Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of AZD2171, an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)

Phase I study of cediranib, an oral VEGFR inhibitor, in combination with selumetinib, an oral MEK inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies

PURPOSE

Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway improves progression free survival in multiple advanced malignancies but durable responses are uncommon. Inhibition of the VEGF pathway at multiple levels of signal transduction may improve clinical outcomes. Preclinical data with cediranib, an inhibitor of all 3 VEGF receptors, in combination with selumetinib, an inhibitor of MEK 1/2, demonstrated improved tumor control experimentally. This phase I trial was designed to test the two agents in combination to evaluate the tolerability, safety and assess disease response.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid malignancies were enrolled into this phase I trial. Cediranib and selumetinib were dosed using a toxicity-adaptive isotonic design for the dose escalation/de-escalation of each agent. Both cediranib and selumetinib were administered daily and continuously. Cycles were 28 days in length.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled. At all dose levels, dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed, which limited dose escalation and further evaluation. The maximum tolerated dose of cediranib and selumetinib in combination could not be determined. The best response of stable disease was observed in eight patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cediranib and selumetinib in combination on a continuous schedule was not tolerable, with patients experiencing cardiovascular and other DLTs. Intermittent schedules may be needed to establish a safe and tolerable combination of cediranib and selumetinib.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cediranib

Cediranib potently and selectively inhibits all three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR-1, -2 and -3), and clinical studies have shown that it is effective in patients with ovarian cancer at a dose of 20 mg/day. Cediranib is absorbed moderately slowly; a high-fat meal reduced the cediranib area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) by 24% and maximum plasma concentration (C _max) by 33%. Cediranib binds to serum albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein; protein binding in human plasma is approximately 95%. The cediranib AUC and C _max increase proportionally with dose from 0.5 to 60 mg, and cediranib has linear pharmacokinetics (PK) over time. Cediranib is metabolized via flavin-containing monooxygenase 1 and 3 (FMO1, FMO3) and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A4. Cediranib and its metabolites are mainly excreted in faeces (59%), with <1% of unchanged drug being excreted in urine. The apparent oral clearance is moderate and the mean terminal half-life is 22 h. Cediranib is a substrate of multidrug resistance-1 (MDR1) protein (also known as P-glycoprotein [P-gp]). Coadministration with ketoconazole, a potent P-gp inhibitor, increases cediranib AUC at steady-state (AUC_ss) in patients by 21%, while coadministration with rifampicin, a potent inducer of P-gp, decreases cediranib AUC_ss by 39%. Administration of cediranib with chemotherapies demonstrated minimal PK impact on each other. No dose adjustment is recommended for patients with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment, and no dose adjustment is needed on the basis of age and body weight. A pooled analysis at doses of 0.5-60 mg showed no significant increase in QTc intervals. Increases in blood pressure and the incidence of diarrhoea were associated with increased cediranib dose and systemic exposure.

Population exposure-safety analysis of cediranib for Phase I and II studies in patients with cancer

AIMS

A multistudy analysis of cediranib, a potent, selective inhibitor of all three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR-1, -2 and -3), was conducted to establish population exposure-safety models for the relationship of cediranib exposure to the safety endpoints, diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP and SBP) and diarrhoea in cancer patients. These models were applied to predict safety outcomes for different cediranib dose regimens.

METHODS

Models for hypertension and diarrhoea were constructed based on data from 10 Phase I and three Phase II studies comprising 631 cancer patients following cediranib once-daily oral dosing. Daily DBP and SBP were simultaneously characterized using indirect response models for predicted cediranib concentration-time courses, while daily diarrhoea events were modelled as ordered categorical variables with a proportional odds model with a Markov element for predicted average cediranib concentrations.

RESULTS

For 20 mg cediranib once-daily oral administration, the mean increase in DBP and SBP was predicted to be 7 (95% CI 3-13) and 8 mmHg (95% CI 3-16), respectively, while the probability of mild diarrhoea, but not the severity, was predicted to increase over time. Severe diarrhoea was predicted to be resolved rapidly upon discontinuation of cediranib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximum blood pressure increase was observed within the first few days of cediranib treatment, consistent with the pharmacokinetic profile of cediranib reaching steady state in about 5 days. The probability of diarrhoea increased with cediranib concentration but was far more dependent on the status of diarrhoea predicted on the previous day.

Prediction of Apparent Oral Clearance of Small-Molecule Inhibitors in Pediatric Patients

The purpose of this study was to build regression models for the prediction of apparent oral clearance (CL/F) for small-molecule inhibitors in the pediatric population using data obtained from adults. Two approaches were taken; a simple allometric regression model which considers no interdrug or interindividual variability and an allometric regression model with mixed-effects modeling where some variability parameters are included in the model. Average CL/F values were obtained for 15 drugs at various dosages from 31 literatures (a total of 139 data sets) conducted in adults and for 15 drugs from 26 literatures (62 data sets) conducted in children. Data were randomly separated into the "modeling" or "validation" data set, and the 2 allometric regression models were applied to the modeling data set. The predictive ability of the models was examined by comparing the observed and model-predicted CL/F in children using the validation data set. The percentage root mean square error was 17.2% and 26.3% in the simple allometric regression model and the allometric regression model with mixed-effects modeling, respectively. The predictive ability of the 2 models seems acceptable, suggesting that they could be useful for predicting the CL/F of new small-molecule inhibitors and for determining adequate doses in clinical pharmacotherapy for children.

Population pharmacokinetic and exposure simulation analysis for cediranib (AZD2171) in pooled Phase I/II studies in patients with cancer

AIMS

A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed for cediranib to simulate cediranib exposure for different doses, including comedication with strong uridine glucuronosyl transferase/P-glycoprotein inducers such as rifampicin, in cancer patients.

