Freeze-all policy: is it time for that?

Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin injection before frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A retrospective cohort study

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in hormone replacement regimen for frozen-thawed embryos. We performed a retrospective cohort study and included patients who underwent frozen embryo transfer (FET) between January 1, 2020 and May 31, 2022. According to the protocols for the FET cycle, the patients were divided into control (n = 238) and hCG groups (n = 216). The clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, early abortion rate, late abortion rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate were compared between the 2 groups. There was a significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate between the hCG and control groups (55.1% vs 45.8%, P = .048). The ectopic pregnancy rate decreased (5.0% vs 6.4%, P = .654), while the live birth rate increased (36.1% vs 29.0%, P = .105) in the hCG group. However, these differences were not statistically significant. The administration of hCG injection in HRT-FET cycles alone was also found to be associated with clinical pregnancy by logistic regressive analysis. HCG injection in the hormone replacement regimen for FET increased the clinical pregnancy rate.

Cumulative live birth rate and neonatal outcomes after early rescue ICSI: a propensity score matching analysis

STUDY QUESTION

Is early rescue ICSI (E-RICSI) an effective and safe technique compared to conventional ICSI?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Despite the higher multi-pronucleus (PN) rate compared to conventional ICSI, E-RICSI did not add extra risks to clinical and neonatal outcomes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Based on the finding that the second polar body was released in 80% of fertilized oocytes by 4 h after exposure to spermatozoa and in ∼90% of fertilized oocytes by 6 h, E-RICSI brings forward the timing of rescue ICSI to 6 h after initial insemination, and effectively prevents oocyte aging and embryo-uterus asynchrony. However, some researchers still voice concerns about the efficacy and safety of E-RICSI, and comparative studies are limited.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent conventional ICSI or E-RICSI treatment between January 2015 and December 2020 at a university-affiliated hospital. Using 1:1 propensity score matching, 1496 cases entered each group.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

In total, 1496 couples undergoing conventional ICSI oocyte retrieval cycles and 1496 undergoing E-RICSI oocyte retrieval cycles were enrolled in this study, and basic clinical characteristics, embryologic data, clinical outcomes and neonatal data were compared between groups. The embryos in the E-RICSI group were divided into two subgroups: those fertilized by iIVF (IVF subgroup) and those fertilized by E-RICSI (E-RICSI subgroup); the embryologic data, clinical outcomes, and neonatal data for these subgroups were also compared with the conventional ICSI group. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis with potential confounder adjustment.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The 2PN rate, blastocyst formation rate, and viable blastocyst formation rate of the E-RICSI group were significantly lower compared to the conventional ICSI group (2PN rate: P < 0.001; blastocyst formation rate: P < 0.001; viable blastocyst formation rate: P = 0.004), and the multi-PN rate in the E-RICSI group was significantly higher than the conventional ICSI group (P < 0.001). However, the number of 2PN embryos, normal cleavage embryo rate, Day 3 high-quality cleavage embryo rate, and high-quality blastocyst rate were similar between groups. When considering the IVF embryos and E-RCSI embryos in the E-RICSI group independently, the 2PN rate of the conventional ICSI group was significantly lower than E-RICSI subgroup but higher than the IVF subgroup, whereas the blastocyst formation rate and viable blastocyst formation rate were higher than E-RICSI embryos but comparable to IVF embryos. As for the clinical and neonatal outcomes, the implantation rate of the E-RICSI subgroup was significantly lower than the IVF subgroup but comparable to the conventional ICSI group, while the low birthweight (LBW) rate was significantly lower compared with the conventional ICSI group but similar with the IVF subgroup. No other differences were observed among the three groups for cumulative clinical pregnancy rate, cumulative live birth rate, and the pregnancy outcomes per transfer including clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth, either in fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles. Furthermore, neonatal outcomes, including cesarean section, sex ratio, LBW, preterm birth, and macrosomia, were similar among groups.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study is limited by the retrospective design, limited sample size, and short follow-up period. However, our study underlies the need for large-scale, multi-center randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Short-term insemination (3 h) combined with E-RICSI may be a safe and effective method to prevent the occurrence of total fertilization failure, and patients with normal or borderline sperm could be encouraged to try IVF first.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This study was supported by grants from the National Key & Development Program of China (No. 2021YFC2700603) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81801443). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Exploring the Impact of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation and Non-Invasive Oocyte Assessment in ART Treatments

Invasive and noninvasive features are normally applied to select developmentally competent oocytes and embryos that can increase the take-home baby rates in assisted reproductive technology. The noninvasive approach mainly applied to determine oocyte and embryo competence has been, since the early days of IVF, the morphological evaluation of the mature cumulus-oocyte complex at the time of pickup, first polar body, zona pellucida thickness, perivitelline space and cytoplasm appearance. Morphological evaluation of oocyte quality is one of the options used to predict successful fertilization, early embryo development, uterine implantation and the capacity of an embryo to generate a healthy pregnancy to term. Thus, this paper aims to provide an analytical revision of the current literature relating to the correlation between ovarian stimulation procedures and oocyte/embryo quality. In detail, several aspects of oocyte quality such as morphological features, oocyte competence and its surrounding environment will be discussed. In addition, the main noninvasive features as well as novel approaches to biomechanical parameters of oocytes that might be correlated with the competence of embryos to produce a healthy pregnancy and live birth will be illustrated.

Duration of late-follicular elevated progesterone and in vitro fertilization outcomes in pituitary down-regulation treatment cycles

Background

The objective of this study was to explore whether the duration of LFEP (late-follicular elevated progesterone) affected pregnancy outcomes in IVF (in vitro fertilization) patients treated with pituitary downregulation protocols.

Method

Patients with their first IVF/ICSI cycles between January 2016 and December 2016 were included. LFEP was set either at P > 1.0ng/ml or P > 1.5ng/ml. Clinical pregnancy rate was compared among three different groups (no LFEP; LFEP for 1 day; LFEP for ≥ 2 days). Then multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the influencing factors of clinical pregnancy rate.

Results

This retrospective analysis involved 3,521 first IVF/ICSI cycles with fresh embryo transfers. Clinical pregnancy rate was the lowest in patients with a LFEP duration of ≥ 2 days, irrespective of whether LFEP was defined as P > 1.0 ng/ml (68.79% vs. 63.02% vs. 56.20%; P = 0.000) or as P > 1.5 ng/ml (67.24% vs. 55.95% vs. 45.51%; P = 0.000). In addition, LFEP duration was significantly associated with clinical pregnancy outcomes in unadjusted logistic regression analysis. However, in multivariate regression models after adjusting confounders, adjusted OR for LFEP duration (≥ 2 days) in the two models was 0.808 (P = 0.064; LFEP as P > 1.0 ng/ml) and 0.720 (P = 0.098; LFEP as P > 1.5 ng/ml), respectively.

Conclusion

LFEP adversely affects clinical pregnancy outcomes. However, the duration of LFEP seems to have no influence on the clinical pregnancy rate in pituitary downregulation treatment cycles.

Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles

Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital for Reproductive Medicine affiliated to Shandong University from August 2017 to June 2021. A total of 1774 women with a history of RIF undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) were included in this study. All the participants were classified into atosiban or control group: Group A included 677 patients who were administered atosiban intravenously 30 min prior to FET with a dose of 37.5 mg; Group B included 1097 patients who received no atosiban before the transfer. There were no significant differences observed in the live birth rate (LBR) (39.73% vs. 39.02%, P = 0.928) between the two groups. Other secondary outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher preterm birth rates in the control group compared with the atosiban group (0 versus 3.0%, P = 0.024) in the natural FET cycles. Atosiban may not improve pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients in FET cycles. However, the effects of Atosiban on pregnancy outcomes should be assessed in clinical trials with larger sample sizes.

Impact of Embryo Cryopreservation on Large for Gestational Age Babies Born by Embryo Transfer: Cohort Retrospective Study

The transfer of frozen-thawed embryos has been associated with an increased risk of large for gestational age at birth. Our objective is to assess its impact on the risk of large for gestational age (LGA) in order to improve the bias control in relation with the available studies. Retrospective cohort study on cumulative sample of 801 single live births of 32 weeks or longer of gestation, resulting from pregnancies obtained by cryopreserved or fresh embryo transfer which are not affected by disorders that could impair fetal growth and carried out at Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, in Madrid, during the period 2005-2017. The relative risk (RR) of LGA has been estimated with its confidence interval (CI) at 95%. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was applied to adjust the crude effect. LGA was more frequent in babies born after cryotransfer in comparison with the reference group (20.9% vs. 6.0%; p < 0.001), as well as macrosomia (8.2% vs. 0.9%; p < 0.001). Frequencies of weight > 4500 g were similar (0.7% vs. 0.1%; p > 0.05). Nulliparity was associated to a higher risk of LGA (RR: 3.8; CI95%: 2.0-7.0; p < 0.005), as well as cleaving embryo transfer (RR: 2; CI95%: 1.07-3.8; p < 0.05). According to the multivariate analysis, the exposure variable was the only one independently associated with LGA (OR: 3.5; CI95%: 2.0-6.1; p < 0.001). Frozen-thawed embryo transfer significantly increases the risk of LGA, regardless of the influence of factors relating to the patient's condition, the embryos transferred, or the fetal sex.

Predicting the probability of a live birth after a freeze-all based in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment strategy

BACKGROUND

The predictors for live birth rate (LBR) following one episode of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle for patients using a "freeze-all" strategy are not entirely clear.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study utilizing a prediction model was developed to assess the relationship to the LBR. Women undergoing IVF with a freeze-all strategy were screened. Univariate models were first fitted for female age at oocytes retrieval/frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), body mass index (BMI), duration and etiology of infertility, previous IVF failures, total dose and duration of gonadotrophin, ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), number of oocytes collected, method of fertilization, number of embryos created, number and stage of embryos frozen, type and number of FET cycles, endometrial thickness (EMT)/pattern, hormone level on transplantation day, storage duration, number of embryos thawed and damaged thawed embryos, number and stage of embryos transferred and number of different quality embryos transferred. Variables with P<0.05 in the univariate model were selected for further analysis of the final multivariate discrete-time logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 7,602 women undergoing one ovarian stimulation resulted in 9,964 FETs, of whom 3,066 (40.33%) had a live-birth after their first FET and 3,929 (51.68%) after total FETs. The EMT and woman's age at oocyte retrieval were the most important predictors. In the first FET, the LBR of women with an EMT ≤8 mm [27.40%; 95% confidence interval (CI): (21.60-33.81%)] was significantly lower than that of women with EMT between 9 and 11 mm [36.51%; 95% CI: (34.25-38.81%)] and thicker than 12 mm [44.23%; 95% CI: (42.22-46.25%)] (P<0.05). The optimistic and conservative cumulative LBRs of women younger than 31 years [87.5%; 95% CI: (86.32-88.61%) and 63.04%; 95% CI: (61.36-64.69%)] were significantly decreased in women aged 31-35, 36-40 and >40 (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides an effective prediction model for a woman's chance of having a baby after a "freeze-all" policy. The use of EMT and female age as tools to identify LBR are shown to be justified, and repeated FETs cannot reverse the age-dependent decline in fertility.

