Preconditioning by Levosimendan is Mediated by Activation of Mitochondrial Ca2+-Sensitive Potassium (mBKCa) Channels

Role of organellar Ca2+-activated K+ channels in disease development

The organellar Ca2+-activated K+ channels share a similar ability to transfer the alteration of Ca2+ concentration to membrane conductance of potassium. Multiple effects of Ca2+-activated K+ channels on cell metabolism and complex signaling pathways during organ development have been explored. The organellar Ca2+-activated K+ channels are able to control the ionic equilibrium and are always associated with oxidative stress in different organelles and the whole cells. Some drugs targeting Ca2+-activated K+ channels have been tested for various diseases in clinical trials. In this review, the known roles of organellar Ca2+-activated K+ channels were described, and their effects on different diseases, particularly on diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and neurological diseases were discussed. It was attempted to summarize the currently known operational modes with the involvement of organellar Ca2+-activated K+ channels. This review may assist scholars to more comprehensively understand organellar Ca2+-activated K+ channels and related diseases.

Levosimendan: mechanistic insight and its diverse future aspects in cardiac care

Inotropic agents are generally recommended to use in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) concurrent to end-organ dysfunction. However, due to certain pharmacological limitations like developing life threatening arrhythmia and tolerance, cannot be employed as much as needed. Meanwhile, Calcium ion (Ca²⁺) sensitisers exhibits their inotropic action by increasing the sensitivity of the cardiomyocyte to intracellular Ca²⁺ ion and have been reported as emerging therapeutic alternative in HF cases. Levosimendan (LEVO) is an inodilator and with its unique pharmacology justifying its use in a wide range of cardiac alterations in HF particularly in undergoing cardiac surgery. It is also reported to be better than classical inotropes in maintaining cardiac mechanical efficacy and reducing congestion in acute HF with hypotension. This review paper was designed to compile various evidence about basic pharmacology and potential clinical aspects of LEVO in cardiac surgery and other HF associated alterations. This will benefit directly to the researcher in initiating research and to fill the gaps in the area of thrust.

The Coadministration of Levosimendan and Exenatide Offers a Significant Cardioprotective Effect to Isolated Rat Hearts against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

(1) Background: The present study aims to investigate the effect of administration of Levosimendan and Exenatide in various concentrations, as well as of the coadministration of those agents in an ischemia–reperfusion injury isolated heart model. (2) Methods: After 30 min of perfusion, the hearts underwent a 30 min period of regional ischemia followed by a 120 min period of reperfusion. All animals were randomly divided into 12 experimental groups of nine animals in each group: (1) Control, (2) Sham, (3) Digox (Negative control, Digoxin 1.67 μg/min), (4) Levo 1 (Levosimendan 0.01 μg/min), (5) Levo 2 (Levosimendan 0.03 μg/mL), (6) Levo 3 (Levosimendan 0.1 μg/min), (7) Levo 4 (Levosimendan 0.3 μg/min), (8) Levo 5 (Levosimendan 1 μg/min), (9) Exen 1 (Exenatide 0.001 μg/min), (10) Exen 2 (Exenatide 0.01 μg/min), (11) Exen 3 (Exenatide 0.1 μg/min) and (12) Combi (Levosimendan 0.1 µg/mL + Exenatide 0.001 μg/min). The hemodynamic parameters were recorded throughout the experiment. Arrhythmias and coronary flow were also evaluated. After every experiment the heart was suitably prepared and infarct size was measured. Markers of myocardial injury were also measured. Finally, oxidative stress was evaluated measuring reactive oxygen species. (3) Results: A dose-dependent improvement of the haemodynamic response was observed after the administration of both Levosimendan and Exenatide. The coadministration of both agents presented an even greater effect, improving the haemodynamic parameters further than the two agents separately. Levosimendan offered an increase of the coronary flow and both agents offered a reduction of arrhythmias. A dose-dependent reduction of the size of myocardial infarction and myocardial injury was observed after administration of Levosimendan and Exenatide. The coadministration of both agents offered a further improving the above parameters. Levosimendan also offered a significant reduction of oxidative stress. (4) Conclusions: The administration of Levosimendan and Exenatide offers a significant benefit by improving the haemodynamic response, increasing the coronary flow and reducing the occurrence of arrhythmias, the size of myocardial injury and myocardial oxidative stress in isolated rat hearts.

