Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients: a systematic review

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with recurrent ventricular tachycardias: from catheter ablation and stereotactic radiotherapy to heart transplant-a case report

Background

Management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is often challenging, depending on clinical manifestation. This case report illustrates the complex treatment of HOCM with associated recurrent ventricular arrhythmias.

Case summary

A 54-year-old female with HOCM diagnosed in 2012 underwent a failed attempt for alcohol septal ablation, implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and repeated radiofrequency ablations (including ablation of the septal bulge to reduce LV obstruction). For ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrences, she had stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation with subsequent epicardial cryoablation from mini-thoracotomy, and endocardial ablation with pulsed field energy. The situation was finally solved by mechanical support and heart transplantation.

Discussion

A few important lessons can be learned from the case. First, radiofrequency ablation was used successfully to decrease left outflow tract obstruction. Second, stereotactic radiotherapy has been used after four previous endo/epicardial catheter ablations to decrease the recurrences of VT. Third, mini-thoracotomy was used after previous epicardial ablation with subsequent adhesions to modify the epicardial substrate with cryoenergy. Fourth, pulsed field ablation of atrial fibrillation resulted in an excellent therapeutic effect. Fifth, pulsed field ablation was also used to modify the substrate for VT, and was complicated by transient AV block with haemodynamic deterioration requiring mechanical support. Finally, a heart transplant was the ultimate solution in the management of recurrent VT.

Evolving Contemporary Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with clinical and subclinical episodes occurring in nearly one-half of patients. AF in HCM historically has been characterized as a decisive disease complication associated with substantial risk for thromboembolic stroke and increased morbidity and mortality. However, there have been many advances in treatment strategy resulting in improved outcomes for this patient group. For example, stroke risk in HCM has been greatly reduced by using systemic oral anticoagulation initiated after the first clinical (symptomatic) AF episode, usually with preference given to direct anticoagulants over warfarin. In contrast, stroke risk scoring systems (such as CHA2DS2-VASc score) are not informative in HCM given the substantial potential for stroke events in patients with low scores, and therefore should not be used for anticoagulation decisions in this disease. A novel risk score specifically designed for HCM (HCM-AF score) can reliably identify most patients with HCM at risk for future AF. Although a strategy focused on controlling ventricular rate is effective in asymptomatic (or minimally symptomatic) patients with AF, restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm is required for most patients with marked AF symptom burden and impaired quality of life. Several antiarrhythmic drugs such as sotalol, disopyramide, and amiodarone, can be effective in suppressing AF episodes; albeit safe, long-term efficacy is supported by only limited data. Catheter AF ablation has emerged as an important treatment option for some patients, although freedom from AF after a single ablation is relatively low (35% at 3 years), multiple ablations and the concomitant use of antiarrhythmic drugs can control AF with more than two-thirds of patients maintaining sinus rhythm at 5 years. Surgical AF ablation with biatrial Cox-Maze IV performed as an adjunctive procedure during myectomy can reduce symptomatic AF episodes (70% of patients free from AF at 5 years). For the vast majority of patients who have HCM with AF, the implementation of contemporary therapies has allowed for improved quality of life and low HCM-related mortality.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A proportional meta-analysis and systematic review of single-arm studies

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Limited data exists about the efficacy and clinical outcomes of AF ablation in HCM.

Objective

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the role of catheter-based ablation for treatment of AF in patients with HCM.

Methods

PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies discussing outcomes of catheter-based ablation for AF in patients with HCM. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted relevant data. Incidence rate estimates from individual studies underwent logit transformation to calculate the weighted summary proportion under the random effect model.

Results

A total of 19 reports met the inclusion criteria (1183 patients). The single ablation procedure was successful in 39% patients. Up to 34% patients underwent a repeat ablation. About 41% patients in normal sinus rhythm after successful AF ablation received postprocedure antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. Patients undergoing successful AF ablation experienced a significant improvement in the New York Heart Association functional class (standardized mean difference -1.03; 95% confidence interval -1.23 to -0.83; P < .00001).

Conclusion

AF ablation appears to be safe and feasible in patients with HCM. Freedom from AF after undergoing successful ablation is associated with significant improvement in heart failure symptoms.

