1
|
Communicating the diagnosis of Klinefelter syndrome to children and adolescents: when, how, and who? J Community Genet 2022; 13:271-280. [PMID: 35247190 PMCID: PMC9270507 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00585-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is the most frequent sex chromosome aneuploidy in males. KS diagnosis disclosure has an important impact on diagnosis acceptance and the increase in prenatal diagnostic procedures raises questions regarding communication to children/adolescents. Limited data are currently available on this issue. The aim of the study was to investigate aspects like the best timing (when), topics (how), and healthcare professional (who), which, in the opinion of both KS patients and parents, may be considered the best for diagnosis communication to KS children/adolescents. We also analyzed how participants received the communication in real life and evaluated the differences between the responses given by parents who receive KS diagnosis before or after KS patient birth regarding disclosure of KS communication. KS adult patients, KS mothers, and KS fathers, not belonging to the same family, completed a questionnaire containing quantitative measures (5 points Likert scale), open-ended questions, and multiple choice questions. Parental responses were divided according to the timing at which the communication occurred: prenatal age diagnosis (PRE-D) or postnatal age diagnosis (POST-D). A total of 41 KS adults and 77 KS parents (53 PRE-D, 24 POST-D) were recruited. Most KS patients and most POST-D parents consider that communication should be provided before 14 years of age; most PRE-D parents consider 14–18 years of age the best period for communication. We suggest that communication should occur preferably before 18 years of age by a multidisciplinary team (endocrinologists, psychologists, geneticists, and parents) and that the information should deal not only fertility and hormonal aspects but also metabolic and cognitive features.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sutton AL, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Quillin J, Rubinsak L, Temkin SM, Gal T, Sheppard VB. Reducing Disparities in Receipt of Genetic Counseling for Underserved Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2020; 29:1131-1135. [PMID: 31794334 PMCID: PMC7462013 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Genetic counseling (GC) provides critical risk prediction information to women at-risk of carrying a genetic alternation; yet racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities persist with regard to GC uptake. This study examined patterns of GC uptake after a referral in a racially diverse population. Materials and Methods: In an urban academic medical center, medical records were reviewed between January 2016 and December 2017 for women who were referred to a genetic counselor for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Study outcomes were making an appointment (yes/no) and keeping an appointment. We assessed sociodemographic factors and clinical factors. Associations between factors and the outcomes were analyzed using chi square, and logistic regression was used for multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 510 women were referred to GC and most made appointments. More than half were white (55.3%) and employed (53.1%). No significant associations were observed between sociodemographic factors and making an appointment. A total of 425 women made an appointment and 268 kept their appointment. Insurance status (p = 0.003), marital status (p = 0.000), and work status (p = 0.039) were associated with receiving GC. In the logistic model, being married (odds ratio [OR] 2.119 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.341-3.347] p = 0.001) and having insurance (OR 2.203 [95% CI 1.208-4.016] p = 0.021) increased the likelihood of receiving counseling. Conclusions: Racial disparities in GC uptake were not observed in this sample. Unmarried women may need additional support to obtain GC. Financial assistance or other options need to be discussed during navigation as a way to lessen the disparity between women with insurance and those without.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnethea L. Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | - John Quillin
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Lisa Rubinsak
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Sarah M. Temkin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Tamas Gal
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Vanessa B. Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pokharel M, Elrick A, Canary HE, Clayton MF, Sukovic M, Champine M, Hong SJ, Kaphingst KA. Health communication roles in Latino, Pacific Islander, and Caucasian Families: A qualitative investigation. J Genet Couns 2019; 29:399-409. [PMID: 31605434 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Family communication about health is critical for the dissemination of information that may improve health management of all family members. Communication about health issues, attitudes, and behaviors in families is associated with life expectancy as well as quality of life for family members. This study addresses family communication about health by examining individual roles for family health communication and factors related to these roles, among families of three different racial/ethnic groups: Caucasians, Latinos, and Pacific Islanders. Data were collected from 60 participants recruited as 30 family dyads, 10 from each group, through qualitative semistructured interviews. Interviews were conducted with each participant separately and then together in a dyadic interview. Two coders independently coded interview transcripts using NVivo 11. Results identified the family health communication roles of collector, disseminator, health educator, and researcher. We also identified several factors related to these roles using the lens of family systems theory-the presence of chronic conditions in the family, previous experience, medical education, and family hierarchy. Findings demonstrate many similarities and relatively few differences in the family health communication roles and the related factors among the families of different race/ethnicity. Conclusions highlight implications for future research and intervention development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manusheela Pokharel