METHODS

Plasma concentrations and covariates from 625 cancer patients after single or multiple oral cediranib administrations ranging from 0.5 to 90 mg in 19 Phase I and II studies were included in the analysis. Stepwise covariate modelling was used to develop the population PK model. The final model was used to simulate cediranib exposure in cancer patients to evaluate cediranib target coverage and the need for dose adjustment for covariates or coadministration with rifampicin.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption and first-order elimination adequately described the cediranib concentration-time courses. Body weight and age were identified as having statistically significant impact on cediranib PK, but only <21% impact on AUC and maximum concentrations. Simulated lower bounds of 90% prediction interval or median of unbound cediranib concentrations after cediranib 15 or 20 mg exceeded the IC₅₀ for vascular endothelial growth factor receptors-1, -2 and -3. Exposures of cediranib 20 or 30 mg with coadministration of rifampicin were comparable to those of 15 or 20 mg, respectively, without coadministration.

CONCLUSIONS

No covariate was identified to require dose adjustment for cediranib. Cediranib exposure following 15 or 20 mg daily dose administration is adequate overall for inhibition of in vitro estimated vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, -2 and -3 activities. An increase in cediranib dose may be needed for cediranib coadministered with strong uridine glucuronosyl transferase/P-glycoprotein inducers such as rifampicin.

Pharmacokinetic Aspects of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Scientists have identified the impact of angiogenesis on tumor growth and survival. Among other efficient drugs, several small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) have been developed and have already been integrated into the treatment of various advanced malignancies. This review provides a compilation of current knowledge on the pharmacokinetic aspects of all VEGFR-TKIs already approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and of those still under investigation. Additional information on substance metabolism, potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and the need for dose adaptation in patients with predominant renal and/or hepatic impairment has been included. All TKIs introduced in this review were administered orally, allowing for easy drug handling for healthcare professionals and patients. For almost all substances, the maximum plasma concentrations were reached within a short period of time. The majority of the substances showed a high plasma protein binding and their excretion occurred via the feces and, to a lesser extent, via the urine. In most cases, dose adaptation in patients with mild to moderate renal or hepatic impairment is not recommended. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 was found to play a crucial role in the drug metabolic processes of many compounds. In order to prevent unwanted DDIs, co-administration of VEGFR TKIs together with CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers should be avoided. Throughout all TKIs, the data indicate high inter-individual variability. The causes of this are still unclear and require further research to allow for individualization of treatment regimens.

A phase II study of cediranib, an oral VEGF inhibitor, in previously untreated patients with metastatic or recurrent malignant melanoma

PURPOSE

A two stage multi-institution Phase II study was undertaken by the Princess Margaret Hospital Consortium to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oral cediranib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 and 2, in patients with previously untreated advanced malignant melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between May 2006 and April 2008, 24 patients (median age 65 years) with advanced malignant melanoma were treated with oral cediranib. Cediranib was given on a continuous, oral once daily schedule of 45 mg, on a 28 day cycle.

RESULTS

Of the 17 patients evaluable for response, there was stable disease in 8 patients, and progressive disease in 9 patients, with no objective responses seen. Only 2 patients had stable disease >/= 6 months, thus the study was terminated at the end of stage 1 accrual. The overall median survival was 9.9 months, and the median time to progression was 3.5 months. The most frequent non-hematologic adverse events were hypertension (78%), fatigue (69%), diarrhea (69%) and anorexia and nausea (each 57%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although 2 patients had stable disease at 6 months, the short median time to progression and lack of any objective responses indicate that single agent cediranib at this dose and schedule is not sufficiently active to warrant study continuation.

A phase I trial and PK study of cediranib (AZD2171), an orally bioavailable pan-VEGFR inhibitor, in children with recurrent or refractory primary CNS tumors

BACKGROUND

Cediranib (AZD2171), an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor, was evaluated in this phase I study to determine its toxicity profile, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors.

METHODS

Children and adolescents <22 years were enrolled into one of two strata: stratum I—those not receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant drugs (EIACD) and stratum II—those receiving EIACDs. Dose-level selection was based on the continual reassessment method (CRM).

RESULTS

Thirty-six eligible patients with median age of 12.7 years (range, 5.4-21.7 years) in stratum I (24 males) and 12 patients (7 males) in stratum II with median age of 13.4 years (range, 8.9-19.5 years) were initially assessed over a 4-week DLT evaluation period, modified to 6 weeks during the study. An MTD of 32 mg/m(2)/day was declared; however, excessive toxicities (transaminitis, proteinuria, diarrhea, hemorrhage, palmer-planter syndrome, reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy) in the expansion cohort treated at this dose suggested that it might not be tolerated over a longer time period. An expansion cohort at 20 mg/m(2)/day also demonstrated poor longer-term tolerability. Diffusion and perfusion MRI and PET imaging variables as well as biomarker analysis were performed and correlated with outcome. At 20 mg/m(2)/day, the median plasma area under the concentration-time curve at steady state was lower than that observed in adults at similar dosages.

CONCLUSIONS

While the MTD of once daily oral cediranib in children with recurrent or progressive CNS tumors was initially defined as 32 mg/m(2)/day, this dose and 20 mg/m(2)/day were not considered tolerable over a protracted time period.

Receptor tyrosine kinases: Characterisation, mechanism of action and therapeutic interests for bone cancers

Bone cancers are characterised by the development of tumour cells in bone sites, associated with a dysregulation of their environment. In the last two decades, numerous therapeutic strategies have been developed to target the cancer cells or tumour niche. As the crosstalk between these two entities is tightly controlled by the release of polypeptide mediators activating signalling pathways through several receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), RTK inhibitors have been designed. These inhibitors have shown exciting clinical impacts, such as imatinib mesylate, which has become a reference treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia and gastrointestinal tumours. The present review gives an overview of the main molecular and functional characteristics of RTKs, and focuses on the clinical applications that are envisaged and already assessed for the treatment of bone sarcomas and bone metastases.

