1
|
Nations JA, Lin J, Park AB, Shriver CD, Zhu K. Pulmonary Hypertension and Survival among Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the U.S. Military Health System. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3217. [PMID: 38892928 PMCID: PMC11173320 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is one of the most lethal cancers with survival being closely related to stage and influenced by comorbid illness. The survival implications of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have only been evaluated in small cohorts, with limited long-term follow-up. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 7946 patients with NSCLC diagnosed in the MHS. This study evaluated the survival impact of PH in patients diagnosed with NSCLC in the MHS. Patients were classified as having and not having PH. We stratified PH into those diagnosed before the diagnosis of NSCLC and those diagnosed after NSCLC diagnosis. Results: Relative to patients without PH, patients with PH diagnosed before NSCLC had an increased risk of death (HR = 1.15 [95% CI, 1.02-1.29]). The increased risk of death was more obvious for patients with PH diagnosed after NSCLC compared with those without PH (HR = 2.74 [95% CI, 2.51-2.99]). The results were similar when stratified by patient demographics. Conclusions: In the MHS, PH is associated with worsened NSCLC survival, regardless of when it is diagnosed. When PH is diagnosed after NSCLC, it is associated with a marked reduction in survival, and this finding may suggest a potential role for monitoring pulmonary pressures in NSCLC patients. Furthermore, as specific PH therapy exists, some NSCLC patients with PH may be candidates for therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel A. Nations
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC 20422, USA
- Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Jie Lin
- John P. Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA (C.D.S.); (K.Z.)
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Amie B. Park
- John P. Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA (C.D.S.); (K.Z.)
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Craig D. Shriver
- John P. Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA (C.D.S.); (K.Z.)
- Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Kangmin Zhu
- John P. Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA (C.D.S.); (K.Z.)
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quillet A, Le Stang N, Meriau N, Isambert N, Defossez G. Socio-demographic inequalities in stage at diagnosis of lung cancer: A French population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 89:102522. [PMID: 38237387 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosing patients at a non-advanced stage has become a mainstay of lung cancer prevention and control strategies. Understanding socio-demographic inequalities in stage at diagnosis may improve the targeting of interventions on patients at higher risk. This study aimed to identify these socio-demographic determinants in a large-scale French population-based cancer registry. METHODS All incident lung cancers diagnosed between 2008 and 2019 identified from the Poitou-Charentes Cancer Registry (south-west France) were included. Stage at diagnosis was categorised as advanced/non-advanced (TNM III/IV vs I/II) according to the 8th TNM edition, the objective being to ensure a consistent level of prognosis over time. Socio-demographic variables included age, sex, the French European Deprivation Index (EDI) and patient's place of residence. Their impact on stage at diagnosis was quantified by multivariate logistic regression models with subgroup analyses by histological subtype. RESULTS Out of the 15,487 included patients, 75% were diagnosed at an advanced stage (66% to 95% depending on the histological subtype), 17% at a non-advanced stage and 10% at a non-specified stage. Multivariate analysis showed different patterns according to histological subtypes. In patients with adenocarcinoma, a higher risk of advanced stage was found for younger and older patients (u-shape), those most deprived, and those living in rural areas. The same effect of age was reported for squamous cell carcinomas, while no association was found for small-cell lung carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS This study highlighted substantial socio-demographic inequalities in stage at diagnosis, specifically for adenocarcinoma patients. Diagnosis strategies could be refined and strengthened in the non-smoker population, in which adenocarcinomas are mainly reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Quillet
- CHU de Poitiers, Service D'Information Médicale, F-86000 Poitiers, France; Université de Poitiers, CIC-INSERM, Axe SCALE-EPI, F-86000 Poitiers, France; CHU de Poitiers, Registre Général des Cancers de Poitou-Charentes, F-86000 Poitiers, France.