- Department of Communication Studies, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas
| | - Ashley Elrick
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Heather E Canary
- School of Communication, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Margaret F Clayton
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah.,College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Masha Sukovic
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Soo Jung Hong
- Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hamilton JG, Mays D, DeMarco T, Tercyak KP. Modeling the dyadic effects of parenting, stress, and coping on parent-child communication in families tested for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer risk. Fam Cancer 2017; 15:513-22. [PMID: 26848859 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9876-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing for BRCA genes, associated with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer risk, is an accepted cancer control strategy. BRCA genetic testing has both medical and psychosocial implications for individuals seeking testing and their family members. However, promoting open and adaptive communication about cancer risk in the family is challenging for parents of minor children. Using prospective data collected from mothers undergoing BRCA genetic testing and their untested co-parents (N = 102 parenting dyads), we examined how maternal and co-parent characteristics independently and conjointly influenced the overall quality of parent-child communication with minor children. Statistical associations were tested in accordance with the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Significant Actor effects were observed among mothers, such that open parent-child communication prior to genetic testing was positively associated with open communication 6 months following receipt of genetic test results; and among co-parents, more open parent-child communication at baseline and greater perceived quality of the parenting relationship were associated with more open parent-child communication at follow-up. Partner effects were also observed: co-parents' baseline communication and confidence in their ability to communicate with their minor children about genetic testing was positively associated with open maternal parent-child communication at follow-up. These results demonstrate that for families facing the prospect of cancer genetic testing, perceptions and behaviors of both members of child-rearing couples have important implications for the overall quality of communication with their minor children, including communication about cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jada G Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Darren Mays
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.,Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Tiffani DeMarco
- Division of Medical Genomics, Inova Translational Medicine Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Kenneth P Tercyak
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. .,Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. .,Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mauer C, Spencer S, Dungan J, Hurley K. Exploration of Male Attitudes on Partnerships and Sexuality with Female BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:290-7. [PMID: 26250348 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9870-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2015] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Women with BRCA mutations are inundated with decisions about managing cancer risks and childbearing considerations. Decisions become more complicated when women face disclosing their mutation and risk-reduction options to a romantic partner. This study identifies the concerns and perspectives of male romantic partners regarding these unique decisions. Twenty-five male participants completed an online survey posted to cancer support group message boards. Participants reported relationship changes regarding intimacy levels (n = 9), attraction (n = 2), and communication (n = 22) after mutation disclosure. Participants whose partners had not undergone prophylactic mastectomy (n = 14) reported concerns regarding sexual relations (n = 5), post-surgical appearance (n = 2), post-surgical attraction (n = 5), and health/lifespan (n = 9). Participants did not express attitude changes toward childbearing. While mutation disclosure conversations and surgical options are concerns for many BRCA mutation carriers in relationships, male partners share these concerns. Aspects of the relationship may change, but male study participants continued to support their partners. This information can benefit female BRCA mutation carriers, their current or future partners, and genetic counselors working with this particular population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Mauer
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. .,UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9323, USA.