Anti-angiogenesis in prostate cancer: knocked down but not out

Angiogenesis is a very complex physiological process, which involves multiple pathways that are dependent on the homeostatic balance between the growth factors (stimulators and inhibitors). This tightly controlled process is stimulated by angiogenic factors, which are present within the tumor and surrounding tumor-associated stromal cells. The dependence of tumor propagation, invasion and metastasis on angiogenesis makes the inhibitors of new blood vessel formation attractive drugs for treating the malignancies. Angiogenesis can be disrupted by several distinct mechanisms: by inhibiting endothelial cells, by interrupting the signaling pathways or by inhibiting other activators of angiogenesis. This strategy has shown therapeutic benefit in several types of solid tumors, leading to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of anti-angiogenic agents in the treatment of kidney, non-small cell lung, colon and brain cancers. Although no angiogenesis inhibitors have been approved for patients with metastatic prostate cancer, therapies that target new blood vessel formation are still an emerging and promising area of prostate cancer research.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of prostate cancer: taking the next step in clinical development

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed, non-cutaneous malignancy in Western countries. Until recently, few therapeutic options were available for patients with advanced PCa. Although these treatments may delay progression of disease, none are curative. Therefore, research continues to investigate other treatments for advanced PCa. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been extensively studied as a treatment for multiple malignancies and may represent an additional strategy. In addition to limiting cellular proliferation and metastasis, there is also growing interest in using these treatments to impact the bone microenvironment and reduce associated morbidity from PCa.

AREAS COVERED

Several TKIs have been evaluated in the preclinical setting in advanced PCa. Targets reviewed include the epidermal growth factor family, VEGF receptor, c-Src family kinases, platelet-derived growth factor and c-Met.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite strong biological rationale for the use of TKIs therapy for the treatment of PCa, Phase III clinical trials have produced disappointing results. As TKI strategies move forward, the failures of past trials need to be better understood. New approaches with these treatments will also have to take into account modern anti-androgens and a treatment landscape that now includes immunotherapy.

Estimating the clinical risk of hypertension from VEGF signal inhibitors by a non-clinical approach using telemetered rats

Anti-angiogenic drugs that target Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) signaling pathways caused hypertension as an adverse effect in clinical studies. Since the hypertension may limit the benefit provided for patients, the demand for non-clinical research that predicts the clinical risk of the hypertension has risen greatly. To clarify whether non-clinical research using rats can appropriately estimate the clinical risk of hypertension caused by VEGF signal inhibitors, we investigated the hemodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics (PK) of the VEGF signal inhibitors cediranib (0.1, 3, and 10 mg/kg), sunitinib (5, 10, and 40 mg/kg), and sorafenib (0.1, 1, and 5 mg/kg) in telemetered rats and examined the correlation between the non-clinical and the clinical hypertensive effect. The VEGF signal inhibitors significantly elevated blood pressure (BP) in rats within a few days of the initiation of dosing, and levels recovered after dosing ended. The trend of the hypertension was similar to that in clinical studies. We found that the AUC at which BP significantly increased by approximately 10 mmHg in rats was comparable to the clinical AUC at which moderate to severe hypertension occurred. These results represent correlations between the non-clinical and the clinical hypertensive effect of VEGF signal inhibitors, suggesting that non-clinical research using telemetered rats would be an effective approach to predict the clinical risk of hypertension caused by VEGF signal inhibitors.

A randomized phase II study of cediranib alone versus cediranib in combination with dasatinib in docetaxel resistant, castration resistant prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Activation of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and the oncogenic Src pathway has been implicated in the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in preclinical models. Cediranib and dasatinib are multi-kinase inhibitors targeting VEGFR and Src respectively. Phase II studies of cediranib and dasatinib in CRPC have shown single agent activity.

METHODS

Docetaxel-pretreated CRPC patients were randomized to arm A: cediranib alone (20 mg/day) versus arm B: cediranib (20 mg/day) plus dasatinib (100 mg/day) given orally on 4-week cycles. Primary endpoint was 12-week progression-free survival (PFS) as per the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2). Patient reported outcomes were evaluated using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Present Pain Intensity (PPI) scales. Correlative studies of bone turnover markers (BTM), including bone alkaline phosphate (BAP) and serum beta-C telopeptide (B-CTx) were serially assayed. Results A total of 22 patients, 11 per arm, were enrolled. Baseline demographics were similar in both arms. Median number of cycles =4 in arm A (range 1-12) and 2 in arm B (range 1-9). Twelve-week PFS was 73 % in arm A versus 18 % in arm B (p = 0.03). Median PFS in months (arm A versus B) was: 5.2 versus 2.6 (95 % CI: 1.9-6.5 versus 1.4-not reached). Most common grade 3 toxicities were hypertension, anemia and thrombocytopenia in arm A and hypertension, diarrhea and fatigue in arm B. One treatment-related death (retroperitoneal hemorrhage) was seen in arm A. FACT-P and PPI scores did not significantly change in either arm. No correlation between BTM and PFS was seen in either arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited by small numbers, this randomized study showed that the combination of VEGFR and Src targeted therapy did not result in improved efficacy and may be associated with a worse outcome than VEGFR targeted therapy alone in patients with CRPC. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01260688.

Phase II clinical trial of cediranib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of cediranib, a highly potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study used a Simon two-stage trial design, which required at least two of 12 patients in the first cohort to be progression-free at 6 months. We enrolled a total of 35 evaluable patients who all received cediranib 20 mg orally daily. In a second cohort, 23 additional patients received prednisone 10 mg daily with cediranib. Endpoints included tumour response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), vascular permeability via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients were enrolled, of whom 67% had received two or more previous chemotherapy regimens. Six of 39 patients with measurable disease had confirmed partial responses and one had an unconfirmed partial response. At 6 months, 43.9% of patients were progression-free; the median PFS and OS periods for all patients were 3.7 months and 10.1 months, respectively. We found that the DCE-MRI variables baseline transport constant (Ktrans ) and rate constant at day 28 were significantly associated with PFS in univariate analyses, but only baseline Ktrans remained significant when considered jointly. The most frequent toxicities were hypertension, fatigue, anorexia and weight loss; the addition of prednisone reduced the incidence of constitutional toxicities.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that cediranib was generally well tolerated with some anti-tumour activity in highly pretreated patients with metastatic CRPC who had progressive disease after docetaxel-based therapy.

Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibition produces discordant changes between 99mTc-MDP bone scans and other disease biomarkers: analysis of a phase II study of sunitinib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

One of the central unanswered questions in prostate cancer research is the significance of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-induced improvements in (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate ((99m)Tc-MDP) bone scans. Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibition has recently shown promise in the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer. In some cases, TKI inhibition has produced unprecedented improvements in bone metastases as detected by (99m)Tc-MDP bone scans. The significance of these improvements is not known. In order to gain insight about the effects of TKIs on bone scans in prostate cancer, we systematically evaluated images from a phase II study of sunitinib, a multitargeted TKI.