Pro: Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer. Is frozen embryo transfer the future?

Embryo cryopreservation has been an integral part of ART for close to 40 years and vitrification has boosted overall ART efficacy and safety. Recently, there has been a vivid scientific discussion on whether elective cryopreservation of all embryos (freeze-all) should be pursued for most patients, with a fresh embryo transfer taking place only in selected cases. In terms of efficacy, the available evidence suggests that the freeze-all strategy leads to higher live birth rates after the first embryo transfer compared to the conventional strategy in high responders, while there is no difference in normal responders. There is no evidence to suggest that the freeze-all strategy is inferior to the conventional strategy of fresh transfer when comparing cumulative live birth rates using data from all available randomized controlled trials. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is significantly reduced in the freeze-all policy. However, regarding obstetric complications and neonatal outcomes, the evidence suggests that each strategy is associated with certain risks and, therefore, there is no approach that could be unequivocally accepted as safer. Similarly, limited evidence does not support the notion that patients would be universally against freeze-all owing to the inevitable delay in pregnancy achievement. Finally, the cost-effectiveness of freeze-all is likely to vary in different settings and there have been studies supporting that this policy can be, under certain conditions, cost-effective. Adoption of the freeze-all policy can also allow for more flexible treatment strategies that have the potential to increase efficacy, reduce cost and make treatment easier for patients and clinics. Importantly, freeze-all does not require the use of any experimental technologies, further training of personnel or the costly acquisition of new equipment. For these reasons, transitioning to the freeze-all policy for most patients appears to be the next logical step in ART.

Wisdom of Freezing All Valuable Embryos

Background: It is controversial whether that “Freeze-only” strategy is superior to Fresh embryo transfer in ART patients with normal ovarian response. There are two reasons supporting a “Freeze-only” strategy. One is that frozen-thawed embryos are transferred to a more physiologically receptive endometrium. While fresh embryos are transferred to a badly affected one because of controlled-ovarian stimulations, which cause the discordant development of the endometrium, when thawed-frozen embryos are transferred in a subsequent cycle the endometrium is not affected by high estrogen levels. The other reason is the big difference in cryopreservation and stimulation techniques.

Methods: We investigated the annual ART reports in Japan from 1992 to 2018, and our clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfers and fresh embryo transfers from 2015 to 2019. This enabled the assessment of the survival rate of frozen blastocyst by Cryotop safety kit after thawing in four different clinics. We compared the outcomes of frozen embryo transfer (FroET) to fresh embryo transfer.

Results: The proportion of birth in Japan in the study interval found that FroET was responsible for 86.7% of births, compared to 13.3% of births resulting from fresh embryo transfers after IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Clinical outcome of FroET in our clinic was significantly higher than that of fresh embryo transfer regardless of maternal age and number of collected oocytes. Average survival rate of frozen blastocyst by Cryotop safety kit after thawing in four clinics was over 95%.

Conclusions: We believe that “Freeze-only high-quality blastocysts” is superior to fresh embryo transfer in terms of clinical outcome, at least when compared to historical results.

Early Spontaneous Abortion in Fresh- and Frozen-Embryo Transfers: An Analysis of Over 35,000 Transfer Cycles

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for early spontaneous abortion (ESA) in fresh- and frozen-embryo transfers.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study comprised a total of 35,076 patients, including 15,557 women in the fresh-embryo transfer group and 19,519 women in the frozen-embryo transfer group from January 2016 to December 2020. The primary outcome of this study was ESA, which we defined as the termination of embryonic development before 12 weeks of pregnancy (i.e., an early abortion after artificial multi-fetal pregnancy reduction was excluded).

RESULTS

In the 35,076 ART transfer cycles, the incidence of ESA was 5.77% (2023/35,076), and the incidence rates for ESA in fresh and frozen cycles were 4.93% (767 of 15,557) and 6.43% (1,256 of 19,519), respectively. Using a multivariate logistic regression analysis model, maternal age, body mass index (BMI), and number of embryos transferred were independent predictors for ESA. In addition, frozen-thawed transfer was a risk factor for ESA as compared with fresh transfer (OR = 1.207; 95% CI, 1.094-1.331; P = 0.000), blastocyst transfer was risk factor for ESA as compared with cleavage transfer (OR =1.373; 95% CI, 1.186-1.591; P = 0.000 in the total group; OR = 1.291; 95% CI, 1.111-1.499; P = 0.001 in the frozen-transfer group), and unexplained infertility was a protective factor for ESA only in the frozen group (OR = 0.746; 95% CI, 0.565-0.984; P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal age, BMI, number of embryos transferred, and frozen-thawed transfer were independent risk factors for ESA in assisted reproductive technology treatment cycles.

Study protocol: a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, 6-month, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of supplementing hormone therapy FET cycles with Gushen'antai pills on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization

Background

Infertility is a widespread global challenge. Currently, the most effective treatment strategy for infertility is in vitro fertilization (IVF), which is an assisted reproductive technique (ART). The use of IVF for assisted pregnancy dates back to the last 41 years when the first IVF baby was born. During IVF, many oocytes are obtained in an IVF cycle, and more than one embryo is formed. Subsequently, frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is increasingly being used in IVF cycles for women in whom a fresh embryo transfer fails to result in a pregnancy, or in those who return for a second baby. However, the pregnancy success rates following FET treatment cycles are reportedly lower than in fresh embryo transfers. Therefore, recent related studies are increasing determining mechanisms of improving the sustained pregnancy rate of FET and reducing the rate of early abortion.

The Gushen’antai pill (GSATP), which contains a mixture of 10 herbs, has been widely used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) as a pharmacological option to prevent miscarriage. However, randomized controlled trials (RCT) have never been conducted to provide high-level clinical evidence on the clinical efficacy of GSATP. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of GSATP of hormone therapy (HT) FET cycles on pregnancy rate.

Methods

A total of 300 subjects aged between 18 and 40 years which prepared for HT cycle FET will be enrolled in the study. The patients were from five different hospitals, with 60 patients from each hospital. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, and medication was started on the day of endometrial transformation. After FET 28 days, B-ultrasound was done to determine whether to continue the medication. Baseline assessments were carried out before the trial and outcomes were collected 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks of each gestational cycle.

Discussion

Differences in ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and threatened abortion rate between the two groups will be statistically analyzed. We can finally have an objective evaluation of the efficacy of the traditional Chinese medicine Gushen’antai pills.

Trial registration

ChiCTR1900026737. Registered October 20, 2019.

Do frozen embryo transfers modify the epigenetic control of imprinted genes and transposable elements in newborns compared with fresh embryo transfers and natural conceptions?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the epigenetic control of imprinted genes (IGs) and transposable elements (TEs) differs at birth between fresh or frozen embryo transfers and natural conceptions.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 202 singleton births were divided into three groups: 84 natural pregnancies (controls), 66 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh embryo transfers, and 52 vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with frozen embryo transfers.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pyrosequencing was used to assess the DNA methylation profiles of three IGs (H19/IGF2:IG-DMR [two sequences], KCNQ1OT1:TSS-DMR, and SNURF:TSS-DMR) and two TEs (LINE-1 and HERV-FRD) in cord blood and placenta. The quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was used to study the transcription of three IGs (H19, KCNQ1, and SNRPN) and two TEs (LINE-1 and ORF2).

RESULT(S)

After adjustment, the placental DNA methylation levels of H19/IGF2 were lower in the fresh embryo transfer group than in the control (H19/IGF2-seq1) and frozen embryo transfer (H19/IGF2-seq2) groups. The DNA methylation rate for LINE-1 was lower in placentas from the fresh embryo transfer group than in placentas from the control and frozen embryo transfer groups and for HERV-FRD compared with controls. In cord blood, DNA methylation levels were not significantly associated with the mode of conception. The relative expression of LINE-1 and ORF2 was decreased in both cord blood and placental tissues from fresh embryo transfer conceptions compared with natural conceptions and frozen embryo transfer conceptions.

CONCLUSION(S)

Compared with natural conceptions and frozen embryo transfers, fresh embryo transfers were associated with methylation and/or transcription changes in some TEs and IGs, mostly in placental samples, which could indicate altered placental epigenetic regulation resulting from ovarian stimulation protocols.

Immediate versus delayed frozen embryo transfer in women following a failed IVF-ET attempt: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal time at which to perform a frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) following a failed in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) attempt remains elusive to most reproductive experts. Physicians often delay the introduction of FET due to concerns related to potential residual effects of ovarian hyperstimulation which may interfere with the regular menstrual cycle. Moreover, given that most of the published studies on the topic are retrospective and have inconsistent findings, it is crucial to develop evidence-based randomized control guides for clinical practice. Therefore, this well-designed randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to determine whether it is necessary to delay FET for at least one menstrual cycle after the failure of fresh embryo transfer.

METHODS

Infertile women eligible for IVF-ET were invited to participate in this multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, parallel-group, unblinded, controlled trial at the academic fertility centers of four public hospitals in Chinese Mainland. Infertile women scheduled to receive their first FET cycle after a failed IVF-ET attempt were randomly assigned to either (a) the immediate FET group in which FET was performed in the first menstrual cycle following the failed IVF-ET cycle (n = 366) or (b) the delayed FET group in which FET was performed in the second or subsequent menstrual cycle following the failed IVF-ET cycle (n = 366). All FET cycles were performed during hormone replacement cycles for endometrial preparation. The primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy, defined as a detectable fetal heart beat beyond twelve weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes were other pregnancy-related outcomes, maternal and neonatal complications. Analysis was performed by both intention-to-treat and per-protocol principles.