| | - Sara Spencer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffery Dungan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karen Hurley
- Clinical Genetics Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tercyak KP, Silber E, Johnson AC, Fleischmann A, Murphy SE, Mays D, O'Neill SC, Sharkey CM, Shoretz R. Survey on Addressing the Information and Support Needs of Jewish Women at Increased Risk for or Diagnosed with Breast Cancer: The Sharsheret Experience. Healthcare (Basel) 2015; 3:324-37. [PMID: 27417765 PMCID: PMC4939535 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare3020324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2015] [Revised: 05/13/2015] [Accepted: 05/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 12% of women living in the United States will be diagnosed with breast cancer during their lifetimes. While all women face formidable challenges posed by the threat of living with or at increased risk for breast cancer, those of Ashkenazi Jewish descent face additional challenges owing to higher BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in this population. Amidst calls for population-based screening for hereditary breast cancer risk, much can be learned from the experiences of Jewish women about their needs. The present study is a secondary analysis of psychoeducational program satisfaction and evaluation data previously collected by a community organization dedicated to serving women of all Jewish backgrounds facing, or at risk for, breast cancer. Among respondents (n = 347), over one-third were referred to the organization by family or friends, most often after a cancer crisis. Of the information and support resources offered, the greatest level of engagement occurred with the one-on-one peer support and health care symposia resources. Respondents endorsed high levels of satisfaction with the programs and services, and a strong desire to give back to the community. These data suggest that culturally-relevant information and support services for Jewish women could be scaled-up for larger dissemination to meet the anticipated needs in this special population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth P Tercyak
- Division of Population Sciences, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | | | - Andrea C Johnson
- Division of Population Sciences, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | | | - Sarah E Murphy
- Division of Population Sciences, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | - Darren Mays
- Division of Population Sciences, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | - Suzanne C O'Neill
- Division of Population Sciences, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | - Christina M Sharkey
- Division of Population Sciences, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mays D, DeMarco TA, Luta G, Peshkin BN, Patenaude AF, Schneider KA, Garber JE, Tercyak KP. Distress and the parenting dynamic among BRCA1/2 tested mothers and their partners. Health Psychol 2013; 33:765-73. [PMID: 23795707 DOI: 10.1037/a0033418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the influence of dyadic parenting relationships on psychological distress among mothers tested for BRCA1/2 genetic mutations and their untested partners. METHODS Data were from a prospective study of mothers suspected to be at risk for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer who underwent genetic counseling and BRCA1/2 testing and their untested parenting partners (n = 109 parenting dyads). Participants completed assessments before and 1 month after genetic testing. Structural equation modeling was used to examine relationships among mothers' and partners' psychological distress, decisional conflict surrounding communication of test results to their offspring, and the parent-child communication relationship. Psychological distress was measured using items modified from the Brief Symptom Inventory. RESULTS Among mothers, greater psychological distress (B = 0.29, p < .001) and poorer parent-child communication (B = -0.12, p < .01) at baseline predicted greater distress at follow-up. Among partners, greater distress at baseline predicted greater distress at follow-up (B = 0.67, p < .001). Mother and partner decisional conflict at baseline were equally associated with the other dyad member's distress at follow-up (B = 1.17, p < .01), but not their own distress. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that conflicted decision-making over family communication of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genetic test results for one member of a parenting dyad adversely affects the other dyad member's psychological well-being. Interventions to improve outcomes for mothers who may be at-risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing should attend to mothers' and their partners' preferences regarding family communication about hereditary cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Mays
- Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center
| | - Tiffani A DeMarco
- Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center
| | - George Luta
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center
| | - Beth N Peshkin
- Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center
| | - Andrea F Patenaude
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology & Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | - Judy E Garber
