, CASP9 can be used as a prognostic biomarker and a novel therapeutic target in IBC.

Contemporary Trends in Breast Reconstruction Use and Impact on Survival Among Women with Inflammatory Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction is generally discouraged in women with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Nevertheless, reconstruction rates are increasing in this population.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine contemporary trends and predictors of breast reconstruction use and its impact on mortality among IBC patients.

METHODS

Demographic, clinicopathologic, and follow-up data for women with non-metastatic IBC having mastectomy between 2004 and 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database. Rates and predictors of immediate breast reconstruction, along with survival outcomes between the breast reconstruction and no reconstruction groups were calculated. To account for selection bias, a propensity score analysis matching one reconstruction patient to three no reconstruction patients was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 4076 women with non-metastatic IBC who underwent mastectomy (388 [9.5%] with breast reconstruction and 3688 [90.5%] without) were included. The proportion of women undergoing breast reconstruction and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy increased from 6.2 to 15.3% and 12.9 to 29.6%, respectively, between 2004 and 2015. Younger age, higher annual income, metropolitan residence, and bilateral mastectomy predicted breast reconstruction use. The 10-year breast cancer-specific survival was 62.9% for women having breast reconstruction and 47.6% for women not having breast reconstruction. After propensity-matched analysis, 10-year cancer-specific survival was similar between the reconstruction (56.6%) and no reconstruction (62.2%) groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.16; p = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast reconstruction rates continue to rise among IBC patients, particularly young women and women with access to reconstruction. Breast reconstruction is not associated with inferior breast cancer-specific survival and can be an option for select patients.

Different Prognostic Values of Tumour and Nodal Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Depending on Subtypes of Inflammatory Breast Cancer, a 317 Patient-Study

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare entity with a poor prognosis. We analysed the survival outcomes of patients with nonmetastatic IBC and the prognostic value of tumour or nodal responses to assess their individual prognostic impact across IBC subtypes. This retrospective multicentre study included patients diagnosed with IBC between 2010 and 2017 to account for advances in neoadjuvant systemic therapies and modern radiotherapy at seven oncology centres in France. Three hundred and seventeen patients were included and analysed. After a median follow-up of 52 months, the 5-year DFS was lower for triple-negative (TN) (50.1% vs. 63.6%; p < 0.0001). After multivariate analyses, incomplete nodal response was the only significant prognostic factor in the triple-negative group (HR:6.06). The poor prognosis of TN-IBC was reversed in the case of nodal response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast response does not appear to be a decisive prognostic factor in patients with TN-IBC compared to lymph node response. Despite improvements in neoadjuvant treatments, IBC remains associated with a poor prognosis. In TN-IBC patients, lack of pathological complete node response was associated with poorer survival than any other group. Treatment intensification strategies are worth investigating.

Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Is There a Role for Deescalation of Surgery?

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive presentation of breast cancer, characterized by higher propensity for locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis compared with non-IBC. Because of extensive parenchymal and overlying dermal lymphatic involvement by carcinoma, IBC is unresectable at diagnosis. Trimodality therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant comprehensive chest wall and regional nodal radiotherapy) has been a well-accepted treatment algorithm for IBC. Over the last few decades, several innovations in systemic therapy have resulted in rising rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in both the affected breast and the axilla. The latter may present an opportunity for deescalation of lymph node surgery in patients with IBC, as those with an axillary pCR may be able to avoid an axillary dissection. To this end, feasibility data are necessary to address this question. There are very limited data on the safety of breast conservation of IBC; therefore, mastectomy remains the standard of care for this disease. There are also no data addressing the safety of immediate reconstruction in patients with IBC. Considering that some degree of deliberate skin-sparing to facilitate immediate breast reconstruction would be expected, given the extensive skin involvement by disease at diagnosis, the safest oncologic strategy to breast reconstruction in IBC would be the delayed approach.

