Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study

High-Power Short-Duration Posterior Wall Isolation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using the New TactiFlex™ Ablation Catheter

BACKGROUND

The TactiFlex™ ablation catheter, Sensor Enabled™ (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN, USA), is an open-irrigation radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter with flexible tip technology. This catheter delivers high-power short-duration (HPSD) RF ablations and has been adopted for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. HPSD is well-established not only in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) but also when targeting extra-pulmonary vein (PV) targets. This study aims to determine the safety, effectiveness, and acute outcomes of PVI plus posterior wall isolation (PWI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (Pe-AF) using HPSD and the TactiFlex™ ablation catheter.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent the ablation of Pe-AF in our centre between February 2023 and February 2024 were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent PVI plus PWI using TactiFlex™ and the HPSD strategy. The RF parameters were 50 W on all the PV segments and the roof, and within the posterior wall (PW). Left atrial mapping was performed with the EnSite X mapping system and the high-density multipolar Advisor HD Grid, Sensor Enabled™ mapping catheter. We compared the procedural data using HPSD with TactiFlex™ (n = 52) vs. a historical cohort of patients who underwent PVI plus PWI using HPSD settings and the TactiCath ablation catheter (n = 84).

RESULTS

Fifty-two consecutive patients were included in the study. PVI and PWI were achieved in all patients in the TactiFlex™ group. First-pass PVI was achieved in 97.9% of PVs (n = 195/199). PWI was obtained in all cases by delivering extensive RF lesions within the PW. There were no significant differences compared to the TactiCath group: first-pass PVI was achieved in 96.3% of PVs (n = 319/331). Adenosine administration revealed PV reconnection in 5.7% of patients, and two reconnections of the PW were documented. Procedure and RF time were significantly shorter in the TactiFlex™ group compared to the TactiCath group, 73.1 ± 12.6 vs. 98.5 ± 16.3 min, and 11.3 ± 1.5 vs. 23.5 ± 3.6 min, respectively, p < 0.001. The fluoroscopy time was comparable between both groups. No intraprocedural and periprocedural complications related to the ablation catheter were observed. Patients had an implantable loop recorder before discharge. At the 6-month follow-up, 76.8% of patients remained free from atrial arrhythmia, with no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HPSD PVI plus PWI using the TactiFlex™ ablation catheter is effective and safe. Compared to a control group, the use of TactiFlex™ to perform HPSD PVI plus PWI is associated with a similar effectiveness but with a significantly shorter procedural and RF time.

Very high-power and short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in a Latin American low-volume private center

BACKGROUND

Center volume and operator experience/training are important factors impacting outcomes in AFib CA. Setting for RF delivery (power, duration, and contact force) associated with better outcomes remains to be determined.

METHODS

This is an observational, longitudinal, and retrospective study. All consecutive procedures performed between December 12, 2013, and March 9, 2023, in a low-volume private center in Latin America were analyzed. Procedure characteristics and outcomes were compared between STD and vHPSD.

RESULTS

Two hundred ten procedures were performed on 194 patients. Median annual number of procedures was 19 (7-29). Median age was 62 (52-68), and majority were male (71%). Median procedure duration was 155 (125-195) min, mean fluoroscopy time 32.8 ± 15 min and mean fluoroscopy dose 373.5 ± 208.9 mGray. Median follow-up was 27 months, significantly longer in STD compared with vHPSD group (43 [31-68] vs. 13 [8-19], respectively; P ≤ 0.001). The recurrence rate was 33.2% and major complications 8.6%. Compared with STD, vHPSD resulted in a significantly shorter procedure duration (125 vs. 180 min, P ≤ 0.001), shorter fluoroscopy time (22.7 ± 9.5 vs. 39.2 ± 14.3 min, P ≤ 0.001), and lower fluoroscopy dose (283.8 ± 161.1 vs. 438.3 ± 216.1 mGray, P ≤ 0.001). No long-term recurrence difference was observed when the follow-up periods were comparable. No difference in complication rate was observed (8.5% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.988).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes in AFib CA in a Latin American low-volume private center can be considered acceptable, with efficacy and safety similar to those reported in the literature. Compared with STD ablation, vHPSD showed higher efficiency with similar efficacy and safety.

Durable pulmonary vein isolation with optimized high-power and very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation: A step-by-step guide

INTRODUCTION

Through systematic scientific rigor, the CLOSE guided workflow was developed and has been shown to improve pulmonary vein isolation durability. However, this technique was developed at a time when using power-controlled ablation catheters with conventional power ranges was the norm. There has been increased adoption of a high-power and very high-power short-duration ablation practice propelled by the availability of the temperature-controlled radiofrequency QDOT MICRO catheter.

METHODS

There are fundamental differences in biophysics between very high-powered temperature guided ablation and conventional ablation strategy that may impact patient outcomes. The catheter's design and ablation modes offer flexibility in technique while accommodating the individual operator's clinical discretion and preference to deliver a durable, transmural, and contiguous lesion set.

RESULTS

Here, we provide recommendations for 3 different workflows using the QDOT MICRO catheter in a step-by-step manner for pulmonary vein isolation based on our cumulative experience as early adopters of the technology and the data available in the scientific literature.

CONCLUSIONS

With standardization, temperature-controlled ablation with the QDOT MICRO catheter provides operators the flexibility of implementing different ablation strategies to ensure durable contiguous pulmonary vein isolation depending on patient characteristics.

The effect of high-power short-duration pulmonary vein isolation on PWPT-a predictor of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The P wave peak time (PWPT) is a predictor of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). High-power short-duration ablation has been associated with improved durability of circumferential pulmonary vein electrical isolation (PVI). We investigated the effect of high-power short-duration PVI on PWPT in patients with PAF.

METHODS

Out of 111 patients with PAF, 91 received radiofrequency ablation (ablation group) and 20 received medication treatment (control group). A VIZIGO sheath and an STSF catheter (Biosense Webster, CA, USA) were used together for high-power short-duration circumferential PVI at ablation index values of 500 and 400 for the anterior and posterior walls, respectively. The patients were followed up for 12 months.

RESULTS

The preoperative PWPT in the ablation group was similar to that in the control group: PWPT II = 54.38 ± 6.18 ms vs. 54.35 ± 6.12 ms (p > 0.05), PWPT V1 = 54.19 ± 6.21 ms vs. 54.31 ± 6.08 ms (p > 0.05), respectively. Circumferential PVI was achieved for all patients in the ablation group during the operation. At the 12-month follow-up, there were seven cases of AF recurrence. The PWPT in the ablation group 12 months postoperatively was shorter than the preoperative value: PWPT II = 49.39 ± 7.11 ms vs. 54.38 ± 6.18 ms (p < 0.001), PWPT V1 = 47.69 ± 7.01 ms vs. 54.19 ± 6.21 ms (p < 0.001). The PWPT in the patients with AF recurrence was significantly longer than that in the non-recurrence patients: PWPT II = 50.48 ± 7.12 ms vs. 47.33 ± 6.21 ms (p < 0.001), PWPT V1 = 50.84 ± 7.05 ms vs. 47.19 ± 6.27 ms, (p < 0.001). The PWPT of the control group at the 12-month follow-up was similar to the baseline level: PWPT II = 54.32 ± 6.20 ms vs. 54.35 ± 6.12 ms (p > 0.05), PWPT V1 = 53.89 ± 6.01 ms vs. 54.31 ± 6.08 ms (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that high-power short-duration PVI had a positive effect on PWPT, which is a predictor of PAF.

Comparison of very high-power short-duration, high-power short-duration, and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal power and duration settings for radiofrequency (RF) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to improve efficacy and safety is unclear. We compared low-power long-duration (LPLD), high-power short-duration (HPSD), and very HPSD (vHPSD) RF settings for AF ablation.

METHODS

This network meta-analysis (NMA) was structured according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Observational and randomized studies were included. Eligible studies compared outcomes in AF patients who underwent first-time RF ablation with the following settings: vHPSD (70-90 W, 3-10 s), HPSD (45-60 W, 5-10 s), or LPLD (20-40 W, 20-60 s).

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies comprising 10,375 patients were included (33% female). Frequentist NMA showed LPLD tended toward a lower odds of freedom from arrhythmia (FFA) versus HPSD (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-1.00). There was no difference in FFA between vHPSD versus HPSD. Splitwise interval estimates showed a lower odds of FFA in LPLD versus vHPSD on direct (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.93) and network estimates (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.98). Frequentist NMA showed less total procedural (TP) time with HPSD versus LPLD (generic variance 1.06, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.29) and no difference between HPSD versus vHPSD.