- Center for Cancer Genetics & Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | - Kenneth P Tercyak
- Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rowland E, Metcalfe A. Communicating inherited genetic risk between parent and child: a meta-thematic synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud 2012; 50:870-80. [PMID: 23026156 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2012] [Revised: 08/17/2012] [Accepted: 09/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Communicating genetic risk is a distressing process for families affected by inherited genetic conditions. This systematic review identifies and explores the challenges faced by parents and their (non)affected or at risk children caused by the (non)disclosure of genetic risk information. DESIGN Qualitative meta-synthesis and thematic analysis. DATA SOURCES Ovid databases; Ovid 'in progress', British Nursing Index, Embase, Medline and Psychinfo were combined with searches of EBSCOhost databases; CINAHL and ERIC and Web of science and ZETOC databases using truncations of communication, chronic illness and disease and words relating to family with specific genetic conditions; Cystic Fibrosis, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer, Huntington's Disease, Neurofibromatosis and Sickle Cell Anaemia. This was augmented with free Internet and hand searches and an exploration of the bibliographies of all included papers. REVIEW METHOD All papers were quality assessed to ascertain their research quality and methodological rigour. RESULTS A total of 2033 citations were retrieved. Following the removal of duplicates, irrelevant articles and the application of an inclusion criterion, 12 articles remained. A further three papers were omitted due to poor quality leaving nine papers which focussed on the disclosure of genetic information between parent and child (<18 years). Eight papers were qualitative in design and one used a mixed method approach. Thematic synthesis produced four themes that inform the structure of the paper; disclosure, emotions involved in disclosure, desired disclosure and recommendations. CONCLUSION Disclosure of genetic risk information within families is a highly complex and affective process often resulting in delayed disclosure. This can lead to increased family tensions generated by misunderstanding, blame and secrecy. Early, age appropriate disclosure can better prepare children for future considerations such as care planning and reproductive decision-making. It also contributes to effective coping strategies that promote enhanced adaptation and emotional well being. Early disclosure also reduces parental anxieties concerning disclosure from an unwitting source. Research shows that children and young people want their parents to engage in open and honest discussions about the genetic condition. Therefore to help facilitate effective family communication health professionals should provide family centred care and better emotional and informational support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Rowland
- Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kings College London, United Kingdom.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Werner-Lin A, Hoskins LM, Doyle MH, Greene MH. 'Cancer doesn't have an age': genetic testing and cancer risk management in BRCA1/2 mutation-positive women aged 18-24. Health (London) 2012; 16:636-54. [PMID: 22547552 DOI: 10.1177/1363459312442420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Increasingly, 18-24-year-old women from hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) families are pursuing genetic testing, despite their low absolute risks of breast and ovarian cancer and the fact that evidence-based management options used with older high-risk women are not generally available. Difficult clinical decisions in older carriers take on substantially more complexity and value-laden import in very young carriers. As a result, many of the latter receive highly personal and emotionally charged cancer risk information in a life context where management strategies are not well defined. We analyzed 32 in-depth interviews with BRCA1/2 mutation-positive women aged 18-24 using techniques of grounded theory and interpretive description. Participants described feeling vulnerable to a cancer diagnosis but in a quandary regarding their care because evidence-based approaches to management have not been developed and clinical trials have not been undertaken. Our participants demonstrated a wide range of genetic and health literacy. Inconsistent recommendations, surveillance fatigue, and the unpredictability of their having health insurance coverage for surgical risk-reducing procedures led several to contemplate risk-reducing mastectomy before age 25. Parents remained a primary source of emotional and financial support, slowing age-appropriate independence and complicating patient privacy. Our findings suggest that, for 18-24-year-olds, readiness to autonomously elect genetic testing, to fully understand and act on genetic information, and to confidently make decisions with life-long implications are all evolving processes. We comment on the tensions between informed consent, privacy, and the unique developmental needs of BRCA1/2 mutation-positive women just emerging into their adult years.