METHODS

We analyzed images and data from a previously reported open-label phase II study that enrolled 34 men with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer. Participants received sunitinib in 6-wk cycles (50 mg daily; 4 wk on, 2 wk off). We examined baseline and 12-wk bone scan images. Partial response was defined as an improvement of at least 50% in previous metastatic lesions subjectively or a change from prior diffuse skeletal metastases (superscan) to recognizable individual metastatic lesions. Our primary objective was to define the incidence of at least partial bone scan response. We also examined concomitant changes in CT and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) evidence of disease.

RESULTS

Analysis at 12 wk revealed 1 partial response by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and 2 confirmed PSA responses. There were 25 subjects who underwent bone scans at both time points (baseline and week 12) and who had bone metastases detectable at baseline. Within that group of 25, we found 5 bone scan partial responses and 1 complete response. None of those 6 subjects exhibited a PSA response (≥50% decline from baseline) or RECIST response.

CONCLUSION

We found a relatively high rate of (99m)Tc-MDP bone scan response to sunitinib among men with metastatic prostate cancer. Further, we found that none of the subjects exhibiting bone scan responses experienced concordant improvements in PSA or CT evidence of disease by accepted criteria. This discordance argues that osteoblastic assessment provides an incomplete assessment of treatment-induced changes. Rational development of multitargeted TKIs for prostate cancer requires improved understanding of treatment-induced bone scan changes. Optimal imaging strategies may include evaluation of perfusion or direct tumor activity.

Cediranib (AZD2171) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II North Central Cancer Treatment Group Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

Vascular endothelial growth factor has been shown to be overexpressed in several studies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Cediranib is a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling. We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of cediranib in patients with HCC.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC were enrolled in this study. Patients received 45 mg of cediranib orally, once daily, for 28-day cycles. The primary objective of this phase II study was to assess 6-month survival. Secondary objectives were to assess tumor response, time to progression, and toxicity.

RESULTS

All 28 patients were evaluable for efficacy outcomes. Twelve patients (42.9%) survived 6 months, 15 (53.6%) died within 6 months, and 1 (3.6%) was lost to follow-up before 6 months. The median overall survival was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval, 3.4-7.3 mo). No patients experienced confirmed response. The median time to progression was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.4 mo). Twenty-six patients (93%) experienced a grade 3+ adverse event with the most common adverse event s being fatigue (46%), anorexia (25%), hypertension (21%), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (18%).

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to the toxicity, cediranib at this dose and schedule is not an effective treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC.

Cediranib inhibits both the intraosseous growth of PDGF D-positive prostate cancer cells and the associated bone reaction

BACKGROUND

The major cause of death in prostate cancer (PCa) cases is due to distant metastatic lesions, with the bone being the most prevalent site for secondary colonization. Utilization of small molecule inhibitors to treat bone metastatic PCa have had limited success either as monotherapies or in combination with other chemotherapeutics due to intolerable toxicities. In the current study, we developed a clinically relevant in vivo intraosseous tumor model overexpressing the platelet-derived growth factor D (PDGF D) to test the efficacy of a newly characterized vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)/PDGFR inhibitor, cediranib (also called AZD2171).

METHODS

An intratibial-injection model was established utilizing DU145 cells with or without increased PDGF D expression. Tumor-bearing mice were treated by daily gavage administration of cediranib and/or weekly i.p. injection of docetaxel for 7 weeks. Tibiae were monitored by in vivo/ex vivo X-rays and histomorphometry analysis was performed to estimate tumor volume and tumor-associated trabecular bone growth.

RESULTS

Cediranib reduced intraosseous growth of prostate tumors as well as tumor-associated bone responses. When compared to the standard chemotherapeutic agent docetaxel, cediranib exhibited a stronger inhibition of tumor-associated bone response. The efficacy of cediranib was further enhanced when the drug was co-administered with docetaxel. Importantly, the therapeutic benefits of cediranib and docetaxel are more prominent in intraosseous prostate tumors overexpressing PDGF D.

CONCLUSION

These novel findings support the utilization of cediranib, either alone or in combination with docetaxel, to treat bone metastatic PCa exhibiting PDGF D expression.

Targeting angiogenesis for the treatment of prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

While multiple therapies exist that prolong the lives of men with advanced prostate cancer, none are curative. This had led to a search to uncover novel targets for prostate cancer therapy, distinct from those of traditional hormonal approaches, chemotherapies, immunotherapies and bone-targeting approaches. The process of tumor angiogenesis is one target that is being exploited for therapeutic gain.

AREAS COVERED

The most promising anti-angiogenic approaches for treatment of prostate cancer, focusing on clinical development of selected agents. These include VEGF-directed therapies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, tumor-vascular disrupting agents, immunomodulatory drugs and miscellaneous anti-angiogenic agents. While none of these drugs have yet entered the market for the treatment of prostate cancer, several are now being tested in Phase III registrational trials.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of anti-angiogenic agents for prostate cancer has met with several challenges. This includes discordance between traditional prostate-specific antigen responses and clinical responses, which have clouded clinical trial design and interpretation, potential inadequate exposure to anti-angiogenic therapies with premature discontinuation of study drugs and the development of resistance to anti-angiogenic monotherapies. These barriers will hopefully be overcome with the advent of more potent agents, the use of dual angiogenesis inhibition and the design of more informative clinical trials.

Genetic polymorphisms in androgen receptor-binding sites predict survival in prostate cancer patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy

BACKGROUND

Activated androgen receptor binds to androgen-responsive elements (AREs) in genome to regulate target gene transcription and, consequently, mediates physiological or tumorigenic processes of the prostate. Our aim was to determine whether genetic variants in AREs are associated with clinical outcomes after androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We systematically investigated 55 common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genome-wide insilico-predicted AREs in a cohort of 601 men with advanced prostate cancer treated with ADT. The prognostic significance of these SNPs on disease progression, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) after ADT was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, two, five, and four SNPs were associated with disease progression, PCSM, and ACM, respectively. After adjusting for known prognostic factors, ARRDC3 rs2939244, FLT1 rs9508016, and SKAP1 rs6504145 remained as significant predictors for PCSM and FBXO32 rs7830622 and FLT1 rs9508016 remained as significant predictors for ACM in multivariate analysis. Moreover, strong combined genotype effects on PCSM and ACM were also observed (P(trend) < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that SNPs in AREs influence prostate cancer survival and may further advance our understanding of the disease progression.

