Longitudinal profiling of human androgenotes through single-cell analysis unveils paternal gene expression dynamics in early embryo development

STUDY QUESTION

How do transcriptomics vary in haploid human androgenote embryos at single cell level in the first four cell cycles of embryo development?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Gene expression peaks at the fourth cell cycle, however some androcytes exhibit unique transcriptional behaviors.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The developmental potential of an embryo is determined by the competence of the oocyte and the sperm. However, studies of the contribution of the paternal genome using pure haploid androgenotes are very scarce.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study was performed analyzing the single-cell transcriptomic sequencing of 38 androcytes obtained from 10 androgenote bioconstructs previously produced in vitro (de Castro et al., 2023). These results were analyzed through different bioinformatics software such as g: Profiler, GSEA, Cytoscape, and Reactome.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Single cell sequencing was used to obtain the transcriptomic profiles of the different androcytes. The results obtained were compared between the different cycles studied using the DESeq2 program and functional enrichment pathways using g: Profiler, Cytoscape, and Reactome.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A wave of paternally driven transcriptomic activation was found during the third-cell cycle, with 1128 upregulated and 225 downregulated genes and the fourth-cell cycle, with 1373 upregulated and 286 downregulated genes, compared to first-cell cycle androcytes. Differentially expressed routes related to cell differentiation, DNA-binding transcription, RNA biosynthesis and RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory complex, and cell death were found in the third and fourth with respect to the first-cell cycle. Conversely, in the fourth cell cycle, 153 downregulated and 332 upregulated genes were found compared with third cell cycle, associated with differentially expressed processes related to E-box binding and zinc finger protein 652 (ZNF652) transcription factor. Further, significant overexpression of LEUTX, PRAMEF1, DUXA, RFPL4A, TRIM43, and ZNF675 found in androgenotes, compared to biparental embryos, highlights the paternal contributions to zygote genome activation.

LARGE SCALE DATA

All raw sequencing data are available through the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accessions number: GSE216501.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Extrapolation of biological events from uniparental constructs to biparental embryos should be done with caution. Maternal and paternal genomes do not act independently of each other in a natural condition. The absence of one genome may affect gene transcription of the other. In this sense, the haploid condition of the bioconstructs could mask the transcriptomic patterns of the single cells.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The results obtained demonstrated the level of involvement of the human paternal haploid genome in the early stages of embryo development as well as its evolution at the transcriptomic level, laying the groundwork for the use of these bioconstructs as reliable models to dispel doubts about the genetic role played by the paternal genome in the early cycles of embryo development.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the project 'PI22/00924', co-funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); 'A way to make Europe'. F.D. was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the Miguel Servet program (CPII018/00002). M.J.E. was supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI19/00577 [M.J.E.]) and FI20/00086. P.dC. was supported by a predoctoral grant for training in research into health (PFIS PI19/00577) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. All authors declare having no conflict of interest with regard to this trial.

Mitochondrial Inheritance in Phytopathogenic Fungi-Everything Is Known, or Is It?

Mitochondria are important organelles in eukaryotes that provide energy for cellular processes. Their function is highly conserved and depends on the expression of nuclear encoded genes and genes encoded in the organellar genome. Mitochondrial DNA replication is independent of the replication control of nuclear DNA and as such, mitochondria may behave as selfish elements, so they need to be controlled, maintained and reliably inherited to progeny. Phytopathogenic fungi meet with special environmental challenges within the plant host that might depend on and influence mitochondrial functions and services. We find that this topic is basically unexplored in the literature, so this review largely depends on work published in other systems. In trying to answer elemental questions on mitochondrial functioning, we aim to introduce the aspect of mitochondrial functions and services to the study of plant-microbe-interactions and stimulate phytopathologists to consider research on this important organelle in their future projects.

In vivo and in vitro differentiation of uniparental embryonic stem cells into hematopoietic and neural cell types

The biological role of genomic imprinting in adult tissue is central to the consideration of transplanting uniparental embryonic stem (ES) cell-derived tissues. We have recently shown that both maternal (parthenogenetic/gynogenetic) and paternal (androgenetic) uniparental ES cells can differentiate, both in vivo in chimeras and in vitro, into adult-repopulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. This suggests that, at least in some tissues, the presence of two maternal or two paternal genomes does not interfere with stem cell function and tissue homeostasis in the adult. Here, we consider implications of the contribution of uniparental cells to hematopoiesis and to development of other organ systems, notably neural tissue for which consequences of genomic imprinting are associated with a known bias in development and behavioral disorders. Our findings so far indicate that there is little or no limit to the differentiation potential of uniparental ES cells outside the normal developmental paradigm. As a potentially donor MHC-matching source of tissue, uniparental transplants may provide not only a clinical resource but also a unique tool to investigate aspects of genomic imprinting in adults.