Collapse
|
10
|
Tercyak KP, Mays D, DeMarco TA, Sharff ME, Friedman S. Results of an online community needs assessment for psychoeducational interventions among partners of hereditary breast cancer previvors and survivors. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14:e15. [PMID: 22257650 PMCID: PMC3846342 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2011] [Revised: 10/17/2011] [Accepted: 10/18/2011] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spouses and partners ("partners") of women at-risk for ("previvors") and surviving with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer are a primary source of support within their families. Yet, little is known about partners' needs for psychoeducational intervention to enhance their cancer risk knowledge, coping, and support role functioning. OBJECTIVE To determine the type and range of need for psychoeducational intervention among partners of hereditary breast cancer previving and surviving women, and to understand the potential role of the Internet and other communication channels in meeting that need. METHODS We conducted a secondary data analysis on partners' needs that were originally assessed via an online community-based organization devoted to hereditary breast cancer. Partners' demographic characteristics, need for psychoeducation, and likelihood of using various communication channels were assessed along with other constructs. Analyses examined commonly-occurring clusters of likely intervention use and by communication channel. RESULTS Partners (n =143) endorsed a moderately high level of need for psychoeducation and did so across multiple content areas (e.g., role functioning, decision making, communication, intimacy). Factor analysis identified three commonly-preferred communication channels: 1) self-help materials, 2) online interactions, and 3) interpersonal interactions. A cluster analysis among these factors identified three groups of partners based on their likelihood of psychoeducational intervention use (low [18%], moderate [55%], and high [27%] users). In a covariate-adjusted MANOVA, moderate and high intervention users reported significantly greater need for psychoeducation compared to low users (F(2,132) = 9.15, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS A majority of assessed partners perceived a need for psychoeducational interventions surrounding hereditary breast cancer risk. Internet-based, interactive resources may be an efficient mechanism to reach large numbers of partners with tailored content. Research is warranted to inform the design and deployment of these resources to ensure quality and high impact, and ultimately to examine ways to integrate these resources into clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth P Tercyak
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sharff ME, DeMarco TA, Mays D, Peshkin BN, Valdimarsdottir HB, Garber JE, Schneider KA, Patenaude AF, Tercyak KP. Parenting through genetic uncertainty: themes in the disclosure of breast cancer risk information to children. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2011; 16:376-82. [PMID: 22085394 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Among mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 testing and their spouses/partners, this study sought to examine decision support needs and motivations for family communication of genetic risk information to asymptomatic children. METHODS This study gathered data from 213 tested mothers and 104 of their untested parenting partners 1 month after maternal receipt of genetic test results and upon making a decision about communicating genetic information to their child (ages 8-21 years). Data include parents' perceived needs for family communication decision support, decision motivations, and parent-child communication. RESULTS Parents reported high decision support needs (e.g., educational materials, professional counseling, peer assistance). Motivations for disclosure to children among mothers and partners focused on promoting the parent-child bond and maintaining family health (55.3% and 75%, respectively) and promoting positive child affect (44.7% and 25.5%, respectively). Motivations for nondisclosure to children among mothers and partners focused on the lack of appropriateness (69.6% and 51.3%, respectively) and relative importance of genetic test results (30.4% and 48.7%, respectively). Significant discrepancies in parental motivation for family communication were observed. Decision support needs were highest among disclosing mothers with affect-related motivations [t (129)=2.47; p=0.01]. Parent-child communication was poorest among nondisclosing mothers concerned about the appropriateness of genetic information for their child [t (77)=-3.29; p=.002]. CONCLUSIONS Parents receiving information about hereditary cancer predisposition have unmet needs when making decisions about disclosing genetic risk information to their asymptomatic children. These data can guide the development of cancer risk communication decision support interventions for parents undergoing such testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- McKane E Sharff
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Patenaude AF. Commentary: Save the Children: Direct-to-Consumer Testing of Children is Premature, Even for Research. J Pediatr Psychol 2011; 36:1122-7; discussion 1128-9. [DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsr068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
13
|
Sherman KA, Kasparian NA, Mireskandari S. Psychological adjustment among male partners in response to women's breast/ovarian cancer risk: a theoretical review of the literature. Psychooncology 2010; 19:1-11. [PMID: 19472298 DOI: 10.1002/pon.1582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kerry A Sherman
- Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