Radiotherapy in the Management of Non-Metastatic Inflammatory Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Observational Study

(1) Background: Inflammatory breast cancers (IBC) are characterized by a poor prognosis. This retrospective study aims to describe the clinical outcomes of non-metastatic IBC patients treated with a multidisciplinary approach with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. (2) Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all women patients diagnosed with non-metastatic IBC between January 2010 and January 2018 at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional free survival (LRRFS) were calculated from the time of diagnosis. Prognostic factors for patient survival were analyzed based on univariate and multivariate regressions. (3) Results: We identified 113 patients with a median age of 51 years. 79.7% had node-positive tumors; triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) represented 34.6% of the cases. A large majority of patients (91.2%) received adjuvant post-mastectomy while ten patients (8.8%) received preoperative radiotherapy. Non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) was observed in 67.3% of patients. Radiotherapy delivered a median dose of 50 Gy to the breast or the chest wall in 25 fractions. With a median follow-up of 54 months, 5-year OS, DFS and LRRFS were 78% (CI: 70.1-86.8%), 68.1% (59.6-77.7%), and 85.2% (78.4-92.7%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, non-pCR was an adverse prognosis factor for OS, DFS, and LRRFS; pre-operative radiotherapy was an adverse prognosis factor for OS and DFS. Radiation-related adverse events were limited to acute skin toxicity (22% of Grade 2 and 2% of grade 3 dermatitis); no late radiation-induced toxicity was reported. (4) Conclusions: High locoregional control could be achieved with multidisciplinary management of non-metastatic IBC, suggesting the anti-tumor efficacy of radiotherapy in this rare but pejorative clinicopathological presentation. While comparing favorably with historical cohorts, OS and DFS could be potentially improved in the future with the use of new systemic treatments, such as PARP-inhibitors or immunotherapy.

Circulating PIK3CA mutation detection at diagnosis in non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer patients

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive BC subtype with poor outcomes. A targetable somatic PIK3CA mutation is reported in 30% of IBC, allowing for treatment by PI3Kα-specific inhibitors, such as alpelisib. The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection rate of circulating PIK3CA mutation in locally-advanced IBC (LAIBC) patients harbouring a PIK3CA mutation on initial biopsy. This monocentric retrospective study was based on available stored plasma samples and tumour biopsies at diagnosis from all LAIBC patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) between 2008 and 2018 at the Centre Henri Becquerel. PIK3CA mutations (E542K, E545K, H1047R/L) were assessed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in plasma samples and tumoral tissue at diagnosis. A total of 55 patients were included. Overall, 14/55 patients (25%) had a PIK3CA mutation identified on baseline biopsy (H1047R = 8; H1047L = 3; E545K = 2; E542K = 1). Among them, 11 (79%) patients had enough DNA for circulating DNA analyses, and corresponding circulating PIK3CA mutations were found in 6/11 (55%). Among the 41 patients without PIK3CA mutations on biopsy, 32 (78%) had enough DNA for circulating DNA analysis, and no circulating PIK3CA mutation was identified. Our results revealed no prognostic or predictive value of PIK3CA mutations at the diagnosis of non-metastatic IBC but highlighted the prognostic value of the cfDNA rate at diagnosis. Our study showed that a corresponding circulating PIK3CA mutation was identified in 55% of LAIBC patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumours, while no circulating mutation was found among patients with PI3KCA wild-type tumours.

Differential effects of CD20+ B cells and PD-L1+ immune cells on pathologic complete response and outcome: comparison between inflammatory breast cancer and locally advanced breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

This study evaluated epidemiologic and immune factors associated with pathologic complete response (pCR), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes in inflammatory (IBC) and locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients.

METHODS

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and CD20+ B-cell frequencies (CD20+), and PD-L1 expression on tumor (PD-L1+carcinoma cells) and immune (PD-L1+TILs) cells were analyzed by immunohistochemistry along with clinicopathologic factors as modifiers of pCR and outcomes in 221 IBC and 162 LABC patients. Analysis included Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

IBC and LABC display similar levels of TILs, CD20+, and combined CD20+ and PD-L1+TILs (CD20+PD-L1+TILs), while LABC contained more PD-L1+TILs and PD-L1+ carcinoma cells. Absence of lymphovascular involvement, high TILs, PD-L1+ carcinoma cells, and combined CD20+ and PD-L1+ carcinoma cells correlated with pCR in IBC and LABC patients. High PD-L1+TILs correlated with pCR only in LABC; less lymph node involvement at diagnosis, CD20+ and CD20+PD-L1+TILs correlated with pCR only in IBC (P < 0.04, all comparisons). Achievement of pCR in IBC and LABC patients correlated with BCSS and DFS (P < 0.02). In multivariate analyses, pCR remained an independent prognostic factor of improved DFS in IBC and LABC patients, but of BCSS in only LABC. CD20+PD-L1+TILs remained an independent prognostic factor of improved DFS and BCSS only in IBC.

