1
|
Untch M, Pérol D, Mayer EL, Cortes J, Nusch A, Cameron D, Barrios C, Delea T, Danyliv A, Mishra N, Gupta R, Pathak P, Fasching PA. Disease-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: A correlation analysis. Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:113977. [PMID: 38460476 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overall survival (OS) is a universally accepted measure of clinical benefit; however, prolonged follow-up is needed to observe sufficient events. Disease-free survival (DFS) has been widely adopted as a primary endpoint for early breast cancer (EBC) trials, as follow-up is comparatively shorter. Here, we present an analysis evaluating DFS as a surrogate for OS for adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) EBC. METHODS A systematic literature review which included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ≥80% of adult patients with HR+/HER2- EBC was conducted. The RCTs evaluated various systemic therapeutic categories; key inclusion criteria included reporting of DFS and OS hazard ratios (HRs) and mature OS data. Spearman rank correlation and weighted linear regression analyses evaluated DFS and OS HR correlation. A scenario analysis tested base-case analysis robustness, and a parallel analysis using patient-level data was conducted. RESULTS The base case (N = 14 RCTs) showed an unweighted Spearman coefficient of 0.81 between OS and DFS (weighted: 0.81), with 84% of the variability in OS explained by DFS differences (R2 from weighted regression). The surrogate threshold effect (Burzykowski T, Buyse M. Pharm Stat. 2006;5:173-186) was 0.82 for DFS/OS HR. Scenario analysis (n = 9 RCTs), which excluded chemotherapy trials, and patient-level analysis using FACE trial data were consistent with the base-case analysis. CONCLUSIONS These analyses support DFS as a reliable surrogate endpoint for OS in adjuvant HR+/HER2- EBC trials. Using DFS as a surrogate measure will permit timelier access to novel treatments for patients with HR+/HER2- EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Untch
- Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Erica L Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Grupo Quiron, Madrid & Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arnd Nusch
- Practice for Hematology and Internal Oncology, Velbert, Germany
| | - David Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Carlos Barrios
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Rhea Gupta
- Novartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad, India
| | - Purnima Pathak
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Peter A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bania A, Adamou A, Saloustros E. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in European Breast Cancer Clinical Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1726. [PMID: 38730678 PMCID: PMC11082959 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most prevalent female cancer worldwide with known correlations between the race and tumor characteristics of the patients and prognosis. International and US-based studies, however, have reported a disproportionate representation of Black and Hispanic patients in clinical trials. This is the first study assessing race and ethnicity reporting trends and inclusion in European breast cancer trials. The PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched for trials on breast cancer treatment conducted exclusively in Europe between 2010 and 2022. Of the 97 identified trials, race was reported in 10.31%. Multinational participation, but not the study size or trial phase, was significantly associated with higher race reporting trends. These 10 trials featured a White-predominant population, with 1.08% Asian and 0.88% Black patients included. The acquisition of the race and ethnicity data of patients in European trials is lower compared to the U.S. or worldwide studies and does not permit extensive analysis of minority participation. In a limited analysis, the low rates of minority participation are concerning, based on population-based data on minorities in select European countries. These observations should encourage race reporting practices in European breast cancer trials and adequate minority participation to support the generalizability of the results of the studies and promote healthcare equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelina Bania
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece;
| | - Antonis Adamou
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany;
| | - Emmanouil Saloustros