DeMarco TA, Nusbaum RH, Peshkin BN, Patenaude AF, Schneider KA, Garber JE, Valdimarsdottir HB, Tercyak KP. Prevalence and correlates of mothers and fathers attending pretest cancer genetic counseling together. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2010; 78:29-33. [PMID: 19545972 PMCID: PMC2787643 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2008] [Revised: 04/01/2009] [Accepted: 05/23/2009] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of fathers' attendance at pretest cancer genetic counseling sessions with mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk, and to identify psychosocial and other correlates of fathers' attendance. METHODS One hundred and twenty-one fathers of minor-age children who were spouses/partners of women (mothers) undergoing such counseling and testing were recruited, completed a behavioral self-report survey, and provided data about their sociodemographic backgrounds, father-child cancer communication histories, parenting relationship quality, and information-seeking and perceived knowledge. RESULTS A total of 27.3% of fathers attended pretest cancer genetic counseling with mothers. Compared to fathers who did not attend pretest cancer genetic counseling, those who did had stronger parenting alliances with mothers, were more likely to have sought out information about BRCA1/2 testing, and felt more informed about testing. In an adjusted logistic regression model of session attendance, the strength of the parenting alliance was associated with a 6% increase in the likelihood of attending genetic counseling (odds ratio [OR]=1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.01, 1.12, p<.05) and greater perceived knowledge about BRCA1/2 testing was associated with a four-fold increase in the likelihood of session attendance (OR=4.03, CI=1.77, 9.37, p<.001). CONCLUSION One in three fathers attend pretest cancer genetic counseling with mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 testing; those who do have closer parenting relationships and are more informed about BRCA1/2 testing. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS When possible, providers should discuss mothers including fathers in cancer genetic counseling sessions as this may affect outcomes of HBOC genetic counseling and testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffani A. DeMarco
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rachel H. Nusbaum
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Beth N. Peshkin
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Kenneth P. Tercyak
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rew L, Mackert M, Bonevac D. A systematic review of literature about the genetic testing of adolescents. J SPEC PEDIATR NURS 2009; 14:284-94. [PMID: 19796327 DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2009.00210.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mapping of the human genome raises interest in and concern about the genetic testing of adolescents. Our purpose was to determine the attitudes and knowledge adolescents and their parents have about genetic testing. DESIGN AND METHOD This paper is a report of a systematic review of the research literature (n = 56) about the attitudes and knowledge adolescents and their parents have about genetic testing. RESULTS The majority of studies, which were descriptive in design, focused on a specific heritable disorder, were conducted in the United States, and over-sampled well-educated White females. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Results suggest that adolescents and their families have relatively positive attitudes about genetic testing and may experience both harms and benefits from testing. Nurses may be in positions to assist adolescents and their families in making decisions about genetic testing, remaining sensitive to family dynamics and issues of privacy and autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Rew
- The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Peshkin BN, DeMarco TA, Garber JE, Valdimarsdottir HB, Patenaude AF, Schneider KA, Schwartz MD, Tercyak KP. Brief assessment of parents' attitudes toward testing minor children for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes: development and validation of the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS). J Pediatr Psychol 2008; 34:627-38. [PMID: 18385162 DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk (BRCA1/2 testing) is not recommended for minor children due to its lack of immediate medical benefit and potential psychological risk. Yet, tested mothers are often interested in learning about their children's cancer risks via pediatric BRCA1/2 testing, raising a host of bioethical concerns. However, no reliable or valid tool exists to formally gauge parents' interest in such testing. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new measure for use in genetic research and consultation, known as the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS). METHODS After pretest genetic counseling and provision of a blood sample for BRCA1/2 testing, the P-TAS was administered to 187 mothers of children between 8- and 21-years-old. The measure was also given to 96 of the mothers' nontested co-parents. Analyses of the factor structure and psychometric properties of the measure were performed in mothers and confirmed in their co-parents. RESULTS The two factors of the P-TAS, labeled Attitudes and Beliefs (Factor 1) and Decision Making and Communication (Factor 2), accounted for 62.9% of the variance and were reliable (Cronbach's coefficient alphas =.70 and .90, respectively); the structure and properties were largely confirmed among co-parents. Validity was indicated through its convergence with related constructs. CONCLUSIONS This new tool may be integrated into genetic counseling research to better assess parents' attitudes and interests in pediatric BRCA1/2 testing. Such information may help guide ongoing discussions about the appropriateness of testing in adolescent or young adult children.
Collapse
|