1
|
Hazime D, Burner E. Social support via Internet communication technology for diabetes self-management: a scoping review. Mhealth 2024; 10:18. [PMID: 38689617 PMCID: PMC11058598 DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-23-34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The global prevalence of diabetes has been increasing over the past 30 years, leading to a rise in complications; diabetes is the leading cause of amputations, blindness, and kidney failure in developed countries. Diabetes self-management is challenging due to the complex lifestyle changes required. Social support from family and friends plays a crucial role in overcoming barriers to healthy behavior choices. Integrating Internet and communication technologies with social support interventions has the potential to improve diabetes self-management. Methods A scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library databases for studies combining diabetes, Internet and communication technologies, and social support interventions. Inclusion criteria focused on adult patients with diabetes and primarily Internet and communication technologies-based strategies to initiate and enhance social support. Data abstraction included study population, design, outcomes, social support domains emphasized, support relationship intervention strategy, and Internet and communication technologies modality. Results The review identified 39 articles and 33 unique studies representing 27 unique interventions utilizing peer web forums, interactive voice recordings, messaging-based interventions (including Short Message Service and instant messaging), and email as Internet and communication technologies modalities. Various outcomes were reported, including improvements in perception of social support, psychosocial well-being, behavior changes, and clinical outcomes. Existing support relationships may be more effective in promoting behavior change and clinical outcomes compared to developing new relationships. Studies that explicitly measured patients' perception of support consistently showed improvements in psycho-social, behavioral, and clinical outcomes. Conclusions This scoping review highlights the pivotal role of social support in diabetes self-management. By integrating Internet and communication technologies into interventions, diverse modalities such as web forums and text messaging have shown promise in enhancing patients' perception of support and improving psychosocial well-being, behavior changes, and clinical outcomes. The emphasis on leveraging existing support relationships, rather than establishing new ones, underscores the effectiveness of personalized, patient-centered approaches. These findings provide essential insights for healthcare strategies, emphasizing the need to harness technology and existing social networks to empower individuals in managing diabetes effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Hazime
- Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Burner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nelson LA, Spieker AJ, Greevy RA, Roddy MK, LeStourgeon LM, Bergner EM, El-Rifai M, Aikens JE, Wolever RQ, Elasy TA, Mayberry LS. Glycemic outcomes of a family-focused intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes: Main, mediated, and subgroup effects from the FAMS 2.0 RCT. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.09.11.23295374. [PMID: 37745473 PMCID: PMC10516064 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.11.23295374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Aims Family/friends Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) is a self-care support intervention delivered via mobile phones. We evaluated FAMS effects on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and intervention targets among adults with type 2 diabetes in a 15-month RCT. Methods Persons with diabetes (PWDs) and their support persons (family/friend, optional) were randomized to FAMS or control. FAMS included monthly phone coaching and text messages for PWDs, and text messages for support persons over a 9-month intervention period. Results PWDs (N=329) were 52% male, 39% from minoritized racial or ethnic groups, with mean HbA1c 8.6±1.7%. FAMS improved HbA1c among PWDs with a non-cohabitating support person (-0.64%; 95% CI [-1.22%, -0.05%]), but overall effects were not significant. FAMS improved intervention targets including self-efficacy, dietary behavior, and family/friend involvement during the intervention period; these improvements mediated post-intervention HbA1c improvements (total indirect effect -0.27%; 95% CI [-0.49%, -0.09%]) and sustained HbA1c improvements at 12 months (total indirect effect -0.19%; 95% CI [-0.40%, -0.01%]). Conclusions Despite improvements in most intervention targets, HbA1c improved only among PWDs engaging non-cohabitating support persons suggesting future family interventions should emphasize inclusion of these relationships. Future work should also seek to identify intervention targets that mediate improvements in HbA1c.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsay A. Nelson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Andrew J. Spieker
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Robert A. Greevy
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - McKenzie K. Roddy
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lauren M. LeStourgeon
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Erin M. Bergner
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Merna El-Rifai
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - James E. Aikens
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ruth Q. Wolever
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Osher Center for Integrative Health at Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Tom A. Elasy
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lindsay S. Mayberry