Small-molecule protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer

The microenvironment is critical to the growth of prostate cancer (PCa) in the bone. Thus, for clinical efficacy, therapies must target tumor-microenvironment interactions. Several protein tyrosine kinases have been implicated in the development and growth of PCa bone metastasis. In this review, specific protein tyrosine kinases that regulate these complex interactions, including PDGFR, the EGFR family, c-Src, VEGFR, IGF-1R, FGFR and c-Met will be discussed, with an emphasis on why these kinases are promising therapeutic targets for metastatic PCa treatment. For each of these kinases, small-molecule inhibitors have reached clinical trials. Current results of these trials and future prospects for the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of PCa bone metastases are also discussed.

Phase II study of cediranib in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: SWOG S0509

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) tumors express vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptors. We conducted a phase II study of the oral pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, cediranib, in patients with MPM after platinum-based systemic chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with MPM previously treated with a platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen and a performance status 0 to 2 were eligible for enrollment. Cediranib 45 mg/d was administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was response rate. Tumor measurements were made by RECIST criteria, with a subset analysis conducted using modified RECIST. A two-stage design with an early stopping rule based on response rate was used.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were enrolled. Of 47 evaluable patients, 4 patients (9%) had objective responses, 16 patients (34%) had stable disease, 20 patients (43%) had disease progression, 2 patients (4%) had symptomatic deterioration, and 1 patient (2%) had early death. The most common toxicities were fatigue (64%), diarrhea (64%), and hypertension (70%); 91% of patients required a dose reduction. Median overall survival was 9.5 months, 1-year survival was 36%, and median progression-free survival was 2.6 months.

CONCLUSION

Cediranib monotherapy has modest single-agent activity in MPM after platinum-based therapy. However, some patient tumors were highly sensitive to cediranib. This study provides a rationale for further testing of cediranib plus chemotherapy in MPM and highlights the need to identify a predictive biomarker for cediranib.

MET and VEGF: synergistic targets in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Recent advances in the treatment of prostate cancer have resulted in improved outcomes, including longer survival, but new options are needed for treating patients with castration-resistant disease, particularly in the presence of bone metastasis. Data from preclinical models and clinical biomarker studies indicate that antiangiogenic agents should be a promising treatment for this patient population, and multiple agents in this class have demonstrated activity in early-stage clinical trials. Pivotal trials in prostate cancer with agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling have resulted in significant improvements in tumour response and progression-free survival. However, overall survival was not significantly improved. Recent preclinical studies suggest that the limited impact on overall survival may result from the development of evasive resistance after inhibition of angiogenesis, possibly through upregulation of MET (hepatocyte growth factor receptor) signalling. MET plays important roles in angiogenesis, tumour cell invasion and bone metastasis, all of which are key factors in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Inhibition of both the MET and VEGF pathways may improve the efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors in prostate cancer.

Emerging therapeutic approaches in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Although treatment options for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) have improved with the recent and anticipated approvals of novel immunotherapeutic, hormonal, chemotherapeutic and bone-targeted agents, clinical benefit with these systemic therapies is transient and survival times remain unacceptably short. Thus, we devote the second section of this two-part review to discussing emerging therapeutic paradigms and research strategies that are entering phase II and III clinical testing for men with metastatic CRPC. We will discuss a range of emerging hormonal, immunomodulatory, antiangiogenic, epigenetic and cell survival pathway inhibitors in current clinical trials, with an emphasis on how these therapies may complement our existing treatment options.

Targeted agents in ovarian cancer

Despite recent advances in the treatment of ovarian cancer, a large majority of women with this diagnosis will die from recurrence of their disease. Targeted therapies, in the form of monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors have significantly altered the management of many solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. No such agents have been approved by the US FDA for use in ovarian cancer, although Phase II data suggests excellent single-agent activity of some of these drugs. Antiangiogenic agents in combination with chemotherapy are being evaluated in Phase III clinical trials, both in the adjuvant setting and in recurrent platinum-sensitive disease. Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors are promising agents in BRCA1/2-mutated breast and ovarian cancers. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring the anti-tumor effect of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors administered as single agents and in combination with chemotherapy. Many other new drugs are in earlier grades of development. In this article, we review the state of the art in targeted therapies for ovarian cancer and identify future directions for their development in the management of this often devastating disease.

A phase II double-blind study to investigate efficacy and safety of two doses of the triple angiokinase inhibitor BIBF 1120 in patients with relapsed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To assess the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of BIBF 1120 in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic relapsed NSCLC in whom first- or second-line platinum-based chemotherapy failed were randomly allocated to daily 250 mg BIBF 1120 b.i.d. or 150 mg BIBF 1120 b.i.d. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective tumour response (RECIST). Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) were reported.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients received BIBF 1120. Median PFS was 6.9 weeks, with no significant difference between treatment arms. Median overall survival (OS) was 21.9 weeks. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1 patients (n = 56) had a median PFS of 11.6 weeks and a median OS of 37.7 weeks. Tumour stabilisation was achieved in 46% of patients (ECOG 0-1 patients: 59%), with one confirmed partial response (250 mg b.i.d.). Most commonly reported drug-related AEs were nausea (57.5%), diarrhoea (47.9%), vomiting (42.5%), anorexia (28.8%), abdominal pain (13.7%) and reversible alanine transaminase (13.7%) and aspartate aminotransferase elevations (9.6%). BIBF 1120 displayed dose-linear pharmacokinetic characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Continuous treatment with BIBF 1120 was well tolerated, with no difference in efficacy between treatment arms. PFS and objective response with single-agent treatment in advanced disease warrants further exploration.

