1
|
Controlling the release rate of topotecan from PLGA spheres and increasing its cytotoxicity towards glioblastoma cells by co-loading with calcium chloride. Int J Pharm 2021; 602:120616. [PMID: 33892056 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
It has been suggested that local administration of topotecan (TT) could increase its efficacy in the treatment of glioblastoma. In this context, a PLGA implant model in the form of spheres with a porous core and stiff surface, loaded with TT and CaCl2 was developed. An array of formulations differing from each other by the type of PLGA used, the integrity of the surface, the concentrations of TT and CaCl2 added during the preparation, and the volume of water in the PLGA mix, was prepared, screened and explored by computerized multifactorial analysis. This analysis enabled the simultaneous identification of the most influential experimental factors on the experimental responses, which were pre-determined as the efficiency of TT loading and the TT % cumulative release at 14 days. The multifactorial analysis also revealed how the interactions among the experimental factors affect the performance of the various formulations. Thus, TT concentration and its factorial interaction with the concentration of CaCl2 added during the spheres' preparation were identified as most prominent on the loading efficiency, while the surface integrity (intact or punctured) and CaCl2 amount in the spheres were identified as most prominent on the TT % cumulative release from the spheres. TT was found to be cytotoxic towards glioblastoma U87 MG cells, an activity which was enhanced, synergistically, in the presence of CaCl2 (the relative viability was reduced from 36 to 28% with combination indices of 1.0, 0.37, 0.13 and 0.06 for EC50, EC75, EC90 and EC95, respectively). Interestingly, dividing the TT dose into 3 equal portions, replenished daily to the incubation medium, increased TT cytotoxicity. The relative viability was then reduced from 35 to 7% and in the presence of CaCl2 - from 28 to 1.9%, suggesting that a local, slow input of TT could be effective in the treatment of glioblastoma by an adjacent TT implant. The increased effect of CaCl2 on cytotoxicity was also observed when it was co-loaded into the TT spheres. In that case, the cells' viability was reduced from 72 to 27%. It is suggested that the PLGA spheres could be used for tunable local delivery of TT in post-resection adjuvant therapy of glioblastoma.
Collapse
|
2
|
Senbabaoglu F, Aksu AC, Cingoz A, Seker-Polat F, Borklu-Yucel E, Solaroglu İ, Bagci-Onder T. Drug Repositioning Screen on a New Primary Cell Line Identifies Potent Therapeutics for Glioblastoma. Front Neurosci 2021; 14:578316. [PMID: 33390879 PMCID: PMC7773901 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.578316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a malignant brain cancer with limited treatment options and high mortality rate. While established glioblastoma cell line models provide valuable information, they ultimately lose most primary characteristics of tumors under long-term serum culture conditions. Therefore, established cell lines do not necessarily recapitulate genetic and morphological characteristics of real tumors. In this study, in line with the growing interest in using primary cell line models derived from patient tissue, we generated a primary glioblastoma cell line, KUGBM8 and characterized its genetic alterations, long term growth ability, tumor formation capacity and its response to Temozolomide, the front-line chemotherapy utilized clinically. In addition, we performed a drug repurposing screen on the KUGBM8 cell line to identify FDA-approved agents that can be incorporated into glioblastoma treatment regimen and identified Topotecan as a lead drug among 1,200 drugs. We showed Topotecan can induce cell death in KUGBM8 and other primary cell lines and cooperate with Temozolomide in low dosage combinations. Together, our study provides a new primary cell line model that can be suitable for both in vitro and in vivo studies and suggests that Topotecan can offer promise as a therapeutic approach for glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filiz Senbabaoglu
- Brain Cancer Research and Therapy Laboratory, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.,Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Cenk Aksu
- Brain Cancer Research and Therapy Laboratory, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.,Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Cingoz
- Brain Cancer Research and Therapy Laboratory, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.,Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fidan Seker-Polat
- Brain Cancer Research and Therapy Laboratory, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.,Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Esra Borklu-Yucel
- Medical Genetics Department and Diagnostic Center for Genetic Diseases, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - İhsan Solaroglu
- Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, United States
| | - Tugba Bagci-Onder
- Brain Cancer Research and Therapy Laboratory, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.,Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Convection Enhanced Delivery of Topotecan for Gliomas: A Single-Center Experience. Pharmaceutics 2020; 13:pharmaceutics13010039. [PMID: 33396668 PMCID: PMC7823846 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13010039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
A key limitation to glioma treatment involves the blood brain barrier (BBB). Convection enhanced delivery (CED) is a technique that uses a catheter placed directly into the brain parenchyma to infuse treatments using a pressure gradient. In this manuscript, we describe the physical principles behind CED along with the common pitfalls and methods for optimizing convection. Finally, we highlight our institutional experience using topotecan CED for the treatment of malignant glioma.
