The challenge of developmentally appropriate care: predictive genetic testing in young people for familial adenomatous polyposis

Cancer predisposing syndromes in childhood and adolescence pose several challenges necessitating interdisciplinary care in dedicated programs

Introduction

Genetic disposition is a major etiologic factor in childhood cancer. More than 100 cancer predisposing syndromes (CPS) are known. Surveillance protocols seek to mitigate morbidity and mortality. To implement recommendations in patient care and to ascertain that the constant gain of knowledge forces its way into practice specific pediatric CPS programs were established.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed data on children, adolescents, and young adults referred to our pediatric CPS program between October 1, 2021, and March 31, 2023. Follow-up ended on December 31, 2023.

Results

We identified 67 patients (30 male, 36 female, 1 non-binary, median age 9.5 years). Thirty-five patients were referred for CPS surveillance, 32 for features suspicious of a CPS including café-au-lait macules (n = 10), overgrowth (n = 9), other specific symptoms (n = 4), cancer suspicious of a CPS (n = 6), and rare neoplasms (n = 3). CPS was confirmed by clinical criteria in 6 patients and genetic testing in 7 (of 13). In addition, 6 clinically unaffected at-risk relatives were identified carrying a cancer predisposing pathogenic variant. A total of 48 patients were eventually diagnosed with CPS, surveillance recommendations were on record for 45. Of those, 8 patients did not keep their appointments for various reasons. Surveillance revealed neoplasms (n = 2) and metachronous tumors (n = 4) by clinical (n = 2), radiological examination (n = 2), and endoscopy (n = 2). Psychosocial counselling was utilized by 16 (of 45; 35.6%) families.

Conclusions

The diverse pediatric CPSs pose several challenges necessitating interdisciplinary care in specified CPS programs. To ultimately improve outcome including psychosocial well-being joint clinical and research efforts are necessary.

Adolescent and Young Adult Understanding of Their Childhood Cancer Predisposition Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study

We characterized germline genetic test result understanding in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) (n = 21) with cancer 1-3.9 years post-disclosure using semistructured qualitative interviews. Most AYAs articulated their cancer risk; however, 5 did not remember results and a subset demonstrated misperceptions regarding risk or confusion regarding their medical care. These findings highlight variability in AYA understanding warranting further inquiry.

[Surgical strategies for hereditary colorectal cancer]

Hereditary colorectal cancer (hCRC) represents a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In addition to the usual diagnostic methods, the family history, histological confirmation and mutation analysis play an important role in identifying the type of hereditary CRC. The diagnosis and classification of hCRC are carried out based on the anamnesis, clinical presentation and histology and the further treatment is determined depending on the underlying type of hCRC. For familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) coloproctomucosectomy after the end of puberty is always recommended, whereas the treatment recommendations for other forms, such as attenuated FAP (aFAP), MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome), range from close surveillance and endoscopic control, through segmental resection up to colectomy. Irrespective of the type of hCRC, the treatment regimens necessitate an individualized approach and require close interdisciplinary cooperation. When colorectal resection is performed, minimally invasive procedures should principally be prioritized and some studies could demonstrate a potential benefit of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopy.

Experiences With Genetic Counseling, Testing, and Diagnosis Among Adolescents With a Genetic Condition: A Scoping Review

IMPORTANCE

The number of adolescents who are diagnosed with a genetic disorder is increasing as genome sequencing becomes the standard of clinical diagnostic testing. However, the experience of receiving a diagnosis of a genetic condition has not been extensively studied in adolescents.

OBJECTIVE

To identify how adolescents with a genetic condition engage with genetic or genomic counseling services as well as interpret, adapt to, and experience their diagnosis.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO was undertaken. Articles (primary literature, knowledge syntheses, and gray literature) in English that investigated the experiences of adolescents between 10 and 19 years of age who received genetic or genomic counseling were included. Data were extracted from 45 eligible articles and analyzed descriptively.