State-of-the-Art Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are two very common clinical entities, which often occur simultaneously, giving a hard time to both patients and cardiologists. Myocyte hypertrophy, myocyte disarray and interstitial fibrosis in the left atrium (LA) predisposes to atrial arrhythmias due to modifications of the substrate that promote re-entry. AF is usually poorly tolerated due to the shortening of the diastolic time with rapid heart rates and the lack of the atrial contribution to the diastolic filling in patients who often have a previous diastolic dysfunction. AF onset frequently results in exercise intolerance and recurrent heart failure admissions and also has prognostic implications. Early maintenance of sinus rhythm appears as a worthy approach in these patients, especially when started early in the course of the disease. However, treatment with antiarrhythmic (AA) agents in HCM patients is less effective than in patients without the disease, and concerns regarding safety frequently limit the long-term adherence. Catheter ablation has limited efficacy in patients with persistent AF but can play an important role in patients with paroxysmal AF, emphasizing the importance of an accurate patient selection. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the pathophysiology of combined HCM and AF and the principal pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments recommended in this complex clinical scenario.

The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.

Atrial fibrillation in patients with inherited cardiomyopathies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) often complicates the course of inherited cardiomyopathies and, in some cases, may be the presenting feature. Each inherited cardiomyopathy has its own peculiar pathogenetic characteristics that can contribute to the development and maintenance of AF. Atrial fibrillation may occur as a consequence of disease-specific defects, non-specific cardiac chamber changes secondary to the primary illness, or a combination thereof. The presence of AF can denote a turning point in the progression of the disease, promoting clinical deterioration and increasing morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the management of AF can be particularly challenging in patients with inherited cardiomyopathies. In this article, we review the current information on the prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatment of AF in three different inherited cardiomyopathies: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy, familial dilated cardiomyopathy, and left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy.

Outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with and without atrial fibrillation: a survival meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent occurrence in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). It is associated with worsening symptoms, cardiovascular events, and mortality. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies reporting on mortality in patient with HCM and AF.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane for studies which reported cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with HCM and AF. Outcome was a composite of cardiac mortality and/or all-cause mortality. Mantel Haenszel odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis for the prespecified outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics.

RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. There were 6,858 patients; 1,314 (19%) had history of AF. During a mean follow up that ranged between 4 and 8 years, 405 (30.8%) patients with AF died as compared to 1,011 (18.2%) patients without AF (OR =2.49, 95% CI: 1.85-3.35, P<0.00001, I²=57%). Results persisted with inclusion of studies only reporting specifically on cardiac mortality (OR =2.80, 95% CI: 1.79-4.39, P<0.00001, I²=56%). Also, the mortality difference persisted after exclusion of deaths secondary to stroke in both groups (2 studies, 1,398 patients, OR =2.57, 95% CI: 1.57-4.20, P=0.0002, I²=31%). In three studies (5,857 patients); the presence of AF was associated with a pooled HR of 1.66 (95% CI: 1.29-2.13, P<0.0001, I²=41%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with HCM who develop AF have higher risk of mortality and cardiac deaths as compared to HCM patients without AF.

Update on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and a guide to the guidelines

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiovascular disorder, affecting 1 in 500 individuals worldwide. Existing epidemiological studies might have underestimated the prevalence of HCM, however, owing to limited inclusion of individuals with early, incomplete phenotypic expression. Clinical manifestations of HCM include diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, ischaemia, atrial fibrillation, abnormal vascular responses and, in 5% of patients, progression to a 'burnt-out' phase characterized by systolic impairment. Disease-related mortality is most often attributable to sudden cardiac death, heart failure, and embolic stroke. The majority of individuals with HCM, however, have normal or near-normal life expectancy, owing in part to contemporary management strategies including family screening, risk stratification, thromboembolic prophylaxis, and implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators. The clinical guidelines for HCM issued by the ACC Foundation/AHA and the ESC facilitate evaluation and management of the disease. In this Review, we aim to assist clinicians in navigating the guidelines by highlighting important updates, current gaps in knowledge, differences in the recommendations, and challenges in implementing them, including aids and pitfalls in clinical and pathological evaluation. We also discuss the advances in genetics, imaging, and molecular research that will underpin future developments in diagnosis and therapy for HCM.