- Division of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kotsifaki A, Alevizopoulos N, Dimopoulou V, Armakolas A. Unveiling the Immune Microenvironment's Role in Breast Cancer: A Glimpse into Promising Frontiers. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:15332. [PMID: 37895012 PMCID: PMC10607694 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242015332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC), one of the most widespread and devastating diseases affecting women worldwide, presents a significant public health challenge. This review explores the emerging frontiers of research focused on deciphering the intricate interplay between BC cells and the immune microenvironment. Understanding the role of the immune system in BC is critical as it holds promise for novel therapeutic approaches and precision medicine strategies. This review delves into the current literature regarding the immune microenvironment's contribution to BC initiation, progression, and metastasis. It examines the complex mechanisms by which BC cells interact with various immune cell populations, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Furthermore, this review highlights the impact of immune-related factors, such as cytokines and immune checkpoint molecules. Additionally, this comprehensive analysis sheds light on the potential biomarkers associated with the immune response in BC, enabling early diagnosis and prognostic assessment. The therapeutic implications of targeting the immune microenvironment are also explored, encompassing immunotherapeutic strategies and combination therapies to enhance treatment efficacy. The significance of this review lies in its potential to pave the way for novel therapeutic interventions, providing clinicians and researchers with essential knowledge to design targeted and personalized treatment regimens for BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Athanasios Armakolas
- Physiology Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (A.K.); (N.A.); (V.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martín M, Carrasco E, Rodríguez-Lescure Á, Andrés R, Servitja S, Antón A, Ruiz-Borrego M, Bermejo B, Guerrero Á, Ramos M, Santaballa A, Muñoz M, Cruz J, Lopez-Tarruella S, Chacón JI, Álvarez I, Martínez P, Miralles JJ, Polonio Ó, Jara C, Aguiar-Bujanda D. Long-term outcomes of high-risk HR-positive and HER2-negative early breast cancer patients from GEICAM adjuvant studies and El Álamo IV registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023:10.1007/s10549-023-07002-1. [PMID: 37338729 PMCID: PMC10361852 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07002-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The monarchE trial showed that the addition of abemaciclib improves efficacy in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). We analyzed the long-term outcomes of a population similar to the monarchE trial to put into context the potential benefit of abemaciclib. METHODS HR-positive/HER2-negative EBC patients eligible for the monarchE study were selected from 3 adjuvant clinical trials and a breast cancer registry. Patients with ≥ 4 positive axillary lymph nodes (N +) or 1-3 N + with tumor size ≥ 5 cm and/or histologic grade 3 and/or Ki67 ≥ 20%, who had undergone surgery with curative intent and had received anthracyclines ± taxanes and endocrine therapy in the neoadjuvant and /or adjuvant setting were included. We performed analysis of Invasive Disease-Free Survival (iDFS), Distant Disease-Free Survival (dDFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 5 and 10 years, as well as yearly (up to 10) of Invasive Relapse Rate (IRR), Distant Relapse Rate (DRR) and Death Rate (DR). RESULTS A total of 1,617 patients were analyzed from the GEICAM-9906 (312), GEICAM-2003-10 (210), and GEICAM-2006-10 (160) trials plus 935 from El Álamo IV. With a median follow-up of 10.1 years, the 5 and 10 years iDFS rates were 75.2% and 57.0%, respectively. The dDFS and OS rates at 5 years were 77.4% and 88.8% and the respective figures at 10 years were 59.7% and 70.9%. CONCLUSIONS This data points out the need for new therapies for those patients. A longer follow-up of the monarchE study to see the real final benefit with abemaciclib is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinTrials.gov: GEICAM/9906: NCT00129922; GEICAM/ 2003-10: NCT00129935 and GEICAM/ 2006-10: NCT00543127.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Martín
- Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Eva Carrasco
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Raquel Andrés
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Sonia Servitja
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Antón
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Universidad de Zaragoza, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IISA), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Manuel Ruiz-Borrego
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Begoña Bermejo
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA. Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ángel Guerrero
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Manuel Ramos
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Centro Oncológico de Galicia, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Ana Santaballa
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Montserrat Muñoz