CONCLUSION

This NMA shows improved procedural times in HPSD and vHPSD versus LPLD. Although HPSD tended toward improved odds of FFA compared to LPLD, the overall result was not statistically significant. The odds of FFA in LPLD was lower versus vHPSD on direct and network estimates on splitwise interval analysis. Large prospective head-to-head randomized trials are needed to validate HPSD and vHPSD settings.

Characteristics of right pulmonary vein with an epicardial connection needing additional carina ablation for isolation

Background

This study thought to elucidate the anatomical features that can predict an epicardial connection (EC) between the right pulmonary vein (RPV) and right atrium.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 251 consecutive patients undergoing initial radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. We defined EC as present when RPV could not be isolated with circumferential ablation and additional ablation for the conduction gap if needed, and RPV isolation could be achieved by ablation for the earliest activation site >10 mm inside the initial ablation line. Using computed tomography data, we evaluated the RPV bifurcation angle, and the area occupation ratio of the carina region to the RPV antrum (ARC) for predicting EC. In subjects with EC undergoing RPV activation mapping after circumferential ablation, the correlation between conduction delay and bipolar/unipolar potential voltage in the carina region was investigated.

Results

There were ECs in 45 out of 251 patients (17.9%). The RPV bifurcation angle (47.7° vs. 38.8°, p < .001) and ARC (37.2% vs. 29.7%, p < .001) were significantly greater in the EC (+) group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that RPV bifurcation angle (odds ratio [OR]: 1.994, p = .002) and ARC (OR: 3.490, p = .013) were independent predictors of EC. In nine patients with EC undergoing carina region mapping, the unipolar potential voltage was correlated with conduction delay in RPV with EC (R = -0.401, p < .001).

Conclusion

Anatomical features suggesting a wider RPV carina region could predict the presence of EC, and potential with high voltage could be helpful for detecting EC connection sites.

Impact of high-power short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation technique on the incidence of silent cerebral embolism: a prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation strategy has emerged as a popular approach for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), with shorter ablation time. The utilized Smart Touch Surround Flow (STSF) catheter, with 56 holes around the electrode, lowers electrode-tissue temperature and thrombus risk. Thus, we conducted this prospective, randomized study to investigate if the HPSD strategy with STSF catheter in AF ablation procedures reduces the silent cerebral embolism (SCE) risk compared to the conventional approach with the Smart Touch (ST) catheter.

METHODS

From June 2020 to September 2021, 100 AF patients were randomized 1:1 to the HPSD group using the STSF catheter (power set at 50 W) or the conventional group using the ST catheter (power set at 30 to 35 W). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in all patients, with additional lesions at operator's discretion. High-resolution cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (hDWI) with slice thickness of 1 mm was performed before and 24-72 h after ablation. The incidence of new periprocedural SCE was defined as the primary outcome. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test.

RESULTS

All enrolled AF patients (median age 63, 60% male, 59% paroxysmal AF) underwent successful ablation. Post-procedural hDWI identified 106 lesions in 42 enrolled patients (42%), with 55 lesions in 22 patients (44%) in the HPSD group and 51 lesions in 20 patients (40%) in the conventional group (p = 0.685). No significant differences were observed between two groups regarding the average number of lesions (p = 0.751), maximum lesion diameter (p = 0.405), and total lesion volume per patient (p = 0.669). Persistent AF and CHA2DS2-VASc score were identified as SCE determinants during AF ablation procedure by multivariable regression analysis. No significant differences in MoCA scores were observed between patients with SCE and those without, both immediately post-procedure (p = 0.572) and at the 3-month follow-up (p = 0.743).

CONCLUSIONS

Involving a small sample size of 100 AF patients, this study reveals a similar incidence of SCE in AF ablation procedures, comparing the HPSD strategy using the STSF catheter to the conventional approach with the ST catheter.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04408716. AF = Atrial fibrillation, DWI = Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, HPSD = High-power short-duration, ST = Smart Touch, STSF = Smart Touch Surround Flow.

Index-Guided High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Studies have suggested the superiority of high-power compared to standard-power radiofrequency ablation ablation (RFCA). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of high-power compared to standard-power RFCA guided by ablation index (AI) or lesion index (LSI).

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review and meta-analysis study comparing IGHP and IGLP approaches for AF ablation was conducted. The relevant published studies comparing IGHP and IGSP methods for RFCA in AF patients until October 2022 were collected from Cochrane, ProQuest, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. A total of 2579 AF patients from 11 studies were included, 1682 received IGHP RFCA, and 897 received IGSP RFCA. To achieve successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), the IGHP RFCA group had a significantly shorter procedure time than the IGHP RFCA group (mean difference (MD) -19.91 min; 95% CI -25.23 to -14.59 min; p < 0.01), radiofrequency (RF) application time (MD -10.92 min; 95% CI -14.70 to -7.13 min; p < 0.01), and fewer number of lesions (MD -10.90; 95% CI -18.77 to -3.02; p < 0.01) than the IGSP RFCA. First-pass PVI was significantly greater in the IGHP RFCA group than in the IGSP RFCA group (risk ratio (RR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.28; p < 0.01). The IGHP RFCA is an effective and efficient strategy for AF ablation. The superiority of IGHP RFCA includes the shorter procedure time, shorter RF application time, fewer number of lesions for complete PVI, and more excellent first-pass PVI.

Multicenter prospective comparison of conventional and high-power short duration radiofrequency application for pulmonary vein isolation: the high-power short-duration radiofrequency application for faster and safer pulmonary vein ablation (POWER FAST III) trial

BACKGROUND

Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PV) with high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency application (RFa) may reduce the duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, without compromising the procedural efficacy and safety in comparison with the conventional approach. This hypothesis has been generated in several observational studies; the POWER FAST III will test it in a randomized multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS

It is a multicenter randomized, open-label and non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. AF ablation using 70 W and 9-10 s RFa is compared with the conventional technique using 25-40 W RFa guided by numerical lesion indexes. The main efficacy objective is the incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrences electrocardiographically documented during 1-year follow-up. The main safety objective is the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesions (EDEL). This trial includes a substudy of incidence of asymptomatic cerebral lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ablation.

RESULTS

A randomized clinical trial compares for the first time high-power short-duration and conventional ablation in order to obtain data about the efficacy and safety of the high-power technique in an adequate methodological context.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the POWER FAST III could support the use of the high-power short-duration ablation in clinical practice.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NTC04153747.

High-Power Short-Duration Lesion Index-Guided Posterior Wall Isolation beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation has been adopted to improve atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Although the role of HPSD is well-established in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), fewer data have assessed the impact of HPSD when addressing extra-pulmonary veins (PVs) targets. Therefore, this study aims to determine the safety, effectiveness, and acute outcomes of HPSD lesion index (LSI)-guided posterior wall isolation (PWI) in addition to PVI as an initial strategy in persistent atrial fibrillation (Pe-AF). Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent ablation of Pe-AF in our center between August 2021 and January 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients' ablation strategy was PVI plus PWI using HPSD LSI-guided isolation. RF parameters included 50 W targeting LSI values of ≥5 on the anterior part of the PVs and anterior roofline and ≥4 for the posterior PVs aspect, bottom line, and within the posterior wall (PW). We compared the LSI values with and without acute conduction gaps after the initial first-pass PWI. Left atrial mapping was performed with the EnSite X mapping system and a high-density multipolar Grid-shaped mapping catheter. We compared the procedural characteristics using HPSD (n = 35) vs. a control group (n = 46). Results: Thirty-five consecutive patients were included in the study. PWI on top of PVI was achieved in all cases in the HPSD group. First-pass PVI was achieved in 93.3% of PVs (n = 126/135). First-pass roofline block was obtained in most patients (n = 31, 88.5%), while first-pass block of the bottom line was only achieved in 51.4% (n = 18). There were no significant differences compared to the control group; first-pass PVI was achieved in 94.9% of PVs (n = 169/178), first-pass roofline block in 89.1%, and bottom-line in 45.6% of patients. To achieve complete PWI with HPSD, scattered RF applications within the PW were necessary. No electrical reconnection of the PW was found after adenosine administration and the waiting period. The procedure and RF times were significantly shorter in the HPSD group compared to the control group, with values of 116.2 ± 10.9 vs. 144.5 ± 11.3 min, and 19.8 ± 3.6 vs. 26.3 ± 6.4 min, respectively, p < 0.001. Fluoroscopy time was comparable between both groups. No procedural complications were observed. At the 12-month follow-up, 71.4% of patients remained free from AF, with no differences between the groups. Conclusions: HPSD LSI-guided PWI on top of PVI seems effective and safe. Compared to a control group, HPSD is associated with similar rates of first-pass PWI and PVI but with a shorter procedural and RF time.