The Use of Levosimendan for the Treatment of Heart Failure and its Potential Organoprotective Effects

The review article is aimed at providing a recent update on the use of levosimendan, an inotropic drug in current use for the treatment of heart failure. The review discusses its mechanisms of action, main hemodynamic effects, clinical trials and obtained evidences that have formed the basis of the current guidelines on its use, as well as the latest clinical and experimental trials evaluating its organ-protective effects. Conclusion: levosimendan has a promising potential for treating heart failure, prescribed even in low doses, and may be regarded as a drug with cerebroprotective and possible nephroprotective effects, requiring further large randomized clinical trials.

Levosimendan-induced venodilation is mediated by opening of potassium channels

Unique vascular responses adhere to the cardiovascular efficacy of the inodilator levosimendan. In particular, selective venodilation appears to explain its clinical benefit during pulmonary hypertension complicated by heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Vasodilators increase vessel diameter in various parts of the vascular system to different degrees and thereby influence blood pressure, its distribution, and organ perfusion depending on their mechanisms of action. Levosimendan and its long‐lived active metabolite OR‐1896 mobilize a set of vasodilatory mechanisms, that is, the opening of the ATP‐sensitive K⁺ channels and other K⁺ channels on top of a highly selective inhibition of the phosphodiesterase III enzyme. A vessel‐specific combination of the above vasodilator mechanisms—in concert with cardiac effects and cardiovascular reflex regulations—illustrates the pharmacological profile of levosimendan in various cardiovascular disorders. While levosimendan has been known to be an inotrope, its properties as an activator of ATP‐sensitive K⁺ channels have gone largely ignored with respect to clinical applications. Here, we provide a summary of what is known about the ATP‐sensitive K⁺ channel properties in preclinical studies and now for the first time, its ATP‐sensitive K⁺ channel properties in a clinical trial.

Levosimendan Versus Milrinone and Release of Myocardial Biomarkers After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: Post Hoc Analysis of Clinical Trial Data

OBJECTIVES

We compared the effect of two inodilators, levosimendan and milrinone, on the plasma levels of myocardial injury biomarkers, that is, high-sensitivity troponin T and heart-type fatty acid binding protein, and on N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide as a biomarker of ventricular function. We hypothesized that levosimendan could attenuate the degree of myocardial injury when compared with milrinone.

DESIGN

A post hoc, nonprespecified exploratory secondary analysis of the Milrinone versus Levosimendan-1 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02232399).

SETTING

Two pediatric tertiary university hospitals.

PATIENTS

Infants 1-12 months old, diagnosed with ventricular septal defect, complete atrioventricular septal defect, or Tetralogy of Fallot undergoing corrective surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

INTERVENTIONS

Seventy patients received a loading dose of either levosimendan or milrinone at the start of cardiopulmonary bypass followed by an infusion of the respective drug, which continued for 26 hours.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Plasma levels of the three cardiac biomarkers were measured prior to the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass and 2, 6, and 24 hours after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. In both groups, the levels of high-sensitivity troponin T and heart-type fatty acid binding protein were highest at 2 hours post cardiopulmonary bypass, whereas the highest level of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide occurred at 24 hours post cardiopulmonary bypass. There was no significant difference in the biomarkers' plasma levels between the study groups over time. Neither was there a significant difference in the postoperative peak plasma levels of the cardiac biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

In this post hoc analysis of the MiLe-1 trial, there was no demonstrable difference in the postoperative cardiac biomarker profile of myocardial injury and ventricular function when comparing infants managed in the perioperative period with levosimendan versus milrinone.