FINDINGS

A total of 45 studies were included, most of which were quantitative in nature (21 of 45 [47%]) and conducted in the US (n = 13), followed by the UK (n = 8), Australia (n = 8), and Canada (n = 6). A total of 29 distinct monogenic disorders were investigated. Sample sizes ranged from 1 to 930, with a median of 23 participants, and the year of publication ranged from 1977 to 2019. Included studies addressed all aspects of genetic counseling, but a preponderance of articles assessed knowledge about genetic conditions (n = 17) and challenges of communication within families (n = 16). Fewer articles addressed the experiences of adolescents adapting to their genetic conditions (n = 8) and the genetic counseling process (n = 4). Only 1 study addressed any aspect of genetic counseling in relation to genome sequencing.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This scoping review found that most of the included studies focused on adolescents' knowledge about their genetic condition and communication about genetic risks, whereas fewer studies explored their adaptation to the condition and the genetic counseling process. A systematic reconsideration of the genetic counseling process may be undertaken to provide an evidence-informed health care service that is tailored to the needs of this adolescent population.

Education in youth-friendly genetic counseling

Genetic counselors have long recognized the challenges of working with adolescents and young adults (AYA) and their families. In 2010, a framework of Youth-friendly Genetic Counseling was developed by an expert reference group with the aim to improve both care for AYAs and the experience of health professionals delivering that care. Subsequently, an education workshop was developed aimed to upskill genetic health professionals in youth-friendly genetic counseling. The workshop was piloted with genetic counselors in Australia and New Zealand. A purpose designed, pre- and post-workshop survey and post-workshop focus group was utilized for evaluation. Mean confidence scores increased pre- and post-workshop. Participants also demonstrated increases in knowledge regarding: adolescent development; developmental theory; social factors impacting on health; the needs of young people; practice challenges; youth-friendly engagement, communication, consent and confidentiality; practice approaches; principles of adolescent healthcare; ethical issues; and available services and resources. Focus group data revealed several themes relating to practice challenges, learning gains, barriers, and enablers to clinical translation and workshop feedback. Results demonstrate utility of the workshop in up-skilling genetic health professionals in the provision of youth-friendly genetic counseling. Consideration of adaptation and sustainability, by embedding this theoretical and skills-based workshop as a module within genetic counseling education, is required to ensure practice competence and the best health outcomes for young people and their families.

A framework for youth-friendly genetic counseling

Young people represent a unique cohort in the context of both healthcare and genetic risk. Genetic counselors have long recognized and documented the challenges of working with young people and their families compared with working with older adults. Challenges for health professionals include engagement with the young person, communication, developmentally appropriate psychosocial assessment, and working with the young person and their family. Likewise, young people also report experiencing challenges within the genetic counseling process. In response to these challenges, and increasing numbers of young people presenting for genetic testing, genetic counselors at the Parkville Familial Cancer Centre (Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia) formed a collaboration with the ONTrac at Peter Mac Victorian Adolescent & Young Adult Cancer Service. Consisting of a multidisciplinary expert panel who provide care to young people with cancer and their families, the collaboration identified the need to develop an evidence-based framework to ensure the delivery of youth-friendly care and support for young people and their families facing genetic risk. To guide this work, a working party comprising of experts in genetic counseling, adolescent and young adult (AYA) oncology, adolescent health, clinical ethics, and clinical research was established. A literature review was undertaken and based on expert and consumer input and feedback, a consensus-based framework for youth-friendly genetic counseling was developed over several stages. This paper describes the evidence base supporting the development of this framework, the process of development, and the resulting framework of youth-friendly genetic counseling.

"A change in perspective": Exploring the experiences of adolescents with hereditary tumor predisposition

BACKGROUND

Hereditary tumor predisposition syndromes (HTPSs) are being recognized more frequently in the etiology of pediatric cancer. Previous research indicates that disclosure of tumor susceptibility is a significant event in adolescents' lives. Insight into adolescents' adjustment to knowledge of their syndromes can guide healthcare delivery, particularly genetic counseling. This study explored the experiences of adolescents with hereditary tumor predisposition and their perceptions of living at risk.

METHODS

Seven adolescents, ages 14 to 17, representing six different childhood-onset HTPSs, were purposively sampled and interviewed using a study-specific semistructured interview guide. We explored the disclosure process, support systems, and the perceived benefits and harms of knowledge of hereditary tumor susceptibility. Interview transcripts were analyzed via interpretive description.