RESULTS

A total of 646 FETs were completed. The frequency of moderate to severe depression and high stress level prior to FET in delayed FET group were significantly higher than that in immediate FET group (10.6% vs 6.1%, p = 0.039; 30.3% vs 22.4%, p = 0.022, respectively). Immediate FET resulted in a higher frequency of clinical pregnancy than did delayed FET (41.7% vs 34.1%), for a relative risk (RR) of 1.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.50; p = 0.045). Women who underwent immediate FET also had a lower frequency of biochemical pregnancy loss (11.7% vs. 30.6%), with a RR of 0.28 (95% CI 0.23-0.63, p < 0.001), and a higher frequency of embryo implantation (25.2% vs. 20.2%), with a RR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.01-1.53; p = 0.038). Although the ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates did not differ significantly between the immediate FET and delayed FET groups (37.1% vs 30.3%, RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.99-1.52, p = 0.067; 36.5% vs 30.0%, RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.98-1.52, p = 0.079, respectively), a multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders such as depression and stress levels revealed that the immediate FET group had a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates than the delayed FET group (odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.99, p = 0.041; odds ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, p = 0.031). The risks of maternal and neonatal complications were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with a previous failed IVF-ET attempt, immediate FET resulted in higher ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates than delayed FET. These findings warrant caution in the indiscriminate application of a delayed FET strategy when apparent risk of high stress level is perceived.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2000033313 .

Separating parental and treatment contributions to perinatal health after fresh and frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproduction: A cohort study with within-sibship analysis

BACKGROUND

Compared to naturally conceived children, adverse perinatal outcomes are more common among children born after assisted reproductive technology with fresh embryo transfer (fresh-ET) or frozen embryo transfer (frozen-ET). However, most previous studies could not adequately control for family confounding factors such as subfertility. We compared birth size and duration of pregnancy among infants born after fresh-ET or frozen-ET versus natural conception, using a within-sibship design to account for confounding by maternal factors.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This registry-based cohort study with nationwide data from Denmark (1994-2014), Norway (1988-2015), and Sweden (1988-2015) consisted of 4,510,790 live-born singletons, 4,414,703 from natural conception, 78,095 from fresh-ET, and 17,990 from frozen-ET. We identified 33,056 offspring sibling groups with the same mother, conceived by at least 2 different conception methods. Outcomes were mean birthweight, small and large for gestational age, mean gestational age, preterm (<37 weeks, versus ≥37), and very preterm birth (<32 weeks, versus ≥32). Singletons born after fresh-ET had lower mean birthweight (-51 g, 95% CI -58 to -45, p < 0.001) and increased odds of small for gestational age (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.34, p < 0.001), while those born after frozen-ET had higher mean birthweight (82 g, 95% CI 70 to 94, p < 0.001) and increased odds of large for gestational age (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.17, p < 0.001), compared to naturally conceived siblings. Conventional population analyses gave similar results. Compared to naturally conceived siblings, mean gestational age was lower after fresh-ET (-1.0 days, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.8, p < 0.001), but not after frozen-ET (0.3 days, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.6, p = 0.028). There were increased odds of preterm birth after fresh-ET (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.37, p < 0.001), and in most models after frozen-ET, versus naturally conceived siblings, with somewhat stronger associations in population analyses. For very preterm birth, population analyses showed increased odds for both fresh-ET (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.90 to 2.12, p < 0.001) and frozen-ET (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.94, p < 0.001) compared with natural conception, but results were notably attenuated within siblings (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.41, p = 0.059, and OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.27, p = 0.6, for fresh-ET and frozen-ET, respectively). Sensitivity analyses in full siblings, in siblings born within 3-year interval, by birth order, and restricting to single embryo transfers and blastocyst transfers were consistent with the main analyses. Main limitations were high proportions of missing data on maternal body mass index and smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that infants conceived by fresh-ET had lower birthweight and increased odds of small for gestational age, and those conceived by frozen-ET had higher birthweight and increased odds of large for gestational age. Conception by either fresh-ET or frozen-ET was associated with increased odds of preterm birth. That these findings were observed within siblings, as well as in conventional multivariable population analyses, reduces the likelihood that they are explained by confounding or selection bias.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ISRCTN11780826.

Towards a better understanding of preimplantation genetic screening and cumulative reproductive outcome: transfer strategy, diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness

A decision model was constructed to compare genetic testing and not testing, for the transfer of all suitable embryos, one at a time, from a cycle with up to ten embryos, until a first live birth was achieved or there were no more embryos available (a full cycle). Two strategies were investigated: (i) a fresh transfer with subsequent serial warmed cryopreserved embryo replacement, and (ii) freeze-all prior to serial embryo replacement. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effect of embryo warming survival and diagnostic accuracy on cumulative rates. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for a live birth event, and a clinical miscarriage avoided. Reproductive outcome probabilities were obtained from published prospective non-selection studies, and costs from websites and publications.

Given 100% embryo warming survival and no false abnormal genetic test results, the live birth rate for a full cycle was the same with and without testing for both transfer strategies. Compared to not testing, it was theoretically possible for testing to be favoured for live birth only for the fresh and frozen transfer strategy, where more than one embryo was available, and dependent on the efficiency of warming survival and the positive predictive value of the test; however, this was unlikely to be cost-effective from a society perspective without a substantial reduction in genetic testing costs. For both transfer strategies, when more than one embryo was available, testing was more likely to achieve a live birth event following the first attempt with fewer attempts required overall. Testing was likely to be effective to avoid a clinical miscarriage but also to be expensive from a society perspective compared to the cost of dilation and curettage.

Dydrogesterone versus medroxyprogesterone acetate co-treatment ovarian stimulation for IVF: a matched cohort study of 236 freeze-all-IVF cycles

This matched cohort study was retrospectively performed, with cycles extracted from freeze-all-IVF treatments performed between March and November 2019, to compare the efficacy of flexible-start dydrogesterone (DYG) co-treatment ovarian stimulations (OS) with flexible-start medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) co-treatment OS. DYG cycles were matched 1:1 with MPA cycles using female age and antral follicle count, resulting in 236 matched cycles. OS durations and total FSH doses were similar in DYG and MPA OS cycles. The numbers of mature oocytes retrieved were similar; however, the mature oocyte retrieval rate was significantly lower (66.7 vs. 78.2%; p = .001) and the cycle cancellation rates were higher (29.2 vs. 21.2%; p = .056) in DYG co-treatments. A linear regression selected OS co-treatment protocol (0.53 DYG (0.356-0.776), p = .001) into the final model to predict a ≥ 80% mature oocyte retrieval rate. The per transfer (47.2 vs. 49.7; p = .721) and per treatment ongoing pregnancy rates (32.2 vs. 38.1%, p = .210) were similar in the two co-treatment groups. Flexible-start DYG co-treatment OS was as effective in blastocyst freeze-all-IVF cycles as MPA co-treatment, with similar ongoing pregnancy rates; however, mature oocyte retrieval was significantly decreased and cycle cancellation increased in DYG cycles.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Progestin (i.e. artificial progesterone) co-treatment has long been known to be a feasible alternative to conventional GnRH-analogue co-treatment in OS for IVF, because of the long-standing evidence that progestin formulations have in oral contraceptive therapies. The recent evolution of effective freeze-all-IVF (in which high mid-cycle progesterone levels is not of concern because of the postponement of embryo transfer) has now made it possible to investigate progestin co-treatment OS in IVF.What do the results of this study add? Ongoing pregnancy rates from blastocyst frozen embryo transfers in flexible-start dydrogesterone (DYG) co-treatment ovarian stimulation (OS) cycles were similar to rates in flexible-start medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) co-treatment OS cycles. The mature oocyte retrieval rate was significantly lower and the cycle cancellation rate higher in DYG than in MPA cycles.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The evidence suggests that MPA co-treatment should be preferred in OS for IVF. Further investigation is required to refine progestin co-treatment protocols, because of their potential to reduce the number of viable blastocysts.

Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer

Background

Along with progress in embryo cryopreservation, especially the vitrification, freeze all strategy has become more acceptable than ever. Some studies have found comparable or higher live birth rate with frozen embryo transfer (FET) than with fresh embryo transfer(ET)in gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol. However from our literature research, there have been no reports about live birth rate comparison between fresh ET and FET with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol. The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate whether patients benefit from freeze all strategy in GnRH-a protocol using real-world data.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study, in which women undergoing fresh ET or FET with GnRH-a long protocol at Chongqing Reproductive and Genetics Institute from January 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated. The primary outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy loss and ectopic pregnancy rate.

Results

A total of 7,814 patients met inclusion criteria, implementing 5,216 fresh ET cycles and 2,598 FET cycles, respectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients were significantly different between fresh ET and FET groups, except BMI. After controlling for a broad range of potential confounders including age, infertility duration, BMI, AMH, number of oocytes retrieved and of available embryos, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss rate between two groups (all P > 0.05). However, the implantation rate and live birth rate in fresh ET group were significantly higher than FET group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively).

Conclusions

Under GnRH-a long protocol, compared to FET, fresh ET was associated with higher implantation rate and live birth rate in infertile patients that underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). The freeze all strategy should be individualized and made with caution especially with GnRH-a long protocol.

Luteal Support with very Low Daily Dose of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin after Fresh Embryo Transfer as an Alternative to Cycle Segmentation for High Responders Patients Undergoing Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist-Triggered IVF

The segmentation of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, consisting of the freezing of all embryos and the postponement of embryo transfer (ET), has become popular in recent years, with the main purpose of preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients with high response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Indeed cycle segmentation (CS), especially when coupled to a GnRH-agonist trigger, was shown to reduce the incidence of OHSS in high-risk patients. However, CS increases the economic costs and the work amount for IVF laboratories. An alternative strategy is to perform a fresh ET in association with intensive luteal phase pharmacological support, able to overcome the negative effects of the GnRH-agonist trigger on the luteal phase and on endometrial receptivity. In order to compare these two strategies, we performed a retrospective, real-life cohort study including 240 non-polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCO) women with expected high responsiveness to COS (AMH >2.5 ng/mL), who received either fresh ET plus 100 IU daily human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as luteal support (FRESH group, n = 133), or cycle segmentation with freezing of all embryos and postponed ET (CS group, n = 107). The primary outcomes were: implantation rate (IR), live birth rate (LBR) after the first ET, and incidence of OHSS. Overall, significantly higher IR and LBR were observed in the CS group than in the FRESH group (42.9% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.05 and 32.7% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.05, respectively); the superiority of CS strategy was particularly evident when 16-19 oocytes were retrieved (LBR 42.2% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.01). Mild OHSS appeared with the same incidence in the two groups, whereas moderate and severe OHSS forms were observed only in the FRESH group (1.5% and 0.8%, respectively). In conclusion, in non-PCO women, high responders submitted to COS with the GnRH-antagonist protocol and GnRH-agonist trigger, CS strategy was associated with higher IR and LBR than the strategy including fresh ET followed by luteal phase support with a low daily hCG dose. CS appears to be advisable, especially when >15 oocytes are retrieved.