Optimal conditions for high-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation using a novel, flexible-tipped, force-sensing catheter

Background

High-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) reduces procedure time; however, safety and efficacy thresholds vary with catheter design.

Objective

The study sought to determine optimal HPSD ablation conditions with a novel flexible-tipped, contact force-sensing RFA catheter.

Methods

RFA lesions were created in thigh muscle (16 swine) over a range of conditions (51-82 W, 2-40 g, 8-40 mL/min irrigation). An intracardiac study was performed (12 swine) to characterize steam pop thresholds. Lesions were created in a second intracardiac study (14 swine, n = 290 pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] lesions) with combinations of radiofrequency power, duration, and contact force. PVI was tested, animals were sacrificed, and lesions were measured.

Results

The likelihood of coagulation formation in the thigh model was <20% when power was ≤79 W, when contact force was ≤40 g, when duration was ≤11 seconds, and when irrigation rates were 8 to 40 mL/min. The impact of contact force on lesion safety and efficacy was more pronounced using HPSD (60 W/8 seconds) compared with conventional ablation (30 W/45 seconds) (P = .038). During PVI, focal atrial lesions ranged in width from 4.2 to 12.5 mm and were transmural 80.8% of the time. PVI was achieved in 13 of 14 veins. Logistic regression identified that the optimal parameters for radiofrequency application were 60 to 70 W with a duration <8 seconds and <15 g contact force.

Conclusions

Optimal HPSD lesions with this this flexible-tipped, force-sensing RFA catheter were created at 60 to 70 W for <8 seconds with <15 g contact force. Chronic studies are ongoing to assess radiofrequency parameter refinements and long-term lesion durability using these conditions.

Network meta-analysis and systematic review comparing efficacy and safety between very high power short duration, high power short duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

High-power short-duration (HPSD) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with a power of 40-50 W was proved to be safe and effective. Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) AF ablation is a novel method using >50 W to obtain more durable AF ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vHPSD ablation compared with HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation.

METHODS

A literature search for studies that reported AF ablation outcomes, including short-term freedom from atrial arrhythmia, first-pass isolation (FPI) rate, procedure time, and major complications, was conducted utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. All relevant studies were included in this analysis. A random-effects model of network meta-analysis and surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were used to rank the treatment for all outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies with 9721 patients were included in the analysis. According to the SUCRA analysis, HPSD ablation had the highest probability of maintaining sinus rhythm. Point estimation showed an odds ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-1.9) between HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation and an odds ratio of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.78-2.2) between vHPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. While the odds ratio of FPI between HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation was 3.6 (95% CI: 1.5-8.9), the odds ratio between vHPSD ablation and conventional power ablation was 2.2 (95% CI: 0.61-8.6). The procedure times of vHPSD and HPSD ablations were comparable and, therefore, shorter than that of conventional power ablation. Major complications were low in all techniques.

CONCLUSION

vHPSD ablation did not yield higher efficacy than HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. With the safety concern, vHPSD ablation outcomes were comparable with those of other techniques.

Clinical outcome of lesion size index-guided high-power radiofrequency catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

The long-term efficacy of high-power (50 W) ablation guided by lesion size index (LSI-guided HP) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains undetermined. Our study sought to assess the clinical efficacy of LSI-guided HP ablation for PVI in patients with AF and explore the potential predictors associated with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We consecutively included 186 patients with AF who underwent LSI-guided HP (50 W) ablation at Fuwai Hospital from June 2019 to October 2021. The target LSI values of 4.5-5.5 and 4.0-4.5 at the anterior and posterior walls, respectively, were used in our study. The baseline clinical characteristics, procedural and ablation data, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. The independent potential predictors associated with AF recurrence were further evaluated.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of first-pass PVI was 83.9% (156/186). A total of 11 883 lesions were analyzed, and compared with posterior walls of pulmonary veins, anterior walls had significantly lower mean contact force (8.2 ± 3.0 vs. 8.3 ± 2.3 g, p = .015), longer mean radiofrequency duration (16.9 ± 7.2 vs. 12.9 ± 4.5 s, p < .001) and higher mean LSI (4.8 ± 0.2 vs. 4.4 ± 0.2, p < .001). The overall incidence of periprocedural complications was 3.7%, and steam pops without pericardial effusion occurred in three patients (1.6%). During a mean follow-up of 24.0 ± 8.4 months, the overall AF recurrence-free survival was 87.1% after a single procedure. Patients with paroxysmal AF had a higher incidence of freedom from AF recurrence than those with persistent AF (91.2% vs. 80.8%, log-rank p = .034). Higher LSI (HR 0.50, p < .001) and paroxysmal AF (HR 0.39, p = .029) were significantly associated with decreased AF recurrence. By receiver operating characteristic analysis, the LSI of 4.7 and 4.3 for the anterior and posterior walls of the PVs had the highest predictive value for AF recurrence, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LSI-guided HP (50 W) ablation for PVI was an efficient and safe strategy and led to favorable single-procedure 2-year AF recurrence-free survival in patients with AF. Higher LSI and paroxysmal AF were independent predictors of decreased 2-year AF recurrence. The LSI of 4.7 for the anterior wall and 4.3 for the posterior wall of the PVs were the best cutoff values for predicting AF recurrence after LSI-guided HP ablation.

Distribution of excitation recoverable myocardium after radiofrequency ablation and its relation to energy application time and irrigation

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation induces excitation recoverable myocardium around durable core lesions, and its distribution may be different depending on energy delivery methods.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In coronary perfusing porcine hearts, pacing threshold through the ventricle was measured using eight-pole (1-mm distance) needle electrodes vertically inserted into myocardium before, within 3 min after and 40 min after 40 W ablation with 10-g catheter contact (Group 1: irrigation catheter for 15 s, Group 2: irrigation catheter for 40 s, Group 3: nonirrigation catheter for 15 s, Group 4: nonirrigation catheter for 40 s). Ablation was accomplished in all 12 ablations in Groups 1-3 whereas in 8/12 ablations in Group 4 because of high-temperature rise. Within 3 min after ablation, 10.0 V pacing uncaptured electrodes were distributed from the surface to inside the myocardium, and its depth was deeper in 40 s than in 15 s ablation. 40 min after ablation, excitation recovery at one or more electrodes below the durable lesion was observed in all Groups. Excitation recovery electrodes were also observed on the surface in Group 1 but not the other Groups. Accordingly, the number of excitation-recovered electrodes were larger in Group 1 than the other Groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the ablation methods, excitation recoverable myocardium was present around 1.0 mm below the durable lesions. Lesions created by short application time using an irrigation catheter may have included large excitation recoverable myocardium soon after ablation because of the presence of reversible myocardium on well-irrigated myocardial surfaces.

High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation guided by the ablation index

AIMS

To compare the two different ablation strategies, both guided by the Ablation Index (AI), in the setting of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation: high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation using 40 W on the posterior wall and 50 W elsewhere versus low-power long-duration (LPLD) using 25 W posteriorly and 35 W elsewhere.

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter nonrandomized, noninferiority study of consecutive patients referred for paroxysmal AF ablation from January 2018 to July 2019. Ablation was guided by the AI (≥500 for anterior segments, ≥450 for the roof and inferior segments and 400 posteriorly) and an interlesion distance (ILD) ≤ 6 mm. Patients were separated into two groups: HPSD vs LPLD. Acute reconnection (after adenosine trial) and 2-year outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

160 patients (61% males, median age of 62 [IQR 51-69] years), fulfilled the study inclusion criteria - 80 patients (316 pulmonary veins [PV]) in the HPSD group and 80 patients (314 PV) in the LPLD. The probability of acute PV reconnection was similar between both groups: 2.2% in HPSD, 95%CI 0.6% to 3.8% vs. 3.4% in LPLD, 95%CI 1.4% to 5.4%; p < 0.001 for noninferiority. Median PV ablation time (20 min vs 30 min, p < 0.01) and procedure duration (80 min vs 100 min, p < 0.001) were shorter in the HPSD group. After a median follow-up of 26 months, arrhythmia recurrence was similar between groups (17.5% in HPSD group vs. 18.8% in LPLD group, p = 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

In paroxysmal AF patients treated with the Ablation Index, a HPSD strategy is noninferior to the more standard LPLD ablation, while allowing for quicker procedures with shorter ablation times.

