A novel light-cured glass-ionomer system for improved dental restoratives

Cytotoxic Evaluation and Determination of Organic and Inorganic Eluates from Restorative Materials

Over the last years, diverse commercial resin-based composites have dominated as dental filling materials. The purpose of the present study was to determine organic and inorganic eluates from five restorative materials using GC/MS and ICP–OES and to compare the effect on cell survival of human gingival fibroblasts of a conventional and a bioactive resin. Five commercially available restorative materials were employed for this study: Activa^TM Bioactive Restorative, ENA HRi, Enamel plus HRi Biofunction, Fuji II LC Capsule, and Fuji IX Capsule. Disks that were polymerized with a curing LED light or left to set were immersed in: 1 mL methanol or artificial saliva for GC/MS analysis, 5mL deionized water for ICP–OES, and 5mL of culture medium for cell viability. Cell viability was investigated with a modified staining sulforhodamine B assay.The following organic substances were detected: ACP, BHT, BPA, 1,4-BDDMA, CQ, DBP, DMABEE, HEMA, MCE, MeHQ, MOPA, MS, TMPTMA, and TPSb and the ions silicon, aluminum, calcium, sodium, and barium. Activa Bioactive Restorative was found to be biocompatible. Elution of organic substances depended on material’s composition, the nature of the solvent and the storage time. Ions’ release depended on material’s composition and storage time. The newly introduced bioactive restorative was found to be more biocompatible.

Resin-modified glass ionomer containing calcium glycerophosphate: physico-mechanical properties and enamel demineralization

Sources of calcium and phosphate have been added to dental restorative materials to improve their anticaries effect.

Ion release, antimicrobial and physio-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement containing micro or nanosized hexametaphosphate, and their effect on enamel demineralization

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of hexametaphosphate microparticles (mHMP) or nanoparticles (nHMP) incorporated in glass ionomer cement (GIC) on antimicrobial and physico-mechanical properties, fluoride (F) release, and enamel demineralization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

HMP solutions were obtained at concentrations of 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12%, for screening of antimicrobial activity. Next, mHMP or nHMP at 6, 9, and 12% were incorporated into a resin-modified GIC and the antibacterial activity was evaluated. The resistance to diametral tensile and compressive strength, surface hardness, and degree of monomer conversion as well as F and HMP releases of GICs were determined. Furthermore, specimens were attached to enamel blocks and submitted to pH-cycling, and mineral loss was determined. Parametric and non-parametric tests were performed, after checking data homoscedasticity (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

HMP solutions at 6, 9, and 12% demonstrated the best antibacterial activity. GIC containing HMP showed better antibacterial effects at 9 and 12% for nHMP. Regarding F and HMP releases, the highest levels of release occurred for groups containing 9 and 12% nHMP. With the increase in HMP concentration, there was lower mineral loss. However, the incorporation of mHMP or nHMP in GIC reduced values of physico-mechanical properties when compared to the control GIC.

CONCLUSIONS

nHMP improves antimicrobial activity and fluoride release, and decreases enamel demineralization, but reduces the physico-mechanical properties of GIC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The association of GIC/HMP could be an alternative material for patients at high risk for dental caries and could be indicated for low-stress regions or provisional restorations.

Degree of conversion and hardness of two different systems of the Vitrebond™ glass ionomer cement light cured with blue LED

This study investigated the physicochemical properties of the new formulation of the glass ionomer cements through hardness test and degree of conversion by infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Forty specimens (n = 40) were made in a metallic mold (4 mm diameter x 2 mm thickness) with two resin-modified glass ionomer cements, Vitrebond™ and Vitrebond™ Plus (3M/ ESPE). Each specimen was light cured with blue LED with power density of 500 mW/cm(2) during 30 s. Immediately after light curing, 24h, 48h and 7 days the hardness and degree of conversion was determined. The Vickers hardness was performed by the MMT-3 microhardness tester using load of 50 gm force for 30 seconds. For degree of conversion, the specimens were pulverized, pressed with KBr and analyzed with FT-IR (Nexus 470). The statistical analysis of the data by ANOVA showed that the Vitrebond™ and Vitrebond™ Plus were no difference significant between the same storage times (p > 0.05). For degree of conversion, the Vitrebond™ and Vitrebond™ Plus were statistically different in all storage times after light curing. The Vitrebond™ showed higher values than Vitrebond™ Plus (p < 0.05). The performance of Vitrebond™ had greater results for degree of conversion than Vitrebond™ Plus. The correlation between hardness and degree of conversion was no evidence in this study.