Cost-effectiveness of freeze-all policy - A retrospective study based upon the outcome of cumulative live births

OBJECT

We have previously reported that cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) are higher in the freeze-all group compared with controls (64.3% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.001). Here, we aim to determine if the freeze-all policy is more cost-effective than fresh embryo transfer followed by frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis consisted of 704 ART (Assisted reproductive technology) cycles, which included in IVF (In vitro fertilisation) and ICSI (Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection) cycles performed in Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan between January 2012 and June 2014. The freeze-all group involved 84 patients and the fresh Group 625 patients. Patients were followed up until all embryos obtained from a single controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation cycle were used up, or a live birth had been achieved. The total cost related to treatment of each patient was recorded. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was based on the incremental cost per couple and the incremental live birth rate of the freeze-all strategy compared with the fresh ET strategy. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) were performed.

RESULTS

The total treatment cost per patient was significantly higher for the freeze-all group than in the fresh group (USD 3419.93 ± 638.13 vs. $2920.59 ± 711.08 p < 0.001). However, the total treatment cost per live birth in the freeze-all group was US $5319.89, vs. US $6382.42 in the fresh group. CEAC show that the freeze-all policy was a cost-effective treatment at a threshold of US $2703.57 for one additional live birth. Considering the Willingness-to-pay threshold per live birth, the probability was 60.1% at the threshold of US $2896.5, with the freeze-all group being more cost-effective than the fresh-ET group; or 90.1% at the threshold of $4183.8.

CONCLUSION

The freeze-all policy is a cost-effective treatment, as long as the additional cost of US $2703.57 per additional live birth is financially acceptable for the subjects.

Should the modified natural cycle protocol for frozen embryo transfer be modified? A prospective case series proof of concept study

OBJECTIVE

Modified natural cycles for frozen embryo transfer utilize an ovulation trigger which assists in embryo transfer scheduling and simplifies cycle monitoring. There have been conflicting results with this protocol and modifications may be sought. We wanted to ascertain whether a modified natural protocol for frozen embryo transfer without triggered ovulation but with luteal progesterone support disconnecting the timing of embryo transfer from the timing of the LH surge can achieve a high pregnancy rate.

STUDY DESIGN

Candidates for frozen embryo transfer of 48-h cleavage cell embryos were recruited from May 2016 to April 2018. The patients were monitored for endometrial growth, follicle formation and estradiol, progesterone, and LH hormone levels. After meeting the predetermined criteria, embryo transfer was scheduled. The patients began progesterone treatment 48 h before embryo transfer, regardless of identification of the LH surge if ovulation had not commenced. The predetermined primary outcome was the biochemical pregnancy rate while the secondary outcome included the clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate. Patients were monitored to the eighth week of pregnancy, but data was collected from the medical records to provide the live birth rate as well.

RESULTS

Fifty-six women were screened. Eleven women declined or did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three had anovulatory cycles and were excluded. Forty-two women were included in the statistical analysis. The implantation rate was 42.9 % [95 %CI 29.3 %-56.4 %). Of the 42 participants, 25 (59.5 %) conceived [95 % CI 44.0 %-75 %]. Two pregnancies ended in first trimester miscarriage leaving 23 (54.7 %) ongoing pregnancies [95 % CI 39.1 %-70.5 %]. One patient experienced a late abortion such that the live birth rate was 22 of 42 patients or 52.4 % [95 % CI 36.4 %-68.0 %].

CONCLUSION

The proposed modified natural protocol which utilizes progesterone luteal support but does not trigger ovulation, maintains a high pregnancy rate while providing flexibility regarding the day of transfer disconnected from the day of the LH surge. This was a prospective, proof of concept study. This protocol may be suitable for smaller or public in-vitro fertility units whose resources are limited and facilities are not available daily. The high pregnancy and live birth rate that we found provides confidence that this protocol can be part of the armament of protocols the clinician may offer to his patients. Larger studies should confirm these findings.

A Comparison of the Efficacy of Immediate Versus Delayed Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on the Ongoing Pregnancy Rate After a Failed IVF Attempt: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Non-Inferiority, Parallel-Group, Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

In clinical practice, the ideal time at which to perform a Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer (FET) after a failed In-vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer (IVF-ET) is still unclear to most practicing physicians. In addition, physicians often delay the introduction of FET due to concerns on the possible residual effects of ovarian hyperstimulation, which may interfere with the regular menstrual cycle. Moreover, given that most of the published studies on the topic are retrospective with contradictory findings, it is crucial to provide evidence-based randomized control guides for clinical practice.

METHODS/ANALYSIS

The study is a randomized, non-inferiority, parallel-group, controlled trial that will enroll a total of 732 women undergoing their first FET after a failed fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycle. The participants will then be randomized into two groups based on a computer-generated randomized list. The two groups include: (i) an immediate group were FET will be carried out during the first menstrual cycle after a failed fresh ET cycle and (ii) a delayed group where FET will be carried out during the second menstrual cycle after a failed fresh ET cycle. Primary outcomes will be defined as viable pregnancies with fetal heartbeats, diagnosed through pelvic ultrasonography after twelve weeks of gestation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Assisted Reproductive Medicine at the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (SDTCM/E-2020.2.01). In addition, written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants before the study. The results of this trial will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.

DISCUSSION

Currently, there is no consensus with regard to the duration after which the effects of ovarian stimulation are observed after a failed fresh ET and the optimal time required to begin FET. Moreover, no randomized controlled trial exists that compares the ongoing pregnancy rates after immediate versus delayed FET following a failed fresh ET cycle. Therefore, it is important to conduct a well-designed randomized trial to determine whether it is necessary to delay FET for at least one menstrual cycle after the failure of fresh ET.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2000033313 (http://www.chictr.org.cn/enIndex.aspx).

Comparison of Frozen Embryo Transfer Outcomes Between Uterine Infusion of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Growth Hormone Application in Patients With Thin Endometrium: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of two treatments on the outcome of freeze-thaw embryo transfer for pregnancy assistance in thin endometrium.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 66 patients who failed in the first cycle treated in the reproductive medicine center of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2018 to December 2019. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used through cavity infusion in one group (n=25, and growth hormone (GH) was subcutaneously injected in the group (n=41). The clinical data of the two groups were compared, including morphology and thickness of the endometrium, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate in each period of the hormone replacement cycle.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, BMI, AMH, FSH, LH, E₂, infertility years, number of transferred embryos, basal endometrium, and thickness of endometrium on the day of P administration before and after treatment (P> 0.05). After treatment, compared to the GH group, the G-CSF group presented higher biochemical pregnancy rate (56% versus 48.8%; P=0.569), clinical pregnancy rate (52% versus 46.3%; P=0.655), implantation rate (34.8% versus 27.5%; P=0.391), and live birth rate (40% versus 31.7%; P=0.493), but the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). On the 5th day of treatment, the endometrial thickness in the G-CSF group was thinner than that in the GH group (4.83 ± 0.85 versus 5.75 ± 1.27; P< 0.05), but it had no correlation with pregnancy outcome (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in endometrial thickness between the two groups on the 7th, 9th day of treatment and the day of P administration (P > 0.05). On the 5th day of treatment, the proportion of endometrial type A morphology in the GH group was significantly higher than that in the G-CSF group (P < 0.05), while the type B morphology in the G-CSF group was significantly higher than that in the GH group (P< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although G-CSF and GH may not have a role in increasing endometrium, both of them can improve the pregnancy outcomes of patients with thin endometrium in the FET cycle. And the effects of the two treatments were similar.

Cardiovascular problems associated with IVF therapy

We are now in the beginning of the fifth decade of in vitro fertilization (IVF) with more than ten million children born and an annual growth rate of half a million. It was recently found that there is a sevenfold increase in the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) during the first trimester of an IVF pregnancy as compared to spontaneous pregnancy. PE is a major cause of maternal mortality, and it is thus of outmost importance to understand the pathophysiological mechanism. The oestrogen surge during the ovarian stimulation has been hypothesized to be the initiating pathophysiological event. A support of this is a current report showing that embryo transfer performed directly after ovarian stimulation increased the risk of PE more than eightfold, whereas no such increase was noted after delayed embryo transfer. This increased risk coincides with a persisting increased oestrogen level. Further reported cardiovascular problems are arterial thromboses, pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension. Global haemostasis tests change in the direction of increased coagulability, but mostly within normal limits. Cell-bound haemostasis and in particular platelet activation are less studied. However, a major increase in the number of microvesicles (MVs) and markers indicating platelet activation was reported during ovarian stimulation. We now need longitudinal data concerning haemostatic variables that extends into the first trimester. A major research focus should be to identify biomarkers that could be used already before instigation of IVF. Another way to avoid risk could be to delay embryo transfer by adapting a freeze-all strategy.

Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in women with thin endometrium: a retrospective cohort study

Background

A thin endometrium affects embryo implantation. We designed a retrospective cohort study to analyze the differences of in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) outcomes between fresh embryo transfer (ET) and frozen ET in patients with a thin endometrium.

Methods

The present study comprised of 1,110 patients with a thin endometrium undergoing IVF-ICSI between January 2013 and December 2017 in our unit. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the influence of intergroup confounding factors and to compare the pregnancy outcomes of the matched patients in the two groups. The fresh embryo group and frozen embryo group consisted of 632 and 478 women, respectively. After PSM, 173 patients were included in the two groups, respectively.

Results

The frozen embryo group showed a higher live birth rate (31% vs. 18.4%, P<0.001; 30.6% vs. 19.7%, P=0.019), clinical pregnancy rate (40% vs. 26.4%, P<0.001; 38.7% vs. 25.4%, P=0.008), and biochemical pregnancy rate (46.2% vs. 32.9%, P<0.001; 44.5% vs. 31.8%, P=0.020) than the fresh embryo group before and after PSM.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that for women with a thin endometrium who were undergoing IVF, the live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and biochemical pregnancy rate after frozen ET were significantly higher than in the fresh ET group.