A phase 1 trial and pharmacokinetic study of cediranib, an orally bioavailable pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors

PURPOSE

To determine the toxicity profile, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cediranib administered orally, once daily, continuously in children and adolescents with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors, excluding primary brain tumors, were eligible. DLT at the starting dose of 12 mg/m(2)/d resulted in de-escalation to 8 mg/m(2)/d and subsequent re-escalation to 12 and 17 mg/m(2)/d. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed during cycle 1. Response was evaluated using WHO criteria.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (median age, 15 years; range, 8 to 18 years) were evaluable for toxicity. DLTs (grade 3 nausea, vomiting, fatigue in one; hypertension and prolonged corrected QT interval in another) occurred in patients initially enrolled at 12 mg/m(2)/d. Subsequently, 8 mg/m(2)/d was well tolerated in three patients. An additional seven patients were enrolled at 12 mg/m(2)/d; one had DLT (grade 3 diarrhea). At 17 mg/m(2)/d, two of four patients had DLTs (grade 3 nausea; intolerable grade 2 fatigue). Non-dose-limiting toxicities included left ventricular dysfunction, elevated thyroid stimulating hormone, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, weight loss, and headache. The MTD of cediranib was 12 mg/m(2)/d (adult fixed dose equivalent, 20 mg). At 12 mg/m(2)/d, the median area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) was 900 ng·h/mL, which is similar to adults receiving 20 mg. Objective responses were observed in patients with Ewing sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and osteosarcoma.

CONCLUSION

The recommended monotherapy dose of cediranib for children with extracranial solid tumors is 12 mg/m(2)/d administered orally, once daily, continuously. A phase II study is in development.

Angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer remains a significant public health problem, with limited therapeutic options in the setting of castrate-resistant metastatic disease. Angiogenesis inhibition is a relatively novel antineoplastic approach, which targets the reliance of tumor growth on the formation of new blood vessels. This strategy has been used successfully in other solid tumor types, with the FDA approval of anti-angiogenic agents in breast, lung, colon, brain, and kidney cancer. The application of anti-angiogenic therapy to prostate cancer is reviewed in this article, with attention to efficacy and toxicity results from several classes of anti-angiogenic agents. Ultimately, the fate of anti-angiogenic agents in prostate cancer rests on the eagerly anticipated results of several key phase III studies.

Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B): a novel attack on angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is a critical hallmark of malignancy, and attempts to inhibit this process have characterized the age of biologic anticancer therapies for solid tumors. VEGF receptor-2 is the premier receptor responsible for many of the cancer-driven VEGF-induced spectrum of biologic changes, including modification of blood vessel structure and function, proliferation and migration. Unlike all clinically approved angiogenesis inhibitors, the fully human monoclonal antibody ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) specifically and potently inhibits VEGF receptor-2. Phase I clinical trials have shown safety across a wide range of ramucirumab doses with impressive, albeit early, evidence of both stable disease and partial responses in a variety of tumor types. In this article, we review the current data on ramucirumab and make comparisons with commercially available antiangiogenic agents.

Angiogenesis as a strategic target for prostate cancer therapy

It is becoming increasingly clear that angiogenesis plays a crucial role in prostate cancer (CaP) survival, progression, and metastasis. Tumor angiogenesis is a hallmark of advanced cancers and an attractive treatment target in multiple solid tumors. By understanding the molecular basis of resistance to androgen withdrawal and chemotherapy in CaP, the rational design of targeted therapeutics is possible. This review summarizes the recent advancements that have improved our understanding of the role of angiogenesis in CaP metastasis and the potential therapeutic efficacy of inhibiting angiogenesis in this disease. Current therapeutic options for patients with metastatic hormone-refractory CaP are very limited. Targeting vasculature is a developing area, which shows promise for the control of late stage and recurrent CaP disease and for overcoming drug resistance. We discuss angiogenesis and its postulated mechanisms and focus on the regulation of angiogenesis in CaP progression and the therapeutic beneficial effects associated with targeting of the CaP vasculature to overcome the resistance to current treatments and CaP recurrence.

Novel VEGF signalling inhibitors: how helpful are biomarkers in their early development?

BACKGROUND

The development of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors of tumour angiogenesis can only be described as prolific. It is therefore interesting to speculate which will reach the clinic. Of course, the most effective agents will succeed, but how is effectiveness measured? When presented with a summary of competitive compounds, it can be difficult to discriminate between their potency on target, toxicity and response rates.

OBJECTIVES

A comparison was undertaken between new small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor as one of their targets. Factors considered included mode of action (targets), toxicity and usefulness of biomarker data.

METHODOLOGY

We carried out a systematic review using PubMed, MEDLINE and American Society of Clinical Oncologist (ASCO) databases for articles (including abstracts) presented in 2007 - 2009. Search terms included 'angiogenesis inhibitors', 'tyrosine kinase inhibitors', 'VEGF' and 'biomarkers'. Nine compounds were selected for detailed comparison.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The toxicity profiles of the compounds were similar. Many exposure biomarkers have been identified that have informed the dose and scheduling of these compounds in clinical trials. Progress has also been made in identifying potential efficacy and predictive biomarkers for these new agents; however, these are yet to be validated.

VEGF inhibitors and prostate cancer therapy

Prostate cancer remains the most common non-cutaneous malignancy among American men. Since the advent of PSA testing, most men are diagnosed with localized disease, but a proportion of men will be diagnosed with metastatic disease, many will eventually receive chemotherapy with docetaxel and prednisone. However, responses are not durable and all men will ultimately progress on this treatment. As such, continued efforts are geared towards the discovery of new agents and mechanisms of targeting prostate cancer. Angiogenesis has been shown to play an important role in tumorigenesis, proliferation and metastasis in prostate cancer. Here we discuss the major angiogenic signaling pathway involving VEGF in prostate cancer progression and the role of various promising agents that targets this pathway. This includes bevacizumab, thalidomide and its analogues, tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib and AZD2171, and other inhibitors of angiogenic signaling pathways. Results of key clinical trials associated with the use of these agents and future directions are discussed herein.