| | - Nolwenn Le Stang
- Université de Poitiers, CIC-INSERM, Axe SCALE-EPI, F-86000 Poitiers, France; CHU de Poitiers, Registre Général des Cancers de Poitou-Charentes, F-86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Nicolas Meriau
- CHU de Poitiers, Registre Général des Cancers de Poitou-Charentes, F-86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Nicolas Isambert
- CHU de Poitiers, Service D'Oncologie Médicale, F-86000 Poitiers, France; Université de Poitiers, CIC-INSERM, Axe THOR, F-86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Gautier Defossez
- Université de Poitiers, CIC-INSERM, Axe SCALE-EPI, F-86000 Poitiers, France; CHU de Poitiers, Registre Général des Cancers de Poitou-Charentes, F-86000 Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aktary ML, Ghebrial M, Wang Q, Shack L, Robson PJ, Kopciuk KA. Health-Related and Behavioral Factors Associated With Lung Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: Observations From Alberta's Tomorrow Project. Cancer Control 2022; 29:10732748221091678. [PMID: 35392690 PMCID: PMC9016563 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221091678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Canada, with stage at
diagnosis among the top predictors of lung cancer survival. Identifying
factors associated with stage at diagnosis can help reduce lung cancer
morbidity and mortality. This study used data from a prospective cohort
study of adults living in Alberta, Canada to examine factors associated with
lung cancer stage at diagnosis. Methods This cohort study used data from adults aged 35–69 years enrolled in
Alberta’s Tomorrow Project. Partial Proportional Odds models were used to
examine associations between sociodemographic characteristics and
health-related factors and subsequent lung cancer stage at diagnosis. Results A total of 221 participants (88 males and 133 females) developed lung cancer
over the study period. Nearly half (48.0%) of lung cancers were diagnosed at
a late stage (stage IV), whereas 30.8 % and 21.3% were diagnosed at stage
I/II and III, respectively. History of sunburn in the past year was
protective against late-stage lung cancer diagnosis (odds ratio (OR) .40,
P=.005). In males, a higher number of lifetime prostate specific antigen
tests was associated with reduced odds of late-stage lung cancer diagnosis
(odds ratio .66, P=.02). Total recreational physical activity was associated
with increased odds of late-stage lung cancer diagnosis (OR 1.08,
P=.01). Discussion Lung cancer stage at diagnosis remains a crucial determinant of prognosis.
This study identified important factors associated with lung cancer stage at
diagnosis. Study findings can inform targeted cancer prevention initiatives
towards improving early detection of lung cancer and lung cancer
survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L Aktary
- Faculty of Kinesiology, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Monica Ghebrial
- Cumming School of Medicine, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Qinggang Wang
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, 3146Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lorraine Shack
- Cancer Surveillance and Reporting, 3146Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paula J Robson
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Cancer Care Alberta, 3146Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Karen A Kopciuk
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, 3146Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Departments of Oncology, Community Health Sciences and Mathematics and Statistics, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boakye D, Günther K, Niedermaier T, Haug U, Ahrens W, Nagrani R. Associations between comorbidities and advanced stage diagnosis of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 75:102054. [PMID: 34773768 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Comorbidities and advanced stage diagnosis (ASD) are both associated with poorer cancer outcomes, but the association between comorbidities and ASD is poorly understood. We summarized epidemiological evidence on the association between comorbidities and ASD of selected cancers in a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed and Web of Science databases up to June 3rd, 2021 for studies assessing the association between comorbidities and ASD of lung, breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Also, potential variations in the associations between comorbidities and ASD by cancer type were investigated using random-effects meta-regression. Thirty-seven studies were included in this review, including 8,069,397 lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients overall. The Charlson comorbidity index score was positively associated with ASD (stages III-IV) of breast cancer but was inversely associated with ASD of lung cancer (pinteraction = 0.004). Regarding specific comorbidities, diabetes was positively associated with ASD (OR = 1.17, 95%CI = 1.09-1.26), whereas myocardial infarction was inversely associated with ASD (OR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.75-0.95). The association between renal disease and ASD differed by cancer type (pinteraction < 0.001). A positive association was found with prostate cancer (OR = 2.02, 95%CI = 1.58-2.59) and an inverse association with colorectal cancer (OR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.70-1.00). In summary, certain comorbidities (e.g., diabetes) may be positively associated with ASD of several cancer types. It needs to be clarified whether closer monitoring for early cancer signs or screening in these patients is reasonable, considering the problem of over-diagnosis particularly relevant in patients with short remaining life expectancy such as those with comorbidities. Also, evaluation of the cost-benefit relationship of cancer screening according to the type and severity of comorbidity (rather than summary scores) may be beneficial for personalized cancer screening in populations with chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Boakye
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Kathrin Günther
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Tobias Niedermaier
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Haug