Perinatal and obstetric outcomes in singleton pregnancies following fresh versus cryopreserved blastocyst transfer: a meta-analysis

The transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts is increasing in IVF centres. However, little is known about the perinatal and obstetric outcomes of this procedure. In an attempt to further elucidate these issues, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare cryopreserved transfer with fresh blastocyst embryo transfer. The results show that the risk of both preterm (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.99, P = 0.04) and low birthweight births (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, P = 0.04) was significantly lower after cryopreserved blastocyst transfer than after fresh blastocyst transfer. The rate of large for gestational age births was significantly higher (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.55-1.82, P < 0.00001) and the rate of small for gestational age births significantly lower (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, P < 0.00001) after cryopreserved blastocyst transfer. The transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts was associated with a significantly lower risk of placental abruption (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.83, P = 0.003) but a significantly higher risk of Caesarean section (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.43, P = 0.03). In conclusion, the perinatal and obstetric outcomes associated with the transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts differ from those associated with fresh blastocyst transfer.

Should we still perform fresh embryo transfers in ART?

An increasing number of researchers have alluded to the potential benefit of deferring the transfer of embryos produced during assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) away from ovarian stimulation, using cryopreservation to enable this. The scientific evidence that may justify this recent trend in the use of the so-called 'freeze-all strategy' includes early, mostly small randomised controlled trials that have demonstrated an increase in live birth rates after elective embryo cryopreservation in certain patient populations, as well as evidence from cohort studies and retrospective analyses. What are the risks and benefits of freeze-all strategies in ART, who are the patients in whom it is likely to be advantageous, and does the current evidence allow us to identify situations when deciding that a fresh embryo transfer would be counter-productive? ART professionals are often faced with challenging clinical decisions regarding the best course of treatment for their patient. The purpose of this opinion paper is to provide a clinical guide for whether to perform a fresh embryo transfer or to opt for freezing all embryos in specific situations.

A freeze-all strategy does not increase live birth rates in women of advanced reproductive age

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a freeze-all strategy improve live birth rates in women of different age groups?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of 1882 first embryo transfer cycles, performed between January 2013 and December 2015. Reproductive outcomes between fresh (FRESH) or frozen (FROZEN) embryo transfers were compared in patients stratified by age: < 35, between 35 and 38, or > 38 years. Student's t test for independent samples and χ² analyses were used as needed. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed adjusting for age, triggering drug, number of retrieved oocytes, number of transferred embryos, and percentage of top-quality embryos.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Live birth rates (LBR) were significantly higher for FROZEN in the < 35 years group (43.7% vs 24%; p < 0.001). In both the 35-38 and > 38 years groups, LBR for FROZEN vs FRESH were not statistically different (30.9% in the FROZEN group vs 29.3% in the FRESH group, p = 0.70, and 19.8% in the FROZEN group vs 12.7% in the FRESH group, p = 0.07, respectively). The multivariate analysis found a significantly positive effect of performing FROZEN on LBR in the younger group (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.31-4.62; p = 0.005) but had no impact in women between 35 and 38 years (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.55-1.83; p = 0.98) or older (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.43-2.13; p = 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing a freeze-all strategy seems to result in better reproductive outcomes when compared with a fresh ET in women under 35 years, with no significant impact on older women.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate used in ovarian stimulation is associated with reduced mature oocyte retrieval and blastocyst development: a matched cohort study of 825 freeze-all IVF cycles

PURPOSE

To compare the effectivity of flexible-start medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) co-treatment ovarian stimulations (OS) with flexible-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) co-treatment OS, in blastocyst freeze-all IVF cycles.

METHOD

This matched cohort study was performed at a single IVF center. Study cycles were extracted from freeze-all IVF cycles performed between February 2015 and June 2018 with cycles grouped according to the co-treatment protocol (MPA and GnRH-ant groups) used. MPA cycles were matched 1:1 using antral follicle count, female age, infertility duration, and female body mass index, with GnRH-ant cycles, resulting in 825 matched cycles. MPA or CET co-treatment was started when leading follicles reached 11-12 mm.

RESULTS

Duration of OS was significantly longer, and total FSH dose was significantly higher in the MPA group. Numbers of mature oocytes retrieved were similar; however, the mature oocyte retrieval rate (83.8 vs. 97.1%; p < 0.001), number of blastocysts, blastocyst rate (36.4 vs. 41.4%; p < 0.001) and > 2 viable blastocyst rate were all significantly lower in the MPA group. The live birth (LB) per transfer rates (51.6 vs. 55.7%; p = 0.155) were similar; however, the LB rate per treatment was significantly lower (40.9 vs. 45.8%; p = 0.05). A linear regression included the OS co-treatment protocol (GnRH-ant; 1.4 (1.07-1.81); p = 0.013) in the final model to predict having > 2 viable blastocysts.

CONCLUSION

Flexible-start MPA co-treatment OS was as effective in freeze-all IVF cycles as GnRH-ant co-treatment, with similar LB per transfer rates; however, increased cycle cancellation and reduced blastocyst numbers reduced LB per treatment rates significantly.

Patients' attitudes and preferences towards a freeze-all strategy in ART treatment

STUDY QUESTION

What are the attitudes towards different aspects of a freeze-all strategy and elective frozen embryo transfer (eFET) in comparison with fresh embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology treatment among female and male patients before and after their first ART treatment cycle in a public health care setting?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Despite concerns about the delay in embryo transfer associated with eFET, nearly 60% of the participants were in favor of eFET compared with fresh embryo transfer assuming that the clinical pregnancy rate was equivalent.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Vitrification and blastocyst transfer have considerably improved success rates after FET with ongoing pregnancy rates in frozen cycles approaching those seen in fresh treatment cycles. Furthermore, the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is essentially eliminated in FET cycles, and FET may be beneficial to the endometrial and fetal development because a hormonal environment mirroring the natural cycle is enabled. However, the freeze-all strategy is not yet implemented as standard care. One reason is the presumption of negative patient attitudes towards a freeze-all embryo strategy. So far, no data regarding patients' attitudes on a freeze-all strategy have been published.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study was designed as a descriptive cross-sectional study including 165 fertility patients referred for their first ART treatment from December 2014 to June 2016.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All newly referred patients participating in a mandatory meeting before initiating ART treatment at the Fertility Clinic, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark were requested to fill in an online web-based questionnaire separately for men and women covering attitudes towards a freeze-all strategy, socio-demographic data and reproductive history. The patients were informed about both conventional fresh embryo transfer strategy and the freeze-all strategy prior to answering the questionnaire.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The total response rate was 77.1% (n = 165), and for women and men respectively 85.8 versus 66.0%. The female respondents were significantly more likely to consider the postponement of embryo transfer difficult compared to the male population (78.6 versus 35.5%; P < 0.001) and they were significantly more willing to accept a risk in treatment on own health to achieve a pregnancy than were the male respondents on their partners health (82.5 versus 96.8%; P = 0.025). However, 59.2% of the women and 59.7% of the men agreed that they would choose eFET over fresh embryo transfer if the chance of pregnancy were the same. Most of the patients furthermore agreed that the health of the mother and their baby was of highest importance. In the adjusted analyses we found no significant predictive factors for preferences towards a freeze-all strategy apart from a negative attitude towards delay of transfer in case of previous unsuccessful ART attempts.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Selection bias cannot be excluded, as the total response rate was 77.1%. The hypothetical nature of the items may furthermore limit the validity of the results. In addition, the participants were from a single Fertility Clinic in the Capital Region of Denmark and may therefore not be representative for all fertility patients.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

In a clinical setting with similar pregnancy rates for eFET and fresh embryo transfer, these results indicate that patients, when given access to information on advantages and disadvantages of both fresh embryo transfer and eFET, are less prone to opt for fresh embryo transfer. This may be ground breaking for a patient-centered paradigm shift in routine ART treatment with a wider implementation of a freeze-all and eFET-strategy eliminating the risk of OHSS.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The Danish Council for Independent Research and Merck Serono supported the study. The study is part of the Reprounion Collaborative study, co-financed by the European Union, Interreg V ÖKS. No competing interests exist.

Controlled ovarian stimulation and progesterone supplementation affect vaginal and endometrial microbiota in IVF cycles: a pilot study

Purpose

Does controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and progesterone (P) luteal supplementation modify the vaginal and endometrial microbiota of women undergoing in vitro fertilization?

Methods

Fifteen women underwent microbiota analysis at two time points: during a mock transfer performed in the luteal phase of the cycle preceding COS, and at the time of fresh embryo transfer (ET). A vaginal swab and the distal extremity of the ET catheter tip were analyzed using next-generation 16SrRNA gene sequencing. Heterogeneity of the bacterial microbiota was assessed according to both the Bray-Curtis similarity index and the Shannon diversity index.

Results

Lactobacillus was the most prevalent genus in the vaginal samples, although its relative proportion was reduced by COS plus P supplementation (71.5 ± 40.6% vs. 61.1 ± 44.2%). In the vagina, an increase in pathogenic species was observed, involving Prevotella (3.5 ± 8.9% vs. 12.0 ± 19.4%), and Escherichia coli-Shigella spp. (1.4 ± 5.6% vs. 2.0 ± 7.8%). In the endometrium, the proportion of Lactobacilli slightly decreased (27.4 ± 34.5% vs. 25.0 ± 29.9%); differently, both Prevotella and Atopobium increased (3.4 ± 9.5% vs. 4.7 ± 7.4% and 0.7 ± 1.5% vs. 5.8 ± 12.0%). In both sites, biodiversity was greater after COS (p < 0.05), particularly in the endometrial microbiota, as confirmed by Bray-Curtis analysis of the phylogenetic distance among bacteria genera. Bray-Curtis analysis confirmed significant differences also for the paired endometrium-vagina samples at each time point.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that COS and P supplementation significantly change the composition of vaginal and endometrial microbiota. The greater instability could affect both endometrial receptivity and placentation. If our findings are confirmed, they may provide a further reason to encourage the freeze-all strategy.

Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis

STUDY QUESTION

Does the outcome of the comparison of live birth rates between the first frozen embryo transfer (ET) (in a freeze-only cycles strategy, i.e. frozen ET group) and a fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET group) differ considering the type of ovarian response?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Α significantly higher probability of live birth is present in high, but not normal, responders, after the first frozen ET in a freeze-only cycle strategy as compared to a fresh ET.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

It has been hypothesised that freezing all good embryos in a fresh in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle and deferring embryo transfer in subsequent cycles may provide a more physiological endometrial environment for embryo implantation when compared to a fresh ET. However, currently, three relevant meta-analyses have been published with conflicting results, while none of them has taken into consideration the type of ovarian response. Recently, the publication of additional, large relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with different types of ovarian response makes possible the comparative evaluation of the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) versus fresh ET, considering the type of ovarian response.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to identify RCTs comparing the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) to a fresh ET. The main outcome was live birth, while secondary outcomes included ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and miscarriage.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We identified eight eligible RCTs, including 5265 patients, which evaluated the first frozen ET in a freeze-only cycle strategy versus a fresh ET either in high responders (n = 4) or in normal responders (n = 4). No relevant RCTs were present in poor responders. Meta-analysis of weighted data using fixed and random effects model was performed. Results are reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Eligible RCTs were published between 2011 and 2018. Four RCTs (n = 3255 patients) compared the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) to a fresh ET in normal responders and four RCTs (n = 2010 patients) did the comparison in high responders. In high responders, a significantly higher probability of live birth was observed in the frozen ET group when compared with the fresh ET group (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06-1.31; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; three studies; n = 3398 patients). However the probability of live birth was not significantly different between the frozen ET group and the fresh ET group in normal responders (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.90-1.41; random effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 77%; three studies; n = 1608 patients). The risk of moderate/severe OHSS was significantly lower in the frozen ET group when compared with the fresh ET group both in high (RR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.37; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: not applicable; a single study; n = 1508 patients) and normal responders (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.80; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; two studies; n = 2939 patients).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Considerable heterogeneity was present among the studies, regarding ovarian stimulation protocols and the triggering signal used for inducing final oocyte maturation as well as the cryopreservation methods, while the quality of evidence was poor for the live birth rate in high responders. Moreover, the analysis did not apply a standard for determining 'high' or 'normal' responders since the type of ovarian response followed the characterisation of populations as reported by the authors of the eligible studies.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

A freeze-only cycle strategy should be the preferred option in high responders since it enhances the probability of live birth, while reducing the chance of moderate/severe OHSS. In normal responders, the same strategy could be applied, in the interest of patient safety or clinic convenience, without compromising the chances of live birth.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funding was used and there were no competing interests.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018099389.

Placental pathology in live births conceived with in vitro fertilization after fresh and frozen embryo transfer

BACKGROUND

The availability and use of frozen embryos after ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction has increased with improvement in vitrification techniques and the rise of preimplantation genetic testing. However, there are conflicting data regarding whether obstetric outcomes differ between fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles.

OBJECTIVE

To compare placental pathology from live births arising from fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 1140 live births with placental pathology arising from autologous in vitro fertilization cycles with fresh or frozen programmed transfer performed at MGH Fertility Center between 2004 and 2017 was retrospectively reviewed. An experienced placental pathologist categorized the reported placental pathology as anatomic, infectious, inflammatory, or vascular/thrombotic. Our primary outcomes were differences in these placental pathologies between the 2 groups. Patient demographic, cycle, and birth outcomes were compared with the use of χ² tests, Student t test, or nonparametric tests, as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare placental pathology between the fresh and frozen transfer groups.

RESULTS

Of the 1140 cycles included in our analysis, 929 arose from fresh embryo transfers (81.3%) and 211 arose from programmed frozen embryo transfers (18.5%). For both transfer types, the average age of the women at time of treatment was 35 years; mean body mass indices were within the normal range (23.6 kg/m² for fresh transfers and 23.2 kg/m² for frozen transfers, P = .26), and mean day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone values were 7.1 and 7.0 IU/L (P = .44), respectively. Deliveries occurred on average at 37.5 and 38.0 weeks' gestational age (P = .04) in the fresh versus frozen transfer group, with similar rates of obstetric complications. However, frozen transfers were more likely to be associated with marginal cord insertion (adjusted odds ratio, 1.87; confidence interval, 1.21, 2.91; P = .01), accessory lobe formation (adjusted odds ratio, 2.96; confidence interval, 1.12, 7.79; P = 0.03), subchorionic thrombi (adjusted odds ratio, 3.72; confidence interval, 1.80, 7.71; P < .001), and fetal vascular malperfusion characteristics with cord anomalies (adjusted odds ratio, 2.34; confidence interval, 1.22, 4.46; P = .01). These trends persisted when we analyzed day 5 transfers alone, and single frozen embryo transfers remained associated with increased rates of subchorionic thrombi compared to single fresh embryo transfers.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancies arising from frozen embryo transfers demonstrated more anatomic and vascular placental pathology than those from fresh transfers in our cohort of patients, despite similar maternal outcomes. More research is needed to explore how these differences in pathology may influence obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

The impact of hyaluronan-enriched culture medium and intrauterine infusion of human chorionic gonadotropin on clinical outcomes in blastocyst transfer cycles

Over the last few decades, advances in ovarian hormonal stimulation, embryology laboratory technologies and embryo genetic testing, have significantly enhanced clinical outcomes in human assisted reproduction technologies (ART). However, embryo implantation remains a major bottleneck in achieving better pregnancy and live birth rates. Thus, there is growing interest in establishing new approaches to enhance implantation efficiency after embryo transfer. With advanced molecular techniques, many promising biomarkers associated with embryonic and endometrial changes occurring prior to and during embryo implantation have been identified. However, despite the progress in applying novel procedures into IVF practice, clinical evaluation of those biomarkers has so far reached modest predictive value for enhancing blastocyst developmental potential and endometrial receptivity. Therefore, other simpler strategies have also been introduced to increase the rates of successful clinical pregnancies and live births. One of these approaches is to investigate the impact of using embryo transfer medium containing high concentrations of an adherence compound, such as hyaluronic acid (HA), on IVF outcomes. Additionally, intrauterine infusion of a small volume of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at the time of embryo transfer (ET) has also been proposed as a technique that might be advantageous for increasing the clinical outcomes, considering the fact that hCG plays a critical role in synchronizing endometrial and fetal development. However, the current findings from both interventions remain controversial, demonstrating a mixture of positive and indifferent results of these treatments in ART cycles. Further research will be crucial for a better understanding of the molecular mechanism of cross-talk between the blastocyst and the maternal endometrium during the optimal implantation period when using either hyaluronan-enriched medium or hCG infusion before embryo transfers. Therefore, this review aims to present existing literature related to both treatments, emphasizing their effects on blastocyst implantation.Abbreviations: ART: assisted reproduction technologies; HA: hyaluronic acid; hCG: human chorionic gonadotrophin; IVF: in vitro Fertilization; ET: embryo transfer; pH: hydrogen ions; CO2: Carbone dioxide; O2: Oxygen; PGT: pre-implantation genetic testing; FET: frozen embryo transfer; PCOS: Polycystic ovarian syndrome; DNA: deoxyribonucleic acid; miRNA: micro-ribonucleic acid; EVs: extracellular vesicles; ERA: endometrial receptivity array; CD44 and RHAMM: primary hyaluronan surface receptors; RCT: randomized clinical trials; LBR: life birth rate; CPR: clinical pregnancy rate; IR: implantation rate.

Factors associated with extremely high progesterone concentrations on the day of HCG administration

OBJECTIVE

Progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration remains one of the most controversial topics in reproductive endocrinology. Factors associated with these increases have not been fully determined. The purpose of our study is to investigate factors associated with extreme progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational, single-center cohort study recruited 2000 fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI)-embryo transfer cycles from January 2000 to December 2014 in our institution.

RESULTS

When cycles were divided into those with progesterone <1.94 ng/mL (n = 1791) and ≧1.94 ng/mL (n = 209) on the day of hCG administration, five factors were positively associated with highly elevated progesterone concentration: protocol (GnRH agonist versus antagonist; odds ratio [OR = 2.786]), number of dominant follicles (OR = 1.098), total dose of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) used (OR = 1.023), elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) (OR = 1.085) and estradiol (E2; OR = 1.001) concentrations on the day of hCG administration (p < 0.001 each). After omitting the protocol effect, the remaining factors showed limited contributions to highly elevated progesterone (ORs = 0.95-1.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The factor showing the greatest association with extreme progesterone elevation was use of the GnRH agonist protocol.

Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved following the "freeze-all" strategy

BACKGROUND

In recent years, some studies have shown that there is a positive association between the number of oocytes retrieved and the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) after fresh and frozen cycles of one oocyte retrieval. However, almost no studies have examined the association between the number of oocytes retrieved and the CLBR when using the "freeze-all" strategy. We performed this study to investigate the effects of an extreme oocyte yield during the first "freeze-all" cycle on the cumulative live birth rate among patients younger than 35 years old.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study performed in a university-affiliated reproductive medicine centre. Data obtained from 3276 women aged younger than 35 years who underwent their first "freeze-all" cycle (IVF/ICSI) were collected between January 2009 and December 2016. In all, 5025 frozen cycles took place during the follow-up period from January 2009 to December 2018. Patients were divided into five groups according to oocytes retrieved (group 1: 4-10 oocytes; group 2: 11-20 oocytes; group 3: 21-30 oocytes; group 4: 31-40 oocytes; group 5: > 40 oocytes). The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate.

RESULTS

Unadjusted results showed that the cumulative live birth rate significantly increased as the number of oocytes retrieved increased and reached up to 93.82% in cases with yields of 21-30 oocytes (P < 0.05), after which it did not have a significant increase (P > 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, our results showed that the number of oocytes retrieved is an independent positive predictor of cumulative live birth rate when using a "freeze-all" strategy. (P < 0.001). In addition, the fertilization rate and the gonadotropin dose also influenced the cumulative live birth rate (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among women younger than 35 years old who underwent the "freeze-all" strategy, the number of oocytes retrieved positively correlated with the cumulative live birth rate. Taking both efficacy and safety into account, ovarian stimulation should be rational, and the upper limit of the oocyte yield should be no more than 30.

Delayed frozen embryo transfer failed to improve live birth rate and neonatal outcomes in patients requiring whole embryo freezing

BACKGROUND

Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) has a negative effect on the endometrial receptivity compared with natural menstrual cycle. Whether it's necessary to postpone the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) following a freeze-all strategy in order to avoid any residual effect on endometrial receptivity consequent to COS was inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to explore whether the delayed FET improve the live birth rate and neonatal outcomes stratified by COS protocols after a freeze-all strategy.

