A 14-gene B-cell immune signature in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): a pooled analysis of seven studies

BACKGROUND

Early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) displays clinical and biological diversity. From a biological standpoint, immune infiltration plays a crucial role in TNBC prognosis. Currently, there is a lack of genomic tools aiding in treatment decisions for TNBC. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a B-cell/immunoglobulin signature (IGG) alone, or in combination with tumor burden, in predicting prognosis and treatment response in patients with TNBC.

METHODS

Genomic and clinical data were retrieved from 7 cohorts: SCAN-B (N = 874), BrighTNess (n = 482), CALGB-40603 (n = 389), METABRIC (n = 267), TCGA (n = 118), GSE58812 (n = 107), GSE21653 (n = 67). IGG and a risk score integrating IGG with tumor/nodal staging (IGG-Clin) were assessed for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in each cohort. Random effects model was used to derive pooled effect sizes. Association of IGG with pathological complete response (pCR) was assessed in CALGB-40603 and BrighTNess. Immune significance of IGG was estimated through CIBERSORTx and EcoTyper.

FINDINGS

IGG was associated with improved EFS (pooled HR = 0.77, [95% CI = 0.70-0.85], I2 = 18%) and OS (pooled HR = 0.79, [0.73-0.85], I2 = 0%) across cohorts, and was predictive of pCR in CALGB-40603 (OR 1.25, [1.10-1.50]) and BrighTNess (OR 1.57 [1.25-1.98]). IGG-Clin was predictive of recurrence (pooled HR = 2.11, [1.75-2.55], I2 = 0%) and death (pooled HR = 1.99, 95% [0.84-4.73], I2 = 79%) across cohorts. IGG was associated with adaptive immune response at CIBERSORTx and EcoTyper analysis.

INTERPRETATION

IGG is linked to improved prognosis and pCR in early-stage TNBC. The integration of IGG alongside tumor and nodal staging holds promise as an approach to identify patients benefitting from intensified or de-intensified treatments.

FUNDING

This study received funding from: Associació Beca Marta Santamaria, European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programs, Fundación FERO, Fundación CRIS contra el cáncer, Agència de Gestó d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fundación Contigo, Asociación Cáncer de Mama Metastásico IV, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, RESCUER, Fundación científica AECC and FSEOM.

Prognostic value of intrinsic subtypes in hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In hormone receptor-positive (HoR+) breast cancer (BC), gene expression analysis identifies luminal A (LumA), luminal B (LumB), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched (HER2-E), basal-like (BL) intrinsic subtypes and a normal-like group. This classification has an established prognostic value in early-stage HoR+ BC. Here, we carried out a trial-level meta-analysis to determine the prognostic ability of subtypes in metastatic BC (MBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed all the available prospective phase II/III trials in HoR+ MBC where subtype was assessed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) of the LumA subtype compared to non-LumA. Secondary endpoints were PFS/TTP of each individual subtype, according to treatment, menopausal and HER2 status and overall survival (OS). The random-effect model was applied, and heterogeneity assessed through Cochran's Q and I². Threshold for significance was set at P < 0.05. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021255769).

RESULTS

Seven studies were included (2536 patients). Non-LumA represented 55.2% and was associated with worse PFS/TTP than LumA [hazard ratio (HR) 1.77, P < 0.001, I² = 61%], independently of clinical HER2 status [P_{subgroup difference} (P_sub) = 0.16], systemic treatment (P_sub = 0.96) and menopausal status (P_sub = 0.12). Non-LumA tumors also showed worse OS (HR 2.00, P < 0.001, I² = 65%), with significantly different outcomes for LumB (PFS/TTP HR 1.46; OS HR 1.41), HER2-E (PFS/TTP HR 2.39; OS HR 2.08) and BL (PFS/TTP HR 2.67; OS HR 3.26), separately (PFS/TTP P_sub = 0.01; OS P_sub = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses supported the main result. No publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In HoR+ MBC, non-LumA disease is associated with poorer PFS/TTP and OS than LumA, independently of HER2, treatment and menopausal status. Future trials in HoR+ MBC should consider this clinically relevant biological classification.

Abstract P2-23-16: Clinico-Pathological and Molecular Characterization of HER2-Enriched Breast Tumors Independently of HER2 Status

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer (BC) is a highly prevalent and heterogeneous disease, entailing different so-called intrinsic subtypes (IS) according to gene expression, namely Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-Enriched (HER2E) and Basal-like, as well as a normal breast-like group. The HER2E is still a poorly understood entity, which needs further biologic characterization to improve therapeutic management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients (pts) treated at Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain) over 18 years with a diagnosis of metastatic BC, with available matched primary and metastatic tumor samples for gene expression analyses were retrospectively recruited. Using the nCounter® Breast Cancer 360 panel, we studied the expression of 776 genes pertaining to different tumor and immune pathway-related signatures, with a focus on HER2E vs. non-HER2E tumors. Significant changes were considered at a false discovery rate (FDR) &lt; 5%. Main clinicopathological features were also compared. IS changes from primary to metastatic disease were assessed.