Combination of Cyclosporine A and Levosimendan Induces Cardioprotection under Acute Hyperglycemia

Prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction is detrimentally affected by comorbidities like diabetes mellitus. In the experimental setting, not only diabetes mellitus but also acute hyperglycemia is shown to hamper cardioprotective properties by multiple pharmacological agents. For Levosimendan-induced postconditioning, a strong infarct size reducing effect is demonstrated in healthy myocardium. However, acute hyperglycemia is suggested to block this protective effect. In the present study, we investigated whether (1) Levosimendan-induced postconditioning exerts a concentration-dependent effect under hyperglycemic conditions and (2) whether a combination with the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) blocker cyclosporine A (CsA) restores the cardioprotective properties of Levosimendan under hyperglycemia. For this experimental investigation, hearts of male Wistar rats were randomized and mounted onto a Langendorff system, perfused with Krebs-Henseleit buffer with a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All isolated hearts were subjected to 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion under hyperglycemic conditions. (1) Hearts were perfused with various concentrations of Levosimendan (Lev) (0.3–10 μM) for 10 min at the onset of reperfusion, in order to investigate a concentration–response relationship. In the second set of experiments (2), 0.3 μM Levosimendan was administered in combination with the mPTP blocker CsA, to elucidate the underlying mechanism of blocked cardioprotection under hyperglycemia. Infarct size was determined by tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. (1) Control (Con) hearts showed an infarct size of 52 ± 12%. None of the administered Levosimendan concentrations reduced the infarct size (Lev0.3: 49 ± 9%; Lev1: 57 ± 9%; Lev3: 47 ± 11%; Lev10: 50 ± 7%; all ns vs. Con). (2) Infarct size of Con and Lev0.3 hearts were 53 ± 4% and 56 ± 2%, respectively. CsA alone had no effect on infarct size (CsA: 50 ± 10%; ns vs. Con). The combination of Lev0.3 and CsA (Lev0.3 ± CsA) induced a significant infarct size reduction compared to Lev0.3 (Lev0.3+CsA: 35 ± 4%; p < 0.05 vs. Lev0.3). We demonstrated that (1) hyperglycemia blocks the infarct size reducing effects of Levosimendan-induced postconditioning and cannot be overcome by an increased concentration. (2) Furthermore, cardioprotection under hyperglycemia can be restored by combining Levosimendan and the mPTP blocker CsA.

Pharmacological Conditioning of the Heart: An Update on Experimental Developments and Clinical Implications

The aim of pharmacological conditioning is to protect the heart against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and its consequences. There is extensive literature that reports a multitude of different cardioprotective signaling molecules and mechanisms in diverse experimental protocols. Several pharmacological agents have been evaluated in terms of myocardial I/R injury. While results from experimental studies are immensely encouraging, translation into the clinical setting remains unsatisfactory. This narrative review wants to focus on two aspects: (1) give a comprehensive update on new developments of pharmacological conditioning in the experimental setting concentrating on recent literature of the last two years and (2) briefly summarize clinical evidence of these cardioprotective substances in the perioperative setting highlighting their clinical implications. By directly opposing each pharmacological agent regarding its recent experimental knowledge and most important available clinical data, a clear overview is given demonstrating the remaining gap between basic research and clinical practice. Finally, future perspectives are given on how we might overcome the limited translatability in the field of pharmacological conditioning.

Dexmedetomidine Provides Cardioprotection During Early or Late Reperfusion Mediated by Different Mitochondrial K+-Channels

BACKGROUND

Cardioprotective interventions-such as pharmacological postconditioning-are a promising strategy to reduce deleterious consequences of ischemia and reperfusion injury (I/RI) in the heart, especially as timing and onset of myocardial infarction are unpredictable. Pharmacological postconditioning by treatment with dexmedetomidine (Dex), an α2-adrenoreceptor agonist, during reperfusion protects hearts from I/RI, independently of time point and duration of application during the reperfusion phase. The mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K (mKATP) and mitochondrial large-conductance calcium-sensitive potassium channel (mBKCa) play a pivotal role in mediating this cardioprotective effect. Therefore, we investigated whether Dex-induced cardioprotection during early or late reperfusion is mediated variously by these mitochondrial K-channels.