METHODS

A total of 4404 patients who underwent the first FET cycle were enrolled in this study between April 2014 to December 2017, and were divided into immediate (within the first menstrual cycle following withdrawal bleeding) or delayed FET (waiting for at least one menstrual cycle and the transferred embryos were cryopreserved for less than 6 months). Furthermore, each group was further divided into two subgroups according to COS protocols, and the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were analyzed between the immediate and delayed FET following the same COS protocol.

RESULTS

When FET cycles following the same COS protocol, there was no significant difference regarding the rates of live birth, implantation, clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, early miscarriage, premature birth and stillbirth between immediate and delayed FET groups. Similarly, no significant differences were found for the mean gestational age, the mean birth weight, and rates of low birth weight and very low birth weight between the immediate and delayed FET groups. The sex ratio (male/female) and the congenital anomalies rate also did not differ significantly between the two FET groups stratified by COS protocols.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of COS protocols, FET could be performed immediately after a freeze-all strategy for delaying FET failed to improve reproductive and neonatal outcomes.

Clinical utility of freeze-all approach in ART treatment: A mini-review

A significant proportion of couples at reproductive age rely on assisted reproductive technology to overcome infertility. In vitro fertilisation (IVF) involves typically the use of exogenous gonadotropins to stimulate the ovary to produce oocytes, which are collected surgically. After fertilization by conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), embryos are cultured in the embryology laboratory for a few days before being replaced into the uterus (fresh embryo transfer). Spare embryos can be vitrified and stored in liquid nitrogen to be transferred in a subsequent cycle. Over the years, concerns have arisen about possible adverse outcomes of transferring embryos back to the uterus immediately after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) as regards to obstetrical and perinatal outcomes. It has been suggested that high hormonal levels during COS could create a relatively hostile environment for embryo implantation whilst increasing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). With the remarkable improvement of vitrification as an alternative to the slow-freezing technique for human embryos, a new strategy the so-called "freeze-all" (FA) or "elective frozen embryo transfer" (eFET) was introduced. This approach involves COS, followed by the elective cryopreservation of the entire cohort of viable embryos to be transferred to the uterus in subsequent cycles in a possibly more physiological environment, thus avoiding the supra-physiologic hormonal levels observed during COS. The initial reports suggested that this policy could lead to improved pregnancy rates and reduced perinatal complications, which resulted in a steady increase and widespread use of FA globally. However, as data accumulated, it became clear that the use of FA to unselected couples undergoing ART offered no additional benefits over the conventional approach. Nonetheless, current evidence based on randomized controlled trials and observational studies indicates that FA might be justified in selected clinical scenarios, such as those involving the risk of OHSS. By contrast, there is a lack of evidence to support the FA policy for other indications, such as implantation failure or high progesterone levels on the trigger day. This review summarizes the clinical effectiveness of FA with the main focus on the health of offspring.

Live birth rates and perinatal outcomes when all embryos are frozen compared with conventional fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a cohort study of 337,148 in vitro fertilisation cycles

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether segmentation of an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle, with freezing of all embryos prior to transfer, increases the chance of a live birth after all embryos are transferred.

METHODS

In a prospective study of UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data, we investigated the impact of segmentation, compared with initial fresh embryo followed by frozen embryo transfers, on live birth rate and perinatal outcomes. We used generalised linear models to assess the effect of segmentation in the whole cohort, with additional analyses within women who had experienced both segmentation and non-segmentation. We compared rates of live birth, low birthweight (LBW < 2.5 kg), preterm birth (< 37 weeks), macrosomia (> 4 kg), small for gestational age (SGA < 10th centile), and large for gestational age (LGA > 90th centile) for a given ovarian stimulation cycle accounting for all embryo transfers.

RESULTS

We assessed 202,968 women undergoing 337,148 ovarian stimulation cycles and 399,896 embryo transfer procedures. Live birth rates were similar in unadjusted analyses for segmented and non-segmented cycles (rate ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08) but lower in segmented cycles when adjusted for age, cycle number, cause of infertility, and ovarian response (rate ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.78-0.83). Segmented cycles were associated with increased risk of macrosomia (adjusted risk ratio 1.72, 95% CI 1.55-1.92) and LGA (1.51, 1.38-1.66) but lower risk of LBW (0.71, 0.65-0.78) and SGA (0.64, 0.56-0.72). With adjustment for blastocyst/cleavage-stage embryo transfer in those with data on this (329,621 cycles), results were not notably changed. Similar results were observed comparing segmented to non-segmented within 3261 women who had both and when analyses were repeated excluding multiple embryo cycles and multiple pregnancies. When analyses were restricted to women with a single embryo transfer, the transfer of a frozen-thawed embryo in a segmented cycles was no longer associated with a lower risk of LBW (0.97, 0.71-1.33) or SGA (0.84, 0.61-1.15), but the risk of macrosomia (1.74, 1.39-2.20) and LGA (1.49, 1.20-1.86) persisted. When the analyses for perinatal outcomes were further restricted to solely frozen embryo transfers, there was no strong statistical evidence for associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Widespread application of segmentation and freezing of all embryos to unselected patient populations may be associated with lower cumulative live birth rates and should be restricted to those with a clinical indication.

Life-threatening complications among women with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a potentially life-threatening clinical condition.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for life-threatening complications for patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in a United States nationwide sample.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome admissions from 2002 to 2011 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were included in this study. The association between patient and hospital factors and life-threatening complications (deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute renal failure, intubation), nonroutine discharge (discharge to skilled nursing facility, transfer hospital), prolonged length of stay, and total hospital charges were analyzed. Survey-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for these outcomes, controlling for risk factors, with adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals as the measures of effect.

RESULTS

A total of 11,562 patients were hospitalized with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome from 2002 to 2011. The majority were white (55.7%), with private insurance (87.7%), aged 25-39 years (84.6%), and hospitalized in an urban location (95%). In all, 19.3% of patients had medical comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, obesity, hypothyroidism, and anemia. Life-threatening complications occurred in 4.4% of patients (deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, 2.2%; acute renal failure; acute respiratory distress syndrome, 0.9%; intubation, 0.5%). Patients ≥40 years old (odds ratio, 4.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.37, 11.76), those with comorbidities (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.46, 3.57), and African American patients (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.25, 3.70) were more likely to develop life-threatening conditions. Patients with medical comorbidities (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.24, 0.63) were also less likely to be routinely discharged from the hospital. Adjusting for patient and hospital demographics, patients with comorbidities were more likely to develop deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (adjusted odds ratio, 2.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.28, 4.65) and acute renal failure (adjusted odds ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.21, 4.23). Patients who developed life-threatening complications had longer hospital length of stay (adjusted odds ratio, 3.72; 95% confidence interval, 2.28, 6.07) and higher hospital costs (adjusted odds ratio, 5.20; 95% confidence interval, 3.22,8.39).

CONCLUSION

Patients with common medical comorbidities are at higher risk for life-threatening complications in the setting of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Furthermore, these complications are associated with high hospital costs and hospital burden. Given the increasing number of in vitro fertilization patients with medical comorbidities, closer monitoring of at-risk patients may be indicated. As assisted reproductive technology practice changes in recent years with strategies designed to reduce ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome risk, future studies are needed to assess the impact of these changes on hospitalization and complication risk.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of freeze-only or fresh embryo transfer in IVF of non-PCOS women

STUDY QUESTION

Is a freeze-only strategy more cost-effective from a patient perspective than fresh embryo transfer (ET) after one completed In Vitro Fertilization/ Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (IVF/ICSI) cycle in women without polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

There is a low probability of the freeze-only strategy being cost-effective over the fresh ET strategy for non-PCOS women undergoing IVF/ICSI.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Conventionally, IVF embryos are transferred in the same cycle in which oocytes are collected, while any remaining embryos are frozen and stored. We recently evaluated the effectiveness of a freeze-only strategy compared with a fresh ET strategy in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). There was no difference in live birth rate between the two strategies.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed alongside the RCT to compare a freeze-only strategy with a fresh ET strategy in non-PCOS women undergoing IVF/ICSI. The effectiveness measure for the CEA was the live birth rate. Data on the IVF procedure, pregnancy outcomes and complications were collected from chart review; additional information was obtained using patient questionnaires, by telephone.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

For all patients, we measured the direct medical costs relating to treatment (cryopreservation, pregnancy follow-up, delivery), direct non-medical costs (travel, accommodation) and indirect costs (income lost). The direct cost data were calculated from resources obtained from patient records and prices were applied based on a micro-costing approach. Indirect costs were calculated based on responses to the questionnaire. Patients were followed until all embryos obtained from a single controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle were used or a live birth was achieved. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was based on the incremental cost per couple and the incremental live birth rate of the freeze-only strategy compared with the fresh ET strategy. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) were also performed.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Between June 2015 and April 2016, 782 couples were randomized to a freeze-only (n = 391) or a fresh ET strategy (n = 391). Baseline characteristics including mean age, Body Mass Index (BMI), anti-Mullerian hormone, total dose of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), number of oocytes obtained, good quality Day 3 embryos, fertility outcomes and treatment complications were comparable between the two groups. The live birth rate (48.6% vs. 47.3%, respectively; risk ratio, 1.03; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.89, 1.19; P = 0.78) and the average cost per couple (3906 vs. 3512 EUR, respectively; absolute difference 393.6, 95% CI, -76.2, 863.5; P = 0.1) were similar in the freeze-only group versus fresh ET. Corresponding costs per live birth were 8037 EUR versus 7425 EUR in the freeze-only versus fresh ET group, respectively. The incremental cost for the freeze-only strategy compared with fresh ET was 30 997 EUR per 1% additional live birth rate. The direct non-medical costs and indirect costs of infertility treatment strategies represented ~45-52% of the total cost. PSA shows that the 95% CI of ICERs was -263 901 to 286 681 EUR. Out of 1000 simulations, 44% resulted in negative ICERs, including 13.0% of simulations in which the freeze-only strategy was dominant (more effective and less costly than fresh ET), and 31% of simulations in which the fresh embryo strategy was dominant. In the other 560 simulations with positive ICERs, the 95% CI of ICERs ranged from 2155 to 471 578 EUR. The CEAC shows that at a willingness to pay threshold of 300 000 EUR, the probability of the freeze-only strategy being cost-effective over the fresh ET strategy would be 58%.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Data were collected from a single private IVF center study in Vietnam where there is no public or insurance funding of IVF. Unit costs obtained might not be representative of other settings. Data obtained from secondary sources (medical records, financial and activity reports) could lack authenticity, and recall bias may have influenced questionnaire responses on which direct costs were based.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