RESULTS

Three major themes emerged from the data: (1) The benefits of knowledge outweigh the harms; (2) context surrounding genetic testing must be recognized; and (3) self-concept is influenced but not defined by tumor risk.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that adolescents recognize the challenges associated with awareness of tumor predisposition but may also identify positive aspects in their experiences, reflecting a changed life perspective. Results of this exploratory study suggest strategies that can guide pretest and posttest genetic counseling of adolescents for HTPSs, facilitating the adaptive incorporation of genetic information into an adolescent's self-concept.

Presymptomatic genetic testing for hereditary cancer in young adults: a survey of young adults and parents

Presymptomatic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes should involve a considered choice. This may be particularly challenging when testing is undertaken in early adulthood. With the aim of exploring the psychosocial implications of presymptomatic testing for hereditary cancer in young adults and their parents, a cross-sectional survey was designed. Two questionnaires were developed (one for young adults who had considered presymptomatic testing, one for parents). Questionnaires were completed by 152 (65.2%) young adults and 42 (73.7%) parents. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, inferential testing, and exploratory factor analysis and linear regression analysis. Young adults were told about their potential genetic risk at a mean age of 20 years; in most cases, information was given by a parent, often in an unplanned conversation. Although testing requests were usually made by young adults, the majority of parents felt they had control over the young adult's decision and all felt their children should be tested. Results suggest that some young adults did not understand the implications of the genetic test but complied with parental pressure. Counselling approaches for presymptomatic testing may require modification both for young adults and their parents. Those offering testing need to be aware of the complex pressures that young adults can experience, which can influence their autonomous choices. It is therefore important to emphasise to both parents and young adults that, although testing can bring benefits in terms of surveillance and prevention, young adults have a choice.

Impact of presymptomatic genetic testing on young adults: a systematic review

Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing should involve a considered choice, which is particularly true when testing is undertaken in early adulthood. Young adults are at a key life stage as they may be developing a career, forming partnerships and potentially becoming parents: presymptomatic testing may affect many facets of their future lives. The aim of this integrative systematic review was to assess factors that influence young adults' or adolescents' choices to have a presymptomatic genetic test and the emotional impact of those choices. Peer-reviewed papers published between January 1993 and December 2014 were searched using eight databases. Of 3373 studies identified, 29 were reviewed in full text: 11 met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis was used to identify five major themes: period before testing, experience of genetic counselling, parental involvement in decision-making, impact of test result communication, and living with genetic risk. Many participants grew up with little or no information concerning their genetic risk. The experience of genetic counselling was either reported as an opportunity for discussing problems or associated with feelings of disempowerment. Emotional outcomes of disclosure did not directly correlate with test results: some mutation carriers were relieved to know their status, however, the knowledge they may have passed on the mutation to their children was a common concern. Parents appeared to have exerted pressure on their children during the decision-making process about testing and risk reduction surgery. Health professionals should take into account all these issues to effectively assist young adults in making decisions about presymptomatic genetic testing.

Genetic testing in inherited polyposis syndromes - how and why?

There have been recent advances in genetic testing enabling accurate diagnosis of polyposis syndromes by identifying causative gene mutations, which is essential in the management of individuals with polyposis syndrome and predictive genetic testing of their extended families. There are some similarities in clinical presentation of various polyposis syndromes, which may pose a challenge to diagnosis. In this review, we discuss the clinical presentation of the main polyposis syndromes and the process of genetic testing, including the latest advancement and future of genetic testing. We aim to reiterate the importance of genetic testing in the management of polyposis syndromes, potential pitfalls associated with genetic testing and recommendations for healthcare professionals involved with the care of polyposis patients.

Tricky teens: are they really tricky or do genetic health professionals simply require more training in adolescent health?

Providing health services to young people poses specific challenges as a consequence of their unique developmental stage. In the field of genetics, providing developmentally appropriate care can be further complicated by the familial nature of genetic information. Several fields of medicine have developed specific guidance around how best to work with adolescent patients. No such advice exists in the field of clinical genetics or genetic counseling. It is time for the field of genetics to address this aspect of practice through development of a specific adolescent-friendly model of care. Without such a model, the field risks falling behind other medical specialties and adolescents who visit genetic health professionals are at risk of missing out on best possible care.

