Clinical variants of myocardial involvement in COVID-19-positive patients: a cumulative experience of 2020

Risk of incident atrial fibrillation after COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) during the post-acute phase of COVID-19 are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the risk of incident AF in COVID-19 recovered patients by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched Medline and Scopus to locate all articles published up to December 1, 2023, reporting the risk of AF in patients recovered from COVID-19 infection compared with noninfected patients in whom the arrhythmia developed during the same follow-up period. AF risk was evaluated by the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model with hazard ratio as the effect measure with 95% confidence interval (CI); heterogeneity was assessed by Higgins I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Overall, 19,478,173 patients (mean age, 56.5 years; 63.0% male) enrolled in 5 observational studies were included in the analysis. Of these, 5,692,510 recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. During a mean follow-up of 14.5 ± 3.2 months, a random effects model revealed a pooled incidence of new-onset AF in 2.6% of cases (95% CI, 1.8%-6.18%). Recovered COVID-19 patients presented with a higher risk of incident AF (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.24-1.99; P < .0001; I2 = 77.9%) compared with noninfected patients during the same follow-up period. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the yielded results. A multivariable metaregression including age, male sex, history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and length of follow-up was able to explain a significant part of the heterogeneity (R2 = 54.3%; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Recovered COVID-19 patients have a higher risk of AF events compared with individuals from the general population.

The long-term cardiovascular impairment of COVID 19: need for clarity in definition and terminology

Clinical experience and several large studies in the field have found that SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause long-term persistent cardiovascular (CV) impairment beyond the acute phase of the disease. This has resulted in a major public health concern worldwide. Regarding COVID-related long-term involvement of various organs and systems, using specific definitions and terminology is crucial to point out time relationships, lingering damage, and outcome, mostly when symptoms and signs of CV disease persist beyond the acute phase. Due to a lack of a common standardized definition, investigators have used interchangeable terms such as "long COVID," "post-COVID," or "post-acute sequelae of COVID-19" to describe CV involvement, thus causing some confusion. For the sake of clarity, the aim of this paper is to discuss the definition and terminology used in defining sequelae after the acute phase of COVID-19, thus pointing out the meaning of definitions like acute cardiac injury, post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, long COVID syndrome, and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Trends in occurrence of takotsubo syndrome and association with SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination

AIMS

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a serious heart disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. TTS has been related to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine; however, the current data are scarce. We aimed to examine the associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection and its vaccine with TTS.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of 3 237 909 adults from the largest healthcare provider in Israel. Patients were followed from 1 March 2020 until 31 December 2021 for the occurrence of TTS. Ten randomly selected controls were matched to each case of TTS on age, sex, and duration of follow-up. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine in the prior 30 days was assessed in cases and controls.

RESULTS

During the follow-up 144 patients developed TTS and were matched to 1440 controls. The mean age of cases and their matched controls was 71.4 ± 12 years, and 136 (94.4%) of them were women. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine were not associated with an increased risk of TTS; odds ratio (OR) = 2.04 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.50-8.2] and 0.87 (0.49-1.54), respectively. The absolute number of TTS cases in the prepandemic period (March-December 2018-2019) was 82 in 2018 and 80 in 2019. The number of TTS cases decreased to 56 during the corresponding period of 2020 (first pandemic year) and increased back to 81 in 2022.

CONCLUSION

No significant association was found between SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination and TTS occurrence.

Fulminant Myocarditis and Cardiogenic Shock Following COVID-19 Infection Versus COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Myocarditis, diagnosed by symptoms and troponin elevation, has been well-described with COVID-19 infection, as well as shortly after COVID-19 vaccination. The literature has characterized the outcomes of myocarditis following COVID-19 infection and vaccination, but clinicopathologic, hemodynamic, and pathologic features following fulminant myocarditis have not been well-characterized. We aimed to compare clinical and pathological features of fulminant myocarditis requiring hemodynamic support with vasopressors/inotropes and mechanical circulatory support (MCS), in these two conditions.

