1
|
Poulton A, Menezes M, Hardy T, Lewis S, Hui L. Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions: a systematic review of observational studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024:S0002-9378(24)01045-7. [PMID: 39362513 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2024] [Revised: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to report a summary of clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions, by performing a systematic review of published literature on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates following preimplantation genetic testing due to a monogenic indication. Additionally, we aimed to undertake a subgroup analysis of clinical outcomes of concurrent monogenic and aneuploidy screening. DATA SOURCES Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed) were searched from inception to May 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Quantitative data audits, observational studies, and case series reporting clinical outcomes for individuals undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for a monogenic indication were included. Only studies using blastocyst biopsies with polymerase chain reaction-based or genome-wide haplotyping methods for molecular analysis were eligible to reflect current laboratory practice. METHODS Quality assessment was performed following data extraction using an adaptation of the Joanna Briggs critical appraisal tool for case series. Results were extracted, and pooled mean clinical pregnancy rates and birth rates were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). We compared outcomes between those with and without concurrent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. RESULTS Our search identified 1372 publications; 51 were eligible for inclusion. Pooled data on 5305 cycles and 5229 embryo transfers yielded 1806 clinical pregnancies and 1577 births. This translated to clinical pregnancy and birth rates of 34.0% [95% CI: 32.8%-35.3%] and 29.7% [95% CI: 28.5%-31.0%] per cycle and 24.8% [95% CI: 23.6%-26.0%] and 21.7% [95% CI: 20.8%-23.1%] per embryo transfer. In studies with concurrent aneuploidy screening, clinical pregnancy and birth rates were 43.3% [95% CI: 40.2%-46.5%] and 37.6% [95% CI: 34.6%-40.8%] per cycle and 37.0% [95% CI: 33.9%-40.3%] and 31.8% [95% CI: 28.8%-35.0%] per embryo transfer. Studies without aneuploidy screening reported clinical pregnancy and birth rates of 32.5% [95% CI: 31.0%-34.1%] and 28.1% [95% CI: 26.6%-29.7%] per cycle and 21.2% [95% CI: 19.8%-22.6%] and 18.6% [95% CI: 17.3%-20.0%] per embryo transfer. CONCLUSION This systematic review reveals promising clinical outcome figures for this indication group. Additionally, synthesizing the published scientific literature on clinical outcomes from preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions provides a rigorous, noncommercial evidence base for counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Poulton
- Genetics, Monash IVF Group Ltd, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Reproductive Epidemiology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Melody Menezes
- Genetics, Monash IVF Group Ltd, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Tristan Hardy
- Genetics, Monash IVF Group Ltd, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Sharon Lewis
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Reproductive Epidemiology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Lisa Hui
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Reproductive Epidemiology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2024; 122:421-434. [PMID: 38762806 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in the United States has been increasing steadily. Moreover, the underlying technology used for 24-chromosome analysis continues to evolve rapidly. The value of PGT-A as a routine screening test for all patients undergoing in vitro fertilization has not been demonstrated. Although some earlier single-center studies reported higher live-birth rates after PGT-A in favorable-prognosis patients, recent multicenter, randomized control trials in women with available blastocysts concluded that the overall pregnancy outcomes via frozen embryo transfer were similar between PGT-A and conventional in vitro fertilization. The value of PGT-A to lower the risk of clinical miscarriage is also unclear, although these studies have important limitations. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2018.
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang L, Xu Y, Xia J, Yan H, Ding C, Shi Q, Wu Y, Liu P, Pan J, Zeng Y, Zhang Y, Chen F, Jiang H, Xu Y, Li W, Zhou C, Gao Y. Simultaneous detection of genomic imbalance in patients receiving preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M). Front Genet 2022; 13:976131. [PMID: 36246639 PMCID: PMC9559864 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.976131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Preimplantation genetic test for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) has been used to select genetic disease-free embryos for implantation during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. However, embryos tested by PGT-M have risks of harboring chromosomal aneuploidy. Hence, a universal method to detect monogenic diseases and genomic imbalances is required. Methods: Here, we report a novel PGT-A/M procedure allowing simultaneous detection of monogenic diseases and genomic imbalances in one experiment. Library was prepared in a special way that multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was integrated into the process of whole genome amplification. The resulting library was used for one-step low-pass whole genome sequencing (WGS) and high-depth target enrichment sequencing (TES). Results: The TAGs-seq PGT-A/M was first validated with genomic DNA (gDNA) and the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) products of a cell line. Over 90% of sequencing reads covered the whole-genome region with around 0.3–0.4 × depth, while around 5.4%–7.3% of reads covered target genes with >10000 × depth. Then, for clinical validation, 54 embryos from 8 women receiving PGT-M of β-thalassemia were tested by the TAGs-seq PGT-A/M. In each embryo, an average of 20.0 million reads with 0.3 × depth of the whole-genome region was analyzed for genomic imbalance, while an average of 0.9 million reads with 11260.0 × depth of the target gene HBB were analyzed for β-thalassemia. Eventually, 18 embryos were identified with genomic imbalance with 81.1% consistency to karyomapping results. 10 embryos contained β-thalassemia with 100% consistency to conventional PGT-M method. Conclusion: TAGs-seq PGT-A/M simultaneously detected genomic imbalance and monogenic disease in embryos without dramatic increase of sequencing data output.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yang
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yan Xu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Xia
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | | | - Chenhui Ding
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | | | | | - Jiafu Pan
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanhong Zeng
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | | | | | - Yanwen Xu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Yanwen Xu, ; Wei Li, ; Canquan Zhou, ; Ya Gao,
| | - Wei Li
- BGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
- Hebei Industrial Technology Research Institute of Genomics in Maternal and Child Health, Shijiazhuang, China
- *Correspondence: Yanwen Xu, ; Wei Li, ; Canquan Zhou, ; Ya Gao,
| | - Canquan Zhou
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Yanwen Xu, ; Wei Li, ; Canquan Zhou, ; Ya Gao,
| | - Ya Gao
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
- Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory for Birth Defects Screening, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Yanwen Xu, ; Wei Li, ; Canquan Zhou, ; Ya Gao,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stocker E, Johal S, Rippel L, Darrah R. Frequency of embryos appropriate for transfer following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:2043-2050. [PMID: 35920991 PMCID: PMC9474744 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02571-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify specific likelihoods that an embryo will be classified as appropriate for transfer after preimplantation genetic testing for detection of a monogenic disorder (PGT-M), with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), separated by inheritance pattern. METHODS Retrospective chart review of 181 selected PGT-M cycles performed at CooperGenomics in 2018 or 2019. For each cycle, the following main outcome data was collected: the number of embryos classified as affected with monogenic disease, the number detected to be chromosomally abnormal, the number that were recombinant, the number that had no result, and if applicable, the number which were aneuploid. RESULTS There were significantly fewer embryos appropriate to consider for transfer when PGT-A was included for autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders. There were also fewer for autosomal dominant disorders, though this was not statistically significant. When PGT-A was not included, 45.8% of autosomal dominant, 69% of autosomal recessive, and 47.8% of X-linked embryos were appropriate to consider for transfer. When PGT-A analysis was included, 29% of autosomal dominant, 41% of autosomal recessive, and 22% of X-linked embryos were appropriate to consider for transfer. 96.8% of women elect to include PGT-A when pursuing PGT-M. CONCLUSION This study resulted in specific likelihoods that an embryo would be found appropriate for clinicians and patients to consider for transfer based on the inheritance pattern of the monogenic disease being tested for and whether aneuploidy analysis was included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Stocker
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | | | - Larisa Rippel
- Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rebecca Darrah
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vriesen N, Carmany EP, Natoli JL. Clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: A systematic review. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:201-211. [PMID: 34981540 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review of the published literature on clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) for hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS). METHODS Three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE) were searched for publications related to PGT-M for HCS. When appropriate, weighted means were used to calculate clinical and live birth rates. RESULTS We identified 22 publications that reported on clinical and/or psychosocial outcomes of PGT-M for HCS. The weighted mean clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per embryo was 33.5% (11 studies, 95% CI: 29.1%, 38.2%), and the CPR per cycle with embryonic transfer was 40.1% (14 studies, 95% CI: 36.1%, 44.3%). The weighted mean live birth rate (LBR) per embryo was 28.9% (11 studies, 95% CI: 24.7%, 33.4%) and the LBR per cycle with embryonic transfer was 33.2% (13 studies, 95% CI: 29.2%, 37.4%). The limited literature regarding the psychosocial outcomes of PGT-M for HCS suggests reproductive decision-making is difficult and additional support may be desired. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that CPR and LBR following PGT-M for HCS are comparable to other monogenic disorders. Heterogeneity across studies suggests the overall CPR and LBR found may not be applicable to all HCS indications and PGT-M methodologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Vriesen
- Division of Medical Genetics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Erin P Carmany
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Jaime L Natoli
- Department of Clinical Analysis, Evidence-Based Medicine Services, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Shahani SA, Marcotte EL. Landscape of germline cancer predisposition mutations testing and management in pediatrics: Implications for research and clinical care. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:1011873. [PMID: 36225340 PMCID: PMC9548803 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1011873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
As germline genetic testing capacities have improved over the last two decades, increasingly more people are newly diagnosed with germline cancer susceptibility mutations. In the wake of this growth, there remain limitations in both testing strategies and translation of these results into morbidity- and mortality-reducing practices, with pediatric populations remaining especially vulnerable. To face the challenges evoked by an expanding diversity of germline cancer mutations, we can draw upon a model cancer-associated genetic condition for which we have developed a breadth of expertise in managing, Trisomy 21. We can additionally apply advances in other disciplines, such as oncofertility and pharmacogenomics, to enhance care delivery. Herein, we describe the history of germline mutation testing, epidemiology of known germline cancer mutations and their associations with childhood cancer, testing limitations, and future directions for research and clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa A Shahani
- Department of Pediatrics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Erin L Marcotte
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.,Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Trinh The S, Trieu Tien S, Vu Van T, Nguyen Ngoc N, Tran Ngoc Thao M, Tran Van K, Vu Nhat D, Do Nhu B. Successful Pregnancy Following Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis of Adrenoleukodystrophy by Detection of Mutation on the ABCD1 Gene. APPLICATION OF CLINICAL GENETICS 2021; 14:313-319. [PMID: 34285547 PMCID: PMC8286725 DOI: 10.2147/tacg.s318884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Background Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is a rare sex-linked recessive disorder that disrupts adrenal gland function and the white matter of the nervous system. According to recent epidemiological statistics, up to this moment, the disease is the most recorded peroxisomal disorder. ABCD1 is a gene related to ALD, with more than 850 unique mutations have been reported. Early diagnosis of the disease would help to consult families with ALD to plan for interventions to prevent passing along the pathogenic mutations to their children. Material and Methods A heterozygous ABCD1 gene mutation related to ALD found in a Vietnamese woman was used to design primers for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify the segment spanning the mutation. Then, combining sequencing methods for the PCR products, especially Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS), a protocol was developed to detect mutations on the ABCD1 gene to apply for the DNA samples of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos biopsied at the blastocyst stage to screen for pathogenic alleles. Results The established protocol for PGD of ALD detected mutant alleles in 5/8 embryos (62.5%), while the remaining 3 embryos (37.5%) did not carry any mutation. One of the 3 embryos was transferred, and a healthy female baby was born after a full-term pregnancy. Conclusion The developed protocol was helpful for the preimplantation genetic diagnosis process to help families with the monogenic disease of ALD but wish to have healthy children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Son Trinh The
- Military Institute of Clinical Embryology and Histology, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 12108, Vietnam
| | - Sang Trieu Tien
- Department of Biology and Genetics, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 12108, Vietnam
| | - Tam Vu Van
- Director Office, Hai Phong Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haiphong, 40000, Vietnam.,Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Haiphong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Haiphong, 40000, Vietnam
| | - Nhat Nguyen Ngoc
- Military Institute of Clinical Embryology and Histology, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 12108, Vietnam
| | - My Tran Ngoc Thao
- Département de formation Biologie moléculaire et cellulaire, Sorbonne University, Paris, 75006, France
| | - Khoa Tran Van
- Department of Biology and Genetics, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 12108, Vietnam
| | - Dinh Vu Nhat
- Director Office, Military Hospital 103, Hanoi, 12108, Vietnam.,Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 121-08, Vietnam
| | - Binh Do Nhu
