1
|
Dongpo S, Xiaozhuo L, Xin L, Zhengyao Z, Qing W, Fameng Z, Mingming F, Qian H, Mei L, Tong C. Effectiveness and Safety of Different Postoperative Adjuvant Regimens in Patients with Low-Grade Gliomas: A Network Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2023; 179:e474-e491. [PMID: 37673325 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of various adjuvant regimens in patients with low-grade gliomas and to further explore the optimal adjuvant treatment for patients with low-grade gliomas and the differences in the efficacy of each treatment regimens in different tumor types. METHODS A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to screen randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials related to adjuvant therapy in patients with low-grade gliomas. The Cochrane quality assessment method and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the quality of the included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, respectively. The data from previous studies were extracted using Excel and GetData Graph Digitizer 2.26 software, and network meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16.0 statistical software. RESULTS The specific ranking of 5-year progression-free survival (5-year PFS) for each treatment regimen from the best to the worst in patients with low-grade gliomas was surgery (S) combined with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (S + PCV); surgery combined with standard radiotherapy and PCV multidrug chemotherapy (S + RT + PCV); surgery combined with standard radiotherapy and temozolomide monotherapy (S + RT + TMZ); surgery combined with enhanced radiotherapy (S + H-RT); surgery combined with standard radiotherapy (S + RT); surgery combined with TMZ (S + TMZ); and S. The 5-year overall survival (OS) ranking was S + RT + TMZ, S + RT + PCV, surgery combined with enhanced radiotherapy and TMZ monotherapy (S + H-RT + TMZ), S + H-RT, S + RT, and S. The 2-year progression-free survival ranking was S + RT + TMZ, S + PCV, S + RT, S + RT + PCV, S + TMZ, S + H-RT, and S. The 2-year overall survival ranking was S + RT + TMZ, S + H-RT + TMZ, S + RT, S + RT + PCV, S + H-RT, and S. The incidence of adverse events (≥3) was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: S + RT + PCV, S + RT + TMZ, S + PCV, S + H-RT, S + TMZ, and S + RT. In the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation nonchromosome 1p and 19q chromosome whole arm codeletion (IDHmt/noncoder) group, the S + RT + PCV and S + H-RT regimens had better 5-year PFS and 5-year OS. In the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation and chromosome 1p and 19q chromosome whole arm codeletion (IDHmt/coder) group, the 5-year PFS of each treatment regimen ranked from the best to the worst was S + RT + TMZ, S + RT + PCV, S + H-RT, S + RT, S + TMZ, and S. The order of 5-year OS from the best to the worst was S + H-RT, S + RT + TMZ, S + RT + PCV, S + RT, and S. In the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 wild-type (IDHwt) group, the S + H-RT and S + TMZ regimens had better 5-year PFS. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that both the S + RT + TMZ and S + RT + PCV regimens might be effective therapies for treating patients with low-grade gliomas. Among these, the S + RT + TMZ regimen seemed to be safer but might lead to tumor deterioration. In the IDHmt/coder type, the S + RT + TMZ scheme might have a significant advantage. In the IDHmt/noncoder type, the S + RT + PCV scheme might be more dominant, while in the IDHwt type, the S + H-RT and S + TMZ schemes also might be good treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Dongpo
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China; School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Liu Xiaozhuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Li Xin
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Zuo Zhengyao
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Wang Qing
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Zhen Fameng
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Fan Mingming
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Han Qian
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Li Mei
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Chen Tong
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Halasz LM, Attia A, Bradfield L, Brat DJ, Kirkpatrick JP, Laack NN, Lalani N, Lebow ES, Liu AK, Niemeier HM, Palmer JD, Peters KB, Sheehan J, Thomas RP, Vora SA, Wahl DR, Weiss SE, Yeboa DN, Zhong J, Shih HA. Radiation Therapy for IDH-Mutant Grade 2 and Grade 3 Diffuse Glioma: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:370-386. [PMID: 35902341 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for adults with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma, as classified in the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours. It includes indications for radiation therapy (RT), advanced RT techniques, and clinical management of adverse effects. METHODS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a multidisciplinary task force to address 4 key questions focused on the RT management of patients with IDH-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS A strong recommendation for close surveillance alone was made for patients with oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, 1p/19q codeleted, WHO grade 2 after gross total resection without high-risk features. For oligodendroglioma, WHO grade 2 with any high-risk features, adjuvant RT was conditionally recommended. However, adjuvant RT was strongly recommended for oligodendroglioma, WHO grade 3. A conditional recommendation for close surveillance alone was made for astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, WHO grade 2 after gross total resection without high-risk features. Adjuvant RT was conditionally recommended for astrocytoma, WHO grade 2, with any high-risk features and strongly recommended for astrocytoma, WHO grade 3. Dose recommendations varied based on histology and grade. Given known adverse long-term effects of RT, consideration for advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy/volumetric modulated arc therapy or proton therapy were given as strong and conditional recommendations, respectively. Finally, based on expert opinion, the guideline recommends assessment, surveillance, and management for toxicity management. CONCLUSIONS Based on published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed recommendations to inform the management of adults with IDH-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma as defined by WHO 2021 classification, based on the highest quality published data, and best translated by our task force of subject matter experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Albert Attia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bon Secours Mercy Health, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Daniel J Brat
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nafisha Lalani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Emily S Lebow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Arthur K Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UC Health, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | | | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Reena P Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Sujay A Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Daniel R Wahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Stephanie E Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - D Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD-Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jim Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Owens MR, Nguyen S, Karsy M. Utility of Administrative Databases and Big Data on Understanding Glioma Treatment—A Systematic Review. INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background Gliomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors where large multicenter clinical and genetic studies have become increasingly popular in their understanding. We reviewed and analyzed the findings from large databases in gliomas, seeking to understand clinically relevant information.
Methods A systematic review was performed for gliomas studied using large administrative databases up to January 2020 (e.g., National Inpatient Sample [NIS], National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [NSQIP], and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program [SEER], National Cancer Database [NCDB], and others).
Results Out of 390 screened studies, 122 were analyzed. Studies included a wide range of gliomas including low- and high-grade gliomas. The SEER database (n = 83) was the most used database followed by NCDB (n = 28). The most common pathologies included glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (n = 67), with the next category including mixes of grades II to IV glioma (n = 31). Common study themes involved evaluation of descriptive epidemiological trends, prognostic factors, comparison of different pathologies, and evaluation of outcome trends over time. Persistent health care disparities in patient outcomes were frequently seen depending on race, marital status, insurance status, hospital volume, and location, which did not change over time. Most studies showed improvement in survival because of advances in surgical and adjuvant treatments.