Safety profile and long-term efficacy of very high-power short-duration (60-70 W) catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results of a large comparative analysis

AIMS

This retrospective study sought to compare complication rates and efficacy of power-controlled very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) and conventional catheter ablation in a large cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 1115 consecutive patients with AF (38.7% paroxysmal, 61.3% persistent) who received first-time catheter ablation at our centre from 2015 to 2021. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation ± additional substrate ablation using an irrigated-tip catheter was performed with vHPSD (70 W/5-7 s or 60 W/7-10 s) in 574 patients and with conventional power (30-35 W/15-30 s) in 541 patients. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups (mean age 65.1 ± 11.2 years, 63.4% male). The 30-day incidence of cardiac tamponade [2/574 (0.35%) vs. 1/541 (0.18%), P = 0.598], pericardial effusion ≥ 10 mm [2/574 (0.35%) vs. 1/541 (0.18%), P = 0.598] and transient ischaemic attack [1/574 (0.17%) vs. 2/541 (0.37%), P = 0.529] was not significantly different between vHPSD and conventional ablation. No stroke, atrio-esophageal fistula, cardiac arrest or death occurred. Procedure (122.2 ± 46.8 min vs. 155.0 ± 50.5 min, P < 0.001), radiofrequency (22.4 ± 19.3 min vs. 52.9 ± 22.0 min, P < 0.001), and fluoroscopy (8.1 ± 7.2 vs. 9.2 ± 7.4, P = 0.016) duration were significantly shorter in the vHPSD group. At 12 months follow-up, freedom of any atrial arrhythmia was 44.1% vs. 34.2% (P = 0.010) in persistent AF and 78.1% vs. 70.2% in paroxysmal AF (P = 0.068).

CONCLUSION

vHPSD ablation is as safe as conventional ablation and is associated with an improved long-term efficacy in persistent AF.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of high-power vs. conventional-power radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation

Aim

To compare high-power (HP) vs. conventional-power (CP) radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled AF patients undergoing CP (30-40 W, 43 patients) or HP (50 W, 49 patients) radiofrequency ablation. Immediate pulmonary vein (PV) single-circle isolation, PV-ablation time, AF recurrence, AF recurrence-free survival, and complications were analyzed.

Results

Diabetes was more common in the CP group than in the HP group (27.91% vs. 10.20%, P = 0.029). The left PV single-circle isolation rate (62.79% vs. 65.31%), right PV single-circle isolation rate (48.84% vs. 53.06%), and bilateral PV single-circle isolation rate (32.56% vs. 38.78%; all P > 0.05) did not differ between the groups. Single-circle ablation times for the left PVs (12.79 ± 3.39 vs. 22.94 ± 6.39 min), right PVs (12.18 ± 3.46 vs. 20.67 ± 5.44 min), and all PVs (25.85 ± 6.04 vs. 45.66 ± 11.11 min; all P < 0.001) were shorter in the HP group. Atrial fibrillation recurrence within 3 months (13.95% vs. 18.37%), at 3 months (11.63% vs. 8.16%), and at 6 months after ablation (18.60% vs. 12.24%; all P > 0.05) was similar in both groups. Atrial fibrillation recurrence-free survival did not differ between the groups (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Cardiac rupture and pericardial tamponade did not occur in any patient. Pops occurred in 2 and 0 patients in the HP and CP groups, respectively (4.08% vs. 0.00%, P = 0.533).

Conclusion

High-power ablation improved operation time and efficiency without increasing complications.

Safe and effective delivery of high-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation lesions with a flexible-tip ablation catheter

Background

High-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may reduce ablation time. Concerns that catheter-mounted thermocouples (TCs) can underestimate tissue temperature, resulting in elevated risk of steam pop formation, potentially limit widespread adoption of HPSD ablation.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of HPSD and low-power, long-duration (LPLD) RFA in the context of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Methods

An open-irrigated ablation catheter with a contact force sensor and a flexible-tip electrode containing a TC at its distal end (TactiFlex^TM Ablation Catheter, Sensor Enabled^TM, Abbott) was used to isolate the left pulmonary veins (PVs) in 12 canines with HPSD RFA (50 W for 10 seconds) and LPLD RFA (30 W for a maximum of 60 seconds). PVI was assessed at 30 minutes and 28 ± 3 days postablation. Computed tomographic scans were performed to assess PV stenosis after RFA. Lesions were evaluated with histopathology.

Results

A total of 545 ablations were delivered: 252 with LPLD (0 steam pops) and 293 with HPSD RFA (2 steam pops) (P = .501). Ablation time required to achieve PVI was >3-fold shorter for HPSD than for LPLD RFA (P = .001). All 24 PVs were isolated 30 minutes after ablation, with 12/12 LPLD-ablated and 11/12 HPSD-ablated PVs still isolated at follow-up. Histopathology revealed transmural ablations for HPSD and LPLD RFA. No major adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

An investigational ablation catheter effectively delivered RFA lesions. Ablation time required to achieve PVI with HPSD with this catheter was >3-fold shorter than with LPLD RFA.

Procedural Efficiency, Efficacy, and Safety of High-Power, Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation Delivered by STSF Catheter for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Objectives

To investigate the procedural efficiency, efficacy, and safety of high-power, short-term radiofrequency ablation delivered by the SmartTouch Surround Flow (STSF) catheter for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 72 patients who were admitted with paroxysmal AF, and who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for the first time. Of these patients, 36 cases underwent low-power, long-duration (LPLD, (30–35 W/20–40 s) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) delivered by an SmartTouch (ST) catheter (control group), and the other 36 cases underwent high-power, short-duration (HPSD, (45–50 W/10–20 s) PVI delivered by a STSF catheter (study group). The baseline data, duration of PVI, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, the rate of first-pass isolation, irrigation perfusion, eschar and steam pop occurrences, intraoperative complications, and the rate of stable sinus rhythm maintenance following a blanking period of three months were analyzed between the two groups.

Results

The isolation time of bilateral PVI and procedural time in the study group were markedly less than in controls (p < 0.01). The rate of first-pass isolation in the study group was significantly higher than in the control group (95.8% vs. 84.7%, p = 0.023), while the fluid perfusion in the study group was approximately 20% less than that in the control group (767 ± 171 vs. 966 ± 227 ml, p < 0.001). We observed no severe complications in any patients. The rate of freedom from AF recurrences following a blanking period of three months showed a tendency to be higher than in controls (93.9% vs. 87.1%, p = 0.348).

Conclusions

The HPSD strategy delivered by the STSF catheter was superior to conventional LPLD ablation through the ST catheter with respect to efficiency, acute procedural effectiveness, short-term safety, and the risk of heart failure in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Comparison between High-Power Short-Duration and Conventional Ablation Strategy in Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis

High-power short-duration (HPSD) setting during radiofrequency ablation has become an attempt to improve atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment outcomes. This study ought to compare the efficacy, safety, and effectiveness between HPSD and conventional settings. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Studies that compared HPSD and conventional radiofrequency ablation settings in AF patients were included while studies performed additional ablations on nonpulmonary vein targets without clear recording were excluded. Data were pooled with random-effect model. Efficacy endpoints include first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection, free from AF, and free from atrial tachycardia (AT) during follow-up. Safety endpoints include esophagus injury rate and major complication rate. Effectiveness endpoints include complete PVI rate, total procedure time, PVI time, and PVI radiofrequency ablation (PVI RF) time. We included 22 studies with 3867 atrial fibrillation patients in total (2393 patients received HPSD radiofrequency ablation). Perioperatively, the HPSD group showed a higher first-pass PVI rate (risk ratio, $\text{RR}=1.10$ , $P=0.0001$ ) and less acute PV reconnection rate ( $\text{RR}=0.56$ , $P=0.0004$ ) than the conventional group. During follow-up, free from AF ( $\text{RR}=1.11$ , $P=0.16$ ) or AT ( $\text{RR}=1.06$ , $P=0.24$ ) rate did not differ between HPSD and conventional groups 6-month postsurgery. However, the HPSD group showed both higher free from AF ( $\text{RR}=1.17$ , $P=0.0003$ ) and AT ( $\text{RR}=1.11$ , $P<0.0001$ ) rate than the conventional group 12-month postsurgery. The esophagus injury ( $\text{RR}=0.99$ , $P=0.98$ ) and major complications ( $\text{RR}=0.76$ , $P=0.70$ ) rates did not differ between the two groups. The HPSD group took shorter total procedure time ( $\text{MD}=-33.71$ 95% CI: -43.10 to -24.33, $P<0.00001$ ), PVI time ( $\text{MD}=-21.60$ 95% CI: -25.00 to -18.21, $P<0.00001$ ), and PVI RF time ( $\text{MD}=-13.72$ , 95% CI: -14.45 to -13.00, $P<0.00001$ ) than conventional groups while complete procedure rate did not differ between two groups ( $\text{RR}=1.00$ , $P=0.93$ ). HPSD setting during AF radiofrequency ablation has better effectiveness, efficacy, and similar safety compared with the conventional setting.