- Division of Military Science, Military Hospital 103, Hanoi, 12108, Vietnam.,Department of Infectious Disease, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 12108, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cai Y, Ding M, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Lin F, Diao Z, Zhou J. A mathematical model for predicting the number of transferable blastocysts in next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 305:241-249. [PMID: 34218301 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06050-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the clinical factors that could be used predict the number of transferable blastocysts in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) and formed form a mathematical model to predict the chance likelihood of obtaining one transferable blastocyst, which is helpful for genetic counseling. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled couples undergoing PGT cycles for chromosomal structural rearrangement (PGT-SR, n = 363, 202 with reciprocal translocation carriers, 131 with Robertsonian translocation carriers, 30 with inversion carriers), monogenic diseases (PGT-M, n = 47), and for Aneuploidies (PGT-A, n = 132) from January 2015 to October 2018. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify the factors relevant for obtaining at least one transferable blastocyst. The factors that predict the number of biopsied blastocysts were further analyzed. RESULTS The transferable blastocyst rates were 29.94, 41.99, 49.09, 41.42, and 44.37% in the reciprocal translocation carrier, Robertsonian translocation carrier, inversion carrier, PGT-M, and PGT-A cycles, respectively. The number of transferable blastocysts in these cycles were 0.3004 × the number of biopsied blastocysts (NBB) - 0.0031, 0.4063 × NBB + 0.0460, 0.5762 × NBB - 0.3128, 0.3611 × NBB + 0.1910, and 0.4831 × NBB - 0.0970, respectively. Furthermore, the number of MII oocytes and female age were clinical predictors of NBB in reciprocal translocation and PGT-A couples, while the number of MII oocytes was the only clinical predictor in Robertsonian translocation carriers, inversion carriers, and PGT-M couples. CONCLUSIONS The number of biopsied blastocysts was the only clinical predictor of the ability to obtain a transferable blastocyst in PGT cycles; therefore, for clinical practice, theoretically the minimum numbers of biopsied blastocysts is 4 in reciprocal translocation carrier and 3 in couples undergoing PGT for other reasons. The number of MII oocytes and female age were clinical predictors of the number of biopsied blastocysts. With the mathematical models in our study as a reference, in clinical practice, clinicians will be able to conduct a more targeted genetic consultation for different kinds of PGT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunni Cai
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Ding
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - YuTing Zhang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanxin Sun
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Fei Lin
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenyu Diao
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianjun Zhou
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vuković P, Peccatori FA, Massarotti C, Miralles MS, Beketić-Orešković L, Lambertini M. Preimplantation genetic testing for carriers of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 157:103201. [PMID: 33333149 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The detection of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant has relevant implications for the patients and their family members. Family planning, prophylactic surgery and the possibility of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) to avoid transmittance of pathogenic variants to the offspring are relevant topics in this setting. PGT-M is valuable option for BRCA carriers, but it remains a controversial and underdiscussed topic. Although the advances in PGT technologies have improved pregnancy rate, there are still several important challenges associated with its use. The purpose of this review is to report the current evidence on PGT-M for BRCA1/2 carriers, ethical concerns and controversy associated with its use, reproductive implications of BRCA pathogenic variants, underlying areas in which an educational effort would be beneficial as well as possibilities for future research efforts in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Vuković
- Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia.
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20125, Italy.
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, 16132, Italy.
| | | | - Lidija Beketić-Orešković
- Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia; Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia.
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, 16132, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, 16126, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Simpson JL, Rechitsky S. Preimplantation genetic testing to reduce preterm births in assisted reproductive technology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 150:34-40. [PMID: 32524593 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The 10% rate of preterm birth rate worldwide has not been proved amenable to reduction. Avoiding multiple embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) using in vitro fertilization is one unassailable method. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to select only a single euploid embryo for transfer is one unequivocal way, maintaining 50%-60% pregnancy rates while avoiding twins. Contemporary methodology entails trophectoderm biopsy of a 5-6-day blastocyst, and cryopreservation of biopsied embryos while awaiting analysis by next generation sequencing. Embryo biopsy is safe, analytic validity for chromosomal analysis high, and global access to PGT high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe L Simpson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.,Reproductive Genetic Innovations, Northbrook, IL, USA
| | - Svetlana Rechitsky
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.,Reproductive Genetic Innovations, Northbrook, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brandsema JF, Gross BN, Matesanz SE. Diagnostic Testing for Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Clin Lab Med 2020; 40:357-367. [PMID: 32718505 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2020.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Diagnostic genetic testing for spinal muscular atrophy is key in establishing early diagnosis for affected individuals. Prenatal carrier testing of parents with subsequent testing of the fetus for homozygous SMN1 gene deletion in those at risk of this autosomal recessive disorder as well as newborn screening can identify the vast majority of affected individuals before the onset of symptoms. Patients presenting symptomatically must be genetically confirmed as soon as possible because targeted treatments are now available that profoundly impact symptoms and improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Brandsema
- Division of Neurology, Colket Translational Research Building, 10th Floor, 3501 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Brianna N Gross
- Division of Neurology, Colket Translational Research Building, 10th Floor, 3501 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Susan E Matesanz
- Division of Neurology, Colket Translational Research Building, 10th Floor, 3501 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Greco E, Litwicka K, Minasi MG, Cursio E, Greco PF, Barillari P. Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Where We Are Today. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E4381. [PMID: 32575575 PMCID: PMC7352684 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is widely used today in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) centers over the world for selecting euploid embryos for transfer and to improve clinical outcomes in terms of embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. METHODS We report the current knowledge concerning these procedures and the results from different clinical indications in which PGT is commonly applied. RESULTS This paper illustrates different molecular techniques used for this purpose and the clinical significance of the different oocyte and embryo stage (polar bodies, cleavage embryo, and blastocyst) at which it is possible to perform sampling biopsies for PGT. Finally, genetic origin and clinical significance of embryo mosaicism are illustrated. CONCLUSIONS The preimplantation genetic testing is a valid technique to evaluated embryo euploidy and mosaicism before transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ermanno Greco
- Reproductive Medicine, Villa Mafalda, 00199 Rome, Italy; (E.G.); (M.G.M.); (E.C.); (P.F.G.); (P.B.)
- UniCamillus, International Medical University, 00131 Rome, Italy
| | - Katarzyna Litwicka
- Reproductive Medicine, Villa Mafalda, 00199 Rome, Italy; (E.G.); (M.G.M.); (E.C.); (P.F.G.); (P.B.)
| | - Maria Giulia Minasi
- Reproductive Medicine, Villa Mafalda, 00199 Rome, Italy; (E.G.); (M.G.M.); (E.C.); (P.F.G.); (P.B.)
| | - Elisabetta Cursio
- Reproductive Medicine, Villa Mafalda, 00199 Rome, Italy; (E.G.); (M.G.M.); (E.C.); (P.F.G.); (P.B.)
| | - Pier Francesco Greco
- Reproductive Medicine, Villa Mafalda, 00199 Rome, Italy; (E.G.); (M.G.M.); (E.C.); (P.F.G.); (P.B.)