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology and Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josefina Cruz
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Sara Lopez-Tarruella
- Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose I Chacón
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Isabel Álvarez
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Purificación Martínez
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Spain
| | | | | | - Carlos Jara
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - David Aguiar-Bujanda
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Müller V, Fasching PA, Nabieva N, Fehm TN, Thill M, Schmidt M, Kühn T, Banys-Paluchowski M, Belleville E, Juhasz-Böss I, Untch M, Kolberg HC, Harbeck N, Aktas B, Stickeler E, Kreuzeder J, Hartkopf AD, Janni W, Ditsch N. Systemic Therapy of Premenopausal Patients with Early Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer - Controversies and Standards in Healthcare. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:673-685. [PMID: 37614683 PMCID: PMC10442909 DOI: 10.1055/a-2073-1887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients with existing ovarian function, there are some special aspects to adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR pos./HER2 neg.) breast cancer. Treatment options include tamoxifen with or without a GnRH analog, and aromatase inhibitors with a GnRH analog. Furthermore, ovarian function is affected by previous chemotherapy. Both aromatase inhibitors (+GnRH analogs) and GnRH analogs in combination with tamoxifen are supposed to be indicated for patients at increased risk of recurrence. However, national and international guidelines and therapy recommendations do not provide a clear definition of intermediate or high risk; as a result, therapy decisions are often made for each patient on an individual basis. This is also reflected in the considerable variability at national and international levels, e.g., with regard to the use of aromatase inhibitors + GnRH analogs. This review summarizes the data on completed studies (e.g., SOFT, TEXT, EBCTCG meta-analyses) and the current multigene testing studies (TailorX, RxPonder, ADAPT), discusses the rationale for current studies (e.g., CLEAR-B), and looks ahead to future questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | | | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | | | | | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Skafida E, Andrikopoulou A, Terpos E, Markellos C, Moustafa S, Pectasides D, Dimopoulos MA, Zagouri F, Vassilopoulos D. Impact of CDK4/6 Inhibitors on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Musculoskeletal Syndrome (AIMSS) in the Adjuvant Setting. Breast J 2023; 2023:3614296. [PMID: 37293258 PMCID: PMC10247331 DOI: 10.1155/2023/3614296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the mainstay of treatment in hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. Even though it is considered to be a well-tolerated therapy, AI-induced musculoskeletal symptoms are common and may be accused for treatment discontinuation. Recently, selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors changed the therapeutic setting, and currently, ribociclib, palbociclib, and abemaciclib are all approved in combination with nonsteroidal AIs in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This systematic review aims to identify the frequency of aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS) in the adjuvant setting in patients under AI monotherapy compared to patients under combination therapy with AIs and CDK4/6 inhibitors and demonstrate the underlying mechanism of action. Methods This study was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The literature search and data extraction from all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were done by two independent investigators. Eligible articles were identified by a search of MEDLINE and ClinicalTrial.gov database concerning the period 2000/01/01-2021/05/01. Results Arthralgia was reported in 13.2 to 68.7% of patients receiving AIs for early-stage breast cancer, while arthralgia induced by CDK4/6 inhibitors occurred in a much lower rate [20.5-41.2%]. Bone pain (5-28.7% vs. 2.2-17.2%), back pain (2-13.4% vs. 8-11.2%), and arthritis (3.6-33.6% vs. 0.32%) were reported less frequently in patients receiving the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with ET. Conclusions CDK4/6 inhibitors might have a protective effect against joint inflammation and arthralgia occurrence. Further studies are warranted to investigate arthralgia incidence in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efthymia Skafida
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Markellos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Savvina Moustafa
- Clinical Immunology-Rheumatology Unit, 2nd Department of Medicine and Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Vassilopoulos