Collapse
|
4
|
Skaga E, Kulesskiy E, Fayzullin A, Sandberg CJ, Potdar S, Kyttälä A, Langmoen IA, Laakso A, Gaál-Paavola E, Perola M, Wennerberg K, Vik-Mo EO. Intertumoral heterogeneity in patient-specific drug sensitivities in treatment-naïve glioblastoma. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:628. [PMID: 31238897 PMCID: PMC6593575 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5861-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A major barrier to effective treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) is the large intertumoral heterogeneity at the genetic and cellular level. In early phase clinical trials, patient heterogeneity in response to therapy is commonly observed; however, how tumor heterogeneity is reflected in individual drug sensitivities in the treatment-naïve glioblastoma stem cells (GSC) is unclear. Methods We cultured 12 patient-derived primary GBMs as tumorspheres and validated tumor stem cell properties by functional assays. Using automated high-throughput screening (HTS), we evaluated sensitivity to 461 anticancer drugs in a collection covering most FDA-approved anticancer drugs and investigational compounds with a broad range of molecular targets. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and Spearman correlation. Results Although tumor stem cell properties were confirmed in GSC cultures, their in vitro and in vivo morphology and behavior displayed considerable tumor-to-tumor variability. Drug screening revealed significant differences in the sensitivity to anticancer drugs (p < 0.0001). The patient-specific vulnerabilities to anticancer drugs displayed a heterogeneous pattern. They represented a variety of mechanistic drug classes, including apoptotic modulators, conventional chemotherapies, and inhibitors of histone deacetylases, heat shock proteins, proteasomes and different kinases. However, the individual GSC cultures displayed high biological consistency in drug sensitivity patterns within a class of drugs. An independent laboratory confirmed individual drug responses. Conclusions This study demonstrates that patient-derived and treatment-naïve GSC cultures maintain patient-specific traits and display intertumoral heterogeneity in drug sensitivity to anticancer drugs. The heterogeneity in patient-specific drug responses highlights the difficulty in applying targeted treatment strategies at the population level to GBM patients. However, HTS can be applied to uncover patient-specific drug sensitivities for functional precision medicine. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5861-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erlend Skaga
- Vilhelm Magnus Laboratory for Neurosurgical Research, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. .,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1112 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Evgeny Kulesskiy
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, University of Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Artem Fayzullin
- Vilhelm Magnus Laboratory for Neurosurgical Research, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1112 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie J Sandberg
- Vilhelm Magnus Laboratory for Neurosurgical Research, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Swapnil Potdar
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, University of Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aija Kyttälä
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Genomics and Biomarkers Unit, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Iver A Langmoen
- Vilhelm Magnus Laboratory for Neurosurgical Research, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1112 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway
| | - Aki Laakso
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki, Topeliuksenkatu 5, 00260, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Emília Gaál-Paavola
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki, Topeliuksenkatu 5, 00260, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Markus Perola
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, University of Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.,National Institute for Health and Welfare, Genomics and Biomarkers Unit, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Krister Wennerberg
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, University of Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Einar O Vik-Mo
- Vilhelm Magnus Laboratory for Neurosurgical Research, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1112 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bernstock JD, Ye D, Gessler FA, Lee YJ, Peruzzotti-Jametti L, Baumgarten P, Johnson KR, Maric D, Yang W, Kögel D, Pluchino S, Hallenbeck JM. Topotecan is a potent inhibitor of SUMOylation in glioblastoma multiforme and alters both cellular replication and metabolic programming. Sci Rep 2017; 7:7425. [PMID: 28785061 PMCID: PMC5547153 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07631-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Protein SUMOylation is a dynamic post-translational modification shown to be involved in a diverse set of physiologic processes throughout the cell. SUMOylation has also been shown to play a role in the pathobiology of myriad cancers, one of which is glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). As such, the clinical significance and therapeutic utility offered via the selective control of global SUMOylation is readily apparent. There are, however, relatively few known/effective inhibitors of global SUMO-conjugation. Herein we describe the identification of topotecan as a novel inhibitor of global SUMOylation. We also provide evidence that inhibition of SUMOylation by topotecan is associated with reduced levels of CDK6 and HIF-1α, as well as pronounced changes in cell cycle progression and cellular metabolism, thereby highlighting its putative role as an adjuvant therapy in defined GBM patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Bernstock
- Stroke Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. .,Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Daniel Ye
- Stroke Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Florian A Gessler
- Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Yang-Ja Lee
- Stroke Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Luca Peruzzotti-Jametti
- Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter Baumgarten
- Edinger Institute, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Kory R Johnson
- Bioinformatics Section, Information Technology & Bioinformatics Program, Division of Intramural Research (DIR), (NINDS/NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dragan Maric
- Flow Cytometry Core Facility, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health (NINDS/NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Wei Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Donat Kögel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefano Pluchino
- Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - John M Hallenbeck
- Stroke Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liao HF, Lee CC, Hsiao PC, Chen YF, Tseng CH, Tzeng CC, Chen YL, Chen JC, Chang YS, Chang JG. TCH1036, a indeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivative, potentially inhibited the growth of human brain malignant glioma (GBM) 8401 cells via suppression of the expression of Suv39h1 and PARP. Biomed Pharmacother 2016; 82:649-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2016] [Revised: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
|
7
|
Eyvazzadeh N, Neshasteh-Riz A, Mahdavi SR, Mohsenifar A. Genotoxic Damage to Glioblastoma Cells Treated with 6 MV X-Radiation in The Presence or Absence of Methoxy Estradiol, IUDR or Topotecan. CELL JOURNAL 2015. [PMID: 26199910 PMCID: PMC4503845 DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2016.3738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective To explore the cumulative genotoxic damage to glioblastoma (GBM) cells,
grown as multicellular spheroids, following exposure to 6 MV X-rays (2 Gy, 22 Gy) with or
without, 2- methoxy estradiol (2ME2), iododeoxyuridine (IUDR) or topotecan (TPT), using
the Picogreen assay.