| | - Paolo Barillari
- Reproductive Medicine, Villa Mafalda, 00199 Rome, Italy; (E.G.); (M.G.M.); (E.C.); (P.F.G.); (P.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Toft CLF, Ingerslev HJ, Kesmodel US, Diemer T, Degn B, Ernst A, Okkels H, Kjartansdóttir KR, Pedersen IS. A systematic review on concurrent aneuploidy screening and preimplantation genetic testing for hereditary disorders: What is the prevalence of aneuploidy and is there a clinical effect from aneuploidy screening? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99:696-706. [PMID: 32039470 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In assisted reproductive technology, aneuploidy is considered a primary cause of failed embryo implantation. This has led to the implementation of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in some clinics. The prevalence of aneuploidy and the use of aneuploidy screening during preimplantation genetic testing for inherited disorders has not previously been reviewed. Here, we systematically review the literature to investigate the prevalence of aneuploidy in blastocysts derived from patients carrying or affected by an inherited disorder, and whether screening for aneuploidy improves clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS PubMed and Embase were searched for articles describing preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and/or structural rearrangements in combination with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Original articles reporting aneuploidy rates at the blastocyst stage and/or clinical outcomes (positive human chorionic gonadotropin, gestational sacs/implantation rate, fetal heartbeat/clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, or live birth/delivery rate on a per transfer basis) were included. Case studies were excluded. RESULTS Of the 26 identified studies, none were randomized controlled trials, three were historical cohort studies with a reference group not receiving aneuploidy screening, and the remaining were case series. In weighted analysis, 34.1% of 7749 blastocysts were aneuploid. Screening for aneuploidy reduced the proportion of embryos suitable for transfer, thereby increasing the risk of experiencing a cycle without transferable embryos. In pooled analysis the percentage of embryos suitable for transfer was reduced from 57.5% to 37.2% following screening for aneuploidy. Among historical cohort studies, one reported significantly improved pregnancy and birth rates but did not control for confounding, one did not report any statistically significant difference between groups, and one properly designed study concluded that preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy enhanced the chance of achieving a pregnancy while simultaneously reducing the chance of miscarriage following single embryo transfer. CONCLUSIONS On average, aneuploidy is detected in 34% of embryos when performing a single blastocyst biopsy derived from patients carrying or affected by an inherited disorder. Accordingly, when screening for aneuploidy, the risk of experiencing a cycle with no transferable embryos increases. Current available data on the clinical effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy performed concurrently with preimplantation genetic testing for inherited disorders are sparse, rendering the clinical effect from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy difficult to access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Liebst Frisk Toft
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Fertility Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Tue Diemer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Birte Degn
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Anja Ernst
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Henrik Okkels
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Inge Søkilde Pedersen
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Banker JM, Arora P, Khajuria R, Banker M. India's First Child using PGT-M, PGT-A and HLA Matching for Helping a Sibling having β-Thalassemia Major. J Hum Reprod Sci 2020; 12:341-344. [PMID: 32038086 PMCID: PMC6937767 DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_50_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
β-thalassemia is a common single-gene disorder in India, with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) being the only cure. HSCT with matched unrelated donor is less successful, whereas finding a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donor is difficult. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) with HLA matching is a novel option to have a matched sibling for HSCT for couples having an affected child. We present the first such case report in India. A couple, both carriers of β-thalassemia and having an affected son, underwent PGT-M with HLA matching combined with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies of embryos to have a β - thalassemia-free child. This resulted in birth of a 10/10 HLA-matched sibling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Parul Arora
- NOVA IVI Fertility, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hao Y, Chen D, Zhang G, Zhang Z, Liu X, Zhou P, Wei Z, Xu X, He X, Xing L, Lv M, Ji D, Chen B, Zou W, Wu H, Liu Y, Cao Y. Successful clinical application of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy. Exp Ther Med 2019; 19:956-964. [PMID: 32010257 PMCID: PMC6966177 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy (INAD) is a rare, lethal, autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease and leads to progressive impairment of movement and cognition. A couple with a proband child with calcium-independent group VI phospholipase A2 (PLA2G6)-associated INAD and a previous affected pregnancy sought pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to bear a healthy child. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment was performed and 15 blastocystic embryos were obtained at days 5 and 6, and these biopsies were amplified. PGD was performed by next-generation sequencing-based linkage analysis in conjunction with aneuploidy screening. Only two embryos were considered for transfer. In the second frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle, transfer of a mosaic PLA2G6 c.692G>T heterozygous embryo resulted in a singleton ongoing pregnancy. Prenatal diagnosis was performed using amniotic fluid cells, providing results consistent with those of PGD. The aneuploidy screen and karyotype analysis indicated that the chromosomes of the fetus were normal without any mosaicism. The present study reported the first successful PGD for INAD. For parents at risk, this strategy may successfully lead to pregnancies with embryos unlikely to develop INAD, thus providing valuable experience in reproductive management regarding INAD and potentially other single-gene disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Hao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Dawei Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Guirong Zhang
- Department of Genetics, Peking Medriv Academy of Genetics and Reproduction, Beijing 102629, P.R. China
| | - Zhiguo Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Xiaojun Liu
- Department of Genetics, Peking Medriv Academy of Genetics and Reproduction, Beijing 102629, P.R. China
| | - Ping Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Zhaolian Wei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Xiaofeng Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Xiaojin He
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Lixian Xing
- Department of Genetics, Peking Medriv Academy of Genetics and Reproduction, Beijing 102629, P.R. China
| | - Mingrong Lv
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Dongmei Ji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Beili Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Weiwei Zou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Huan Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Yajing Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| | - Yunxia Cao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.,Department of Biopreservation, Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui 230027, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Karyomapping in preimplantation genetic testing for β-thalassemia combined with HLA matching: a systematic summary. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:2515-2523. [PMID: 31758512 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01595-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the validity, accuracy, and clinical outcomes of Karyomapping in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for β-thalassemia combined with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching. METHODS A total of 128 cycles from January 2014 to December 2017 were identified, and 1205 embryos were biopsied. The case group included 88 cycles using Karyomapping for PGT-HLA, compared with 40 cycles using polymerase chain reaction-short tandem repeat (PCR-STR) as the control group. RESULTS There were significant differences in the HLA matching rate (21.34 vs. 14.37%), the matched transferable embryo rate (9.79 vs. 14.07%), the clinical pregnancy rate (65.08 vs. 41.86%), and the spontaneous miscarriage rate (2.44 vs. 22.22%) between the case and control groups. In the case group, nearly 1/3 (33.37%) of the embryos showed aneuploidy. According to the results of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotype analysis, the recombination rates of HBB (hemoglobin subunit beta) and HLA were 11.46% and 5.61% respectively. HLA gene recombination was mostly distributed between HLA-A and HLA-B and the downstream region of HLA-DQB1. In addition, STR analysis could be considered in the case of copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the region where the HLA gene is located. CONCLUSION Karyomapping contributes to accurate selection of matched embryos, along with aneuploidy screening. However, STRs assist identification in cases of LOH in the target region.
Collapse
|
18
|
Transfer of embryos with positive results following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M): experience of two high-volume fertility clinics. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:1949-1955. [PMID: 31359233 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01538-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the experiences of two large fertility clinics in which embryos with positive results following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) were transferred upon patient request, in order to explore the nature of the conditions for which these requests have been made and review ethical considerations. METHODS Retrospective review of previous embryo transfers at the NYU Langone Fertility Center and ORM Fertility was performed. Embryo transfers prior to May 2019 in which embryo biopsy and PGT-M occurred were reviewed, and transferred embryos that were positive for a monogenic disorder (excluding autosomal recessive carriers) were identified. RESULTS Seventeen patients were identified who elected to transfer 23 embryos that tested positive for nine different monogenic disorders. Most of the embryos transferred were positive for disorders that are autosomal dominant (15/23), are adult-onset (14/23), are associated with reduced penetrance (16/23), and have available management to lessen symptom severity (22/23). Transfer of positive embryos most commonly occurred for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes (9/23 embryos), particularly hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. CONCLUSIONS When unaffected embryos are not produced following in vitro fertilization with PGT-M, some patients request to transfer embryos with positive test results. The majority of transfers were for embryos positive for adult-onset, reduced penetrance diseases. As these requests will likely increase over time, it is essential to consider the practical and ethical implications.