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lyles CR, Nguyen OK, Khoong EC, Aguilera A, Sarkar U. Multilevel Determinants of Digital Health Equity: A Literature Synthesis to Advance the Field. Annu Rev Public Health 2023; 44:383-405. [PMID: 36525960 PMCID: PMC10329412 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071521-023913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Current digital health approaches have not engaged diverse end users or reduced health or health care inequities, despite their promise to deliver more tailored and personalized support to individuals at the right time and the right place. To achieve digital health equity, we must refocus our attention on the current state of digital health uptake and use across the policy, system, community, individual, and intervention levels. We focus here on (a) outlining a multilevel framework underlying digital health equity; (b) summarizingfive types of interventions/programs (with example studies) that hold promise for advancing digital health equity; and (c) recommending future steps for improving policy, practice, and research in this space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney R Lyles
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA;
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- School of Public Health, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Oanh Kieu Nguyen
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Elaine C Khoong
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA;
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Adrian Aguilera
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- School of Social Welfare, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Urmimala Sarkar
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA;
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mayberry LS, El-Rifai M, Nelson LA, Parks M, Greevy RA, LeStourgeon L, Molli S, Bergner E, Spieker A, Aikens JE, Wolever RQ. Rationale, design, and recruitment outcomes for the Family/Friend Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) 2.0 randomized controlled trial among adults with type 2 diabetes and their support persons. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 122:106956. [PMID: 36208719 PMCID: PMC10364455 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-care behaviors help reduce hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and prevent or delay type 2 diabetes (T2D) complications. Individualized interventions that support goal setting and self-monitoring improve self-care and HbA1c in the short-term; engaging family and friends may enhance and/or sustain effects. Family/Friend Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) is a mobile phone-delivered intervention (i.e., phone coaching and text message support) based on Family Systems Theory which was successfully piloted among diverse adults with T2D. METHODS We made improvements to FAMS and conducted iterative usability testing to finalize FAMS 2.0 before evaluation in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Adult persons with diabetes (PWDs) who enrolled were asked to invite a support person (friend or family member) to participate alongside them. For the RCT, dyads were randomly assigned to FAMS 2.0 or enhanced treatment as usual (control) for the first 9 months of the 15-month trial. Outcomes include PWDs' HbA1c and psychosocial well-being (including diabetes distress) and support persons' own diabetes distress and support burden. RESULTS We recruited RCT participants from April 2020 through October 2021 (N = 338 PWDs with T2D; 89% [n = 300] with a support person). PWDs were 52% male, 62% non-Hispanic White, aged 56.9 ± 11.0 years with HbA1c 8.7% ± 1.7% at enrollment; 73% cohabitated with their enrolled support person. Data collection is ongoing through January 2023. CONCLUSION Findings will inform the utility of engaging family/friends in self-care behaviors for both PWD and support person outcomes. Using widely available mobile phone technology, FAMS 2.0, if successful, has potential for scalability. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04347291 posted April 15, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay S Mayberry
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Merna El-Rifai
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lyndsay A Nelson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Makenzie Parks
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Robert A Greevy
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lauren LeStourgeon
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Samuel Molli
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Erin Bergner
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Andrew Spieker
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - James E Aikens
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ruth Q Wolever
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Osher Center for Integrative Health at Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rosland AM, Piette JD, Trivedi R, Lee A, Stoll S, Youk AO, Obrosky DS, Deverts D, Kerr EA, Heisler M. Effectiveness of a Health Coaching Intervention for Patient-Family Dyads to Improve Outcomes Among Adults With Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2237960. [PMID: 36374502 PMCID: PMC9664266 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE More than 75% of US adults with diabetes do not meet treatment goals. More effective support from family and friends ("supporters") may improve diabetes management and outcomes. OBJECTIVE To determine if the Caring Others Increasing Engagement in Patient Aligned Care Teams (CO-IMPACT) intervention improves patient activation, diabetes management, and outcomes compared with standard care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial was conducted from November 2016 to August 2019 among participants recruited from 2 Veterans Health Administration primary care sites. All patient participants were adults aged 30 to 70 years with diabetes who had hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels greater than 8% of total hemoglobin (to convert to proportion of total hemoglobin, multiply by 0.01) or systolic blood pressure (SBP) higher than 150 mm Hg; each participating patient had an adult supporter. Of 1119 recruited, 239 patient-supporter dyads were enrolled between November 2016 and May 2018, randomized 1:1 to receive the CO-IMPACT intervention or standard care, and followed up for 12 to 15 months. Investigators and analysts were blinded to group assignment. INTERVENTIONS Patient-supporter dyads received a health coaching session focused on dyadic information sharing and positive support techniques, then 12 months of biweekly automated monitoring telephone calls to prompt dyadic actions to meet diabetes goals, coaching calls to help dyads prepare for primary care visits, and after-visit summaries. Standard-care dyads received general diabetes education materials only. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Intent-to-treat analyses were conducted according to baseline dyad assignment. Primary prespecified outcomes were 12-month changes in Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13) and UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) 5-year diabetes-specific cardiac event risk scores. Secondary outcomes included 12-month changes in HbA1c levels, SBP, diabetes self-management behaviors, diabetes distress, diabetes management self-efficacy, and satisfaction with health system support for the involvement of family supporters. Changes in outcome measures between baseline and 12 months were analyzed using linear regression models. RESULTS A total of 239 dyads enrolled; among patient participants, the mean (SD) age was 60 (8.9) years, and 231 (96.7%) were male. The mean (SD) baseline HbA1c level was 8.5% (1.6%) and SBP was 140.2 mm Hg (18.4 mm Hg). A total of 168 patients (70.3%) lived with their enrolled supporter; 229 patients (95.8%) had complete 12-month outcome data. In intention-to-treat analyses vs standard care, CO-IMPACT patients had greater 12-month improvements in PAM-13 scores (intervention effect, 2.60 points; 95% CI, 0.02-5.18 points; P = .048) but nonsignificant differences in UKPDS 5-year cardiac risk (intervention effect, 1.01 points; 95% CI, -0.74 to 2.77 points; P = .26). Patients in the CO-IMPACT arm also had greater 12-month improvements in healthy eating (intervention effect, 0.71 d/wk; 95% CI, 0.20-1.22 d/wk; P = .007), diabetes self-efficacy (intervention effect, 0.40 points; 95% CI, 0.09-0.71 points; P = .01), and satisfaction with health system support for the family supporter participants' involvement (intervention effect, 0.28 points; 95% CI, 0.07-0.49 points; P = .009); however, the 2 arms had similar improvements in HbA1c levels and in other measures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, the CO-IMPACT intervention successfully engaged patient-supporter dyads and led to improved patient activation and self-efficacy. Physiological outcomes improved similarly in both arms. More intensive direct coaching of supporters, or targeting patients with less preexisting support or fewer diabetes management resources, may have greater impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02328326.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Marie Rosland
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John D. Piette
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ranak Trivedi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, California
| | - Aaron Lee
- Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, University
| | - Shelley Stoll
- Department of Internal Medicine and the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Ada O. Youk
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - D. Scott Obrosky
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Denise Deverts
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Eve A. Kerr
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Internal Medicine and the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Michele Heisler
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Internal Medicine and the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shaffer KM, Mayberry LS, Salivar EG, Doss BD, Lewis AM, Canter K. Dyadic digital health interventions: Their rationale and implementation. PROCEDIA COMPUTER SCIENCE 2022; 206:183-194. [PMID: 36397858 PMCID: PMC9668031 DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
While most psychosocial and behavioral digital health interventions have been designed to be consumed by an individual, intervening at the level of a dyad - two interdependent individuals - can more comprehensively address the needs of both individuals and their relationship. The clinical utility of the dyadic digital health intervention approach, as well as the practical implementation of this design, will be demonstrated via three examples: eSCCIP, FAMS, and OurRelationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly M. Shaffer
- Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Lindsay S. Mayberry
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Emily Georgia Salivar
- Department of Clinical and School Psychology, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Brian D. Doss
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Amanda M. Lewis
- Nemours Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children’s Health, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Kimberly Canter
- Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Nemours Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children’s Health, Wilmington, DE, USA
| |
Collapse
|