2
|
Llaneza DH, Llaneza AJ, Kozlov E. Perceived Benefits and Barriers of mHealth Mindfulness Use for Caregivers of Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Qualitative Exploration. Clin Gerontol 2024; 47:66-77. [PMID: 36502294 PMCID: PMC11338273 DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2154728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mobile (mHealth) mindfulness-based interventions have the potential to be feasible, acceptable, effective, and scalable interventions for caregivers of people living with cognitive impairment. This qualitative study of caregivers of older adults with cognitive impairment explored caregivers' experiences using a mindfulness therapy mobile application. METHODS Fifteen caregivers were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Analysis was guided by the phenomenological approach and inductive-deductive analysis. RESULTS Six themes were generated from the data: convenience, barriers, perceived helpfulness, useful features, suggested app improvements, and skill transfer. Caregivers reported that the app was easy to use with many perceived benefits. Caregivers also noted some barriers to using the app. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that self-directed mHealth delivered mindfulness therapy may be a promising intervention for the caregivers involved in the study. Having the ability to use the app anywhere and at any time was a prominent reason for continued regular use for the participants. This was especially important to some caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The barriers discussed by the caregivers are important considerations for future app-based interventions for caregivers. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Clinicians can consider recommending mHealth mindfulness therapy to caregivers as a tool to provide caregivers with additional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle H. Llaneza
- Rutgers University, School of Public Health, Department of
Health, Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Amanda J. Llaneza
- Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Hudson
College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma
City, OK, USA
| | - Elissa Kozlov
- Rutgers University, School of Public Health, Department of
Health, Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Phang SKA, Betzler BK, Dan YR, Bin Abd Razak HR. Current evidence does not support the routine use of cognitive behavioural therapy in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2023; 42:102204. [PMID: 37449056 PMCID: PMC10336691 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is a significant dissatisfaction rate in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and poor mental health in patients is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to dissatisfaction. The aim was to review the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in improving pain and functional outcomes of patients undergoing TKA and highlight important aspects that may be crucial for improvement. Methods A systematic search was conducted in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies were included if they were randomized control trials that included patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral TKA, with CBT as an intervention compared against usual care, and reported outcomes in pain, knee function and any psychological outcomes as measured. Results Eight RCTs were selected which included 683 participants. The timings of CBT delivery, profiles of therapists, and outcome measures reported varied across the studies. Overall, 3 studies reported significant improvement in pain outcomes, 3 studies reported significant improvement in functional outcomes and 5 studies reported significant improvements in psychological outcomes. Conclusion Current evidence does not support the efficacy of CBT as current literature is too heterogenous. Further studies with homogenous CBT methods are required to further ascertain the true relationship between CBT and postoperative outcomes of TKA. Future studies should consider the points set out in this review, such as the importance of revisiting CBTskills, providing individualized therapy, having a supervisory team to support the fidelity of interventions, and identifying which group of patients would best benefit from CBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Kia-Ann Phang
- School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, 637551, Singapore
| | - Brjan Kaiji Betzler
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, 308232, Singapore
| | - Yuet-Ruh Dan
- School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, 637551, Singapore
| | - Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, 544886, Singapore
- Musculoskeletal Sciences Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, 169857, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Genugten CR, Schuurmans J, Hoogendoorn AW, Araya R, Andersson G, Baños R, Botella C, Cerga Pashoja A, Cieslak R, Ebert DD, García-Palacios A, Hazo JB, Herrero R, Holtzmann J, Kemmeren L, Kleiboer A, Krieger T, Smoktunowicz E, Titzler I, Topooco N, Urech A, Smit JH, Riper H. Examining the Theoretical Framework of Behavioral Activation for Major Depressive Disorder: Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. JMIR Ment Health 2021; 8:e32007. [PMID: 34874888 PMCID: PMC8727050 DOI: 10.2196/32007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioral activation (BA), either as a stand-alone treatment or as part of cognitive behavioral therapy, has been shown to be effective for treating depression. The theoretical underpinnings of BA derive from Lewinsohn et al's theory of depression. The central premise of BA is that having patients engage in more pleasant activities leads to them experiencing more pleasure and elevates their mood, which, in turn, leads to further (behavioral) activation. However, there is a dearth of empirical evidence about the theoretical framework of BA. OBJECTIVE This study aims to examine the assumed (temporal) associations of the 3 constructs in the theoretical framework of BA. METHODS Data were collected as part of the "European Comparative Effectiveness Research on Internet-based Depression Treatment versus treatment-as-usual" trial among patients who were randomly assigned to receive blended cognitive behavioral therapy (bCBT). As part of bCBT, patients completed weekly assessments of their level of engagement in pleasant activities, the pleasure they experienced as a result of these activities, and their mood over the course of the treatment using a smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) application. Longitudinal cross-lagged and cross-sectional associations of 240 patients were examined using random intercept cross-lagged panel models. RESULTS The analyses did not reveal any statistically significant cross-lagged coefficients (all P>.05). Statistically significant cross-sectional positive associations between activities, pleasure, and mood levels were identified. Moreover, the levels of engagement in activities, pleasure, and mood slightly increased over the duration of the treatment. In addition, mood seemed to carry over, over time, while both levels of engagement in activities and pleasurable experiences did not. CONCLUSIONS The results were partially in accordance with the theoretical framework of BA, insofar as the analyses revealed cross-sectional relationships between levels of engagement in activities, pleasurable experiences deriving from these activities, and enhanced mood. However, given that no statistically significant temporal relationships were revealed, no conclusions could be drawn about potential causality. A shorter measurement interval (eg, daily rather than weekly EMA reports) might be more attuned to detecting potential underlying temporal pathways. Future research should use an EMA methodology to further investigate temporal associations, based on theory and how treatments are presented to patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02542891, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02542891; German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00006866, https://tinyurl.com/ybja3xz7; Netherlands Trials Register, NTR4962, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/4838; ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT02389660, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02389660; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02361684, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02361684; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02449447, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02449447; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02410616, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02410616; ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN12388725, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12388725.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Rosalie van Genugten
- Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Josien Schuurmans
- Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Adriaan W Hoogendoorn
- Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ricardo Araya
- Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gerhard Andersson
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rosa Baños
- Polibienestar Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Institute of Health Carlos III, CIBERObn CB06 03/0052, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Cristina Botella
- Institute of Health Carlos III, CIBERObn CB06 03/0052, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jaume I University, Castellon de la Plana, Spain
| | - Arlinda Cerga Pashoja
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roman Cieslak
- Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland.,Lyda Hill Institute for Human Resilience, Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, United States
| | - David Daniel Ebert
- Department for Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Azucena García-Palacios
- Institute of Health Carlos III, CIBERObn CB06 03/0052, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jaume I University, Castellon de la Plana, Spain
| | - Jean-Baptiste Hazo
- Eceve, Unit 1123, Inserm, University of Paris, Paris, France.,Health Economics Research Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Rocío Herrero
- Polibienestar Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Institute of Health Carlos III, CIBERObn CB06 03/0052, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jérôme Holtzmann
- Mood Disorders and Emotional Pathologies Unit, Pôle de Psychiatrie, Neurologie et Rééducation Neurologique, University Hospital Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Lise Kemmeren
- Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annet Kleiboer
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Tobias Krieger
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ewelina Smoktunowicz
- Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ingrid Titzler
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Naira Topooco
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Centre for m2health, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Antoine Urech
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Johannes H Smit
- Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Heleen Riper
- Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Institute of Telepsychiatry, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Psychotherapies may work through techniques that are specific to each therapy or through factors that all therapies have in common. Proponents of the common factors model often point to meta-analyses of comparative outcome studies that show all therapies have comparable effects. However, not all meta-analyses support the common factors model; the included studies often have several methodological problems; and there are alternative explanations for finding comparable outcomes. To date, research on the working mechanisms and mediators of therapies has always been correlational, and in order to establish that a mediator is indeed a causal factor in the recovery process of a patient, studies must show a temporal relationship between the mediator and an outcome, a dose–response association, evidence that no third variable causes changes in the mediator and the outcome, supportive experimental research, and have a strong theoretical framework. Currently, no common or specific factor meets these criteria and can be considered an empirically validated working mechanism. Therefore, it is still unknown whether therapies work through common or specific factors, or both.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Reijnders
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcus J.H. Huibers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
MacDuffie KE, MacInnes J, Dickerson KC, Eddington KM, Strauman TJ, Adcock RA. Single session real-time fMRI neurofeedback has a lasting impact on cognitive behavioral therapy strategies. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2018; 19:868-875. [PMID: 29922575 PMCID: PMC6005804 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
To benefit from cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), individuals must not only learn new skills but also strategically implement them outside of session. Here, we tested a novel technique for personalizing CBT skills and facilitating their generalization to daily life. We hypothesized that showing participants the impact of specific CBT strategies on their own brain function using real-time functional magnetic imaging (rt-fMRI) neurofeedback would increase their metacognitive awareness, help them identify effective strategies, and motivate real-world use. In a within-subjects design, participants who had completed a clinical trial of a standardized course of CBT created a personal repertoire of negative autobiographical stimuli and mood regulation strategies. From each participant's repertoire, a set of experimental and control strategies were identified; only experimental strategies were practiced in the scanner. During the rt-fMRI neurofeedback session, participants used negative stimuli and strategies from their repertoire to manipulate activation in the anterior cingulate cortex, a region implicated in emotional distress. The primary outcome measures were changes in participant ratings of strategy difficulty, efficacy, and frequency of use. As predicted, ratings for unscanned control strategies were stable across observations, whereas ratings for experimental strategies changed after neurofeedback. At follow-up one month after the session, efficacy and frequency ratings for scanned strategies were predicted by neurofeedback during the rt-fMRI session. These results suggest that rt-fMRI neurofeedback created a salient and durable learning experience for patients, extending beyond the scan session to guide and motivate CBT skill use weeks later. This metacognitive approach to neurofeedback offers a promising model for increasing clinical benefits from cognitive behavioral therapy by personalizing skills and facilitating generalization. Participants watched their therapy skills change brain activation in real time. Rt-fMRI neurofeedback selectively predicted individual strategy efficacy ratings. Ratings for unscanned control strategies did not change pre/post neurofeedback. A single scan session changed metacognitions about therapy skills 4 weeks later.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E MacDuffie
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Jeff MacInnes
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Kathryn C Dickerson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Kari M Eddington
- Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States
| | - Timothy J Strauman
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - R Alison Adcock
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|