Radiofrequency Current Versus Balloon-Based Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

The basis for selection of contemporary ablation technologies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. We compared procedural data and efficacy in a propensity score-matched cohort treated with 4 ablation technologies in a center mainly using cryoballoon (CB). A total of 819 consecutive patients with AF underwent PVI, using radiofrequency current (RFC) (65 patients), CB (693 patients), hot balloon (HB) (74 patients), and laser balloon (LB) (52 patients). A total of patients (82% paroxysmal AF) were selected from each group according to the propensity score. Procedural data and freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after the index procedure were compared. All pulmonary veins were isolated in all groups. Procedure time was shorter in CB and HB groups (RFC: 148 ± 53 vs CB: 85 ± 37 vs HB: 102 ± 31 vs LB: 140 ± 28 minutes, p <0.001). RFC touch-up was most commonly required for PVI in the HB group among balloon groups (40%) (p <0.001). Total complication rate was 4% to 18% without any statistical differences between groups (p = 0.123). Phrenic nerve injury occurred most often in the CB group (16%) (p <0.001). During a mean follow-up of 21 ± 6 months, there were no significant differences among groups for freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after the index procedure (RFC: 68% vs CB: 78% vs HB: 76% vs LB: 76%, p = 0.440). In conclusion, all the ablation technologies facilitate safe and efficient PVI, with slight differences in the procedural data and complications.

Optimal Lesion Size Index for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Although both high-power (HP) ablation and lesion size index (LSI) are novel approaches to make effective lesions during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), the optimal LSI in HP ablation for PVI is still unclear. Our study sought to explore the association between LSI and acute conduction gap formation and investigate the optimal LSI in HP ablation for PVI.

Methods

A total of 105 consecutive patients with AF who underwent HP ablation guided by LSI (LSI-guided HP) for PVI in our institute between June 2019 and July 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Each ipsilateral PV circle was subdivided into four segments, and ablation power was set to 50 W with target LSI values at 5.0 and 4.0 for anterior and posterior walls, respectively. We compared the LSI values with and without acute conduction gaps after the initial first-pass PVI.

Results

PVI was achieved in all patients, and the incidence of first-pass PVI was 78.1% (82/105). A total of 6,842 lesion sites were analyzed, and the acute conduction gaps were observed in 23 patients (21.9%) with 45 (0.7%) lesion points. The gap formation was significantly associated with lower LSI (3.9 ± 0.4 vs. 4.6 ± 0.4, p < 0.001), lower force-time integral (82.6 ± 24.6 vs. 120.9 ± 40.4 gs, p < 0.001), lower mean contact force (5.7 ± 2.4 vs. 8.5 ± 2.8 g, p < 0.001), shorter ablation duration (10.5 ± 3.6 vs. 15.4 ± 6.4 s, p < 0.001), lower mean temperature (34.4 ± 1.4 vs. 35.6 ± 2.6°C, p < 0.001), and longer interlesion distance (4.4 ± 0.3 vs. 4.3 ± 0.4 mm, p = 0.031). As per the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the LSI had the highest predictive value for gap formation in all PVs segments, with a cutoff of 4.35 for effective ablation (sensitivity 80.0%; specificity 75.4%, areas under the curve: 0.87). The LSI of 4.55 and 3.95 had the highest predictive value for gap formation for the anterior and posterior segments of PVs, respectively.

Conclusion

Using LSI-guided HP ablation for PVI, more than 4.35 of LSI for all PVs segments showed the best predictive value to avoid gap formation for achieving effective first-pass PVI. The LSI of 4.55 for the anterior wall and 3.95 for the posterior wall were the best cutoff values for predicting gap formation, respectively.

In vivo Lesion Index (LSI) validation in percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation

INTRODUCTION

Lesion Index (LSI) has been developed to predict lesion efficacy during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation. However, its value in predicting lesions size has still to be established. The aim of our study was to assess the lesions size reproducibility for pre-specified values of LSI reached during RF delivery in an in vivo beating heart.

METHODS

Ablation lesions were created with different values of LSI in 7 domestic pigs by means of a contact force sensing catheter (TactiCath^TM , Abbott). Lesions were identified during RF delivery by means of a 3D mapping system (EnSite^TM Precision, Abbott) and measured after heart explantation. Histology was carried out after gross examination on the first 3 lesions to confirm the accuracy of the macroscopic evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 64 myocardial lesions were created. Thirty-nine lesions were excluded from the analysis for the following reasons: histological confirmation of macroscopic lesion measurement (n=3), transmurality (n=24), unfavorable anatomic position (n=10), not macroscopically identifiable (n=2). In a final set of 25 non-transmural lesions, injury width and depth were respectively 4.6±0.6 mm and 2.6±0.8 mm for LSI=4, 7.3±0.8 mm and 4.7±0.6 mm for LSI=5, and 8.6±1.2 mm and 7.2±1.1 mm for LSI=6. A strong linear correlation was observed between LSI and lesion width (r=0.87, p<0.00001) and depth (r=0.89, p<0.00001). Multiple linear regression analysis identified LSI as the only ablation parameter that significantly predicted lesion width (p<0.001) and depth (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our in vivo study, LSI proved highly predictive of lesion size and depth. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[Catheter ablation : Developments and technique selection]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and an important risk factor for the occurrence of cardiovascular events. According to current guidelines, rhythm-controlling therapy is recommended only for symptomatic AF. Even in symptomatic AF there is still only a class IIa-recommendation for catheter ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal AF. Meanwhile, current studies have shown an advantage of the early rhythm control compared to a rate control, as well as a benefit of catheter ablation compared to antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment. The gold standard of catheter ablation for AF therapy is pulmonary vein isolation, which has been mainly radiofrequency-based in the past. However, cryoablation as a first-line therapy of paroxysmal AF is increasingly gaining importance, as the latest studies showed shorter procedure times, lower reintervention rates and improved life quality after cryoablation. Nevertheless, using these standard techniques, the risk of adverse events is still given through collateral damage. The field high-power short duration ablation is currently topic of ongoing AF research, which describes a radiofrequency ablation with higher energy levels, given over shorter duration, with a consecutive lower recurrence rate as well as procedure time. The new ablation techniques also include the pulsed field ablation, which allows ablation through very fast delivery of electrical pulses and causes isolated damage to myocardial cells without collateral damage. This promising technique passed the efficiency and safety testing in preclinical studies. To validate this technique further randomized trials are needed.

Meta-analysis of high power short duration in atrial fibrillation ablation - a superior efficient ablation strategy

BACKGROUND

The high power short duration (HPSD) approach was hoped to further improve the efficacy and safety in radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), compared with Low power long duration (LPLD). However, the conclusion was controversial based on the previous limited data. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate whether the clinical benefits of HPSD are superior to that of LPLD.

METHODS

The PubMed, OVID, the Cochrane Library, and Elsevier's ScienceDirect databases were searched for clinical studies to compare HPSD and LPLD approach by simple search strings benefiting to a wider screened scope.

RESULTS

Fifteen trials with 3255 patients were included in this analysis. Pooled analyses suggested that HPSD was associated with a lower recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) at 1-year follow-up (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.67, p < .0001), benefitted from AF recurrence reduced (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.67, p < .0001), rather than atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter (AT/AFL), but similar at 6 months follow-up, with a decreased oesophageal thermal injury (ETI) (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.77, p = .002). Meanwhile, the HPSD approach benefitted to increase first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (FPI) (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.64, p < .00001) and decrease acute pulmonary vein re-isolation (PVR) (OR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.58, p < .00001), both mainly embodied in left pulmonary veins (PVs). HPSD showed a decreased procedural time (SMD: -0.95; 95% CI: -1.06 to -0.85, p < .00001), ablation number for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (SMD: -0.41; 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.24, p < .00001) and fluoroscopy time (SMD: -0.22; 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.12, p < .0001), which benefits from PVI + additional ablation strategy (SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.46 to -0.21, p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The HPSD approach was associated with decreasing post-ablation AF recurrence in the 1-year follow-up, ETI, acute PVR (increasing FPI correspondingly), procedural time, ablation number for PVI and fluoroscopy time, benefitted to improve clinical outcomes and procedural process with improved safety.