Conclusions This study helps summarize the use of clinical administrative databases in gliomas research, informing on socioeconomic issues, surgical outcomes, and adjuvant treatments over time on a national level. Large databases allow for some study questions that would not be possible with single institution data; however, limitations remain in data curation, analysis, and reporting methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica-Rae Owens
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Utah, United States
| | - Sarah Nguyen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Utah, United States
| | - Michael Karsy
- University of Utah Health Care, University of Utah Health Hospitals and Clinics, Utah, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prabhu RS, Ward MC, Heinzerling JH, Corso CD, Buchwald ZS, Dhakal R, Asher AL, Sumrall AL, Burri SH. The Association Between Radiation Therapy Dose and Overall Survival in Patients With Intracranial Infiltrative Low-Grade Glioma Treated With Concurrent and/or Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100577. [PMID: 33665485 PMCID: PMC7897756 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Previous trials have shown no benefit for radiation therapy (RT) dose escalation when RT is given as adjuvant monotherapy for infiltrative low-grade glioma (LGG). However, the current standard of care for high-risk LGG is RT with concurrent and/or adjuvant chemotherapy. The effect of RT dose escalation on overall survival (OS) in the setting of concurrent and/or adjuvant chemotherapy is not well established. Methods and Materials We used the National Cancer Database to select records for adult patients with intracranial grade 2 LGG diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Patients must have received adjuvant external beam RT with concurrent and/or adjuvant chemotherapy. RT dose level was categorized as standard (45-54 Gy) or high (>54-65 Gy). Multivariable and propensity score matched analyses were used. Results The study cohort consisted of 1043 patients, of whom 644 (62%) received standard dose (median, 54 Gy) and 399 (38%) received high-dose RT (median, 60 Gy). RT dose level was not associated with OS (hazard ratio, 1.2; P = .1) in multivariable analysis. Propensity score matching yielded 380 matched pairs (n = 760). There was no difference in OS for high-dose versus standard-dose RT in the matched cohort (5-year OS 64% vs 69%; P = .14) or in the 2 prespecified subgroups of astrocytoma histology and 1p/19q noncodeleted. Conclusions Adjuvant RT dose escalation above 54 Gy in the setting of concurrent and/or adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved OS for patients with infiltrative LGG in this National Cancer Database retrospective study. This was also true for the subgroups with less chemotherapy-sensitive disease, including astrocytoma histology and 1p/19q noncodeleted, although these analyses were limited by small size. Methods to improve OS other than RT dose escalation in the setting of concurrent and/or adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for patients with poor-prognosis LGG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshan S. Prabhu
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Corresponding author: Roshan S. Prabhu, MD, MS
| | - Matthew C. Ward
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - John H. Heinzerling
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Christopher D. Corso
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | - Reshika Dhakal
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Anthony L. Asher
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | - Stuart H. Burri
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haque W, Thong E, Andrabi S, Verma V, Brian Butler E, Teh BS. Prognostic and predictive impact of MGMT promoter methylation in grade 3 gliomas. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 85:115-121. [PMID: 33581781 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Grade 3 gliomas are aggressive primary brain tumors. Promoter methylation of methyl guanine methyl transferase (MGMT) has been associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with glioblastoma, but the impact of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with grade 3 gliomas is less clear. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the utilization of MGMT testing in patients with Grade 3 glioma, as well its prognostic and predictive value. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried (2004-2016) for patients with newly diagnosed grade 3 glioma without 1p19q codeletion. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis, along with Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS Of 20,488 total patients, 1,209 (5.0%) had MGMT testing. Of these patients, 561 (46.4%) were MGMT methylated (mMGMT), and 648 (53.6%) were MGMT unmethylated (uMGMT). mMGMT patients experienced greater median overall survival (OS) than both uMGMT patients as well as patients with no MGMT status reported (p < 0.05 for both). mMGMT was associated with improved OS for patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiation or adjuvant radiation, but not for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or no adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest study to date describing the utilization of and outcomes for mMGMT patients with grade 3 glioma. The present results demonstrate that mMGMT is a prognostic factor and possibly a predictive biomarker, and is currently under-utilized within the US. MGMT methylation status could be used to risk-stratify and select patients for treatment intensification. IMPORTANCE OF STUDY The present study is the largest of its kind to examine the prognostic and predictive impact of MGMT methylation (mMGMT) amongst patients with Grade 3 Glioma. The results suggest that mMGMT is prognostic, as amongst all patients, mMGMT was associated with improved overall survival. These results also suggest that mMGMT is predictive, as patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation or adjuvant radiation therapy did have improved overall survival with mMGMT, though there was no difference in overall survival observes amongst patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or those patients receiving no adjuvant treatment. The study also found that only 5% of patients nationwide with Grade 3 Glioma are tested for MGMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Elaine Thong
- Department of Psychology, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA
| | - Sara Andrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prabhu RS, Corso CD, Ward MC, Heinzerling JH, Dhakal R, Buchwald ZS, Patel KR, Asher AL, Sumrall AL, Burri SH. The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival in adults with intracranial ependymoma. Neurooncol Pract 2020; 7:391-399. [PMID: 32765890 PMCID: PMC7393282 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adult intracranial ependymoma is rare, and the role for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is not well defined. METHODS We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to select adults (age ≥ 22 years) with grade 2 to 3 intracranial ependymoma status postresection between 2004 and 2015 and treated with adjuvant RT vs observation. Four cohorts were generated: (1) all patients, (2) grade 2 only, (3) grade 2 status post-subtotal resection only, (4) and grade 3 only. The association between adjuvant RT use and overall survival (OS) was assessed using multivariate Cox and propensity score matched analyses. RESULTS A total of 1787 patients were included in cohort 1, of which 856 patients (48%) received adjuvant RT and 931 (52%) were observed. Approximately two-thirds of tumors were supratentorial and 80% were grade 2. Cohorts 2, 3, and 4 included 1471, 345, and 316 patients, respectively. There was no significant association between adjuvant RT use and OS in multivariate or propensity score matched analysis in any of the cohorts. Older age, male sex, urban location, higher comorbidity score, earlier year of diagnosis, and grade 3 were associated with increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS This large NCDB study did not demonstrate a significant association between adjuvant RT use and OS for adults with intracranial ependymoma, including for patients with grade 2 ependymoma status post-subtotal resection. The conflicting results regarding the efficacy of adjuvant RT in this patient population highlight the need for high-quality studies to guide therapy recommendations in adult ependymoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshan S Prabhu
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, NC
| | - Christopher D Corso
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients Not Meeting Age-based Criteria of the CROSS Trial. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 42:67-74. [PMID: 30216194 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The CROSS trial established neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCRT-S) as superior to surgery alone (S) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). However, because patients above 75 years of age were excluded, this comparison cannot be extrapolated to older patients. This study of a large, contemporary national database evaluated practice patterns in elderly patients ineligible for CROSS, and analyzed overall survival (OS) between nCRT+S, S, and definitive CRT (dCRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for EC patients with cT1N1M0/T2-3N0-1M0 EC (per the CROSS trial) but 76 years and above of age. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with nCRT+S (vs. S). Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated OS; Cox multivariate analysis determined variables associated with OS. Propensity matching aimed to address group imbalances and indication biases. RESULTS Of 4099 total patients, 594 (14%) underwent nCRT+S, 494 (12%) underwent S, and 3011 (73%) underwent dCRT. Since 2010, trimodality management has risen, corresponding to declines in S and dCRT. Median OS in the respective groups were 26.7, 20.3, and 17.8 months (P<0.05). Following propensity matching, there was a trend towards higher OS with nCRT-S over S (P=0.077); dCRT showed poorer OS than nCRT-S (P<0.001) but was equivalent to S (P=0.669). Before and following matching, nCRT-S experienced equivalent 30- and 90-day mortality as S (P>0.05), with lower 30-day readmission and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Although most older patients not meeting CROSS criteria undergo dCRT, utilization of trimodality therapy is rising. Despite the trend towards higher OS with trimodality therapy without poorer postoperative outcomes, careful patient selection continues to be essential in this population.
Collapse
|
8
|
Management of Unresectable T4b Esophageal Cancer: Practice Patterns and Outcomes From the National Cancer Data Base. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 42:154-159. [PMID: 30499838 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with unresectable cT4b esophageal cancer (EC) are rare and largely excluded from prospective trials. As a result, current treatment recommendations are based on limited evidence. This study sought to evaluate national practice patterns and outcomes for this population and evaluated 3 primary cohorts: patients receiving chemotherapy (CT) with or without subtherapeutic radiotherapy (RT), definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), or CT with or without RT followed by definitive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for cT4b Nany M0 EC. Exclusion criteria were patients with unspecified staging, palliative treatment, improper, or no histologic confirmation, or lack of CT. Multivariable logistic regression determined factors predictive of receiving surgical therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. RESULTS Altogether, 519 patients met inclusion criteria; 195 (38%) underwent CT, 291 (56%) underwent definitive CRT, and 33 (6%) underwent surgical-based therapy. Surgery was more likely performed in patients residing in rural areas, living farther from the treating facility, and N1 status (P<0.05 for all). Median OS in the respective cohorts were 6.0, 12.7, and 43.9 months (P<0.001). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling, among others, nonsurgical treatment was associated with poorer OS (P<0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS In the largest study to date evaluating patterns of care for cT4b EC, as compared with CT alone, addition of definitive RT was associated with higher OS. Although causation is clearly not implied, well-selected responders to CT and/or RT may be able to undergo resection and numerically prolonged survival, but patient selection remains paramount.