In non-PCOS women undergoing IVF/ICSI, the results suggested that the freeze-only strategy was not cost-effective compared with fresh ET from a patient perspective. These findings indicate that other factors could be more important in deciding whether to use a freeze-only versus fresh ET strategy in this patient group.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by My Duc Hospital; no external funding was received. Ben Willem J. Mol is supported by an NHMRC Practioner Fellowship (GNT 1082548) and reports consultancy for Merck, ObsEva and Guerbet. Robert J. Norman has shares in an IVF company and has received support from Merck and Ferring. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Cumulative live birth rates following a 'freeze-all' strategy: a population-based study

STUDY QUESTION

What is the cumulative live birth rate following a 'freeze-all' strategy compared with a 'fresh-transfer' strategy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The 'freeze-all' strategy resulted in a similar cumulative live birth rate as the 'fresh-transfer' strategy among high responders (>15 oocytes retrieved) but did not benefit normal (10-15 oocytes) and suboptimal responders (<10 oocytes).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Frozen-thawed embryo transfer is associated with a decreased risk of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared with fresh embryo transfer. It is unclear whether the 'freeze-all' strategy should be offered to all women undergoing ART treatment.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

A population-based retrospective cohort study using data collected by the Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority. This study included 14 331 women undergoing their first stimulated ART cycle with at least one oocyte fertilised between 1 July 2009 and 30 June 2014 in Victoria, Australia. Demographic characteristics, type of ART procedures and resulting pregnancy and birth outcomes were recorded for the stimulated cycle and associated thaw cycles until 30 June 2016, or until a live birth was achieved, or until all embryos from the stimulated cycle had been used.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Women were grouped by whether they had undergone the 'freeze-all' strategy (n = 1028) where all embryos were cryopreserved for future transfer, or the 'fresh-transfer' strategy (n = 13 303) where selected embryo(s) were transferred in the stimulated cycle, and remaining embryo(s) were cryopreserved for future use. A discrete-time survival model was used to evaluate the cumulative live birth rate following 'freeze-all' and 'fresh-transfer' strategy.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 1028 women undergoing 'freeze-all' strategy and 13 303 women undergoing 'fresh-transfer' strategy had 1788 and 22 334 embryo transfer cycles resulting in 452 and 5126 live births, respectively. Most women (61.3%) in the 'freeze-all' group had more than 15 oocytes retrieved in the stimulated cycle compared with 18.1% of women in the 'fresh-transfer' group (P < 0.001). For high responders (>15 oocytes), the cumulative live birth rate in the 'freeze-all' group was similar to the 'fresh-transfer' group (56.8% vs. 56.2%, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.77-1.04). However, the likelihood of a live birth was lower in the 'freeze-all' group compared with the 'fresh-transfer' group among normal responders (10-15 oocytes) (33.2% vs. 46.3%, AHR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83) and suboptimal responders (<10 oocytes) (14.6% vs. 28.0%, AHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.14-1.01). During the minimum follow-up time of 2 years, 34.1%, 24.4% and 8.4% of suboptimal, normal and high responders, respectively, in the 'freeze-all' group did not return for any embryo transfer after the stimulated cycle, whereas all women in the 'fresh-transfer' group had at least one embryo transferred in the stimulated cycle.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

A limitation of this population-based study is the lack of information available on clinic-specific protocols for the 'freeze-all' strategy and the potential impact of these on outcomes. Data were not available on whether the 'freeze-all' strategy was used to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study presents population-based evidence on clinical efficacy associated with a 'freeze-all' and 'fresh-transfer' strategy. The 'freeze-all' strategy may benefit some subgroups of patients, including women who are high responders and those who are at risk of OHSS, but should not be offered universally. Clinicians should consider the potential impact of electively deferring embryo transfer on treatment discontinuation in choosing the optimal embryo transfer strategy for couples undergoing ART treatment.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

No specific funding was received to undertake this study. There is no conflict of interest, except that M.B. is a shareholder in Genea Ltd.

Cumulative live birth rate in freeze-all cycles is comparable to that of a conventional embryo transfer policy at the cleavage stage but superior at the blastocyst stage

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the freeze-all policy ensures a higher efficacy in terms of cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in comparison with a conventional fresh/frozen embryo transfer (ET) approach in patients with normal ovarian response.

DESIGN

Retrospective, matched, multicenter cohort study.

SETTING

Private IVF centers.

PATIENT(S)

This study analyzed 564 completed IVF cycles in which an average of 12-18 oocytes were retrieved. In 435 cycles the conventional strategy was applied, with initial ET followed by frozen embryo replacements, whereas in 129 cycles the freeze-all policy was performed, with elective cryopreservation and deferred use of all viable embryos.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary endpoint was CLBR. The secondary endpoint was cumulative clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULT(S)

Overall, statistically comparable CLBRs were achieved in the fresh/frozen and freeze-all groups (45.5% vs. 53.5%). Stratification of data for age and number of retrieved oocytes confirmed the absence of differences between the two groups. In a subanalysis in which the day of ET and cryopreservation were taken into account, a similar outcome was achieved in cleavage-stage groups (45.6% vs. 46.4%), whereas when ET was performed at the blastocyst stage the CLBR was significantly higher in the freeze-all group (45.3% vs. 66.7%).

CONCLUSION(S)

Our CLBR analysis indicates that clinical performance of the freeze-all policy is equivalent to that of the conventional strategy when ET is carried out at the cleavage stage. However, it seems to be superior if associated with cryopreservation and transfer at the blastocyst stage.

The endometrium during and after ovarian hyperstimulation and the role of segmentation of infertility treatment

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is a crucial part of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) that resulted in a substantial increase in pregnancy rates from in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, in spite of the apparent benefit of COH on an increase in the number of follicles and the number of oocytes retrieved, allowing for extended embryo culture and enabling the selection of the best quality embryo for transfer, several reports has shown that the supraphysiologic hormonal levels may indeed have a detrimental effect at the endometrial level. The current article revises the pathophysiological mechanisms through which ovarian stimulation may negatively affect endometrial receptivity. Also, the evidence is analyzed explaining how segmentation of IVF treatment may allow us to overcome the deleterious effects of hyperstimulation on endometrial receptivity. Deferred embryo transfer may be performed in a more physiologic uterine environment in a subsequent cycle, improve endometrial receptivity, decrease uterine contractility, diminishes the impact of premature luteinization and allow individualized stimulation according to the level of response.

Live birth rate and neonatal outcome following cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus blastocyst transfer using the freeze-all strategy

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the live birth rates and neonatal outcomes following cleavage-stage embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer in a freeze-all treatment scenario?

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study. All good-quality embryos were frozen on the third day; the remaining embryos were grown on until they reached blastocyst stage and then frozen. Between 2007 and 2016, 11,801 patients underwent cleavage-stage embryo transfer and 1009 patients underwent blastocyst transfer in the first treatment cycle using the freeze-all strategy. The live birth rate and neonatal outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The live birth rate in the first frozen embryo transfer cycle was higher following blastocyst transfer than following cleavage-stage transfer (69.1% versus 55.5%, P < 0.01), but there was no difference in live birth rate in the second frozen embryo transfer cycle between blastocyst transfer and cleavage-stage transfer (45.2% versus 52.7%, P > 0.05). Similarly, no difference was found in the cumulative live birth rate for the first complete IVF cycle (71.1% versus 69.2%, P > 0.05). Blastocyst transfer gave a higher risk of preterm singleton delivery than did cleavage-stage transfer. However, there was no difference in the risk of early preterm delivery, low birth weight, very low birth weight, high birth weight and very high birth weight between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support the superiority of blastocyst transfer compared with cleavage-stage transfer in a freeze-all treatment scenario. There may be a higher risk of preterm singleton delivery following blastocyst transfer than following cleavage-stage transfer but further studies are needed to verify this.

Endometrium cytokine profiles are altered following ovarian stimulation but almost not in subsequent hormone replacement cycles

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of ovarian stimulation and hormone replacement treatment on key regulatory cytokines in endometrial secretion during endometrium implantation window.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients undergoing ovarian stimulation (OS) with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist and frozen embryo transfer with hormone replacement treatment (HRT) were recruited. Endometrial secretion aspiration was performed repeatedly during implantation window in natural, OS and HRT cycles of every patient. The concentrations of 17 mediators, known to be involved in human embryo implantation, were assessed by multiplex immunoassay.

RESULTS

Compared with natural cycle (NC), the concentration of IFN-γ, G-CSF and IL-8 within endometrium were almost the same following OS and HRT. Furthermore, increased MCP-1 levels were observed following HRT and OS. In addition, an increase in IL-1b, IL-7, IL-17, IL-6, TNF-a, IL-12, IL-4, IL-13, IL-10, IL-5, VEGF and MIP-1b concentrations were found in OS cycle only. The level of GM-CSF was lower in HRT cycle and higher in OS cycle, when compared with NC. Among all 17 cytokines, no correlation was found between cytokine concentrations and serum estradiol and progesterone, while only IL-7 concentration has a low correlation with serum LH level.

CONCLUSION

Compared to natural and hormone replacement cycle, patients' endometrium cytokine profiles present an increased inflammatory response following ovarian stimulation.

Lipidomic profile as a noninvasive tool to predict endometrial receptivity

For the present study we asked whether the endometrial fluid lipidomic may be a useful approach to predict endometrial receptivity in freeze-all cycles. For this case-control study, endometrial fluid samples were collected from 41 patients undergoing freeze-all cycles. Samples were split depending on the pregnancy outcome: positive group (n = 24) and negative group (n = 17). Data were acquired by the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were applied. A list of potential biomarker ion ratios was obtained and the values were used to build a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to predict pregnancy success. The lipid categories were attributed by LIPID MAPS database. Ion ratios were established according to their correlations and used for the analysis. The PCA showed a tendency of separation between the studied groups, whereas the PLS-DA was able to clearly distinguish them. Fifteen ratios (13 hyper-represented in the negative and two hyper-represented in the positive group) were selected according to their importance for model prediction. These ratios were used to build the ROC curve, which presented an area under curve of 84.0% (95%CI: 69.2-97.4%; p = 0.009). These findings suggest that lipidomic profiling of endometrial fluid may be a valuable tool for identifying the time interval comprising the window of implantation.