Procedural characteristics of pulmonary vein isolation with high-power short-duration setting compared to conventional setting

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of high-power short-duration (HP-SD) ablation compared to conventional ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

We enrolled consecutive 158 drug-refractory symptomatic AF patients (119 males, mean age 63 ± 10 years) who had undergone first radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). PVI was performed using the conventional setting (20–35 W) in 73 patients (Conventional group) and using the HP-SD setting (45–50 W) in 85 patients (HP-SD group). The rate of first pass isolation, remaining gaps after circumferential ablation, dormant conduction, and the radiofrequency application time in each pulmonary vein (PV) were compared between the groups.

Results

The first pass isolation ratio was significantly higher in the HP-SD group than in the Conventional group (81% vs. 65%, P = 0.027) in the right PV, but did not differ in the left PV. The remaining gaps were fewer in the right superior PV (4% vs. 21%, P = 0.001) and left inferior PV (1% vs. 8%, P = 0.032) areas, and the radiofrequency application time in each PV was shorter (right PV, 12.0 ± 8.9 min vs. 34.0 ± 31.7 min, P < 0.001; left PV, 10.6 ± 3.6 min vs. 25.7 ± 22.3 min, P < 0.001) in the HP-SD group than in the Conventional group.

Conclusion

The use of the HP-SD setting might contribute to improve the first pass isolation rate and to shorten the radiofrequency application time in each PV.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02459-2.

Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

High power short duration (HPSD) ablation strategy is proposed to be more effective than low power long duration (LPLD) for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Although small trials abound, data from a large cohort are lacking. This meta-analysis compares all the existing studies comparing these two approaches to evaluate perceived advantages of one over the other.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases identified studies comparing HPSD to LPLD ablation. All the analyses used the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ablation settings varied widely across 20 studies comprising 2,136 patients who underwent HPSD and 1,753 patients who underwent LPLD. The pooled incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after HPSD ablation was 20% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.25; I2=88%]. Atrial arrhythmia recurrences were significantly less frequent with HPSD ablation (incidence risk ratio=0.66; 95% CI: 0.49-0.88; I2=72%; p=0.004). Procedural, fluoroscopy, and ablation times were significantly shorter with HPSD ablation. First-pass pulmonary vein isolations (PVIs) were significantly more [odds ratio (OR)=2.94; 95% CI: 1.50-5.77; I2=89%; p=0.002), and acute pulmonary vein reconnections (PVRs) were significantly lesser (OR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.28-0.62; I2=62%; p<0.001) in the HPSD group. Although radiofrequency energy was significantly higher, esophageal thermal injuries (ETI) were lower with HPSD ablation. Acute complications, including steam-pops, were rare and statistically similar in both the groups.

CONCLUSION

HPSD ablation enables faster first-pass PVI with fewer PVRs, similar ETI rates, rare collateral damage, and lower recurrence of atrial arrhythmia in the long term than LPLD. Randomized controlled studies with a larger cohort are indicated both to confirm the benefit of HPSD ablation and standardize the ablation protocol.

Esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation is an established method for the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Esophageal thermal injuries, such as esophageal erosion, ulceration and periesophageal nerve injury leading to gastric hypomotility, are important complications associated with pulmonary vein isolation. In this review article, we describe the mechanisms, characteristics and the predictors of esophageal thermal injury associated with pulmonary vein isolation.

Actual tissue temperature during ablation index-guided high-power short-duration ablation versus standard ablation: Implications in terms of the efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Actual in vivo tissue temperatures and the safety profile during high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation have not been clarified.

METHODS

We conducted an animal study in which, after a right thoracotomy, we implanted 6-8 thermocouples epicardially in the superior vena cava, right pulmonary vein, and esophagus close to the inferior vena cava. We recorded tissue temperatures during a 50 W-HPSD ablation and 30 W-standard ablation targeting an ablation index (AI) of 400 (5-15 g contact force).

RESULTS

Maximum tissue temperatures reached with HSPD ablation were significantly higher than that reached with standard ablation (62.7 ± 12.5 vs. 52.7 ± 11.4°C, p = 0.033) and correlated inversely with the distance between the catheter tip and thermocouple, regardless of the power settings (HPSD: r = -0.71; standard: r = -0.64). Achievement of lethal temperatures (≥50°C) was within 7.6 ± 3.6 and 12.1 ± 4.1 s after HPSD and standard ablation, respectively (p = 0.003), and was best predicted at cutoff points of 5.2 and 4.4 mm, respectively. All HPSD ablation lesions were transmural, but 19.2% of the standard ablation lesions were not (p = 0.011). There was no difference between HPSD and standard ablation regarding the esophageal injury rate (30% vs. 33.3%, p > 0.99), with the injury appearing to be related to the short distance from the catheter tip.

CONCLUSIONS

Actual tissue temperatures reached with AI-guided HPSD ablation appeared to be higher with a greater distance between the catheter tip and target tissue than those with standard ablation. HPSD ablation for <7 s may help prevent collateral tissue injury when ablating within a close distance.

Regional differences in the predictors of acute electrical reconnection following high-power pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) is associated with long procedure times and large radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Although the efficacy of high-power PVI (HP-PVI) has been recently established, the determinants of acute PVR following HP-PVI remain unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated data on 62 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing unipolar signal modification (USM)-guided HP-PVI. A 50-W RF wave was applied for 3-5 seconds after USM. In the segments adjacent to the esophagus (SAEs), the RF time was limited to 5 seconds. Each circle was subdivided into six regions (segments), and the possible predictors of acute PVR, including minimum contact force (CFmin), minimum force-time integral (FTImin), minimum ablation index (AImin), minimum impedance drop (Imp-min), and maximum inter-lesion distance (ILDmax), were assessed in each segment.

RESULTS

We investigated 1162 ablations in 744 segments (including 124 SAEs). Acute PVR was observed in 21 (17%) SAEs and 43 (7%) other segments (P = .001). The acute PVR segments were characterized by significantly lower CFmin, FTImin, AImin, and Imp-min values in the segments other than the SAEs and larger ILDmax values in the SAEs. Furthermore, lower Imp-min and larger ILDmax values independently predicted acute PVR in the segments other than the SAEs and SAEs (odds ratios 0.90 and 1.39 respectively). Acute PVR was not significantly associated with late atrial fibrillation recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoiding PVR remains a challenge in HP-PVI cases, but it might be resolved by setting the optimal target impedance drop and lesion distance values.

Influence of power setting on superior vena cava potential during right pulmonary vein isolation

PURPOSE

High-power short-duration (HP-SD) ablation could reduce collateral tissue damage by shortening the conductive heating phase. However, it is difficult to evaluate the transmural effect of ablation lesions during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures. The present study aimed to evaluate the change in superior vena cava (SVC) potential delay as a surrogate marker of collateral tissue damage during right PVI, which is adjacent to SVC.

METHODS

Out of 250 consecutive patients who underwent PVI, 86 patients in whom SVC potential during sinus rhythm was recorded both before and after right PVI were analyzed. In 46 of the patients, an HP-SD setting of 45-50 W was used (HP-SD group). In the remaining 40 patients, a conventional power setting of 20-30 W was used (conventional group). We compared the change in SVC potential delay after right PVI, radiofrequency energy, and mean contact force in the anterior-superior right PVI line, which was close to the posterior aspect of SVC, between the two groups.

RESULTS

Although the total delivered radiofrequency energy (2,924 J vs. 2,604 J) and the mean contact force (18.5 g vs. 16.0 g) in the SVC overlapping area did not differ, the change in SVC potential delay after right PVI was significantly longer in the conventional group compared to the HP-SD group (5.0 ms vs. 0.0 ms, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The changes in SVC potential delay after right PVI might be a surrogate marker of collateral tissue damage according to the used energy settings.

High-power, short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation: Pros and cons

This article reviews and compares the rationale and evidence supporting high-power, short-duration radiofrequency (RF) ablation with those of conventional-power, conventional-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). The pros and cons of each approach, biophysics of ablation, pre-clinical studies informing clinical utilization, and the accumulated clinical evidence are presented. Both conventional-power, conventional-duration RF ablation and high-power, short-duration ablation are similarly safe, and effective approaches for AF ablation. Theoretical advantages of high-power, short-duration ablation, including greater procedure efficiency and limited conductive heating of collateral structures, must be weighed against the narrower safety margin related to rapid energy delivery during high power ablation.