Collapse
|
9
|
McDuff SGR, Dietrich J, Atkins KM, Oh KS, Loeffler JS, Shih HA. Radiation and chemotherapy for high-risk lower grade gliomas: Choosing between temozolomide and PCV. Cancer Med 2019; 9:3-11. [PMID: 31701682 PMCID: PMC6943166 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The majority of patients with high‐risk lower grade gliomas (LGG) are treated with single‐agent temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy despite three randomized trials showing a striking overall survival benefit with adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This article aims to evaluate the evidence and rationale for the widespread use of TMZ instead of PCV for high‐risk LGG. Methods and Materials We conducted a literature search utilizing PubMed for articles investigating the combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high‐risk LGG and analyzed the results of these studies. Results For patients with IDH mutant 1p/19q codeleted LGG tumors, there is limited evidence to support the use of TMZ. In medically fit patients with codeleted disease, existing data demonstrate a large survival benefit for PCV as compared to adjuvant radiation therapy alone. For patients with non‐1p/19q codeleted LGG, early data from the CATNON study supports inclusion of adjuvant TMZ for 12 months. Subset analyses of the RTOG 9402 and EORTC 26951 do not demonstrate a survival benefit for adjuvant PCV for non‐1p/19q codeleted gliomas, however secondary analyses of RTOG 9802 and RTOG 9402 demonstrated survival benefit in any IDH mutant lower grade gliomas, regardless of 1p/19q codeletion status. Conclusions At present, we conclude that current evidence does not support the widespread use of TMZ over PCV for all patients with high‐risk LGG, and we instead recommend tailoring chemotherapy recommendation based on IDH status, favoring adjuvant PCV for patients with any IDH mutant tumors, both those that harbor 1p/19q codeletion and those non‐1p/19q codeleted. Given the critical role radiation plays in the treatment of LGG, radiation oncologists should be actively involved in discussions regarding chemotherapy choice in order to optimize treatment for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan G R McDuff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Medicine Circle, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katelyn M Atkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kevin S Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jay S Loeffler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Polamraju P, Haque W, Cao K, Verma V, Schwartz M, Klimberg VS, Hatch S, Niravath P, Butler EB, Teh BS. Comparison of outcomes between metaplastic and triple-negative breast cancer patients. Breast 2019; 49:8-16. [PMID: 31675684 PMCID: PMC7375639 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare, aggressive variant of breast cancer that has been associated with poor clinical outcomes, as has triple-negative breast (TNBC) cancer. Limited studies compare the clinical characteristics and prognosis of MBC to TNBC. This study uses a large, contemporary US cancer database to compare clinical characteristics and survival outcomes for patients with MBC to those with TNBC. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for women with cT1-4N1-3M0 MBC or TNBC diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 and treated with definitive surgery. Chi-squared analysis was performed to determine differences between the cohorts. Kaplan-Meier curves compared overall survival (OS), and Cox regression determined patient factors associated with OS. Results Altogether, 55,847 patients met the inclusion criteria; 50,705 (90.8%) had TNBC and 5,142 (9.2%) had MBC. Most patients had no comorbid conditions (82%), N0 disease (71%), poorly differentiated histology (77%), received chemotherapy (87%), and received radiation therapy (60%). Amongst all patients, patients with TNBC disease were observed to have greater OS than those with MBC (5-year OS 72.0% vs 55.8%, p < 0.001). The greater observed OS for patients with TNBC persisted when controlling for stage and when comparing propensity score matched cohorts. On Cox regression, lower age, T1 status, N0 status, chemotherapy, TNBC disease, and radiation therapy (RT) were associated with improved OS. Conclusions MBC had an association with poorer OS compared to TNBC, while RT and chemotherapy receipt were associated with improved OS for patients regardless of stage. Further studies are needed to corroborate the conclusions herein. Metaplastic breast cancer is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Metaplastic breast cancer associated with worse survival than patients with triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy associated with improved survival for patients with metaplastic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen Polamraju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Kevin Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mary Schwartz
- Department of Pathology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - V Suzanne Klimberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Sandra Hatch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Polly Niravath
- Department of Medical Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Concurrent Versus Sequential Chemoradiation for Low-grade Gliomas Meeting RTOG 9802 Criteria. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 42:391-398. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
12
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. Trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer at high volume facilities is associated with improved postoperative outcomes and overall survival. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32:5057168. [PMID: 30052835 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Trimodality therapy is the standard of care for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer (EC) but carries morbidity and mortality risks; thus, therapy at high-volume facilities (HVFs) may offer advantages. This investigation studied postoperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) in EC patients receiving trimodality therapy at HVFs versus lower-volume facilities (LVFs). The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with locally advanced EC receiving trimodality therapy. HVFs referred to the 90th percentile of case volume. Multivariate logistic regression determined factors associated with treatment at HVFs, the Kaplan-Meier analysis compared OS between the HVF and LVF groups, and the Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. Sensitivity analysis evaluated the impact of varying the HVF definition cutoff on OS. A total of 3,229 patients met study criteria, including 330 (10%) treated at HVFs and 2,899 (90%) at LVFs. Treatment at HVFs was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (1.2% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.044) and trends toward lower 90-day mortality (4.8% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.055) and the length of postoperative hospitalization (11.2 vs. 12.3d, P = 0.059). HVF patients experienced higher median OS (55 vs. 36 months, P = 0.004), which also independently correlated on the Cox multivariate analysis (P = 0.001). Sensitivity analysis showed similar results as the HVF/LVF cutoff was decreased until the 80th percentile. This is the first study demonstrating that the trimodality management of EC at HVFs is associated with improved postoperative outcomes and survival. These data have implications for multidisciplinary oncologic providers, in addition to patient counseling by both referring and treating clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - V Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - E B Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - B S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lewis GD, Dalwadi SM, Farach A, Brian Butler E, Teh BS. The Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Pleural Mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1879-1885. [PMID: 30798447 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07235-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pleural mesothelioma is a rare but aggressive form of cancer. Local recurrence represents the majority of treatment failures and overall survival (OS) outcomes remain dismal. Adding locoregional treatment with radiotherapy after surgical resection has been considered but its role remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried (2004-2013) for patients with malignant mesothelioma. Patients were divided into three groups: observation, surgery alone, and surgery followed by adjuvant RT. Statistics included Fisher's exact or Chi square tests to analyze categorical proportions between groups, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate OS, and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. Propensity matching was performed to make comparisons between homogenous groups. RESULTS Overall, the surgery plus radiotherapy group had a higher median survival (21.4 months) compared with surgery alone (16.59 months) [p < 0.001]. RT was more likely to be delivered after extrapleural pneumonectomy than with lung-sparing surgical approaches. On multivariable analysis, receipt of surgery plus radiotherapy, chemotherapy administration, and higher socioeconomic status were associated with improved OS (p < 0.0001). After propensity matching, receipt of surgery plus radiotherapy and chemotherapy administration were still associated with improved OS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma, adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical intervention was associated with improved OS. This study is the largest study of adjuvant radiotherapy to date, and our findings highlight the need for additional prospective data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary D Lewis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shraddha M Dalwadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew Farach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sequencing of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma and Oligoastrocytoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 42:258-264. [PMID: 30601146 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adjuvant management of anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (AOs) and anaplastic oligoastrocytomas (AOAs) is guided by 2 seminal phase III trials, one of which utilized radiotherapy (RT) followed by chemotherapy (CT) (RT-CT), and the other in which CT was followed by RT (CT-RT). Both paradigms are endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network because no direct comparison in the first-line (nonprogressive) setting has been performed to date. This study of a contemporary national database sought to evaluate practice patterns and outcomes between both approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for newly diagnosed AO/AOA treated with postoperative sequential CT-RT or RT-CT. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors independently associated with delivery of a particular paradigm. Overall survival (OS) between cohorts was compared using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling evaluated factors associated with OS. RESULTS Of 225 patients, 19 (8.4%) received CT-RT and 206 (91.6%) underwent RT-CT. Groups were well-balanced, although CT-RT was more often administered to men (P=0.009) and AOs (P=0.037). Median follow-up was 58 months. Median OS in the CT-RT cohort was 93 months (95% confidence interval, 37-150 mo), and 107 months (95% confidence interval, 72-142 mo) in the RT-CT group (P=0.709). Therapy sequence was not associated with OS on univariate (P=0.709) or multivariate (P=0.257) assessment. CONCLUSIONS In the United States, most AO/AOA patients receiving sequential therapy undergo RT followed by CT. No differences in survival were observed with either approach; this addresses a knowledge gap and confirms that both paradigms are appropriate in the first-line setting.