Collapse
|
19
|
Analysis of PGT‐M and PGT‐SR outcomes at a Canadian fertility clinic. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39:866-870. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.5496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
20
|
Zanetti BF, Braga DPDAF, Azevedo MDC, Setti AS, Figueira RCS, Iaconelli A, Borges E. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases: a Brazilian IVF centre experience. JBRA Assist Reprod 2019; 23:99-105. [PMID: 30614237 PMCID: PMC6501745 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the cases of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) in fertile couples who had undergone intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in a Brazilian in vitro fertilisation (IVF) centre and determine whether these cases were different from those reported from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). METHODS This retrospective collection included data obtained from ICSI-PGT-M cycles between 2011 and 2016. The disease indication, number of biopsied embryos, biopsy stage, diagnosed and affected embryos, and cycles with embryo to transfer as well as implantation, pregnancy and miscarriage rates were analysed and compared to cycles without genetic diagnosis (PGT) and with ESHRE PGD Consortium collection XIV-XV. RESULTS From 5,070 cycles performed, 72 had indications for PGT-M. The most common time for biopsy was cleavage-stage; 93% of the embryos had a diagnostic result, 59.4% of which were genetically transferable, resulting in 68% of the cycles with transferred embryos, a 22.1% implantation rate, and a 28.6% pregnancy rate. No differences in clinical outcomes of cycles with PGT-M or without PGT were observed. The day of biopsy and diagnostic success as well as implantation, pregnancy and miscarriage rates were similar to ESHRE collection. CONCLUSIONS Although the proportion of cases with PGT-M was low, its efficacy was similar to what was reported in the European collection and represents a viable alternative for families at risk of transmitting a genetic disorder to their offspring. The main difference between our and ESHRE collection were the disease indications, which reflected the admixed, multi-ethnic Brazilian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Ferrarini Zanetti
- Fertility - Medical Group, São Paulo, SP - Brazil.,Instituto Sapientiae - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Reprodução Humana Assistida, São Paulo, SP - Brazil
| | | | | | - Amanda Souza Setti
- Fertility - Medical Group, São Paulo, SP - Brazil.,Instituto Sapientiae - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Reprodução Humana Assistida, São Paulo, SP - Brazil
| | | | - Assumpto Iaconelli
- Fertility - Medical Group, São Paulo, SP - Brazil.,Instituto Sapientiae - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Reprodução Humana Assistida, São Paulo, SP - Brazil
| | - Edson Borges
- Fertility - Medical Group, São Paulo, SP - Brazil.,Instituto Sapientiae - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Reprodução Humana Assistida, São Paulo, SP - Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liao CH, Chang MY, Ma GC, Chang SP, Lin CF, Lin WH, Chen HF, Chen SU, Lee YC, Chao CC, Chen M, Hsieh ST. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Review of Methodologies and Report of Our Experience as a Regional Reference Laboratory. Diagnostics (Basel) 2019; 9:E44. [PMID: 31018485 PMCID: PMC6627755 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics9020044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become a crucial approach in helping carriers of inherited disorders to give birth to healthy offspring. In this study, we review PGD methodologies and explore the use of amplification refractory mutation system quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) and/or linkage analysis for PGD in neurodegenerative diseases that are clinically relevant with typical features, such as late onset, and which are severely debilitating. A total of 13 oocyte retrieval cycles were conducted in 10 cases with various neurodegenerative diseases. Among the 59 embryos analyzed, 49.2% (29/59) were unaffected and 50.8% (30/59) were affected. Of the 12 embryo transfer cycles, three resulted in pregnancy, and all pregnancies were delivered. The implantation rate and livebirth rate were 23.1% (3/13) per oocyte retrieval cycle and 25.0% (3/12) per embryo transfer cycle. Allele dropout (ADO) was noted in two embryos that were classified as unaffected by ARMS-qPCR but were evidenced as affected after prenatal diagnosis, rendering the false negative rate as 6.3% (2/32). Four among the 13 cycles underwent PGD by ARMS-qPCR coupled with linkage analysis, and all were correctly diagnosed. We conclude that PGD by ARMS-qPCR and/or linkage analysis is a feasible strategy, whereas ADO is a concern when ARMS-qPCR is used as the sole technology in PGD, especially in autosomal dominant diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Hua Liao
- Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Children's Hospital, Taipei 10041, Taiwan.
| | - Ming-Yuh Chang
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Changhua Christian Children's Hospital, Changhua 50050, Taiwan.
| | - Gwo-Chin Ma
- Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50046, Taiwan.
- Department of Genomic Science and Technology, Changhua Christian Hospital Healthcare System, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50046, Taiwan.
- Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung 40601, Taiwan.
| | - Shun-Ping Chang
- Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50046, Taiwan.
- Department of Genomic Science and Technology, Changhua Christian Hospital Healthcare System, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50046, Taiwan.
| | - Chi-Fang Lin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10041, Taiwan.
| | - Wen-Hsiang Lin
- Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50046, Taiwan.
- Department of Genomic Science and Technology, Changhua Christian Hospital Healthcare System, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50046, Taiwan.
| | - Hsin-Fu Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10041, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
| | - Shee-Uan Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10041, Taiwan.
| | - Yi-Chung Lee
- Department of Neurology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
| | - Chi-Chao Chao
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 10048, Taiwan.
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50046, Taiwan.
- Department of Genomic Science and Technology, Changhua Christian Hospital Healthcare System, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50046, Taiwan.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10041, Taiwan.
- Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung 40704, Taiwan.
- Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Da-Yeh University, Changhua 51591, Taiwan.
| | - Sung-Tsang Hsieh
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 10048, Taiwan.