CONCLUSION

CD20+PD-L1+TILs are an independent prognostic biomarker of improved outcomes in IBC, but not LABC. Selecting IBC patients by CD20 and PD-L1 status could stratify patients and potentially identify those in whom activating CD20 agents and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy could be explored.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy May Prevent Unnecessary Axillary Dissection in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer Who Respond to Systemic Treatment

Background and Objectives

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive breast cancer treated up-front with systemic treatment. Both breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are controversial issues in the management of IBC. In this study, we aimed to assess the feasibility of SLNB in pathologically proven node-positive IBC patients.

Methods

All patients with a histopathological diagnosis of IBC and biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes underwent systemic treatment. Patients with a complete clinical response in the axilla who underwent SLNB followed by standard axillary dissection were analyzed.

Results

The study consisted of 25 female patients. The identification rate (IR) and the false negativity rate (FNR) were 17/25 and 2/10, respectively. Overall, 9/25 and 7/25 of patients had a complete pathological response (pCR) in the breast and axilla after systemic treatment, respectively. Although the pCR in the axilla was 2/4 in nonluminal HER2-positive patients, the highest IR 4/4 and the lowest FNR 0/2 were determined in these patients. In triple-negative patients, however, the IR was 2/4 and the FNR was found to be 0/2.

Conclusions

SLNB may be considered in selected axilla-downstaged IBC patients including patients with a pCR with HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors. Axillary dissection may be, therefore, omitted in those with negative SLNs.

Inflammatory Breast Cancer at the Extremes of Age

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare breast malignancy with poor outcomes compared with non-IBC. Age-related differences in tumor biology, treatment, and clinical outcomes have been described in non-IBC. This study evaluated age-related differences in IBC.

METHODS

From an institutional prospective database, patients with an IBC diagnosed from 2010 to 2019 were identified. Age was categorized as 40 years or younger, 41 to 64 years, and 65 years or older. Demographics, clinicopathologic features, and treatment received were compared. Recurrence and survival outcomes were analyzed using the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of 523 IBC patients, 113 (21.6%) were age 40 years or younger, and 72 (13.8%) were age 65 years or older. The groups did not differ statistically by race/ethnicity, N stage, clinical stage, or tumor subtype. The younger patients included a higher proportion of Hispanic and Asian patients, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and clinical N2/N3. Trimodality therapy was received by 92% of the stage 3 patients, with no difference in pathologic complete response (pCR) by age (23.3% vs 28.6%; p = 0.46). During a median follow-up period of 40 months, 17% of the patients experienced locoregional recurrence and 42.8% had distant metastasis. No difference in 3-year recurrence-free survival (57.9% vs 42.6% vs 54%; p = 0.42, log rank) or overall survival (OS) (75.6% vs 77.1% vs 64.4%; p = 0.31, log rank) by age was observed, and no difference in OS by age in de novo stage 4 disease was observed. In the multivariate analysis, worse OS was associated with TNBC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-3.05) and no pCR (HR, 4.45; 95% CI, 2.16-9.18).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were observed in demographics, treatment patterns, or clinical outcomes for IBC patients age 40 years or younger compared with those age 65 years or older treated by a specialized multidisciplinary team. These findings do not support age-related treatment de-escalation in IBC.

A macrolide from Streptomyces sp. modulates apoptosis and autophagy through Mcl-1 downregulation in human breast cancer cells

Secondary metabolites in marine organisms exhibit various pharmacological activities against diseases, such as cancer. In this study, the anti-proliferative effect of JBIR-100, a macrolide isolated from Streptomyces sp., was investigated in breast cancer cells. Cell growth was inhibited in response to JBIR-100 treatment concentration- and time-dependently in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. JBIR-100 caused apoptosis, as verified by caspase activation and the cleavage of PARP. Western blotting revealed that JBIR-100 modulated the expression of Akt/NF-κB signaling components and Bcl-2 family members. Overexpression of Mcl-1 partially rescued MCF-7 cells from JBIR-100-induced cytotoxicity. In addition, transmission electron microscopy analyses, confocal analysis, and western blot assay indicated that JBIR-100 inhibited autophagy in MCF-7 cells. Exposure to the autophagy inhibitor did not synergize JBIR-100-induced apoptosis. In summary, our results suggested that JBIR-100 may be potentially used for breast cancer therapy.