Collapse
|
15
|
Postmastectomy radiation therapy for triple negative, node-negative breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 132:48-54. [PMID: 30825969 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) for patients with node-negative, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is controversial. This study of a large, contemporary US database described national practice patterns and addressed the impact of PMRT on survival for patients with node-negative TNBC. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried (2004-2014) for women with non-metastatic TNBC with pT1-4N0M0 disease undergoing mastectomy. Use of PMRT was assessed. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with PMRT use. The Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between patients managed with either PMRT or observation following mastectomy when stratifying by pT stage. Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. RESULTS A total of 14,464 patients met the selection criteria; of these, 1,569 (10.8%) received PMRT, whereas 12,895 (89.2%) did not receive PMRT. Use of PMRT varied significantly with pT stage, with only 5.7% of T1 patients undergoing PMRT, while 51.6% of patients with T3 disease underwent PMRT. Use of PMRT was associated with superior OS for patients with pT3 disease but not for patients with other T stages. Greater age was associated with decreased likelihood of PMRT use, while increased T stage and positive surgical margins were associated with use of PMRT. On multivariate analysis, increased age, T stage, and positive surgical margins were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS In the largest study to date evaluating the use of PMRT in patients with node-negative TNBC, the use of PMRT was low in patients with T1 and T2 disease. Additionally, while an OS benefit was observed with the use of PMRT in patients with T3 disease, there was no benefit with the use of PMRT in other T stage groups. Further prospective studies are recommended to further elucidate the benefit on PMRT in patients with node-negative TNBC.
Collapse
|
16
|
Haque W, Arms A, Verma V, Hatch S, Brian Butler E, Teh BS. Outcomes of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma versus invasive lobular carcinoma. Breast 2018; 43:67-73. [PMID: 30496936 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (PLC) is a rare histologic variant of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) that has been associated with worse clinical outcomes than classic ILC. Owing to its rarity, high-volume studies of its clinical characteristics and prognosis are lacking. The purpose of this study was to use a large, contemporary cancer database to investigate the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes for patients with PLC. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for women with cT1-4N1-3M0 breast cancer with either ILC or PLC histology having received definitive surgical therapy. Chi-squared analysis was performed to determine differences between the cohorts. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between all patients and between patients when stratifying by age and subtype. Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. RESULTS A total of 115,260 patients met the study criteria; of these, 114,859 (99.6%) had ILC, while 401 (0.4%) had PLC. A greater proportion of patients with PLC had T3-4 and node-positive disease, and were more likely to have ER- and HER2+ disease. PLC histology was associated with worse OS on both univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). PLC was associated with poorer OS in subgroups that were T3-4/N+ (but not T1-2N0) disease and ER+ (but not ER-) cancers, but not by HER2 status. CONCLUSIONS Patients with PLC, who were more likely to have ER- and HER2+ disease, experienced worse OS than patients with ILC, which may be limited to patients with more advanced clinical stage and ER + disease. Further work is needed to determine the optimal treatment for this more aggressive form of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Ashley Arms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sandra Hatch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Verma V, Sleightholm RL, Fang P, Ryckman JM, Lin C. National Cancer Database report of nonmetastatic esophageal small cell carcinoma. Cancer Med 2018; 7:6365-6373. [PMID: 30403012 PMCID: PMC6308049 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2018] [Revised: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Esophageal small cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a rare malignancy for which there is no consensus management approach. This is the largest known analysis of nonmetastatic ESCC patients to date, evaluating national practice patterns and outcomes of surgical‐based therapy vs chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs chemotherapy alone. Methods The National Cancer Data Base was queried for esophageal cancer patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic ESCC. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with receipt of surgical‐based management. Kaplan‐Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) and the log‐rank test is used to compare OS between groups; Cox univariate and multivariate analyses determined variables associated with OS. Results Altogether, 323 patients were analyzed; 64 (20%) patients underwent surgical‐based therapy, 211 (65%) CRT, and 48 (15%) chemotherapy alone. On multivariable analysis, no single factor significantly predicted for administration of surgery. Despite no OS differences between the surgery‐based (median OS 21 months) and CRT arms (18 months), both were superior to CT alone (10 months) (P < 0.001). Among other factors, receiving any local therapy independently predicted for higher OS over chemotherapy alone on Cox multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). Conclusions This study of a large, contemporary national database demonstrates that most ESCC is treated with CRT in the United States; adding local therapy to systemic therapy may be beneficial to these patients, although individualized multidisciplinary management is still recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Penny Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey M Ryckman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Chi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Neugut AI, Sackstein P, Hillyer GC, Jacobson JS, Bruce J, Lassman AB, Stieg PA. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Screening for Asymptomatic Brain Tumors: A Review. Oncologist 2018; 24:375-384. [PMID: 30305414 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain tumors comprise 2% of all cancers but are disproportionately responsible for cancer-related deaths. The 5-year survival rate of glioblastoma, the most common form of malignant brain tumor, is only 4.7%, and the overall 5-year survival rate for any brain tumor is 34.4%. In light of the generally poor clinical outcomes associated with these malignancies, there has been interest in the concept of brain tumor screening through magnetic resonance imaging. Here, we will provide a general overview of the screening principles and brain tumor epidemiology, then highlight the major studies examining brain tumor prevalence in asymptomatic populations in order to assess the potential benefits and drawbacks of screening for brain tumors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening in healthy asymptomatic adults can detect both early gliomas and other benign central nervous system abnormalities. Further research is needed to determine whether MRI will improve overall morbidity and mortality for the screened populations and make screening a worthwhile endeavor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfred I Neugut
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
- Department of Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
| | - Paul Sackstein
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
| | - Grace C Hillyer
- Department of Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
| | - Judith S Jacobson
- Department of Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bruce
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
- Department of Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
- Department of Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York New York, USA
| | - Philip A Stieg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Haque W, Verma V, Hatch S, Klimberg VS, Butler EB, Teh BS. Omission of chemotherapy for low-grade, luminal A N1 breast cancer: Patterns of care and clinical outcomes. Breast 2018; 41:67-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
20
|
Straube C, Kessel KA, Schmidt-Graf F, Krieg SM, Meyer B, Gempt J, Combs SE. A trend towards a more intense adjuvant treatment of low-grade-gliomas in tertiary centers in Germany after RTOG 9802 - results from a multi-center survey. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:907. [PMID: 30241469 PMCID: PMC6151028 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4825-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment recommendations for Low-grade Gliomas (LGG) underwent profound changes due to results from RTOG 9802 published in April 2016. This work aims to investigate whether the results from the trial were already incorporated into the treatment recommendations at German oncology centers before an update of the official guidelines. METHODS An online based questionnaire with questions covering all aspects of adjuvant treatments of LGGs was generated, including three cases with distinct clinical situations. We contacted all members of the neuro-oncologic working group (NOA) of the German Cancer Society (DKG) as well as all German-speaking members of the European Low-Grade Glioma Network via E-mail. RESULTS We collected 38 responses. All responders were at least specialists; they predominantly worked at tertiary hospitals with a high volume of LGGs treated annually (75% with more than 10 cases per year). All responders stated to consent treatment recommendation for LGGs within interdisciplinary oncologic boards. The treatment recommendations for LGGs changed profoundly between 2015 and 12/2016. There is a trend towards PCV-based multimodal treatments, especially for oligodendroglial LGGs, as well as a trend away from watchful-waiting-policies for astrocytic LGGs. CONCLUSION Neurooncologists do adapt results from clinical trials quickly. None the less, there is still an immense heterogeneity within the treatment recommendations, predominantly for astrocytic LGGs. Well planned clinical trials and concise treatment recommendations are warranted; additionally, individual counseling of patients is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Straube
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin A. Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Schmidt-Graf
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Sandro M. Krieg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Impact of adjuvant treatments on survival in Korean patients with WHO grade II gliomas: KNOG 15-02 and KROG 16-04 intergroup study. J Neurooncol 2018; 140:445-455. [PMID: 30097825 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2972-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Optimal treatment strategies for low-grade glioma (LGG) remain controversial. We analyzed treatment outcomes and evaluated prognostic factors of adult LGG patients in Korea. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 555 patients diagnosed with WHO grade II LGG (astrocytoma 37.8%, oligoastrocytoma 15.3%, and oligodendroglioma 46.8%) at 14 institutions between 2000 and 2010. Primary and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Propensity-score matching (PSM) analyses were performed to correct imbalances in patient/tumor characteristics among adjuvant treatment groups. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 83.4 months, and the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 52.2% and 83.0%, respectively. Male, older age, poorer performance status, multiple lobe involvement, and astrocytoma histology were associated with poorer survival. Among the treatment factors, gross total resection (GTR) was associated with better PFS and OS, and adjuvant chemotherapy with improved PFS. Interestingly, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) did not improve PFS; rather, it was related with poorer OS. Regarding patient/tumor characteristics, the RT group had poorer characteristics than the non-RT group. After PSM, we detected a tendency for improved PFS in the matched RT group, and no significant difference in OS compared with the matched non-RT group. CONCLUSIONS The achievement of GTR is important to improve survival in LGG patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy may enhance PFS, but adjuvant RT did not improve survival outcomes. After PSM, we observed potential impacts of adjuvant RT on PFS. Our results may reflect real-world practice and consequently may help to optimize treatment strategies for LGG.