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liker K, Black L, Weil J, Bruce J, Bereknyei Merrell S, Bivona S, Ormond KE. Challenges of infertility genetic counseling: Impact on counselors' personal and professional lives. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:626-640. [PMID: 30821877 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2018] [Revised: 01/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Infertility genetic counselors (GCs) work with patients struggling to become pregnant who desire genetic testing of embryos and preconception genetic testing or carrier screening. Because personal and professional challenges have not been examined in this relatively new genetic counseling specialty, we investigated the difficulties infertility GCs face in their professional roles. Past and present infertility GCs in patient-facing roles were recruited through the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Purposive sampling ensured participants were diverse in clinical setting, reproductive history, and other demographics. Nineteen participants completed a semi-structured interview, at which time data saturation occurred. Thematic analysis revealed infertility GCs consider their patients more emotionally stressed than patients in other specialties. Infertility GCs relate easily to patients, build long-term patient relationships, and feel invested in the reproductive successes of patients. Participants reported heightened concern for their own fertility, leading to high personal uptake of preconception genetic and fertility tests. Participants described discomfort when counseling while visibly pregnant and reluctance to disclose their own reproductive histories. Further research is needed on the complex interactions of GCs' personal and professional lives. Peer support groups and professional dialogue about the personal effects of the role may be beneficial for infertility GCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina Liker
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Lauri Black
- Pacific Reproductive Genetic Counseling, Pacifica, California
| | - Jon Weil
- Department of Biological Sciences, California State University Stanislaus, Turlock, California
| | - Janine Bruce
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell
- Department of Surgery, Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education Center (S-SPIRE), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Stephanie Bivona
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kakourou G, Kahraman S, Ekmekci GC, Tac HA, Kourlaba G, Kourkouni E, Sanz AC, Martin J, Malmgren H, Giménez C, Gold V, Carvalho F, Billi C, Chow JFC, Vendrell X, Kokkali G, Liss J, Steffann J, Traeger-Synodinos J. The clinical utility of PGD with HLA matching: a collaborative multi-centre ESHRE study. Hum Reprod 2019; 33:520-530. [PMID: 29432583 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Has PGD-HLA been successful relative to diagnostic and clinical efficacy? SUMMARY ANSWER The diagnostic efficacy of PGD-HLA protocols was found lower in this study in comparison to published PGD-HLA protocols and to that reported for general PGD by ESHRE (78.5 vs 94.1% and vs 92.6%, respectively), while the clinical efficacy has proven very difficult to assess due to inadequate follow-up of both the ART/PGD and HSCT procedure outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The first clinical cases for PGD-HLA were reported in 2001. It is now a well-established procedure, with an increasing number of cycles performed every year. However, PGD-HLA is still offered by relatively few PGD centres, the currently available data is fragmented and most reports on PGD-HLA applications are limited in number and scope. Published systematic details on methodology, diagnostic results, overall ART success and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcomes are limited, precluding an evaluation of the true clinical utility of PGD-HLA cycles. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective multi-centre cohort study aimed to investigate the diagnostic and clinical efficacy of the PGD-HLA procedure and the aspects of PGD-HLA cycles influencing positive outcomes: birth of genetically suitable donor-baby (or babies) and HSCT. In April 2014, 32 PGD centres (Consortium members and non-members) with published/known PGD-HLA activity were invited to participate. Between February and September 2015, 14 centres submitted their data, through a custom-designed secure database, with unique login access for each centre. Data parameters covered all aspects of PGD-HLA cycles (ART, embryology and genetic diagnosis), donor-babies born and HSCT. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS From 716 cycles submitted by 14 centres (performed between August 2001 and September 2015), the quality evaluation excluded 12 cycles, leaving 704, from 364 couples. The online database, based on REDCap, a free, secure, web-based data-capture application, was customized by Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), Athens. Continuous variables are presented using mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range, and categorical variables are presented as absolute and relative frequencies. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The data included 704 HLA-PGD cycles. Mean maternal age was 33.5 years. Most couples (81.3%) requested HLA-typing with concurrent exclusion of a single monogenic disease (58.6% for beta-thalassaemia). In 92.5% couples, both partners were fertile, with an average 1.93 HLA-PGD cycles/couple. Overall, 9751 oocytes were retrieved (13.9/cycle) and 5532 embryos were analysed (7.9/cycle). Most cycles involved fresh oocytes (94.9%) and Day 3 embryo biopsy (85.3%). In 97.5% of cycles, the genotyping method involved PCR only. Of 4343 embryos diagnosed (78.5% of analysed embryos), 677 were genetically suitable (15.4% of those analysed for HLA alone, 11.6% of those analysed for HLA with exclusion of monogenic disease). Of the 364 couples, 56.6% achieved an embryo transfer (ET) and 598 embryos were transferred in 382 cycles, leading to 164 HCG-positive pregnancies (pregnancy rate/ET 41.3%, pregnancy rate/initiated cycle 23.3%) and 136 babies born (live birth rate/ET 34.3%, live birth rate/initiated cycle 19.3%) to 113 couples. Data analysis identified the following limitations to the overall success of the HLA-PGD procedure: the age of the mother undergoing the treatment cycle, the number of oocytes collected per cycle and genetic chance. HSCT was reported for 57 cases, of which 64.9% involved combined umbilical cord-blood and bone marrow transplantation from the HLA-identical sibling donor; 77.3% of transplants reported no complications. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The findings of the study may be limited as not all PGD centres with PGD-HLA experience participated. Reporting bias on completion of the online database may be another potential limitation. Furthermore, the study is based on retrospective data collection from centres with variable practices and strategies for ART, embryology and genetic diagnosis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This is the first multi-centre study evaluating the clinical utility of PGD-HLA, indicating variations in practice and outcomes throughout 15 years and between centres. The study highlights parameters important for positive outcomes and provides important information for both scientists and couples interested in initiating a cycle. Above all, the study underlines the need for better collaboration between all specialists involved in the ART-PGD/HLA procedure, as well as the need for comprehensive and prospective long-term data collection, and encourages all specialists to aim to properly evaluate and follow-up all procedures, with the ultimate aim to promote best practice and encourage patient informed decision making. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study wishes to acknowledge ESHRE for funding the customization of the REDCap database. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Kakourou
- Department of Medical Genetics, Choremio Research Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Thivon & Livadias, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - S Kahraman
- Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Unit, Piyale Pasa Bulvari, 34385 Okmeydani sisli-Instanbul, Turkey
| | - G C Ekmekci
- Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Unit, Piyale Pasa Bulvari, 34385 Okmeydani sisli-Instanbul, Turkey
| | - H A Tac
- Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Unit, Piyale Pasa Bulvari, 34385 Okmeydani sisli-Instanbul, Turkey
| | - G Kourlaba
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 5 Chatzigianni Mexi 11528, Athens, Greece
| | - E Kourkouni
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 5 Chatzigianni Mexi 11528, Athens, Greece
| | - A Cervero Sanz
- Igenomix, Parc Científic Universitat de Valéncia, Calle Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, 46980 Paterna (València), Spain
| | - J Martin
- Igenomix, Parc Científic Universitat de Valéncia, Calle Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, 46980 Paterna (València), Spain
| | - H Malmgren
- Stockholm PGD Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Karolinska vägen, 171 76 Solna, Sweden
| | - C Giménez
- Reprogenetics Spain, Carrer de Tuset, 23, 08006 Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Gold
- PGD Lab, Lis Fertility Institute, Lis Maternity and Women's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - F Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, R. Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - C Billi
- Preimplantation Diagnosis Department, Alfalab Private Diagnostic Laboratory Medical S.A., Anastasiou Georgiou 11, 115 24 Athens, Greece
| | - J F C Chow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Tsan Yuk Hospital Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Laboratory, Tsan Yuk Hospital, 30 Hospital Road, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong
| | - X Vendrell
- Reproductive Genetics Unit, Sistemas Genómicos Ltd, Ronda G.Marconi 6, 46980 Paterna (València), Spain
| | - G Kokkali
- Genesis Athens Clinic, Reproductive Medicine Unit, 14 Papanikoli Str, Chalandri 15232, Athens, Greece
| | - J Liss
- Invicta Fertility and Reproductive Center, 10 Rajska St., 80-850 Gdansk, Poland
| | - J Steffann
- Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut Imagine, INSERM UMR1163, Laboratoire de Génétique, APHP Hopital Necker-Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sévres, 75743 PARIS CEDEX 15, Paris, France
| | - J Traeger-Synodinos
- Department of Medical Genetics, Choremio Research Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Thivon & Livadias, Athens 11527, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Santos M, Yoshida IH, Zulim C, Tanada MS, Cordts EB, Barbosa CP. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in chromosome translocation 46, XX, t (9; X) (q22; q28) - a case report. JBRA Assist Reprod 2018; 22:261-262. [PMID: 29912520 PMCID: PMC6106634 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper reports the case of a patient who sought assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment and was referred to pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) on account of a chromosomal translocation presented with secondary infertility. The patient underwent a highly complex ART treatment and had 14 metaphase II oocytes collected on the day of follicular aspiration. The embryos were taken to extended culture and five were biopsied and vitrified. The embryo genetic report showed aneuploidy in four of the blastocysts, while the other resulted in 46, XX. In conclusion, chromosome translocations involving the X chromosome might result in the deregulation of gene expression and defective ovarian formation. Therefore, the genes present in the X chromosome are believed to be essential in normal ovarian function.