New Treatment Strategies for the Inflammatory Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) remains the most aggressive type of breast cancer. During the past decade, enormous progress has been made to refine diagnostic criteria and establish multimodality treatment strategies as keys for the improvement of survival outcomes. Multiple genomic studies enabled a better understanding of underlying tumor biology, which is responsible for the complex and aggressive nature of IBC. Despite these important achievements, outcomes for this subgroup of patients remain unsatisfactory compared to locally advanced non-IBC counterparts. Global efforts are now focused on identifying novel strategies that will improve treatment response, prolong survival for metastatic patients, achieve superior local control, and possibly increase the cure rate for locally advanced disease. Genomic technologies constitute the most important tool that will support future clinical progress. Gene-expressing profiling of the tumor tissue and liquid biopsy are important parts of the everyday clinical practice aiming to guide treatment decisions by providing information on tumor molecular drivers or primary and acquired resistance to treatment. The International IBC expert panel and IBC International Consortium made a tremendous effort to define IBC as a distinct entity of BC, and they will continue to lead and support the research for this rare and very aggressive disease. Finally, a uniform platform is now required to develop and lead large, multi-arm, proof-of-concept clinical trials that perform rapid, focused, and cost-effective evaluations of potential novel therapeutics in IBC.

Pathological complete response of adding targeted therapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer: A systematic review

Background

The current use of targeted therapy plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is based on data extrapolated from studies in non-IBC. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus targeted therapy results in a higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rate than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with IBC.

Method and findings

This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO register with registration number CRD42018089465. We searched MEDLINE & PubMed, EMBASE, and EBSCO from December 1998 through July 2020. All English-language clinical studies, both randomized and non-randomized, that evaluated neoadjuvant systemic treatment with or without targeted therapy before definitive surgery and reported the pCR results of IBC patients. First reviewer extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Second reviewer confirmed the accuracy. Studies were divided into 3 groups according to systemic treatment: chemotherapy with targeted therapy, chemotherapy alone, and high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support (HSCS). Of 995 screened studies, 23 with 1,269 IBC patients met the inclusion criteria. For each of the 3 groups of studies, we computed a weighted average of the pCR rates across all studies with confidence interval (CI). The weighted averages (95% CIs) were as follows: chemotherapy with targeted therapy, 31.6% (26.4%-37.3%), chemotherapy alone, 13.0% (10.3%-16.2%), and high-dose chemotherapy with HSCS, 23.0% (18.7%-27.7%). The high pCR by targeted therapy group came from anti-HER2 therapy, 54.4% (44.3%-64.0%). Key limitations of this study included no randomized clinical studies that included only IBC patients.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus targeted therapy is more effective than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for IBC patients. These findings support current IBC standard practice in particular the use of anti-HER2 targeted therapy.

Update on systemic treatment for newly diagnosed inflammatory breast cancer

Background

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive disease, accounting for 2-4% of new cases of breast cancer. Owing to its aggressive nature, IBC represent approximately 8-10% of breast cancer deaths. Management of IBC requires a multidisciplinary team for decision-making involving a composite of systemic treatment, surgery, and radiation, or "Trimodality Treatment." Because of the rarity of the disease, systemic therapy of IBC traditionally has been extrapolated from non-IBC clinical trials.

Aim of Review

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the development of systemic treatment of IBC from the past to the present by focusing on IBC clinical trials, including chemotherapy and targeted therapies.

Key Scientific Concepts of Review

We discuss their effects on pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes, the predictive markers, and the adverse events of these therapies. Further, we summarized the current standard treatment stratified by molecular subtypes based on clinical data. Finally, we discuss the future trend of systemic therapy, including immunotherapy and ongoing IBC clinical trials.