Angiogenesis inhibition in prostate cancer: current uses and future promises

Angiogenesis has been well recognized as a fundamental part of a multistep process in the evolution of cancer progression, invasion, and metastasis. Strategies for inhibiting angiogenesis have been one of the most robust fields of cancer investigation, focusing on the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family and its receptors. There are numerous regulatory drug approvals to date for the use of these agents in treating a variety of solid tumors. While therapeutic efficacy has been established, challenges remain with regards to overcoming resistance and assessing response to antiangiogenic therapies. Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy among American men and angiogenesis plays a role in disease progression. The use of antiangiogenesis agents in prostate cancer has been promising and is hereby explored.

Phase I pharmacologic and biologic study of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2

PURPOSE To evaluate the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary anticancer activity of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), a fully human immunoglobulin G(1) monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated once weekly with escalating doses of ramucirumab. Blood was sampled for PK studies throughout treatment. The effects of ramucirumab on circulating vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), soluble VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, tumor perfusion, and vascularity using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were assessed. Results Thirty-seven patients were treated with 2 to 16 mg/kg of ramucirumab. After one patient each developed dose-limiting hypertension and deep venous thrombosis at 16 mg/kg, the next lower dose (13 mg/kg) was considered the MTD. Nausea, vomiting, headache, fatigue, and proteinuria were also noted. Four (15%) of 27 patients with measurable disease had a partial response (PR), and 11 (30%) of 37 patients had either a PR or stable disease lasting at least 6 months. PKs were characterized by dose-dependent elimination and nonlinear exposure consistent with saturable clearance. Mean trough concentrations exceeded biologically relevant target levels throughout treatment at all dose levels. Serum VEGF-A increased 1.5 to 3.5 times above pretreatment values and remained in this range throughout treatment at all dose levels. Tumor perfusion and vascularity decreased in 69% of evaluable patients. CONCLUSION Objective antitumor activity and antiangiogenic effects were observed over a wide range of dose levels, suggesting that ramucirumab may have a favorable therapeutic index in treating malignancies amenable to VEGFR-2 inhibition.

Angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of prostate cancer

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Prostate carcinoma is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy in U.S. men. The efficacy of docetaxel and prednisone in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has been shown to improve overall survival; however, its effect is not durable, highlighting the need for new therapies.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We will review the development of some of the leading compounds with direct and indirect antiangiogenic activity in prostate cancer including antibodies to VEGF and its receptors, small-molecule inhibitors of downstream signaling, immunomodulatory drugs with antiangiogenic activity, and compounds thought to directly inhibit or destroy vascular endothelial cells.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain a basic understanding of the role of angiogenesis in prostate cancer growth and metastasis. Current and potential targets of angiogenesis and their corresponding drugs under development for prostate cancer are discussed.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

There are now multiple early-phase clinical trials of antiangiogenic agents alone or in combination in prostate cancer. Several of these agents are now in Phase III development. Combined therapy with two antiangiogenic compounds may improve the activity of either compound alone. Multiple targets in the angiogenesis pathway continue to be elucidated and should remain an active area of investigation for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Angiogenesis inhibition in the treatment of prostate cancer

For many men, prostate cancer is an indolent disease that, even without definitive therapy, may have no impact on their quality of life or overall survival. However for those men who are either diagnosed with or eventually develop metastatic disease, prostate cancer is a painful and universally fatal disease. Testosterone-lowering hormonal therapy may control the disease for some time, but patients eventually develop resistance and progress clinically. At this point, only docetaxel has been shown to improve survival, so clearly additional therapeutic options are needed. Angiogenesis inhibition is an active area of clinical research in prostate cancer. Without angiogenesis, tumors have insufficient nutrients and oxygen to grow larger than a few millimeters and are potentially less likely to metastasize. In prostate cancer in particular, angiogenesis plays a significant role in tumor proliferation, and markers of angiogenesis appear to have prognostic significance. Several different compounds have been developed to inhibit angiogenesis, including monoclonal antibodies, multitargeted kinase inhibitors, and fusion proteins. In addition, more traditional agents may also have an impact on angiogenesis. Trials studying antiangiogenic agents have been conducted in localized and advanced prostate cancer. There are several large, ongoing phase III trials in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The findings of these and future studies will ultimately determine the role of angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Randomized, double-blind trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with either daily oral cediranib or placebo in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: NCIC clinical trials group BR24 study

PURPOSE This phase II/III double-blind study assessed efficacy and safety of cediranib with standard chemotherapy as initial therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the serum concentration-time curve 6) were given every 3 weeks, with daily oral cediranib or placebo at 30 mg (first 45 patients received 45 mg). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome of the phase II interim analysis; phase III would proceed if the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS < or = 0.77 and toxicity were acceptable. Results A total of 296 patients were enrolled, 251 to the 30-mg cohort. The phase II interim analysis demonstrated a significantly higher response rate (RR) for cediranib than for placebo, HR of 0.77 for PFS, no excess hemoptysis, and a similar number of deaths in each arm. The study was halted to review imbalances in assigned causes of death. In the primary phase II analysis (30-mg cohort), the adjusted HR for PFS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.56 to 1.08) with a higher RR for cediranib than for placebo (38% v 16%; P < .0001). Cediranib patients had more hypertension, hypothyroidism, hand-foot syndrome, and GI toxicity. Hypoalbuminemia, age > or = 65 years, and female sex predicted increased toxicity. Survival update (N = 296) 10 months after study unblinding favored cediranib over placebo (median of 10.5 months v 10.1 months; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.06; P = .11). Causes of death in the cediranib 30-mg cohort were NSCLC (81%), protocol toxicity +/- NSCLC (13%), and other (6%); for the placebo group, they were 98%, 0%, and 2%, respectively. CONCLUSION The addition of cediranib to carboplatin/paclitaxel results in improved response and PFS, but does not appear tolerable at a 30-mg dose. Consequently, the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group initiated a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cediranib 20 mg with carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced NSCLC.

Cediranib: profile of a novel anti-angiogenic agent in patients with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment strategies targeting angiogenesis have revealed promising results in preclinical studies and early clinical trials in patients with glioblastomas.