Experiences of predictive testing in young people at risk of Huntington's disease, familial cardiomyopathy or hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

While debate has focused on whether testing of minors for late onset genetic disorders should be carried out if there is no medical benefit, less is known about the impact on young people (<25 years) who have had predictive testing often many years before the likely onset of symptoms. We looked at the experiences of young people who had had predictive testing for a range of conditions with variable ages at onset and options for screening and treatment. A consecutive series of 61 young people who had a predictive test aged 15-25 years at the Clinical Genetic Service, Manchester, for HD, HBOC (BrCa 1 or 2) or FCM (Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy or Dilated Cardiomyopathy), were invited to participate. Thirty-six (36/61; 59%) agreed to participate (10 HD, 16 HBOC and 10 FCM) and telephone interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. None of the participants expressed regret at having the test at a young age. Participants saw the value of pretest counselling not in facilitating a decision, but rather as a source of information and support. Differences emerged among the three groups in parent/family involvement in the decision to be tested. Parents in FCM families were a strong influence in favour of testing, in HBOC the decision was autonomous but usually congruent with the views of parents, whereas in HD the decision was autonomous and sometimes went against the opinions of parents/grandparents. Participants from all three groups proposed more tailoring of predictive test counselling to the needs of young people.

Colorectal polyps in childhood

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Colorectal polyps are a common cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in children. This review updates the information on colorectal polyps and summarizes the recent advances in genetics, diagnosis, and treatment of polyps in the large intestine.

RECENT FINDINGS

A review of recent literature regarding colorectal polyps demonstrates an estimated detected prevalence of 6.1% overall and 12.0% among those with lower gastrointestinal bleeding during pediatric colonoscopy. Non-Caucasian races (e.g., black and Hispanic) are at higher risk for colorectal polyps in childhood. Recent data show juvenile polyps may recur in approximately 45% of children with multiple polyps and 17% of children with solitary polyps. A clinical trial showed that celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, significantly reduced the number of colorectal polyps in children with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Ethical challenges related to genetic tests for FAP have been newly examined. The utility of novel endoscopic techniques (e.g., enteroscopy) in Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome to prevent intussusception have been newly described.

SUMMARY

Although colorectal polyps in children are generally benign and easily removed, careful clinical evaluation and ongoing research are needed to identify the small proportion of children at risk for cancer. The current paradigm of using the polyp number at presentation as a primary determinant of subsequent surveillance may be inadequate for many patients.

Parental preferences for CDKN2A/p16 testing of minors

PURPOSE

Genetic testing of minors is controversial, as ethical considerations depend on multiple aspects of the particular disease and familial context. For melanoma, there is a well-established and avoidable environmental influence and a documented benefit of early detection.

METHODS

We surveyed 61 CDKN2A/p16 mutation-tested adults from two kindreds about their attitudes toward genetic testing of minors immediately posttesting and 2 years later.

RESULTS

Overall, 86.9% expressed support of melanoma genetic testing of minors, with the importance of risk awareness (77.4%) and the likelihood of improved prevention and screening behaviors (69.8%) as the most frequently cited potential benefits. Among mutation carriers, 82.6% wanted genetic testing for their own children. These preferences remained stable over a 2-year period. Most respondents (62.3%) favored complete involvement of their children in genetic counseling and test reporting; 19.7% suggested that children be tested but not informed of the results. Concerns about inducing psychological distress or compromising children's decision autonomy were infrequently cited. Testing preferences did not vary by respondent age, gender, or melanoma history.

CONCLUSION

Respondents strongly supported melanoma genetic testing of minors, with most citing improved health behavior as a likely outcome. We discuss options for melanoma genetic counseling and testing of minors.

CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF FAMILIES WITH HEREDITARY COLORECTAL CANCER SYNDROMES

Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes can be associated with a lifetime risk of CRC of >70% in the absence of specialized surveillance. Diagnosing a genetic predisposition to cancer allows clinicians to tailor cancer prevention strategies for patients and families at highest risk. Once a genetic syndrome has been identified in a family, communication with family members, timely implementation of screening tests and/or surgeries, and psychosocial support are all instrumental for effective cancer prevention.Molecular screening of tumors, computerized risk assessment models, and genetic testing can help clinicians identify individuals at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes. This review discusses some of the complexities involved in the diagnosis and management of families with hereditary CRC syndromes and provides strategies for coordinating clinical care.