Radiotherapy-induced malignancies in breast cancer patients with TP53 pathogenic germline variants (Li-Fraumeni syndrome)

The risk of radiotherapy-induced malignancies (RIMs) is a concern when treating Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) or Li-Fraumeni Like (LFL) patients. However, the type of TP53 pathogenic germline variant may possibly influence this risk. TP53 p.R337H mutation is particularly prevalent in Brazil. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with pathogenic TP53 variants treated for localized breast cancer in a Brazilian cohort. We evaluated retrospectively a cohort of patients with germline TP53 pathogenic variants treated for localized breast cancer between December 1999 and October 2017. All patients were followed by the Hereditary Cancer Group of an academic cancer center. Our primary objective was to evaluate the occurrence of RIMs after adjuvant radiotherapy. Sixteen patients were evaluated; 10 (62.5%) had a germline TP53 p.R337H pathogenic variant. Median age was 39.8 years. Thirteen patients had invasive ductal carcinoma: 8 (61.5%) were hormone receptor-positive; 6 (46.1%), human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-amplified. Three patients had ductal carcinoma in situ. Most patients (N = 12/16, 75%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, 2 patients (2/12, 16.6%) had RIMs. One had a fibrosarcoma and the other, a low-grade leiomyosarcoma. In the group treated with radiotherapy, one distant recurrence was diagnosed (1/12), and no loco-regional recurrence occurred. Among 4 patients who did not receive radiotherapy, 2 presented with loco-regional recurrence. In this cohort of patients with LFS enriched in TP53 p.R337H pathogenic variant, the incidence of RIMs after treatment of localized breast cancer was lower than previous literature. Nevertheless, rates of RIMs were still alarming. Early molecular diagnosis and careful evaluation of treatment risks and benefits are essential for these patients.

Comparison of survival in non-metastatic inflammatory and other T4 breast cancers: a SEER population-based analysis

Background

Previous studies have reported poor survival rates in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients than non-inflammatory local advanced breast cancer (non-IBC) patients. However, until now, the survival rate of IBC and other T4 non-IBC (T4-non-IBC) patients remains unexplored.

Methods

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched to identify cases with confirmed non-metastatic IBC and T4-non-IBC who had received surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy between 2010 and 2015. IBC was defined as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition. Breast Cancer-Specific Survival (BCSS) was estimated by plotting the Kaplan-Meier curve and compared across groups by using the log-rank test. Cox model was constructed to determine the association between IBC and BCSS after adjusting for age, race, stage of disease, tumor grade and surgery type.

Results

Out of a total of 1986 patients, 37.1% had IBC and mean age was 56.6 ± 12.4. After a median follow-up time of 28 months, 3-year BCSS rate for IBC and T4-non-IBC patients was 81.4 and 81.9%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.398). The 3-year BCSS rate in HR−/HER2+ cohort was higher for IBC patients than T4-non-IBC patients (89.5% vs. 80.8%; log-rank p = 0.028), and in HR−/HER2- cohort it was significantly lower for IBC patients than T4-non-IBC patients (57.4% vs. 67.5%; log-rank p = 0.010). However, it was identical between IBC and T4-non-IBC patients in both HR+/HER2- (85.0% vs. 85.3%; log-rank p = 0.567) and HR+/HER2+ (93.6% vs. 91.0%, log-rank p = 0.510) cohorts. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, we observed that IBC is a significant independent predictor for survival of HR−/HER2+ cohort (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.442; 95% CI: 0.216–0.902; P = 0.025) and HR−/HER2- cohort (HR = 1.738; 95% CI: 1.192–2.534; P = 0.004).

Conclusions

Patients with IBC and T4-non-IBC had a similar BCSS in the era of modern systemic treatment. In IBC patients, the HR−/HER2+ subtype is associated with a better outcome, and HR−/HER2- subtype is associated with poorer outcomes as compared to the T4-non-IBC patients.

Locoregional Management of Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Purpose of Review

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a biologically aggressive subtype with a high risk for rapid local progression and early distant metastasis. We review the updated data for optimal locoregional management of IBC, including areas of active controversy.

Recent Findings

Advancements in tri-modality therapies have improved survival among IBC patients in recent years; however, the risk of locoregional and distant recurrence remains high, particularly in triple-negative IBC. Data to support de-escalation of surgery or radiotherapy is limited, and the recommended treatment approach for non-metastatic IBC remains preoperative systemic therapy (PST), modified radical mastectomy (MRM), and adjuvant radiotherapy in all patients. For patients with de novo metastatic disease, locoregional intervention may be appropriate.