RESULTS: Ninety-one pts with paired tumor samples were included. Briefly, primary tumors were 67.0% hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-), 14.8% were HER2-positive (HER2+) and 18.2% were triple-negative (TNBC). IS distribution in primary tumors was the following: 25 Luminal A (28%), 22 Luminal B (24%), 24 HER2E (26%), 12 Basal-like (13%), and 8 Normal-like (9%). In contrast, IS distribution in metastatic tumors was the following: 13 Luminal A (14%), 22 Luminal B (24%), 34 HER2-E (37%), 16 Basal-like (18%), and 6 Normal-like (7%). The HER2E disease proved to be a relatively stable subtype, with 16 (66.7%) tumors not changing IS in the transition to metastatic disease (p=0.078). Particularly, within HR+/HER2-, HER2+ and TNBC, 8/12 (66.7%), 8/10 (80.0%) and 1/2 (50.0%) tumors remained HER2E. Conversely, an overall significant switch from Luminal to non-Luminal tumors at the metastatic progression was observed (p=0.031), with 14/19 (73.7%) new non-Luminal BC being HER2E. When considering all primary and metastatic tumors, HER2E were observed to be less frequently estrogen receptor (ER) positive than non-HER2E tumors (55.8% vs. 78.7%; p=0.002), with lower mean progesterone receptor (PR) levels (15.3% vs. 25.8%; p=0.027). Compared to the other subtypes (as a group), the PAM50 risk of recurrence score (ROR-P) was higher for HER2E tumors (59.1 vs. 41.7; p &lt; 0.001), which were also more frequently HER2+ (36.5% vs. 5.8%) and less likely HR+/HER2- (50.0% vs. 73.6%) and TNBC (13.5% vs. 20.7%), compared to non-HER2E (p &lt; 0.001). No significant differences in grade, TILs, Ki67 and histotype were observed. Overall, 140/776 genes were significantly downregulated in HER2E vs. non-HER2E tumors, including genes related to cell adhesion, migration, DNA damage repair, apoptosis, estrogen signalling pathway, senescence. Conversely, 178/776 genes were significantly upregulated, including the tyrosine-kinase receptor FGFR4, genes involved in nuclear activity, DNA transcription regulation, MAP-kinase signaling pathways, proliferation, cytokine response, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell cycle progression, and immune-related genes such as CD274 (PD-L1 gene).

DISCUSSION: A switch towards more aggressive IS from primary to advanced disease was observed, with an increase in HER2E prevalence. HER2E tumors, which tend to maintain their IS at the metastatic disease, showed upregulation of genes related to proliferation, survival and EMT, coherently with their well-known worse prognosis. FGFR4 and CD274 upregulation, along with downregulation of genes involved in DNA damage repair suggest these tumors might benefit from targeted therapeutic approaches. Genomic higher risk was not convoyed by consistent clinicopathological features, except for lower PR levels and HER2 overexpression at IHC. Further characterization according to primary/metastatic and HR status is ongoing.

Intrinsic subtype distribution across primary and metastatic breast tumors

Citation Format: Francisco Javier Muñoz-Carrillo, Laia Paré, Benedetta Conte, Adela Rodríguez, Patricia Galván, Esther Sanfeliu, Blanca González-Farré, Claudette Falato, Isabel Garcia-Fructuoso, Barbara Adamo, Nuria Chic, Olga Martínez-Sáez, Tomás Pascual, Reinaldo Moreno, Montserrat Muñoz, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Aleix Prat, Francesco Schettini, Maria Vidal. Clinico-Pathological and Molecular Characterization of HER2-Enriched Breast Tumors Independently of HER2 Status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-23-16.

Integrating new oral selective oestrogen receptor degraders in the breast cancer treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Oral SERDs are under extensive development to overcome fulvestrant main limitations, including intramuscular-only formulation and poor performance in early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer. This review summarizes the most relevant evidence published so far and envisions the potential integration of oral SERDs in the therapeutic algorithm of HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Amcenestrant and giredestrant, two of the most promising oral SERDs, recently failed to show a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in pivotal trials. Conversely, elacestrant demonstrated significant PFS superiority over standard-of-care endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant) in MBC. Additionally, it did not show unusual side effects observed with other oral SERDs, like bradycardia, hematotoxicity and vision impairment, and proved to be effective also in case of ESR1 -mutant endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Combination trials of oral SERDs with target agents, such as CDK4/6-inhibitors, are ongoing. Finally, some window-of-opportunity trials showed promising on-target activity in early-stage for this drug class.