High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

We sought to compare the effectiveness and safety of high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with conventional RFA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched until 15 May 2020 for relevant studies comparing HPSD vs. conventional RFA in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for AF. A total of 15 studies involving 3718 adult patients were included in our meta-analysis (2357 in HPSD RFA and 1361 in conventional RFA). Freedom from atrial arrhythmia was higher in HPSD RFA when compared with conventional RFA [odds ratio (OR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.90; P = 0.009]. Acute PV reconnection was lower (OR 0.56, P = 0.005) and first-pass isolation was higher (OR 3.58, P < 0.001) with HPSD RFA. There was no difference in total complications between the two groups (P = 0.19). Total procedure duration [mean difference (MD) -37.35 min, P < 0.001], fluoroscopy duration (MD -5.23 min, P = 0.001), and RF ablation time (MD -16.26 min, P < 0.001) were all significantly lower in HPSD RFA. High-power short-duration RFA also demonstrated higher freedom from atrial arrhythmia in the subgroup analysis of patients with paroxysmal AF (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.29-2.50; P < 0.001), studies with ≥50 W protocol in the HPSD RFA group (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.18; P = 0.02] and studies with contact force sensing catheter use (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.21-2.25; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

High-power short-duration RFA was associated with better procedural effectiveness when compared with conventional RFA with comparable safety and shorter procedural duration.

The superiority of high-power short-duration radiofrequency catheter ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) using the high-power short duration (HPSD) results in better ablation lesion formation in the swine model. This systematic review and meta-analysis purposed to investigate the safety and efficacy profile between HPSD and low-power long-duration (LPLD) ablation strategies to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.

METHODS

We completed the literature review after identifying the relevant articles comparing HPSD and LPLD ablation methods for AF recorded in ClinicalTrials.com, CENTRAL, PubMed, and ScienceDirect until February 2021. The overall effects were calculated using pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) for categorical and continuous data, respectively. We also estimated the 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The HPSD strategy took shorter procedure time (MD = -33.75 min; 95% CI = -44.54 to -22.97; P < .01), fluoroscopy time (MD = -5.73 min; 95% CI = -8.77 to -2.70; P < .001), and ablation time (MD = -17.71; 95% CI = -21.02 to -14.41) than LPLD strategy. The HPSD RFCA was correlated with lower risk of esophageal thermal injury (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.94; P = .02). The HPSD method resulted in higher first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (RR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.64; P < .01), lower PV reconnection (RR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.64; P < .01), and lower recurrent AF (RR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.96; P = .02) than LPLD strategy.

CONCLUSION

HPSD RFCA was superior to the conventional LPLD RFCA in terms of safety and efficacy in treating AF patients.

Novel concepts in atrial fibrillation ablation-breaking the trade-off between efficacy and safety

Despite substantial technological and procedural advances that have improved the efficacy and safety of AF ablation in recent years, the long-term durability of ablation lesions is still not satisfactory. There also remains concern regarding rare but potentially life-threatening procedure-related complications like cardiac tamponade and atrioesophageal fistulae. Current ablation strategies are aiming to optimize the trade-off between efficacy and safety, where more extensive ablation appears to inevitably increase the risk of collateral injury. However, new forms of energy application may have the potential to resolve this quandary. The emerging concept of high power-short duration radiofrequency ablation features a more favorable lesion geometry that appears ideally suited to create contiguous lesions in the thin-walled atrium. Moreover, novel non-thermal ablation methods based on electroporation appear to provide a unique selectivity for cardiomyocytes and to spare surrounding tissues composed of other cell types. Both, high power-short duration and electroporation ablation might have the potential to break the trade-off between effective lesions and collateral damage and to substantially improve risk-benefit ratios in AF ablation. In addition, both approaches lead to considerable reductions in ablation times. However, their putative benefits regarding efficacy, efficiency, and safety remain to be proven in randomized controlled trials.

[Pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency ablation]

Catheter ablation represents the primary treatment for most arrhythmias. The effectiveness of catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation is superior to drug therapy. Therefore, catheter ablation has been established as an increasingly common procedure in clinical routine. In this context, the electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVI) constitutes the cornerstone of the interventional therapy of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. This article describes the procedure of pulmonary vein isolation utilizing radiofrequency point-by-point ablation. It shall be a practical guide for the staff in the electrophysiological laboratory. This article continues a series of manuscripts focusing on interventional electrophysiology topics in the course of EP (electrophysiology) training.This article describes the procedure of pulmonary vein isolation utilizing radiofrequency point-by-point ablation. It shall be a practical guide for the staff in the electrophysiological laboratory. This article continues a series of manuscripts dealing with topics of interventional electrophysiology in the course of EP training.

The Cutting Edge of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

This article describes the advances in catheter ablation for AF that have allowed the creation of more durable and efficient lesions. It describes advances in high-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation, radiofrequency balloon devices, ultra-low cryoablation and irreversible electroporation. It also considers the way these devices may change the way catheter ablation is performed for AF.

Safety and Efficacy of High Power Shorter Duration Ablation Guided by Ablation Index or Lesion Size Index in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

High power shorter duration (HPSD) ablation may lead to safe and rapid lesion formation. However, the optimal radio frequency power to achieve the desired ablation index (AI) or lesion size index (LSI) is insubstantial. This analysis aimed to appraise the clinical safety and efficacy of HPSD guided by AI or LSI (HPSD-AI or LSI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

The Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to November 2020 were searched for studies comparing HPSD-AI or LSI and low power longer duration (LPLD) ablation.

Results

Seven trials with 1013 patients were included in the analysis. The analyses verified that HPSD-AI or LSI revealed benefits of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (RR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.05–1.56, P = 0.01) and acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.48–0.88, P = 0.005) compared with LPLD. HPSD-AI or LSI showed higher freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.14–1.53, P = 0.0002) in the subgroup analysis of studies with PVI ± (with or without additional ablation beyond PVI). HPSD-AI or LSI could short procedural time (WMD: −22.81; 95% CI, −35.03 to −10.60, P = 0.0003), ablation time (WMD: −10.80; 95% CI: −13.14 to −8.46, P < .00001), and fluoroscopy time (WMD: −7.71; 95% CI: −13.71 to −1.71, P = 0.01). Major complications and esophageal lesion in HPSD-AI or LSI group were no more than LDLP group (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.20–1.69, P = 0.32) and (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.43–1.61, P = 0.59).

Conclusions

HPSD-AI or LSI was efficient for treating AF with shorting procedural, ablation, and fluoroscopy time, higher first-pass PVI, and reducing acute PVR and may increase freedom from AT for patients with additional ablation beyond PVI compared with LPLD. Moreover, complications and esophageal lesion were low and no different between two groups.

High-power, short-duration ablation in the coronary sinus: clinical cases and preliminary observations on swine hearts

Purpose

Coronary sinus-related arrhythmias are common; however, it is difficult to perform radiofrequency (RF) ablation at these sites efficiently and safely. High-power, short-duration ablation (HPSD) is a proven alternative strategy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI); whether it can be applied to ablation of the coronary sinus is unknown. The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of HPSD ablation in the coronary sinus.

Methods

Firstly, we demonstrated 4 clinical cases of 3 types of arrhythmias who had unsuccessful ablation with standard power initially, but received successful ablations with HPSD. Secondly, RF ablation was performed in the coronary sinus ostium (CSO) and middle cardiac vein (MCV) of 4 in vitro swine hearts. Two protocols were compared: HPSD (45 W/5 S×5 rounds) and a conventional strategy that used low-power, long-duration ablation (LPLD: 25 W/10 S ×5 rounds). The total duration of HPSD protocol was 25 s, and which of LPLD was 50 s.

Results

A total of 28 lesions were created. HPSD can produce longer, wider, deeper, and larger lesions than LPLD. This difference was more pronounced when the ablation was in the MCV. One instance of steam pop occurred during LPLD in the MCV.

Conclusions

HPSD is an effective alternative strategy for ablation in coronary sinus according to clinical applications and preliminary animal study. However, the safety needs to be further evaluated based on more animal and clinical studies.

Safety and efficacy of high power shorter duration ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is effective but hampered by pulmonary veins reconnection because of insufficient lesions. High power shorter duration ablation (HPSD) was seen to increase efficacy and safety. This analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of HPSD in patients with AF.

METHODS

The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing HPSD and Low power longer duration (LPLD) ablation.

RESULTS

A total of seven trials with 2023 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled analyses demonstrated that HPSD showed a benefit of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) [risk ratio (RR): 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-1.37, P < .001]. HPSD could reduce recurrence of atrial arrhythmias (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50-0.98, P = .04). Additionally, HPSD was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [Weighted Mean Difference, (WMD): -44.62; 95% CI, -63.00 to -26.23, P < .001], ablation time (WMD: -21.25; 95% CI: -25.36 to -17.13, P < .001), and fluoroscopy time (WMD: -4.13; 95% CI: -7.52 to -0.74, P < .001). Moreover, major complications and esophageal thermal injury (ETI) were similar between two groups (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.44-1.30, P = .31) and (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.17-2.39, P = .51).