METHODS

Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomized into 8 groups and underwent a protocol of 15 minutes adaption, 33 minutes ischemia, and 60 minutes reperfusion in an in vitro Langendorff-system. A 10-minute treatment phase was started directly (first subgroup, early reperfusion) or 30 minutes (second subgroup, late reperfusion) after the onset of reperfusion. Control (Con) hearts received vehicle only. In the first subgroup, hearts were treated with 3 nM Dex, 100 µM mKATP-channel blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate (5HD) or 1 µM mBKCa-channel blocker Paxilline (Pax) alone or with respective combinations (5HD + Dex, Pax + Dex). Hearts of the second subgroup received Dex alone (Dex30') or in combination with the respective blockers (5HD + Dex30', Pax + Dex30'). Infarct size was determined with triphenyltetrazoliumchloride staining. Hemodynamic variables were recorded during the whole experiment.

RESULTS

During early reperfusion (first subgroup), the infarct size reducing effect of Dex (Con: 57% ± 9%, Dex: 31% ± 7%; P< .0001 versus Con) was completely abolished by 5HD and Pax (52% ± 6%; Pax + Dex: 53% ± 4%; each P< .0001 versus Dex), while both blockers alone had no effect on infarct size (5HD: 54% ± 8%, Pax: 53% ± 11%). During late reperfusion (second subgroup) the protective effect of Dex (Dex30': 33% ± 10%, P< .0001 versus Con) was fully abrogated by Pax (Pax + Dex30': 58% ± 7%, P < .0001 versus Dex30'), whereas 5HD did not block cardioprotection (5HD + Dex30': 36% ± 7%). Between groups and within each group throughout reperfusion no significant differences in hemodynamic variables were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardioprotection by treatment with Dex during early reperfusion seems to be mediated by both mitochondrial K-channels, whereas during late reperfusion only mBKCa-channels are involved.

Perioperative Cardioprotection: General Mechanisms and Pharmacological Approaches

Cardioprotection encompasses a variety of strategies protecting the heart against myocardial injury that occurs during and after inadequate blood supply to the heart during myocardial infarction. While restoring reperfusion is crucial for salvaging myocardium from further damage, paradoxically, it itself accounts for additional cell death-a phenomenon named ischemia/reperfusion injury. Therefore, therapeutic strategies are necessary to render the heart protected against myocardial infarction. Ischemic pre- and postconditioning, by short periods of sublethal cardiac ischemia and reperfusion, are still the strongest mechanisms to achieve cardioprotection. However, it is highly impractical and far too invasive for clinical use. Fortunately, it can be mimicked pharmacologically, for example, by volatile anesthetics, noble gases, opioids, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. These substances are all routinely used in the clinical setting and seem promising candidates for successful translation of cardioprotection from experimental protocols to clinical trials. This review presents the fundamental mechanisms of conditioning strategies and provides an overview of the most recent and relevant findings on different concepts achieving cardioprotection in the experimental setting, specifically emphasizing pharmacological approaches in the perioperative context.

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Surgery: Mechanisms and Protection

The immune system is an evolutionary hallmark of higher organisms that defends the host against invading pathogens and exogenous infections. This defense includes the recruitment of immune cells to the site of infection and the initiation of an inflammatory response to contain and eliminate pathogens. However, an inflammatory response may also be triggered by noninfectious stimuli such as major surgery, and, in case of an overshooting, still not comprehensively understood reaction, lead to tissue destruction and organ dysfunction. Unfortunately, in some cases, the immune system may not effectively distinguish between stimuli elicited by major surgery, which ideally should only require a modest inflammatory response, and those elicited by trauma or pathogenic infection. Surgical procedures thus represent a potential trigger for systemic inflammation that causes the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, endothelial dysfunction, glycocalyx damage, activation of neutrophils, and ultimately tissue and multisystem organ destruction. In this review, we discuss and summarize currently available mechanistic knowledge on surgery-associated systemic inflammation, demarcation toward other inflammatory complications, and possible therapeutic options. These options depend on uncovering the underlying mechanisms and could include pharmacologic agents, remote ischemic preconditioning protocols, cytokine blockade or clearance, and optimization of surgical procedures, anesthetic regimens, and perioperative inflammatory diagnostic assessment. Currently, a large gap between basic science and clinically confirmed data exists due to a limited evidence base of translational studies. We thus summarize important steps toward the understanding of the precise time- and space-regulated processes in systemic perioperative inflammation.