Collapse
|
22
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. Trends and disparities in the utilization of hypofractionated neoadjuvant radiation therapy for rectal cancer in the United States. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:601-609. [PMID: 30151256 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.05.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) versus hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) for rectal cancer (RC) is among the most controversial and debatable areas of radiotherapeutic management. This is the only known study evaluating the utilization of neoadjuvant HFRT for RC in the United States, and focuses on trends and health disparities. Methods The National Cancer Data Base was queried [2004-2015] for newly-diagnosed cT3-T4 Nany or cTany N1-2 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant RT, with or without chemotherapy, followed by resection. Following analysis based on temporal trends, multivariate logistic regression determined factors associated with receipt of HFRT. Results Altogether, 29,994 patients met study criteria: 29,724 (99%) were treated with CFRT, and 270 (1%) with HFRT. Temporally, utilization of HFRT rose significantly, from 0.2% in 2004 to 2.0% in 2015, with the steepest slope at most recent time periods. HFRT was more likely administered to older patients, those with more comorbidities, and node-positive disease (P<0.05 for all). There were racial differences, as African-Americans were independently less likely to receive HFRT (P=0.043). The two strongest predictors of HFRT administration (by odds ratio) were time period and therapy at academic centers (P<0.05 for all). Conclusions Although HFRT is underutilized in the US, its use is rising and has increased nearly tenfold over the last decade. Disparities in HFRT delivery are emphasized, especially concerning disease-/patient-specific factors, socioeconomic status, and race. These data may serve as a benchmark for future investigation as well as for health disparities in the radiotherapeutic treatment of RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler E, Teh BS. Utilization of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma Brain Metastases. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 16:e935-e943. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
24
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. Utilization of intensity modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer in the United States. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:466-477. [PMID: 29998012 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.03.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer (AC) can incur substantial treatment-related toxicities. Whereas radiotherapy (RT) for AC has historically been delivered with two- or three-dimensional conformal RT (2D/3DCRT) techniques, intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) is associated with improved target conformality and lower doses to organs-at-risk (OARs). This is the first investigation to date evaluating trends of IMRT utilization in the United States. Methods The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried [2004-2015] for AC patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy with a defined RT technique (3DCRT versus IMRT). Following analysis based on temporal trends, multivariate logistic regression determined factors associated with receipt of IMRT. Secondarily, Kaplan-Meier analysis compared OS between the 3DCRT and IMRT groups, and Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. Results Altogether, 11,396 patients met study criteria; 1,288 (11%) were treated with 3DCRT and 10,108 (89%) with IMRT. Temporally, utilization of IMRT rose significantly, from 28% in 2004 to 96% in 2015, corresponding with a progressive decrease in 3DCRT usage. IMRT was more likely delivered in node-positive disease, at academic centers, and in southern/western regions (P<0.05 for all). T3-4 disease was less likely to receive IMRT (P<0.05). As expected, there were no OS differences based on RT technique (P=0.402). Predictors of worse OS included advancing age, male gender, increasing comorbidities, advanced T-stage, and nodal positivity (P<0.05 for all). In addition to racial- and insurance-related factors, receipt of therapy at academic centers independently predicted for improved OS (P<0.05 for all). Conclusions Based on findings from this large, contemporary dataset, IMRT is now the most widely utilized RT technique for AC, and 3DCRT is used in a very small minority of patients. IMRT utilization is impacted by multiple characteristics, such as disease- and regional-related factors. These observations have implications for payers and insurance coverage; improved survival at academic centers has ramifications for patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ryckman JM, Kusi Appiah A, Simone CB, Verma V. Treatment approaches for nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:995-1001. [PMID: 29338490 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1426878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey M. Ryckman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Adams Kusi Appiah
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Verma V, Kusi Appiah A, Lautenschlaeger T, Adeberg S, Simone CB, Lin C. Chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: practice patterns and outcomes from the national cancer data base. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:527-535. [PMID: 29998018 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.01.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current guidelines recommend chemotherapy (CT) with or without radiotherapy (RT) for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IC). Although there is currently lack of consensus, previous smaller studies have illustrated the efficacy of local therapy for this population. This investigation evaluated outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CT alone in unresected IC using a large, contemporary national database. Methods The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for primary IC cases (2004-2013) receiving CT alone or CRT. Patients undergoing resection or not receiving CT were excluded, as were those with M1 disease or unknown M classification. Logistic regression analysis ascertained factors associated with CRT administration. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between both groups. Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed variables associated with OS. Results In total, 2,842 patients were analyzed [n=666 (23%) CRT, n=2,176 (77%) CT]. CRT was less likely delivered at community centers, in more recent time periods (2009-2013), to older patients, and in certain geographic locations. Median OS in the CRT and CT groups were 13.6 vs. 10.5 months, respectively (P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, poorer OS was associated with age, male gender, increased comorbidities, treatment at a community center, and treatment at earlier time periods (2004-2008) (P<0.05 for all). Notably, receipt of CRT independently predicted for improved OS (P<0.001). Conclusions As compared to CT alone, CRT was independently associated with improved survival in unresected IC. These findings support a randomized trial evaluating this question that is currently accruing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adams Kusi Appiah
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Tim Lautenschlaeger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Haque W, Verma V, Bernicker E, Butler EB, Teh BS. Management of pathologic node-positive disease following initial surgery for clinical T1-2 N0 esophageal cancer: patterns of care and outcomes from the national cancer data base. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:782-789. [PMID: 29188742 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1409435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although clinical T1-2N0 esophageal cancer (EC) is often initially surgically resected (without neoadjuvant therapy), several studies have illustrated substantial rates of discovering pathologically node-positive disease. This study evaluated national practice patterns of adjuvant therapy for this population. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried (2004-2013) for patients with cT1-2N0M0 EC that received up-front surgery (esophagectomy/local techniques) with subsequent discovery of nodal metastasis. Patients receiving any neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression determined factors predictive of receiving adjuvant therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. Propensity score matching assessed groups in a balanced manner while reducing indication biases. RESULTS Altogether, 715 patients met inclusion criteria; 114 (16%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, 183 (26%) chemoradiation, 16 (2%) radiotherapy alone, and 402 (56%) observation. Observation was more likely performed with advanced age (p = .002) and at nonacademic centers (p = .001). Median OS in the respective cohorts were 42.6, 35.1, 22.2, and 27.0 months. Both chemotherapy and chemoradiation were statistically similar (p = .462) but superior to observation (p < .05 for both). There was a survival benefit to any adjuvant treatment (median OS 38.5 vs. 27.0 months, p < .001), which persisted after propensity matching (median OS 35.1 vs. 24.3 months, p < .001). On multivariable analysis, any adjuvant treatment was independently associated with improved OS, along with treatment at an academic center (p < .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS In the largest study to date evaluating patterns of care for pN + disease following resection of cT1-2N0 EC, a strikingly high proportion of patients were observed. Adjuvant treatment, ideally chemotherapy or chemoradiation, independently correlated with higher survival, and should be considered in able patients. Treatment at academic facilities also associated with higher survival, which has implications for patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Eric Bernicker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - E. Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S. Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lewis GD, Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. The Role of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2018; 4:205-213. [PMID: 29732391 PMCID: PMC5929306 DOI: 10.3233/blc-180163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background: The standard of care for locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cystectomy. However, the role of adjuvant therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer is unclear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for patients with LABC, and to determine which risk factors best predict for patients who may best benefit from adjuvant RT. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried (2004– 2013) for patients with newly-diagnosed pT3-4N0-3M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups based on the adjuvant therapy they received: RT or observation. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving adjuvant RT, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. Results: Altogether, 1,646 patients met inclusion criteria; 59 (3.6%) patients received adjuvant RT, while 1,587 (96.4%) were observed. Patients treated with adjuvant RT were more likely to be female, have positive surgical margins, and receive treatment at a non-academic facility. There was no difference in median overall survival (OS) between patients treated with RT when compared to patients observed (17.7 months vs. 23.5 months; p = 0.085). However, an improvement in median OS with the use of adjuvant RT was observed among patients with positive surgical margins (20.3 months vs. 13.1 months; p = 0.032). On multivariate analysis, advancing age, pT4 stage, positive N stage, positive margins, and lower socioeconomic status were associated with worse OS. Conclusions: In the largest study to date evaluating efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer, use of RT was not associated with OS in all patients, while RT was associated with improvemed OS among patients with positive surgical margins. Prospective studies are recommended to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary D Lewis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Haque W, Verma V, Hatch S, Suzanne Klimberg V, Brian Butler E, Teh BS. Response rates and pathologic complete response by breast cancer molecular subtype following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 170:559-567. [PMID: 29693228 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4801-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This is the largest study to date evaluating response rates and pathologic complete response (pCR) and predictors thereof, based on molecular subtype, in women with breast cancer having undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC). METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for women with cT1-4N1-3M0 breast cancer having received NC. Patients were divided into four subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, Her2, or triple negative (TN). Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with developing pCR. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between patients by degree of response to NC when stratifying patients by subtype. RESULTS Of a total of 13,939 women, 322 (2%) were luminal A, 5941 (43%) luminal B, 2274 (16%) Her2, and 5402 (39%) TN. Overall, 19% of all patients achieved pCR, the lowest in luminal A (0.3%) and the highest in Her2 (38.7%). Molecular subtype was an independent predictor of both pCR and OS in this population. Clinical downstaging was associated with improved survival, mostly in women with luminal B, Her2, and TN subtypes. Subgroup analysis of the pCR population demonstrated 5-year OS in the luminal B, Her2, and TN cohorts of 93.0, 94.2, and 90.6%, respectively (Her2 vs. TN, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS Assessing nearly 14,000 women from a contemporary United States database, this is the largest known study examining the relationship between response to NC and molecular subtype. Women with luminal A disease are the least likely to undergo pCR, with the highest rates in Her2 disease. Degree of response is associated with OS, especially in luminal B, Her2, and TN patients. Despite the comparatively higher likelihood of achieving pCR in TN cases, this subgroup may still experience a survival detriment, which has implications for an ongoing national randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center, and Research Institute, Weil Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sandra Hatch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - V Suzanne Klimberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Polamraju P, Haque W, Verma V, Wiederhold L, Hatch S, Butler EB, Teh BS. Adjuvant Management of Pathologic Node-Positive Disease After Definitive Surgery for Clinical T1-2 N0 Rectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018; 17:e519-e530. [PMID: 29753642 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with cT1-2N0M0 rectal cancer are often treated with up-front surgical resection, with adjuvant treatment reserved for patients upstaged with pathologic node-positive (pN+) disease at surgery. This study evaluates practice patterns and clinical outcomes when comparing different forms of adjuvant treatment for this patient population. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for cT1-2N0M0 rectal cancer patients between 2004 and 2015 with postoperative pN+ disease treated without neoadjuvant treatment. Patients were divided into groups receiving observation, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Multivariable logistic regression determined factors associated with receipt of adjuvant treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves compared overall survival (OS), and Cox regression determined patient factors associated with OS. RESULTS Altogether, 1466 patients met the inclusion criteria; 536 patients (36.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 413 (28.2%) received adjuvant CRT, and 517 (35.3%) were observed postoperatively. Use of adjuvant treatment was associated with superior median OS (124.1 vs. 51.1 months, P < .001), persisting after propensity score matching (124.0 vs. 61.9 months, P < .001), but not between adjuvant CRT versus chemotherapy on subset analysis. Patients with positive surgical margins receiving adjuvant CRT showed a trend toward OS improvement compared to patients managed with chemotherapy (54.9 vs. 47.4 months, P = .10). Increased age, pN2 status, positive margin status, and observation were associated with poorer OS. CONCLUSION Most patients found to have pN+ disease after up-front surgery for cT1-2N0 rectal cancer receive adjuvant treatment, which is associated with improved OS. Chemotherapy or CRT are appropriate options, although there was a trend toward higher OS for patients with positive surgical margins receiving CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen Polamraju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Lee Wiederhold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Sandra Hatch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. Omission of radiotherapy in elderly women with early stage metaplastic breast cancer. Breast 2018; 38:154-159. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
32
|
Haque W, Lewis GD, Verma V, Darcourt JG, Butler EB, Teh BS. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced bladder cancer. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:509-515. [PMID: 29226744 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1415461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard of care for locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cystectomy. However, the role of adjuvant therapy is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LABC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy, and to determine whether select patients may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried (2004-2013) for patients with newly diagnosed pT3-4N0-3M0 bladder cancer that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups based on the adjuvant therapy they received: chemotherapy alone or observation. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS) and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. RESULTS Altogether, 2592 patients met inclusion criteria; 901 (34.8%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, while 1691 (65.2%) were observed. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to have positive margins were younger and more likely to receive treatment at a nonacademic facility. There was no difference in median OS between patients treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (22.6 vs. 21.1 months; p = .267). However, a longer median OS was observed with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was observed among patients with N2-3 disease (17.5 vs. 14.4 months; p = .005) and positive surgical margins (16.7 vs. 12.2 months; p = .025). On multivariate analysis, advancing age, pT4 stage, positive N stage, positive margins and lower socioeconomic status were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS In the largest study to date evaluating efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy, while no difference in OS was observed for adjuvant chemotherapy in all patients, a longer OS was observed among patients with N2-3 disease or with positive surgical margins. Prospective studies are recommended to further evaluate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gary D. Lewis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Jorge G. Darcourt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - E. Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S. Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. Utilization of neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer in the United States. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:282-294. [PMID: 29755767 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.11.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Randomized esophageal cancer (EC) trials have utilized two- or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Advanced radiotherapy (RT) techniques [(ARTs): intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT)] may have benefits, but are relatively unproven. This is the first study to date evaluating utilization of ARTs versus 3DCRT in the trimodality setting in the United States. Methods The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried (2004-2013) for newly-diagnosed cT1b-T4bN0/N+M0 EC receiving neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy. The primary objective was to assess temporal trends, with multivariable logistic regression analysis assessing factors predictive of receiving ARTs. Secondarily, Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS), Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS, and postoperative complications were compared between cohorts. Results Altogether, 3,138 patients met criteria; 1,398 (45%) received 3DCRT, and 1,740 (55%) received ARTs (99% IMRT, 1% PBT). Temporally, utilization of ARTs is steadily rising in the United States, from 20% in 2004 to 69% in 2013, corresponding with a progressive decrease in utilization of 3DCRT. ARTs were more often delivered with advancing age, squamous cell histology, N2+ disease, and at academic centers (P<0.05 for all). Centers in the Southwest were more likely to use ARTs, and those in the Midwest least likely (P<0.05 for both). As expected, there were no OS differences (P=0.8477); there were also no differences in postoperative events (P>0.05 for all). Treatment at an academic center independently correlated with improved OS (P<0.001). Conclusions Utilization of ARTs (IMRT in the vast majority) is steadily rising in the United States; 3DCRT is now used in a minority of patients. This has implications for payers and insurance coverage. ART use is impacted by not only age and disease factors, but also regional and facility differences. Treatment at an academic facility independently correlated with higher survival, which has implications for patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Verma V, Surkar SM, Moreno AC, Lin C, Simone CB. Practice patterns and outcomes of chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for older patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. Cancer Med 2018; 7:1604-1611. [PMID: 29603669 PMCID: PMC5943491 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Older patients are at increased risk of toxicities from aggressive oncologic therapy and of nononcologic death. A meta‐analysis of non‐nasopharyngeal head and neck cancers showed no statistical benefit in adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) in older patients; another meta‐analysis of RT versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in NPC found advantages to CRT, but vastly under‐represented patients ≥70 years old. This is the largest study to date evaluating outcomes of CRT versus RT alone in this population. The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for primary nasopharyngeal cancer cases (2004–2013) in patients ≥70 years old receiving RT alone or CRT. Patients with unknown RT/chemotherapy and T1N0 or M1 disease were excluded. Logistic regression analysis ascertained factors associated with CRT delivery. Kaplan–Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between both cohorts. Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. In total, 930 patients were analyzed (n = 713 (77%) CRT, n = 217 (23%) RT). Groups were relatively balanced; CRT was less frequently delivered in patients with advancing age, lower nodal burden, and females (P < 0.05 for all). Median OS in the CRT and RT groups were 35.3 versus 20.0 months, respectively (P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of OS included age, comorbidities, income and insurance status, tumor grade, and stage (P < 0.05 for all). Notably, receipt of chemotherapy independently predicted for improved OS (P = 0.036). CRT, compared to RT alone, was independently associated with improved survival in NPC patients ≥70 years old. CRT appears to be a promising approach in this population, but treatment‐related toxicity risks should continue to be weighed against potential oncologic benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Swati M Surkar
- Department of Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Amy C Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Koo T, Lim DH, Seol HJ, Park CK, Kim IH, Chang JH, Lee J, Jung S, Gwak HS, Cho KH, Hong CK, Lee IJ, Kim E, Kim JH, Hong YK, Jang HS, Kim CY, Kim IA, Kim SH, Kim YI, Kim EY, Kim WC, Hong S. Multi-institutional study of treatment patterns in Korean patients with WHO grade II gliomas: KNOG 15-02 and KROG 16-04 intergroup study. J Neurooncol 2018; 138:667-677. [PMID: 29572674 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2839-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We performed this study to identify the treatment patterns of patients with low-grade gliomas (LGG) in Korea. METHODS A total of 555 patients diagnosed as WHO grade II gliomas between 2000 and 2010 at 14 Korean institutions were included. The patients were divided into four adjuvant treatment groups: adjuvant fractionated radiotherapy (RT, N = 204), adjuvant chemotherapy (N = 20), adjuvant fractionated RT and chemotherapy (N = 65), and non-adjuvant treatment (N = 266) groups. We examined differences among the groups and validated patient/tumor characteristics associated with the adjuvant treatments. RESULTS Astrocytoma was diagnosed in 210 patients (38%), oligoastrocytoma in 85 patients (15%), and oligodendroglioma in 260 patients (47%). Gross total resection was performed in 200 patients (36%), subtotal resection in 153 (28%), partial resection in 71 patients (13%), and biopsy in 131 patients (24%). RT was most commonly applied as an adjuvant treatment. The use of chemotherapy with or without RT decreased after 2008 (from 38 to 4%). The major chemotherapeutic regimen was procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV); however, the proportion of temozolomide increased since 2005 (up to 69%). Patient/tumor characteristics related with RT were male gender, non-seizure, multiple lobes involvement, and non-gross total resection. Chemotherapy was associated with non-gross total resection and non-astrocytoma. CONCLUSIONS A preference for RT and increased use of temozolomide was evident in the treatment pattern of LGG. The extent of resection was associated with a decision to perform RT and chemotherapy. To establish a robust guideline for LGG, further studies including molecular information are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taeryool Koo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, South Korea
| | - Do Hoon Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Ilwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
| | - Ho Jun Seol
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chul-Kee Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Il Han Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Hee Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeongshim Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Shin Jung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, South Korea
| | - Ho-Shin Gwak
- Department of System Cancer Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Kwan Ho Cho
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Chang-Ki Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - El Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Jin Hee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Yong-Kil Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hong Seok Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chae-Yong Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - In Ah Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Sung Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Young Il Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Eun-Young Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University of Medicine, Inchon, South Korea
| | - Woo Chul Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University of Medicine, Inchon, South Korea
| | - Semie Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University Medical Center, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Verma V, Ryckman JM, Simone CB, Lin C. Patterns of care and outcomes with the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy for stage I nasopharyngeal cancer. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:257-261. [PMID: 28723264 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1351039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard of care for stage I (T1N0) nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is definitive radiotherapy (RT). Given the phase III evidence supporting combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage II NPC, we investigated practice patterns and outcomes associated with administration of chemotherapy to RT alone for stage I NPC. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for clinical T1N0 primary NPC cases (2004-2013) receiving curative-intent RT. Patients with unknown RT/chemotherapy status were excluded, as were benign/sarcomatous histologies and receipt of pharyngectomy. Patient, tumor, and treatment parameters were extracted. Logistic regression analysis ascertained factors associated with receipt of additional chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) between patients receiving RT versus CRT. Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with receipt of OS. RESULTS In total, 396 patients were analyzed. Chemotherapy was delivered in 147 patients (37%). On multivariate analysis, patients treated at academic/integrated centers were less likely to receive chemotherapy (p = .008); a racial predilection was noted, as non-black/non-white patients were also less likely to receive chemotherapy (p = .006). Respective 5-year OS in patients receiving RT alone versus CRT were 77% and 75% (p = .428). Receipt of chemotherapy did not independently predict for greater OS (p = .447). CONCLUSIONS These data do not support the routine addition of chemotherapy to definitive RT for T1N0 NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Jeffrey M. Ryckman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. Radiation dose in neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer: patterns of care and outcomes from the National Cancer Data Base. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:80-89. [PMID: 29564174 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.09.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) may utilize a wide variety of RT doses, without clear consensus to date. This study evaluated national practice patterns between lower dose (LD) (40-41.4 Gy) or higher dose (HD) (50-50.4 Gy) therapy, in addition to differences in survival and postoperative events. Methods The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried [2004-2013] for patients with newly-diagnosed cT1a-T4aN0/N+M0 EC that received neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy. Multivariable logistic regression determined factors predictive of receiving LD RT. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. Propensity score matching assessed groups in a balanced manner while reducing indication biases. Results Altogether, 5,025 patients met inclusion criteria; 257 (5%) received LD RT, while 4,768 (95%) received HD RT. LD RT was more likely delivered at academic centers (P=0.038), in more recent years (2009-2013, P=0.011), and to squamous cell carcinomas (P=0.001). HD RT tended to be administered with higher T stage as well as node-positive disease (P<0.05). The median OS in the LD and HD cohorts was 39.0 vs. 35.6 months (P=0.072), and 39.0 vs. 42.7 months after propensity matching (P=0.812). Dose did not independently correlate with OS on multivariate analysis (P=0.069), but treatment at academic centers correlated with improved OS (P=0.028). There were no differences between groups in the rates of 30-day readmission (P=0.182), 30-day mortality (P=0.314), or length of postoperative hospital stay (P=0.665), but the LD group experienced lower 90-day mortality (P=0.007). Conclusions Although neoadjuvant LD CRT has been underutilized for EC in the United States, it is rising in more recent years. Dose did not significantly impact survival before or after propensity matching, nor did it independently predict for survival. Treatment at academic facilities independently correlated with higher survival, which has implications for patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Greater Houston Physicians Medical Association, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Verma V, Simone CB, Lin C. Human papillomavirus and nasopharyngeal cancer. Head Neck 2018; 40:696-706. [PMID: 29323765 DOI: 10.1002/hed.24978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Revised: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no existing high-volume studies characterizing human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). METHODS The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for NPC with known HPV (2004-2013). Logistic regression ascertained factors associated with HPV-positivity. Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) was evaluated between HPV-positive and HPV-negative cohorts; Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed factors associated with OS. Patients with nonmetastatic disease receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy underwent propensity-matched OS analysis. RESULTS Altogether, 956 patients were analyzed (32% HPV-positive and 68% HPV-negative). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 0-67 months). The patients with HPV-positive disease were younger, less likely to be uninsured, lived in more educated areas, and presented with more advanced T (but not N/overall) classification. Median OS for HPV-positive and HPV-negative groups were 50 and 43 months, respectively (P = .171). The HPV status did not independently predict for OS (P = .183). No OS differences were observed after propensity matching (P = .734). CONCLUSION In what we believe as the only large study of HPV-associated NPC, HPV neither correlates with nor predicts survival in NPC. Owing to the difficulty of addressing causality in database studies, further work must corroborate the findings herein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Chi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Haque W, Verma V, Naik N, Butler EB, Teh BS. Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Practice Patterns, Outcomes, and the Role of Radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:928-936. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6316-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
40
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. Addition of chemotherapy to hypofractionated radiotherapy for glioblastoma: practice patterns, outcomes, and predictors of survival. J Neurooncol 2017; 136:307-315. [PMID: 29090416 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2654-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluated practice patterns, outcomes, and predictors of survival with respect to the addition of chemotherapy to definitive hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) for glioblastoma in a general patient population. The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma between 2005 and 2012 that received definitive HFRT with or without chemotherapy. Patient, tumor, and treatment parameters were extracted. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS) as well as Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with receipt of chemotherapy and OS. Propensity score matching was performed in order to assess groups in a balanced manner while reducing indication biases. 693 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 297 (42.9%) received HFRT alone, while 396 (57.1%) received chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Median follow-up was 5.2 months. Factors independently associated with chemotherapy delivery included age ≤ 65, methylated MGMT, and Asian race. Chemotherapy use was associated with improved median OS (6.8 vs. 4.3 months, p < 0.001). This persisted in both age groups of age ≤ 65 (8 vs. 4.4 months, p < 0.001) and > 65 years (6.1 vs. 4.3 months, p = 0.002) as well as on propensity-matched analysis (6.0 vs. 4.3 months, p < 0.001). In this patient population, novel independent predictors of OS were identified, which included the addition of chemotherapy (p < 0.001), receipt of surgery other than biopsy (both p < 0.05), and treatment at an academic institution (p = 0.002). Addition of chemotherapy to definitive HFRT was associated with improved OS in patients ≤ 65 and > 65 years of age. Chemotherapy was an independent predictor of OS, along with receipt of surgery and treatment at an academic institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiation for Node-Positive Bladder Cancer: Practice Patterns and Outcomes from the National Cancer Data Base. Bladder Cancer 2017; 3:283-291. [PMID: 29152552 PMCID: PMC5676760 DOI: 10.3233/blc-170137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: Management of clinically node-positive bladder cancer (cN+ BC) is poorly defined; national guidelines recommend chemotherapy (CT) alone or chemoradiation (CRT). Objective: Using a large, contemporary dataset, we evaluated national practice patterns and outcomes of CT versus CRT to elucidate the optimal therapy for this patient population. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried (2004–2013) for patients diagnosed with cTanyN1-3M0 BC. Patients were divided into two groups: CT alone or CRT. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving additional radiotherapy, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. Propensity score matching was performed to assess groups in a balanced manner while reducing indication biases. Results: Of 1,783 total patients, 1,388 (77.8%) underwent CT alone, and 395 (22.2%) CRT. Although patients receiving CRT tended to be of higher socioeconomic status, they were more likely older (p = 0.053), higher T stage, N1 (versus N2) disease, squamous histology, and treated at a non-academic center (p < 0.05). Median overall survival (OS) was 19.0 months and 13.8 months (p < 0.001) for patients receiving CRT or CT, respectively. On Cox multivariate analysis, receipt of CRT was independently associated with improved survival (p < 0.001). Outcome improvements with CRT persisted on evaluation of propensity-matched populations (p < 0.001). Conclusions: CRT is underutilized in the United States for cN+ BC but is independently associated with improved survival despite being preferentially administered to a somewhat higher-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHI St Lukes Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. National Practice Patterns and Outcomes for T4b Urothelial Cancer of the Bladder. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 16:S1558-7673(17)30268-9. [PMID: 28958674 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Revised: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Management of cT4b bladder cancer is poorly defined; national guidelines recommend chemotherapy (CT) alone or chemoradiation (CRT). Using a large, contemporary dataset, we evaluated national practice patterns as well as associated outcomes, especially with respect to radical cystectomy (RC) and CRT versus CT alone. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried (2004-2013) for patients diagnosed with cT4bN0-3M0 bladder cancer. Patients were divided into 5 treatment groups: CT alone, CRT, RC (with/without CT/radiotherapy [RT]), other treatment (subtherapeutic RT with/without CT), or no treatment. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of observation, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. RESULTS Of 896 total patients, 185 (20.6%) underwent CT alone, 80 (8.9%) CRT, 161 (18.9%) RC, 221 (24.7%) other treatments, and 249 (27.8%) observation. Differences in treatment paradigms were appreciated based on age, gender, nodal status, insurance, and facility-related parameters. Observation yielded a median OS of 3.7 months, lower than CT alone (P < .001). As compared with the latter, CRT was associated with higher OS (10.5 vs. 12.1 months, P = .004). RC-based treatment displayed the numerically highest OS (14.2 months) and was statistically similar to CRT (P = .676). Treatment with any modality independently predicted for superior OS over observation. CONCLUSIONS In the largest study of its kind, a surprisingly high proportion of patients underwent observation. CRT is associated with higher survival over CT alone, and carefully selected patients undergoing RC may experience prolonged survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Greater Houston Physicians Medical Association, Houston, TX
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. Definitive chemoradiation at high volume facilities is associated with improved survival in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2017; 135:173-181. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2563-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
44
|
McMillan MT, Ojerholm E, Verma V, Higgins KA, Singhal S, Predina JD, Berman AT, Grover S, Robinson CG, Simone CB. Radiation Treatment Time and Overall Survival in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:1142-1152. [PMID: 28721898 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Revised: 02/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prolonged radiation treatment (RT) time (RTT) has been associated with worse survival in several malignancies. The present study investigated whether delays during RT are associated with overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with stage III NSCLC who had received definitive concurrent chemotherapy and fractionated RT to standard doses (59.4-70.0 Gy) and fractionation from 2004 to 2013. The RTT was classified as standard or prolonged for each treatment regimen according to the radiation dose and number of fractions. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between the following factors and OS: RTT, RT fractionation, demographic and pathologic factors, and chemotherapeutic agents. RESULTS Of 14,154 patients, the RTT was prolonged in 6262 (44.2%). Factors associated with prolonged RTT included female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.21, P<.0001), black race (OR 1.20, P=.001), nonprivate health insurance (OR 1.30, P<.0001), and lower income (<$63,000 annually, OR 1.20, P<.0001). The median OS was significantly worse for patients with prolonged RTT than that for those with standard RTT (18.6 vs 22.7 months, P<.0001). Furthermore, the OS worsened with each cumulative interval of delay (standard RTT vs prolonged 1-2 days, 20.5 months, P=.009; prolonged 3-5 days, 17.9 months, P<.0001; prolonged 6-9 days, 17.7 months, P<.0001; prolonged >9 days, 17.1 months, P<.0001). On multivariable analysis, prolonged RTT was independently associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio 1.21, P<.0001). Prolonged RTT as a continuous variable was also significantly associated with worse OS (hazard ratio 1.001, P=.0007). CONCLUSIONS Delays during RT appear to negatively affect survival for patients with locally advanced NSCLC. We have detailed the demographic and socioeconomic barriers influencing prolonged RTT as a method to address the health disparities in this regard. Cumulative interruptions of RT should be minimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T McMillan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric Ojerholm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Kristin A Higgins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sunil Singhal
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jarrod D Predina
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Surbhi Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Cliff G Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|