METHODS

We analyzed the literature on fulminant myocarditis and cardiogenic shock associated with COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination and systematically reviewed all cases and case series where individual patient data were presented. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for "COVID", "COVID-19", and "coronavirus" in combination with "vaccine", "fulminant myocarditis", "acute heart failure", and "cardiogenic shock". The Student's t-test was used for continuous variables and the χ2 statistic was used for categorical variables. For non-normal data distributions, the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test was used for statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

We identified 73 cases and 27 cases of fulminant myocarditis associated with COVID-19 infection (COVID-19 FM) and COVID-19 vaccination (COVID-19 vaccine FM), respectively. Fever, shortness of breath, and chest pain were common presentations, but shortness of breath and pulmonary infiltrates were more often present in COVID-19 FM. Tachycardia, hypotension, leukocytosis, and lactic acidosis were seen in both cohorts, but patients with COVID-19 FM were more tachycardic and hypotensive. Histologically, lymphocytic myocarditis dominated both subsets, with some cases of eosinophilic myocarditis in both cohorts. Cellular necrosis was seen in 44.0% and 47.8% of COVID-19 FM and COVID-19 vaccine FM, respectively. Vasopressors and inotropes were used in 69.9% of COVID-19 FM and in 63.0% of the COVID-19 vaccine FM. Cardiac arrest was observed more in COVID-19 FM (p = 0.008). Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support for cardiogenic shock was also used more commonly in the COVID-19 fulminant myocarditis group (p = 0.0293). Reported mortality was similar (27.7%) and 27.8%, respectively) but was likely worse for COVID-19 FM as the outcome was still unknown in 11% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first series to retrospectively assess fulminant myocarditis associated with COVID-19 infection versus COVID-19 vaccination, we found that both conditions had a similarly high mortality rate, while COVID-19 FM had a more malignant course with more symptoms on presentation, more profound hemodynamic decompensation (higher heart rate, lower blood pressure), more cardiac arrests, and higher temporary MCS requirements including VA-ECMO. In terms of pathology, there was no difference in most biopsies/autopsies that demonstrated lymphocytic infiltrates and some eosinophilic or mixed infiltrates. There was no predominance of young males in COVID-19 vaccine FM cases, with male patients representing only 40.9% of the cohort.

An unexpected cause of chest pain, dyspnea and palpitations in a young patient during a post-COVID syndrome

A 31-year-old male presented with sudden onset of chest pain and dyspnea after a COVID-19 infection. Initially labeled as a myopericarditis related to COVID-19, because of the young age and low risk profile, after a multiparametric evaluation was possible to diagnose and treat an unstable lesion on an intermediate branch of left coronary.

The heart and SARS-CoV-2

SARS-Cov2 is currently causing a persistent Covid-19 pandemic, which poses a risk of causing long-term cardiovascular sequels in the population. The viral mechanism of cell infection through the angiotensin 2 converter enzyme receptor and the limited antiviral innate immune response are the suspected causes for a more frequent cardiovascular damage in SARS-Cov2 infection. Knowledge of: the appearance during acute infection of other cardiac conditions beyond the classical myocarditis and pericarditis), the long-term cardiac manifestations (persistent Covid-19), and the increased incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination; it is of special interest in order to offer our patients best practices based on current scientific evidence.

Microbiological and Clinical Findings of SARS-CoV-2 Infection after 2 Years of Pandemic: From Lung to Gut Microbiota

Early recognition and prompt management are crucial for improving survival in COVID-19 patients, and after 2 years of the pandemic, many efforts have been made to obtain an early diagnosis. A key factor is the use of fast microbiological techniques, considering also that COVID-19 patients may show no peculiar signs and symptoms that may differentiate COVID-19 from other infective or non-infective diseases. These techniques were developed to promptly identify SARS-CoV-2 infection and to prevent viral spread and transmission. However, recent data about clinical, radiological and laboratory features of COVID-19 at time of hospitalization could help physicians in early suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection and distinguishing it from other etiologies. The knowledge of clinical features and microbiological techniques will be crucial in the next years when the endemic circulation of SARS-CoV-2 will be probably associated with clusters of infection. In this review we provide a state of the art about new advances in microbiological and clinical findings of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalized patients with a focus on pulmonary and extrapulmonary characteristics, including the role of gut microbiota.

The mechanism underlying extrapulmonary complications of the coronavirus disease 2019 and its therapeutic implication

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly transmissible disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that poses a major threat to global public health. Although COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system, causing severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome in severe cases, it can also result in multiple extrapulmonary complications. The pathogenesis of extrapulmonary damage in patients with COVID-19 is probably multifactorial, involving both the direct effects of SARS-CoV-2 and the indirect mechanisms associated with the host inflammatory response. Recognition of features and pathogenesis of extrapulmonary complications has clinical implications for identifying disease progression and designing therapeutic strategies. This review provides an overview of the extrapulmonary complications of COVID-19 from immunological and pathophysiologic perspectives and focuses on the pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets for the management of COVID-19.