Concentration-dependent toxicogenomic changes of silver nanoparticles in hepatocyte-like cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells

Oxidative DNA damage contributes to usnic acid-induced toxicity in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes

Dietary supplements containing usnic acid have been increasingly marketed for weight loss over the past decades, even though incidences of severe hepatotoxicity and acute liver failure due to their overuse have been reported. To date, the toxic mechanism of usnic acid-induced liver injury at the molecular level still remains to be fully elucidated. Here, we conducted a transcriptomic study on usnic acid using a novel in vitro hepatotoxicity model employing human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived hepatocytes. Treatment with 20 μM usnic acid for 24 h caused 4272 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the cells. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) based on the DEGs and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using the whole transcriptome expression data concordantly revealed several signaling pathways and biological processes that, when taken together, suggest that usnic acid caused oxidative stress and DNA damage in the cells, which further led to cell cycle arrest and eventually resulted in cell death through apoptosis. These transcriptomic findings were subsequently corroborated by a variety of cellular assays, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and glutathione (GSH) depletion, DNA damage (pH2AX detection and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine [8-OH-dg] assay), cell cycle analysis, and caspase 3/7 activity. Collectively, the results of the current study accord with previous in vivo and in vitro findings, provide further evidence that oxidative stress-caused DNA damage contributes to usnic acid-induced hepatotoxicity, shed new light on molecular mechanisms of usnic acid-induced hepatotoxicity, and demonstrate the usefulness of iPSC-derived hepatocytes as an in vitro model for hepatotoxicity testing and prediction.

Hepatotoxicity of silver nanoparticles: Benchmark concentration modeling of an in vitro transcriptomics study in human iPSC-derived hepatocytes

Despite two decades of research on silver nanoparticle (AgNP) toxicity, a safe threshold for exposure has not yet been established, albeit being critically needed for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making. Traditionally, a point-of-departure (PoD) value is derived from dose response of apical endpoints in animal studies using either the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) approach, or benchmark dose (BMD) modeling. To develop new approach methodologies (NAMs) to inform human risk assessment of AgNPs, we conducted a concentration response modeling of the transcriptomic changes in hepatocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) after being exposed to a wide range concentration (0.01-25 μg/ml) of AgNPs for 24 h. A plausible transcriptomic PoD of 0.21 μg/ml was derived for a pathway related to the mode-of-action (MOA) of AgNPs, and a more conservative PoD of 0.10 μg/ml for a gene ontology (GO) term not apparently associated with the MOA of AgNPs. A reference dose (RfD) could be calculated from either of the PoDs as a safe threshold for AgNP exposure. The current study illustrates the usefulness of in vitro transcriptomic concentration response study using human cells as a NAM for toxicity study of chemicals that lack adequate toxicity data to inform human risk assessment.

Application of stem cells in the study of developmental and functional toxicity of endodermal-derived organs caused by nanoparticles

Nanoparticles have unique properties that make them useful in biomedicine. However, their extensive use raises concerns about potential hazards to the body. Therefore, it is crucial to establish effective and robust toxicology models to evaluate the developmental and functional toxicity of nanoparticles on the body. This article discusses the use of stem cells to study the developmental and functional toxicity of organs of endodermal origin due to nanoparticles. The study discovered that various types of nanoparticles have varying effects on stem cells. The application of stem cell models can provide a possibility for studying the effects of nanoparticles on organ development and function, as they can more accurately reflect the toxic mechanisms of different types of nanoparticles. However, stem cell toxicology systems currently cannot fully reflect the effects of nanoparticles on entire organs. Therefore, the establishment of organoid models and other advanced assessment models is expected to address this issue.

Experimental Methods for the Biological Evaluation of Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Risks

Many novel medical therapies use nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, including nanomaterials through drug delivery systems, diagnostics, or physiologically active medicinal products. The approval of nanoparticles with advanced therapeutic and diagnostic potentials for applications in medication and immunization depends strongly on their synthesizing procedure, efficiency of functionalization, and biological safety and biocompatibility. Nanoparticle biodistribution, absorption, bioavailability, passage across biological barriers, and biodistribution are frequently assessed using bespoke and biological models. These methods largely rely on in vitro cell-based evaluations that cannot predict the complexity involved in preclinical and clinical studies. Therefore, assessing the nanoparticle risk has to involve pharmacokinetics, organ toxicity, and drug interactions manifested at multiple cellular levels. At the same time, there is a need for novel approaches to examine nanoparticle safety risks due to increased constraints on animal exploitation and the demand for high-throughput testing. We focus here on biological evaluation methodologies that provide access to nanoparticle interactions with the organism (positive or negative via toxicity). This work aimed to provide a perception regarding the risks associated with the utilization of nanoparticle-based formulations with a particular focus on assays applied to assess the cytotoxicity of nanomaterials.