Collapse
|
25
|
Penzias A, Bendikson K, Butts S, Coutifaris C, Falcone T, Fossum G, Gitlin S, Gracia C, Hansen K, La Barbera A, Mersereau J, Odem R, Paulson R, Pfeifer S, Pisarska M, Rebar R, Reindollar R, Rosen M, Sandlow J, Vernon M, Widra E. The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018; 109:429-436. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
26
|
Kakourou G, Vrettou C, Moutafi M, Traeger-Synodinos J. Pre-implantation HLA matching: The production of a Saviour Child. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 44:76-89. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 04/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
27
|
Mumusoglu S, Ozbek IY, Sokmensuer LK, Polat M, Bozdag G, Papanikolaou E, Yarali H. Duration of blastulation may be associated with ongoing pregnancy rate in single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35:633-639. [PMID: 28958703 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Not all euploid embryos implant, necessitating additional tools to select viable blastocysts in preimplantation genetic screening cycles. In this retrospective cohort study, 129 consecutive patients who underwent 129 single euploid blastocyst transfers in cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles were included. All embryos were individually cultured in a time-lapse incubator from intracytoplasmic sperm injection up to trophoectoderm biopsy. Twenty-three time-lapse morphokinetic variables were tested among patients with (n = 68) or without (n = 61) ongoing pregnancy. All 23 time-lapse morphokinetic variables, apart from duration of blastulation (tB-tSB), were comparable between patients with or without ongoing pregnancy. Duration of blastulation was significantly shorter in patients with ongoing pregnancy (8.1 ± 3.2 versus 9.5 ± 3.4 h; P = 0.014); shorter duration of blastulation remained an independent predictor for ongoing pregnancy, when tested by logistic regression analysis (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.93). One important limitation of this study, and a reason for caution, is the use of multiple comparisons, which can lead to differences at the 0.05 level simply by chance or random variation. Nonetheless, the study suggests that when more than one euploid blastocyst is available, priority might be given to those with a shorter duration of blastulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sezcan Mumusoglu
- Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irem Y Ozbek
- Anatolia IVF and Women Health Centre, Cinnah Street 54 Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Lale K Sokmensuer
- Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehtap Polat
- Anatolia IVF and Women Health Centre, Cinnah Street 54 Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gurkan Bozdag
- Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Hakan Yarali
- Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey; Anatolia IVF and Women Health Centre, Cinnah Street 54 Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dimitriadou E, Melotte C, Debrock S, Esteki MZ, Dierickx K, Voet T, Devriendt K, de Ravel T, Legius E, Peeraer K, Meuleman C, Vermeesch JR. Principles guiding embryo selection following genome-wide haplotyping of preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 2017; 32:687-697. [PMID: 28158716 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION How to select and prioritize embryos during PGD following genome-wide haplotyping? SUMMARY ANSWER In addition to genetic disease-specific information, the embryo selected for transfer is based on ranking criteria including the existence of mitotic and/or meiotic aneuploidies, but not carriership of mutations causing recessive disorders. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Embryo selection for monogenic diseases has been mainly performed using targeted disease-specific assays. Recently, these targeted approaches are being complemented by generic genome-wide genetic analysis methods such as karyomapping or haplarithmisis, which are based on genomic haplotype reconstruction of cell(s) biopsied from embryos. This provides not only information about the inheritance of Mendelian disease alleles but also about numerical and structural chromosome anomalies and haplotypes genome-wide. Reflections on how to use this information in the diagnostic laboratory are lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We present the results of the first 101 PGD cycles (373 embryos) using haplarithmisis, performed in the Centre for Human Genetics, UZ Leuven. The questions raised were addressed by a multidisciplinary team of clinical geneticist, fertility specialists and ethicists. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Sixty-three couples enrolled in the genome-wide haplotyping-based PGD program. Families presented with either inherited genetic variants causing known disorders and/or chromosomal rearrangements that could lead to unbalanced translocations in the offspring. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Embryos were selected based on the absence or presence of the disease allele, a trisomy or other chromosomal abnormality leading to known developmental disorders. In addition, morphologically normal Day 5 embryos were prioritized for transfer based on the presence of other chromosomal imbalances and/or carrier information. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Some of the choices made and principles put forward are specific for cleavage-stage-based genetic testing. The proposed guidelines are subject to continuous update based on the accumulating knowledge from the implementation of genome-wide methods for PGD in many different centers world-wide as well as the results of ongoing scientific research. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our embryo selection principles have a profound impact on the organization of PGD operations and on the information that is transferred among the genetic unit, the fertility clinic and the patients. These principles are also important for the organization of pre- and post-counseling and influence the interpretation and reporting of preimplantation genotyping results. As novel genome-wide approaches for embryo selection are revolutionizing the field of reproductive genetics, national and international discussions to set general guidelines are warranted. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The European Union's Research and Innovation funding programs FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IAPP SARM: 324509 and Horizon 2020 WIDENLIFE: 692065 to J.R.V., T.V., E.D. and M.Z.E. J.R.V., T.V. and M.Z.E. have patents ZL910050-PCT/EP2011/060211-WO/2011/157846 ('Methods for haplotyping single cells') with royalties paid and ZL913096-PCT/EP2014/068315-WO/2015/028576 ('Haplotyping and copy-number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies') with royalties paid, licensed to Cartagenia (Agilent technologies). J.R.V. also has a patent ZL91 2076-PCT/EP20 one 3/070858 ('High throughout genotyping by sequencing') with royalties paid. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eftychia Dimitriadou
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cindy Melotte
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sophie Debrock
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Masoud Zamani Esteki
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kris Dierickx
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thierry Voet
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.,Single-cell Genomics Centre, Welcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Koen Devriendt
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomy de Ravel
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eric Legius
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christel Meuleman
