1
|
Vendrell X, de Castro P, Escrich L, Grau N, Gonzalez-Martin R, Quiñonero A, Escribá MJ, Domínguez F. Longitudinal profiling of human androgenotes through single-cell analysis unveils paternal gene expression dynamics in early embryo development. Hum Reprod 2024:deae072. [PMID: 38622061 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION How do transcriptomics vary in haploid human androgenote embryos at single cell level in the first four cell cycles of embryo development? SUMMARY ANSWER Gene expression peaks at the fourth cell cycle, however some androcytes exhibit unique transcriptional behaviors. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The developmental potential of an embryo is determined by the competence of the oocyte and the sperm. However, studies of the contribution of the paternal genome using pure haploid androgenotes are very scarce. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This study was performed analyzing the single-cell transcriptomic sequencing of 38 androcytes obtained from 10 androgenote bioconstructs previously produced in vitro (de Castro et al., 2023). These results were analyzed through different bioinformatics software such as g: Profiler, GSEA, Cytoscape, and Reactome. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Single cell sequencing was used to obtain the transcriptomic profiles of the different androcytes. The results obtained were compared between the different cycles studied using the DESeq2 program and functional enrichment pathways using g: Profiler, Cytoscape, and Reactome. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A wave of paternally driven transcriptomic activation was found during the third-cell cycle, with 1128 upregulated and 225 downregulated genes and the fourth-cell cycle, with 1373 upregulated and 286 downregulated genes, compared to first-cell cycle androcytes. Differentially expressed routes related to cell differentiation, DNA-binding transcription, RNA biosynthesis and RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory complex, and cell death were found in the third and fourth with respect to the first-cell cycle. Conversely, in the fourth cell cycle, 153 downregulated and 332 upregulated genes were found compared with third cell cycle, associated with differentially expressed processes related to E-box binding and zinc finger protein 652 (ZNF652) transcription factor. Further, significant overexpression of LEUTX, PRAMEF1, DUXA, RFPL4A, TRIM43, and ZNF675 found in androgenotes, compared to biparental embryos, highlights the paternal contributions to zygote genome activation. LARGE SCALE DATA All raw sequencing data are available through the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accessions number: GSE216501. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Extrapolation of biological events from uniparental constructs to biparental embryos should be done with caution. Maternal and paternal genomes do not act independently of each other in a natural condition. The absence of one genome may affect gene transcription of the other. In this sense, the haploid condition of the bioconstructs could mask the transcriptomic patterns of the single cells. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The results obtained demonstrated the level of involvement of the human paternal haploid genome in the early stages of embryo development as well as its evolution at the transcriptomic level, laying the groundwork for the use of these bioconstructs as reliable models to dispel doubts about the genetic role played by the paternal genome in the early cycles of embryo development. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the project 'PI22/00924', co-funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); 'A way to make Europe'. F.D. was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the Miguel Servet program (CPII018/00002). M.J.E. was supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI19/00577 [M.J.E.]) and FI20/00086. P.dC. was supported by a predoctoral grant for training in research into health (PFIS PI19/00577) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. All authors declare having no conflict of interest with regard to this trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Vendrell
- Reproductive Genetics Department, Sistemas Genómicos-Synlab, Valencia, Spain
| | - P de Castro
- Research Department, IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation-Reproductive Biology and Bioengineering in Human Reproduction, IIS La Fe Health Research, Valencia, Spain
| | - L Escrich
- Embryology Department, IVIRMA Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - N Grau
- Embryology Department, IVIRMA Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - R Gonzalez-Martin
- Research Department, IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation-Reproductive Biology and Bioengineering in Human Reproduction, IIS La Fe Health Research, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Quiñonero
- Research Department, IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation-Reproductive Biology and Bioengineering in Human Reproduction, IIS La Fe Health Research, Valencia, Spain
| | - M J Escribá
- Research Department, IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation-Reproductive Biology and Bioengineering in Human Reproduction, IIS La Fe Health Research, Valencia, Spain