SUMMARY

Promising results from early-phase trials are not translating into sufficient clinical benefit in pivotal trials of main oral SERDs in monotherapy, except for elacestrant. Whether oral SERDs might become the backbone for combination strategies in MBC or the preferred (neo)adjuvant endocrine agents is under evaluation.

Specialist palliative and end-of-life care for patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection: a European perspective

BACKGROUND

Specialist palliative care team (SPCT) involvement has been shown to improve symptom control and end-of-life care for patients with cancer, but little is known as to how these have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we report SPCT involvement during the first wave of the pandemic and compare outcomes for patients with cancer who received and did not receive SPCT input from multiple European cancer centres.

METHODS

From the OnCovid repository (N = 1318), we analysed cancer patients aged ⩾18 diagnosed with COVID-19 between 26 February and 22 June 2020 who had complete specialist palliative care team data (SPCT+ referred; SPCT- not referred).

RESULTS

Of 555 eligible patients, 317 were male (57.1%), with a median age of 70 years (IQR 20). At COVID-19 diagnosis, 44.7% were on anti-cancer therapy and 53.3% had ⩾1 co-morbidity. Two hundred and six patients received SPCT input for symptom control (80.1%), psychological support (54.4%) and/or advance care planning (51%). SPCT+ patients had more 'Do not attempt cardio-pulmonary resuscitation' orders completed prior to (12.6% versus 3.7%) and during admission (50% versus 22.1%, p < 0.001), with more SPCT+ patients deemed suitable for treatment escalation (50% versus 22.1%, p < 0.001). SPCT involvement was associated with higher discharge rates from hospital for end-of-life care (9.7% versus 0%, p < 0.001). End-of-life anticipatory prescribing was higher in SPCT+ patients, with opioids (96.3% versus 47.1%) and benzodiazepines (82.9% versus 41.2%) being used frequently for symptom control.

CONCLUSION

SPCT referral facilitated symptom control, emergency care and discharge planning, as well as high rates of referral for psychological support than previously reported. Our study highlighted the critical need of SPCTs for patients with cancer during the pandemic and should inform service planning for this population.

Clinical portrait of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in European cancer patients

The SARS-Cov-2 pandemic significantly impacted on oncology practice across the globe. There is uncertainty as to the contribution of patients' demographics and oncological features on severity and mortality from Covid-19 and little guidance as to the role of anti-cancer and anti-Covid-19 therapy in this population. In a multi-center study of 890 cancer patients with confirmed Covid-19 we demonstrated a worsening gradient of mortality from breast cancer to haematological malignancies and showed that male gender, older age, and number of co-morbidities identifies a subset of patients with significantly worse mortality rates from Covid-19. Provision of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy did not worsen mortality. Exposure to antimalarials was associated with improved mortality rates independent of baseline prognostic factors. This study highlights the clinical utility of demographic factors for individualized risk-stratification of patients and support further research into emerging anti-Covid-19 therapeutics in SARS-Cov-2 infected cancer patients.

Presenting Features and Early Mortality from SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Cancer Patients during the Initial Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Europe

We describe the outcomes in cancer patients during the initial outbreak of the COVID-19 in Europe from the retrospective, multi-center observational OnCovid study. We identified 204 cancer patients from eight centers in the United Kingdom, Italy, and Spain aged > 18 (mean = 69) and diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 26th and April 1st, 2020. A total of 127 (62%) were male, 184 (91%) had a diagnosis of solid malignancy, and 103 (51%) had non-metastatic disease. A total of 161 (79%) had > 1 co-morbidity. A total of 141 (69%) patients had > 1 COVID-19 complication. A total of 36 (19%) were escalated to high-dependency or intensive care. A total of 59 (29%) died, 53 (26%) were discharged, and 92 (45%) were in-hospital survivors. Mortality was higher in patients aged > 65 (36% versus 16%), in those with > 2 co-morbidities (40% versus 18%) and developing > 1 complication from COVID-19 (38% versus 4%, p = 0.004). Multi-variable analyses confirmed age > 65 and > 2 co-morbidities to predict for patient mortality independent of tumor stage, active malignancy, or anticancer therapy. During the early outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Europe co-morbid burden and advancing age predicted for adverse disease course in cancer patients. The ongoing OnCovid study will allow us to compare risks and outcomes in cancer patients between the initial and later stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.