Potential of the Cardiovascular Drug Levosimendan in the Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: An Overview of a Working Hypothesis

Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer that promotes myocyte contractility through its calcium-dependent interaction with cardiac troponin C. Administered intravenously, it has been used for nearly 2 decades to treat acute and advanced heart failure and to support the heart function in various therapy settings characterized by low cardiac output. Effects of levosimendan on noncardiac muscle suggest a possible new application in the treatment of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a neuromuscular disorder characterized by progressive weakness, and eventual paralysis. Previous attempts to improve the muscle response in ALS patients and thereby maintain respiratory function and delay progression of disability have produced some mixed results. Continuing this line of investigation, levosimendan has been shown to enhance in vitro the contractility of the diaphragm muscle fibers of non-ALS patients and to improve in vivo diaphragm neuromuscular efficiency in healthy subjects. Possible positive effects on respiratory function in people with ALS were seen in an exploratory phase 2 study, and a phase 3 clinical trial is now underway to evaluate the potential benefit of an oral form of levosimendan on both respiratory and overall functions in patients with ALS. Here, we will review the various known pharmacologic effects of levosimendan, considering their relevance to people living with ALS.

Cardioprotection in right heart failure

Ischaemic and pharmacological conditioning of the left ventricle is mediated by the activation of signalling cascades, which finally converge at the mitochondria and reduce ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Whereas the molecular mechanisms of conditioning in the left ventricle are well characterized, cardioprotection of the right ventricle is principally feasible but less established. Similar to what is known for the left ventricle, a dysregulation in signalling pathways seems to play a role in I/R injury of the healthy and failing right ventricle and in the ability/inability of the right ventricle to respond to a conditioning stimulus. The maintenance of mitochondrial function seems to be crucial in both ventricles to reduce I/R injury. As far as currently known, similar molecular mechanisms mediate ischaemic and pharmacological preconditioning in the left and right ventricles. However, the two ventricles seem to respond differently towards exercise‐induced preconditioning.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed issue on Risk factors, comorbidities, and comedications in cardioprotection. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v177.23/issuetoc

Levosimendan Improves Oxidative Balance in Cardiogenic Shock/Low Cardiac Output Patients

The beneficial effects exerted by levosimendan against cardiac failure could be related to the modulation of oxidative balance. We aimed to examine the effects of levosimendan in patients with cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output on cardiac systo-diastolic function and plasma oxidants/antioxidants (glutathione, GSH; thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, TBARS). In four patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or angioplasty, cardiovascular parameters and plasma GSH and TBARS were measured at T0 (before levosimendan infusion), T1 (1 h after the achievement of the therapeutic dosage of levosimendan), T2 (end of levosimendan infusion), T3 (72 h after the end of levosimendan infusion), and T4 (end of cardiogenic shock). We found an improvement in the indices of systolic (ejection fraction, cardiac output, cardiac index) and diastolic (E to early diastolic mitral annular tissue velocity, E/'; early to late diastolic transmitral flow velocity, EA) cardiac function at early T2. A reduction of central venous pressure and pulmonary wedge pressure was also observed. Plasma levels of GSH and TBARS were restored by levosimendan at T1, as well. The results obtained indicate that levosimendan administration can regulate oxidant/antioxidant balance as an early effect in cardiogenic shock/low cardiac output patients. Modulation of oxidative status on a mitochondrial level could thus play a role in exerting the cardio-protection exerted by levosimendan in these patients.