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany; Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Ahrens
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany; Institute of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Rajini Nagrani
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hao Z, Liang H, Zhang Y, Wei W, Lan Y, Qiu S, Lin G, Wang R, Liu Y, Chen Y, Huang J, Wang W, Cui F, Goto T, Jeong JY, Veronesi G, Lopez-Pastorini A, Igai H, Liang W, He J, Liu J. Surgery for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer: lobectomy or sub-lobar resection? Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:1408-1423. [PMID: 33889519 PMCID: PMC8044485 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-21-39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has many comorbidities, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, and older age-related comorbidities. A survival benefit was observed in such patients who underwent surgery for selected oligometastatic disease. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence to support whether lobectomy (compared with sub-lobar resection) would further prolong these patients' lives. Methods Patients with metastatic NSCLC who underwent primary tumor resection were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and then divided into lobectomy and sub-lobar resection groups. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1) was performed to match the baseline characteristics of the two groups. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was estimated. Results In total, 24,268 patients with metastatic NSCLC were identified; 4,114 (16.95%) underwent primary tumor surgery, and of these, 2,045 (49.71%) underwent lobectomy and 1,766 (42.93%) underwent sub-lobar resection. After PSM, 644 patients in each group were included. Lobectomy was independently correlated with longer median CSS time [hazards ratio (HR): 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.80, P<0.001]. The 1, 2, and 3-year survival rates after PSM also favored the lobectomy group. However, no significant survival difference was found for wedge resection and segmentectomy (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.70-1.31, P=0.490). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates after PSM also exhibited no difference within the sub-lobar group. We explored whether lymph node dissection would provide additional survival benefits for stage IV NSCLC patients. According to the multivariate Cox analysis of the matched population, lymph node dissection was independently associated with better CSS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.88, P<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65-0.86, P<0.001). We confirmed this result in the different types of surgery and found that the lymph node dissection group consistently had better survival outcomes both in the lobectomy group and sub-lobar resection population. According to the subgroup analysis, with the exception of stage T4 and brain metastatic patients, all of the patient subtypes exhibited greater benefit from lobectomy than sub-lobar resection. Conclusions Lobectomy has a greater survival benefit in metastatic NSCLC patients compared with sub-lobar resection when radical treatment of primary site was indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhexue Hao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hengrui Liang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yichi Zhang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, China
| | - Yuting Lan
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuxian Qiu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo Lin
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Runchen Wang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yulin Liu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yingying Chen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fei Cui
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China
| | - Taichiro Goto
- Lung Cancer and Respiratory Disease Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Jin Yong Jeong
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Lopez-Pastorini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lung Clinic, Hospital of the City of Cologne, University of Witten-Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hitoshi Igai
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Wenhua Liang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianxing He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Betancourt JA, Stigler Granados P, Pacheco GJ, Shanmugam R, Kruse CS, Fulton LV. Obesity and Morbidity Risk in the U.S. Veteran. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 8:healthcare8030191. [PMID: 32610637 PMCID: PMC7551346 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8030191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The obesity epidemic in the United States has been well documented and serves as the basis for a number of health interventions across the nation. However, those who have served in the U.S. military (Veteran population) suffer from obesity in higher numbers and have an overall disproportionate poorer health status when compared to the health of the older non-Veteran population in the U.S. which may further compound their overall health risk. This study examined both the commonalities and the differences in obesity rates and the associated co-morbidities among the U.S. Veteran population, utilizing data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). These data are considered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to be the nation’s best source for health-related survey data, and the 2018 version includes 437,467 observations. Study findings show not only a significantly higher risk of obesity in the U.S. Veteran population, but also a significantly higher level (higher odds ratio) of the associated co-morbidities when compared to non-Veterans, including coronary heart disease (CHD) or angina (odds ratio (OR) = 2.63); stroke (OR = 1.86); skin cancer (OR = 2.18); other cancers (OR = 1.73); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR = 1.52), emphysema, or chronic bronchitis; arthritis (OR = 1.52), rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia; depressive disorders (OR = 0.84), and diabetes (OR = 1.61) at the 0.95 confidence interval level.
Collapse
|