OBJECTIVE

This review evaluates the preclinical and clinical data for cediranib (AZD2171), a potent oral inhibitor of the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase.

METHODS

We summarize both preclinical and clinical data for cediranib, with a focus on the treatment of glioblastomas.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Cediranib is an effective drug in patients with glioblastoma, acting through inhibition of angiogenesis and normalization of tumor vasculature. Reduction of vasogenic brain edema is a key component of its treatment effect in this patient population. The primary side effects of cediranib include fatigue, diarrhea and hypertension.

An overview of small-molecule inhibitors of VEGFR signaling

VEGFR inhibitors are in broad use for the treatment of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors and hepatocellular carcinoma and in development in a number of other oncology indications, including colorectal cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, thyroid malignancies, ovarian cancer, breast cancer and sarcomas. This Review outlines the structure-activity relationships of the 44 VEGFR inhibitors currently in development. An overview of the pharmacokinetic profile of each molecule and its stage in development is provided. Phase III clinical trials being conducted for licensing of these agents for specific indications and phase III developmental efficacy trials are described in detailed tables that include the disease studied, trial design including combination therapy, study end points, and projected or final accrual. The relative frequency of on-target and off-target adverse events observed in 3,060 patients is described for a subset of agents in development in clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. No interagent comparisons were undertaken and no data from pharmaceutical pharmacovigilance databases were used. The on-target effects seem to be mechanistically based and predicted by VEGFR inhibition. Small-molecule inhibitors of angiogenesis are active in a wide variety of malignancies and fill a unique niche for cancer therapeutics.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of vandetanib plus docetaxel/prednisolone in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Vandetanib (ZACTIMA) is a once-daily oral anticancer drug that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and rearranged during transfection signaling. This randomized (1:1), double-blind study evaluated vandetanib (100 mg/day) or placebo in combination with docetaxel (D; 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) and prednisolone (P; 2 x 5 mg/day) in 86 patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (mHRPC). The primary assessment was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (confirmed reduction of >or=50% from baseline) and a greater number of patients showed a PSA response with placebo + DP (67%) versus vandetanib + DP (40%); hazard ratio = 2.23 (one-sided 80% confidence limit = 2.90; one-sided p = 0.99). More patients experienced progression events (disease progression or death from any cause) with vandetanib + DP (65%) versus placebo + DP (60%); hazard ratio = 1.13 (one-sided 80% confidence limit = 1.44; one-sided p = 0.67). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups, although more patients experienced adverse events, leading to permanent discontinuation with vandetanib + DP (28%) versus placebo + DP (12%). However, the safety and tolerability profile for vandetanib was similar to that previously reported; adverse events that occurred more frequently in the vandetanib + DP arm were hypertension (14% vs. 2%), erythematous rash (14% vs. 2%), and exfoliative rash (12% vs. 2%). In this study of patients with mHRPC, vandetanib + DP did not demonstrate any efficacy benefit, compared with placebo + DP.

Current status of cediranib: the rapid development of a novel anti-angiogenic therapy

Angiogenesis, the process whereby tumors develop new blood vessels to facilitate growth and metastasis, is a pivotal event in tumorigenesis. It is tightly regulated by the VEGF system. Cediranib (AZD2171, Recentin; AstraZeneca, London, UK) is a novel and potent small-molecule inhibitor of VEGF signaling, with activity against the three VEGF receptors, as well as other targets. This article provides a comprehensive and up-to-date synopsis of all pertinent preclinical and clinical studies detailing this promising new therapy.

VEGF kinase inhibitors: how do they cause hypertension?

Neoangiogenesis is a critical phenomenon enabling the growth and metastasis of tumors, and inhibitors of neoangiogenesis have been recently added to the armamentarium of anticancer therapies available for clinical use. Dysregulated signaling through the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway has been implicated as a key mediator of neoangiogenesis in tumors. Agents that block signaling through the VEGF pathway demonstrated tumor shrinkage in preclinical models and were therefore developed as anticancer therapies for use in humans. VEGF kinase inhibitors are being used in the treatment of a wide variety of cancers, and recent studies have shown that patients will likely require long-term treatment with these agents. Hypertension has emerged as a frequent side effect associated with agents that block signaling through the VEGF pathway. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms underlying hypertension is crucial to developing appropriate therapeutic strategies for treating hypertension associated with VEGF kinase inhibitors. Several recent studies have advanced our understanding of the pathophysiology of hypertension associated with VEGF kinase inhibitors and will be the subject of this review.

Anti-angiogenesis approach to genitourinary cancer treatment

Angiogenesis plays a crucial role in the survival, proliferation, and metastatic potential of several tumors, including genitourinary (GU) cancers. Over the last decade, increasing basic science and clinical research have led to the approval of several angiogenesis inhibitors. GU tumors are unique in its pathogenesis whereby specific pathways, such as involvement of the Von Hippel-Lindau gene in clear cell renal cell cancer and aberrant overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor in prostatic cancers and transitional cell bladder cancers, allow for potential targeting using angiogenesis inhibitors. This review discusses the biologic pathways as well as the rationale for using angiogenesis inhibitors in renal cell, prostate, and transitional cell bladder cancers. This review also focuses on pivotal trials and emerging data on the use of these inhibitors.

The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor cediranib (Recentin; AZD2171) inhibits endothelial cell function and growth of human renal tumor xenografts

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to examine the therapeutic potential of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling inhibitor cediranib in a human model of renal cell carcinoma (Caki-1).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The effects of cediranib treatment on in vitro endothelial cell function (proliferation, migration, and tube formation), as well as in vivo angiogenesis and tumor growth, were determined.

RESULTS

In vitro, cediranib significantly impaired the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells and their ability to form tubes, but had no effect on the proliferation of Caki-1 tumor cells. In vivo, cediranib significantly reduced Caki-1 tumor cell-induced angiogenesis, reduced tumor perfusion, and inhibited the growth of Caki-1 tumor xenografts.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results are consistent with the notion that inhibition of VEGF signaling leads to an indirect (i.e., antiangiogenic) antitumor effect, rather than a direct effect on tumor cells. These results further suggest that inhibition of VEGF signaling with cediranib may impair the growth of renal cell carcinoma.