- Clinical Immunology-Rheumatology Unit, 2nd Department of Medicine and Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lüftner D, Lux MP, Fehm TN, Welslau M, Müller V, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Janni W, Thomssen C, Witzel I, Beierlein M, Belleville E, Untch M, Thill M, Ditsch N, Aktas B, Banys-Paluchowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Wöckel A, Kolberg HC, Harbeck N, Stickeler E, Tesch H, Hartkopf AD. Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 6 - Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:299-309. [PMID: 36908287 PMCID: PMC9998183 DOI: 10.1055/a-2018-9184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Large-scale study programs on CDK4/6 inhibitors, targeted therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates launched in recent years have yielded results from current studies which are now being published in journals and presented at international conferences. In this context, new results are available from the major CDK4/6 inhibitor studies. Also, an increasing amount of data is being published from large-scale genomic studies on efficacy and resistance mechanisms in patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. These results now form the basis for further research plans to investigate combination therapies and treatment sequencing. Based on the latest published results, sacituzumab govitecan is now available as a second antibody-drug conjugate; this brings an advantage in terms of overall survival for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HRpos)/HER2-negative (HER2neg) breast cancer. In this review article, we summarize the latest developments and place them in context according to the current status of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow; Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Milena Beierlein
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Garcia-Fructuoso I, Gomez-Bravo R, Schettini F. Integrating new oral selective oestrogen receptor degraders in the breast cancer treatment. Curr Opin Oncol 2022; 34:635-642. [PMID: 36000362 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Oral SERDs are under extensive development to overcome fulvestrant main limitations, including intramuscular-only formulation and poor performance in early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer. This review summarizes the most relevant evidence published so far and envisions the potential integration of oral SERDs in the therapeutic algorithm of HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). RECENT FINDINGS Amcenestrant and giredestrant, two of the most promising oral SERDs, recently failed to show a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in pivotal trials. Conversely, elacestrant demonstrated significant PFS superiority over standard-of-care endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant) in MBC. Additionally, it did not show unusual side effects observed with other oral SERDs, like bradycardia, hematotoxicity and vision impairment, and proved to be effective also in case of ESR1 -mutant endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Combination trials of oral SERDs with target agents, such as CDK4/6-inhibitors, are ongoing. Finally, some window-of-opportunity trials showed promising on-target activity in early-stage for this drug class. SUMMARY Promising results from early-phase trials are not translating into sufficient clinical benefit in pivotal trials of main oral SERDs in monotherapy, except for elacestrant. Whether oral SERDs might become the backbone for combination strategies in MBC or the preferred (neo)adjuvant endocrine agents is under evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Francesco Schettini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Battisti NML, Smith IE. Preventing late recurrence in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: a review. Eur J Cancer 2022; 172:53-64. [PMID: 35753212 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Late recurrences are a key challenge for patients with early-stage oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, with the risk of disease relapse continuing steadily from 5 to more than 20 years after diagnosis. Five years of adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor was shown many years ago to improve survival. More recently, the trials of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for more than 5 years have shown a further small gain, but with an associated small risk of increased long-term toxicity including bone loss, cardiovascular impairment and impaired quality of life. This review describes the efficacy and safety of extended endocrine therapy, the optimal selection criteria for patient benefit and the potential for novel agents to improve long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti
- Breast Unit - Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 203 Fulham Rd, Chelsea, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom.