Summary

Optimal locoregional management of IBC remains PST followed by MRM and adjuvant radiotherapy. With increasingly effective systemic therapies, research to identify a subset of patients who may benefit from de-escalation of locoregional therapies is warranted.

Multi-center investigation of the clinical and pathological characteristics of inflammatory breast cancer based on Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrs-007)

Background

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive type of cancer with poor prognosis and outcomes. This study aimed to investigate clinicopathological features, molecular characteristics, and treatments among Chinese patients diagnosed with IBC.

Methods

We collected data of 95 patients with IBC who were treated by members of the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery, from January 2017 to December 2018. The data, including demographic characteristics, pathological findings, surgical methods, systemic treatment plans, and follow-up, were obtained using a uniform electronic questionnaire. The clinicopathological features of different molecular types in patients without distant metastases were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis (H) test followed by post hoc analyses.

Results

Lymph node metastasis was noted in 75.8% of all patients, while distant metastasis was noted in 21.4%. Pathological findings indicated invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas in 86.8% and 5.3% of cases, respectively. Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) (41.5%) and HR−/HER2+ (20.1%) were the most common biologic subtypes, followed by HR+/HER2+ (19.1%) and HR−/HER2− (19.1%). Stage III IBC was treated via pre-operative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 87.7% of the cases, predominantly using anthracycline and taxanes. A total of 91.9% of patients underwent surgical treatment. Among them, 77.0% of the patients underwent modified radical mastectomy, 8.1% of whom also underwent immediate breast reconstruction. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that the efficacy of chemotherapy significantly differed among those with HR+/HER2− and HR−/HER2− tumors (adjusted P = 0.008), and Ki-67 expression significantly differed in HR−/HER2+ and HR+/HER2+ molecular subtypes (adjusted P = 0.008).

Conclusion

Our study provides novel insight into clinicopathological characteristics and treatment status among patients with IBC in China, and might provide a direction and basis for further studies.

Trial registration

chictr.org.cn, No. ChiCTR1900027179; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=45030

Early response and pathological complete remission in Breast Cancer with different molecular subtypes: a retrospective single center analysis

Purpose: To evaluate the association of clinical early response and pathological complete remission (pCR) in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes.

Materials and methods: Breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) with clinical early response assessment from October 2008 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical early response was defined as tumor size decreasing ≥30% evaluated by ultrasound after two cycles of NAT. Chi-square test was used to compare the pCR rates between the responder and non-responder groups with different molecular subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with the pCR.

Results: A total of 328 patients were included: 100 responders and 228 non-responders. The progesterone receptor (PR) expression was an independent factor associated with clinical early response (OR=2.39, 95%CI=1.41-4.05, P=0.001). The pCR rate of breast was 50.0% for responders and 18.0% for non-responders (P<0.001). Regarding different molecular subtypes, responders had higher pCR rates than non-responders for patients with HER2 overexpression (OR=10.66, 95%CI=2.18-52.15, P=0.001), triple negative (OR=3.29, 95%CI=1.23-8.84, P=0.016) and Luminal (HER2-) subtypes (OR=8.58, 95%CI=3.05-24.10, P<0.001) respectively. Moreover, pCR rate can be achieved as high as 88.2% in HER2 overexpression patients with early clinical response, which was significantly higher than patients without early response (41.3%, P=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that clinical early response was an independent factor associated with the pCR rate (OR=4.87, 95%CI=2.72-8.72, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Early response was significantly associated with a higher pCR rate in breast cancer patients receiving NAT, especially for patients with HER2 overexpression subtype, which warrants further clinical evaluation.

Pathologic response as predictor of recurrence, metastasis, and survival in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and total mastectomy