Milrinone-Induced Pharmacological Preconditioning in Cardioprotection: Hints for a Role of Mitochondrial Mechanisms

The activation of mitochondrial calcium-sensitive potassium (mBK_Ca) channels is crucially involved in cardioprotection induced by preconditioning. For milrinone (Mil)-induced preconditioning, the involvement of mBK_Ca-channels and further mitochondrial signaling is unknown. We hypothesize that (1) Mil-induced preconditioning is concentration-dependent and (2) that the activation of mBK_Ca-channels, release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) could be involved. Isolated hearts of male Wistar rats were perfused with Krebs-Henseleit buffer and underwent 33 min of ischemia followed by 60 min of reperfusion. For determination of a concentration-dependent effect of Mil, hearts were perfused with different concentrations of Mil (0.3–10 µM) over 10 min before ischemia. In a second set of experiments, in addition to controls, hearts were pretreated with the lowest protective concentration of 1 µM Mil either alone or combined with the mBK_Ca-channel blocker paxilline (Pax + Mil), or paxilline alone (Pax). In additional groups, Mil was administered with and without the ROS scavenger N-2-mercaptopropionylglycine (MPG + Mil, MPG) or the mPTP inhibitor cyclosporine A (MPG + Mil + CsA, CsA + Mil), respectively. Infarct sizes were determined by triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. The lowest and most cardioprotective concentration was 1 µM Mil (Mil 1: 32 ± 6%; p < 0.05 vs. Con: 63 ± 8% and Mil 0.3: 49 ± 6%). Pax and MPG blocked the infarct size reduction of Mil (Pax + Mil: 53 ± 6%, MPG + Mil: 59 ± 7%; p < 0.05 vs. Mil: 34 ± 6%) without having an effect on infarct size when administered alone (Pax: 53 ± 7%, MPG: 58 ± 5%; ns vs. Con). The combined administration of CsA completely restored the MPG-inhibited cardioprotection of Mil (MPG + Mil + CsA: 35 ± 7%, p < 0.05 vs. MPG + Mil). Milrinone concentration-dependently induces preconditioning. Cardioprotection is mediated by the activation of mBK_Ca-channels, release of ROS and mPTP inhibition.

Myocardial Ischemia and Diabetes Mellitus: Role of Oxidative Stress in the Connection between Cardiac Metabolism and Coronary Blood Flow

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) has several risk factors, among which diabetes mellitus represents one of the most important. In diabetic patients, the pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia remains unclear yet: some have atherosclerotic plaque which obstructs coronary blood flow, others show myocardial ischemia due to coronary microvascular dysfunction in the absence of plaques in epicardial vessels. In the cross-talk between myocardial metabolism and coronary blood flow (CBF), ion channels have a main role, and, in diabetic patients, they are involved in the pathophysiology of IHD. The exposition to the different cardiovascular risk factors and the ischemic condition determine an imbalance of the redox state, defined as oxidative stress, which shows itself with oxidant accumulation and antioxidant deficiency. In particular, several products of myocardial metabolism, belonging to oxidative stress, may influence ion channel function, altering their capacity to modulate CBF, in response to myocardial metabolism, and predisposing to myocardial ischemia. For this reason, considering the role of oxidative and ion channels in the pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia, it is allowed to consider new therapeutic perspectives in the treatment of IHD.

Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning

Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed on a Langendorff system and perfused with Krebs–Henseleit buffer (KHB) at a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All hearts underwent 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Three different anesthetic regimens were conducted throughout the experiments: propofol (11 μM), sevoflurane (2.5 Vol%) and dexmedetomidine (1.5 nM). Under each anesthetic regimen, pharmacological preconditioning was induced by administration of milrinone (1 μM) or levosimendan (0.3 μM) 10 min before ischemia. Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Infarct sizes in control groups were comparable (KHB-Con: 53 ± 9%, Prop-Con: 56 ± 9%, Sevo-Con: 56 ± 8%, Dex-Con: 53 ± 9%; ns). Propofol completely abolished preconditioning by milrinone and levosimendan (Prop-Mil: 52 ± 8%, Prop-Lev: 52 ± 8%; ns versus Prop-Con), while sevoflurane did not (Sevo-Mil: 31 ± 9%, Sevo-Lev: 33 ± 7%; p < 0.05 versus Sevo-Con). Under dexmedetomidine, results were inconsistent; levosimendan induced infarct size reduction (Dex-Lev: 36 ± 6%; p < 0.05 versus Dex-Con) but not milrinone (Dex-Mil: 51 ± 8%; ns versus Dex-Con). The choice of the anesthetic regimen has an impact on infarct size reduction by pharmacological preconditioning.