| | - Ian E Smith
- Breast Unit - Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 203 Fulham Rd, Chelsea, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Welslau M, Müller V, Lüftner D, Schütz F, Stickeler E, Fasching PA, Janni W, Thomssen C, Witzel I, Fehm TN, Belleville E, Bader S, Seitz K, Untch M, Thill M, Tesch H, Ditsch N, Lux MP, Aktas B, Banys-Paluchowski M, Schneeweiss A, Harbeck N, Würstlein R, Hartkopf AD, Wöckel A, Seliger B, Massa C, Kolberg HC. Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 1 – Early Stage Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:580-589. [PMID: 35903719 PMCID: PMC9315400 DOI: 10.1055/a-1811-6106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractEvidence relating to the treatment of breast cancer patients with early-stage disease has increased significantly in the past year. Abemaciclib, olaparib, and pembrolizumab are new drugs
with good efficacy in the relevant patient groups. However, some questions remain unanswered. In particular, it remains unclear which premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive
breast cancer should be spared unnecessary treatment. The question of the degree to which chemotherapy exerts a direct cytotoxic effect on the tumor or reduces ovarian function through
chemotherapy could be of key importance. This group of patients could potentially be spared chemotherapy. New, previously experimental biomarker analysis methods, such as spatial analysis of
gene expression (spatial transcriptomics) are gradually finding their way into large randomized phase III trials, such as the NeoTRIP trial. This in turn leads to a better understanding of
the predictive factors of new therapies, for example immunotherapy. This review summarizes the scientific innovations from recent congresses such as the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
2021 but also from recent publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Simon Bader
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Katharina Seitz
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Genecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt am Main
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Seliger
- Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Medical Immunology, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Chiara Massa
- Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Medical Immunology, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lüftner D, Schütz F, Stickeler E, Fasching PA, Janni W, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Thomssen C, Müller V, Fehm TN, Belleville E, Bader S, Untch M, Welslau M, Thill M, Tesch H, Ditsch N, Lux MP, Wöckel A, Aktas B, Schneeweiss A, Würstlein R, Hartkopf AD. Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 5 – Advanced Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:215-225. [PMID: 35169389 PMCID: PMC8837406 DOI: 10.1055/a-1724-9569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the COVID 19 pandemic and mostly virtual congresses, innovation in the treatment of breast cancer patients continues at an unabated pace. This review summarises the current
developments. Initial overall survival data for CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as the first advanced line of therapy in treatment-naive postmenopausal
patients have been published. Similarly, a trial comparing trastuzumab-deruxtecan versus trastuzumab-emtansine revealed a clear benefit regarding progression-free survival. Understanding of
biomarkers making checkpoint inhibitor therapy particularly effective is increasing, and new compounds such as oral selective estrogen receptor destabilisers (SERDs) are entering clinical
development and completing the first phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- palleos healthcare, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Phaon Scientific, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | | | - Simon Bader
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Genecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cusano E, Wong C, Taguedong E, Vaska M, Abedin T, Nixon N, Karim S, Tang P, Heng DYC, Ezeife D. Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:4894-4928. [PMID: 34898590 PMCID: PMC8628676 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28060412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In the era of rapid development of new, expensive cancer therapies, value frameworks have been developed to quantify clinical benefit (CB). We assessed the evolution of CB since the 2015 introduction of The American Society of Clinical Oncology and The European Society of Medical Oncology value frameworks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing systemic therapies for solid malignancies from 2010 to 2020 were evaluated and CB (Δ) in 2010–2014 (pre-value frameworks (PRE)) were compared to 2015–2020 (POST) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and quality of life (QoL). In the 485 studies analyzed (12% PRE and 88% POST), the most common primary endpoint was PFS (49%), followed by OS (20%), RR (12%), and QoL (6%), with a significant increase in OS and decrease in RR as primary endpoints in the POST era (p = 0.011). Multivariable analyses revealed significant improvement in ΔOS POST (OR 2.86, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.26, p = 0.02) while controlling for other variables. After the development of value frameworks, median ΔOS improved minimally. The impact of value frameworks has yet to be fully realized in RCTs. Efforts to include endpoints shown to impact value, such as QoL, into clinical trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Cusano
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | - Chelsea Wong
- Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
| | - Eddy Taguedong
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada;
| | - Marcus Vaska
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (M.V.); (T.A.); (N.N.); (S.K.); (P.T.); (D.Y.C.H.); (D.E.)
| | - Tasnima Abedin
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (M.V.); (T.A.); (N.N.); (S.K.); (P.T.); (D.Y.C.H.); (D.E.)
| | - Nancy Nixon
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (M.V.); (T.A.); (N.N.); (S.K.); (P.T.); (D.Y.C.H.); (D.E.)
| | - Safiya Karim
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (M.V.); (T.A.); (N.N.); (S.K.); (P.T.); (D.Y.C.H.); (D.E.)
