Multicenter prospective comparison of conventional and high-power short duration radiofrequency application for pulmonary vein isolation: the high-power short-duration radiofrequency application for faster and safer pulmonary vein ablation (POWER FAST III) trial

BACKGROUND

Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PV) with high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency application (RFa) may reduce the duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, without compromising the procedural efficacy and safety in comparison with the conventional approach. This hypothesis has been generated in several observational studies; the POWER FAST III will test it in a randomized multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS

It is a multicenter randomized, open-label and non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. AF ablation using 70 W and 9-10 s RFa is compared with the conventional technique using 25-40 W RFa guided by numerical lesion indexes. The main efficacy objective is the incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrences electrocardiographically documented during 1-year follow-up. The main safety objective is the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesions (EDEL). This trial includes a substudy of incidence of asymptomatic cerebral lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ablation.

RESULTS

A randomized clinical trial compares for the first time high-power short-duration and conventional ablation in order to obtain data about the efficacy and safety of the high-power technique in an adequate methodological context.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the POWER FAST III could support the use of the high-power short-duration ablation in clinical practice.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NTC04153747.

Mechanisms of Intra-Atrial Re-Entrant Tachycardias in Congenital Heart Disease: Types and Predictors

Intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia (IART) is a severe complication in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-related IART is the most frequent mechanism. However, due to fibrosis and surgical scars, non-CTI-related IART is frequent. The main objective of this study was to describe the types of IART, circuit locations, and to analyze predictors of CTI versus non-CTI-related IART. This is an observational study that includes all consecutive patients with CHD who underwent a first IART ablation in a single referral tertiary hospital from January 2009 to December 2015 (94 patients; 39.4% women; age: 36.55 ± 14.9 years, 40.4% with highly complex cardiac disease). During the study, 114 IARTs were ablated (1.21 ± 0.41 IARTs per patient). CTI-related IART was the only arrhythmia in 51% (n = 48) of patients; non-CTI-related IART was the only mechanism in 27.7% (n = 26), and 21.3% of patients (n = 20) presented the two types of IART. Severe dilation of the systemic ventricle, absence of severe dilation of the venous atrium, highly complex cardiac defects, and nontypical electrocardiography (ECG) were related to non-CTI-related IART in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, nontypical ECG (odds ratio 3.64; 1.01 to 4.9; p = 0.049) and grade III CHD complexity (odds ratio 9.43; 1.44 to 11.7; p = 0.001) were predictors of non-CTI-related IART. In conclusion, in our population with a high proportion of complex CHD, CTI-related IART was the most frequent mechanism, although non-CTI-related IART was present in 49% (alone or with concomitant CTI-related IART). High-grade CHD complexity and nontypical ECG were strongly related to non-CTI IART.

Intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease: factors associated with disease severity

Aim

Intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia (IART) is a common complication in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) and is related to increased morbidity and mortality. Few reports have been published about factors associated to IART severity. The aim of this study is to analyse factors associated to severe clinical presentation of IART.

Methods and Results

Observational study of all consecutive CHD patients who underwent a first IART ablation from January 2009 to December 2015 (94 patients, 39.4% female, and age: 36.55 ± 14.9 years). Severe clinical presentation was defined as heart failure, syncope, shock, electromechanical dissociation (EMD), or aborted sudden death. The majority of patients had moderately or highly complex cardiac defect (90.4%). Types of IART included cavotricuspid isthmus(CTI) dependent in 51% (48), non-CTI-related in 22.3% (20), and both types in 27.7% (26). In 38 patients (40.4%), a severe event occurred and in 16 (17%), the symptoms included shock, syncope, sudden death, or EMD. In 21 (22.3%), severe symptoms were the first manifestation of IART. In multivariate analysis, transposition of the great arteries (TGA) with right systemic ventricle (OR 5.32, 95% C.I. 1.6-7.02, P = 0.0005) and severe dilation of the venous atrium (VsA) (OR 4.17; 95% CI 1.4-8.12, P = 0.0009) were factors independently associated with severity.

Conclusion

In our series of 94 CHD patients with a high proportion of moderately to highly complex cardiac defects, severe consequences of IART were frequent. Transposition of the great arteries with systemic right ventricle and severe dilation of VsA were independently associated to severity. Early invasive procedures should be considered for these high-risk patients.

Predictors of Acute Failure Ablation of Intra-atrial Re-entrant Tachycardia in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: Cardiac Disease, Atypical Flutter, and Previous Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia (IART) in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) increases morbidity and mortality. Radiofrequency catheter ablation has evolved as the first-line treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze the acute success and to identify predictors of failed IART radiofrequency catheter ablation in CHD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The observational study included all consecutive patients with CHD who underwent a first ablation procedure for IART at a single center from January 2009 to December 2015 (94 patients, 39.4% female, age: 36.55±14.9 years). In the first procedure, 114 IART were ablated (acute success: 74.6%; 1.21±0.41 IART per patient) with an acute success of 74.5%. Cavotricuspid isthmus-related IART was the only arrhythmia in 51%; non-cavotricuspid isthmus-related IART was the only mechanism in 27.7% and 21.3% of the patients had both types of IART. Predictors of acute radiofrequency catheter ablation failure were as follows: nonrelated cavotricuspid isthmus IART (odds ratio 7.3; confidence interval [CI], 1.9-17.9; P=0.04), previous atrial fibrillation (odds ratio 6.1; CI, 1.3-18.4; P=0.02), transposition of great arteries (odds ratio, 4.9; CI, 1.4-17.2; P=0.01) and systemic ventricle dilation (odds ratio 4.8; CI, 1.1-21.7; P=0.04) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83±0.056 (CI, 0.74-0.93, P=0.001). After a mean follow-up longer than 3.5 years, 78.3% of the patients were in sinus rhythm (33.1% of the patients required more than 1 radiofrequency catheter ablation procedure).

CONCLUSIONS

Although ablation in CHD is a challenging procedure, acute success of 75% can be achieved in moderate-highly complex CHD patients in a referral center. Predictors of failed ablation are IART different from cavotricuspid isthmus, previous atrial fibrillation, and markers of complex CHD (transposition of great arteries, systemic ventricle dilation).

Life-threatening and life-saving inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks

An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead dislodgement into the right atrium is a dangerous situation, particularly in patients in atrial fibrillation because atrial fibrillation can be sensed as ventricular fibrillation and true ventricular fibrillation induced with an inappropriate shock. In the presence of shocks, ICD interrogation should be performed as soon as possible.