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - box 602, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chen HF, Chen SU, Ma GC, Hsieh ST, Tsai HD, Yang YS, Chen M. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening: Current status and future challenges. J Formos Med Assoc 2017; 117:94-100. [PMID: 28888353 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2017.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a clinically feasible technology to prevent the transmission of monogenic inherited disorders in families afflicted the diseases to the future offsprings. The major technical hurdle is it does not have a general formula for all mutations, thus different gene locus needs individualized, customized design to make the diagnosis accurate enough to be applied on PGD, in which the quantity of DNA is scarce, whereas timely result is sometimes requested if fresh embryo transfer is desired. On the other hand, preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) screens embryo with aneuploidy and was also known as PGD-A (A denotes aneuploidy) in order to enhance the implantation rates as well as livebirth rates. In contrasts to PGD, PGS is still under ferocious debate, especially recent reports found that euploid babies were born after transferring the aneuploid embryos diagnosed by PGS back to the womb and only very few randomized trials of PGS are available in the literature. We have been doing PGD and/or PGS for more than 10 years as one of the core PGD/PGS laboratories in Taiwan. Here we provide a concise review of PGD/PGS regarding its current status, both domestically and globally, as well as its future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsin-Fu Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shee-Uan Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Gwo-Chin Ma
- Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan; Department of Genomic Science and Technology, Changhua Christian Hospital Healthcare System, Changhua, Taiwan; Institute of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Sung-Tsang Hsieh
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Horng-Der Tsai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Shih Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fu-Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan; Department of Genomic Science and Technology, Changhua Christian Hospital Healthcare System, Changhua, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan; Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jiang Z, Wang Y, Lin J, Xu J, Ding G, Huang H. Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 44:90-104. [PMID: 28844405 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2017] [Revised: 07/22/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is used primarily for infertility treatments to achieve pregnancy and involves procedures such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and cryopreservation. Moreover, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of ART is used in couples for genetic reasons. In ART treatments, gametes and zygotes are exposed to a series of non-physiological processes and culture media. Although the majority of children born with this treatment are healthy, some concerns remain regarding the safety of this technology. Animal studies and follow-up studies of ART-borne children suggested that ART was associated with an increased incidence of genetic, physical, or developmental abnormalities, although there are also observations that contradict these findings. As IVF, ICSI, frozen-thawed embryo transfer, and PGD manipulate gametes and embryo at a time that is important for reprogramming, they may affect epigenetic stability, leading to gamete/embryo origins of adult diseases. In fact, ART offspring have been reported to have an increased risk of gamete/embryo origins of adult diseases, such as early-onset diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and so on. In this review, we will discuss evidence related to genetic, especially epigenetic, risks of assisted reproduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziru Jiang
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinyu Wang
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Lin
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingjing Xu
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guolian Ding
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Embryo-Fetal Original Adult Disease, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Reproductive Medicine, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hefeng Huang
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Embryo-Fetal Original Adult Disease, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Reproductive Medicine, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
Abstract
Mitochondrial disease is a challenging area of genetics because two distinct genomes can contribute to disease pathogenesis. It is also challenging clinically because of the myriad of different symptoms and, until recently, a lack of a genetic diagnosis in many patients. The last five years has brought remarkable progress in this area. We provide a brief overview of mitochondrial origin, function, and biology, which are key to understanding the genetic basis of mitochondrial disease. However, the primary purpose of this review is to describe the recent advances related to the diagnosis, genetic basis, and prevention of mitochondrial disease, highlighting the newly described disease genes and the evolving methodologies aimed at preventing mitochondrial DNA disease transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsey Craven
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neuroscience, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom;
| | - Charlotte L Alston
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neuroscience, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom;
| | - Robert W Taylor
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neuroscience, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom;
| | - Doug M Turnbull
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neuroscience, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chen M, Chang SP, Ma GC, Lin WH, Chen HF, Chen SU, Tsai HD, Tsai FP, Shen MC. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of hemophilia A. Thromb J 2016; 14:33. [PMID: 27766059 PMCID: PMC5056473 DOI: 10.1186/s12959-016-0098-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a powerful tool to tackle the transmission of monogenic inherited disorders in families carrying the diseases from generation to generation. It currently remains a challenging task, despite PGD having been developed over 25 years ago. The major difficulty is it does not have an easy and general formula for all mutations. Different gene locus needs individualized, customized design to make the diagnosis accurate enough to be applied on PGD, in which the quantity of DNA is scanty, whereas timely laboratory diagnosis is mandatory if fresh embryo transfer is desired occasionally. Indicators for outcome assessment of a successful PGD program include the successful diagnosis rate on blastomeres (Day 3 cleavage-stage embryo biopsy) or trophectoderm cells (Day 5/6 blastocyst biopsy), the implantation rate per embryo transferred, and the livebirth rate per oocyte retrieval cycle. Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by various types of pathological defects in the factor VIII gene (F8). The mutation spectrum of the F8 is complex, according to our previous report, including large segmental intra-gene inversions, large segmental deletions spanning a few exons, point mutations, and total deletion caused by chromosomal structural rearrangements. In this review, the molecular methodologies used to tackle different mutants of the F8 in the PGD of HA are to be explained, and the experiences of successful use of amplification refractory mutation system-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) and linkage analysis for PGD of HA in our laboratory are also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Chen
- Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.,Department of Genomic Science and Technology, Changhua Christian Hospital Healthcare System, Changhua, Taiwan.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Shun-Ping Chang
- Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.,Department of Genomic Science and Technology, Changhua Christian Hospital Healthcare System, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Gwo-Chin Ma
- Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.,Department of Genomic Science and Technology, Changhua Christian Hospital Healthcare System, Changhua, Taiwan.,Institute of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsian Lin
- Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.,Department of Genomic Science and Technology, Changhua Christian Hospital Healthcare System, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Fu Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shee-Uan Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Horng-Der Tsai
- Institute of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Feng-Po Tsai
- Po-Yuan Women's Clinic and IVF Center, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Ching Shen
- Department of Internal Medicine, and Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|