| | - Patricia Tang
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (M.V.); (T.A.); (N.N.); (S.K.); (P.T.); (D.Y.C.H.); (D.E.)
| | - Daniel Y. C. Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (M.V.); (T.A.); (N.N.); (S.K.); (P.T.); (D.Y.C.H.); (D.E.)
| | - Doreen Ezeife
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (M.V.); (T.A.); (N.N.); (S.K.); (P.T.); (D.Y.C.H.); (D.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salvo EM, Ramirez AO, Cueto J, Law EH, Situ A, Cameron C, Samjoo IA. Risk of recurrence among patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2021; 57:5-17. [PMID: 33677313 PMCID: PMC8089079 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess breast cancer (BC) outcomes among patients with early-stage hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) BC, receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE) studies were identified using Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Clinical and methodological similarities including alignment of outcome definitions with standardized definitions for efficacy endpoints criteria were assessed to evaluate feasibility of conducting a meta-analysis. Where feasible, 5-year probabilities of BC recurrence or death were estimated using a Bayesian hierarchical arm-based model. RESULTS Of 21 included studies, 8 RCTs and 4 RWE studies reported outcome data of interest. There was heterogeneity in outcome reporting, as well as variation in recurrence risk amongst studies with aligned reporting. Of the 12 studies, 10 were considered for inclusion in a meta-analysis of BC recurrence or death. Only a subgroup analysis of node-positive patients (3 studies; n = 7307) was deemed feasible. The 5-year probability of BC recurrence or death was 17.2% (95% credible interval: 14.6%-20.3%). CONCLUSION Although studies reporting recurrence outcomes were limited, there remains a high risk of BC recurrence, especially among node-positive patients. Approximately 1 in 6 women with node-positive HR+/HER2- early-stage BC receiving endocrine therapy experience recurrence or death within 5-years of initiating treatment, suggesting a need for novel treatments for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jenilee Cueto
- Patient & Health Impact, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ernest H Law
- Patient & Health Impact, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Griffiths JI, Chen J, Cosgrove PA, O’Dea A, Sharma P, Ma C, Trivedi M, Kalinsky K, Wisinski KB, O’Regan R, Makhoul I, Spring LM, Bardia A, Adler FR, Cohen AL, Chang JT, Khan QJ, Bild AH. Serial single-cell genomics reveals convergent subclonal evolution of resistance as early-stage breast cancer patients progress on endocrine plus CDK4/6 therapy. NATURE CANCER 2021; 2:658-671. [PMID: 34712959 PMCID: PMC8547038 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-021-00215-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Combining cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors with endocrine therapy improves outcomes for metastatic estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer patients but its value in earlier stage patients is unclear. We examined evolutionary trajectories of early-stage breast cancer tumors, using single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of serial biopsies from the FELINE clinical trial (#NCT02712723) of endocrine therapy (letrozole) alone or combined with the CDK inhibitor ribociclib. Despite differences in subclonal diversity evolution across patients and treatments, common resistance phenotypes emerged. Resistant tumors treated with combination therapy showed accelerated loss of estrogen signaling with convergent up-regulation of JNK signaling through growth factor receptors. In contrast, cancer cells maintaining estrogen signaling during mono- or combination therapy showed potentiation of CDK4/6 activation and ERK upregulation through ERBB4 signaling. These results indicate that combination therapy in early-stage ER+ breast cancer leads to emergence of resistance through a shift from estrogen to alternative growth signal-mediated proliferation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason I. Griffiths
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.,Department of Mathematics, University of Utah 155 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Jinfeng Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Patrick A. Cosgrove
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Anne O’Dea
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Cynthia Ma
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Meghna Trivedi
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Kevin Kalinsky
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Kari B. Wisinski
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Carbone Cancer Center, WI, 53726, USA
| | - Ruth O’Regan
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Carbone Cancer Center, WI, 53726, USA
| | - Issam Makhoul
- Division of Internal Medical Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Laura M. Spring
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Frederick R. Adler
- Department of Mathematics, University of Utah 155 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.,School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Adam L. Cohen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Jeffrey T. Chang
- Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, School of Biomedical Informatics, UT Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Qamar J. Khan
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, 66160, USA.,To whom correspondence should be addressed: Andrea Bild () and Qamar Khan ()
| | - Andrea H. Bild
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.,To whom correspondence should be addressed: Andrea Bild () and Qamar Khan ()
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tolaney SM, Garrett-Mayer E, White J, Blinder VS, Foster JC, Amiri-Kordestani L, Hwang ES, Bliss JM, Rakovitch E, Perlmutter J, Spears PA, Frank E, Tung NM, Elias AD, Cameron D, Denduluri N, Best AF, DiLeo A, Baizer L, Butler LP, Schwartz E, Winer EP, Korde LA. Updated Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: STEEP Version 2.0. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2720-2731. [PMID: 34003702 PMCID: PMC10166345 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria, established in 2007, provide standardized definitions of adjuvant breast cancer clinical trial end points. Given the evolution of breast cancer clinical trials and improvements in outcomes, a panel of experts reviewed the STEEP criteria to determine whether modifications are needed. METHODS We conducted systematic searches of ClinicalTrials.gov for adjuvant systemic and local-regional therapy trials for breast cancer to investigate if the primary end points reported met STEEP criteria. On the basis of common STEEP deviations, we performed a series of simulations to evaluate the effect of excluding non-breast cancer deaths and new nonbreast primary cancers from the invasive disease-free survival end point. RESULTS Among 11 phase III breast cancer trials with primary efficacy end points, three had primary end points that followed STEEP criteria, four used STEEP definitions but not the corresponding end point names, and four used end points that were not included in the original STEEP manuscript. Simulation modeling demonstrated that inclusion of second nonbreast primary cancer can increase the probability of incorrect inferences, can decrease power to detect clinically relevant efficacy effects, and may mask differences in recurrence rates, especially when recurrence rates are low. CONCLUSION We recommend an additional end point, invasive breast cancer-free survival, which includes all invasive disease-free survival events except second nonbreast primary cancers. This end point should be considered for trials in which the toxicities of agents are well-known and where the risk of second primary cancer is small. Additionally, we provide end point recommendations for local therapy trials, low-risk populations, noninferiority trials, and trials incorporating patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Julia White
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Jared C Foster
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Durham, NC
| | - Judith M Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eileen Rakovitch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Patricia A Spears
- University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Elizabeth Frank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - David Cameron
- University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ana F Best
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Angelo DiLeo
- Hospital of Prato, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - Lawrence Baizer
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Elena Schwartz
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Larissa A Korde
- Cancer Therapy and Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Anastrozole plus fulvestrant vs. anastrozole alone for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 180:269-278. [PMID: 32008124 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05551-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer, whether the combination of anastrozole and fulvestrant is more effective than anastrozole alone is controversial. Our meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the two therapies. METHODS We retrieved relevant studies in Embase, the Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were the disease control rate (DCR), the objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Five articles based on 4 randomized controlled trials containing 2146 patients were identified in our meta-analysis. The combination group had better efficacy in the endpoints of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.99, p = 0.03) and PFS (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.97, p = 0.02). Regarding the ORR, DCR, total AEs and grade 3-5 AEs, we found no difference between the two treatments. The combination group showed a clearly higher rate of treatment discontinuations (95% CI 1.05-3.60, p = 0.03) and AEs leading to death (95% CI 1.12-9.11, p = 0.03). The subgroup analysis of AEs showed an increased incidence of extremity or muscle pain, hematologic effects, gastrointestinal disorders, and hot flashes in the combination group. CONCLUSIONS For HR-positive advanced breast cancer patients, the combination of anastrozole and fulvestrant appears to be superior to anastrozole alone in extending PFS and OS, despite relatively serious AEs.
Collapse
|