CONCLUSION

HPSD was safe and efficient for treating AF with clear advantages of procedural features, it also showed benefits of higher first-pass PVI and reducing recurrence of atrial arrhythmias compared with the LPLD. Moreover, major complications and ETI were similar between two groups.

Ablation Index-guided high-power (50 W) short-duration for left atrial anterior and roofline ablation: Feasibility, procedural data, and lesion analysis (AI High-Power Linear Ablation)

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility, procedural data, and lesion characteristics of the anterior line (AL) and roofline (RL) ablation by using ablation index (AI)-guided high power (50 W) among patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS

Data from 35 consecutive patients with macro-reentrant left atrial tachycardia or substrate at the left atrium anterior wall or roof after previous PVI were collected. Ablation power was set to 50 W, targeting AI 500 for AL and 400 for RL. The first-pass conduction block (FPB) was evaluated. The AL was arbitrarily divided into three (caudal, middle, and cranial) segments to analyze the location of conduction gaps in non-FPB patients.

RESULTS

A total of 32 AL and 17 RL were deployed and FPB was achieved in 24 (75%) and 14 (82%) of them, respectively. In the non-FPB group, the most frequent gap location along the AL was the middle third. The final block of AL was achieved in 97%, and the block of RL was achieved in 100%. The radiofrequency (RF) ablation time was short (2.9 ± 0.8 min for AL and 46.2 ± 15.6 s for RL). For AL, the female gender was significantly more frequent in FPB than in non-FPB patients (p = .028); patients with non-FPB were associated with significantly longer RF time as compared to patients with FPB (204 ± 47 s vs. 161 ± 41 s; p = .02). No procedural complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

AI-guided high-power (50 W) ablation appears to be a feasible, effective, and fast technique for AL and RL ablation.

Efficiency, Safety, and Efficacy of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF). Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is performed using a point-by-point method to achieve durable PVI. However, this procedure remains complex and time-consuming, and the long-term clinical outcomes are still not satisfactory. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the clinical application of high-power short-duration (HPSD) approaches in the field of RFCA. HPSD ablation, distinguishing it from the conventional ablation strategy, delivers RF energy at a high power and saves the dwell time at each site. It is unknown whether the HPSD approach can bring some gratifying changes in the field of RF energy ablation. A number of experimental studies and clinical studies have been conducted regarding this topic. The review aimed to summarize the research findings and evaluate the procedural efficiency, safety, and clinical outcomes of the HPSD approach based on the evidence available to date.

High-power short-duration ablation of atrial fibrillation: A contemporary review

Catheter ablation using radiofrequency (RF) energy has been widely used to treat patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The optimal levels of power and duration to increase the success rate while minimizing complications have not been fully established. Different centers continue to use various power protocols for catheter ablation of AF. Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the impact of power output on efficacy and safety of RF ablation for AF. High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation can be performed safely with similar procedural efficacy as low-power long-duration ablation strategy. HPSD ablation has the potential to shorten procedural and RF times and create more durable and localized lesions.

HPSD ablation for AF high-power short-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation: A review

This manuscript reviews the literature for all in silico, ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies of high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablations. It reviews the biophysics of RF energy delivery applicable to HPSD and the use of surrogate endpoints to guide the duration of HPSD ablations. In silico modeling shows that a variety of settings in power, contact force and RF duration can result in the same surrogate endpoint value of ablation index and several HPSD combinations produce lesion volumes similar to a low-power long-duration (LPLD) RF application. HPSD lesions are broader with more endocardial effect and are slightly shallower but still transmural. The first 10 s of RF application is most important for lesion formation with diminishing effect beyond 20 s. The ideal contact force is 10-20 g with only a small effect beyond 30 g. In vitro and in vivo models confirm that HPSD makes transmural lesions that are often broader and shallower, and with proper settings, result in fewer steam pops than LPLD. One randomized trial shows better outcomes with HPSD and validates lesion size index as a surrogate endpoint. Clinical studies of HPSD using comparator groups of LPLD ablations uniformly show shorter procedure times and shorter total RF energy delivery for HPSD. HPSD generally has a higher first pass vein isolation rate and a lower acute vein reconnection rate than LPLD. Although not dramatically different from LPLD, long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation and complication rates seem slightly better with HPSD.

Esophageal Thermal Injury after Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with High-Power (50 Watts) Radiofrequency Energy

Background and Objectives

Data regarding the safety of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using high-power (50 W) radiofrequency (RF) energy in Asian populations are limited. This study was conducted to evaluate the incidence and pattern of esophageal injury after high-power AF ablation in an Asian cohort.

Methods

We searched the prospective AF ablation registry to identify patients who underwent AF ablation with 50 W RF energy using the smart touch surround flow catheter (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA). Visitag™ (Biosense Webster) was used for lesion annotation with predefined settings of catheter stability (3 mm for 5 seconds) and minimum contact force (50% of time >5 g). All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at 1 or 3 days after the ablation.

Results

A total of 159 patients (mean age: 63±9 years, male: 69%, paroxysmal AF: 45.3%, persistent AF: 27.7%, long-standing persistent AF: 27.0%) were analyzed. Initially, 26 patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation with 50 W for 5 seconds at each point. The remaining 133 patients underwent prolonged RF duration (anterior 10 seconds and posterior 6 seconds). The incidence rates of esophageal erythema/erosion and superficial ulceration were 1.3% for each type of the lesion. Food stasis, a suggestive finding of gastroparesis, was observed in 25 (15.7%) patients. There were no cases of cardiac tamponade, stroke, or death.

Conclusions

In Asian patients, AF ablations using 50 W resulted in very low rates of mild esophageal complications.

Comparison of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for treating atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

High power shorter duration (HPSD) ablation seen to increase efficacy and safety treating of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, comparative data between HPSD and low power longer duration (LPLD) ablation are limited.

Hypothesis

We thought that HPSD might bring more clinical benefits. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to evaluate the clinical benefits of HPSD in patients with AF.

Methods

The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing HPSD and LPLD ablation.

Results

Ten trials with 2467 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled analyses demonstrated that HPSD showed a benefit of first‐pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (risk ratio [RR]: 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10‐1.31, P < .001) and recurrence of atrial arrhythmias (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58‐0.91, P = .005). Additionally, HPSD could reduce procedural time (weighted mean difference [WMD]: −42.93; 95% CI, −58.10 to −27.75, P < .001), ablation time (WMD: −21.01; 95% CI: −24.55 to −17.47, P < .001), and fluoroscopy time (WMD: −4.11; 95% CI: −6.78 to −1.45, P < .001). Moreover, major complications and esophageal thermal injury (ETI) were similar between two groups (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.44‐1.30, P = .31) and (RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.21‐1.51, P = .26).

Conclusions

HPSD was safe and efficient for treating AF. Compared with LPLD, HPSD was associated with advantages of procedural features, higher first‐pass PVI and reducing recurrence of atrial arrhythmias. Moreover, major complications and ETI were similar between two groups.

Characteristics of Esophageal Injury in Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using a High-Power Short-Duration Setting

BACKGROUND

The mechanism of esophageal thermal injury (ETI; esophageal mucosal injury and periesophageal nerve injury leading to gastric hypomotility) remains unknown when using a high-power short-duration (HP-SD) setting. This study sought to evaluate the characteristics of esophageal injuries in atrial fibrillation ablation using a HP-SD setting.

METHODS

After exclusion of 5 patients with their esophagus at the right portion of left atrium and 21 patients with additional ablations such as box isolation and low voltage area ablation in left atrium posterior wall, 271 consecutive patients (62±10 years, 56 women) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation by radiofrequency catheter ablation were analyzed. In the 101 patients, a HP-SD setting at 45 to 50 W with an Ablation Index module was used (HP-SD group). In the remaining 170 patients before introduction of the HP-SD setting, a conventional power setting of 20 to 30 W with contact force monitoring was used (conventional group). We performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy after pulmonary vein isolation in all patients and investigated the incidence and characteristics of ETI.

RESULTS

Although the incidence of ETI was significantly higher in the HP-SD group compared with the conventional group (37% versus 22%, P=0.011), the prevalence of esophageal lesions did not differ between the groups (7% versus 8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of the HP-SD setting (odds ratio, 6.09, P<0.001), and the parameters that suggest anatomic proximity surrounding the esophagus, were independent predictors of ETI. However, the majority of ETI in the HP-SD group was gastric hypomotility, and the thermal injury was limited to the shallow layer of the periesophageal wall using the HP-SD setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of the HP-SD setting was a strong predictor of ETI, it could avoid deeper thermal injuries that reach the esophageal mucosal layer.