- Embryology Department, IVIRMA Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - F Domínguez
- Research Department, IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation-Reproductive Biology and Bioengineering in Human Reproduction, IIS La Fe Health Research, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vendrell X, Escribà MJ. The model of "genetic compartments": a new insight into reproductive genetics. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:363-369. [PMID: 30421342 PMCID: PMC6439105 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1366-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, we are witnessing revolutionary advances in the analytical power of genetic tools. An enormous quantity of data can now be obtained from samples; however, the translation of genetic findings to the general status of individuals, or their offspring, should be done with caution. This is especially relevant in the reproductive context, where the concepts of "transmission" and "inheritability" of a trait are crucial. Against this background, we offer new insight based on a systemic view of genetic constitution in the compartmentalized organism, that is, the human body. This model considers the coexistence of "different" genomes in the same individual and the repercussion of this on reproductive efficacy and offspring. Herein, we review the major differences between somatic, germinal, embryonic, and fetal/placental genomes and their contribution to the next generation and its reproductive efficacy. The major novelty of our approach is the holistic interaction between microsystems within a macrosystem (i.e., the reproductive system). This panoramic model allows us to sketch the future implications of genetic results in function of the origin (compartment) of the sample: peripheral blood or other somatic tissues, gametes, zygotes, preimplantation embryos, fetus, or placenta. We believe this perspective can be of great use in the context of reproductive genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Vendrell
- Reproductive Genetics Unit, Sistemas Genómicos, Parc Tecnològic de Paterna, G. Marconi 6, 46980, València, Spain.
| | - M J Escribà
- IVF Laboratory, IVIRMA-Valencia, Plaça de la Policia Local, 3, 46015, València, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kakourou G, Kahraman S, Ekmekci GC, Tac HA, Kourlaba G, Kourkouni E, Sanz AC, Martin J, Malmgren H, Giménez C, Gold V, Carvalho F, Billi C, Chow JFC, Vendrell X, Kokkali G, Liss J, Steffann J, Traeger-Synodinos J. The clinical utility of PGD with HLA matching: a collaborative multi-centre ESHRE study. Hum Reprod 2019; 33:520-530. [PMID: 29432583 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Has PGD-HLA been successful relative to diagnostic and clinical efficacy? SUMMARY ANSWER The diagnostic efficacy of PGD-HLA protocols was found lower in this study in comparison to published PGD-HLA protocols and to that reported for general PGD by ESHRE (78.5 vs 94.1% and vs 92.6%, respectively), while the clinical efficacy has proven very difficult to assess due to inadequate follow-up of both the ART/PGD and HSCT procedure outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The first clinical cases for PGD-HLA were reported in 2001. It is now a well-established procedure, with an increasing number of cycles performed every year. However, PGD-HLA is still offered by relatively few PGD centres, the currently available data is fragmented and most reports on PGD-HLA applications are limited in number and scope. Published systematic details on methodology, diagnostic results, overall ART success and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcomes are limited, precluding an evaluation of the true clinical utility of PGD-HLA cycles. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective multi-centre cohort study aimed to investigate the diagnostic and clinical efficacy of the PGD-HLA procedure and the aspects of PGD-HLA cycles influencing positive outcomes: birth of genetically suitable donor-baby (or babies) and HSCT. In April 2014, 32 PGD centres (Consortium members and non-members) with published/known PGD-HLA activity were invited to participate. Between February and September 2015, 14 centres submitted their data, through a custom-designed secure database, with unique login access for each centre. Data parameters covered all aspects of PGD-HLA cycles (ART, embryology and genetic diagnosis), donor-babies born and HSCT. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS From 716 cycles submitted by 14 centres (performed between August 2001 and September 2015), the quality evaluation excluded 12 cycles, leaving 704, from 364 couples. The online database, based on REDCap, a free, secure, web-based data-capture application, was customized by Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), Athens. Continuous variables are presented using mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range, and categorical variables are presented as absolute and relative frequencies. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The data included 704 HLA-PGD cycles. Mean maternal age was 33.5 years. Most couples (81.3%) requested HLA-typing with concurrent exclusion of a single monogenic disease (58.6% for beta-thalassaemia). In 92.5% couples, both partners were fertile, with an average 1.93 HLA-PGD cycles/couple. Overall, 9751 oocytes were retrieved (13.9/cycle) and 5532 embryos were analysed (7.9/cycle). Most cycles involved fresh oocytes (94.9%) and Day 3 embryo biopsy (85.3%). In 97.5% of cycles, the genotyping method involved PCR only. Of 4343 embryos diagnosed (78.5% of analysed embryos), 677 were genetically suitable (15.4% of those analysed for HLA alone, 11.6% of those analysed for HLA with exclusion of monogenic disease). Of the 364 couples, 56.6% achieved an embryo transfer (ET) and 598 embryos were transferred in 382 cycles, leading to 164 HCG-positive pregnancies (pregnancy rate/ET 41.3%, pregnancy rate/initiated cycle 23.3%) and 136 babies born (live birth rate/ET 34.3%, live birth rate/initiated cycle 19.3%) to 113 couples. Data analysis identified the following limitations to the overall success of the HLA-PGD procedure: the age of the mother undergoing the treatment cycle, the number of oocytes collected per cycle and genetic chance. HSCT was reported for 57 cases, of which 64.9% involved combined umbilical cord-blood and bone marrow transplantation from the HLA-identical sibling donor; 77.3% of transplants reported no complications. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The findings of the study may be limited as not all PGD centres with PGD-HLA experience participated. Reporting bias on completion of the online database may be another potential limitation. Furthermore, the study is based on retrospective data collection from centres with variable practices and strategies for ART, embryology and genetic diagnosis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This is the first multi-centre study evaluating the clinical utility of PGD-HLA, indicating variations in practice and outcomes throughout 15 years and between centres. The study highlights parameters important for positive outcomes and provides important information for both scientists and couples interested in initiating a cycle. Above all, the study underlines the need for better collaboration between all specialists involved in the ART-PGD/HLA procedure, as well as the need for comprehensive and prospective long-term data collection, and encourages all specialists to aim to properly evaluate and follow-up all procedures, with the ultimate aim to promote best practice and encourage patient informed decision making. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study wishes to acknowledge ESHRE for funding the customization of the REDCap database. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Kakourou
- Department of Medical Genetics, Choremio Research Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Thivon & Livadias, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - S Kahraman
- Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Unit, Piyale Pasa Bulvari, 34385 Okmeydani sisli-Instanbul, Turkey
| | - G C Ekmekci
- Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Unit, Piyale Pasa Bulvari, 34385 Okmeydani sisli-Instanbul, Turkey
| | - H A Tac
- Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Unit, Piyale Pasa Bulvari, 34385 Okmeydani sisli-Instanbul, Turkey
| | - G Kourlaba
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 5 Chatzigianni Mexi 11528, Athens, Greece
| | - E Kourkouni
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 5 Chatzigianni Mexi 11528, Athens, Greece
| | - A Cervero Sanz
- Igenomix, Parc Científic Universitat de Valéncia, Calle Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, 46980 Paterna (València), Spain
| | - J Martin
- Igenomix, Parc Científic Universitat de Valéncia, Calle Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, 46980 Paterna (València), Spain
| | - H Malmgren
- Stockholm PGD Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Karolinska vägen, 171 76 Solna, Sweden
| | - C Giménez
- Reprogenetics Spain, Carrer de Tuset, 23, 08006 Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Gold
- PGD Lab, Lis Fertility Institute, Lis Maternity and Women's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - F Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, R. Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - C Billi
- Preimplantation Diagnosis Department, Alfalab Private Diagnostic Laboratory Medical S.A., Anastasiou Georgiou 11, 115 24 Athens, Greece
| | - J F C Chow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Tsan Yuk Hospital Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Laboratory, Tsan Yuk Hospital, 30 Hospital Road, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong
| | - X Vendrell
- Reproductive Genetics Unit, Sistemas Genómicos Ltd, Ronda G.Marconi 6, 46980 Paterna (València), Spain
| | - G Kokkali
- Genesis Athens Clinic, Reproductive Medicine Unit, 14 Papanikoli Str, Chalandri 15232, Athens, Greece
| | - J Liss
- Invicta Fertility and Reproductive Center, 10 Rajska St., 80-850 Gdansk, Poland
| | - J Steffann
- Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut Imagine, INSERM UMR1163, Laboratoire de Génétique, APHP Hopital Necker-Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sévres, 75743 PARIS CEDEX 15, Paris, France
| | - J Traeger-Synodinos
- Department of Medical Genetics, Choremio Research Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Thivon & Livadias, Athens 11527, Greece
| |
Collapse
|