To determine easy-to-use predictors of overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM) in breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and total mastectomy (TM), we used the pathologic response (PR) of primary breast diseases (T stages), nodal diseases (N stages), and combined primary and nodal diseases (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stages) based on existing clinical and pathologic reports as predictors. We enrolled patients with IDC who received NACT followed by TM. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) of PR; other independent predictors were controlled for or stratified in the analysis. We analyzed 3654 IDC patients (1031, 1215, 1003, and 405 patients with clinical stages IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC, respectively) receiving NACT and TM. After multivariate Cox regression analyses, the adjusted HRs (aHRs) (95% CI) for all-cause mortality, LRR, and DM were noted to be 0.21 (0.13-0.34), 0.19 (0.08-0.48), and 0.33 (0.23-0.47), respectively, for pCR; 0.56 (0.48-0.65), 0.67 (0.51-0.89), and 0.61 (0.52-0.70), respectively, for AJCC downstaging; and 1.85 (1.56-2.18), 1.17 (0.84-1.62), and 1.61 (1.36-1.90), respectively, for AJCC upstaging. The PR parameters used in the study are easily applied because they are based on existing staging records, and they can strongly predict OS, LRR, and DM in IDC patients receiving NACT and TM, regardless of clinical stage. The results can be used to guide adjuvant treatment.

Induction of heparanase via IL-10 correlates with a high infiltration of CD163+ M2-type tumor-associated macrophages in inflammatory breast carcinomas

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive and lethal form of breast cancer, characterized by a high infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages and poor prognosis. To identify new biomarkers and to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying IBC pathogenesis, we investigated the expression pattern of heparanase (HPSE) and its activator cathepsin L (CTSL). First, we quantitated the HPSE and CTSL mRNA levels in a cohort of breast cancer patients after curative surgery (20 IBC and 20-non-IBC). We discovered that both HPSE and CTSL mRNA levels were significantly induced in IBC tissue vis-à-vis non-IBC patients (p <0 .05 and p <0 .001, respectively). According to the molecular subtypes, HPSE mRNA levels were significantly higher in carcinoma tissues of triple negative (TN)-IBC as compared to TN-non-IBC (p <0 .05). Mechanistically, we discovered that pharmacological inhibition of HPSE activity resulted in a significant reduction of invasiveness in the IBC SUM149 cell line. Moreover, siRNA-mediated HPSE knockdown significantly downregulated the expression of the metastasis-related gene MMP2 and the cancer stem cell marker CD44. We also found that IBC tumors revealed robust heparanase immune-reactivity and CD163+ M2-type tumor-associated macrophages, with a positive correlation of both markers. Moreover, the secretome of axillary tributaries blood IBC CD14+ monocytes and the cytokine IL-10 significantly upregulated HPSE mRNA and protein expression in SUM149 cells. Intriguingly, massively elevated IL-10 mRNA expression with a trend of positive correlation with HPSE mRNA expression was detected in carcinoma tissue of IBC. Our findings highlight a possible role played by CD14+ monocytes and CD163+ M2-type tumor-associated macrophages in regulating HPSE expression possibly via IL-10. Overall, we suggest that heparanase, cathepsin L and CD14+ monocytes-derived IL-10 may play an important role in the pathogenesis of IBC and their targeting could have therapeutic implications.

Reliability of MRI tumor size measurements for minimal invasive treatment selection in small breast cancers

INTRODUCTION

Due to the shift towards minimal invasive treatment, accurate tumor size estimation is essential for small breast cancers. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of MRI-based tumor size measurements with respect to clinical, histological and radiomics characteristics in small invasive or in situ carcinomas of the breast to select patients for minimal invasive therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive cases of cT1 invasive breast carcinomas that underwent pre-operative MRI, treated in two hospitals between 2005 and 2016, were identified retrospectively from the Dutch cancer registry and cross-correlated with local databases. Concordance between MRI-based measurements and final pathological size was analyzed. The influence of clinical, histological and radiomics characteristics on the accuracy of MRI size measurements were analyzed.

RESULTS

Analysis included 343 cT1 breast carcinomas in 336 patients (mean age, 55 years; range, 25-81 years). Overall correlation of MRI measurements with pathology was moderately strong (ρ = 0.530, P < 0.001), in 42 cases (12.2%) MRI underestimated the size with more than 5 mm. Underestimation occurs more often in grade 2 and grade 3 disease than in low grade invasive cancers. In DCIS the frequency of underestimation is higher than in invasive breast cancer. Unfortunately, none of the patient, imaging or biopsy characteristics appeared predictive for underestimation.

CONCLUSION

Size measurements of small breast cancers on breast MRI are within 5 mm of pathological size in 88% of patients. Nevertheless, underestimation cannot be adequately predicted, particularly for grade 2 and grade 3 tumors, which may hinder patient selection for minimal invasive therapy.