Materials and Methods The U87MG cells cultured as spheroids were treated with 6
MV X-ray using linear accelerator. Specimens were divided into five groups and irradiated using X-ray giving the dose of 2 Gy after sequentially incubated with one of
the following three drug combinations: TPT, 2-ME2/TPT, IUDR/TPT or 2ME2/IUDR/
TPT. One specimen was used as the irradiated only sample (R). The last group was
also irradiated with total dose of 22 Gy (each time 2 Gy) of 6 MV X-ray in 11 fractions
and treated for three times. DNA damage was evaluated using the Picogreen method
in the experimental study.
Results R/TPT treated group had more DNA damage [double strand break (DSB)/single strand break (SSB)] compared with the untreated group (P<0.05). Moreover the R/
TPT group treated with 2ME2 followed by IUDR had maximum DNA damage in spheroid
GBM indicating an augmented genotoxicity in the cells. The DNA damage was induced
after seven fractionated irradiation and two sequential treatments with 2ME2/IUDR/TPT.
To ensure accuracy of the slope of dose response curve the fractionated radiation was
calculated as 7.36 Gy with respect to α/β ratio based on biologically effective dose (BED)
formulae.
Conclusion Cells treated with 2ME2/IUDR showed more sensitivity to radiation and
accumulative DNA damage. DNA damage was significantly increased when GBM
cells treated with TPT ceased at S phase due to the inhibition of topoisomerase
enzyme and phosphorylation of Chk1 enzyme. These results suggest that R/TPT-
treated cells increase sensitivity to 2ME2 and IUDR especially when they are used
together. Therefore, due to an increase in the level of DNA damage (SSB vs. DSB)
and impairment of DNA repair machinery, more cell death will occur. This in turn may
improve the treatment of GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazila Eyvazzadeh
- Radiation Research Center, Faculty of Paramedicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Neshasteh-Riz
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Rabee Mahdavi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sabbatino F, Fusciello C, Somma D, Pacelli R, Poudel R, Pepin D, Leonardi A, Carlomagno C, Della Vittoria Scarpati G, Ferrone S, Pepe S. Effect of p53 activity on the sensitivity of human glioblastoma cells to PARP-1 inhibitor in combination with topoisomerase I inhibitor or radiation. Cytometry A 2014; 85:953-61. [PMID: 25182801 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2014] [Revised: 08/09/2014] [Accepted: 08/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is involved in the DNA repairing system by sensing and signaling the presence of DNA damage. Inhibition of PARP-1 is tested in combination with DNA damaging agents such as topoisomerase I inhibitors or ionizing radiations (RT) for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). Disruption of p53, widely prevalent in GBMs, plays a major role in DNA repairing system. The current study investigates whether p53 activity has an effect on the sensitivity of human GBM cells to PARP-1 inhibitors in combination with topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan (TPT) and/or RT. Human GBM cell lines carrying a different functional status of p53 were treated with PARP-1 inhibitor NU1025, in combination with TPT and/or RT. Cytotoxic effects were examined by analyzing the antiproliferative activity, the cell cycle perturbations, and the DNA damage induced by combined treatments. PARP inhibition enhanced the antiproliferative activity, the cell cycle perturbations and the DNA damage induced by both TPT or RT in GBM cells. These effects were influenced by the p53 activity: cells carrying an active p53 were more sensitive to the combination of PARP inhibitor and RT, while cells carrying an inactive p53 displayed a higher sensitivity to the combination of PARP inhibitor and TPT. Our study suggests that p53 activity influences the differential sensitivity of GBM cells to combined treatments of TPT, RT, and PARP inhibitors. © 2014 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Sabbatino
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, Naples, Italy, 80131; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|