Where Is Nano Today and Where Is It Headed? A Review of Nanomedicine and the Dilemma of Nanotoxicology

Worldwide nanotechnology development and application have fueled many scientific advances, but technophilic expectations and technophobic demands must be counterbalanced in parallel. Some of the burning issues today are the following: (1) Where is nano today? (2) How good are the communication and investment networks between academia/research and governments? (3) Is there any spotlight application for nanotechnology? Nanomedicine is a particular arm of nanotechnology within the healthcare landscape, focused on diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of emerging (such as coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) and contemporary (including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and cancer) diseases. However, it may only represent the bright side of the coin. In fact, in the recent past, the concept of nanotoxicology has emerged to address the dark shadows of nanomedicine. The nanomedicine field requires more nanotoxicological studies to identify undesirable effects and guarantee safety. Here, we provide an overall perspective on nanomedicine and nanotoxicology as central pieces of the giant puzzle of nanotechnology. First, the impact of nanotechnology on education and research is highlighted, followed by market trends and scientific output tendencies. In the next section, the nanomedicine and nanotoxicology dilemma is addressed through the interplay of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo models with the support of omics and microfluidic approaches. Lastly, a reflection on the regulatory issues and clinical trials is provided. Finally, some conclusions and future perspectives are proposed for a clearer and safer translation of nanomedicines from the bench to the bedside.

Phenotypical, functional and transcriptomic comparison of two modified methods of hepatocyte differentiation from human induced pluripotent stem cells

Directed differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into hepatocytes could provide an unlimited source of liver cells, and therefore holds great promise for regenerative medicine, disease modeling, drug screening and toxicology studies. Various methods have been established during the past decade to differentiate human iPSCs into hepatocyte-like cells (HLCs) using growth factors and/or small molecules. However, direct comparison of the differentiation efficiency and the quality of the final HLCs between different methods has rarely been reported. In the current study, two hepatocyte differentiation methods were devised, termed Method 1 and 2, through modifying existing well-known hepatocyte differentiation strategies, and the resultant cells were compared phenotypically and functionally at different stages of hepatocyte differentiation. Compared to Method 1, higher differentiation efficiency and reproducibility were observed in Method 2, which generated highly homogeneous functional HLCs at the end of the differentiation process. The cells exhibited morphology closely resembling primary human hepatocytes and expressed high levels of hepatic protein markers. More importantly, these HLCs demonstrated several essential characteristics of mature hepatocytes, including major serum protein (albumin, fibronectin and α-1 antitrypsin) secretion, urea release, glycogen storage and inducible cytochrome P450 activity. Further transcriptomic comparison of the HLCs derived from the two methods identified 1,481 differentially expressed genes (DEGs); 290 Gene Ontology terms in the biological process category were enriched by these genes, which were further categorized into 34 functional classes. Pathway analysis of the DEGs identified several signaling pathways closely involved in hepatocyte differentiation of pluripotent stem cells, including 'signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells', 'Wnt signaling pathway', 'TGF-beta signaling pathway' and 'PI3K-Akt signaling pathway'. These results may provide a molecular basis for the differences observed between the two differentiation methods and suggest ways to further improve hepatocyte differentiation in order to obtain more mature HLCs for biomedical applications.

Current Strategies in Assessment of Nanotoxicity: Alternatives to In Vivo Animal Testing

Millions of experimental animals are widely used in the assessment of toxicological or biological effects of manufactured nanomaterials in medical technology. However, the animal consciousness has increased and become an issue for debate in recent years. Currently, the principle of the 3Rs (i.e., reduction, refinement, and replacement) is applied to ensure the more ethical application of humane animal research. In order to avoid unethical procedures, the strategy of alternatives to animal testing has been employed to overcome the drawbacks of animal experiments. This article provides current alternative strategies to replace or reduce the use of experimental animals in the assessment of nanotoxicity. The currently available alternative methods include in vitro and in silico approaches, which can be used as cost-effective approaches to meet the principle of the 3Rs. These methods are regarded as non-animal approaches and have been implemented in many countries for scientific purposes. The in vitro experiments related to nanotoxicity assays involve cell culture testing and tissue engineering, while the in silico methods refer to prediction using molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. The commonly used novel cell-based methods and computational approaches have the potential to help minimize the use of experimental animals for nanomaterial toxicity assessments.

Mutagenicity Evaluation of Nanoparticles by the Ames Assay

The Ames assay is a classic and robust method for identifying and evaluating chemical mutagens that reverse the mutations of Salmonella typhimurium and/or Escherichia coli bacteria strains with amino acid synthesis defects. It is also called the bacterial reverse mutation assay. Ames assay has been widely used for detecting genetic toxicity of many chemicals and gained increased applications in risk assessment of emerging environmental pollutants such as nanomaterials. In this chapter, we presented a detailed step-by-step method using the Ames assay to detect potential mutagenicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. The strategy to use the liver S9 fraction for bioactivation and a preincubation procedure is recommended. This method is easy to use to test genetic toxicity of other environmental contaminants and new chemicals.